The C-terminal fragment of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus) major (backbone) pilin GBS80 was purified and crystallized in two different space groups. Single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data collected to 2.0 Å resolution on a iodide (NaI) derivative crystal using the home source were used to obtain initial phases.
Keywords: pilins, GBS80, Streptococcus agalactiae
Abstract
The Gram-positive pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae or group B streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial septicemia, pneumonia and meningitis among neonates around the world. The pathogen assembles two types of pili on its surface, named PI-1 and PI-2, that mediate bacterial adherence to host cells. The GBS PI-1 pilus is formed by the major pilin GBS80, which forms the pilus shaft, and two minor pilins GBS104 and GBS52, which are incorporated into the pilus structure. While considerable structural information exists on Gram-negative pili, the structural study of Gram-positive pili is an emerging area of research. Here, the purification, crystallization and initial phasing of the 35 kDa major fragment of the backbone pilin GBS80 are reported. Crystals were obtained in two different space groups: P21 and C2. SAD data collected from an iodide-derivative crystal at the home source were used to obtain initial phases and interpretable electron-density maps.
1. Introduction
Many Gram-positive bacterial pathogens use their cell-wall-anchored pili to initiate adherence to the host cells, which is the key initial step in bacterial colonization. A typical pilus is made up of two or three distinct individual pilins, multiple copies of which assemble to form hair-like appendages on the bacterial cell walls (Mandlik et al., 2008 ▶). Gram-negative pilus assembly is well understood (Proft & Baker, 2009 ▶); however, the same is not true for Gram-positive bacteria, for which the mechanism of pilus assembly is a relatively recent discovery (Ton-That & Schneewind, 2004 ▶; Lauer et al., 2005 ▶; Rosini et al., 2006 ▶; Dramsi et al., 2006 ▶). It has been suggested, mainly from the well studied Corynebacterium diphtheriae pilus model (Ton-That & Schneewind, 2004 ▶), that the pili are assembled through covalent linkage of individual protein subunits (pilins); this is in contrast to Gram-negative pili, in which they are held together by noncovalent interactions (for a recent review, see Kline et al., 2010 ▶). A cysteine transpeptidase called sortase, which is conserved across all Gram-positive bacteria, is implicated in such covalent linkages between the pilin subunits.
Streptococcus agalactiae or group B streptococcus (GBS) causes pneumonia, septicemia and meningitis in neonates and is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the United States and Europe (Baker & Edwards, 2001 ▶). Genomic analysis of GBS strains (2603V/R, NEM316 and A909) shows the presence of two similar pilus islands (PIs; Rosini et al., 2006 ▶; Dramsi et al., 2006 ▶). The GBS PI-1 pilus (strain 2603V/R) is built from three pilins GBS80, GBS52 and GBS104. The major pilin GBS80 forms the pilus shaft, while the two minor pilins GBS104 and GBS52 are incorporated into the pilus structure.
The GBS pili are considered to be important targets for vaccine development, since they are important virulence factors for several diseases and take part in multiple functions, including host-cell adhesion (Soriani & Telford, 2010 ▶). In addition to facilitating vaccine design, we initiated structural studies on the individual pilin components of GBS in order to understand pilus assembly in Gram-positive bacteria. We have previously reported the structure of the GBS minor pilin GBS52 (Krishnan et al., 2007 ▶), which was the first pilin structure to be determined from a Gram-positive bacterium. Recently, several further pilin structures from other Gram-positive organisms have also been reported (Budzik et al., 2009 ▶; Kang et al., 2007 ▶, 2009 ▶; Izoré et al., 2010 ▶; Spraggon et al., 2010 ▶; Linke et al., 2010 ▶). Here, we describe the expression, purification, crystallization and initial phasing procedure that we used for the structure determination of a 35 kDa C-terminal fragment of GBS80, which exhibits poor sequence homology (<18%) to the other backbone pilins Spy0128 from S. pyogenes (Kang et al., 2007 ▶), SpaA from C. diphtheriae (Kang et al., 2009 ▶), BcpA from Bacillus cereus (Budzik et al., 2009 ▶) and RrgB from S. pneumoniae (Spraggon et al., 2010 ▶).
2. Methods, results and discussion
2.1. Cloning, expression and purification
S. agalactiae 2603V/R was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The primers 5′-AAAGGATCCAGAGCTGCAGAAGTGTCACA-3′ and 5′-AAAGGATCCTTAACGTTTGTTGTTTTTAATTGTATC-3′ were used to PCR-amplify the sequence of GBS gbs80 (coding for Arg36–Arg518) from chromosomal DNA of GBS strain 2603V/R (locus tag SAG0645). The DNA fragment was cloned into pQE30 according to a published protocol (Mandlik et al., 2007 ▶). After verification by DNA sequencing, the resulting plasmid pHTT110 was transformed into Escherichia coli XL1-Blue.
