Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1987 Dec;84(23):8740–8744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.23.8740

Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex.

R C Reid 1, R E Soodak 1, R M Shapley 1
PMCID: PMC299622  PMID: 3479811

Abstract

The role of linear spatial summation in the directional selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex was investigated. The experimental paradigm consisted of comparing the response to drifting grating stimuli with linear predictions based on the response to stationary contrast-reversing gratings. The spatial phase dependence of the response to contrast-reversing gratings was consistent with a high degree of linearity of spatial summation within the receptive fields. Furthermore, the preferred direction predicted from the response to stationary gratings generally agreed with the measurements made with drifting gratings. The amount of directional selectivity predicted was, on average, about half the measured value, indicating that nonlinear mechanisms act in concert with linear mechanisms in determining the overall directional selectivity.

Full text

PDF
8740

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B., HILL R. M., LEVICK W. R. RETINAL GANGLION CELLS RESPONDING SELECTIVELY TO DIRECTION AND SPEED OF IMAGE MOTION IN THE RABBIT. J Physiol. 1964 Oct;173:377–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop P. O., Coombs J. S., Henry G. H. Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(3):625–657. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R. Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat's retina and an overall classification. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):457–492. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dean A. F., Tolhurst D. J. Factors influencing the temporal phase of response to bar and grating stimuli for simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(1):143–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00237410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duysens J., Orban G. A. Is stimulus movement of particular importance in the functioning of cat visual cortex? Brain Res. 1981 Sep 7;220(1):184–187. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emerson R. C., Coleman L. Does image movement have a special nature for neurons in the cat's striate cortex? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Jun;20(6):766–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Emerson R. C., Gerstein G. L. Simple striate neurons in the cat. II. Mechanisms underlying directional asymmetry and directional selectivity. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Jan;40(1):136–155. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.1.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferster D. Origin of orientation-selective EPSPs in simple cells of cat visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1987 Jun;7(6):1780–1791. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-06-01780.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin A. W., Henry G. H., Bishop P. O. Direction selectivity of simple striate cells: properties and mechanism. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1500–1523. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.6.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hochstein S., Shapley R. M. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):265–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubel D. H. Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units. Science. 1957 Mar 22;125(3247):549–550. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3247.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:53–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Soodak R. E. The retinal ganglion cell mosaic defines orientation columns in striate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(11):3936–3940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.11.3936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Soodak R. E. Two-dimensional modeling of visual receptive fields using Gaussian subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):9259–9263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.9259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamane S., Maske R., Bishop P. O. Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. II. Relation to moving dark bar responses. Exp Brain Res. 1985;57(3):523–536. doi: 10.1007/BF00237839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES