Abstract
Objective:
To investigate the effect of the methanolic extract of Erythrina variegata (Linn.) var Orientalis (Fabaceae) seeds (MEEV) in reducing the cholesterol levels and as well as antioxidant in experimentally induced hyperlipidemic rats.
Materials and Methods:
Doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg of the extract were evaluated for its effect on lipid profile, HMG-CoA reductase, and on antioxidant enzymes in high-fat diet (HFD) induced hyperlipidemia.
Results and Conclusion:
The elevated levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and very low density lipoprotein due to HFD was reduced by concurrent treatment with MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg) significantly (P<0.001). A significant reduction (P<0.001) in high-density lipoprotein was noticed in HFD fed groups; however, a nonsignificant increment was produced by the administration of MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg). The HMG-CoA reductase activity was increased in HFD fed animals significantly (P<0.001) and was reduced by MEEV 400 mg/kg significantly (P<0.001). There was a noticed increase in the body weight and mesenteric fat pad weight in HFD fed group (P<0.001), which was reduced by the administration of MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg). The antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and catalase were reduced significantly in the HFD fed group, whose levels were increased significantly (P<0.001) by the administration of MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg). Lipid peroxidation was increased in HFD fed animals, which was reduced significantly (P<0.001) by the treatment with MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg).
Keywords: Antioxidant enzymes, Erythrina variegata, high fat diet, HMG-CoA reductase, lipid profile, β-sitosterol
Hyperlipidemia has been ranked as one of the greatest risk factors contributing to the prevalence and severity of coronary heart disease.[1] Coronary heart disease, stroke, atherosclerosis, and hyperlipidemia are the primary cause of death in developed countries.[2] Hyperlipidemia is characterized by elevated serum total cholesterol, low-density (LDL) and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL) with decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Hyperlipidemia-associated lipid disorders are considered to cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.[3] Among these hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia are closely related to ischemic heart disease.[4] The main aim of the treatment in patients with hyperlipidemia is to reduce the risk of developing ischemic heart disease or the occurrence of further cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease.[5] Currently available hypolipidemic drugs have been associated with a number of side effects.[6] The consumption of synthetic drugs leads to hyperuricemia, diarrhea, nausea, myositis, gastric irritation, flushing, dry skin and abnormal liver function. More than thirteen thousands plants have been studied for various pharmacological properties.[7] Hyperlipidemia is classified into a primary and a secondary type, which indicates the complexities associated with the disease. The primary disease may be treated by antilipidemic drugs but the secondary type originating from diabetes, renal lipid nephrosis, or hypothyroidism demands the treatment of the original disease rather than hyperlipidemia.[8] High-fat diet (HFD) may lead to the production of extra VLDL, resulting in the formation of large amounts of LDL, which may stick to the walls of the blood vessels if the quantity of HDL is insufficient, resulting in blockades for the normal flow of blood. Therefore improvement in human diet is highly recommended for disease prevention.[9]
Erythrina variegata Linn. var Orientalis (Linn.) Merrill (Family: Fabaceae) is a medium sized tree with smooth yellowish or grayish, shinning bark cultivated in many parts of India especially in Southern India often for ornamental purpose. The flowers are coral red and serve the ornamental purpose.[10] The whole plant including the seeds is used for a variety of illness in Indian system of medicine. The leaves were used to relieve pain and inflammation when crushed and applied to rheumatic joint. Fresh juice of the whole plant is used to cure long-standing dysmenorrhea and remove sterility in fatty women by gradually reducing abdominal fat and producing natural menstrual flow.[11] In Siddha system, the entire plant and seeds are used for the treatment of stomatitis, dysentery, sterility, diabetes, and eye disorders, and different parts of the plant are also used as sedative, antiepileptic, and as an antiseptic.[10] The entire plant including the seeds are reported to possess antihypertensive,[12] antimicrobial,[13] sedative,[14] immunosuppressive,[15] and anti-inflammatory properties.[16]
Phytochemical investigations on the plant revealed the presence of alkaloids,[10,17] flavanoids and isoflavanoids,[18–22] phenyl coumarins,[23] lectins,[24] flavones glycosides,[25] steroids, and fatty acids.[26] The seeds of E. variegata contain a pale yellow fixed oil which contains unsaturated fatty acid (oleic and linoleic acids) along with β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol in the seed coat,[27] a very useful phyto constituent with antilipidemic effects. Hence, the work was carried out to evaluate the hypolipidemic activity of methanolic extract of E. variegata seeds (MEEV) on rats fed with HFT.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Male Wistar rats weighing 200-250 g obtained from the animal house of C. L. Baid Metha College of Pharmacy were used in the study. The animals were maintained in well ventilated rooms with 12: 12 h light/dark cycle in polypropylene cages. All animals were acclimatized to the laboratory conditions one week prior to the initiation of the study. The study proposal was approved by Institutional animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) constituted under CPSCEA [Approval No: IAEC/XIII/02/CLBMCP-2009-2010 dated 22-03-09].
Plant material and extraction
The seeds of E. variegata were collected from the villages around Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The identity of the seeds was confirmed by Dr. Sasikala Ethirajulu, Ph. D, Research Officer, Central Research Institute of Siddha, Chennai, Govt. of India. A voucher specimen (CLMBCP-III- EV-17/08) was deposited in the department of Pharmacology, C. L. Baid Metha College of Pharmacy, Chennai. The seeds were further shade-dried for 72 h and powered with an electric grinder. The coarse powder was extracted with methanol and the residue was evaporated under reduced pressure in rotary vacuum evaporator at 60°C to obtain a dark brown colored molten mass. The percentage yield was found to be 12.7% w/w.
Chemicals and drugs
Standard kits used for the estimation of total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol were purchased from Keragen Technologies, Bangalore, India. Total protein kit was purchased from Sigma, USA. Other chemicals and solvents were purchased from s.d. Fine chemicals, Mumbai, India.
Acute toxicity studies
Wistar rats weighing 200–250 g (three nos) were used in the procedure. Acute oral toxicity was performed as OECD-423 guidelines.[28] The animals were fasted overnight, provided only water after which extract was administered to the animals orally at the dose level of 5 mg/kg body weight by gastric intubation and the animals were observed for 24 h. If mortality was observed in two or three animals, then the dose administered was assigned as a toxic dose. If mortality was observed in one animal, then the same dose was repeated again to confirm the toxic dose. If mortality was not observed, the procedure was repeated for further higher doses such as 50, 300 and 2000 mg/kg body weight. The animals were observed for toxic symptoms such as behavioral changes, locomotion, convulsions, and mortality for further 72 h.
Induction of hyperlipidemia
Preparation of HFT
Semisynthetic basal diet for the rats was prepared which contains (g/100 g) casein 30 g; agar 2 g; cellulose-8 g; sucrose-51 g; vitamin mixture-0.58 g and mineral mixture-0.50 g.[29] Hyperlipidemia was induced by addition of cholesterol-1.5 g and coconut oil 8 ml for every 100 g of basal diet.[30]
Experimental design
The animals were divided into five groups containing six animals each. Group I served as control; group II received HFD; group III received HFD and MEEV 200 mg/kg; group IV HFD and MEEV 400 mg/kg and group V received HFD and atorvastatin 1.2 mg/kg for 90 days.[31] Replenishing a known quantity of fresh food daily at 10.30 a.m. and thereby measuring the food intake of the previous day carried out measurement of daily food consumption. Body weight of rats was recorded weekly to assess percentage of weight gain in each group. General well-being and behavior of the animals were observed daily throughout the period of study. The litter in the cage was renewed twice a week to ensure maximum comfort for the animals. Animals were kept starved overnight on the 90th day. On the next day all the animals were sacrificed under light ether anesthesia. Blood was collected by carotid bleeding into sterilized dry centrifuge tubes and allowed to coagulate for 30 min at 37°C. The clear serum was separated at 2500 rpm for 10 min and was kept in frozen containers.
Estimation of cholesterol and lipids
The separated serum was subjected to biochemical estimation of parameters such as total cholesterol,[32] triglycerides,[33] and HDL-cholesterol.[32,34] LDL-cholesterol, VLDL-cholesterol, and the atherogenic index were calculated using standard equations.[35]
The percentage of lipid-lowering effect was calculated according to the following equation[36]:
Estimation of HMG-CoA reductase
The liver tissue was removed as quickly as possible and a 10% homogenate was prepared in saline arsenate solution. The homogenate was deproteinized using an equal volume of dilute perchloric acid and allowed to stand for 5 min followed by centrifugation; 0.5 ml of freshly prepared hydroxylamine reagent was added to 1 ml of the filterate. It was mixed and 1.5 ml of ferric chloride reagent was added after 5 min. The absorbance was read after 10 min at 540 nm against a similarly treated saline arsenate blank. The ratio of HMG-CoA/mevalonate was calculated.[37]
Determination fat pad weight
After exsanguination of animals, mesenteric fat pads were removed and weighed.[38]
Estimation of antioxidant enzymes
Hundred milligrams of liver tissue was weighed and homogenate was prepared in 10 ml Tris hydrochloric acid buffer (0.5 M; pH 7.4) at 4°C. The homogenate was centrifuged and the supernatant was used for the assay of antioxidant enzymes namely catalase,[39] superoxide dismutase,[40] and lipid peroxidation (LPO).[41]
Statistical analysis
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s t-test was applied to determine the statistical differences among experimental groups. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Results and Discussion
MEEV did not produce any toxic symptom or mortality up to the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight orally in mice, and hence the drugs were considered safer for further pharmacological screening. According to OECD-423 guidelines for acute oral toxicity, the LD 50 dose of 2000 mg/kg and above is categorized as unclassified.
There was a significant increase (P<0.001) in the level of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low–density, and very low density lipoprotein in the group II animals fed with HFT in comparison with the normal untreated control animals. Treatment with MEEV at 200 and 400 mg/kg produced a reduction of (24.15% and 32.32%) in total cholesterol; (14.43% and 19.24%) in triglycerides; (28.7% and 38.9%) in LDL in the respective doses with a statistical significance of (P<0.001) in comparison with group II animals. There was a moderate reduction in the VLDL in the group III animals (12.92%) and a significant reduction in the group IV animals (19.21%) in comparison with the group II animals. The reduction in the HDL produced by the group of animals fed with HFT was significant (P<0.001) in comparison with group I animals. However, the treatment with MEEV 200 and 400 mg/kg increased the HDL level by 17.73% and 20.13% in the respective groups but was nonsignificant statistically. The restoration of all the altered lipid parameters by the group V animals treated with atorvastatin 1.2 mg/kg was statistically significant (P<0.001) and comparable with normal animals. There was a significant (P<0.001) increase in the HMG-CoA reductase activity in the group II animals indicating increased cholesterol synthesis. The elevated enzyme activity was reduced significantly by treatment with MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg) dose dependently (P<0.01 and 0.001, respectively) and so by the standard drug atorvastatin 1.2 mg/kg. The atherogenic index (AI) of the animals fed on HFT was increased many fold in group II animals in comparison with normal group I animals (P<0.001), whereas treatment with MEEV reduced the index dose dependently with a statistical significance (P<0.001) in comparison with group II animals [Table 1].
Table 1.
Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TC (mg/dl) | 79.25±0.42 | 203.80±0.49a*** | 162.16±0.45b*** | 143.61±0.49b*** | 73.30±0.33b*** |
TG (mg/dl) | 58.9±0.74 | 135.1±0.37a*** | 115.6±0.42b*** | 109.1±0.51b*** | 55.3±0.19b*** |
HDL-c (mg/dl) | 29.32±0.63 | 15.00±0.41a*** | 16.16±0.80bNS | 16.82±0.28bNS | 17.02±0.21b*** |
LDL-c (mg/dl) | 73.34±0.48 | 179.78±0.97a*** | 142.48±0.48b*** | 125.19±0.41b*** | 65.64±0.63b*** |
VLDL-c (mg/dl) | 11.78±0.54 | 27.01±0.65a*** | 23.52±0.88b* | 21.82±1.02b*** | 11.06±1.03b*** |
Atherogenic index | 2.70±0.54 | 13.58±0.42a*** | 10.03±0.64b*** | 8.53±0.56b*** | 4.30±0.74b*** |
HMG-CoA/Mevalonate ratio | 11.24±0.83 | 3.31±0.12a*** | 5.86±0.34b** | 7.32±0.49b*** | 7.89±0.37b*** |
Body weight (g) | 249.67±4.12 | 327.57±5.89a*** | 284.24±4.43b*** | 269.16±2.72b*** | 233.84±3.44b*** |
Mesenteric fat pad weight (g) | 0.28±0.12 | 0.87±0.29a** | 0.40±0.03b* | 0.31±0.18b** | 0.17±0.08b*** |
Values are mean ± SEM, n=6 animals in each group. Comparisons were made between: a, group I vs. II and b, group II vs. III, IV, and V. Symbols represent statistical significance:
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001
The body weight of group II animals were increased significantly (P<0.001) in comparison with normal control group I animals. The increment in the weight was reduced significantly (P<0.001) by the administration of MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg) as well as atorvastatin 1.2 mg/kg in comparison with the HFD fed rats. The mean increase in the mesenteric fat pad was significant (P<0.01) in animals fed with HFD due to accumulation of cholesteryl esters. Treatment with MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg) reduced the elevated fat pad weight significantly (P<0.05 and <0.01, respectively). However, treatment group receiving atorvastatin 1.2 m/kg produced maximum reduction in fat pad weight (P<0.001) [Table 1].
The levels of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT were reduced significantly (P<0.001) in animals treated with HFD. The administration of MEEV at doses 200 and 400 mg/kg significantly restored the reduced enzymic activity (P<0.001). Feeding with HFD produced an increased LPO in the group II animals (P<0.001), which was significantly reduced by the treatment with MEEV (200 and 400 mg/kg) in group III and IV animals, respectively [Table 2].
Table 2.
Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOD (Units/mg of protein) | 6.90±0.10 | 3.13±0.12a*** | 4.36±0.16b** | 4.69±0.12b*** | 5.65±0.17b*** |
CAT (n moles of H2O2 decomposed/mg of protein) | 44.60±1.32 | 22.24±1.25a*** | 31.18±1.47b*** | 36.75±1.31b*** | 39.28±1.33b*** |
LPO (n moles of TBRAS/mg of protein) | 2.72±0.04 | 4.40±0.05a*** | 3.80±0.06b*** | 3.20±0.06b*** | 2.90±0.06b*** |
Values are mean ± SEM, n=6 animals in each group. Comparisons were made between: a, group I vs. II and b, group II vs. III, IV, and V. Symbols represent statistical significance:
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001
It is well known that increased HDL-cholesterol levels have a protective role in coronary artery disease.[42] Similarly increased level of serum LDL-cholesterol results in increased risk for the development of atherosclerosis.[43] The increased level of HDL-cholesterol and decreased cholesterol along with its LDL fraction, which is evident from the results, could be due to increased cholesterol absorption through gastrointestinal tract. Thus the decreasing cholesterol levels in the body under the influence of E. variegata could have been due to rapid catabolism of LDL-cholesterol through its hepatic receptors for final elimination in the form of bile acids.[44]
As to the data of HDL, there was a significant increase in the serum HDL level in the rats treated with MEEV and also play a key role in the protection against oxidative damage of membrane.[45,46] Therefore, the atherogenic index (ratio of TC to HDL) is an important prognostic marker for cardiovascular disease.[47–49] Lower ratio of TC to HDL is usually associated with a low HDL and/or elevated TC.
The presence of β-sitosterol has also been reported to be a useful phytoconstituent in the treatment of hyperlipidemia.[50] The seed coat of E. variegata has already been reported to contain β-sitosterol along with stigmasterol and campesterol. β-Sitosterol is a plant sterol, a compound similar to cholesterol. It is not absorbed much from the digestive system to the rest of the body, so it works mostly within the digestive system. It works by blocking the absorption of cholesterol from the intestine. Because β-sitosterol decreases the absorption of cholesterol in the intestine, it can decrease cholesterol levels in the body. Stigmasterol and campesterol have effects similar to β-sitosterol, but campesterol produces only a modest lipid-lowering effect on par with β-sitosterol.[51]
The increased HMG CoA/Mevalonate ratio noted in the extract-treated group in comparison with HFD-treated group could be due to an increased cholesterol excretion and/or decreased cholesterol absorption. The HMG-CoA/mevalonate has an inverse relationship to the activity of HMG-CoA reductase. HMG-CoA reductase catalyzes an early, rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statin group of drugs) like atorvastatin, simvastain, and rosuvastatin reduces raised triglyceride levels caused by elevated VLDL levels. By reducing the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, the statins inhibit hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis.[52] The results of our study indicate a similar kind of reduction in LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides as like the group treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/kg. Statins reduce the LDL-cholesterol levels by enhancing the removal of its precursors (such as VLDL and IDL) and also by decreasing hepatic VLDL production.[52] In addition, the statins tend to increase the synthesis of LDL-receptors and their degradation may be reduced upon its administration. This mechanism likely account for the triglyceride lowering effect of statins and a similar effect is noticed in E. variegata seed extract treated groups and may be the likely mechanism of action for reduced LDL and triglyceride level.
