Skip to main content
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 2010 Sep 24;62(6):483–488. doi: 10.1007/s10616-010-9306-9

A modified enrichment protocol for adult caprine skeletal muscle stem cell

Ajai K Tripathi 1,✉, Umed V Ramani 1, Viral B Ahir 1, Dharamshi N Rank 2, Chaitanya G Joshi 1
PMCID: PMC2995141  PMID: 20865326

Abstract

To establish an adequate model to study the proliferation and differentiation of adult caprine skeletal muscle in response to bioactive compounds, a pool of satellite cells (SC) was derived from the rectus abdominis muscle of adult goat. Skeletal muscle contains a population of adult stem cells, named as satellite cells that reside beneath the basal lamina of skeletal muscle fiber and other populations of cells. These SC are multipotent stem cells, since cells cultured in the presence of specific cell lineage inducing cocktails can differentiate into several types of mesenchymal lineage, such as osteocytes and adipocytes. In the present study, we have developed a modified protocol for isolating satellite cells (>90%) and examined their myogenic and contractile properties in vitro.

Keywords: Caprine, Satellite cells, Goat, Multipotent

Introduction

Cell culture is a common method for the investigation of cells from various tissues. It has been proven to be an invaluable technique for researchers exploring mechanisms of animal growth and development, which allows us to separate these interactions and more clearly examine the cell’s nutritional, hormonal and environmental requirements for maintenance, proliferation and differentiation (Mcfarland 1992).

Skeletal muscle contains several types of stem cells, including satellite cells (SC) that reside beneath the basal lamina and plasma membranes of skeletal muscle fibers in vivo (Charge and Rudnicki 2004). Adult skeletal SC have long been considered as myogenic lineage-committed cells with either self-renewing or differentiating into multinucleated myotubes in vitro and are mitotically quiescent. They can be activated during muscular growth and traumatic regeneration. When challenged by mitogens, such as fetal bovine serum after extirpation into culture, they are activated and proliferate to produce progeny (myoblasts). After differentiation, they fuse to form multinucleated cells (myotubes) (Chen et al. 2005). Recent observations in rodents and humans indicate that skeletal muscle stem cells (both SC and the cells in the interstitial spaces of skeletal muscle) possess the capability not only to be myogenic stem cells but also to be multipotent stem cells, since cells cultured in the presence of specific cell lineage inducing cocktails can differentiate into several types of mesenchymal lineage, such as osteocytes and adipocytes (Asakura et al. 2001; Wada et al. 2002).

In vitro growth of skeletal muscle is controlled by several growth factors like fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and its alternative splicing variant (Kawada et al. 2001). The skeletal muscle is known to be a complex object containing various mononuclear cells capable of in vitro cultivation. These include fibroblasts (connective tissue), various blood vessel cells, adipocytes, and the proper muscle SC. That is why obtaining a pure SC culture remains a complex problem and requires special procedures. A number of approaches have been proposed to solve this problem: (1) separation of the cells by sedimentation rate or attachment to the plastic surface (Anderson 2000; Springer et al. 1997); (2) getting rid of the present fibroblasts by flow cytometry using a cell sorter (Linge et al. 1989); and (3) using special (selective) media (containing D-valine, growth factors, etc.) (Rando and Blau 1994). However, due to various complications, the real purity of the obtained myoblast cultures can be low (Terekhov et al. 2001).

Despite the accumulated evidence showing the presence of stem cells harboring mesenchymal multipotency in the skeletal muscle of rodents and humans, few studies have been reported regarding the multipotency of small ruminants particularly of caprine muscle cells. There are many different procedures and media for the cultivation of myogenic cells derived from large mammals like sheep or cattle (Dodson et al. 1987; Roe et al. 1989), but there is only a few reports for the establishment and characterization of caprine myogenic cell (Yamanouchi et al. 2007, 2009). There are reportes that myoblasts grow better in F10 media than in DMEM or other media as it gives advantages over contaminating fibroblast (Springer et al. 1997). Through the combination and improvement of different protocols given in the above mentioned literature, we developed a protocol that enables to establish a myogenic cell pool highly enriched for myoblasts/satellite cells and to study the proliferation, differentiation and contractile properties of caprine myoblasts in response to a variety of factors under different media conditions.

Materials and methods

Isolation of caprine satellite cells

To establish an in vitro system of caprine myoblasts from muscle SC for various types of investigations, goat rectus abdominis muscle (RA) tissue was collected from slaughter house with all aseptic precautions in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS, calcium- and magnesium free, Sigma) and transported to laboratory. Tissues were digested to release myogenic cells according to modification of a protocol described previously by Springer et al. (1997) and Mau et al. (2008) (Fig. 1). Briefly, connective tissue was removed and muscles were minced to a slurry in a minimal quantity of enriched D-PBS (50 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 5 μg/mL gentamycin) and digested twice with 0.10% trypsin (Sigma) for one hr each at 37 °C, with inversion every 15 min. Samples were triturated for 10 min, and enzyme action was stopped by 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). After filtering the cell suspension through sterile muslin cloth, it was pelleted by centrifugation (1,200 rpm for 10 min) at room temperature and supernatant was discarded. Cell pellet was suspended in F10 medium without serum and plated in a sterile 90 mm Petri dish (Axygen) and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After 3 h of incubation, without disturbing sediment action, supernatant was collected, centrifuged (1,200 rpm for 10 min) and precursor cells were counted by a hemocytometer before seeding at a concentration of approximately 1 × 106 cells/mL into a 25 cm2 culture flask (Corning) in 10 ml growth medium [F10, containing with 200 mM glutamine, 50 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 5 μg/mL gentamycin, 5 μg/mL insulin (Sigma) and 10% FBS]. All incubations were performed at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The medium collected after 4–5 days of incubation was having mostly unattached myogenic precursor cells. This supernatant medium was centrifuged to collect unattached SC (1,200 rpm for 10 min), and the pellet was suspended in two ml of D-PBS. These unattached SC were again enriched by using a Percoll (Sigma–Aldrich) gradient (Roe et al. 1989). After washing the SC band with D-PBS, it was diluted with growth medium containing 5 ng/mL bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor) and seeded in 25 cm2 culture flask again. Subsequently, medium was changed approximately 2× per week until growth foci were seen, which were not allowed to over grow and monolayers were harvested with 0.10% trypsin. Aliquots of the cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen until required in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma) and 90% FBS. Later on, aliquots of the SC were thawed at the beginning of each experiment, excessive DMSO was washed out by a single centrifugation step (1,000 rpm, 10 min, RT), and cells were subsequently seeded in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks with F10 + 10% FBS and other growth factors (insulin, bFGF).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Isolation of satellite cells from the rectus abdominis muscle of adult goat in modification to Mau et al. (2008), Springer et al. (1997) and Roe et al. (1989)

For proliferation study, cells were counted with a cell cycle analyzer (CCA) system (Partec) as per manufacturer’s instruction. In brief, cells were trypsinized, pelleted, lysed in cell lysis solution and then counterstained by nuclear staining solution, which were then counted with a CCA.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were subjected to indirect immunofluorescence for detection of desmin as it is only present in muscle fiber (SC, myoblast, fused myotubes) and not in any other tissue (Yamanouchi et al. 2007). In brief, after fixation in ice cold methanol, the cells were washed 3 times with PBS and then blocked with 5% normal goat serum (NGS)/PBS (Sigma) for 20 min at RT. After blocking, the cells were washed 3 times with PBS and then reacted with anti-desmin (mouse, clone DE-U-10, Sigma, 1:400 dilution) primary antibodies for 2 h at RT. After 3 washes again with PBS, the cells were incubated with AlexaFluor conjugated-secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT followed by counterstaining of nuclei with DAPI (Lonza). Observations were made using a fluorescence microscope (LEICA DMIL) equipped with a digital camera. All primary antibodies and AlexaFluor conjugated-secondary antibodies were diluted with 5% NGS/PBS (1:400).

Results and discussion

Cultivation of proliferating and differentiating caprine myoblasts

Primarily murine and avian myoblast cultures have been widely used to study the proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. However, data originating from these systems may not be directly transferable to studies of skeletal muscle growth and differentiation in meat-producing animals (Hembree et al. 1991). So the aims of the present study were to isolate and establish a culture system for goat skeletal muscle stem cells and to examine their myogenic and contractile properties in vitro.

Desmin, one of the intermediate filaments, has shown to be a useful marker for identifying proliferating SC (adult myoblasts) in many species (Dodson et al. 1996). Therefore, an indirect immunofluorescent analysis for the expression of desmin was carried out to find out the proportion of isolated SC. Muscle dissociation and isolation processes were found to release mainly two types of cell population consisting mostly of SC and a smaller proportion of nonmyogenic cells. Since the attachment of SC to the tissue culture plate is slower than that of the accompanying nonmyogenic cells, preplating was done to select SC, which resulted into 65–70% desmin positive population in comparison to percoll gradient separation of SC (75–80%) at time of muscle tissue trypsinization. Whereas our modified protocol produces populations that consist of >90% SC without addition or any other selecting medium of chemical compound and we found no difference in the subsequent growth and fusion behavior of myoblasts.

Proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle stem cells are under the control of several growth factors and is a highly controlled multi-step process. Amongst these growth factors, bFGF is a well-characterized regulatory factor that is indispensable in the control of myogenesis (Charge and Rudnicki 2004). In general, bFGF is known to enhance proliferation of myogenic cells and to strongly suppress their terminal differentiation. This has been shown in several species, including murine (Allen and Boxhorn 1989), equine (Byrne et al. 2000), and avian species (McFarland 1999; Velleman et al. 2004).

In order to evaluate the effect of insulin and bFGF on goat skeletal muscle stem cells, the cells were cultured in 10% FBS/F10, with/or without insulin (5 μg/mL), bFGF (5 ng/mL) for 6 days. For proliferation studies, cells were seeded with a cell number of 1.2 × 104 cells per well into 24 well culture plates (Corning) and incubated with F10 + 10% FBS, F10 + insuln + 10% FBS, F10 + insulin + bFGF + 10% FBS for 6 days. Addition of bFGF strongly enhanced growth of myoblast (N = 4, p < 0.01, Fig. 2). The effect of insulin was not as much as observed by Yamanouchi et al. (2007), however in combination with bFGF, it was significantly higher. In this regard, however, it should be noted that Dodson and Mathison (1988) had reported insulin promoted proliferation of ovine SC, while it did not promote that of rat SC and suggested species differences in the responsiveness of SC to hormones and/or growth factors. Allen and Boxhorn (1989) also reported that insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) stimulate proliferation to a small degree but demonstrated a more pronounced stimulation of differentiation and maximum stimulation of proliferation in the presence of both FGF and IGF-I.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Relationship between myoblast monolayer growth and growth-stimulating admixtures in the culture medium

For differentiation study, cells were seeded with a cell number of 1.5 × 105 per well in a 6 well culture plate (Corning) in reduced serum MEM (Hyclone) and 10% FBS. We noticed that there were no fusions when F10 medium was being used (Fig. 3a) as only a monolayer was formed. In MEM medium, once cells reached confluence, they started fusing and formed multi-nucleated myotubes which were formed on top of the monolayer of other contaminating cells (Fig. 3b, c). After 10–12 days, many fused myotubes started exhibiting frequent spontaneous twitching which were independent of other fused myotubes (Online Resource 1). During this period, medium was replaced once a week. 10 days after fusion, striation started appearing on myotubes (Fig. 3d). So far not too many reports are available for myoblast fusion and their contraction especially in caprine myoblast culture. Clair et al. (1992) reported similar cross-striation and frequent spontaneous twitching in human myoblast culture when these cells were grown in a serum free medium, MCDB 120, contain insulin, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and bovine serum albumin (BSA). Das et al. (2006) have reported similar fusion and contraction in mouse myotubes in a serum free medium. Mau et al. (2008) have reported fusion events in porcine myoblast culture in DMEM +10% FBS +10% HS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Differentiation of caprine myoblasts into myotubes. a Proliferating myoblasts were prepared for differentiation in F10 growth medium with 10% FBS by the addition of 5 μg/mL of insulin and 5 ng/mL bFGF (H&E stain). b Cell culture in MEM after 48 h, short myotubes are formed (H&E stain). c After 72 h in differentiating medium, numerous myotubes are apparent. d Striations in fused myotubes (5 days after fusion). Bar = 100 μm

Proliferating myoblasts and fused myotubes were confirmed with desmin immunostaining as desmin has only been reported in myoblast and myotubes but not contaminating nonmyogenic cells (Fig. 4a, b). Of the myogenic marker examined, species differences in the expression of desmin in adult myoblasts (proliferating SC) have been noted previously. Allen and Boxhorn (1989) showed that desmin is expressed in proliferating rat SC but not in proliferating bovine SC. Yablonka-Reuveni and Nameroff (1990) noted that the progeny of adult myoblasts in the chicken exhibit more desmin-expressing cells than embryonic myoblasts do. We have also noticed that the desmin expression level also varies between chicken embryonic myoblast cells (unpublished report).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Combined staining of a caprine myoblast culture differentiated in MEM (reduced serum) medium for (a) desmin using an antidesmin antibody and (b) DNA by DAPI. Multinucleated myotubes are desmin-positive by green fluorescence; nuclei exhibit blue fluorescence. This staining can be used to determine the degree of fusion as the percentage of nuclei located within myotubes. Bar = 100 μm

In conclusion, we have found that SC remain unattached even after four-five days since first plating, as these cells have still capacity to proliferate and differentiate into contractile myotubes. The proliferating and differentiating cultures grown under the described conditions are eminently suitable to study the effects of various bioactive compounds like nutrients, hormones, and growth factors. Likewise, the hereby provided protocols should be easily adaptable to isolate and cultivate myoblasts derived from various caprine skeletal muscles and from fetal, postnatal and adult stages of development. Establishment of this culture system will be of value in elucidating the mechanisms that control growth/differentiation of stem cells in ruminant skeletal muscle.

Acknowledgment

We thank National Agriculture Innovation Project, Indian council of Agricultural Research (NAIP-ICAR), Government of India, for their financial support during this study.

References

  1. Allen RE, Boxhorn LK. Regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta, insulin-like growth factor I, and fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Physiol. 1989;138:311–315. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041380213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson JE. A role for nitric oxide in muscle repair: Oxide-mediated activation of muscle satellite cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1859–1874. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.5.1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asakura A, Komaki M, Rudnicki M. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation. 2001;68:245–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne KM, Vierck J, Dodson MV. In vitro model of equine muscle regeneration. Equine Vet J. 2000;32:401–405. doi: 10.2746/042516400777591020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charge SB, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:209–238. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen X, Mao Z, Liu S, Liu H, Wang X, Wu H, Wu Y, Zhao T, Fan W, Li Y, Yew DT, Kindler PM, Li L, He Q, Qian L, Wang X, Fan M. Dedifferentiation of adult human myoblasts induced by ciliary neurotrophic factor in vitro. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:3140–3151. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clair JA, Meyer-Demarest SD, Ham RG. Improved medium with EGF and BSA for differentiated human skeletal muscle cells. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15(7):774–779. doi: 10.1002/mus.880150705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Das M, Gregory CA, Molnara P, Riedela LM, Wilsona K, Hickman JJ. A defined system to allow skeletal muscle differentiation and subsequent integration with silicon microstructures. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4374–4380. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dodson MV, Mathison BA. Comparison of ovine and rat muscle-derived satellite cells: response to insulin. Tissue Cell. 1988;20:909–918. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(88)90032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dodson MV, Martin EL, Brannon MA, Mathison BA, McFarland DC. Optimization of bovine satellite cell-derived myotube formation in vitro. Tissue Cell. 1987;19:159–166. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(87)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dodson MV, McFarland DC, Grant AL, Doumit ME, Velleman SG. Extrinsic regulation of domestic animal derived satellite cells. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1996;13:107–126. doi: 10.1016/0739-7240(95)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hembree JR, Hathaway MR, Dayton WR. Isolation and culture of fetal porcine myogenic cells and the effect of insulin, IGF-I, and sera on protein turnover in porcine myotube cultures. J Anim Sci. 1991;69:3241–3250. doi: 10.2527/1991.6983241x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kawada S, Tachi C, Ishii N. Content and localization of myostatin in mouse skeletal muscles during aging, mechanical unloading and reloading. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2001;22:627–633. doi: 10.1023/A:1016366409691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Linge C, Green MR, Brooks RF. A method for removal fibroblasts from Human tissue culture systems. Exp Cell Res. 1989;185:519–528. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90320-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mau M, Oksbjerg N, Rehfeldt C. Establishment and conditions for growth and differentiation of a myoblast cell line derived from the semimembranosus muscle of newborn piglets. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2008;44:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11626-007-9069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mcfarland DC (1992) Cell culture as a tool for the study of poultry skeletal muscle development. The Journal of Nutrition. Conference: understanding growth and development, pp 818–829 [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. McFarland DC. Influence of growth factors on poultry myogenic satellite cells. Poult Sci. 1999;78:747–758. doi: 10.1093/ps/78.5.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rando TA, Blau HM. Primary mouse myoblast purification, characterization and transplantation for cell-mediated gene-therapy. J Cell Biol. 1994;125:1275–1287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roe JA, Harper JM, Buttery PJ. Protein metabolism in ovine primary muscle cultures derived from satellite cells-effects of selected peptide hormones and growth factors. J Endocrinol. 1989;122:565–571. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1220565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Springer ML, Rando T, Blau HM. Isolation and growth of mouse primary myoblasts. “Gene delivery to muscle”. In: Boyle AL, editor. Current protocols in human genetics. Unit 13.4. Wiley: New York; 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Terekhov SM, Krokhina TB, Shishkin SS, Krakhmaleva IN, Zakharov SF, Ershova ES. Human myoblast culture as muscle stem cells in medical and biological studies. Biol Bull. 2001;28(6):630–635. doi: 10.1023/A:1012380505528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Velleman SG, Liu X, Coy CS, McFarland DC. Effects of syndecan-1 and glypican on muscle cell proliferation and differentiation: implications for possible functions during myogenesis. Poult Sci. 2004;83:1020–1027. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.6.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wada MR, Inagawa-Ogashiwa M, Shimizu S, Yasumoto S, Hashimoto N. Generation of different fates from multipotent muscle stem cells. Development. 2002;129:2987–2995. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.12.2987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Nameroff M. Temporal differences in desmin expression between myoblasts from embryonic and adult chicken skeletal muscle. Differentiation. 1990;45:21–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1990.tb00452.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yamanouchi K, Hosoyama T, Murakami Y, Nishihara M. Myogenic and adipogenic properties of goat skeletal muscle stem cells. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:51–58. doi: 10.1262/jrd.18094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yamanouchi K, Hosoyama T, Murakami Y, Nakano S, Nishihara M. Satellite cell differentiation in goat skeletal muscle single fiber culture. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55:252–255. doi: 10.1262/jrd.20175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES