Abstract
Long-lived microtubules found in ciliary axonemes, neuronal processes, and migrating cells are marked by α-tubulin acetylation on lysine 40, a modification that takes place inside the microtubule lumen. The physiological importance of microtubule acetylation remains elusive. Here, we identify a BBSome-associated protein that we name αTAT1, with a highly specific α-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase activity and a catalytic preference for microtubules over free tubulin. In mammalian cells, the catalytic activity of αTAT1 is necessary and sufficient for α-tubulin K40 acetylation. Remarkably, αTAT1 is universally and exclusively conserved in ciliated organisms, and is required for the acetylation of axonemal microtubules and for the normal kinetics of primary cilium assembly. In Caenorhabditis elegans, microtubule acetylation is most prominent in touch receptor neurons (TRNs) and MEC-17, a homolog of αTAT1, and its paralog αTAT-2 are required for α-tubulin acetylation and for two distinct types of touch sensation. Furthermore, in animals lacking MEC-17, αTAT-2, and the sole C. elegans K40α-tubulin MEC-12, touch sensation can be restored by expression of an acetyl-mimic MEC-12[K40Q]. We conclude that αTAT1 is the major and possibly the sole α-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase in mammals and nematodes, and that tubulin acetylation plays a conserved role in several microtubule-based processes.
Keywords: cytoskeleton, posttranslational modification, cilia, Bardet-Biedl Syndrome, ciliopathy
Long-lived, stable microtubules are found inside neuronal processes and cilia and provide stable tracks for motors. Stable microtubules also play essential and conserved roles in the sense of touch and harbor a variety of posttranslational modifications such as detyrosination, polyglutamylation, and N-acetylation of ε-lysines (1). Although most known modifications are displayed on the outside of the microtubule lattice, the major acetylation site in ciliary microtubules is located on lysine-40 of α-tubulin, a residue that points into the lumen of microtubules (2). Thus far, the functional consequences of α-tubulin K40 acetylation have remained perplexing, as genetic alteration of α-tubulin K40 has failed to produce detectable phenotypes in either protozoa (3, 4) or nematodes (5). Nonetheless, recent evidence suggest that kinesin-1 preferentially travels on acetylated microtubule tracks (6, 7) and that α-tubulin K40 acetylation is required for radial glial cell migration (8). These various data have made the physiological role of α-tubulin K40 acetylation subject to debates that have not been resolved because of a lack of tools for eliminating α-tubulin K40 acetylation. In particular, although two α-tubulin K40 deacetylases are known, the identity of the α-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase (αK40 TAT or αTAT) remains unknown (1), despite recent suggestions that some histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and N-acetyltransferases influence microtubule acetylation (9, 10).
Results
A BBSome-Associated Protein Specifically Acetylates Lysine 40 of α-Tubulin in Vitro.
We previously showed that a subunit of the BBSome, a ciliary trafficking complex, is required for α-tubulin K40 acetylation (11). Recently, we copurified C6orf134, an uncharacterized protein, together with the BBSome (12), and we confirmed that C6orf134 directly binds to the BBSome (Fig. 1A). Intriguingly, C6orf134 is predicted to harbor the GNAT fold found in HATs (13). We thus hypothesized that C6orf134 is the long-sought TAT responsible for K40 acetylation of α-tubulin. To test this assumption, we assayed recombinant C6orf134 for enzymatic transfer of acetyl from acetyl-CoA onto tubulin. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found robust incorporation of radiolabeled acetyl into tubulin—as much as 0.51 mol/mol (Fig. 1C)—and a concomitant increase in the immunoreactivity for mAb 6-11B-1 (Fig. 1 B and D), an antibody that specifically recognizes α-tubulin K40Ac (14). The time courses of [14C]acetyl incorporation and K40Ac synthesis were similar (Fig. 1 C and D). Similar findings were reported independently (15). C6orf134 was thus renamed αTAT1.
The boundaries of the predicted GNAT fold and of the minimal acetyltransferase domain of αTAT1 are nearly identical (Fig. 1 E–G), suggesting that the mechanism of acetyl group transfer is conserved between αTAT1 and HATs. To test this idea and to generate a catalytically inactive αTAT1, we searched for conserved acidic residues, as most GNAT family members use an acidic residue for catalysis. We identified D157 and found that αTAT1[D157N] failed to acetylate purified tubulin (Figs. 1 F and H). Thus, the TAT activity resides within αTAT1 and not a contaminant.
Recent proteome-wide studies have found multiple acetylated lysines on α- and β-tubulin (16). We therefore tested whether lysines other than α-tubulin K40 are acetylated by αTAT1 in vitro. Although αTAT1 acetylates tubulin purified from WT Tetrahymena, it is unable to acetylate tubulin purified from an α-tubulin[K40R] knock-in Tetrahymena strain (Fig. 2A). Thus, αTAT1 specifically acetylates K40 of α-tubulin. In further support of this conclusion, we calculated that the total amount of acetyl deposited onto tubulin is nearly identical to the amount of acetyl specifically incorporated at K40 of α-tubulin (Fig. 1 C and D).
All protein lysine acetyltransferases (KAT) identified to date have been HATs, and some HATs acetylate nonhistone substrates (17). To determine the substrate specificity of αTAT1, we incubated recombinant αTAT1 with either recombinant histone H3/H4 (Fig. 2B) or purified core histones (Fig. S1A) and found that αTAT1 is unable to detectably acetylate any of the core histones, whereas HAT1/RbAp46 efficiently acetylates histone H4 under the same conditions. Furthermore, HAT1/RbAp46 was unable to acetylate tubulin (Fig. S1A). Thus, αTAT1 is a KAT that is not a HAT.
αTAT1 Exhibits Substrate Specificity for Tubulin in the Polymerized Form.
Microtubule acetylation takes place after microtubule assembly (18, 19). It is therefore thought that the αK40 TAT preferentially targets tubulin in the polymerized state. Substrate saturation curves showed that αTAT1 follows a classic Michaelis–Menten behavior using both free tubulin and taxol-stabilized microtubules as substrates (Fig. 2C). Surprisingly, although the Km values for tubulin and microtubules were not significantly different, the turnover rate (kcat) of αTAT1 for microtubules was more than sixfold greater than for free tubulin. Thus, αTAT1 preferentially acetylates polymerized microtubules over free tubulin at saturating substrate concentrations. Given that tubulin concentration varies between 20 and 200 μM in cells (20) and that nearly 40% of tubulin is polymerized in cells (Fig. 3H), αTAT1 is expected to operate at saturating substrate concentrations in vivo and to preferentially acetylate microtubules over free tubulin inside cells.
We note that the turnover rate of αTAT1 is extremely low (kcat for microtubules = 2.2 h−1) and αTAT1 will therefore require tens of minutes to efficiently acetylate microtubules. In mammalian cells, maximum levels of αK40 acetylation require incubations with taxol for several hours (21). Thus, the enzymatic rate constants of αTAT1 fit adequately with the kinetics of tubulin acetylation inside the cell. Finally, we determined the enzymatic constant of αTAT1 for acetyl-CoA (Fig. S1D) and found a nearly identical Km value to the previously purified TAT (22).
αTAT1 Is Necessary and Sufficient to Acetylate α-Tubulin at K40 in Mammalian Cells.
Our biochemical findings led us to examine the activity of αTAT1 inside mammalian cells. It is known that PtK2 cells have no detectable α-tubulin K40 acetylation (21). Transient overexpression of αTAT1 in PtK2 cells was sufficient to acetylate nearly all microtubules, whereas catalytically inactive αTAT1[D157N] or the HAT Elp3 failed to detectably elevate α-tubulin K40 acetylation (Fig. 3 A and B). Similar results were found in RPE-hTERT cells (Fig. S2). Thus, the catalytic activity of αTAT1 is sufficient to acetylate α-tubulin at K40 in mammalian cells.
Next, we determined the contribution of αTAT1 to microtubule acetylation in RPE-hTERT cells. Two independent siRNA duplexes targeting αTAT1 reduced αTAT1 mRNA and protein by more than 80% (Fig. 3 C and D). Strikingly, acetylation of α-tubulin at K40 was reduced by more than 80% after depletion of αTAT1, thus indicating the αTAT1 is the major αK40 TAT in mammalian cells (Fig. 3 D and F). The levels of polyglutamylated tubulin, a marker of ultrastable microtubules found in cilia and centrioles, remained unaffected by αTAT1 depletion (Fig. 3D). αTAT1-depleted cells did not exhibit any gross morphological or proliferation defects (Fig. 3 E and G). Furthermore, αTAT1 depletion did not affect bulk microtubule polymerization, as judged qualitatively by immunofluorescence (Fig. 3E) and quantitatively by microtubule spindown assays (Fig. 3H). Thus, tubulin acetylation is not required for cell cycle progression or for general microtubule organization.
αTAT1 Promotes Primary Cilium Assembly and Is Conserved in Ciliated Organisms.
Given that nearly all αK40 residues are acetylated in ciliary microtubules, and given the association between αTAT1 and the BBSome, we wished to determine the role of αTAT1 in cilium assembly. RPE-hTERT cells assemble a primary cilium when entering quiescence, and we found that αTAT1 depletion significantly delayed assembly of a primary cilia after serum starvation (Fig. 4A). We note that although cilium assembly was impaired in αTAT1-depleted cells 12h after serum withdrawal (Fig. 4 A and B and Fig. S3A), cilia were found in nearly equal numbers 24h after serum withdrawal in control or αTAT1-depleted cells (Fig. 4 A and C and Fig. S3B). Cilia assembled in αTAT1-depleted cells contained barely detectable levels of α-tubulin K40 acetylation (Fig. 4C and Fig. S3B). Thus, αTAT1 is responsible for α-tubulin K40 acetylation on cytoplasmic as well as ciliary microtubules and αTAT1 facilitates ciliary assembly.
We next examined the phylogenetic distribution of αTAT1. In a survey of 50 genomes of evolutionarily diverse organisms, we found that the presence of a αTAT1 ortholog correlates perfectly with the presence of a cilium or a flagellum (Fig. 4 D and E, Fig. S4, and Dataset S1). Most remarkably, when we examined the phylogenetic distribution of well-characterized cilia biogenesis factors, such as the BBSsome and the intraflagellar transport (IFT) complexes IFT-A and IFT-B, we found that none of their subunits were better correlated to the presence of a cilium than was αTAT1. Thus, αTAT1 appears to be the molecule whose presence best correlates with the existence of an axoneme.
αTAT Paralogs Are Required for α-Tubulin K40 Acetylation and Touch Sensation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Given the broad phylogenetic distribution of αTAT1, we set out to investigate the physiological roles of α-tubulin K40 acetylation using C. elegans. The C. elegans genome contains a single gene encoding an α-tubulin with a lysine at position 40, mec-12, and two genes encoding paralogs of αTAT1, mec-17 and W06B11.1, which we renamed atat-2. As previously reported (23), mec-17 is expressed exclusively in touch receptor neurons (Fig. 5A and Fig. S5A). atat-2 is expressed not only in touch receptor neurons but also in a subset of ciliated neurons, namely, PDE, ADE, CEP, and OLQ (Fig. 5A and Fig. S5B). Like the touch receptor neurons, CEP and OLQ are mechanoreceptor neurons activated by external point loads (24, 25). Thus, αK40 acetylation is a feature shared by some, but not all, mechanoreceptor neurons. The restricted expression of mec-17 and atat-2 implies that only 12 of 60 of the ciliated sensory neurons in C. elegans incorporate acetylated α-tubulin into their microtubules. This further suggests that, as in mammalian cells and Tetrahymena, α-tubulin K40 acetylation is dispensable for cilia formation.
Quantitative immunoblotting and immunofluorescence revealed that the levels of MEC-12 α-tubulin K40 acetylation were reduced in mec-17 and atat-2 null mutants, and reached undetectable levels in mec-17;atat-2 double null mutants and a mec-12 null mutant (Fig. 5 B–E and Fig. S5 C and D). Similar effects of the loss of mec-17, atat-2, and mec-12 on αK40Ac immunoreactivity were recently reported (15, 26). [MEC-12 is the sole C. elegans α-tubulin with a lysine at position 40 (5)]. Thus, the two αTAT1 paralogs appear to account for most, if not all, α-tubulin K40 acetylation in C. elegans. Robust α-tubulin K40 acetylation was detected in the TRNs and PVR, as reported previously (5, 27). The CEP and OLQ neurons also contain acetylated microtubules (Fig. 5C and Fig. S5C), but this modification was not detected in the ciliated chemosensory neurons in the head. TRNs lacking mec-17 or atat-2 have decreased levels of α-tubulin K40 acetylation, and loss of both genes reduces α-tubulin K40 acetylation to undetectable levels. α-Tubulin K40 acetylation in CEP or OLQ depends on atat-2, but is independent of mec-17 (Fig. 5D and Fig. S5D).
Consistent with the expression of atat-2, but not mec-17, in OLQ, nose touch sensation was significantly reduced in atat-2 and mec-17;atat-2 mutants but not in mec-17 single null mutants (Fig. 5F). The OLQ neurons act together with ASH and FLP to mediate avoidance of nose touch (28). Of these three ciliated mechanoreceptor neurons, only OLQ expresses an atat gene and contains acetylated α-tubulin (Fig. 5 A and D). Because CEP neurons are mechanoreceptors that mediate food-induced slowing (29), we measured the speed of atat-2 mutants off and on bacterial food. atat-2 mutants move more slowly off food than WT animals (0.14 ± 0.02 and 0.09 ± 0.01 mm/s in WT and atat-2 mutants, respectively), but retain the ability to slow when encountering a bacterial lawn. Thus, atat-2 has a role in locomotion, although the atat-2-expressing neurons responsible for this phenotype remain to be determined.
When we tested the body touch response that relies on TRN function, we found that mec-17 and atat-2 single mutants as well as mec-17;atat-2 mutants were partially touch insensitive or Mec (Fig. 5G). Consistent with the first report of a mec-17 missense allele (30), the morphology of TRNs was not dramatically altered in any of these mutants, as judged by imaging transgenic animals in which TRNs were labeled with GFP (Fig. S6). The Mec phenotype was more severe in mec-17 than in atat-2 mutants, but less severe than in the mec-12 mutant. The variation in the severity of the behavioral phenotype correlated with the level of αK40Ac immunoreactivity detected in the TRNs (Fig. S7). The mild phenotype of the double mutant that lacks α-tubulin K40 acetylation entirely suggests that although this posttranslational modification is important for touch sensitivity, it is not essential. We note that Akella et al. (15) reported that mec-17;atat-2 double mutants were more severely Mec. The discrepancy may reflect a difference in the preparation of the deletion mutants, which were outcrossed before use in the present study. Although it is not yet clear how loss of K40 acetylation disrupts touch sensation, it is unlikely to act by altering the growth or development of the TRNs.
To test whether the role of αTAT1 in touch sensation depends on its ability to acetylate MEC-12 α-tubulin at K40, we genetically manipulated both the enzyme and its substrate. Transgenic mec-17 mutants expressing MEC-17[+] were significantly more touch sensitive than those expressing the catalytically inactive MEC-17[D157N] (Fig. 5H). Similarly, mec-12 mutants expressing MEC-12[+] α-tubulin were significantly more touch sensitive than those expressing the nonacetylatable MEC-12[K40R] α-tubulin. We note that mec-17;MEC-17[+] and mec-12;MEC-12[+] transgenic animals were less touch sensitive than wild-type animals. We suspect that this is an artifact of overexpression of UNC-86::MEC-3 binding sites, as this manipulation is known to decrease expression of multiple genes critical for touch receptor neuron function (31). [The mec-17 promoter used to direct expression of all transgenic proteins to the TRNs contains two binding sites (23).] Nevertheless, these results indicate that acetylation of MEC-12 α-tubulin at K40 is required for full sensitivity to gentle touch, and suggest that artificial acetylation of MEC-12 α-tubulin should bypass the need for mec-17 and atat-2. We tested this idea by expressing the acetyl-mimic MEC-12[K40Q] α-tubulin, and found that this transgene was sufficient to partially restore touch sensation to mec-17;atat-2;mec-12 triple mutants (Fig. 5H).
Discussion
Using a combination of in vitro biochemistry and cell-based studies, we and others (15) have shown that αTAT1 (C6orf134) is a bona fide TAT. We additionally show that recombinant αTAT1 efficiently deposits acetyl groups on K40 of α-tubulin in vitro, that this activity is associated with the conserved GNAT-like domain and is abrogated in a αTAT1[D157N] mutant, and that αTAT1 is highly specific for tubulin over histones. Active αTAT1, but not catalytically dead αTAT1[D157N], is sufficient to produce acetylated microtubules in PtK2 cells which lack endogenous acetylated tubulin. TAT proteins are necessary for the production of acetylated tubulin in mammalian cells and C. elegans. Recent studies have suggested that Elp3 also functions as an αK40 TAT (8, 27). Although Elp3 may indirectly influence microtubule acetylation, we report that Elp3 fails to detectably acetylate microtubules in PtK2 cells. Because C. elegans TRNs retain acetylated microtubules and wild-type touch sensitivity in elpc-3 null mutants (27), Elp3 is unlikely to be a major contributor to microtubule acetylation in vivo. Thus, we propose that αTAT1 is the major, and possibly only, αK40 TAT.
Acetylation of α-Tubulin K40 by αTAT1 Inside the Microtubule Lumen.
The intralumenal location of αK40 poses a significant accessibility problem for αTAT1. An initial model proposes that αTAT1 (measured Stokes radius RS = 3.5 nm) enters the microtubule through the 14-nm diameter open ends, and is then restricted by unidimensional diffusion inside the lumen to reach its substrate. However, the nearly indistinguishable Km of αTAT1 for tubulin and microtubules strongly suggests that αK40 is freely accessible to αTAT1 in microtubules. How could αTAT1 possibly reach its intralumenal substrate in an unrestricted manner?
The small molecule taxol (RS = 0.8 nm) also binds to a site within the microtubule lumen. Surprisingly, taxol binding to microtubules is limited only by 3D diffusion and does not vary along the length of microtubules (32), thus implying that the taxol binding site is freely accessible. One idea is that taxol enters via 17-Å pores between protofilaments. Another is that lateral interactions between protofilaments are sufficiently weak to allow large openings to continuously appear and close in the microtubule wall (32). This microtubule “breathing” model is supported by cryo-electron microscopy observations of lattice defects and by the finding that microtubules rapidly change the number of their protofilaments in response to taxol binding (33). Because αTAT1 cannot enter through the 17-Å pores, it most likely accesses its substrate by entering through the transient lateral openings, and may therefore enable a quantitative study of microtubule breathing.
Somewhat surprisingly, the preference of αTAT1 for polymerized tubulin manifests itself in an increased kcat rather than a decreased Km. Because the immediate vicinity of K40 is resolved in the crystal structure of tubulin dimers (34) but not in the structure of microtubules (35), the K40 loop is likely more flexible and thus more prone to adopt a conformation optimal for catalysis in microtubules than in free tubulin. Beyond the preference of αTAT1 for microtubules vs. free tubulin, a major question relates to how αTAT1 might be directed to specific regions of a given microtubule within the cell. Indeed, α-tubulin K40Ac staining along cytoplasmic microtubules is often quite discontinuous (19) (Figs. 3E and 5 C and D), whereas tubulin detyrosination is seen all along the length of stable microtubules (36). Perhaps the acetylated regions are those that were bent the most and thus provided the greatest substrate accessibility to αTAT1 through increased breathing.
Acetylation of α-Tubulin K40 and Cilium Assembly.
In Chlamydomonas, Tetrahymena and C. elegans, α-tubulin K40 acetylation is dispensable for cilium or flagellum assembly. However, in mammalian cells, we find that the normal kinetics of cilium assembly require αTAT1. This is unlikely to be a consequence of siRNA off-target effects, as we confirmed these results using two independent siRNA duplexes. Likewise, we used two independent markers of cilia, polyglutamylated tubulin and Arl13b (Fig. 4B). Although it is conceivable that delays in the kinetics of flagellum assembly have been overlooked in previous experiments, it is equally likely that the assembly of mammalian primary cilia is more sensitive to the loss of α-tubulin K40 acetylation than in other organisms. Our results are also consistent with the findings that HDAC6 entry into cilia triggers cilium disassembly (37). A unique feature of mammalian primary cilia is their regulated emergence and resorption in quiescent vs. proliferating cells. Thus, an appealing hypothesis is that α-tubulin K40 acetylation of axonemal microtubules serves to couple the cycle of cilium emergence and resorption to the cell division cycle (38). Indeed, whereas most cells resorb their cilium in G1/S by shortening the axoneme, Ptk1 cells (which lack α-tubulin K40 acetylation) resorb their cilium in mitotic prophase by releasing the entire axoneme into the cytoplasm (39). Coupling cilium assembly to the cell cycle is likely important in neuroepithelial cells, which must respond to Hedgehog using their primary cilium while actively dividing. More generally, cilium assembly and resorption may be linked to oncogenic transformation and alteration in signaling responsiveness (40).
