Abstract
Cardiac myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) is a large multi-domain accessory protein bound to myosin thick filaments in striated muscle sarcomeres. It plays an important role in the regulation of muscle contraction and mutations in the gene encoding cMyBP-C are a common cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young people1. The N-terminal domains including the C0, C1, cMyBP-C motif, and C2 domains play a crucial role in maintaining and modulating actomyosin interactions (keeping normal cardiac function) in a phosphorylation dependent manner. The cMyBP-C motif or “M-domain” is a highly conserved linker domain in the N-terminus of cMyBP-C that contains three to five protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation sites, depending on species. For the human isoform, three PKA sites were previously identified (Ser275, Ser284, and Ser304), while three homologous sites exist in the murine isoform (Ser273, Ser282, and Ser302). The murine cMyBP-C isoform contains an additional conserved consensus site, Ser307 that is not present in the human isoform. In this study, we investigated sites of PKA phosphorylation of murine and human cMyBP-C by treating the recombinant protein C0C2 (~50 KDa, which contains the N-terminal C0, C1, M, and C2 domains) and C1C2 (~35 KDa, contains C1, M and C2 domains) with PKA and assessing the phosphorylation states using SDS-PAGE with ProQ Diamond staining, and powerful hybrid mass spectrometric analyses. Both high-accuracy bottom-up and measurements of intact proteins mass spectrometric approaches were used to determine the phosphorylation states of C0C2 and C1C2 proteins with or without PKA treatment. Herein, we report for the first time that there are four PKA phosphorylation sites in both murine and human M-domains; both murine Ser307 and a novel human Ser311 can be phosphorylated in vitro by PKA. Future studies are needed to investigate the phosphorylation state of murine and human cMyBP-C in vivo.
Keywords: cardiac myosin binding protein-C, phosphorylation, mass spectrometry, bottom-up, measurement of intact protein, LTQ-Orbitrap
Introduction
Myosin binding protein-C (MyBP-C)1 is an accessory protein of vertebrate striated muscle that regulates actomyosin interactions and influences the rate and power of muscle contraction.2, 3 Mutations in the gene encoding the cardiac (c) isoform of MyBP-C are a major cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a leading cause of sudden cardiac death in the young and of heart failure in older populations.1, 4, 5 cMyBP-C also contributes to cardiac contractility on a beat-to-beat basis and is phosphorylated in response to inotropic stimuli, including β-adrenergic agonists that activate protein kinase A (PKA).6 PKA phosphorylates cMyBP-C on at least three serine residues (Ser275, Ser284, and Ser304 (human numbering)) clustered within a unique regulatory sequence referred to as the MyBP-C “motif” or “M-domain” (Figure S1). Phosphorylation of cMyBP-C by PKA speeds actomyosin interactions and contributes to increased cardiac contractility following β-adrenergic stimulation.7, 8 Phosphorylation by PKA is essential for proper cardiac function because cMyBP-C transgenic mice with selected phosphorylation sites blocked (serine to alanine substitutions)7, 9, 10 show cardiac dysfunction and develop hypertrophy. In humans, reduced cMyBP-C phosphorylation is also associated with cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.11, 12 Conversely, phosphorylation of cMyBP-C appears cardioprotective because transgenic mice that constitutively express phosphorylated cMyBP-C (serine to aspartic acid substitutions) show normal cardiac function and survive ischemic challenges better than wild type mice.13
Although the significance of cMyBP-C phosphorylation to cardiac health is becoming increasingly apparent, the precise sites and stoichiometry of phosphate incorporation within cMyBP-C have not yet been completely characterized and species-specific differences are likely to exist. For instance, PKA treatment of bovine cMyBP-C resulted in the incorporation of 5 mol Pi/mol of cMyBP-C,14 whereas 3 mol Pi were incorporated into chicken cMyBP-C.15 For human cMyBP-C, PKA treatment of overlapping recombinant fragments that spanned the entire protein was consistent with 3 mol Pi/mol as determined by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry.16, 17 However, recent studies of human donor hearts showed a total level of 4.6 ± 0.6 mol Pi/mol cMyBP-C phosphorylation,11 suggesting that additional sites beyond the three serine residues are phosphorylated by kinases in vivo.
Additional phosphorylation sites within the M-domain were recently described for rat and canine cMyBP-C using MS/MS methods. For rat, one additional serine was found phosphorylated downstream of the three canonical sites identified in human18, whereas three additional serine residues were phosphorylated in dog heart following myocardial stunning19. Although the specific kinase(s) responsible for phosphorylation of these serine residues were not identified, their consensus sequences are completely conserved in mouse cMyBP-C and to a lesser extent in the human isoform (Figure S1). The latter observations raise the possibility that these sites are utilized in mouse or human cMyBP-C. Although a recent mass spectrometric analysis of baculovirus expressed murine cMyBP-C did not find evidence for phosphorylation at these sites, the cMyBP-C samples were not treated with PKA prior to analysis.20
Mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the identification of proteins and the characterization of variable protein posttranslational modifications (PTMs).21-26 Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry has played an important role in the analysis of PTMs, and with additional HPLC, is capable of measuring the mass of macromolecules with high accuracy.22, 27, 28 Currently, there are two general complementary approaches for the mass spectrometry analysis of proteins;29-31 the bottom-up approach where proteolytic peptides and PTM sites are identified via the tandem MS and/or multistage activation strategy,22, 32, 33 and the top-down approach which involves the analysis of intact proteins.28, 34-36 Sometimes, the bottom-up method is limited because the peptides containing the PTMs are lost during the separation step.29, 30, 37, 38 As a complementary method, the proteins can be identified using the top-down approach or solo mass measurements of intact proteins28, 37 thus providing global PTMs information.
The purpose of the present study was to characterize the phosphorylation state of both the murine and human cMyBP-C M-domains in response to PKA using a hybrid approach, which utilizes both bottom-up approach and measurements of intact proteins thus increasing our confidence of protein identification and PTM characterization. Nanospray (nano-) LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digests of recombinant proteins containing cMyBP-C N-terminal domains using an LTQ-OrbitrapXL mass spectrometer was used to identify phosphorylation sites within the M-domain of cMyBP-C after PKA treatment. Due to the low abundance (sub-stoichiometric amounts) of protein phosphorylation and the low ionization efficiency of phosphopeptides in the commonly used positive-ion mode of mass spectrometry,32, 39 enrichment of phosphopeptides using IMAC40 and/or titanium dioxide41 was used prior to their characterization. In the second approach, a high mass bench top orthogonal acceleration TOF type instrument was used to analyze the accurate mass of intact cMyBP-C N-terminal recombinant proteins to validate the observed phosphorylation sites. A biochemical mutation study (Ser to Asp) in murine cMyBP-C clearly demonstrated the discovery of a fourth PKA phosphorylation site. Our results indicate that PKA phosphorylates up to four sites in both the murine and human M-domains including a novel site not previously described for either protein (Ser307 for mouse and Ser311 for human). These additional sites may contribute to the normal physiological function of cMyBP-C.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and materials
Ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium acetate, DL-dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide (IAA), and protein kinase A (bovine catalytic subunit) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Ni-NTA resin was obtained from Qiagen (Valenica, CA). Sequencing grade trypsin was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Micro Bio-Spin™ chromatography columns (Bio-Gel P-6 polyacrylamide gel) were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). PhosphoProfile™ I phosphopeptide enrichment kit containing gallium(III) chelate silica mini-spin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. TopTip filled with TiO2 were purchased from Glygen (Columbia, MD). All other chemicals were HPLC grade purchased from Fisher and used without further purification.
cMyBP-C protein preparation and purification
Recombinant murine proteins muC0C2 (contains the N-terminal C0, C1, M and C2 domains of cMyBP-C) and muC1C2 (contains the C1, M and C2 domains) were cloned from the cDNA encoding the full-length murine cMyBP-C protein (GenBank gi:3747133) as described previously.42 muC0C2 and muC1C2 were expressed in E.coli and purified using his-tags and Ni-NTA affinity chromatography as described previously.43 Recombinant human C0C2 (huC0C2) and C1C2 (huC1C2) were cloned from human cDNA obtained by RT-PCR from whole heart human total RNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using a one-step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting 2 kb PCR product was subcloned into the pCR 2.1 Topo vector (Invitrogen). PCR products encoding huC0C2 and huC1C2 were generated using gene specific primers flanking the desired domains (huC0C2 forward primer 5’-GGCCCATATGCCTGAGCCGGGGAAGAAG-3’, reverse primer 5’-GGCCAAGCTTTCACTCTTTCACAAAGAGCTCCGTGCT-3’; huC1C2 forward primer 5’-GGCCCATATGGATGACCCCATTCGCCTCTTCGTC-3’, reverse primer 5’-GGCCAAGCTTTCACTCTTTCACAAAGAGCTCCGTGCT-3’) and cloned into the pQE-2 expression vector (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Expression and purification of huC0C2 and huC1C2 were as described previously.43 Protein concentrations were determined by measuring light absorbance at 280 nm (corrected for turbidity at 310 nm) and using calculated extinction coefficients from the Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics.44
In vitro PKA phosphorylation of C0C2 and C1C2
Expressed recombinant proteins were treated with protein kinase A (PKA, Sigma P2645) as described previously.16, 45 Proteins (1 mg/ml) were dialyzed against a buffer containing (in mmol/L): 20 HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 KCl, 10 MgCl2, 1 ATP, and 1 DTT. PKA was resuspended in 6 mg/ml DTT and added to protein at 40 U PKA/mg protein along with an additional 1 mM ATP (2 mM final ATP concentration). The reaction was incubated at 4 °C for > 5 hours and then applied to a Ni-NTA column (Qiagen) to purify protein from PKA. Phosphorylation was confirmed by ProQ Diamond staining followed by Sypro Ruby staining (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The method of Ser-Asp mutation analysis of murine C1C2 protein was shown in supporting information.
In-solution tryptic digestion of proteins
The recombinant proteins (1 μg/μL) were buffer-exchanged into 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.8) using Micro Biospin columns. A final concentration of 5.5 mM DTT was added in 270 μL protein (100 μg) solutions to reduce disulfide bonds and incubated for 45 min at 56 °C. The resulting free thiol (-SH) groups were subsequently alkylated with IAA (10 mM final concentration) for 1 hr in the dark at room temperature. Then trypsin was added in a final enzyme:substrate ratio of 1: 50, and the digestion was carried out at 37 °C for 8 hr. The reaction was quenched by flash freezing the sample with liquid nitrogen. The tryptic digest was dried down and stored at -80 °C for further analysis.
Enrichment of tryptic phosphopeptides
Mini-spin columns containing gallium (III) chelate silica were used for the enrichment of phosphopeptides as recommended by the manufacturer with minor modifications (details in supporting information).
The phosphopeptides were also enriched using TopTips filled with TiO2 (particle size 20~30 μm, Glygen Corp., Columbia, MD) as described in the manufacturer’s instruction with minor modifications. Briefly, TiO2 TopTips were equilibrated with 4×50 μL 0.1% TFA containing 10% ACN previously. Forty μg of the dried tryptic digest was reconstituted in 25 μL of the same solution and loaded onto TopTips with 100 repetitions assuring adequate column binding. The loaded tip was rinsed with 4×50 μL 0.1% TFA containing 10% ACN and then with 2×50 μL of MilliQ water (18 MΩ·cm) to remove unbound peptides. Finally the bound phosphopeptides were eluted sequentially with 2×50 μL of 200 mM ammonium hydroxide and 2×50 μL of 200 mM ammonium hydroxide in 10% ACN. All elution fractions were mixed, dried down and reconstituted in a solution of 2% ACN with 1% TFA just prior to nano- RPLC -MS/MS analysis.
Nano-RPLC-MS2 and MS3 analysis of cMyBP-C tryptic digest
Nano-RPLC tandem mass spectrometric analysis was performed on an LTQ-OrbitrapXL mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) equipped with an ADVANCE nanospray ion source (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA), a Surveyor MS pump (ThermoFisher), and a microautosampler (ThermoFisher). The dried tryptic peptide mixture was dissolved in 2% ACN with 1% TFA and separated on a 100-μm-ID IntegraFrit™ column (New Objective, Woburn, MA) packed in house with reversed-phase C18 material. The column was packed to a length of 18 cm with a 100% methanol slurry of Magic C18AQ material (5 μm particle size, 200-Å pore size, Michrom Bioresources) using a high pressure cell pressurized with helium. The column was equilibrated before sample injection. Then the sample was loaded for 20 min at 2% solvent B (0.1% (v/v) formic acid in ACN) and 98% solvent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water) at a flow rate of 250 nL/min. Peptides were resolved by the following gradient at a flow rate of 650 nL/min: 2-10% solvent B in 10 min, 10-35% solvent B in 70 min, 35-70% solvent B in 5 min, then increased to 90% solvent B in 3 min, maintained at 90% for 10 min, and then reversed to 2% buffer B. The LTQ-OrbitrapXL mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent acquisition mode to automatically switch between Orbitrap-MS, Orbitrap-MS2 and Orbitrap-MS3 acquisition. Survey scans were acquired in profile mode and MS2 with MS3 scans were acquired in centroid mode. TOP5 and the neutral loss/MS3 method was used to acquire MS2 and MS3 data (see supporting information).
Peptide identification via MASCOT database search
MASCOT software (version 1.9.05, Matrix Science, London, U.K.) was used for database searching. MASCOT DTA format files were converted from the RAW data files acquired for each LC-MS run using BioworksBrowser software with default parameters (version 3.3.1 SP1, ThermoFisher Scientific). The resulting Sequest (.DTA) files from each run were merged into one single Mascot Generic Format (MGF) file via merge.pl (version 2007.3.9, Matrix Science, downloaded from http://www.matrixscience.com/downloads/merge.zip) and searched against an in-house database (584 protein entries, contained murine and human C1C2, C0C2 sequences, and their reversed sequences, detailed in Supporting Information; the database also contained frequently occurring contaminants including human keratins, porcine trypsin, bovin serum albumin, bovin beta-casein, bovin PKA and their reversed sequences). Searches were performed with tryptic specificity allowing four missed cleavages and a tolerance on the mass measurement of 25 ppm in MS mode and 0.1 Da for MS2 ions. The instrument setting was specified as “ESI-Trap”. Possible structure modifications allowed were protein N-terminal acetylation, carbamidomethylation of Cys; oxidation of Met and phosphorylation of Ser, Thr, and Tyr. All identified peptides have an individual MS2 ion score greater than 18, corresponding to a statistically significant (p value<0.05) confident identification which was set as default by MASCOT algorithm (More details in supporting information).
Mass spectrometry analysis of intact C1C2/C0C2
A nanospray LCT Premier bench top orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (oa-TOF) mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, U.K.) was used to collect mass spectra of the intact muC1C2, muC1C2P and huC1C2 proteins. The analysis was carried out in positive V mode in which the ions are reflected through a reflectron to obtain an instrument resolution of approximately 6,000. Proteins (1 μg/μL) were buffer exchanged into 50 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.5) and 1 mM DTT using Micro Bio-spin P6 columns (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and 5 μL aliquots were introduced via nanoflow capillaries prepared in house. The capillary and cone voltages were set at 1,200 V and 50 V, respectively. The desolvation and source temperatures were set at 200 °C and 50 °C, respectively. All the other voltages were optimized to provide maximal signal intensity in each of the modes. All raw data were processed and measured using Waters MassLynx (Version 4.1). Waters Masslynx MaxEnt 1 software was used to obtain the deconvoluted peak.
A nanospray SYNAPT HDMS hybrid quadrupole ion mobility oa-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, U.K.) was operated in normal Q-TOF mode and used to collect mass spectra of the intact huC1C2P, muC0C2, muC0C2P, huC0C2, and huC0C2P (details in supporting information).
Results and Discussion
In vitro PKA phosphorylation of murine and human C1C2 and C0C2
Both murine and human recombinant proteins C0C2 (contains the four N-terminal C0, C1, M and C2 domains of cMyBP-C (Fig. S1A)), and C1C2 (contains C1, M and C2 domains) were treated with PKA to phosphorylate residues within the M-domain.16, 45 SDS-Page gel analysis with ProQ Diamond staining of proteins before and after PKA treatment confirmed protein phosphorylation (Figure 1). MuC1C2, muC0C2, huC1C2, and huC0C2 do not stain with ProQ Diamond prior to treatment with PKA indicating that these proteins were not phosphorylated following expression in bacteria. However, after treatment with PKA, muC1C2P, muC0C2P, huC1C2P, and huC0C2P phosphorylation was evident as indicated by ProQ Diamond staining.
Figure 1.

PKA phosphorylation of recombinant proteins detected by SDS-PAGE with ProQ Diamond staining. (A) Phosphorylation of muC0C2P and huC0C2P is indicated by ProQ Diamond staining, whereas muC0C2 and huC0C2 were not stained prior to treatment of PKA. Sypro Ruby stains for total protein. (B) muC1C2P and huC1C2P stain with ProQ Diamond, but muC1C2 and huC1C2 do not.
