Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2010 Nov 9;103(11):1692–1697. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605952

TRAIL-expressing mesenchymal stem cells kill the putative cancer stem cell population

M R Loebinger 1, E K Sage 1, D Davies 2, S M Janes 1,*
PMCID: PMC2994223  PMID: 21063402

Abstract

Background:

Tumours contain stem-like, side population (SP) cells, which have increased tumorigenic potential, resistance to traditional therapies and may be responsible for treatment failures and relapse in patients.

Methods:

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were engineered to express the apoptotic ligand, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Squamous (H357) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines were sorted into side and non-side populations (non-SP) by Hoechst flow cytometry. The survival and growth of both SP and non-SP cancer populations, in conjunction with TRAIL-expressing MSCs and mitoxantrone chemotherapy, were assessed by flow cytometry and colony forming ability.

Results:

Mesenchymal stem cells expressing TRAIL migrate to tumours and reduce the growth of primary cancers and metastases. This report demonstrates that these cells cause apoptosis, death and reduced colony formation of the SP of squamous and adenocarcinoma lung cancer cells and are synergistic when combined with traditional chemotherapy in apoptosis induction.

Conclusions:

The sensitivity of putative cancer stem cells to TRAIL-expressing MSCs, suggests their possible role in the prevention of cancer relapse.

Keywords: mesenchymal stem cell, cancer stem cell, side population, lung cancer, TRAIL, apoptosis


Cancers are composed of a heterogeneous mix of cells with varying differentiation, proliferation and tumorigenic properties (Heppner, 1984; Loebinger et al, 2008b). Indeed, in vivo studies have demonstrated that within a cancer population, only a small percentage of potential ‘cancer stem cells’ are able to initiate tumour development (Lapidot et al, 1994; Al-Hajj et al, 2003; Loebinger et al, 2008b) (Visvader and Lindeman, 2008). Conventional cancer treatments may eradicate the tumour bulk but spare these cells, which may explain why an initial tumour regression does not necessarily translate to an improved patient survival in many clinical trials for advanced cancers (Wicha et al, 2006).

The identification and destruction of these stem cells may therefore improve cancer treatment responses. Cell surface markers have been used in some cancers to produce a population of cells enriched with stem cell properties, for example, CD133 in the identification of human glioma (Singh et al, 2004) and colon cancer (Ricci-Vitiani et al, 2007) stem cells. However these markers appear specific to particular tumours and no marker has identified cancer stem cells across tumour types. Normal stem cell characteristics are often utilised to identify this population. This includes the ability to efflux nuclear dyes such as Hoechst 33342, which binds to DNA. The efflux of Hoechst is due to ABC transporters, in particular ABCG2/BCRP1 (Zhou et al, 2001). These Hoechst-effluxing cells were originally described in the bone marrow and termed ‘side population’ (SP) owing to their appearance on flow cytometry plots (Goodell et al, 1996). They have since been shown in a variety of normal tissues, wherein they possess stem-like properties (Wu and Alman, 2008). They have also been identified in many cancers, including lung (Ho et al, 2007; Sung et al, 2008), breast (Engelmann et al, 2008), oesophageal (Huang et al, 2009), hepatocellular (Kamohara et al, 2008), glioma (Harris et al, 2008), renal (Addla et al, 2008) and squamous (Loebinger et al, 2008b) cancer cell lines, in addition to primary cancer cells (Barrett et al, 1995; Hirschmann-Jax et al, 2004; Szotek et al, 2006; Wu et al, 2007).

