Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.030

Table 2.

Prediction of 5-year risk of geographic atrophy by risk score involving 5 risk factors (N=942 patients)

Endpoint GA CGA Any size GA

GA risk score N In either eye (n=64) In untreated eye (n=45) In either eye (n=90) In untreated eye (n=68) In either eye (n=324) In untreated eye (n=214)
0–6 165 1 (0.60) 0 (0.00) 2 (1.21) 1 (0.61) 21 (12.7) 13 (7.88)
7–8 205 7 (3.41) 4 (1.95) 5 (2.44) 4 (1.95) 57 (27.8) 34 (16.6)
9 150 6 (4.00) 3 (2.00) 12 (8.00) 9 (6.00) 48 (32.0) 35 (23.3)
10 99 6 (6.06) 4 (4.04) 11 (11.1) 7 (7.07) 34 (34.3) 19 (19.2)
11 98 11 (11.2) 8 (8.16) 17 (17.4) 12 (12.2) 45 (45.9) 29 (29.6)
12 128 20 (15.6) 15 (11.7) 21 (16.4) 15 (11.7) 61 (47.7) 45 (35.2)
>12 97 13 (13.4) 11 (11.3) 22 (22.7) 20 (20.6) 58 (59.8) 39 (40.2)
AUC (95% CI*) 0.76 (0.71–0.81) 0.79 (0.75–0.84) 0.76 (0.71–0.80) 0.77 (0.72–0.81) 0.68 (0.65–0.72) 0.68 (0.64–0.72)

AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; GA = geographic atrophy; CGA = GA involving the foveal center; CI = Confidence interval.

*

Based on the bootstrap of 2000 samples.