Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2010 Nov 2;103(11):1755–1759. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605965

Oral contraceptives, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

K K Tsilidis 1,*, N E Allen 1, T J Key 1, K Bakken 2, E Lund 2, F Berrino 3, A Fournier 4,5, A Olsen 6, A Tjønneland 6, K Overvad 7, M-C Boutron-Ruault 4,5, F Clavel-Chapelon 4,5, G Byrnes 8, V Chajes 8, S Rinaldi 8, J Chang-Claude 9, R Kaaks 9, M Bergmann 10, H Boeing 10, Y Koumantaki 11, G Stasinopoulou 11,12, A Trichopoulou 11,12, D Palli 13, G Tagliabue 14, S Panico 15, R Tumino 16, P Vineis 17,18, H B Bueno-de-Mesquita 19,20, F J B van Duijnhoven 19, C H van Gils 21, P H M Peeters 21, L Rodríguez 22, C A González 23, M-J Sánchez 24, M-D Chirlaque 25, A Barricarte 26, M Dorronsoro 27, S Borgquist 28, J Manjer 29, B van Guelpen 30, G Hallmans 31, S A Rodwell 32,✠, K-T Khaw 33, T Norat 18, D Romaguera 18, E Riboli 18
PMCID: PMC2994229  PMID: 21045829

Abstract

Background:

Oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors may initiate long-term changes to the hormonal milieu and thereby, possibly influence colorectal cancer risk.

Methods:

We examined the association of hormonal and reproductive factors with risk of colorectal cancer among 337 802 women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, of whom 1878 developed colorectal cancer.

Results:

After stratification for center and age, and adjustment for body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, physical activity and alcohol consumption, ever use of oral contraceptives was marginally inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR), 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–1.02), although this association was stronger among post-menopausal women (HR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95). Duration of oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors, including age at menarche, age at menopause, type of menopause, ever having an abortion, parity, age at first full-term pregnancy and breastfeeding, were not associated with colorectal cancer risk.

Conclusion:

Our findings provide limited support for a potential inverse association between oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk.

Keywords: oral contraceptives, reproductive history, colorectal cancer, cohort study

Men tend to have a slightly higher incidence of colorectal cancer than women of similar age (American Cancer Society, 2007). Oestrogen has been implicated for this decreased risk in women through mechanisms that involve reduction of secondary bile acid production (McMichael and Potter, 1980; Bayerdorffer et al, 1995), reduction of circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (Campagnoli et al, 1993; Renehan et al, 2004), and protection of the oestrogen receptor gene from methylation (Issa et al, 1994).

The epidemiologic evidence for a causal link between oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk is equivocal. Some studies have suggested inverse associations (Potter and McMichael, 1983; Martinez et al, 1997; Fernandez et al, 1998; Nichols et al, 2005; Campbell et al, 2007; Hannaford et al, 2007; Lin et al, 2007; Kabat et al, 2008), whereas others have found no association (Weiss et al, 1981; Bostick et al, 1994; Jacobs et al, 1994; Platz et al, 1997; Troisi et al, 1997; Levi et al, 2003; Purdue et al, 2005; Dorjgochoo et al, 2009; Rosenblatt et al, 2009). A recent meta-analysis, summarising the results from 7 cohort and 11 case–control studies, reported a statistically significant 19% reduced risk among ever users of oral contraceptives compared with never users, although there was no clear association with increasing duration of use (Bosetti et al, 2009). No consistent association has been observed for menstrual and reproductive variables and risk of colorectal cancer (Weiss et al, 1981; Potter and McMichael, 1983; Peters et al, 1990; Wu-Williams et al, 1991; Gerhardsson de Verdier and London, 1992; Bostick et al, 1994; Jacobs et al, 1994; Kampman et al, 1997; Martinez et al, 1997; Platz et al, 1997; Talamini et al, 1998; Nichols et al, 2005; Purdue et al, 2005; Lin et al, 2007; Sakauchi, 2007; Akhter et al, 2008; Kabat et al, 2008; Rosenblatt et al, 2009), although the majority of the studies are case–control or small cohort studies with low power to study dose–response associations.