We, and others, have previously demonstrated that this Hoechst-effluxing, SP of cells within cancers have many stem-like properties, including the ability to re-populate both the SP and non-Hoechst efflux ability non-side populations (non-SP) cell compartments, an increased ability to form colonies and generate complex spheroids in three-dimensional culture, a high telomerase activity and increased quiescence (Kondo et al, 2004; Ho et al, 2007; Addla et al, 2008; Loebinger et al, 2008b; Zhang et al, 2009). They have also been shown to express a number of stem-like genes (including OCT-4, SOX-2 and BMI-1) (Huang et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2009), ABC transporter genes (including ABCG2) (Loebinger et al, 2008b; Huang et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2009), and genes involved in the Wnt (Haraguchi et al, 2006; Addla et al, 2008; Huang et al, 2009), Notch (Addla et al, 2008; Huang et al, 2009), PI3K/Akt pathways and cell cycle regulation (Zhou et al, 2007). Side population cells derived from both primary tumours (Wu et al, 2007) and cancer cell lines (Chiba et al, 2006; Ho et al, 2007; Loebinger et al, 2008b) also have an increased ability to initiate tumours compared with the majority of the tumour cells, when xenografted into immunodeficient mice. Furthermore, we, and others, have demonstrated that the SP cells are able to escape death by many chemotherapeutic agents, owing in part to their relative quiescence, in addition to increased ABC transporter expression which leads to the efflux of lipophilic chemotherapy agents such as mitoxantrone (Hirschmann-Jax et al, 2004; Loebinger et al, 2008b). This combination of resistance and tumour initiation makes it likely that these SP cells are central to tumour growth and recurrence, and stresses the importance of targeting these cells with future cancer therapies.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used as delivery vehicles for targeted, antitumour therapies (Studeny et al, 2002; Loebinger et al, 2008a, 2008c). These cells are derived from the adult bone marrow and have the ability to specifically home towards tumours throughout the body. In addition, they are immunoprivileged, enabling their use without rejection or immunosuppressive pre-conditioning. We, and others, have engineered MSCs to express TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (Loebinger et al, 2009; Szegezdi et al, 2009; Grisendi et al, 2010). TRAIL is a protein which causes apoptosis and death of cancer cells, without harming normal cells, by binding to specific TRAIL receptors and leading to activation of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway (Wiley et al, 1995). In vivo studies have demonstrated that these cells are able to target multiple tumours and reduce primary and metastatic disease (Loebinger et al, 2009; Grisendi et al, 2010). The ability of this therapy to target and kill the putative cancer stem cells has not been determined. We hypothesised that MSC-delivered TRAIL therapy would target SP and non-SP cells equally.

Materials and methods

Tissue culture

Human adult MSCs were provided through the Tulane Centre for Gene Therapy, MSC cell distribution centre (New Orleans, LA, USA) and cultured in αMEM with 4 mM L-Glutamine, 50 U ml−1 penicillin and 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin, and 16% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. H357 cells were provided by Cancer Research UK, and cultured in a 1 : 3 mix of Hams F12 medium and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Janes and Watt, 2004). In addition to fetal bovine serum, L-Glutamine and antibiotics, this medium was supplemented with 10−10M cholera enterotoxin (ICN Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Oxon, UK), 0.5 g ml−1 hydrocortisone, 10 ng ml−1 epidermal growth factor and 5 μg ml−1 insulin (Janes et al, 2004). A549 and MDAMB231 cells were provided by Cancer Research UK and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.

Production of TRAIL-transduced MSCs

Mesenchymal stem cells were transduced with membrane-bound TRAIL and green fluorescent protein, under the control of a Tetracycline-on promoter, using a lentivirus, as previously described (Loebinger et al, 2009). The transduced MSCs (MSCFLT) expressed TRAIL and green fluorescent protein only on addition of 10 μg ml−1 doxycycline (Loebinger et al, 2009). Human TRAIL expression was verified by ELISA (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK) as per manufacturer's instructions.