Hypercholesterolemia along with high-cholesterol diet and oxidative stress increases serum LDL levels resulting in increased risk for the development of atherosclerosis.[43] Endothelial cells bind LDL and when activated by injury, these cells are attached to monocytes/macrophages and generate free radicals, which oxidize LDL, resulting in LPO and destruction of the receptor needed for the normal receptor-mediated clearance of LDL.[53] Atorvastatin is well known to prevent LPO and increases the LDL receptor expression.[52] In addition, atorvastatin has additional antioxidant property.[54] From the results, it becomes evident that treatment with MEEV also reduced the LPO in a dose-dependent manner, which may be through the mechanism similar to that of statin.
The antioxidant enzymes mainly SOD and CAT are known to control oxidative damage.[55] Catalase is a common enzyme whose functions include catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to H2O and O2. Catalase has the highest turnover rates of all enzymes; one molecule can convert millions of molecules of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen per second. Similarly Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is an enzyme that removes the superoxide (O2-) radical, repair cells, and reduces the damage done to them by superoxide.[56] The present study indicates that the animal groups treated with E. variegata seed extract had higher levels of antioxidative enzymes (CAT and SOD) and decreased level of LPO indicating its efficacy to reduce the LDL-cholesterol oxidation and atherogenesis. Phytoconstituents such as flavonoids and poly phenols are natural antioxidants that may reduce oxidative process and increase SOD, CAT activities.[57,58] The similar phytoconstituents are reported in E. variegate, which adds on to their efficacy in increased SOD, CAT activities significantly.[18,19] It was reported that these compounds act mainly as promoters for SOD, CAT.[59] The currently noted elevated levels of both CAT and SOD with MEEV treatment could be due to the presence and influence of flavonoids.[55] Reduced level of SOD and CAT observed in HFD-treated group, therefore, causes a number of deleterious effects to cells and tissues due to the accumulation of potent superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide.
Administration of HFD produced a highly significant increase in weight mesenteric fat pads. A reduction in the raised weight in the fat pads as observed in the groups of animals treated with MEEV may be attributed to increased thermogenesis and decreased lipogenesis.[38]
Furthermore, there was also an increase in cholesterol content of the fecal matter indicating that E. variegata promoted the excretion of cholesterol (data not shown). Bioactive fractions of plant origin are often known to reduce dyslipidemia by this mechanism too.[60]
In conclusion, from the observation, the protective effect of the seeds of E. variegata on high fat induced hyperlipidemia may be attributed to a decrease in cholesterol synthesis, an increase in cholesterol excretion and expression of LDL receptor and subsequent catabolism. The antioxidant effect afforded may be playing a promising role in retarding/preventing associated cardiovascular complications secondary to hyperlipidemia. Studies on the isolated fractions and constituents are needed to elucidate mechanisms by which E. variegata exert protective effects on hyperlipidemia.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared
References
- 1.Grundy SM. Cholesterol and coronary heart disease: A new era. J Am Med Assoc. 1986;256:2849–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davey Smith G. Cholesterol lowering and mortality; the importance of considering initial level of risk. Int Med J. 1993;306:1367–73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saravanan R, Rajendra Prasad N, Pugalandi KV. Effect of Piper bettle leaf extract on alcoholic toxicity in the rat brain. J Med Food. 2003;6:261–5. doi: 10.1089/10966200360716689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaesancini AY, Krauss RM. Cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidemia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1994;5:249–51. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199408000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davey Smith G, Pekkanen J. Should there be a moratorium on the use of cholesterol lowering drugs? Br Med J. 1992;304:431–40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6824.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brown SL. Lowered serum cholesterol and low mood. Br Med J. 1996;313:637–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berliner JA, Heinecke JW. The role of oxidized lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20:707–27. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02173-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suzuki T, Suzuki Y. Current topics of lipid dynamics and pathobiology in membrane lipid rafts. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29:1538–41. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ryan DH. Diet and exercise in the prevention of diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2003;134:25–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khare CP. Indian Medicinal Plants. 