GBS GBS8036–518 with an N-terminal His tag (MRGSHHHHHHGS) was expressed and purified as follows. Overnight cultures (20 ml) of stationary-phase E. coli were used to inoculate 1 l Luria–Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin. The cells were allowed to grow at 310 K until the culture reached an OD600nm of ∼0.6. Protein expression was induced by the addition of isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.2 mM and the culture was incubated overnight at 303 K. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer [50 mM phosphate pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 5 mM imidazole] containing EDTA-free protease-inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche). The cells were lysed by passage three times through a French press (76 MPa). Insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation at 48 384g for 20 min at 277 K and the supernatant was applied onto a 10 ml NiCl2-charged HiTrap chelating column (two 5 ml columns were connected serially). The columns were connected to an FPLC system (Pharmacia) and washed with ten bed volumes of buffer A [50 mM phosphate pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM imidazole]. The bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–300 mM imidazole to elution buffer B (300 mM imidazole in buffer A). Fractions containing the desired protein, as determined by SDS–PAGE, were pooled and dialyzed against 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA. The dialyzed protein was concentrated using an Amicon ultrafiltration system and applied onto an S-200 (26/60) Sephacryl gel-filtration column in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 40 mM l-Arg, 40 mM l-Glu, 2 mM EDTA. After desalting in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, the protein was further purified on a HiTrap Q column with elution buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl. The purified GBS80 was concentrated to 15–60 mg ml−1, but crystallization trials were unsuccessful. Partial degradation of the purified protein was noticed after storage. The inclusion of protease inhibitors did not stop the degradation completely. Therefore, limited proteolysis by trypsin was attempted in order to obtain a stable fragment, but yielded several nonspecific smaller fragments. However, proteolysis by α-chymotrypsin after optimization (overnight digestion at a 1:100 ratio at room temperature in digestion buffer consisting of 30 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl) yielded a stable 35 kDa fragment. The inhibitor PMSF was added to the digested GBS80 to a concentration of 0.5 mM and it was then subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using an S-200 (16/60) column in crystallization buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl). N-terminal sequencing suggested that the cleavage occurred at the pilin motif (YPKN) between Lys199 and Asn200. Molecular-weight calculation from the sequence (Asn200–Arg518) and SDS–PAGE confirmed that there was no C-terminal cleavage. Moreover, the initial electron-density map calculated from the iodide SAD phasing as described below clearly shows the presence of the Cα trace for the C-terminal residues of GBS80.
2.2. Crystallization
The purified GBS80 35 kDa fragment was concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl and subjected to crystallization by the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method with the help of a Crystal Phoenix robot (Art Robbins Instruments) as well as manually by the hanging-drop crystallization method using various commercial crystal screens. Plate-like diffraction-quality crystals appeared after three weeks in four conditions. Large crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained in an optimized condition consisting of 2 µl protein solution in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl mixed with 2 µl reservoir solution and equilibrated against a 1.0 ml reservoir of 0.1 M MES pH 5.5, 25%(w/v) PEG MME 2000 at 295 K (Fig. 1 ▶). Another batch of GBS80 purified using a similar protocol and treated with 10 mM CaCl2 as an additive also degraded to a 35 kDa fragment. Crystals of the CaCl2-treated GBS80 fragment were obtained using the same conditions [0.1 M MES pH 5.5, 25%(w/v) PEG MME 2000] but belonged to a different space group (see below).
Figure 1.
Example of native crystals (0.5 × 0.3 × 0.1 mm in size) of the 35 kDa fragment of GBS80 (chymotrypsin-digested) obtained in 25%(w/v) PEG MME 2000, 0.1 M MES pH 5.5 after 21 d at 295 K.
2.3. Data collection
Native diffraction data were collected to 1.8 Å resolution (Fig. 2 ▶ a) on an R-AXIS IV imaging-plate detector mounted on an in-house Rigaku rotating-anode X-ray generator operating at 100 mA and 50 kV. Diffraction data were collected using one crystal over a range of 190° with 1° steps, using 20%(v/v) ethylene glycol (EG) as a cryoprotectant. The data were processed with d*TREK (Pflugrath, 1999 ▶) and crystallographic data statistics are presented in Table 1 ▶. Diffraction data from CaCl2-treated GBS80 crystals were also collected in-house (Table 1 ▶) using 20%(v/v) EG as a cryoprotectant (Fig. 2 ▶ b).
Figure 2.
(a) X-ray diffraction image from crystals of the chymotrypsin-digested native 35 kDa fragment of GBS80 collected on an R-AXIS IV imaging-plate detector mounted on an in-house Rigaku rotating-anode X-ray generator operated at 100 mA and 50 kV. (b) X-ray diffraction image from crystals of the CaCl2-treated 35 kDa fragment of GBS80.