Acetylated Microtubules Are Essential for Normal Touch Sensation in C. elegans.
C. elegans hermaphrodites have 30 predicted mechanoreceptor neurons (41), and at least 14 of them express either mec-17 or atat-2. Thus, although acetylated tubulin is a common feature of mechanoreceptor neurons, it does not appear to be universal. For example, αTAT-2 expression and acetylated tubulin staining are found in OLQ but not ASH or FLP, but these sensory neurons mediate avoidance to nose touch in parallel (28).
The touch receptor neurons coexpress mec-17 and atat-2. Loss of one or both genes induces a partial defect in touch sensitivity. This defect can be partially restored by transgenic expression of MEC-17[+] but not catalytically dead MEC-17. Similarly, loss of MEC-12 induces a profound loss of touch sensitivity that can be partially restored by expression of MEC-12[+] but not an acetylation resistant MEC-12. The mild defect observed in mec-17; atat-2 double mutants was enhanced in a mec-12;mec-17;atat-2 triple mutant that lacks both αTAT activities and their α-tubulin substrate. Consistent with the idea that modified α-tubulin per se is required for touch sensation, the severe touch insensitivity of the triple mutant was partially restored by transgenic expression of MEC-12[K40Q], an α-tubulin allele that is predicted to mimic α-tubulin acetylated at K40.
In conclusion, the identification of αTAT1 as an αK40 TAT will enable further investigation of the physiology, biochemistry, and biophysics of α-tubulin K40 acetylation.
Materials and Methods
General Methods, Antibodies, DNA Constructs, and C. elegans Strains.
Recombinant protein expression and purification, microtubule purification, acetyltransferase assays, cell culture, immunofluorescence microscopy, siRNA-mediated αTAT1 depletion, phylogenetic analysis, generation of transgenic C. elegans strains, and C. elegans behavioral assays are described in SI Materials and Methods. Reagents used in this study are also described in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Julie Theriot, Aaron Straight, and Joanna Wysocka (Stanford University, Stanford, CA); Martin Gorowski (Rochester University, Rochester, NY); Alain Chariot and Laurent Ngyunen (Liège University, Wallonia, Belgium); Carsten Janke (Institut Curie, Orsay, France); Kenji Kontani (University of Tokyo, Tokyo) for reagents; Cen Gao for worm injection; and J. Fernando Bazan for uncovering the GNAT fold in C6orf134. Some nematode strains used in this work were provided by Martin Chalfie, Cornelia I. Bargmann, and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM089933 (to M.V.N.) and NS047715 and EB006745 (to M.B.G.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
See Commentary on page 21238.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1013728107/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Hammond JW, Cai D, Verhey KJ. Tubulin modifications and their cellular functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nogales E, Wolf SG, Downing KH. Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature. 1998;391:199–203. doi: 10.1038/34465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gaertig J, et al. Acetylation of lysine 40 in alpha-tubulin is not essential in Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:1301–1310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kozminski KG, Diener DR, Rosenbaum JL. High level expression of nonacetylatable alpha-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1993;25:158–170. doi: 10.1002/cm.970250205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fukushige T, et al. MEC-12, an alpha-tubulin required for touch sensitivity in C. elegans. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:395–403. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.3.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reed NA, et al. Microtubule acetylation promotes kinesin-1 binding and transport. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2166–2172. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cai D, McEwen DP, Martens JR, Meyhofer E, Verhey KJ. Single molecule imaging reveals differences in microtubule track selection between Kinesin motors. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Creppe C, et al. Elongator controls the migration and differentiation of cortical neurons through acetylation of alpha-tubulin. Cell. 2009;136:551–564. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ohkawa N, et al. N-acetyltransferase ARD1-NAT1 regulates neuronal dendritic development. Genes Cells. 2008;13:1171–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shen Q, et al. NAT10, a nucleolar protein, localizes to the midbody and regulates cytokinesis and acetylation of microtubules. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1653–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Loktev AV, et al. A BBSome subunit links ciliogenesis, microtubule stability, and acetylation. Dev Cell. 2008;15:854–865. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jin H, et al. The conserved Bardet-Biedl syndrome proteins assemble a coat that traffics membrane proteins to cilia. Cell. 2010;141:1208–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steczkiewicz K, Kinch L, Grishin NV, Rychlewski L, Ginalski K. Eukaryotic domain of unknown function DUF738 belongs to Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase superfamily. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:2927–2930. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.24.3572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.LeDizet M, Piperno G. Identification of an acetylation site of Chlamydomonas alpha-tubulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:5720–5724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akella JS, et al. MEC-17 is an alpha-tubulin acetyltransferase. Nature. 2010;467:218–222. doi: 10.1038/nature09324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choudhary C, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science. 2009;325:834–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1175371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marmorstein R, Trievel RC. Histone modifying enzymes: Structures, mechanisms, and specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1789:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.L'Hernault SW, Rosenbaum JL. Chlamydomonas alpha-tubulin is posttranslationally modified in the flagella during flagellar assembly. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:258–263. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Webster DR, Borisy GG. Microtubules are acetylated in domains that turn over slowly. J Cell Sci. 1989;92:57–65. doi: 10.1242/jcs.92.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hiller G, Weber K. Radioimmunoassay for tubulin: A quantitative comparison of the tubulin content of different established tissue culture cells and tissues. Cell. 1978;14:795–804. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Piperno G, LeDizet M, Chang XJ. Microtubules containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell Biol. 1987;104:289–302. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maruta H, Greer K, Rosenbaum JL. The acetylation of alpha-tubulin and its relationship to the assembly and disassembly of microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:571–579. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Y, et al. Identification of genes expressed in C. elegans touch receptor neurons. Nature. 2002;418:331–335. doi: 10.1038/nature00891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kang L, Gao J, Schafer WR, Xie Z, Xu XZ. C. elegans TRP family protein TRP-4 is a pore-forming subunit of a native mechanotransduction channel. Neuron. 2010;67:381–391. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kindt KS, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans TRPA-1 functions in mechanosensation. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:568–577. doi: 10.1038/nn1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bounoutas A, O'Hagan R, Chalfie M. The multipurpose 15-protofilament microtubules in C. elegans have specific roles in mechanosensation. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1362–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Solinger JA, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans Elongator complex regulates neuronal alpha-tubulin acetylation. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kaplan JM, Horvitz HR. A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:2227–2231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron. 2000;26:619–631. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81199-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chalfie M, Au M. Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. Science. 1989;243:1027–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.2646709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Toms N, Cooper J, Patchen B, Aamodt E. High copy arrays containing a sequence upstream of mec-3 alter cell migration and axonal morphology in C. elegans. BMC Dev Biol. 2001;1:2–17. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-1-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Díaz JF, Barasoain I, Andreu JM. Fast kinetics of Taxol binding to microtubules. Effects of solution variables and microtubule-associated proteins. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:8407–8419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211163200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Díaz JF, Valpuesta JM, Chacón P, Diakun G, Andreu JM. Changes in microtubule protofilament number induced by Taxol binding to an easily accessible site. Internal microtubule dynamics. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33803–33810. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gigant B, et al. The 4 A X-ray structure of a tubulin:stathmin-like domain complex. Cell. 2000;102:809–816. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nogales E, Whittaker M, Milligan RA, Downing KH. High-resolution model of the microtubule. Cell. 1999;96:79–88. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80961-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Geuens G, et al. Ultrastructural colocalization of tyrosinated and detyrosinated alpha-tubulin in interphase and mitotic cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:1883–1893. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pugacheva EN, Jablonski SA, Hartman TR, Henske EP, Golemis EA. HEF1-dependent Aurora A activation induces disassembly of the primary cilium. Cell. 2007;129:1351–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Seeley ES, Nachury MV. The perennial organelle: Assembly and disassembly of the primary cilium. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:511–518. doi: 10.1242/jcs.061093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jensen CG, Davison EA, Bowser SS, Rieder CL. Primary cilia cycle in PtK1 cells: Effects of colcemid and taxol on cilia formation and resorption. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;7:187–197. doi: 10.1002/cm.970070302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seeley ES, Carrière C, Goetze T, Longnecker DS, Korc M. Pancreatic cancer and precursor pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions are devoid of primary cilia. Cancer Res. 2009;69:422–430. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goodman MB, editor. Mechanosensation. WormBook. 2006. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. Available at http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Eddé B, et al. Posttranslational glutamylation of alpha-tubulin. Science. 1990;247:83–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1967194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carvalho-Santos Z, et al. Stepwise evolution of the centriole-assembly pathway. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1414–1426. doi: 10.1242/jcs.064931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.