Table 3.
Country | Survey Datea | Sample Size | Sibling Effectb |
Birth-Order Effectc |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | t Statistic | Effect | t Statistic | |||
Asia | ||||||
Bangladesh | 1999–2000 | 10,544 | 0.07 | 2.62 | 0.04 | 2.36 |
India | 1998–1999 | 90,303 | 0.13 | 14.93 | 0.03 | 4.92 |
Indonesia | 2002–2003 | 29,483 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2.81 |
Nepal | 2001 | 8,726 | 0.18 | 6.57 | 0.03 | 1.61 |
Pakistan | 1990–1991 | 6,611 | 0.06 | 1.33 | –0.05 | –1.46 |
Philippines | 2003 | 13,633 | 0.03 | 1.15 | –0.01 | –0.57 |
Sri Lanka | 1987 | 5,865 | 0.04 | 1.33 | 0.02 | 0.65 |
Thailand | 1987 | 6,775 | 0.03 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
North Africa | ||||||
Egypt | 2000 | 15,573 | 0.06 | 2.92 | 0.04 | 2.86 |
Morocco | 2003 | 16,798 | 0.04 | 1.43 | –0.02 | –1.07 |
Data for this analysis come from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
Sibling effect is measured according to Eq. (4) in the text.
For details of how the birth-order effect is measured, refer to Observation 2 in the text.