Nano-LC-MS/MS and MS3 analysis of the murine cMyBP-C tryptic digest
The recombinant proteins muC1C2, muC1C2P, muC0C2 and muC0C2P were reduced, alkylated, and digested successively. The resulting murine C1C2/C1C2P/C0C2/C0C2P tryptic peptides were subsequently injected into a nano-RPLC column coupled to a LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer respectively, and both MS2 and MS3 analysis were carried out using data-dependent acquisition mode as described under “Experimental Procedures”. The neutral loss-dependent MS3 mode was used in addition to the data-dependent TOP5 LC-MS/MS acquisition for the correct identification of phosphopeptides and corresponding phosphorylation sites in the cMyBP-C proteins. This strategy has been shown to precisely identify PTMs of proteins.32, 46-48 Results show all 4 murine cMyBP-C proteins (muC1C2, muC1C2P, muC0C2 and muC0C2P) were unambiguously identified with better than 85% sequence coverage (Table I). No phosphorylation sites were found in muC1C2 and muC0C2 prior to treatment with PKA. In contrast, three phosphorylation sites (Ser282, Ser302 and Ser307) were found in muC1C2P and muC0C2P and a fourth phosphorylation site Ser273 was found in muC1C2P and muC0C2P after selective enrichment of phosphopeptides by TiO2 and Ga(III) IMAC (Table II). These results are in agreement with the ProQ Diamond staining results (Fig. 1). There are a total 49 potential phosphorylation sites (27 Ser, 15 Thr and 7 Tyr) and 75 potential phosphorylation sites (43 Ser, 23 Thr and 9 Tyr) in muC1C2 and muC0C2, respectively (Supplemental Figures S2 and S3). However, only four serines were found to be phosphorylated by PKA in vitro, and all four sites are located in the M-domain located between the C1 and C2 domains in the N-terminus of cMyBP-C. This is the first report of the identification of four PKA phosphorylation sites (Ser273, Ser282, Ser302 and Ser307) in murine cMyBP-C, with Ser307 being a novel site.
Table 1.
Identification of reconbinant cMyBP-C fragment proteins and their corresponding PTMs using nano-LC-LTQ-Orbitrap
| Protein Name | Molecular Mass (Da)a | Amino Acids Number | pIb | Unique Peptides Detectedc | Sequence Coverage | Post-translational modifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| muC1C2 | 34636.2 | 309 | 8.18 | 55 | 93% | None |
| muC1C2P | 34956.2 | 309 | 6.42 | 44 | 89% | Ser (P)273, Ser (P)282, Ser (P)302, Ser (P)307 |
| muC0C2 | 49873.0 | 456 | 6.49 | 41 | 85% | None |
| muC0C2P | 50192.9 | 456 | 6.01 | 42 | 93% | Ser (P)273, Ser (P)282, Ser (P)302, Ser (P)307 |
| huC1C2 | 35046.9 | 311 | 8.18 | 44 | 98% | None |
| huC1C2P | 35366.8 | 311 | 6.42 | 62 | 99% | Ser (P)275, Ser (P)284, Ser (P)304, Ser (P)311 |
| huC0C2 | 49956.6 | 460 | 8.12 | 52 | 95% | None |
| huC0C2P | 50276.5 | 460 | 6.46 | 57 | 96% | Ser (P)275, Ser (P)284, Ser (P)304, Ser (P)311 |
Calculated from the theoretical average mass of the corresponding cMyBP-C fragment proteins plus any post-translational modifications identified.
Theoretical pI of each intact protein in its unmodified form was calculated using ProtParam (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protparam.html). The pI of proteins in the phosphorylated form were calculated using pICalculator (version 1.0, downloaded from https://bioinformatics.chem.uu.nl/supplementary/gauci_proteomics/ as an executable java JAR. Use default pKa set in this software according to EXPASY and ProMoST) when the total number of dectected phosphorylation sites were provided.
Only the peptides with MASCOT individual ions scores more than threshold score 18 were accepted (p value<0.05). Covalently modified peptides count as unique; different charge states or multiple fragmentation spectra of the same peptide are excluded.
Table 2.
Phosphopeptides and corresponding phosphorylation sites identified in cMyBP-C fragments tryptic digest using nano-LC-LTQ-Orbitrap
| Phosphorylation Site(s) Identifieda | Protein Source | Peptide Start-enda | Sequence | no. of PO4 | Mr (Da) | Charge State & (MASCOT score b) | LC-MS/MS NLc/MS3 | Without Enrichment | Enrichment |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | IMAC | |||||||||
| Ser (P)273 | muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 271-279 | RTpSLAGAGR | 1 | 967.4600 | 2+(47) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 272-279 | TpSLAGAGR | 1 | 811.3589 | 2+(26) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)282 | muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 280-298 | RTpSDSHEDAGTLDFSSLLK | 1 | 2157.9579 | 2+(58), 3+(33) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 280-299 | RTpSDSHEDAGTLDFSSLLKK | 1 | 2286.0529 | 3+(20) | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
| muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 281-298 | TpSDSHEDAGTLDFSSLLK | 1 | 2001.8568 | 2+(50), 3+(24) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)302 | muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 299-304 | KRDpSFR | 1 | 887.4014 | 2+(23), 3+(21) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| muC1C2P | 300-304 | RDpSFR | 1 | 759.3065 | 2+(25) | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
| muC1C2P | 300-305 | RDpSFRR | 1 | 915.4076 | 2+(23) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |
| muC1C2P | 301-304 | DpSFR | 1 | 603.2054 | 2+(21) | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| muC0C2P | 299-305 | KRDpSFRR | 1 | 1043.5025 | 2+(20) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)302&Ser (P)307 | muC1C2P | 300-322 | RDpSFRRDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 2 | 2976.3531 | 3+(21), 4+(32) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| muC1C2P | 301-322 | DpSFRRDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 2 | 2820.2520 | 3+(49) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| muC0C2P | 299-322 | KRDpSFRRDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 2 | 3104.4481 | 4+(22) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)307 | muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 305-322 | RDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 1 | 2235.0572 | 2+(65), 3+(45) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| muC1C2P&muC0C2P | 306-322 | DpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 1 | 2078.9561 | 2+(49), 3+(24) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)275 | huC1C2P&huC0C2P | 273-281 | RTpSLAGGGR | 1 | 953.4443 | 2+(47) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| huC1C2P | 273-282 | RTpSLAGGGRR | 1 | 1109.5454 | 2+(21) | Yes | NO | Yes | Yes | |
| huC1C2P | 274-281 | TpSLAGGGR | 1 | 797.3432 | 2+(27) | Yes | NO | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)275&Ser (P)284 | huC1C2P | 273-300 | RTpSLAGGGRRIpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLK | 2 | 3147.4750 | 3+(44), 4+(40) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| huC1C2P | 273-301 | RTpSLAGGGRRIpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLKK | 2 | 3275.5700 | 4+(25) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| huC1C2P | 274-300 | TpSLAGGGRRIpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLK | 2 | 2991.3739 | 4+(26) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)284 | huC1C2P&huC0C2P | 282-300 | RIpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLK | 1 | 2212.0412 | 2+(53), 3+(38) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| huC1C2P &huC0C2P | 282-301 | RIpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLKK | 1 | 2340.1362 | 2+(21), 3+(49) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| huC1C2P&huC0C2P | 283-300 | IpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLK | 1 | 2055.9401 | 2+(64), 3+(29) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| huC1C2P | 283-301 | IpSDSHEDTGILDFSSLLKK | 1 | 2184.0351 | 2+(43) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)304 | huC1C2P | 301-309 | KRDpSFRTPR | 1 | 1241.6030 | 2+(20) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| huC1C2P | 302-309 | RDpSFRTPR | 1 | 1113.5080 | 2+(30) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| huC1C2P | 303-309 | DpSFRTPR | 1 | 957.4069 | 2+(22) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| huC0C2P | 301-306 | KRDpSFR | 1 | 887.4014 | 2+(21) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Ser (P)311 | huC1C2P&huC0C2P | 307-326 | TPRDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 1 | 2433.1576 | 3+(51) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| huC1C2P&huC0C2P | 310-326 | DpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR | 1 | 2078.9561 | 2+(54) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
All sites locations refer to their natural positions in vivo.
The threshold score for accepting individual MS/MS spectra is 18, corresponding to a statistically significant (p value<5%) confident identification in MASCOT. All identified phosphopeptides were validated by manual confirmation from raw MS2 and MS3 data.
NL, neutral loss of H3PO4.
Figure 2. shows the identification of Ser(P)307 from muC1C2P using MS/MS and neutral loss/MS3 method. At an elution time of 78.81 min (Fig. 2A), a precursor ion was observed in the Orbitrap survey scan (Fig. 2B) with a 2+ charge state and a monoisotopic mass at m/z of 1118.5392 (Δm= 2.9 ppm). This ion was automatically isolated in the linear ion trap and fragmented by CID to produce the MS/MS spectrum (Fig. 2C) from which the first most intense ion corresponding to the neutral loss precursor ion (m/z = 1069.55) was automatically selected and fragmented to yield an MS3 spectrum (Fig. 2D). All of the precursor ions and fragment ions in MS/MS and MS3 were recorded by the Orbitrap. The tryptic phosphopeptide (amino acids 305–322, murine sequence numbering) was unambiguously identified by the MASCOT search with a top score of 65 (where a score greater than 18 indicates identity corresponding to a statistically significant (p<0.05) confident identification in MASCOT), and Ser307 was identified as being phosphorylated based on the b and y fragment ions present in the MS/MS spectrum. The precursor ion [M+2H]2+ m/z 1118.5392 indicates that there is one phosphorylation site in this peptide (RDpSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR), since the [M+2H]2+ of non-phosphopeptide RDSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR is m/z 1078.5527. Subsequent MS2 analysis showed the neutral loss of H3PO4 (98 Da) occurred on both the b3 ion (RDpS) and the y16 ion (pSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR) (Fig. 2C), and this potential site of phosphorylation was also supported by MS3. The phosphoserine is converted to a dehydroalanine residue during CID, and a predominant series of b and y fragment ions are present in the MS3 spectrum (Fig. 2D). Ser307 in murine cMyBP-C is a novel PKA phosphorylation site that has not been reported previously.
Figure 2.

Identification of the phosphorylation site Ser(P)307 from muC1C2P using neutral loss/MS3 method. A, base peak chromatogram. B, precursor mass scan at 78.81 min using Orbitrap. For illustration purposes, only the 1116.0-1123.0 m/z mass region of the [M+ 2H]2+ ion is shown. C, MS2 scan of the m/z 1118.54 ion. D, MS3 scan of the m/z 1069.55. The peptide sequence identified by MASCOT and validated by manual confirmation from the raw MS2 data is shown in the inset of C. The peptide sequence validated by manual confirmation from the raw MS3 data is shown in the inset of D where dS represents the dehydroalanine residue. pm, precursor ion; pS, phosphoserine.
Nano-LC-MS/MS and MS3 analysis of the human cMyBP-C tryptic digest
In human cMyBP-C, three PKA phosphorylation sites have previously been reported (Ser275, Ser284, and Ser304) 16 using the approach of mass measurements of intact proteins. Ser273, Ser282, and Ser302 are the three homologous sites that exist in the murine isoform which were identified in the present study. Because Ser307 in murine cMyBP-C is also homologous to human cMyBP-C (Ser311), we chose to investigate if Ser311 is phosphorylated by PKA in vitro. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed a sequence coverage of 98% for the huC1C2, 99% for huC1C2P, 95% for huC0C2, and 96% for huC0C2P (see Table I and the online supplemental materials). Four PKA phosphorylation sites were identified: Ser275, Ser284, and Ser304, and Ser311 (Table I, II and supplemental material), with Ser311 being a novel site (Fig. 3). At an elution time of 80.10 min (Fig. 3A), a precursor ion was observed in the Orbitrap survey scan (Fig. 3B) with a 3+ charge state and a monoisotopic mass at m/z of 812.0599 (Δm = 0.1 ppm). This ion was isolated in the linear ion trap and fragmented by CID to produce the MS/MS spectrum (Fig. 3C) from which the first most intense ion corresponding to the neutral loss precursor ion (m/z = 779.40) was selected and fragmented to yield an MS3 spectrum (Fig. 3D). The tryptic phosphopeptide (amino acids 307-326, human sequence numbering) was reported with a MASCOT score of 51, and Ser311 was identified as being phosphorylated based on the b and y fragment ions present in the MS/MS spectrum. Subsequent MS2 analysis showed neutral loss of H3PO4 (98 Da) occurring on the b5 ion (TPRDpS) and y16 ion (pSKLEAPAEEDVWEILR) illustrating Ser5 as phosphorylated (Fig. 3C). Additional MS3 of m/z 779.40 validated the phosphorylation site and peptide sequence.
Figure 3.

Identification of the phosphorylation site Ser(P)311 from huC1C2P using neutral loss/MS3 method. A, base peak chromatogram. B, precursor mass scan at 80.10 min using Orbitrap. For illustration purposes, only the 810.3-815.3 m/z mass region of the [M+ 3H]3+ ion is shown. C, MS2 scan of the m/z 812.06 ion. D, MS3 scan of the m/z 779.40. The peptide sequence identified by MASCOT and validated by manual confirmation from the raw MS2 data is shown in the inset of C. The peptide sequence validated by manual confirmation from the raw MS3 data is shown in the inset of D. pm, precursor ion; pS, phosphoserine; dS, dehydroalanine residue.
Ser(P)311 was not detected in a previous study of human cMyBP-C M-domain PKA phosphorylation.16 One possible reason that the previous study did not observe phosphorylated Ser311 may be due to the unstable state of this phosphorylation site and/or sub-stoichiometric amounts of the phosphopeptides containing the Ser(P)311 site. In this study, we found both phosphorylated Ser311 and un-phosphorylated Ser311 in the same nano-LC-MS/MS run of huC1C2P and huC0C2P. Other identified phosphorylation sites were not found in the un-phosphorylated state. Figure S10 shows the identification of Ser311 (elution time 82.18 min) and Ser(P)311 (89.12 min) from huC1C2P using the nano-LC-MS/MS with neutral loss/MS3 method. Both the un-phosphorylated peptide and phosphopeptide were observed in the same LC-MS/MS analysis of raw protein digests suggesting that this phosphorylation site is unstable and/or in low abundance.
Mass Spectrometric analysis of the intact C1C2/C0C2 proteins
To validate the identified phosphorylation sites in murine and human cMyBP-C recombinant proteins, the accurate mass of the intact (i.e., undigested) proteins were measured by ESI-TOF mass spectrometry. The employment of LCT Premier bench-top oa-TOF allowed observation of the intact muC1C2 and muC1C2P protein as shown in Fig. 4. The measured molecular mass of the muC1C2 is 34635.1±2.9 Da (Fig. 4A). The mass difference between measured and theoretical value is 1.2 Da (35 ppm) which indicates that there are no PTMs in muC1C2 protein. The measured molecular mass of the muC1C2P is 34953.6±0.5 Da (Fig. 4B). Good correlation (2.6 Da, 74 ppm) between experimental mass and the theoretical mass (34956.2 Da) of muC1C2P indicates the presence of four phosphorylation sites in this protein. Given the data from the mass measurement analysis of intact muC1C2 and muC1C2P protein, we can validate that muC1C2P is tetra-phosphorylated. More mass measurements analysis about intact muC0C2/muC0C2P, huC1C2/huC1C2P and huC0C2/huC0C2P were also confirmed our discovery from bottom-up approach (Figures S11-13).
Figure 4.

Mass spectrometric analysis of the intact muC1C2 protein and muC1C2P protein. (a) Identification of muC1C2 protein. (b) Identification of muC1C2P protein. The inset spectra represent the deconvoluted mass of muC1C2 and muC1C2P respectively, which calculated by Waters Masslynx MaxEnt 1 software. The theoretical average mass of the protein was calculated by Waters MassLynx. The corresponding charge states are indicated on each peak in the raw data.
The finding of a fourth PKA site in the mouse cMyBP-C M-domain (Ser307) was anticipated because a homologous site was recently identified in the rat and the dog (note exact sequence homology, Figure S1). However, the presence of a fourth PKA site in the M-domain of the human isoform (Ser311) was more of a surprise, as previously only three PKA sites had been identified in the human isoform16, 17 and the five amino acids leading up to and including Ser311 (307TPRDS311) does not constitute a usual PKA phosphorylation site motif.49 Previous studies used recombinant huC1C2 and identified three sites through site-directed mutagenesis and mass spectrometry analysis of intact proteins.16, 17 In this study, we found that the intensities of the intact protein peaks that correspond to huC0C2P and huC1C2P containing four phosphate groups were smaller than the intensities of peaks corresponding to huC0C2P and huC1C2P containing three phosphate groups (Figures S12 and S13). Due to this and the variable phosphorylation indicated by the bottom-up results, it is likely that Ser(P)311 was not detected in previous studies.
Confirmation that Ser307 is phosphorylated in muC1C2 using site-directed mutagenesis
Mutant muC1C2 proteins were created that contained substitutions of phosphorylatable serine residues to aspartic acid residues in order to block phosphorylation by PKA and thus determine specific phosphorylation sites. As shown in Fig. 5, after treatment with PKA muC1C2 stains with ProQ Diamond, indicating phosphorylation. The mutant muC1C2(3S-D) (containing S273D, S282D, and S302D mutations) was created to block PKA phosphorylation at the first three PKA phosphorylation sites, but not the novel Ser307 site determined in the mass spectrometric analyses. After treatment with PKA, muC1C2(3S-D) stained with ProQ Diamond (Fig. 5), indicating PKA phosphorylation at additional serine residues, likely at Ser307. The mutant muC1C2(4S-D) (containing the mutations S273D, S282D, S302D, and S307D) was next created to block PKA phosphorylation at all four PKA phosphorylation sites. Treatment of muC1C2(4S-D) with PKA did not further phosphorylate the mutant protein (Fig. 5), demonstrating that Ser307 is phosphorylated in vitro by PKA.
Figure 5.

Mutation analysis shows that Ser307 is phosphorylated in muC1C2. Recombinant muC1C2 proteins were treated with PKA and analyzed using SDS-PAGE with ProQ Diamond staining (phosphoprotein) and Sypro Ruby (total protein). C1C2(3S-D) contains the mutations S273D, S282D, and S302D. When treated with PKA, C1C2(3S-D) stains with ProQ Diamond, indicating additional phosphorylation by PKA. C1C2(4S-D) contains the mutations S273D, S282D, S302D, and S307D. PKA treatment of C1C2(4S-D) did not result in ProQ Diamond staining, indicating that phosphorylation is completely blocked by the aspartic acid substitutions, and confirming that Ser307 is phosphorylated by PKA in muC1C2.
Conclusion
The goal of this study was to assess the phosphorylation state of the human and murine cMyBP-C motif, or M-domains using mass spectrometry. These results mark the first time that complete mass spectrometric analyses (bottom-up approach and accurate mass measurement of intact proteins) were used to assess the phosphorylation state of the N-terminus of murine cMyBP-C. The significant findings of this study were the identification of four PKA phosphorylation sites in both the human and murine isoforms, with the characterization of novel sites (Ser311 and Ser307 in the human and murine isoforms, respectively). These results provide further evidence towards the complete characterization of the phosphorylation state of cMyBP-C.
The incorporation of complementary bottom-up mass spectrometry approach and mass measurements of intact proteins method were used to characterize the phosphorylation state of murine and human cMyBP-C recombinant proteins after PKA treatment in vitro. Although the accurate measurements of intact proteins readily provide excellent intact protein masses which indicate post-translational modifications, it can miss some PTMs due to sub-stoichiometric amounts and/or dynamic time duration. And moreover, it may represent heterogeneous populations of the proteins which mean the underlying proteins may feature the same number of PTMs but at different sites. In contrast, the bottom-up method can provide good sequence coverage and precise locations of PTM sites. Combining the bottom-up and accurate mass measurements of intact proteins provides both maximum coverage and precise PTM identification. In this study, all of the proteins obtained higher than 85% sequence coverage. Ser273, Ser282, Ser302 and Ser307 in murine isoforms and Ser275, Ser284, Ser304 and Ser311 in human isoforms can be phosphorylated by PKA in vitro. The biochemical mutation analysis (Ser to Asp) also demonstrated this discovery in murine isoform proteins. But whether the novel discovered phosphorylation sites will carry physiological significance is still unclear; future studies are needed to verify usage of these phosphorylation sites in murine and human cMyBP-C following PKA stimulation in vivo.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Raluca Stefanescu of the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology University of California Davis for fruitful discussions and the help to operate SYNAPT. This work was supported, in whole of in part, by National Institutes of Health Program Project Grant GM073732 to J.A.L, HL080367 to S.P.H and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to J.F.S.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Supplementary materials containing more detailed technical information of methods, sequence information of proteins, schematic diagram of various species of cMyBP-C M-domains, more MS2 and MS3 spectra of identified phosphorylation sites, and more mass spectra of intact proteins. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Contributor Information
Weitao Jia, Email: wtjia@ucdavis.edu.
Justin F. Shaffer, Email: jfshaffer@ucdavis.edu.
Samantha P. Harris, Email: samharris@ucdavis.edu.
Julie A. Leary, Email: jaleary@ucdavis.edu.
References
- 1.Richard P, Villard E, Charron P, Isnard R. The genetic bases of cardiomyopathies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(9):A79–A89. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stelzer JE, Fitzsimons DP, Moss RL. Ablation of myosin-binding protein-C accelerates force development in mouse myocardium. Biophys J. 2006;90(11):4119–27. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.078147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Korte FS, McDonald KS, Harris SP, Moss RL. Loaded shortening, power output, and rate of force redevelopment are increased with knockout of cardiac myosin binding protein-C. Circ Res. 2003;93(8):752–58. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000096363.85588.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dhandapany PS, Sadayappan S, Xue YL, Powell GT, Rani DS, Nallari P, Rai TS, Khullar M, Soares P, Bahl A, Tharkan JM, Vaideeswar P, Rathinavel A, Narasimhan C, Ayapati DR, Ayub Q, Mehdi SQ, Oppenheimer S, Richards MB, Price AL, Patterson N, Reich D, Singh L, Tyler-Smith C, Thangaraj K. A common MYBPC3 (cardiac myosin binding protein C) variant associated with cardiomyopathies in South Asia. Nature Genet. 2009;41(2):187–91. doi: 10.1038/ng.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tardiff JC. Sarcomeric proteins and familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Linking mutations in structural proteins to complex cardiovascular phenotypes. Heart Fail Rev. 2005;10(3):237–48. doi: 10.1007/s10741-005-5253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jeacocke SA, England PJ. Phosphorylation of a myofibrillar protein of Mr 150000 in perfused rat-heart, and the tentative identification of this as C-protein. FEBS Lett. 1980;122(1):129–32. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80418-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tong CW, Stelzer JE, Greaser ML, Powers PA, Moss RL. Acceleration of Crossbridge Kinetics by Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation of Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C Modulates Cardiac Function. Circ Res. 2008;103(9):974–U166. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stelzer JE, Patel JR, Walker JW, Moss RL. Differential roles of cardiac myosin-binding protein C and cardiac troponin I in the myofibrillar force responses to protein kinase a phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2007;101(5):503–11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nagayama T, Takimoto E, Sadayappan S, Mudd JO, Seidman JG, Robbins J, Kass DA. Control of in vivo contraction/relaxation kinetics by myosin binding protein C: Protein kinase A phosphorylation-dependent and -independent regulation. Circulation. 2007;116(21):2399–408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.706523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sadayappan S, Gulick J, Osinska H, Martin LA, Hahn HS, Dorn GW, Klevitsky R, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Robbins J. Cardiac myosin-binding protein-C phosphorylation and cardiac function. Circ Res. 2005;97(11):1156–63. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000190605.79013.4d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jacques AM, Copeland O, Messer AE, Gallon CE, King K, McKenna WJ, Tsang VT, Marston SB. Myosin binding protein C phosphorylation in normal, hypertrophic and failing human heart muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;45(2):209–16. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.El-Armouche A, Pohlmann L, Schlossarek S, Starbatty J, Yeh YH, Nattel S, Dobrev D, Eschenhagen T, Carrier L. Decreased phosphorylation levels of cardiac myosin-binding protein-C in human and experimental heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;43(2):223–29. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sadayappan S, Osinska H, Klevitsky R, Lorenz JN, Sargent M, Molkentin JD, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Robbins J. Cardiac myosin binding protein C phosphorylation is cardioprotective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(45):16918–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607069103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lim MS, Sutherland C, Walsh MP. Phosphorylation of bovine cardiac c-protein by protein kinase-C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985;132(3):1187–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(85)91932-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hartzell HC, Glass DB. Phosphorylation of purified cardiac-muscle c-protein by purified camp-dependent and endogenous Ca-2+-calmodulin-dependent protein-kinases. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(24):5587–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gruen M, Prinz H, Gautel M. CAPK-phosphorylation controls the interaction of the regulatory domain of cardiac myosin binding protein C with myosin-S2 in an on-off fashion. FEBS Lett. 1999;453(3):254–59. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00727-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gautel M, Zuffardi O, Freiburg A, Labeit S. Phosphorylation switches specific for the cardiac isoform of myosin binding protein-C - a modulator of cardiac contraction. Embo J. 1995;14(9):1952–60. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07187.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yuan C, Sheng QH, Tang HX, Li YX, Zeng R, Solaro RJ. Quantitative comparison of sarcomeric phosphoproteomes of neonatal and adult rat hearts. Am J Physiol -Heart Circul Physiol. 2008;295(2):H647–H56. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00357.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuan C, Guo YR, Ravi R, Przyklenk K, Shilkofski N, Diez R, Cole RN, Murphy AM. Myosin binding protein C is differentially phosphorylated upon myocardial stunning in canine and rat hearts - Evidence for novel phosphorylation sites. Proteomics. 2006;6(14):4176–86. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ge Y, Rybakova IN, Xu QG, Moss RL. Top-down high-resolution mass spectrometry of cardiac myosin binding protein C revealed that truncation alters protein phosphorylation state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(31):12658–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813369106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McLafferty FW. Mass spectrometry across the sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18088–89. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800784105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Witze ES, Old WM, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2007;4(10):798–806. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tyers M, Mann M. From genomics to proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):193–97. doi: 10.1038/nature01510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198–207. doi: 10.1038/nature01511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Electrospray ionization for mass-spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 1989;246(4926):64–71. doi: 10.1126/science.2675315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Costello CE. Bioanalytic applications of mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10(1):22–28. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(99)80005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meng FY, Forbes AJ, Miller LM, Kelleher NL. Detection and localization of protein modifications by high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2005;24(2):126–34. doi: 10.1002/mas.20009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han XM, Jin M, Breuker K, McLafferty FW. Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses greater than 200 kilodaltons. Science. 2006;314(5796):109–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1128868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chait BT. Mass spectrometry: Bottom-up or top-down? Science. 2006;314(5796):65–66. doi: 10.1126/science.1133987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.VerBerkmoes NC, Bundy JL, Hauser L, Asano KG, Razumovskaya J, Larimer F, Hettich RL, Stephenson JL. Integrating “top-down” and “bottom-up” mass spectrometric approaches for proteomic analysis of Shewanella oneidensis. J Proteome Res. 2002;1(3):239–52. doi: 10.1021/pr025508a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kelleher NL, Lin HY, Valaskovic GA, Aaserud DJ, Fridriksson EK, McLafferty FW. Top down versus bottom up protein characterization by tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121(4):806–12. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell. 2006;127(3):635–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Olsen JV, Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(37):13417–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405549101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Siuti N, Kelleher NL. Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2007;4(10):817–21. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Patrie SM, Ferguson JT, Robinson DE, Whipple D, Rother M, Metcalf WW, Kelleher NL. Top down mass spectrometry of < 60-kDa proteins from Methanosarcina acetivorans using quadrupole FTMS with automated octopole collisionally activated dissociation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(1):14–25. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500219-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kelleher NL. Top-down proteomics. Anal Chem. 2004;76(11):196A–203A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yu YH, Ji H, Doudna JA, Leary JA. Mass spectrometric analysis of the human 40S ribosomal subunit: Native and HCVIRES-bound complexes. Protein Sci. 2005;14(6):1438–46. doi: 10.1110/ps.041293005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.MacCoss MJ, McDonald WH, Saraf A, Sadygov R, Clark JM, Tasto JJ, Gould KL, Wolters D, Washburn M, Weiss A, Clark JI, Yates JR. Shotgun identification of protein modifications from protein complexes and lens tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(12):7900–05. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122231399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Steen H, Jebanathirajah JA, Rush J, Morrice N, Kirschner MW. Phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry - Myths, facts, and the consequences for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(1):172–81. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500135-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat Methods. 2007;4(3):231–37. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJD. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(7):873–86. doi: 10.1074/mcp.T500007-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Razumova MV, Shaffer JF, Tu AY, Flint GV, Regnier M, Harris SP. Effects of the N-terminal domains of myosin binding protein-C in an in vitro motility assay - Evidence for long-lived cross-bridges. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(47):35846–54. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606949200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jeffries CM, Whitten AE, Harris SP, Trewhella J. Small-angle X-ray scattering reveals the N-terminal domain organization of cardiac myosin binding protein C. J Mol Biol. 2008;377(4):1186–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, Bairoch A. ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3784–88. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shaffer JF, Kensler RW, Harris SP. The Myosin-binding Protein C Motif Binds to F-actin in a phosphorylation-sensitive Manner. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(18):12318–27. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808850200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Villen J, Li JX, Cohn MA, Cantley LC, Gygi SP. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(33):12130–35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404720101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S, Mortensen P, Faergeman NJ, Mann M, Jensen ON. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(3):310–27. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M400219-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Damoc E, Fraser CS, Zhou M, Videler H, Mayeur GL, Hershey JWB, Doudna JA, Robinson CV, Leary JA. Structural characterization of the human eukaryotic initiation factor 3 protein complex by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6(7):1135–46. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600399-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pearson RB, Kemp BE. Protein kinase phosphorylation site sequences and consensus specificity motifs:tabulations. Meth Enzymol. 1991;200:62–81. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)00127-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