We examined the associations of oral contraceptive use and reproductive variables with colorectal cancer risk in the large European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

Materials and Methods

Study participants included 1878 female colorectal cancer cases (1295 colon and 583 rectal cancers) and 335 924 female non-cases recruited into EPIC, a prospective cohort that was established in the 1990s in 10 European countries with more than half a million participants, mostly aged 35–70 years. Incident cancer cases were identified through linkage to population cancer registries in Denmark, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the UK, or with a combination of methods including linkage to health insurance records, cancer and pathology registries, and active follow-up of study participants or their next of kin in France, Germany and Greece. The colorectal cancer diagnosis was confirmed by histology for 80.2% of the cases, by clinical examination for 11.6% and the remaining 8.2% by self-report, autopsy or death certificate. Women were excluded if they had prevalent cancer at recruitment, if they did not return the baseline lifestyle questionnaire, if they never menstruated or if they had missing information on all exposure variables. Details on the cohort population, the data collection procedures and the outcome and covariate assessment methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Riboli et al, 2002; Tsilidis et al, 2010).

Women were asked at the baseline questionnaire whether they had ever used oral contraceptives, their duration of use, and age they started use. Information on age at menarche and menopause, numbers of full-term pregnancies (live and still births) and induced or spontaneous abortions, age at the first full-term pregnancy, and the reason for menopause (natural vs surgical) was also collected. Information on breastfeeding was collected for the first three full-term pregnancies and the last one. Menopausal status was defined according to information on menstruation status and ovariectomy, details of which are provided elsewhere (Dossus et al., 2010).

Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for colorectal cancer were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by EPIC-participating center and age at recruitment (⩽50, 51–53, 54–56, 57–59, 60–62, 63–65, >65 years) and adjusted for smoking status (never, former and current), self-reported diabetes mellitus (no or yes), body mass index (BMI; <25, ⩾25–<30, ⩾30 kg m−2), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active, and alcohol intake (quartiles: <0.58, ⩾0.58–<3.61, ⩾3.61–<11.08, ⩾11.08 g per day). Missing values for smoking status (2.2%), diabetes (4.2%), physical activity (13.4%) and alcohol (0.8%) were included as a separate category in the models. An analysis that excluded women with missing values for these covariates provided very similar results, and these are not presented here. Further adjustment for menopausal hormone therapy, waist and hip circumference, waist to hip ratio, dietary variables (intakes of energy, saturated fat, fibre, folate, calcium and red meat) or mutual adjustment for oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors in relevant models gave virtually identical results. Analyses were also performed according to EPIC country, cancer subsite (colon vs rectum) and potentially modifying factors (age at recruitment (at the median, <51 vs ⩾51 years), BMI (<25 vs ⩾25 kg m−2), menopausal hormone therapy (ever vs never) and menopausal status (post- vs pre-/peri-menopausal)).

Results

The mean ages at recruitment and diagnosis for the colorectal cancer cases were 57 and 63 years, respectively, and the mean length of follow-up in the whole cohort was 9 years. Compared with women without colorectal cancer, cases were on average older, had slightly higher BMI, drank more alcohol, exercised less and were less likely to have ever taken oral contraceptives (Table 1).

Table 1. Participant characteristics at recruitment among women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.

Characteristic Colorectal cancer cases (n=1878) Non-cases (n=335 924)
Mean (s.d.) age at recruitment (years) 57.4 (8.0) 50.5 (9.7)
Mean (s.d.) body mass index (kg m−2) 25.5 (4.5) 25.0 (4.5)
Mean (s.d.) alcohol intake (g per day)a 10 (13.7) 9.0 (12.2)
Moderately active/active (%) 31.7 34.2
Current smokers (%) 18.5 19.6
Self-reported diabetes mellitus (%) 3.0 2.3
     
Menopausal status (%)
 Pre-menopausal 11.2 34.2
 Peri-menopausal/unknown 14.7 18.8
 Post-menopausal (natural/surgical) 74.1 47.0
     
Ever oral contraceptive use (%) 43.8 58.4
Mean (s.d.) duration of oral contraceptive use (years)b 9.2 (9.8) 8.7 (9.3)
Mean (s.d.) age at menarche (years) 13.2 (1.6) 13.1 (1.5)
Mean (s.d.) age at menopause (years)c 49.1 (4.9) 48.6 (5.1)
Ever had a full-term pregnancy (%) 83.5 79.6
Mean (s.d.) number of full-term pregnanciesd 2.4 (1.1) 2.3 (1.0)
Mean (s.d.) age at first full-term pregnancy, yearsd 25.0 (4.4) 24.8 (4.4)
Ever breastfed (%)d 81.2 81.8
Open in a new tab
a

Among consumers only; 8.8% of the cases and 9.2% of the non-cases were non-consumers of alcohol.

b

Among ever oral contraceptive users only.

c

Among post-menopausal women only.

d

Among women with a full-term pregnancy only.

Overall, there were no statistically significant associations between oral contraceptives, reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk (Table 2). Ever use of oral contraceptives was marginally inversely associated with risk (HR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83–1.02), but neither duration of use (P-trend, 0.41) nor age at start of use (P-trend, 0.32) were associated with risk. However, the association of oral contraceptive use on risk varied by menopausal status (P-interaction, <0.01); ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a significantly reduced risk in post-menopausal women (HR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95), but no significant association was observed among pre- or peri-menopausal women (HR, 1.19; 95% CI: 0.96–1.48). There was no evidence of an interaction for duration or age at start of oral contraceptive use by menopausal status (data not shown).

Table 2. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for oral contraceptive use, reproductive variables and colorectal cancer among women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.

Variable Number of cases/non-casesa Age and center-stratified, HR (95% CI) Multivariable adjusted, HR (95% CI)b
Oral contraceptive use
 Never 1040/138 359 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 822/196 040 0.93 (0.84–1.03) 0.92 (0.83–1.02)
       
Oral contraceptive use (among post-menopausal women)
 Never 908/89 064 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 469/67 757 0.85 (0.75–0.96) 0.84 (0.74–0.95)
       
Oral contraceptive use (among pre-/peri-menopausal women)
 Never 132/49 295 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 353/128 283 1.22 (0.99–1.51) 1.19 (0.96–1.48)
 P-interaction   <0.01 <0.01
       
Duration of oral contraceptive use (years) c
 ⩽1 161/36 175 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 2–4 167/42 208 0.99 (0.80–1.24) 0.99 (0.80–1.23)
 5–9 150/42 409 0.94 (0.75–1.18) 0.93 (0.74–1.17)
 ⩾10 264/58 041 1.10 (0.90–1.36) 1.09 (0.89–1.35)
 P-trend   0.37 0.41
       
Age at menarche
 <12 258/49 935 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 12 358/70 982 0.95 (0.81–1.11) 0.95 (0.81–1.12)
 13 457/85 998 0.96 (0.83–1.12) 0.97 (0.84–1.14)
 14 424/71 912 0.95 (0.82–1.12) 0.97 (0.83–1.14)
 ⩾15 352/52 954 0.95 (0.80–1.12) 0.96 (0.82–1.14)
 P-trend   0.64 0.80
       
Age at menopause d
 ⩽50 654/77 482 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 51–52 200/20 489 1.06 (0.90–1.25) 1.07 (0.91–1.25)
 53–55 196/18 391 1.06 (0.90–1.25) 1.07 (0.91–1.26)
 >55 59/5084 0.99 (0.76–1.30) 1.00 (0.76–1.31)
 P-trend   0.58 0.54
       
Type of menopause d
 Natural 1303/147 920 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Surgical 88/9 875 1.14 (0.91–1.42) 1.13 (0.91–1.41)
       
Induced or spontaneous abortion
 Never 1129/180 995 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 221/45 509 1.01 (0.87–1.18) 1.00 (0.86–1.17)
       
Full-term pregnancy
 Never 231/49 342 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 1568/267 467 0.96 (0.83–1.10) 0.96 (0.83–1.10)
       
Number of full-term pregnancies e
 1 250/49 177 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 2 721/129 409 1.16 (1.00–1.34)) 1.16 (1.01–1.35)
 3 384/61 490 1.15 (0.98–1.36) 1.16 (0.98–1.36)
 ⩾4 213/27 391 1.17 (0.97–1.41) 1.17 (0.97–1.42)
 P-trend   0.15 0.15
       
Age at first full-term pregnancy e
 ⩽20 210/40 007 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 21–23 433/71 912 1.01 (0.86–1.19) 1.02 (0.86–1.21)
 24–25 320/52 140 0.97 (0.81–1.16) 0.98 (0.82–1.18)
 26–30 439/75 488 0.90 (0.76–1.07) 0.92 (0.77–1.09)
 >30 163/26 886 0.98 (0.79–1.20) 0.99 (0.80–1.22)
 P-trend   0.22 0.30
       
Breastfeeding e
 Never 211/39 471 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Ever 1273/218 695 1.12 (0.97–1.31) 1.13 (0.97–1.32)
Open in a new tab
a

The number of cases and non-cases do not add up to the total number of 1878 cases and 335 924 non-cases because of missing values.

b

From a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition participating center and age at recruitment, and adjusted for smoking status (never, former, current), diabetes mellitus (never, ever), body mass index (<25, ⩾25–<30, ⩾30 kg m−2), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), and alcohol use (<0.58, ⩾0.58–<3.61, ⩾3.61–<11.08, ⩾11.08 g per day).

c

Among ever oral contraceptive users only.

d

Among post-menopausal women only.

e

Among women with a full-term pregnancy.

Reproductive factors, including age at menarche, age at menopause, type of menopause, ever having an abortion, parity, age at first full-term pregnancy and breastfeeding, were not associated with colorectal cancer risk (Table 2). The associations between oral contraceptive use, reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk did not differ according to country, colorectal cancer subsite and baseline characteristics (age, BMI, menopausal hormone therapy and menopausal status).

Discussion

In this large prospective study, ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a small reduction in colorectal cancer risk, which was stronger among post-menopausal women compared with pre-/peri-menopausal women. Although our finding of an inverse association with use of oral contraceptives is consistent with the prior literature (Bosetti et al, 2009), most studies have not reported a reduction in colorectal cancer risk with increasing duration of oral contraceptive use (Bosetti et al, 2009). This may, in part, be because of relatively small study sizes to detect a significant association, although the present study, with over 1800 cases, also found no association with duration of oral contraceptive use. Our stronger inverse finding for oral contraceptive use and colorectal cancer risk in post-menopausal women did not change after adjustment for menopausal hormone therapy and reproductive variables, and is not explained by a longer duration of oral contraceptive use among older women as there was no association between duration of use and risk overall or in subgroups by menopausal status. In addition, post-menopausal women had only a slightly longer mean duration of oral contraceptive use compared with pre-/peri-menopausal women (9.1 vs 8.5 years), despite being older at recruitment (58 vs 44 years). However, post-menopausal women were more likely to have started using oral contraceptives during the 1960 s when high-dose formulations were much more common (McMichael and Potter, 1980), which may partly explain the apparent higher risk in these women. Earlier studies have not reported significant interactions between oral contraceptive use and colorectal cancer risk by age or menopausal status (Kampman et al, 1997; Lin et al, 2007); however, one case–control study observed a non-significant reduced risk of colon cancer for ever use of oral contraceptives among women older than 62 years at recruitment, and no association among younger women (Kampman et al, 1997). Future studies with detailed information on the dose and hormonal constituent of the oral contraceptives are needed to clarify this association. No significant associations were found for reproductive factors, which is consistent with most of the literature (Gerhardsson de Verdier and London, 1992; Kampman et al, 1997; Troisi et al, 1997; Nichols et al, 2005; Lin et al, 2007; Sakauchi, 2007; Akhter et al, 2008; Kabat et al, 2008).