1st ed. New Delhi: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 245. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nadkarni KM, Nadkarni AK, Chopra RN. Indian Materia Medica. Bombay: Popular Prakashan; 1991. pp. 508–9. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chatterjee GK, Burman TK, Nag Chaudhury AK. Preliminary pharmacological screening of Erythrina variegata var Orientalis seed. Indian J Pharmacol. 1981;13:153–8. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhale R, Bokadia J. In vitro antimicrobial activity of fixed oil of Erythrina indica. Indian Drugs. 1979;14:39–40. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG. Aqueous extract of Srilankan Erythrina indica leaves has sedative but not analgesic activity. Fitoterapia. 1999;70:311–3. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh LM, Chatterjee S. Effect of Amoora rohituka on in vitro blastogenesis of lymphocytes. J Res Ind Med Yoga and Homeopathy. 1979;14:44–8. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thenmozhi V, Elango V, Sadique J. Anti-inflammatory activity of some Indian Medicinal Plants. Ancient Sci Life. 1989;8:258–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chawla K, Shama S. Erythritol. A new isoquinoline alkaloid from Erythrina variegata flowers. Fitoterapia. 1993;64(1):15–17. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tanaka H, Hirat M, Etoh H. Six new constituents from the roots of Erythrina variegata. Chemistry and Biodiversity. 2004;1(7):1101–08. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200490082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sato M, Tanaka H, Yamaguchi R. Synergistic effects of mupirocin and an isoflavone isolated from Erythrina variegata on growth and recovery of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:241–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Waffo AK, Azebaze GA, Nkenfack AK. Indicanines B and C, two isoflavanoid derivatives from the root bark of Erythrina indica. Phytochemistry. 2000;53:981–5. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(99)00615-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hedge VR, Dai P, Patel MG. Phospholipase A2 inhibitors from an Erythrina species from Samoa. J Nat Prod. 1997;60:1537–9. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kouzuma Y, Yamasaki N, Kimura M. The tissue type plaminogen activator inhibitor ETIa from Erythrina variegata: Structural basis for the inhibitory activity by cloning expression and mutagenesis of the cDNA encoding ETIa. J Biochem. 1997;121:456–63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nkengfack AE, Waffo AK, Azebaze GA. Indicanine A, a new 3-phenyl coumarin from root bark of Erythrina indica. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:855–6. doi: 10.1021/np990300y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bhattacharyya L, Ghosh A, Sen A. A comparative study on lectins from four Erythrina species. Phytochemistry. 1986;25:2117–22. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yadava RN, Reddy KI. A novel prenylated flavones glycoside from the seeds of Erythrina variegata. Fitoterapia. 1999;70:357–60. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharma S, Chawla K. Steroids and fatty acids from Erythrina variegata flowers. Fitoterapia. 1993;64:88. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mehrotra R. Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1991. p. 177. [Google Scholar]
- 28.OECD/OCDE, OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, revised draft guidelines 423: Acute oral toxicity, acute toxic class method, revised document, CPCSEA, Ministry of social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India. 2000 [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barney GH, Orgebin-Crist MC, Macapinalac MP. Genesis of esophageal parakeratosis and histologic changes in the testes of the zinc-deficient rat and their reversal by zinc repletion. J Nutr. 1968;95:526–34. doi: 10.1093/jn/95.4.526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mukundh NB, Muralidharan P, Balamurugan G. Antihyperlipidemic activity of Pedalium murex (Linn) fruits on high fat diet fed rats. Int J Pharmacol. 2008;4:310–3. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kottai Muthu A, Sethupathy S, Manavalan R. Hypolipidemic effect of methanolic extract of Dolichos biflorus Linn. In high fat diet fed rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2005;43:522–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wybenga DR, Pileggi VJ, Dristine PH. Direct manual determination of serum cholesterol with single stable reagent. Clin Chem. 1983;16:980–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McGowan MW, Artiss JD, Strandbergh DR, Zak B. A peroxidase-coupled method for the colorimetric determination of serum triglycerides. Clin Chem. 1983;29:538–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Burstein M, Scholnic HR, Morfin R. Rapid method for the isolation of lipoproteins from human serum by precipitation with poly anion. J Lipid Res. 1970;11:583–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of LDL cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Puri A, Khaliq T, Rajendran SM, Bhatia G, Chandra R, Narender T. Antidyslipidemic activity of Indigofera tinctoria. J Herb Pharmacother. 2007;7:59–64. doi: 10.1300/j157v07n01_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rao AV, Ramakrishnan S. Indirect assessment of hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductsae (NADPH) activity in liver tissue. Clin Chem. 1975;21:1523–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kaur G, Kulkarni SK. Antiobesity effect of a polyherbal formulation, OB-200G in female rats fed on cafeteria and atherogenic diets. Indian J Pharmacol. 2000;32:294–9. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Takahara S, Hamilton HB, Neel JV, Kobara TY, Ogura Y, Nishimura ET. Hypocatalasemia: A new genetic carrier state. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:610–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI104075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the auto-oxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47:469–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Luck H. Methods of Enzymatic analysis. New Delhi: Academic Press; 1965. pp. 895–7. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Castelli WP. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality. The Framingham heart study. Atherosclerosis. 1988;8:737–40. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.8.6.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Warnholtz A, Mollnau H, Oleze M. Antioxidants and endothelial dysfunction in hyperlipidemia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001;3:53–60. doi: 10.1007/s11906-001-0081-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khanna AK, Rizvi F, Chander R. Lipid lowering activity of Phyllanthus niruri in hyperlipidemic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;82:19–22. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nofer JR, Kehrel B, Fobker M. HDL and atherosclerosis: Beyond reverse cholesterol transport. Atherosclerosis. 2002;161:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(01)00651-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cheng JW. Rosuvastatin in the management of hyperlipidemia. Clin Ther. 2004;26:1368–87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boers M, Nurmohamed MT, Doelman CJ, Lard LR, Verhoevan AC, Voskuyl AE. Influence of glucocorticoid and disease activity on total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:842–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Situnayake R, Kitas G. Dyslipidemia and rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:341–2. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.6.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Parthasarathy S, Barneth J, Fong LG. High density lipoprotein inhibits the oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1990;1044:275–83. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(90)90314-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bopanna KN, Bhagyalakshmi N, Rathod SP. Cell culture derived Hemidesmus indicus in the prevention of hypercholesterolemia in normal and hyperlipidemic rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 1997;29:105. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Field FJ, Born E, Mathur SN. Effect of micellar beta-sitosterol on cholesterol metabolism in CaCo2 cells. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:348–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilmann AG. Goodman and Gilmann’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 10th ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2007. Drug therapy for hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia; pp. 971–95. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. Pharmacology. 4th ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. Lipid lowering drugs; pp. 305–9. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. New Delhi: Jaypee Bros Publication; 2004. Hypolipidemic drugs and plasma expanders; pp. 575–86. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Parthasarathy S, Santanam N, Ramachandran S. Oxidant and antioxidants in atherogenesis: An appraisal. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:2143–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chakraborty P, Sureshkumar, Dutta D, Gupta V. Role of antioxidants in common health diseases. Research J Pharm Tech. 2009;2:238–44. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sudeesh S, Vijayalakshmi NR. Flavanoids from Punic granatum, potential antiperoxidative agents. Fitoterapia. 2005;76:181–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Badami S, Gupta MK, Suresh B. Antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extract of Striga orobanchioides. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;85:227–30. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Toyokuni S, Tanaka T, Kawaguchi W. Effects of phenolic contents of Mauritian endemic plant extracts on promoter activities of antioxidant enzymes. Free Radic Res. 2003;37:1215–24. doi: 10.1080/10715760310001598150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.D’Souza T, Mengi SA, Hassarajani S. Efficacy study of bioactive fraction (F-3) of Acorus calamus in hyperlipidemia. Indian J Pharmacol. 2007;39:196–200. [Google Scholar]