SP identification and sorting

To identify the SP, previously described protocols were followed (Loebinger et al, 2008b). Cancer cells were harvested at full confluence, re-suspended at 1 × 106 cells ml−1 in medium and labelled with 2.5, 5, or 7.5 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 for 45, 60, or 90 min at 37°C to determine the required incubation time. Dead cells were excluded with propidium iodide labelling. The multidrug transporter inhibitor, reserpine (5 μM) was used to demonstrate specificity of the SP. Analysis was performed on an LSR2 machine (Becton Dickenson, Oxford, UK). The optimal staining conditions were 5 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 for 45 min and 7.5 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 for 60 min for the H357 and A549 cells, respectively (Loebinger et al, 2008b). The SP and non-SP population (1 × 106 of each cell type) were sorted according to the gates in Figure 1 using a MoFlo High-Performance Cell Sorter (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Squamous cancer and adenocarcinoma cancer cell lines contain a SP. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry plots demonstrating that H357 (A) and A549 cell lines (B) but not the MDAMB231 breast cancer cell line (C) contain a SP of cells that stain poorly with Hoechst. Cells were labelled with 7.5 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 for 45 min. This population disappears with the ABC transporter inhibitor, reserpine (5 μM). The gates show the cells defined as SP and non-SP for the experiments.

Co-culture

Cancer cells were stained with the fluorescent dye DiI (according to the manufacturer's instructions, Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), before any cell sorting, and plated with MSCFLT cells (passage seven after transduction) in a 6-well plate (5 × 104 of each cell type). The following day doxycycline was added and left for 48 h. The early and late apoptosis of the cells in co-culture was assessed by Annexin V-based flow cytometry with DAPI or propidium iodide. Annexin V/DAPI (or PI) cells were judged to be viable, Annexin V+/DAPI cells were considered to be undergoing early apoptosis, and Annexin V+/DAPI+ cells were considered late apoptotic (Loebinger et al, 2009). In subsequent assays, the cancer cells were pre-treated with 10 ng ml−1 of mitoxantrone before the addition of 5 × 104 MSCs (passage 9 and 10) or apoptosis induced by MSCFLT was compared with recombinant TRAIL (using manufacturer's guideline doses) for 48 h.

Colony formation

In all, 200 DiI-stained and then freshly sorted, SP or non-SP H357 cells were added to a 6-well plate. The following day, 5 × 104 MSCFLT cells, treated with mitomycin C to prevent their continued proliferation were added to the plates and the TRAIL transgene either activated or not with doxycycline. After 14 days of co-culture, colonies were washed, fixed using 3% PFA, and stained with Rhodanile Blue overnight. Colonies were counted using an Olympus CK2 inverted phase-contrast light microscope (Olympus, Essex, UK). A large colony was defined as greater than 32 cells per colony and abortive colonies were defined as colonies that contained fewer than 32 cells (Loebinger et al, 2008b).

Results

Squamous and lung cancer cell lines contain an ABC transporter SP

Many cancer cell lines and primary cells contain a SP. In order to identify whether squamous cell, lung and breast carcinomas contain a similar subpopulation of drug-resistant SP cells, confluent H357 (squamous), A549 (lung) and MDAMB231 (breast) cancer cell lines were incubated with Hoechst 33342 dye and analysed by flow cytometry. A characteristic SP fraction was detected in the H357 and A549 cell lines, but not in the MDAMB231 cells, which is consistent with a previous report (Engelmann et al, 2008). The squamous and lung SPs were both reserpine sensitive, indicating their dependence on ABC-type transporter activity (Figures 1A–C).

The SP cells can be killed by TRAIL-expressing MSCs

TRAIL-expressing MSCs have previously been shown to have the ability to cause cancer cell death and decrease tumour and metastasis development in vivo (Loebinger et al, 2009). In these experiments, the TRAIL lentivirus is conditionally activated with the addition of doxycycline, and carries green fluorescent protein to enable the monitoring of gene activation. We initially confirmed the production of TRAIL after activation of the transgene. MSCFLT cells were cultured with or without doxycyline for 48 h and cells harvested for protein measurement by ELISA. Doxycyline treatment led to 660 vs 2.92 pg ml−1 (P=<0.001) without treatment (Figure 2A). In co-culture experiments using H357 cells, we confirmed sensitivity of unsorted populations of these cells to doxycycline treated MSCFLT cells and found H357 cells more sensitive to MSCFLT cells than high doses of recombinant protein (Figure 2B) as previously seen by our laboratory (Loebinger et al, 2009).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mesenchymal stem cell TRAIL expression and killing effect compared with recombinant TRAIL. (A) ELISA demonstrating level of TRAIL produced in TRAIL transduced MSCs with and without addition of 10 μg ml−1 doxycycline for 48 h. (B) Bar chart demonstrating the percentage of apoptosis in A549 cells with increasing levels of recombinant TRAIL (rT) 10–200 ng ml−1 and doxycycline-induced TRAIL expression. Experiments were performed in triplicate. ***P<0.001.

The cancer stem cell hypothesis suggests that their destruction is crucial for a cancer therapy. Having isolated a population enriched for possible cancer stem cells (SP) in both squamous and lung cancer cell lines, their susceptibility to the doxycycline-controlled, TRAIL-expressing MSC therapy was tested in co-culture experiments. SP and non-SP cells were freshly flow-sorted from DiI-stained H357 and A549 cells (Figure 1) and immediately co-cultured with the MSCFLT cells. The death and apoptosis of the cancer cells in co-culture was assessed by Annexin V flow cytometry. There was a significant increase in apoptosis of both the SP and non-SP subgroups of A549 cells with the use of doxycycline and activation of the TRAIL transgene (SP: 2.7±0.5% increased to 27.7±1.9%, non-SP: 4.4±1.5% increased to 30.4±1.6%) (Figure 3A–C) and H357 cells (SP: 13.4±1.4% increased to 68.1±5.5%, non-SP: 16.1±1.4% increased to 60.9±2.5%) (Figure 3D) (both P<0.001, Anova).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-expressing MSCs lead to apoptosis of H357 and A549 SP and non-SP cells. Freshly sorted DiI-labelled A549 (AC) or H357 (D) SP and non-SP cells were co-cultured with MSCFLT cells with (dox) or without (ND) doxycycline for 48 h. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry plots demonstrating the percentage of early and late apoptotic non-SP (A) and SP (B) A549 cells. (C, D) Bar charts representing triplicate experiments demonstrating the increase in early and late apoptosis with doxycycline-induced TRAIL expression in both the SP and non-SP subgroups of A549 (C) and H357 (D) cells. ***P<0.001.

The susceptibility of the cancer cell subpopulations to TRAIL-expressing MSCs was further assessed with colony forming assays. In all, 200 DiI-stained and then freshly sorted, SP or non-SP H357 cells were added to a 6-well plate. The following day, 5 × 104 MSCFLT cells (treated with mitomycin C to prevent their further growth) were added to the plates and the TRAIL transgene either activated or not with doxycycline. As expected from previous work (Loebinger et al, 2008b), colony formation was greater in the SP subgroup compared with the non-SP cells (60.0±1.7 large colonies in the SP cells compared with 34.0±7.8 large colonies in the non-SP cells) (P<0.001, 2-way Anova). Colony formation was significantly inhibited in both cell subgroups with the doxycycline-induced activation of the TRAIL transgene of the MSCs (SP: 60±1.7 large colonies reduced to 14.7±4.2 large colonies with TRAIL expression, non-SP: 34.0±7.8 large colonies reduced to 8.0±1.7 large colonies with TRAIL expression) (both P<0.001, two-way Anova) (Figure 4A–E).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

TRAIL-expressing MSCs reduce the clonogenic potential of H357 SP and non-SP cells and produce additional SP cancer cell killing to mitoxantrone treatment. (A, B) In all, 200 DiI-labelled, SP (A) or non-SP (B) H357 cells were plated for colony forming assays before the addition of 5 × 104 TRAIL-expressing MSCs (MSCFLT). (C) Quantification of large colony numbers from (A, B) demonstrates a reduction in large colonies with doxycyline (dox)-induced TRAIL expression in both SP and non-SP cells compared with the co-cultures without dox (ND). Furthermore, SP cells produced more colonies than non-SP cells. (D) Phase-contrast and (E) fluorescent microscopy demonstrate the green fluorescent protein (green) from the doxycycline (dox)-activated MSCFLTs surrounding the DiI-labelled (red) H357 colonies. (F) SP cells were exposed to mitoxantrone (Mitox) and then co-cultured with MSCFLT cells. Bar chart represents triplicate flow cytometry experiments and demonstrates a further increase in death and apoptosis of the SP cells with the addition of doxycycline and activation of MSCFLT TRAIL expression. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, ns, non-significant. Scale bars represent 25 μm.

The addition of TRAIL-expressing MSCs to mitoxantrone treatment causes further cancer cell killing

The DiI-labelled, SP H357 cells were treated with 10 ng ml−1 mitoxantrone for 3 days followed by co-culture with MSCFLT cells. The Annexin V flow cytometry assay was used to determine the early and late apoptotic SP cancer cells. There was a significant increase in apoptotic cells with the addition of doxycycline and activation of the TRAIL transgene (56.3±10.0% with doxycycline, compared with 33.9±2.4% without doxycyline) (P<0.01, Anova) (Figure 4F). This suggests a further cancer killing effect of the TRAIL-expressing MSCs above and beyond the mitoxantrone chemotherapy agent. Indeed, when TRAIL was not expressed with doxycycline, the use of mitoxantrone alone did not significantly increase the early and late apoptotic cancer cells, consistent with a degree of mitoxantrone chemoresistance of the SP cells as discussed above (33.9±2.4% with mitoxantrone compared with 24.56±4.2% without mitoxantrone) (P>0.05, Anova) (Figure 4F).

Discussion

One feature of the SP, or subgroup of cells enriched for stem cells, is their resistance to common oncological treatments (Loebinger et al, 2009). These studies have demonstrated that this subpopulation has some resistance to chemotherapy agents such as mitoxantrone. This subgroup of cells has also been shown to be more capable of tumour initiation in subcutaneous models (Hirschmann-Jax et al, 2004; Loebinger et al, 2008b). The combination of increased treatment resistance and ability to re-populate tumours suggest new treatments should target these cells effectively. Our co-culture experiments with MSCFLT cells demonstrate that TRAIL-expressing MSCs are able to kill both SP and non-SP cells in squamous and adenocarcinoma lung cell lines with equal efficacy. This suggests that TRAIL-expressing MSCs could be a useful agent for cancer treatment either alone, or potentially in combination with other radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. The benefits of a combination approach were demonstrated in our study, with an improved SP killing when both mitoxantrone and TRAIL-expressing MSCs were used. The killing of H357 cells with activation of MSCFLT cells was higher than A549 cells (as demonstrated previously (Loebinger et al, 2009)) presumably due to a difference in TRAIL sensitivity.

The potential of using TRAIL to destroy putative cancer stem cells has been recognised by others. One study demonstrated TRAIL-induced apoptosis of CD133-positive glioma cells (Sasportas et al, 2009), a second showed radioresistant oesophageal cancer cells were 10 times more susceptible to TRAIL therapy (Zhang et al, 2008) and a further study noted an increased sensitivity of colon cancer SP cells to recombinant TRAIL therapy (Sussman et al, 2007). However, a paper by Capper et al showed CD133 glioma cells capable of neurosphere formation were completely resistant to TRAIL. Our study has two novel findings. First, we demonstrated that the combination of TRAIL with MSCs can target both SP and non-SP fractions and second, that their combination with traditional chemotherapies has a synergistic effect. We believe this lends important further evidence to the development of this cellular therapy in combination with current chemotherapy regimes.

Acknowledgments

Funding: MRL is a Medical Research Council (MRC) UK Clinical Training Fellow. EKS is a Mick Knighton Mesothelioma Fund British Lung Foundation MRC UK Clinical Training Fellow. SMJ is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow in Clinical Science. This work was partly undertaken at UCLH/UCL, which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Addla SK, Brown MD, Hart CA, Ramani VA, Clarke NW (2008) Characterization of the Hoechst 33342 side population from normal and malignant human renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F680–F687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF (2003) Prospective identification of tumourigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3983–3988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett P, Hobbs RC, Coates PJ, Risdon RA, Wright NA, Hall PA (1995) Endocrine cells of the human gastrointestinal tract have no proliferative capacity. Histochem J 27: 482–486 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiba T, Kita K, Zheng YW, Yokosuka O, Saisho H, Iwama A, Nakauchi H, Taniguchi H (2006) Side population purified from hepatocellular carcinoma cells harbors cancer stem cell-like properties. Hepatology 44: 240–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engelmann K, Shen H, Finn OJ (2008) MCF7 side population cells with characteristics of cancer stem/progenitor cells express the tumour antigen MUC1. Cancer Res 68: 2419–2426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC (1996) Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med 183: 1797–1806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grisendi G, Bussolari R, Cafarelli L, Petak I, Rasini V, Veronesi E, De Santis G, Spano C, Tagliazzucchi M, Barti-Juhasz H, Scarabelli L, Bambi F, Frassoldati A, Rossi G, Casali C, Morandi U, Horwitz EM, Paolucci P, Conte P, Dominici M (2010) Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells as stable source of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand delivery for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 70: 3718–3729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haraguchi N, Utsunomiya T, Inoue H, Tanaka F, Mimori K, Barnard GF, Mori M (2006) Characterization of a side population of cancer cells from human gastrointestinal system. Stem Cells 24: 506–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris MA, Yang H, Low BE, Mukherje J, Guha A, Bronson RT, Shultz LD, Israel MA, Yun K (2008) Cancer stem cells are enriched in the side population cells in a mouse model of glioma. Cancer Res 68: 10051–10059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heppner GH (1984) Tumour heterogeneity. Cancer Res 44: 2259–2265 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirschmann-Jax C, Foster AE, Wulf GG, Nuchtern JG, Jax TW, Gobel U, Goodell MA, Brenner MK (2004) A distinct ‘side population’ of cells with high drug efflux capacity in human tumour cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 14228–14233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ho MM, Ng AV, Lam S, Hung JY (2007) Side population in human lung cancer cell lines and tumours is enriched with stem-like cancer cells. Cancer Res 67: 4827–4833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang D, Gao Q, Guo L, Zhang C, Jiang W, Li H, Wang J, Han X, Shi Y, Lu SH (2009) Isolation and identification of cancer stem-like cells in esophageal carcinoma cell lines. Stem Cells Dev 18: 465–473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Janes SM, Ofstad TA, Campbell DH, Watt FM, Prowse DM (2004) Transient activation of FOXN1 in keratinocytes induces a transcriptional programme that promotes terminal differentiation: contrasting roles of FOXN1 and Akt. J Cell Sci 117: 4157–4168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Janes SM, Watt FM (2004) Switch from {alpha}v{beta}5 to {alpha}v{beta}6 integrin expression protects squamous cell carcinomas from anoikis. J Cell Biol 166: 419–431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamohara Y, Haraguchi N, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Inoue H, Mori M, Kanematsu T (2008) The search for cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 144: 119–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T (2004) Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 781–786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, Caceres-Cortes J, Minden M, Paterson B, Caligiuri MA, Dick JE (1994) A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367: 645–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Loebinger MR, Aguilar S, Janes SM (2008a) Therapeutic potential of stem cells in lung disease: progress and pitfalls. Clin Sci (Lond) 114: 99–108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Loebinger MR, Eddaoudi A, Davies D, Janes SM (2009) Mesenchymal stem cell delivery of TRAIL can eliminate metastatic cancer. Cancer Res 69: 4134–4142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Loebinger MR, Giangreco A, Groot KR, Prichard L, Allen K, Simpson C, Bazley L, Navani N, Tibrewal S, Davies D, Janes SM (2008b) Squamous cell cancers contain a side population of stem-like cells that are made chemosensitive by ABC transporter blockade. Br J Cancer 98: 380–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Loebinger MR, Sage EK, Janes SM (2008c) Mesenchymal stem cells as vectors for lung disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5: 711–716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, Biffoni M, Todaro M, Peschle C, De Maria R (2007) Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature 445: 111–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasportas LS, Kasmieh R, Wakimoto H, Hingtgen S, van de Water JA, Mohapatra G, Figueiredo JL, Martuza RL, Weissleder R, Shah K (2009) Assessment of therapeutic efficacy and fate of engineered human mesenchymal stem cells for cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4822–4827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB (2004) Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432: 396–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Studeny M, Marini FC, Champlin RE, Zompetta C, Fidler IJ, Andreeff M (2002) Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells as vehicles for interferon-beta delivery into tumours. Cancer Res 62: 3603–3608 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sung JM, Cho HJ, Yi H, Lee CH, Kim HS, Kim DK, Abd El-Aty AM, Kim JS, Landowski CP, Hediger MA, Shin HC (2008) Characterization of a stem cell population in lung cancer A549 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371: 163–167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sussman RT, Ricci MS, Hart LS, Sun SY, El-Deiry WS (2007) Chemotherapy-resistant side-population of colon cancer cells has a higher sensitivity to TRAIL than the non-SP, a higher expression of c-Myc and TRAIL-receptor DR4. Cancer Biol Ther 6: 1490–1495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Szegezdi E, O'Reilly A, Davy Y, Vawda R, Taylor DL, Murphy M, Samali A, Mehmet H (2009) Stem cells are resistant to TRAIL receptor-mediated apoptosis. J Cell Mol Med 13: 4409–4414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Szotek PP, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Masiakos PT, Dinulescu DM, Connolly D, Foster R, Dombkowski D, Preffer F, Maclaughlin DT, Donahoe PK (2006) Ovarian cancer side population defines cells with stem cell-like characteristics and Mullerian Inhibiting Substance responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 11154–11159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ (2008) Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 755–768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wicha MS, Liu S, Dontu G (2006) Cancer stem cells: an old idea--a paradigm shift. Cancer Res 66: 1883–1890; discussion 1895-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, Din WS, Huang CP, Nicholl JK, Sutherland GR, Smith TD, Rauch C, Smith CA, Goodwin RG (1995) Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity 3: 673–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu C, Alman BA (2008) Side population cells in human cancers. Cancer Lett 268: 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu C, Wei Q, Utomo V, Nadesan P, Whetstone H, Kandel R, Wunder JS, Alman BA (2007) Side population cells isolated from mesenchymal neoplasms have tumour initiating potential. Cancer Res 67: 8216–8222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang P, Zhang Y, Mao L, Zhang Z, Chen W (2009) Side population in oral squamous cell carcinoma possesses tumour stem cell phenotypes. Cancer Lett 277: 227–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang X, Komaki R, Wang L, Fang B, Chang JY (2008) Treatment of radioresistant stem-like esophageal cancer cells by an apoptotic gene-armed, telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus. Clin Cancer Res 14: 2813–2823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou J, Wulfkuhle J, Zhang H, Gu P, Yang Y, Deng J, Margolick JB, Liotta LA, Petricoin III E, Zhang Y (2007) Activation of the PTEN/mTOR/STAT3 pathway in breast cancer stem-like cells is required for viability and maintenance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16158–16163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou S, Schuetz JD, Bunting KD, Colapietro AM, Sampath J, Morris JJ, Lagutina I, Grosveld GC, Osawa M, Nakauchi H, Sorrentino BP (2001) The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med 7: 1028–1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES