Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2010 Nov 9;16:2347–2353.

A Chinese family with progressive childhood cataracts and IVS3+1G>A CRYBA3/A1 mutations

Yanan Zhu 1, Xingchao Shentu 1, Wei Wang 1, Jinyu Li 1, Chongfei Jin 1, Ke Yao 1,
PMCID: PMC2994768  PMID: 21139983

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the disease-causing mutations in a Chinese family with progressive childhood cataracts.

Methods

Family history and clinical data were recorded. Direct gene sequencing together with multi-point linkage analysis using microsatellite markers flanking the gene was applied to identify the disease-causing mutation.

Results

Lens examination in the affected members revealed childhood cataracts along with progressive developing fetal nuclear lactescent cataracts with ‘Y’ sutural opacities, and also progressive developing peripheral cortical opacities. Direct gene sequencing showed a G>A transition at the donor splice site of intron 3 (IVS3+1 G>A) of the βA1/A3-crystallin gene (CRYBA3/A1) in this Chinese autosomal dominant childhood cataract family, and the maximum heterogeneity logarithm of odds (HLOD) score obtained by multi-point analysis was detected at marker locus D17S1800 (HLOD=3.005; α=1.000).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a phenotype of progressive nuclear and cortical cataracts related to the CRYBA3/A1 mutation IVS3+1 G>A. This finding expands the spectrum of cataract phenotypes caused by the IVS3+1 G>A mutation of CRYBA3/A1, confirms the phenotypic heterogeneity of this mutation and suggests the mechanism that influences the cataractogenesis in different ethnic backgrounds.

Introduction

Childhood cataracts are a cause of childhood blindness worldwide. This disease accounts for more than 1 million blind children in Asia and about 10% of the childhood blindness worldwide [1]. Childhood cataracts are also a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder in which the phenotype varies considerably between and within families [2]. From an etiological point of view, genetic mutation might be the most common cause, especially for bilateral cataracts. All three forms of Mendelian inheritance have been observed, and the most frequently seen in non-consanguineous populations is autosomal dominant (AD) transmission. At present, over 26 out of the 39 mapped loci for isolated congenital or childhood cataracts have been associated with mutations in specific genes [3]. Of the cataract families in which the mutant gene is known, approximately half have crystallin mutations, including the αA-crystallin gene (CRYAA), αB-crystallin (CRYAB), CRYBA3/A1, βA4-crystallin (CRYBA4), βB1-crystallin (CRYBB1), βB2-crystallin (CRYBB2), γC-crystallin (CRYGC), γD-crystallin (CRYGD) and γS-crystallin (CRYGS) [3-10], approximately one quarter have connexin mutations in Connexin 46 (GJA3) and Connexin 50 (GJA8) [11,12], with the remainder being divided among the genes for heat shock transcription factor-4 (HSF4) [13], aquaporin-0 (AQP0, MIP) [14,15], beaded filament structural protein-2 (BFSP2) [16], paired-like homeodomain 3 (PITX3) [17], chromatin modifying protein 4B (CHMP4B) [18], and EPH receptor A2 (EPHA2) [19]. Most of the mutations detected in these genes are missense and nonsense mutations [3]. Among them, CRYAA [20], CRYBA3/A1 [21], CRYBB2 [22], CRYGC [23], CRYGD [24], GJA3 [25,26], GJA8 [26], BFSP2 [27], MIP [28], and HSF4 [29] have been reported to be related to nuclear cataracts.

The CRYBA3/A1 mutation was first identified as a cause of cataracts in a pedigree with autosomal dominant zonular cataracts [8]. To date, three mutations have been reported in CRYBA3/A1, IVS3+1 G>C [30], IVS3+1 G>A [8,21,31], and 279delGAG [32,33]. IVS3+1 G>A has been observed only in the Indian, Australian, and Chinese populations. In the Chinese population, this mutation is related to posterior polar cataracts [34].

In this study, we identified a Chinese family with CRYBA3/A1 IVS3+1 G>A by genetic analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first report to relate this mutation site with progressive childhood cataracts characterized by opacities in the fetal nucleus and peripheral cortex.

Methods

Family data and genomic DNA preparation

A four-generation family with autosomal dominant childhood cataracts was ascertained through the Eye Center of the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, and this study was approved by the Zhejiang University Institutional Review Board. Appropriate informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study protocol followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Seventeen individuals (9 affected and 8 unaffected) from the family took part in the study (Figure 1). The affected status was determined by a history of cataract extraction or ophthalmologic examination, including visual acuity, slit lamp, and fundus examination. The phenotypes were documented by slit lamp photography.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pedigree of the proband. The black symbols indicate individuals with a diagnosis of congenital cataract performed by genetic analysis. The arrow indicates the proband. All of the members shown in this figure except I:1 and I:2 took part in this project. The haplotype markers are shown at the left of each generation. The black and white bars depict the disease and non-disease associated haplotype, respectively. Haplotype analysis identified the causative gene as being between D17S921 and D17S800 on 17p12–21.2.

Genomic DNA preparation

We collected blood specimens (5 ml) in EDTA and extracted the genomic DNA from the peripheral blood leukocytes of the available family members using the Simgen Blood DNA mini kit (Simgen, Hangzhou, China).

Mutation screening

We used the functional candidate gene analysis approach. Gene specific PCR primers for CRYAA, CRYBA3/A1, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYGC, CRYGD, GJA3, GJA8, and MIP were designed flanking each exon and intron-exon junction. The cycling conditions for PCR were as follows: 95 °C preactivation for 5 min, 10 cycles of touchdown PCR with 1 °C down per cycle from 60 °C to 50 °C, followed by 25 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 25 s, annealing at 55 °C for 25 s and extension at 72 °C for 40 s, then finally extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Each reaction mix (25 µl) contained 50 ng of genomic DNA, 10× PCR buffer,1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 5 µmol each of sense and antisense primers (Table 1) and 2.5U of Taq DNA polymerase (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Thermal cycling was performed under suitable conditions using a C1000TM 48 well thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). PCR products were isolated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle sequencing kit V 3.1(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on an Applied Biosystems PRISM 3730 Sequence Analyzer, according to the manufacturer’s directions.

Table 1. Primers used in polymerase chain reaction of CRYBA3/A1.

Name Prime Sequence(5′-3′) Product length (bp)
Exon1F
AGCAAGCTGAGCCACCAAAG
308
Exon1R
GCTGTCTTCCGCCAGAGTTC
 
Exon2F
TCGTGTGTGCTCTGTCTTCC
205
Exon2R
CCCCTACAAACTGGGGTTTT
 
Exon3F
CATCAGGCATCCCAGGCTACA
333
Exon3R
TCCTTCTTCCCCTATCCCCAC
 
Exon4F
CGTCAACTCATTCCTCAACTCT
464
Exon4R
CAGGCTTAGAGAAGAAAGTGATGT
 
Exon5F
TTTCTCACAAATCTGTTGCCTTA
340
Exon5R
CAAAGTAACTCCTGAGGTTGCA
 
Exon6F
AGGCTCAGGTTTTGGGGTAT
471
Exon6R ACTCCAGCCTGAGCAACAAG  

Genotyping

We performed a partial genome scan in the vicinity of the CRYBA3/A1 locus, and chose the 10 fluorescent short tandem repeat polymorphic markers for this locus which are shown in Figure 1. Multiplex PCR was performed in a 20 μl reaction mixture containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.3 mM of each dNTP, 0.1 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 1 U HotStarTaq polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 3.0 mM MgCl2, and 1× HotStarTaq buffer. Samples were incubated in a thermocycler for 15 min at 95 °C and 20 s at 94 °C; the annealing temperature was programmed to initiate at 65 °C for 40 s and decrease 0.5 °C every cycle; then 68 °C for 2 min, for 11 cycles; followed by 94 °C for 20 s, 59 °C for 40 s, 68 °C for 2 min, for 24 cycles; a final extension at 60 °C for 1 h was performed. The PCR products were appropriately pooled and an aliquot was loaded onto a 5% standard denaturing polyacrylamide gel and run in an Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. The size of each allele was determined on the basis of an internal size standard (GeneScanTM −500 Liz Size Standard, Applied Biosystems) in each lane, and results were analyzed using the Applied Biosystems GeneMapper 4.0.

Linkage analysis and haplotyping

Multi-point linkage analysis was calculated using Merlin. A gene frequency of 0.0001 and penetrance of 100% were assumed. Microsatellite markers, allele frequencies, and recombination distances between the marker loci were based on the Marshfield database and the UCSC database. Family and haplotype data were processed using Cyrillic software (version 2.1; Cyrillic, Oxfordshire, UK).

Results

Clinical evaluation

We identified a four-generation Chinese family with a clear diagnosis of autosomal dominant childhood cataracts. Most affected individuals noticed their visual impairments before the age of twenty, and then their visual acuity decreased gradually until surgery was required to restore their visual function before the age of 40 (Figure 1). Opacity of the lens was bilateral in all of the affected individuals. The proband, who was a 28 year-old, had nuclear lactescent cataracts, ‘Y’ sutural opacities, and dot-like peripheral cortical opacities. His clinical features were almost the same as his brother (III:3). The affected member II:2, who was the mother of the proband, had more severe, curd-like cortical opacities, but her nuclear opacities were not much different from those of her sons. In the childhood stage before the age of ten, like IV:1, who was a 9 year-old, there was no opacity in the peripheral cortex, but there were mild opacities in the nucleus which had been first identified when he was three years old (Figure 2). After the age of 10, like the case of IV:2, who was a 12 year-old, certain fine, sand like opacities developed. The clinical evaluation of the affected individuals is provided in Table 2. Before surgery, the affected members had a visual acuity which ranged from finger counting to 20/100. After surgery, all the patients achieved a distance visual acuity of 20/25 to 20/20. There was no family history of other ocular or systemic abnormalities.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photographs of the eyes of the family members with congenital cataracts. A: The left eye of proband III:5. Diffuse illumination shows a fetal nuclear lactescent cataract with ‘Y’ sutural opacities and mild peripheral cortical opacities. B: Retroillumination showing the left eye of proband III:5. C: The right eye of II:2. Diffuse illumination shows denser peripheral cortical opacities, but the opacity of nucleus is almost the same as III:5. D: Retroillumination showing the right eye of proband II:2. E: The left eye of IV:1. Diffuse illumination shows only mild nuclear and sutural opacities. F: Retroillumination showing the left eye of proband IV:1.

Table 2. Clinical evaluation of affected individuals.

Affected individual Age at presentation Age at cataract surgery Phenotype
II:2
55
55
Nuclear lactescent cataract, ‘Y’ sutural opacities, severe curd-like peripheral cortical opacities
II:4
48
36
Had cataract surgery 12 years ago
II:6
45
35
Had cataract surgery 10 years ago
III:1
35
30
Had cataract surgery 5 years ago
III:3
33
28
Nuclear lactescent cataract, ‘Y’ sutural opacities, fine sand-like peripheral cortical opacities
III:5
28
28
Nuclear lactescent cataract, ‘Y’ sutural opacities, fine sand-like peripheral cortical opacities
III:6
25
22
Had cataract surgery 3 years ago
IV:1
9
No surgery
Mild nuclear opacities with sutural opacities
IV:2 12 No surgery Nuclear opacities with sutural opacities, a few dot-like cortical opacities

Genetic analysis

Through gene sequencing we identified a single base substitution in the donor splice site of intron 3 in CRYBA3/A1 (IVS3+1 G>A) which cosegregated with all affected individuals, whereas this heterozygous mutation was not present in the unaffected family members, and also 100 unrelated Chinese without cataracts serving as a control (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Partial DNA sequence of CRYBA3/A1 from one normal and one affected individual, showing a heterozygous mutation (IVS3+1 G>A) in the third canonical GT site of CRYBA3/A1 (black triangles). The black vertical line denotes the normal exon 3-intron 3 donor splice site.

Linkage and haplotype analysis

Genescan and linkage analysis were carried out by using 10 microsatellite markers flanking the CRYBA3/A1 gene, and positive results were obtained, including the maximum HLOD score 3.005 at D17S1800 (α=1.000; Table 3). Haplotype analysis showed that the affected individuals in the family shared a common haplotype, with a region flanked by the markers D17S921 and D17S800 at 17p12–21.2 containing CRYBA3/A1.

Table 3. Multi-point linkage analysis between chromosome 17 DNA markers.

Locus Position (CM) LOD α HLOD
D17S799
31.960
1.485
1.000
1.485
D17S900/921
36.140
−6.484
0.000
0.000
D17S805
47.000
3.003
1.000
3.003
D17S1800
51.630
3.005
1.000
3.005
D17S1293
56.480
3.003
1.000
3.003
D17S1836
60.400
2.459
1.000
2.459
D17S800
62.010
−6.780
0.000
0.000
D17S1861
63.620
−6.603
0.000
0.000
D17S1817 103.530 −17.703 0.000 0.000

Discussion

The genes which are reported to cause cataract-specific mutations include those of the crystallins, cytoskeletal proteins, membrane proteins, transcription factors, and chromatin modifying protein-4B [35]. Among the reported genes, the crystallins are of special interest because they encode the major proportion of water soluble structural proteins of the lens fiber cells. The human lens contains α-, β-, and γ-crystallins, of which the β-crystallins comprise the greatest part.

Thus far, three identified mutations in CRYBA3/A1 gene have been associated with autosomal dominant cataract phenotypes of either a congenital or childhood nature. One is the IVS3+1 G>A mutation (position 474, GenBank M14303) which we reported [8,21,31], another is IVS3+1 G>C [30], and a third is a 3-bp deletion at positions 279–281 in exon 4 (279delGAG) [32,33]. Furthermore, the mutation IVS3+1 G>A has been found in 5 additional families. Kannabiran et al. [8] reported an Indian pedigree in which the phenotype was zonular cataracts with sutural opacities, Another two Indian pedigrees were reported by Devi et al. [31] with the phenotype of zonular lamellar opacities. An Australian family was reported by Burdon et al. [21] having the clinical features of Y-sutural opacities, mild opacification throughout the region of the fetal nucleus, and peripheral cortical dot opacities, and Gu et al. [34] identified a Chinese family with posterior polar cataracts, which was the first time this mutation was found in the Chinese population. Although the nuclear, sutural, and cortical cataracts were also found in the Australian family, the clinical features we observed were still distinctly different. First, in the family we studied, the nuclear cataracts in the affected individuals are progressive. Mild nuclear opacities with sutural opacities first appear at approximately 3 years of age, and progress thereafter. After 20 years of age, the nuclear opacities deteriorate so as to become lactescent, and thus become the main factor influencing the visual acuity. Second, the cortical cataracts in our case are also progressive. The fine, sand-like peripheral cortical opacities are observed just after 10 years of age, and progress with a trend of increasing and aggregating. After the age of 50 years they are almost curd-like. Fortunately, these cataracts in childhood are so mild that they exert little negative effect on visual development. After surgery, all of the patients achieved good visual acuity.

The related gene CRYBA3/A1 is located in 17q11.2 (GeneID: 1411), which is a member of crystallin family, encoding two proteins (βA3-crystallin and βA1-crystallin) from a single mRNA. The latter protein is 17 amino acids shorter than βA3-crystallin and is generated by use of an alternate translation initiation site. Seven protein regions exist in βA1/A3-crystallin: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and NH2- and COOH-terminal extensions. Each motif is a Greek key of four β-strands and consists of approximately 40 amino acid residues. The CRYBA3/A1 gene consists of six exons [36]. In the CRYBA3/A1 gene, the four Greek key motifs are approximately encoded by exons 3 to 6 [37]. Splice-site mutations were reported to result in exon skipping, activation of cryptic splice sites, creation of a pseudo-exon within an intron, or intron retention, among which exon skipping is the most frequent outcome [38]. The donor splice site of intron 3 of CRYBA3/A1 (position 474) is the first nucleotide in the invariant GT dinucleotide of the 59 splice junction consensus sequence [30]. Due to the mutation IVS3+1 G>A, as we previously reported, the very next codon within the retained intron 3 would be a UGA stop site, which mimics a missense mutation at the protein level. Although the surveillance of mRNAs for transcripts that cannot be completely translated leads to their rapid degradation by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) [39], transcripts of the IVS3+1 G>A of CRYBA3/A1 probably escape the NMD pathway, and the premature termination codon (PTC) would cause truncation of the βA1/A3-crystallin immediately after the first motif. Since the Greek key motifs are formed with the fourth strand of the first motif being provided by the second motif and vice versa, without the second motif encoded by exon 4, it would not be possible to form even a single Greek key structure [40]. Due to the loss of exons 3 and 4 in CRYBA3/A1 mRNA, a βA1/A3-crystallin species is suggested which contains only the COOH-terminal globular domain [8]. Gupta et al. [41] constructed eight deletion mutants of βA1/A3-crystallin and found that the deletion of exon 3 and exon 4 caused major structural instability, leading to the insolubilization of βA1/A3-crystallin. However there is as yet insufficient research in this field, and the nature of the complex mechanism remains to be determined.

In conclusion, we have identified a progressive form of congenital cataracts associated with the IVS3+1 G>A mutation of CRYBA3/A1 in a Chinese family. This is the first report to relate this mutation to progressive cataracts. This study highlights the physiologic importance of βA1/A3-crystallin and supports the role of CRYBA3/A1 in human cataract formation.

Acknowledgments

We thank the family members for participating in the project. This work was supported by Eleventh Five Year Plan Period (2006BAI02B04), Program for Zhejiang Key Innovative Research Team (2009R50039) and Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province, China (2008C23075).

References

  • 1.Francis PJ, Berry V, Bhattacharya SS, Moore AT. The genetics of childhood cataract. J Med Genet. 2000;37:481–8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.7.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ionides A, Francis P, Berry V, Mackay D, Bhattacharya S, Shiels A, Moore A. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in autosomal dominant cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:802–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.7.802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hejtmancik JF. Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19:134–49. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Billingsley G, Santhiya ST, Paterson AD, Ogata K, Wodak S, Hosseini SM, Manisastry SM, Vijayalakshmi P, Gopinath PM, Graw J, Héon E. CRYBA4, a novel human cataract gene, is also involved in microphthalmia. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:702–9. doi: 10.1086/507712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Santana A, Waiswol M, Arcieri ES, Cabral de Vasconcellos JP, Barbosa de Melo M. Mutation analysis of CRYAA, CRYGC, and CRYGD associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in Brazilian families. Mol Vis. 2009;15:793–800. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vanita V, Singh JR, Singh D, Varon R, Sperling K. Novel mutation in the gamma-S crystallin gene causing autosomal dominant cataract. Mol Vis. 2009;15:476–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu M, Ke T, Wang Z, Yang Q, Chang W, Jiang F, Tang Z, Li H, Ren X, Wang X, Wang T, Li Q, Yang J, Liu J, Wang QK. Identification of a CRYAB mutation associated with autosomal dominant posterior polar cataract in a Chinese family. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3461–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kannabiran C, Rogan PK, Olmos L, Basti S, Rao GN, Kaiser-Kupfer M, Hejtmancik JF. Autosomal dominant zonular cataract with sutural opacities is associated with a splice mutation in the bA3/A1-crystallin gene. Mol Vis. 1998;4:21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li FF, Zhu SQ, Wang SZ, Gao C, Huang SZ, Zhang M, Ma X. Nonsense mutation in the CRYBB2 gene causing autosomal dominant progressive polymorphic congenital coronary cataracts. Mol Vis. 2008;14:750–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang J, Zhu Y, Gu F, He X, Cao Z, Li X, Tong Y, Ma X. A novel nonsense mutation in CRYBB1 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract. Mol Vis. 2008;14:727–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guleria K, Sperling K, Singh D, Varon R, Singh JR, Vanita V. A novel mutation in the connexin 46 (GJA3) gene associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in an Indian family. Mol Vis. 2007;13:1657–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vanita V, Singh JR, Singh D, Varon R, Sperling K. A mutation in GJA8 (p.P88Q) is associated with “balloon-like” cataract with Y-sutural opacities in a family of Indian origin. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1171–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bu L, Jin Y, Shi Y, Chu R, Ban A, Eiberg H, Andres L, Jiang H, Zheng G, Qian M, Cui B, Xia Y, Liu J, Hu L, Zhao G, Hayden MR, Kong X. Mutant DNA-binding domain of HSF4 is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar and Marner cataract. Nat Genet. 2002;31:276–8. doi: 10.1038/ng921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang J, Jin C, Wang W, Tang X, Shentu X, Wu R, Wang Y, Xia K, Yao K. Identification of a novel splice-site mutation in MIP in a Chinese congenital cataract family. Mol Vis. 2009;15:38–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berry V, Francis P, Kaushal S, Moore A, Bhattacharya S. Missense mutations in MIP underlie autosomal dominant 'polymorphic' and lamellar cataracts linked to 12q. Nat Genet. 2000;25:15–7. doi: 10.1038/75538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jakobs PM, Hess JF, FitzGerald PG, Kramer P, Weleber RG, Litt M. Autosomal-dominant congenital cataract associated with a deletion mutation in the human beaded filament protein gene BFSP2. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1432–6. doi: 10.1086/302872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Finzi S, Li Y, Mitchell TN, Farr A, Maumenee IH, Sallum JM, Sundin O. Posterior polar cataract: genetic analysis of a large family. Ophthalmic Genet. 2005;26:125–30. doi: 10.1080/13816810500229124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Knopf HL, Yamada K, Yoshiura K, Niikawa N, Shim S, Hanson PI. CHMP4B, a novel gene for autosomal dominant cataracts linked to chromosome 20q. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:596–606. doi: 10.1086/519980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Knopf HL, Maraini G, Li A, Jiao X, Hejtmancik JF. The EPHA2 gene is associated with cataracts linked to chromosome 1p. Mol Vis. 2008;14:2042–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mackay DS, Andley UP, Shiels A. Cell death triggered by a novel mutation in the alphaA-crystallin gene underlies autosomal dominant cataract linked to chromosome 21q. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11:784–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burdon KP, Wirth MG, Mackey DA, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, Elder JE, Dickinson JL, Sale MM. Investigation of crystallin genes in familial cataract, and report of two disease associated mutations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:79–83. doi: 10.1136/bjo.88.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pauli S, Söker T, Klopp N, Illig T, Engel W, Graw J. Mutation analysis in a German family identified a new cataract-causing allele in the CRYBB2 gene. Mol Vis. 2007;13:962–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ren Z, Li A, Shastry BS, Padma T, Ayyagari R, Scott MH, Parks MM, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Hejtmancik JF. A 5-base insertion in the gammaC-crystallin gene is associated with autosomal dominant variable zonular pulverulent cataract. Hum Genet. 2000;106:531–7. doi: 10.1007/s004390000289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Messina-Baas OM, Gonzalez-Huerta LM, Cuevas-Covarrubias SA. Two affected siblings with nuclear cataract associated with a novel missense mutation in the CRYGD gene. Mol Vis. 2006;12:995–1000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burdon KP, Wirth MG, Mackey DA, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, Elder JE, Dickinson JL, Sale MM. A novel mutation in the Connexin 46 gene causes autosomal dominant congenital cataract with incomplete penetrance. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e106. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.018333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma ZW, Zheng JQ, Li J, Li XR, Tang X, Yuan XY, Zhang XM, Sun HM. Two novel mutations of connexin genes in Chinese families with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1535–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jakobs PM, Hess JF, FitzGerald PG, Kramer P, Weleber RG, Litt M. Autosomal-dominant congenital cataract associated with a deletion mutation in the human beaded filament protein gene BFSP2. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1432–6. doi: 10.1086/302872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geyer DD, Spence MA, Johannes M, Flodman P, Clancy KP, Berry R, Sparkes RS, Jonsen MD, Isenberg SJ, Bateman JB. Novel single-base deletional mutation in major intrinsic protein (MIP)in autosomal dominant cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:761–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Forshew T, Johnson CA, Khaliq S, Pasha S, Willis C, Abbasi R, Tee L, Smith U, Trembath RC, Mehdi SQ, Moore AT, Maher ER. Locus heterogeneity in autosomal recessive congenital cataracts: linkage to 9q and germline HSF4 mutations. Hum Genet. 2005;117:452–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-005-1309-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bateman JB, Geyer DD, Flodman P, Johannes M, Sikela J, Walter N, Moreira AT, Clancy K, Spence MA. A New bA1-Crystallin Splice Junction Mutation in Autosomal Dominant Cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3278–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Devi RR, Yao W, Vijayalakshmi P, Sergeev YV, Sundaresan P, Hejtmancik JF. Crystallin gene mutations in Indian families with inherited pediatric cataract. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1157–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ferrini W, Schorderet DF, Othenin-Girard P, Uffer S, Héon E, Munier FL. CRYBA3/A1 Gene Mutation Associated with Suture-Sparing Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataract: A Novel Phenotype. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1436–41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu S, Zhao C, Jiao H, Kere J, Tang X, Zhao F, Zhang X, Zhao K, Larsson C. Two Chinese families with pulverulent congenital cataracts and ΔG91 CRYBA1 mutations. Mol Vis. 2007;13:1154–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gu Z, Ji B, Wan C, He G, Zhang J, Zhang M, Feng G, He L, Gao L. A splice site mutation in CRYBA1/A3 causing autosomal dominant posterior polar cataract in a Chinese pedigree. Mol Vis. 2010;16:154–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Genetic origins of cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:165–73. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hogg D, Tsui LC, Gorin M, Breitman ML. Characterization of the human beta-crystallin gene Hu beta A3/A1 reveals ancestral relationships among the beta gamma-crystallin superfamily. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:12420–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Werten PJ, Carver JA, Jaenicke R, de Jong WW. The elusive role of the N-terminal extension of beta A3- and beta A1-crystallin. Protein Eng. 1996;9:1021–8. doi: 10.1093/protein/9.11.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakai K, Sakamoto H. Construction of a novel database containing aberrant splicing mutations of mammalian genes. Gene. 1994;141:171–7. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90567-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mort M, Ivanov D, Cooper DN, Chuzhanova NA. A meta-analysis of nonsense mutations causing human genetic disease. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1037–47. doi: 10.1002/humu.20763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Blundell T, Lindley P, Miller L, Moss D, Slingsby C, Tickle I, Turnell B, Wistow G. The molecular structure and stability of the eye lens: x-ray analysis of gamma-crystallin II. Nature. 1981;289:771–7. doi: 10.1038/289771a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gupta R, Srivastava K, Srivastava OP. Truncation of Motifs III and IV in Human Lens âA3-Crystallin Destabilizes the Structure. Biochemistry. 2006;45:9964–78. doi: 10.1021/bi060499v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES