Abstract
Integrin α4β7 mediates rolling and firm adhesion of leucocytes, two of the critical steps in leukocyte migration and tissue specific homing. Affinity of α4β7 for ligand is dynamically regulated by three interlinked metal ion-binding sites in β7-subunit I domain. In this study, we found that Phe185 (F185), a highly conserved aromatic residue in β7-subunit, links the specificity-determining loop and the synergistic metal ion-binding site (SyMBS) through cation-π interaction. Mutations of F185 that disrupted the SyMBS cation-F185 interaction led to deficient firm cell adhesion mediated by high affinity α4β7, and only slightly affected rolling adhesion mediated by low affinity α4β7. Disruption of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction induced partial extension of integrin ectodomain and separation of cytoplasmic tails, and impaired α4β7-mediated bidirectional signaling. In addition, loss of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction increased paxillin expression and promoted paxillin-integrin binding, leading to deficient cell spreading. Furthermore, integrin α4β7-mediated cell migration was decreased by the abolishment of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction. Thus, these findings reveal a cation-π interaction playing vital roles in the regulation of integrin affinity, signaling, and biological functions.
Integrins are a family of α/β heterodimeric cell adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell, cell-matrix, and cell-pathogen interactions. Different from most integrins that mediate only firm adhesion of cells upon activation, integrin α4β7 can mediate both rolling and firm adhesion of lymphocytes on its ligand mucosal addressing cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), which make it indispensable in the homing of lymphocytes to the intestine and gut-associated lymphoid tissues (1).
Cell adhesion through integrin is dependent on the dynamic regulation of integrin affinity. Affinity regulation is associated with the conformational rearrangement of the integrin molecule. Previous studies have shown that integrin extracellular domains exist in at least three distinct global conformational states: bent with a closed headpiece, extended with a closed headpiece, and extended with an open headpiece (2). The closed and open headpieces have low and high affinity for ligand, respectively. The equilibrium among these different states is regulated by integrin inside-out signaling and certain extracellular stimuli, such as divalent cations (3, 4). Compared to the low affinity state in Ca2+ + Mg2+, removal of Ca2+ strikingly increases ligand-binding affinity and adhesiveness of integrins (5). Crystal structures of integrin αVβ3 and αIIbβ3 revealed a unique interlinked linear array of three divalent cation-binding sites in integrin β I domain (6, 7). The central metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) is flanked by two metal ion-binding sites, the adjacent to MIDAS (ADMIDAS) and synergistic metal ion-binding site (SyMBS). The divalent cation at MIDAS directly coordinates the acidic side chain shared by all integrin ligands, and is essential for integrin-ligand binding (8–10). The SyMBS and ADMIDAS function as positive and negative regulatory sites, respectively (8, 9). The occupancy of SyMBS by divalent cation is required for integrin activation, whereas inhibition of integrin-ligand binding by Ca2+ is mediated by the ADMIDAS. Although the importance of SyMBS cation has been reported, the mechanism for its positive regulatory function has not been elucidated because hardly any conformational change was observed around the SyMBS upon integrin activation and ligand binding (6, 7).
Another important regulatory element for integrin-ligand binding is specificity-determining loop (SDL), a 20-30 residue segment located between β strands 2 and 3 in the β I domain (11). Mutations or deletion of SDL disrupted integrin-ligand binding (11, 12). Switching of a seven-residue sequence within the SDL of β1 integrin with the homologous sequence in β3 integrin leads to the alteration of ligand-binding specificity (13). Because SDL is a fairly flexible loop, orientation could be critical for its function. However, the mechanism of SDL orientation control remains elusive.
In this study, we found that SyMBS and SDL were linked by a cation-π interaction formed between SyMBS cation and F185 in integrin β7 subunit and that this interaction is essential for integrin affinity regulation and signaling. Disruption of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction impaired α4β7-MAdCAM-1 high affinity binding and induced global conformational change of α4β7 which induced abnormal intracellular signaling.
Results
A Cation-π Interaction Is Predicted to Link the SyMBS and SDL in Integrin β Subunit I Domain.