Table 1. Data-collection and processing statistics.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| Native (chymotrypsin-treated) | Native (CaCl2-treated) | Derivative (NaI-soaked) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of crystals | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Beamline | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.5418 | 1.5418 | 1.5418 |
| Detector | R-AXIS IV image plate | R-AXIS IV image plate | R-AXIS IV image plate |
| Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) | 100 | 105 | 150 |
| Rotation range per image (°) | 1 | 0.75 | 1 |
| Total rotation range (°) | 190 | 296 | 360 |
| Exposure time per image (s) | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 40–1.7 (1.76–1.70) | 40–1.7 (1.76–1.70) | 40–2.0 (2.07–2.00) |
| Space group | P21 | C2 | P21 |
| Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) | a = 69.9, b = 60.3, c = 80.4, β = 101.6 | a = 130.5, b = 34.7, c = 74.6, β = 93.3 | a = 34.9, b = 59.7, c = 80.8, β = 101.6 |
| Mosaicity (°) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Total No. of measured intensities | 200661 | 158279 | 138772 |
| Unique reflections | 71940 | 37173 | 21409 |
| Multiplicity | 2.8 (2.7) | 4.3 (4.1) | 6.5 (5.9) |
| Mean I/σ(I) | 8.3 (2.5) | 26.7 (6.5) | 18.9 (9.0) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.7 (100) | 99.8 (100) | 96.7 (87.1) |
| χ2 | 0.97 (1.16) | 0.97 (1.10) | 0.95 (1.03) |
| Rmerge (%)† | 6.8 (37.2) | 2.8 (17.1) | 5.6 (15.2) |
| Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) | 19.3 | 19.8 | 23.2 |
| No. of molecules in the asymmetric unit | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Ranom (%)‡ | — | — | 3.2 (5.3) |
| Phasing (for all data) | |||
| Phasing power§ | — | — | 1.3 |
| RCullis§ | — | — | 0.75 |
| Figure of merit | — | — | 0.33 |
R
merge =
, where the Ii(hkl) are the intensities of symmetry-related reflections and 〈I(hkl)〉 is the average intensity over all observations.
R
anom =
, where I
+(h) and I
−(h) are the Bijvoet pairs of I(h).
From autoSHARP for acentric reflections.
The native GBS80 crystals belonged to the monoclinic space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 69.9, b = 60.3, c = 80.4 Å, β = 101.6°. The V M calculation (calculated V M of 2.4 Å3 Da−1 and solvent content of 48%) suggested the presence of two molecules in the asymmetric unit. Analysis of the diffraction data using SFCHECK (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994 ▶) suggested the presence of pseudo-translational symmetry (x + 1/2, y, z). The CaCl2-treated GBS80 fragment crystals belonged to the monoclinic space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 130.3, b = 34.6, c = 74.6 Å, β = 93.3°. The V M calculation (V M of 2.4 Å3 Da−1 and solvent content of 49%) suggested the presence of one molecule in the asymmetric unit.
2.4. Heavy-atom derivatives and initial phasing
The halide quick-soaking method proposed by Dauter et al. (2000 ▶) was used for phasing, since molecular replacement and a search for traditional heavy-atom derivatives were not successful. The crystallized fragment of GBS80 contains only one Met residue, therefore we did not attempt to produce its recombinant SeMet derivative. The theoretical pI of the crystallized fragment is 5.3 and the 35 kDa fragment of GBS80 contains four Arg and 41 Lys (14%) residues. Anticipating the potential for binding halide anions, we initiated attempts to introduce them by screening various halide anions and alkali-metal cations such as KI, NaI and CsCl; the iodide derivative obtained using NaI showed significant anomalous signal.
The iodine derivatives were prepared either by directly soaking crystals of the 35 kDa fragment of GBS80 in reservoir solution with NaI added or in cryoprotectant solution containing 200 mM NaI for a short time of between 1 and 2 min. During the soaking, no visible cracking of the crystals was observed. Diffraction data for the iodide derivatives were collected at a wavelength of 1.5418 Å at the home source data-collection facility (Table 1 ▶) and the data were processed with d*TREK (Pflugrath, 1999 ▶). The unit-cell volume of the iodide-derivative crystals was half of that of the native crystal in space group P21 (Table 1 ▶), with one molecule in the asymmetric unit, and the crystal had no pseudo-translational symmetry. However, the change in unit-cell parameters was not a consequence of the iodide soaking, as a few native crystals were also found that diffracted to <2 Å resolution with smaller unit-cell parameters. The anomalous signal of the iodide derivative was evaluated using the autoSHARP software (Vonrhein et al., 2007 ▶); three iodide sites were identified in the initial anomalous difference Patterson maps (Fig. 3 ▶) and seven additional sites were identified in the second round of residual map interpretation. Model building with the help of Coot and REFMAC from the CCP4 suite (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994 ▶) is in progress and will be presented elsewhere.
Figure 3.
The (u, 1/2, w) Harker section of the anomalous difference Patterson map (F + − F −) calculated and plotted using the FFT and NPO programs from CCP4 linked to autoSHARP with data between 20 and 5 Å resolution. The contour levels are at 0.4 r.m.s. intervals, starting at 1.5 r.m.s. above the mean density. The arrows show the three iodide sites with high occupancies identified in the initial search using autoSHARP.
3. Conclusions
The GBS80 fragment was purified and crystallized in two conditions. Molecular replacement and a conventional heavy-atom derivative search for initial phasing were not successful. The high content of Lys and Arg residues in the GBS80 fragment prompted us to try halide soaking (Dauter et al., 2000 ▶). It has been reported that halide anions bind tightly (Dauter et al., 2000 ▶) as indicated by their high anomalous difference peaks, good occupancies and low B factors. Of the halides tried, NaI soaking yielded good phasing information, while soaking in KI and CsCl resulted in crystal cracking. The use of a home source X-ray facility and simple halide quick-soaking combined with automatic structure-determination software is a powerful method that is worth trying as an alternative to a conventional MIR search for heavy-atom derivatives.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants to HT-T (AI061381) and SVLN (AI073521).
References
- Baker, C. J. & Edwards, M. S. (2001). Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant, edited by J. S. Remington & J. O. Klein, pp. 1091–1156. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
- Budzik, J. M., Poor, C. B., Faull, K. F., Whitelegge, J. P., He, C. & Schneewind, O. (2009). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 19992–19997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763.
- Dauter, Z., Dauter, M. & Rajashankar, K. R. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 232–237. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Dramsi, S., Caliot, E., Bonne, I., Guadagnini, S., Prevost, M. C., Kojadinovic, M., Lalioui, L., Poyart, C. & Trieu-Cuot, P. (2006). Mol. Microbiol.60, 1401–1413. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Izoré, T., Contreras-Martel, C., El Mortaji, L., Manzano, C., Terrasse, R., Vernet, T., Di Guilmi, A. M. & Dessen, A. (2010). Structure, 18, 106–115. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kang, H. J., Coulibaly, F., Clow, F., Proft, T. & Baker, E. N. (2007). Science, 318, 1625–1628. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kang, H. J., Paterson, N. G., Gaspar, A. H., Ton-That, H. & Baker, E. N. (2009). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 16967–16971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kline, K. A., Dodson, K. W., Caparon, M. G. & Hultgren, S. J. (2010). Trends Microbiol.18, 224–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Krishnan, V., Gaspar, A. H., Ye, N., Mandlik, A., Ton-That, H. & Narayana, S. V. (2007). Structure, 15, 893–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lauer, P., Rinaudo, C. D., Soriani, M., Margarit, D., Maione, D., Rosini, R., Taddei, A., Mora, M., Rappuoli, R., Grandi, G. & Telford, J. L. (2005). Science, 309, 105. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Linke, C., Young, P. G., Kang, H. J., Bunker, R. D., Middleditch, M. J., Caradoc-Davies, T. T., Proft, T. & Baker, E. N. (2010). J. Biol. Chem.285, 20381–20389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Mandlik, A., Swierczynski, A., Das, A. & Ton-That, H. (2007). Mol. Microbiol.64, 111–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Mandlik, A., Swierczynski, A., Das, A. & Ton-That, H. (2008). Trends Microbiol.16, 33–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Pflugrath, J. W. (1999). Acta Cryst. D55, 1718–1725. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Proft, T. & Baker, E. N. (2009). Cell. Mol. Life Sci.66, 613–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Rosini, R., Rinaudo, C. D., Soriani, M., Lauer, P., Mora, M., Maione, D., Taddei, A., Santi, I., Ghezzo, C., Brettoni, C., Buccato, S., Margarit, I., Grandi, G. & Telford, J. L. (2006). Mol. Microbiol.61, 126–141. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Soriani, M. & Telford, J. L. (2010). Future Microbiol.5, 735–747. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Spraggon, G., Koesema, E., Scarselli, M., Malito, E., Biagini, M., Norais, N., Emolo, C., Barocchi, M. A., Giusti, F., Hilleringmann, M., Rappuoli, R., Lesley, S., Covacci, A., Masignani, V. & Ferlenghi, V. (2010). PLoS ONE, 5, e10919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ton-That, H. & Schneewind, O. (2004). Trends Microbiol.12, 228–234. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Vonrhein, C., Blanc, E., Roversi, P. & Bricogne, G. (2007). Methods Mol. Biol.364, 215–230. [DOI] [PubMed]