The major strength of this study is its size and power to study dose-response associations, and its detailed and standardised assessment of reproductive factors across Europe. In conclusion, oral contraceptive use was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer among post-menopausal women. Duration of oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors were not associated with risk. Our findings provide limited support for a potential inverse association between oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk.

Acknowledgments

The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue contre le Cancer, Société 3M, Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (France); Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, Stavros Niarchos Foundation and Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC) and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF); Statistics Netherlands(The Netherlands); Norwegian Cancer Society (Norway); Health Research Fund (FIS), Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020) (Spain); Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Scientific Council and Regional Government of Skåne and Västerbotten (Sweden); Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health, Food Standards Agency, and Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom).

References

  1. Akhter M, Inoue M, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S (2008) Reproductive factors, exogenous female hormone use and colorectal cancer risk: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 17: 515–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. American Cancer Society (2007) Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. American Cancer Society: Atlanta [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayerdorffer E, Mannes GA, Ochsenkuhn T, Dirschedl P, Wiebecke B, Paumgartner G (1995) Unconjugated secondary bile acids in the serum of patients with colorectal adenomas. Gut 36: 268–273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosetti C, Bravi F, Negri E, La Vecchia C (2009) Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 15: 489–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bostick RM, Potter JD, Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Steinmetz KA, McKenzie DR, Gapstur SM, Folsom AR (1994) Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 5: 38–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campagnoli C, Biglia N, Altare F, Lanza MG, Lesca L, Cantamessa C, Peris C, Fiorucci GC, Sismondi P (1993) Differential effects of oral conjugated estrogens and transdermal estradiol on insulin-like growth factor 1, growth hormone and sex hormone binding globulin serum levels. Gynecol Endocrinol 7: 251–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell PT, Newcomb P, Gallinger S, Cotterchio M, McLaughlin JR (2007) Exogenous hormones and colorectal cancer risk in Canada: associations stratified by clinically defined familial risk of cancer. Cancer Causes Control 18: 723–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorjgochoo T, Shu XO, Li HL, Qian HZ, Yang G, Cai H, Gao YT, Zheng W (2009) Use of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to 2006. Int J Cancer 124: 2442–2449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dossus L, Allen N, Kaaks R, Bakken K, Lund E, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F, Fournier A, Chabbert-Buffet N, Boeing H, Schutze M, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Lagiou P, Palli D, Krogh V, Tumino R, Vineis P, Mattiello A, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Onland-Moret NC, Peeters PH, Dumeaux V, Redondo ML, Duell E, Sanchez-Cantalejo E, Arriola L, Chirlaque MD, Ardanaz E, Manjer J, Borgquist S, Lukanova A, Lundin E, Khaw KT, Wareham N, Key T, Chajes V, Rinaldi S, Slimani N, Mouw T, Gallo V, Riboli E (2010) Reproductive risk factors and endometrial cancer: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 127: 442–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Braga C, Talamini R, Negri E, Parazzini F (1998) Oral contraceptive use and risk of colorectal cancer. Epidemiology 9: 295–300 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerhardsson de Verdier M, London S (1992) Reproductive factors, exogenous female hormones, and colorectal cancer by subsite. Cancer Causes Control 3: 355–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hannaford PC, Selvaraj S, Elliott AM, Angus V, Iversen L, Lee AJ (2007) Cancer risk among users of oral contraceptives: cohort data from the Royal College of General Practitioner's oral contraception study. BMJ 335: 651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Issa JP, Ottaviano YL, Celano P, Hamilton SR, Davidson NE, Baylin SB (1994) Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon. Nat Genet 7: 536–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs EJ, White E, Weiss NS (1994) Exogenous hormones, reproductive history, and colon cancer (Seattle, Washington, USA). Cancer Causes Control 5: 359–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kabat GC, Miller AB, Rohan TE (2008) Oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Int J Cancer 122: 643–646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kampman E, Potter JD, Slattery ML, Caan