To investigate the regulatory element in integrin β7 subunit, integrin β3 I domain structure was chosen to serve as the structure model for the following reasons: (i) Integrin β I domain is highly conserved among different β subunits; for example, the sequence identities of β7 I domain to the structurally characterized β2 and β3 I domain are 66% and 53%, respectively (Fig. S1A); (ii) The β I domain structure is also highly conserved because the β3 and β2 I domain structures are almost identical as shown from superposition of β I domains from αIIbβ3 and αXβ2 (Fig. S1B) (14, 15); (iii) The crystal structures of integrin αIIbβ3 in both open and closed conformations have the highest resolution among currently available integrin structures, and have been widely used as a model for the study of other integrins (6, 8–10, 15). Thus, the integrin β3 I domain structure is an excellent model for β7 I domain.
F185, located at the base of SDL and adjacent to the SyMBS cation, is conserved as Phe or Tyr in all integrin β subunits except for β4 (Fig. 1A). The structure-based sequence alignment of αIIbβ3 and αXβ2 showed that all the residues in contact with F185 and SyMBS cation are identical among β7, β2, and β3 subunits (Fig. S1C). Based on the crystal structure of integrin αIIbβ3 (liganded-open conformation, pdb 2vdl) (15), the SyMBS cation is aligned on the center of the phenyl ring and the distances between them are within the range of cation-π interaction (< 6.0 Å) (16) (Fig. 1 B–D). Therefore, it is predicted that a cation-π interaction is formed between SyMBS cation and F185. Moreover, an axis drawn through the three metal ions is aligned with the phenyl ring (Fig. 1B).
The Aromatic Side Chain of F185 Is Essential for Integrin High Affinity Ligand Binding.
To test our hypothesis, F185 was mutated to Tyr (Y), Trp (W), His (H), or Ala (A) respectively to gradually weaken its ability of forming cation-π bond (17). Phe, Tyr, and Trp can form cation-π bonds with adjacent cations as they all have aromatic rings which are electron rich near their centers and poor around their peripheries. Phe and Tyr contribute similarly to the cation-π bond due to the identical size of their aromatic rings, whereas Trp has a substantially larger aromatic side chain and would require repacking of residues around it to form cation-π bond. Although His is also aromatic, it does not form a cation-π bond, because His has a different electrostatic distribution and the preferred site for interaction with a cation is on the edge of the ring opposite the unprotonated nitrogen atom (17). Substitution of Phe with Ala results in the complete removal of the aromatic group.
Adhesive behavior of α4β7 293T transient transfectants in shear flow was characterized in a parallel wall flow chamber by allowing them to adhere to MAdCAM-1 adsorbed to its lower wall. 293T cell line is used in this study because it does not express endogenous α4β7 integrin. The shear stress was incrementally increased and the velocity of the cells remaining bound at each increment was determined. Wild-type (WT) transfectants behaved as previously described for lymphoid cells expressing α4β7 (8). In 1 mM Ca2+ + 1 mM Mg2+, cells rolled with increasing velocity as shear stress was increased, reaching a velocity of about 8 μm/s at the wall shear stress of 16 dyn/cm2, and were mostly detached at 32 dyn/cm2 (Fig. 2A). By contrast, cells were firmly adherent in 1 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 2A). Rolling and firm adhesion represent low and high affinity interactions of α4β7 with MAdCAM-1, respectively. As control, cells transfected with the α4 cDNA alone, or α4β7 transfectants treated with the α4β7 blocking antibody Act-1 or EDTA did not accumulate on MAdCAM-1 substrates (Fig. 2A).
F185 substitutions had little impact on α4β7-mediated rolling adhesion of 293T transient transfectants in Ca2+ + Mg2+ (Fig. 2A). In contrast, weakening of the aromatic ring’s ability to form a cation-π bond significantly affected the firmly adhesive behavior of cells in Mg2+ (Fig. 2 A and B). Substitution of Phe by Tyr had no impact on firm adhesion, whereas substitution of Phe by Trp converted the firm adhesion of cells in Mg2+ to rolling adhesion. Retention of the aromatic side chain but abolition of ability to form a cation-π bond with His substitution, or mutation to Ala abolished α4β7-MAdCAM-1 binding in Mg2+ (Fig. 2 A and B). Next we tested the effect of F185 mutations on the strength of α4β7-mediated adhesion to MAdCAM-1 by examining the cell resistance to detachment. While resistance to detachment was similar in Ca2+ + Mg2+, in Mg2+ WT and F185Y were similarly resistant, and the F185W, F185H, and F185A mutants were increasingly susceptible (Fig. 2 C and D).
To further confirm that F185 is required for integrin high affinity ligand binding, we investigated the effect of F185 mutations on a highly activated α4β7 mutant (Q324T). Q324T mutation was reported to activate integrin by introducing a N-glycan at N322 in the β I/hybrid domain interface, which induces β7 hybrid domain swing-out (18). Consistently, F185W, F185H, and F185A mutations severely impaired the high affinity ligand binding of Q324T mutant in both ion conditions (Fig. 2E). Taken together, these data demonstrate that an aromatic side chain capable of forming a cation-π bond at residue 185 is essential for high affinity ligand binding.
F185 Functions Through Cation-π Interaction by Interacting with the SyMBS Cation.
To exclude the possibility that, instead of cation-π interaction, F185 performs its function by forming hydrophobic or charge-charge interactions with its nearby environment, F185 was mutated to Leu (L, hydrophobic residue) and Glu (E, negatively charged residue), respectively. The adhesive behavior of F185L and F185E 293T transient transfectants on MAdCAM-1 was similar to that of F185A transfectants (Fig. 3A), suggesting that the contribution of F185 to α4β7-MAdCAM-1 binding was not through hydrophobic or charge-charge interactions.
To confirm that F185 functions through its interaction with SyMBS cation, mutation abolishing cation binding at SyMBS was introduced into F185 mutants. Previous study on integrin α4β7 has shown that mutation of SyMBS-coordinating residue D237 stabilizes integrin in the low affinity state (8). If F185 functions through interacting with SyMBS cation, removal of SyMBS cation by mutation should eliminate the effects of F185 mutations. As predicted, F185 mutation to W, H, or A had no effect in the context of the D237A mutation (Fig. 3B). Moreover, removal of SyMBS cation by mutation rescued the cell adhesion of F185H and F185A mutants to a level similar to that of the SyMBS single mutant, suggesting the abolishment of ligand binding by F185H and F185A mutations is dependent on SyMBS cation. These results suggest that the regulatory function of F185 is dependent on the SyMBS cation, and support a cation-π bond.
The SyMBS Cation-F185 Interaction Is Essential for Coupling Integrin-Ligand Binding and Global Conformational Change.
We used FRET to examine the influence of F185 residue on integrin conformation. To assess the orientation of integrin α4β7 ectodomain relative to the plasma membrane, α4β7 was labeled with Alexa Fluor 488-Act-1 Fab fragment as donor which binds to the top of α4β7 β I domain (19). The plasma membrane was labeled with FM4-64 FX (FM) as acceptor (7). Binding of MAdCAM-1 to α4β7 did not influence Act-1 Fab binding (Fig. S2). Compared to WT, the FRET efficiency of F185A 293T transient transfectants was significantly lower when cells spread on poly-L-Lysine (PLL) (Fig. 4A), indicating that the ectodomain of α4β7 F185A mutant was more extended prior to ligand binding. Binding of MAdCAM-1 to α4β7 further decreased the FRET efficiency of both WT and F185A α4β7 expressing cells. In MAdCAM-1 and 0.5 mM Mn2+, FRET efficiency of WT and F185A transfectants was even lower, and similar (Fig. 4A), suggesting full extension of the α4β7 ectodomain.
The influence of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction on integrin cytoplasmic domain separation was assessed using 293T cells transiently expressing α4β7 with monomeric cyan fluorescent protein (mCFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (mYFP) fused to the C termini of α4- and β7- subunits respectively (20). These fusions do not affect integrin function (9, 20). F185A mutation induced partial separation of integrin cytoplasmic domains prior to and after MAdCAM-1 binding, and MAdCAM-1 plus 0.5 mM Mn2+ induced more separation of the α4β7 cytoplasmic tails (Fig. 4B), similar to the results of the extension FRET assay in Fig. 4A.
SyMBS Cation-F185 Interaction Is Required for Integrin α4β7-Mediated Inside-Out Signaling.
Talin is a cytoskeletal protein that binds to integrin β tail and activates integrin by inside-out signaling (21). To investigate the impact of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction on integrin-mediated inside-out signaling, talin-GFP was overexpressed in α4β7 293T transient transfectants (Fig. S3A). In Ca2+ + Mg2+, the percentage of firmly bound WT α4β7 transfectants to total bound cells was increased from 36% to 70% after cotransfection with talin-GFP, indicating the activation of integrin by talin (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the percentage of firmly bound F185W mutant transfectants was not increased by cotransfection with talin-GFP (Fig. 5A), suggesting impaired integrin-mediated inside-out signaling. Loss of cation-π interaction did not alter the binding of endogenous talin to α4β7 because a similar amount of talin was coimmunoprecipitated with WT and mutant α4β7 (Fig. S3B). Interestingly, talin cleavage was inhibited in F185 mutant transfectants (Fig. S3B).
To further confirm the impaired inside-out signaling, we tested integrin activation by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimuli in WT and F185W expressing 293T transient transfectants, which express ADP receptors P2Y1,2,4 (22). ADP and PMA were reported to induce integrin activation through inside-out signaling by activating phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (23, 24). Consistently, WT α4β7 but not F185W transfectants could be activated by ADP or PMA (Fig. 5B).
Loss of SyMBS Cation-F185 Interaction Blocks Integrin α4β7-Mediated Cell Spreading.
To assess the requirement of the cation-π interaction for integrin-mediated outside-in signaling, CHO-K1 cells stably expressing similar level of WT or mutant α4β7-GFP were established which showed similar adhesive behavior as 293T transfectants (Fig. S4 A and B), and α4β7-mediated cell spreading was studied (Fig. 5C). CHO-K1 transfectants were allowed to adhere on immobilized MAdCAM-1 for 2 h in F12 medium with Ca2+ + Mg2+, followed by fixation and microscopic analysis. WT α4β7 expressing cells spread substantially on MAdCAM-1 substrates. Interference-reflection microscopy (IRM) showed an irregular shape and extensive area of cell-substrate contact (Fig. 5C). In contrast, the F185W stable transfectants exhibited less spreading. F185H and F185A transfectants did not spread on MAdCAM-1; the area of contact with MAdCAM-1 was much smaller and largely remained round (Fig. 5C). Quantification of cell area from differential interference contrast (DIC) images showed F185H and F185A transfectants exhibited the same area of projection as cells in suspension (Fig. S4C). Moreover, these cells failed to form significant actin stress fibers in contrast to the robust stress fibers in WT transfectants (Fig. S4D). Thus, F185 mutation abrogates α4β7-mediated cell spreading, suggesting disrupted outside-in signaling.
Loss of SyMBS Cation-F185 Interaction Enhances Association of Integrin with Paxillin.
To address the question of how the loss of cation-π interaction affects integrin-mediated cell spreading, the association of integrin with paxillin was examined. Paxillin is a focal adhesion-associated adaptor protein important in the regulation of cell spreading and migration (25, 26). Compared to WT α4β7 CHO-K1 stable transfectants, paxillin expression was up-regulated and more paxillin was coimmunoprecipitated with α4β7 in F185 mutant transfectants (Fig. 5D). Quantitative real-time PCR and immuno-blot analysis demonstrated that the up-regulation of paxillin occurs at the transcription level in mutant transfectants (Fig. S5).
To confirm that the impaired cell spreading is due to enhanced paxillin-integrin binding, a point mutation (S988D) was introduced into integrin α4 subunit cytoplasmic domain that inhibits association with paxillin (26). As expected, S988D mutation restored the spreading of F185 mutant CHO-K1 stable transfectants to the same level as that of WT α4β7 expressing cells (Fig. 5E and Fig. S6A). The recovery was not due to the alteration of α4β7-MAdCAM-1 binding because the adhesive behavior of α4β7 expressing cells was not affected by S988D mutation (Fig. S6B). These findings demonstrate that loss of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction up-regulates paxillin expression, enhances the association of integrin with paxillin, and thus, results in deficient cell spreading.
Abolishment of SyMBS Cation-F185 Interaction Impairs α4β7 Integrin-Mediated Cell Migration.
Integrin-mediated cell adhesion and signaling play a fundamental role in cell migration (27). We investigated the role of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction on α4β7-mediated cell migration using α4β7 CHO-K1 stable transfectants. In contrast to 75% wound closure of WT α4β7 expressing cells, cells expressing F185A mutant showed only 19% wound closure after migrating on MAdCAM-1 for 9 h (Fig. 6A; Movies S1 and S2). Random cell migration of F185A transfectants was also reduced significantly with shorter migration traces compared to WT (Fig. 6B, Movies S3 and S4). The F185A expressing cells exhibited elongated cell shape and detachment at the trailing edge was retarded (Movies S3 and S4). Similar results were obtained from serum-induced transwell migration. Compared to WT, the number of F185A transfectants migrating to the lower chamber was decreased significantly (Fig. 6C). Thus, these results demonstrate that mutation of F185 impairs α4β7-mediated cell migration.
Discussion
The dynamic regulation of integrin affinity and signaling plays vital roles in cell spreading and migration. As metalloproteins, ligand binding of integrins is dependent on and regulated by divalent cations. Although previous studies have shown the importance of the SyMBS cation, the mechanism for its positive regulatory function remains elusive. On the other hand, SDL is a fairly flexible loop which is important for integrin-ligand binding, but how its orientation is controlled has not been elucidated. In this study, we revealed that a cation-π interaction links the SyMBS cation with F185 in the SDL and regulates α4β7 ligand binding and signaling.
The residue at the position of F185 in integrin β7 I domain is conserved as Phe or Tyr in all integrin β subunits except for β4, which is unusual in many respects. Different from other integrins that harbor short cytoplasmic domains of 40–70 amino acids, β4 contains a cytoplasmic domain of 1,088 amino acids, and interacts with intermediate filaments rather than the actin cytoskeleton (28). Hence, integrin β4 could have distinct mechanisms for affinity and signaling regulation.
Upon activation, integrin undergoes global and local conformational rearrangements to convert from a low affinity to high affinity state (2). The lack of SyMBS cation-F185 impairs high affinity adhesion and appears to disrupt the local conformational change of ligand-binding site required for high affinity integrin-ligand binding. Interestingly, mutations of SyMBS-coordinating residues also impaired integrin high affinity ligand binding (8), suggesting that this cation-π interaction may exert its role in stabilizing the high affinity state of integrins by modulating the electronic environment of the metal ions in the ligand-binding site. In addition, it is worthwhile to note that F185 locates at the base of SDL, which is a fairly flexible loop near the metal ion-binding sites. Therefore, the metal ions might regulate the conformation of SDL during integrin activation through this cation-π interaction.
Despite deficient activation of ligand binding by F185 mutations, loss of SyMBS cation-F185 interaction induces partial extension of integrin ectodomain and separation of cytoplasmic tails which are associated with integrin activation (Fig. 4 A and B). Previous structural and mutagenesis studies have shown the importance of the α1-helix, β6-α7 loop, and α7-helix in allosteric communication between the β I and hybrid domains (29–31). In the high affinity, liganded integrin conformation, the α1-helix straightens and moves laterally, displacing the β6-α7 loop and facilitating the downward displacement of the α7-helix that triggers hybrid domain swing-out and global conformational rearrangements (29). The interlinked SyMBS, MIDAS, and ADMIDAS comprise residues in the α1-helix and β6-α7 loop. Breaking SyMBS cation-F185 interaction could affect the interlinked metal ions cluster, and then induce the above conformational rearrangements. However, ligand binding can be dissociated from these rearrangements except those close to the ligand-binding site (9, 32). Our results suggest that F185 mutations prevent shift of MIDAS toward the high affinity configuration and, at the same time, release structural constraints on the β6-α7 loop and α7-helix that trigger global conformations similar to those in the high affinity state.
Another notable finding of our study is that the loss of cation-π interaction up-regulates paxillin expression at transcriptional level. Paxillin is a 68-kDa intracellular signaling adaptor protein that is involved in cellular responses to integrin-dependent adhesion and migration. Previous study has shown that paxillin expression can be up-regulated at the transcription level through growth factor receptor (GFR) activation, such as HER2/HER3 (33). As a common consequence of GFR activation, the activity of some tyrosine kinases, such as PI-3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), is increased, leading to phosphorylation and activation of transcription factors (34, 35). In our study, we have shown that F185 mutations induce partial extension of α4β7 and separation of its cytoplasmic tails, which are associated with integrin activation (20). These conformational changes might mimic integrin outside-in signaling and activate similar intracellular pathways in response to integrin activation, such as increase of PI3K and MAPK activity (36, 37).
Paxillin binding to the cytoplasmic domain of α4 integrins results in inhibition of cell spreading (25). Consistent with the decreased cell spreading, paxillin-α4β7 binding is increased in F185 mutant transfectants. The overexpression of paxillin can increase the paxillin binding to WT α4β7 and inhibit cell spreading (Fig. S6 C–E), suggesting the increase in paxillin expression alone is sufficient to increase paxillin binding to α4β7 and decrease cell spreading independent of F185 mutations. Thus, it is more likely that the increased binding of paxillin to F185 mutants is due to the increased paxillin protein level, but not the higher affinity of α4β7 mutant to paxillin.
Integrin-mediated cell migration requires the dynamic regulation of cell adhesion at the leading edge and de-adhesion at the trailing edge with the cooperation of multiple signaling pathways (38). Up-regulation of integrin adhesiveness in integrin α4β7 led to the elongation of cell shape, deficiency of cell retraction at the trailing edge, and inhibition of cell migration (39). Interestingly, down-regulation of integrin adhesiveness by F185 mutations resulted in a similar phenotype in our study (Fig. 6B, Movies S3 and S4). Therefore, integrin requires both low and high affinity ligand binding to support optimal cell migration. Besides the deficient cell adhesion, the loss of SyMBS cation-π interaction could generate defective intracellular signaling which up-regulates paxillin expression and leads to constitutively enhanced association of paxillin with α4β7. The effective cell migration requires the dynamic spatial regulation of α4 integrin-paxillin binding at the cell leading and trailing edges (26, 40). Either disrupting or enforcing the association of α4 with paxillin greatly impairs cell migration. Thus, the enhanced α4-paxillin association by F185 mutations could result in deficient cell migration. In addition, talin cleavage is decreased by F185 mutations which could slow focal adhesion (FA) turnover and lead to accumulation of mature FA (41). As expected, more mature FAs were observed in migrating F185 mutant expressing cells than in WT transfectants (Fig. S7), which could also contribute to the decreased cell migration.
Materials and Methods
cDNA Construction.
The β7 site-directed mutations were generated by using Quick-change (Stratagene). cDNA of human talin with N-terminal-fused green fluorescent protein (talin-GFP) in vector pEGFP-C1 was kindly provided by Minsoo Kim (University of Rochester Medical Center, USA). All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Flow Chamber Assay.
The flow chamber assay was performed as described (8). For the experiments of ADP and PMA stimulation, 10 μM ADP or 0.1 μM PMA (final concentration) were added and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min before cells were infused into the flow chamber.
FRET.
FRET was measured as described (7, 20). For detecting the orientation of integrin ectodomain relative to cell membrane, cells were incubated on indicated ligands for 30 min at 37 °C. 0.5 mM Mn2+ was added into medium to activate integrin. Adherent cells were fixed by 3.7% paraformaldehyde and then stained with 20 μg/mL Alexa Fluor 488-Act-1 Fab, followed by staining with 10 μM FM-4-64 FX (Invitrogen). For detecting the association of integrin cytoplasmic tails, α4-mCFP/β7-mYFP293T transient transfectants (106/mL) were treated as above and allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 2 h. Then cells were fixed and subjected to photobleach FRET imaging. FRET efficiency (E) was calculated as E = 1-(FCFP(d)Pre/FCFP(d)Post), where FCFP(d)Pre and FCFP(d)Post are the mean CFP emission intensity of Pre- and Post- photobleaching.
Cell Spreading and Microscopy.
Cell spreading was done as described (42). Cells were allowed to spread on human MAdCAM-1 fused to the Fc1, 2 region of human IgG1 (hMAdCAM-1/Fc) coated surface (10 μg/mL) for 2 h at 37 °C before fixation. For the quantification of cell spreading, outlines of 50 randomly selected adherent cells from each of three separate experiments were generated, and the number of pixels contained within each of these regions was measured by using Image-Pro® plus v6.0.
Wound-Healing Assay.
Cells were seeded on h-MAdCAM-1/Fc (10 μg/mL) coated glass coverslips in F12 medium with 0.5% (vol/vol) FBS until cells formed a confluent monolayer. Then the cell monolayer was wounded using a sterile P10 pipette tip. Image sequences were collected at 5 min interval on Leica DM IRE2 microscope with CoolSNAP™ HQ camera (Photometrics).
Single Cell Random Migration.
Cells were plated on h-MAdCAM-1/Fc (10 μg/mL) coated glass bottom dish in F12 medium with 0.5% FBS within a CO2 chamber at 37 °C. After 4 h, image sequences were collected every 5 min. Migration tracks were determined as tracks of cells that did not die, divide, or run out of the field of view during 9 h.
Serum-Induced Transwell Migration.
Both sides of transwell chambers (8 μm pore, Millipore) were coated with 10 μg/mL h-MAdCAM-1/Fc. Serum-starved CHO-K1 cells were added to the upper chamber and the lower chamber was filled with F12 medium with 10% FBS. After incubation at 37 °C for 4 h, cells migrating to the lower side were stained with 0.5% Crystal Violet (Sigma) and enumerated by microscopy.
Coimmunoprecipitation.
Cells were plated on h-MAdCAM-1/Fc (10 μg/mL) coated surface for 2 h before subjected to immunoprecipitation. Integrins were immunoprecipitated by α4β7 mAb Act-1. Mouse IgG was used as control. Talin, paxillin, and integrin β7 subunit were detected by antitalin (Sigma-Aldrich), antipaxillin and FIB27 mAbs (BD Biosciences), respectively.
Statistical Analysis.
All statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Student’s t test.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Dr. Minsoo Kim (University of Rochester Medical Center) for kindly providing talin-GFP and Dr. Gaoxiang Ge and Dr. Dangsheng Li for discussion. This work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health (NIH) (HLB-48675), Ministry of Science and Technology 973 project (2010CB529703), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700119, 30970604), Shanghai Pujiang Program (08PJ14106), Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-R-67), and Novo Nordisk-CAS Research Foundation (NN-CAS 2008-1).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1015487107/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Berlin C, et al. α4β7 integrin mediates lymphocyte binding to the mucosal vascular addressin MAdCAM-1. Cell. 1993;74:185–195. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90305-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Luo B-H, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:619–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arnaout MA, Mahalingam B, Xiong JP. Integrin structure, allostery, and bidirectional signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:381–410. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.090704.151217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mould AP, Akiyama SK, Humphries MJ. Regulation of integrin α5β1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26270–26277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.44.26270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leitinger B, McDowall A, Stanley P, Hogg N. The regulation of integrin function by Ca2+ Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1498:91–98. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(00)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu J, et al. Structure of a complete integrin ectodomain in a physiologic resting state and activation and deactivation by applied forces. Mol Cell. 2008;32:849–861. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xiong JP, et al. Crystal structure of the complete integrin αVβ3 ectodomain plus an α/β transmembrane fragment. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:589–600. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200905085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen JF, Salas A, Springer TA. Bistable regulation of integrin adhesiveness by a bipolar metal ion cluster. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:995–1001. doi: 10.1038/nsb1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen J, Yang W, Kim M, Carman CV, Springer TA. Regulation of outside-in signaling and affinity by the β2 I domain of integrin αLβ2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:13062–13067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605666103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valdramidou D, Humphries MJ, Mould AP. Distinct roles of β1 metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS), adjacent to MIDAS (ADMIDAS), and ligand-associated metal-binding site (LIMBS) cation-binding sites in ligand recognition by integrin α2β1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:32704–32714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802066200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takagi J, DeBottis DP, Erickson HP, Springer TA. The role of the specificity-determining loop of the integrin β subunit I-like domain in autonomous expression, association with the α subunit, and ligand binding. Biochemistry. 2002;41:4339–4347. doi: 10.1021/bi016047u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsuruta D, et al. Crucial role of the specificity-determining loop of the integrin β4 subunit in the binding of cells to laminin-5 and outside-in signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:38707–38714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301637200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takagi J, Kamata T, Meredith J, Puzon-McLaughlin W, Takada Y. Changing ligand specificities of αVβ1 and αVβ3 integrins by swapping a short diverse sequence of the β subunit. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:19794–19800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xie C, et al. Structure of an integrin with an α I domain, complement receptor type 4. Embo J. 2010;29:666–679. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Springer TA, Zhu J, Xiao T. Structural basis for distinctive recognition of fibrinogen γ C peptide by the platelet integrin αIIbβ3. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:791–800. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200801146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gallivan JP, Dougherty DA. Cation-π interactions in structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9459–9464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mecozzi S, West AP, Jr, Dougherty DA. Cation-π interactions in aromatics of biological and medicinal interest: electrostatic potential surfaces as a useful qualitative guide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:10566–10571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen JF, et al. The relative influence of metal ion binding sites in the I-like domain and the interface with the hybrid domain on rolling and firm adhesion by integrin α4β7. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55556–55561. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407773200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tidswell M, et al. Structure-function analysis of the integrin β7 subunit: identification of domains involved in adhesion to MAdCAM-1. J Immunol. 1997;159:1497–1505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim M, Carman CV, Springer TA. Bidirectional transmembrane signaling by cytoplasmic domain separation in integrins. Science. 2003;301:1720–1725. doi: 10.1126/science.1084174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tadokoro S, et al. Talin binding to integrin β tails: a final common step in integrin activation. Science. 2003;302:103–106. doi: 10.1126/science.1086652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischer W, Franke H, Groger-Arndt H, Illes P. Evidence for the existence of P2Y1,2,4 receptor subtypes in HEK-293 cells: reactivation of P2Y1 receptors after repetitive agonist application. N-S Arch Ex Path Ph. 2005;371:466–472. doi: 10.1007/s00210-005-1070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun DS, et al. PI3-kinase is essential for ADP-stimulated integrin αIIbβ3-mediated platelet calcium oscillation, implications for P2Y receptor pathways in integrin αIIbβ3-initiated signaling cross-talks. J Biomed Sci. 2005;12:937–948. doi: 10.1007/s11373-005-9016-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Butler B, Williams MP, Blystone SD. Ligand-dependent activation of integrin αVβ3. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:5264–5270. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206997200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu S, et al. Binding of paxillin to α4 integrins modifies integrin-dependent biological responses. Nature. 1999;402:676–681. doi: 10.1038/45264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Han J, Rose DM, Woodside DG, Goldfinger LE, Ginsberg MH. Integrin α4β1-dependent T cell migration requires both phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the α4 cytoplasmic domain to regulate the reversible binding of paxillin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:34845–34853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304691200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huttenlocher A, Ginsberg MH, Horwitz AF. Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:1551–1562. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.6.1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Merdek KD, Yang X, Taglienti CA, Shaw LM, Mercurio AM. Intrinsic signaling functions of the β4 integrin intracellular domain. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30322–30330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703156200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiao T, Takagi J, Wang J-h, Coller BS, Springer TA. Structural basis for allostery in integrins and binding of ligand-mimetic therapeutics to the platelet receptor for fibrinogen. Nature. 2004;432:59–67. doi: 10.1038/nature02976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mould AP, et al. Conformational changes in the integrin βA domain provide a mechanism for signal transduction via hybrid domain movement. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:17028–17035. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang W, Shimaoka M, Chen JF, Springer TA. Activation of integrin β subunit I-like domains by one-turn C-terminal α-helix deletions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2333–2338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307291101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiong JP, et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin αVβ3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science. 2002;296:151–155. doi: 10.1126/science.1069040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vadlamudi R, Adam L, Tseng B, Costa L, Kumar R. Transcriptional up-regulation of paxillin expression by heregulin in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2843–2846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Clark EA, Brugge JS. Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken. Science. 1995;268:233–239. doi: 10.1126/science.7716514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McCubrey JA, et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773:1263–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Scott MJ, Billiar TR. β2-integrin-induced p38 MAPK activation is a key mediator in the CD14/TLR4/MD2-dependent uptake of lipopolysaccharide by hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:29433–29446. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803905200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Armulik A, Velling T, Johansson S. The integrin β1 subunit transmembrane domain regulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Crk-associated substrate. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:2558–2567. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-09-0700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 1996;84:359–369. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81280-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Park EJ, et al. Aberrant activation of integrin α4β7 suppresses lymphocyte migration to the gut. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2526–2538. doi: 10.1172/JCI31570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goldfinger LE, Han J, Kiosses WB, Howe AK, Ginsberg MH. Spatial restriction of α4 integrin phosphorylation regulates lamellipodial stability and α4β7-dependent cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2003;162:731–741. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200304031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Franco SJ, et al. Calpain-mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:977–983. doi: 10.1038/ncb1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhu J, et al. Requirement of α and β subunit transmembrane helix separation for integrin outside-in signaling. Blood. 2007;110:2475–2483. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-080077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.