Abstract
Cardiorespiratory and blood gas alterations were evaluated in 6 healthy dogs that underwent a laparoscopic procedure using isoflurane anesthesia and carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum for 30 min. Heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, venous blood pH, partial pressure of CO2 and oxygen, oxygen saturation, total carbon dioxide (TCO2) and bicarbonate were monitored. Significant alterations were hypercapnia, hypoventilation, and respiratory acidosis.
Résumé
Altérations cardiorespiratoires et des gaz sanguins durant la chirurgie laparascopique pour l’insémination artificielle intra-utérine chez les chiens. Les altérations cardiorespiratoires et des gaz sanguins ont été évalués chez 6 chiens en santé qui ont subi une intervention laparascopique utilisant l’anesthésie par isoflurane avec un pneumopéritoine induit par du gaz carbonique (CO2) pendant 30 minutes. La fréquence cardiaque, la fréquence respiratoire, la température corporelle, le pH du sang veineux, la pression partielle de CO2 et d’oxygène, la saturation d’oxygène ainsi que le gaz carbonique total (TCO2) et le bicarbonate ont été surveillés. Des altérations importantes ont été l’hypercapnie, l’hypoventilation et l’acidose respiratoire.
(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières)
During laparoscopy, pneumoperitoneum is essential to provide a surgical field, allowing visibility and performance of surgical maneuvers (1). Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most commonly used gas for pneumoperitoneum. After its introduction into the peritoneal cavity, CO2 diffuses throughout the tissues and becomes balanced in all body compartments (2). Minimally invasive procedures, however, can cause cardiocirculatory and respiratory alterations due to hypertensive pneumoperitoneum, hypercapnia, and patient positioning.
The intra-abdominal pressure in the dog should not be greater than 10 to 12 mmHg (3) or increases in arterial blood pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, total peripheral resistance, and a decrease in cardiac output may occur (4). Hypercarbia may occur due to local CO2 absorption by the peritoneum and ventilatory restriction caused by abdominal distension. Hemodynamic alterations can be caused by the direct effect of CO2 on the cardiovascular system and indirectly through sympathetic stimulation. Tachycardia, arterial hypertension, and arrhythmias may also be observed (4).
This study evaluated cardiorespiratory alterations, venous blood gas alterations, and body temperature during pneumoperitoneum in bitches submitted to laparoscopy for intra-uterine artificial insemination. Six healthy mixed-breed adult bitches weighing 6 to 17 kg were used. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and body temperature (BT) were measured. pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), oxygen saturation (SatO2), total carbon dioxide (TCO2), and bicarbonate (HCO3−) were analyzed using venous blood collected from the jugular vein.
The animals were pre-medicated with acepromazine (Acepran; Univet, Campinas, Brazil), 0.05 mg/kg body weight (BW), IM, and pethidine (Dolosal; Cristália, Brazil), 3.0 mg/kg BW, IM. Anesthesia was induced with 1% propofol (Fresofol; Fresenius Kabi, Brazil), 5.0 mg/kg, IV, followed by orotracheal intubation and maintenance with isoflurane (Isothane; Baxter, Brazil) in a semi-closed circuit and spontaneous breathing. The animals were maintained in surgical anesthetic plane, which was controlled through clinical evaluation each 5 min; ocular and podal reflexes, jaw muscular tone and respiratory rate were monitored. Average isoflurane concentration was 2%. Pneumoperitoneum was created through a flux of 0.5 to 1.0 L of CO2/min to produce an intra-abdominal pressure of 8 to 10 mmHg (3). For the blood gas analysis (I-Stat Precision — EG-7; Abbott Laboratories, New Jersey, USA), 0.5-mL blood samples were collected before any anesthetic pre-medication (T0), after anesthesia was established (T1), after abdominal insufflation (T2), within 15 and 30 min (T3 and T4) of pneumoperitoneum, and 15 and 30 min (T5 and T6) after abdominal deflation. During the experimental period, laparoscopic artificial insemination was performed, a simple procedure that lasted approximately 15 min.
The study herein was conducted according to a randomized complete block design, and variables were subjected to Kolmorogov-Smirnov and Lilliefors normality tests. Blood HCO3− was analyzed with the Student Newman-Keuls (SNK) test. The non-normal variables (HR, RR, BT, pH, PCO2, TCO2, PO2, SatO2) had their normality and homoscedasticity adjusted by logarithmic transformation and were analyzed by the SNK test (PCO2, SatO2, and PO2). The non-parametric variables (HR, RR, BT, pH, and TCO2) were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Significant cardio-respiratory changes were detected during laparoscopy in the anesthetized dogs (Table 1). The values (mean + standard deviation) for TCO2 and HCO3− ranged from 24.8 ± 1.8 to 27.7 ± 2.7 and 23.5 ± 1.5 to 25.4 ± 2.0, respectively. There were no significant differences among T0 to T6 for TCO2 and HCO3. The observed changes may relate in part to general anesthesia, CO2 gas insufflation and high intra-abdominal pressure.
Table 1.
Mean ± standard deviation of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), body temperature (BT), and venous blood gas results: partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) and O2 (PO2), pH, and O2 saturation (SatO2) during CO2 pneumoperitoneum between time intervals (T) in 6 healthy dogs
| T | HR (bpm) | RR (brpm) | BT (°C) | PCO2 (mmHg) | PO2 (mmHg) | SatO2 (%) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 105.3 ± 14.5a | 56.5 ± 48.4a | 38.4 ± 0.5a | 41.9 ±6.6b | 42.0 ± 5.3b | 70.8 ± 10.5b | 7.37 ± 0.05a |
| T1 | 109.3 ± 18.7a | 12.0 ± 3.8a | 36.5 ± 0.4a | 45.6 ± 8.4b | 113.3 ±25.1a | 95.8 ± 3.8a | 7.32 ± 0.06a |
| T2 | 103.3 ± 9.8a | 8.8 ± 2.6a,b | 35.8 ± 0.3a | 60.0 ± 6.6a | 211.8 ± 138.2a | 96.5 ± 5.4a | 7.23 ± 0.04b |
| T3 | 97.7 ± 17.1a | 10.2 ± 3.4a,b | 35.8 ± 1.4a | 71.1 ± 19.4a | 141.5 ± 82.2a | 96.3 ± 3.0a | 7.16 ± 0.09b |
| T4 | 93.2 ± 13.3a | 12.3 ±5.4a | 34.7 ± 0.4a,b | 65.3 ± 23.2a | 189.2 ± 147.6a | 96.3 ± 3.9a | 7.20 ± 0.10b |
| T5 | 112.3 ± 40.1a | 30.0 ± 26.0a | 34.6 ± 0.4a,b | 49.1 ± 12.9b | 130.7 ± 139.7a,b | 77.0 ± 25.6a,b | 7.31 ± 0.07a |
| T6 | 115.8 ± 35.4a | 23.8 ±12.2a,c | 34.9 ± 0.6a,b | 43.9 ± 4.9b | 40.0 ± 11.8b | 73.3 ± 13.3a,b | 7.34 ± 0.05a |
T0 — before anesthetic premedication was given, T1 — time anesthesia was established, T2 — immediately after abdominal insufflation, T3 — within 15 min of pneumoperitoneum, T4 — within 30 min of pneumoperitoneum, T5 — 15 min after abdominal deflation. T6 — 30 min after abdominal deflation. bpm — beats per min, brpm — breaths per min.
Means with distinct superscripts within the column are significantly different (P < 0.05).
General anesthesia with isoflurane was used, as this is a safe choice that also allowed for administration of a high percentage of O2. Laparoscopic surgery has been reported using sedatives and regional anesthesia. However it is not possible to guarantee airway protection and some degree of respiratory depression and hypercapnia occured in humans (4), although it was not observed in dogs (1). General anesthesia with orotracheal intubation guarantees a greater control of ventilation, allowing for compensation of CO2 absorption that is induced by the pneumoperitoneum (4,5), and also results in adequate muscular relaxation and abdominal distention (4).
Gases such as CO2, nitrous oxide (N2O) (6), atmospheric air, oxygen (O2), nitrogen (N2), and helium (He) (7) can be used to produce pneumoperitoneum. Because CO2 is very soluble in blood, it is promptly absorbed by the peritoneum, causing hypercapnia and acidosis (4,8). However, it is by far the most used gas during laparoscopic procedures (8).
Hypertensive pneumoperitoneum leads to cranial dislocation of the diaphragm, reducing lung volume and compliance and increasing airway resistance. This causes reduced alveolar ventilation and impairs matching of ventilation and perfusion with consequent hypercapnia worsened by the peritoneal absorption of CO2, and by hypoxemia (4). The intra-abdominal pressure is of extreme importance to the physiopathology of hypercapnia, as it increases the absorption and reduces the elimination of CO2 (4,9). The intra-abdominal pressure of 8 to 10 mmHg used in this study was low in comparison to the pressure referred to by others (10), but it allowed adequate visualization and manipulation of abdominal viscera. Additionally, there was a significant increase in PCO2 during pneumoperitoneum, represented by T2, T3, and T4 with a maximum value within 15 min during T3. After abdominal deflation in T5, PCO2 returned to the normal value since CO2 is highly soluble, allowing for a fast diffusion of the gas throughout the blood and body tissues and its elimination by the lungs (11). Partial pressure carbon dioxide increases could also relate to abdominal distention, promoted by pneumoperitoneum, which reduces CO2 elimination by the lungs.
Acidosis was a consistent finding during abdominal insufflation with CO2. When comparing the means of venous blood pH intra-operatively and during the recovery from the anesthetic, there were significant differences in T2, T3, and T4 — the time when pneumoperitoneum was maintained. According to another study (9), discrete systemic acidosis is a clinically recognized side effect and acceptable during CO2 pneumoperitoneum. The peritoneum allows CO2 diffusion to tissues and absorption to the systemic circulation, leading to a decrease in plasma and peritoneal pH (9,12) through the liberation of hydrogen ions, according to the equation of CO2 dissociation:
Total carbon dioxide is a discrete variable that was within the normal range for this species. Total carbon dioxide represents both HCO3− and soluble CO2 (13), and is impacted by changes in metabolic activity. Although the venous blood gas evaluations of PO2 and SatO2 did not reflect the lungs oxygenating capacity, we observed increased PO2 and SatO2 in the venous blood during oxygen supplementation. An increase in PCO2 results in additional bicarbonate in extracellular fluid (4), and there was an increase in plasma bicarbonate during T2, T3, and T4, which occurred concomitantly with the decrease in pH, but was not significant.
The renal response to an increase of H+ concentration in a patient takes several hours or even days (13). During the pneuroperitoneum, the absorbed CO2 must be totally excreted by the lungs and hypercapnia must be controlled by maintaining adequate ventilation or an increase in tidal volume or rate. Other authors (4,9) have discussed the benefits of assisted or controlled ventilation as a method of preventing hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis during pneumoperitoneum. One must consider the consequences of hypercapnia and acidosis as compared with the increase in maximum respiratory and plateau pressures associated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation, which may cause pulmonary injury. Although positive-end expiratory pressure may improve gas exchange during pneumoperitoneum, this pressure, associated with the increased intra-abdominal pressure, increases intra-thoracic pressure reducing cardiac output. Considering the disadvantages of assisted ventilation, the present study was conducted using spontaneous breathing.
Tachycardia may occur as a compensatory response to decreased venous return (14), due to the increase in abdominal pressure or to the absorption of CO2; however, in the present study, the alterations in HR were not significant. Anesthesia can significantly reduce compensatory responses to decreased venous return as others have shown in a model of hypovolemia in isoflurane anesthetized dogs (15).
The respiratory rate (RR) showed large individual variations. There was a significant difference in means between the basal value (T0) compared with T2 and T3 as well as between T2 and T6. The decrease in RR observed in T1, T2, T3, and T4 may be related to the respiratory depression caused by the pre-anesthetic and anesthetic drugs (13). In this study, some tachypnea was expected in response to the hypercapnia or from the stimulus from increased abdominal pressure. However, the effect of the anesthetic agents on the central nervous system depresses the ventilatory response to CO2, blocking the compensatory physiological effect (11).
The BT measurements showed a significant difference between the basal value (T0) and T4, T5, and T6, which shows a progressive reduction. Although, there was no statistically significant difference in T1, T2, and T3, these values were below reference levels. Hypothermia during anesthesia was initiated at T1, probably due to acepromazine’s effect on the body’s temperature control centre and on vasodilation (13). The gradual reduction in body temperature, after induction of anesthesia, may be caused by an association of several factors, such as the hypotensive effect of propofol and isoflurane with consequent vasodilation from isoflurane, cool gas inhalation, abdominal insufflation with CO2, and the administration of intravenous fluids at room temperature.
Unfortunately this study did not document and standardize isoflurane percent as a means to ensure similar inhalant depressant effects among these dogs. Ideally, individual determinations of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preceeding this study could have enabled each dog to be stabilized at 1.2 MAC and thus be more likely to have similar respiratory and cardiovascular depression associated with isoflurane. The use of pre-medication could also result in varied responses among the dogs. The clinical approach used, however, may more closely relate to case management where premedication is used and anesthetic depth judged based on standard monitoring.
In conclusion, dogs undergoing pneumoperitoneum during a 30-minute period developed discrete hypercapnia, acidosis, and a compensatory elevation in blood bicarbonate. Hypothermia was also observed following premedication and worsened during the period of anesthesia. CVJ
Footnotes
Reprints will not be available from the authors.
Project approved by the Ethical Committee in Animal Experimentation (Comitê de Ética em Experimentação Animal — CETEA) of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, according to protocol 130/2006.
Use of this article is limited to a single copy for personal study. Anyone interested in obtaining reprints should contact the CVMA office (hbroughton@cvma-acmv.org) for additional copies or permission to use this material elsewhere.
References
- 1.Hewitt SA, Brisson BA, Sinclair MD, Sears WC. Comparison of cardiopulmonary responses during sedation with epidural and local anesthesia for laparoscopic-assisted jejunostomy feeding tube placement with cardiopulmonary responses during general anesthesia for laparoscopic-assisted or open surgical jejunostomy feeding tube placement in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2007;68:358–369. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.4.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Remedios AM, Ferguson J. Minimally invasive surgery: Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animals. The Compendium. 1996;18:1191–1199. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ishisaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimomura K, Abe H, Ohtomo Y, Idezuki Y. Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy surgery. Surgery. 1993;114:549–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Henny CP, Hofland J. Laparoscopic surgery: Pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1163–1171. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2250-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Botter FCS, Taha MO, Fagundes DJ, Fagundes ATN. The role of pneumoperitoneum in the respiratory and hemodynamic evaluation in anaesthetized rats, with or without intubation. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2005;32:261–266. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aksoy F, Belviranli M, Vatansev C, et al. A comparison of the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of extraperitoneal carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide insufflation. Am J Surg. 2001;182:486–490. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00743-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ritcher KP. Laparoscopy in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2001;31:707–727. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(01)50067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hazebroek EJ, Haitsma JJ, Lachmann B, et al. Impact of carbon dioxide and helium insufflation on cardiorespiratory function during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in an experimental rat model. Surg Endoscopy. 2002;16:1073–1078. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8248-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bergström M, Falk P, Park PO, Holmdahl L. Peritoneal and systemic pH during pneumoperitoneum with CO2 and helium in a pig model. Surg Endoscopy. 2007;22:359–364. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gebhardt H, Bautz A, Ross M, Loose P, Wulf H, Schaube H. Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum (CO2-PP) Surg Endoscopy. 1997;11:864–867. doi: 10.1007/s004649900473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robinson NE. Respiratory function. In: Cunningham JG, editor. Textbook of Veterinary Physiology. 2 ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997. pp. 569–577. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liem TK, Krishnamoorthy M, Applebaum H, Kolata R, Rudd RG, Chen W. A comparison of hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of abdominal insufflation with helium and carbon dioxide in young swine. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:297–300. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Grimm KA. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell; 2007. p. 1096. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Almeida AV, Ganem EM, Carraretto AR, Vianna PTG. Hemodynamic changes during pneumoperitoneum in volume and pressure controlled ventilated dogs. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003;53:756–766. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942003000600007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fayyaz S, Kerr CL, Dyson DH, Mirakhur KK. The cardiopulmonary effects of anesthetic induction with isoflurane, ketamine-diazepam or propofol-diazepam in the hypovolemic dog. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009;36:110–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