BJ, Edwards S (1997) Hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history, and colon cancer: a multicenter, case-control study in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 8: 146–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levi F, Pasche C, Lucchini F, La Vecchia C (2003) Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis 35: 85–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin J, Zhang SM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Lee IM (2007) Oral contraceptives, reproductive factors, and risk of colorectal cancer among women in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 165: 794–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez ME, Grodstein F, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hennekens C, Rosner B, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ (1997) A prospective study of reproductive factors, oral contraceptive use, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6: 1–5 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McMichael AJ, Potter JD (1980) Reproduction, endogenous and exogenous sex hormones, and colon cancer: a review and hypothesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 65: 1201–1207 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA (2005) Oral contraceptive use, reproductive factors, and colorectal cancer risk: findings from Wisconsin. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 1212–1218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peters RK, Pike MC, Chang WW, Mack TM (1990) Reproductive factors and colon cancers. Br J Cancer 61: 741–748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Platz EA, Martinez ME, Grodstein F, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E (1997) Parity and other reproductive factors and risk of adenomatous polyps of the distal colorectum (United States). Cancer Causes Control 8: 894–903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Potter JD, McMichael AJ (1983) Large bowel cancer in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 71: 703–709 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Purdue MP, Mink PJ, Hartge P, Huang WY, Buys S, Hayes RB (2005) Hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history, and colorectal adenomas: data from the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial (United States). Cancer Causes Control 16: 965–973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, O′Dwyer ST, Shalet SM, Egger M (2004) Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 363: 1346–1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, Ferrari P, Norat T, Fahey M, Charrondiere UR, Hemon B, Casagrande C, Vignat J, Overvad K, Tjonneland A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Thiebaut A, Wahrendorf J, Boeing H, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A, Vineis P, Palli D, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Lund E, Engeset D, Gonzalez CA, Barricarte A, Berglund G, Hallmans G, Day NE, Key TJ, Kaaks R, Saracci R (2002) European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutr 5: 1113–1124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosenblatt KA, Gao DL, Ray RM, Nelson ZC, Wernli KJ, Li W, Thomas DB (2009) Oral contraceptives and the risk of all cancers combined and site-specific cancers in Shanghai. Cancer Causes Control 20: 27–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakauchi F (2007) Reproductive history and health screening for women and mortality in the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer (JACC). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 8( Suppl): 129–134 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Talamini R, Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Negri E, Conti E, Filiberti R, Montella M, Nanni O, La Vecchia C (1998) The influence of reproductive and hormonal factors on the risk of colon and rectal cancer in women. Eur J Cancer 34: 1070–1076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Troisi R, Schairer C, Chow WH, Schatzkin A, Brinton LA, Fraumeni Jr JF (1997) Reproductive factors, oral contraceptive use, and risk of colorectal cancer. Epidemiology 8: 75–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsilidis KK, Allen NE, Key TJ, SanJoaquin MA, Bakken K, Berrino F, Fournier A, Lund E, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Byrnes G, Chajes V, Rinaldi S, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Chang-Claude J, Kaaks R, Bergmann M, Boeing H, Koumantaki Y, Palli D, Pala V, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, van Duijnhoven FJB, van Gils CH, Peeters PHM, Rodríguez L, González CA, Sánchez M-J, Chirlaque M-D, Barricarte A, Dorronsoro M, Khaw K-T, Rodwell SA, Norat T, Romaguera D, Riboli E (2010) Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer (accepted)
  33. Weiss NS, Daling JR, Chow WH (1981) Incidence of cancer of the large bowel in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 67: 57–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu-Williams AH, Lee M, Whittemore AS, Gallagher RP, Jiao DA, Zheng S, Zhou L, Wang XH, Chen K, Jung D, Teh C-Z, Chengde L, Yao XJ, Paffenbarger RS, Henderson BE (1991) Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Res 51: 2307–2311 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES