Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2010 Dec 15;48(24):2575–2581. doi: 10.1002/polb.22132

Probing Interactions between Aggrecan and Mica Surface by the Atomic Force Microscopy

Preethi L Chandran 1,2,*, Emilios K Dimitriadis 2, Peter J Basser 1, Ferenc Horkay 1,*
PMCID: PMC3004364  NIHMSID: NIHMS228056  PMID: 22473175

Abstract

Aggrecan is a bottlebrush shaped macromolecule found in the extracellular matrix of cartilage. The negatively charged glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains attached to its protein backbone give aggrecan molecules a high charge density, which is essential for exerting high osmotic swelling pressure and resisting compression under external load. In solution aggrecan assemblies are insensitive to the presence of calcium ions, and show distinct osmotic pressure versus concentration regimes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of ionic environment on the structure of aggrecan molecules adsorbed onto well-controlled mica surfaces. The conformation of the aggrecan were visualized using Atomic Force Microscopy. On positively charged APS mica the GAG chains of the aggrecan molecules are distinguishable, and their average dimensions are practically unaffected by the presence of salt ions. With increasing aggrecan concentration they form clusters, and at higher concentrations they form a continuous monolayer of conforming molecules. On negatively charged mica, the extent of aggrecan adsorption varies with salt composition. Understanding aggrecan adsorption onto a charged surface provides insight into its interactions with bone and implant surfaces in the biological milieu.

Keywords: aggrecan, atomic force microscopy, adsorption, osmotic pressure

INTRODUCTION

Aggrecan is a bottlebrush shaped macromolecule found in the extra-cellular matrix of cartilage [15]. It consists of a linear protein core (220–250 kDa) with three globular domains (GD1, 2 and 3) along it (Fig. 1)[1]. Between GD2 and GD3, a number of negatively charged chains of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are attached to the protein core [4, 6, 7]. The Keratan Sulfate GAG chains are shorter (~15–20 nm), numbering up to 30–60 per aggrecan molecule, and have about 50 negative charges per chain [1, 6, 8]. The Chondroitin Sulfate GAG chains are longer (~20–60 nm), their number is about 100 per aggrecan molecule, and have up to 100 negative charges per chain [1, 68]. A two-dimensional representation of the aggrecan bottlebrush structure is shown in Figure 1, along with its typical dimensions. Aggrecan is usually polydisperse (1 5 × 106 Da), even when isolated from a single tissue source [7, 9]. There are variations in the length of the protein core between GD2 and GD3 domains, as well as in the number of the GAG chains [2, 4, 9]. In cartilage aggrecan/hyaluronic acid assemblies are enmeshed in a network of collagen fibers.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Two dimensional representation of the aggrecan molecule with typical dimensions reported in literature.

Aggrecan assemblies enable cartilage to bear compressive loads and absorb mechanical shock [8, 10, 11]. Aggrecan is negatively charged and in solution it exerts a large osmotic swelling pressure. The osmotic swelling pressure resists compressive loads on the tissue, and keeps the tissue hydrated [12, 13]. In the bottlebrush structure, the length of the GAG chains are within few multiples of their persistence length [10]. Due to the semi-rigid nature of the GAG chains as well as the electrostatic repulsion between them, the aggrecan bottlebrush itself has a large persistence length (~80–110 nm [7]). Under physiological conditions aggrecan assumes an extended conformation, which is critical for maintaining a large water fraction for the diffusion of nutrients [8], and effective damping of dynamic loads [10, 14, 15].

The osmotic pressure Π of aggrecan solutions exhibits different dependencies in different concentration regimes [11]. Below c ≈ 0.005 g/cm3, Π increases linearly with the aggrecan concentration. Linear dependence is typically observed in dilute polymer solutions, where the osmotic pressure is dominated by the kinetic mobility of the non-interacting particles. Between 0.005 g/cm3 and 0.015 g/cm3, Π displays a weaker than linear dependence on aggrecan concentration, which can be attributed to self-assembly among the aggrecan bottlebrushes. Above 0.015 g/cm3 Π follows a nearly quadratic dependence on the aggrecan concentration indicating that Π is dominated by binary monomer-monomer interactions.

Recent observations show that aggrecan assemblies in solution are insensitive to the presence of calcium ions [11]. Small-angle scattering measurements (SANS and SAXS) revealed that the structure of these systems is practically unaffected by changes in the ionic environment (ionic strength, counterion valence). The insensitivity to calcium ions is particularly important to the biological function of aggrecan [1619]. Osmotic pressure measurements show that the addition of CaCl2 reduces the osmotic pressure but does not influence the power-law behavior in each concentration regime. We found that (i) the concentration thresholds between these regimes are practically independent of the calcium content, and (ii) the shape of the Π vs c curves remains unchanged. Addition of 100 mM CaCl2 reduces the value of Π by a factor of approximately 2. The observed insensitivity of aggrecan assemblies to changes in the ionic environment is in sharp contrast to the behavior of typical linear synthetic and biological polyelectrolytes, such as polyacrylic acid or DNA, which precipitate in the presence of multivalent ions [11, 2023].

The first atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of aggrecan was published by Ortiz et al. [7] on positively charged APTES-mica. They investigated the nanomechanical properties of aggrecan by combining microcontact printing and atomic force microscopy [2430]. The lateral and compressive stiffness of end-grafted monolayers were estimated by probing the conformation and compressibility of aggrecan functionalized surfaces in aqueous salt solutions. Although these elegant measurements allow the determination of the interaction forces between the bottlebrushes, they do not yield direct information on the effect of salt on the adsorption and assembly of aggrecan molecules.

In this study we investigate the structure of adsorbed aggrecan molecules on charged model substrates under different salt conditions. Since in the physiological milieu aggrecan molecules are in contact with solid surfaces (e.g., bone, implants), a better understanding of the adsorption process may contribute to a more complete model of cartilage/skeletal metabolism. Adsorbed aggrecan molecules and their assemblies are imaged using AFM. Since aggrecan is negatively charged, it is expected that electrostatic interactions govern its adsorption characteristics. We compare aggrecan adsorption on positively charged APS-treated mica and negatively charged untreated mica. We investigate the effect of ions on the morphology of adsorbed aggrecan molecules, and determine the average size (height-width dimensions) of their GAG regions. We also identify changes in aggrecan adsorption patterns with increasing aggrecan concentration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aggrecan from bovine articular cartilage was obtained form Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). APS [1-(3-Aminopropyl) Silatrane] mica was prepared by coating freshly cleaved mica with 50 μl of 167 nM APS solution for 30 min, washing repeatedly, and drying in an Argon stream. The APS solution was prepared as described by Shlyakhtenko et al. [31]. The nominal surface charge density of untreated mica is 2 negative charges/nm2 [32]. APS mica is known to be weakly positive charged, but to our knowledge, there is no report on its surface charge density [31].

For the adsorption studies, a 7 μl drop of the aggrecan solution (c = 1 μg/ml, pH = 7) was placed on freshly cleaved mica or APS-mica for 3 minutes, then washed with ultra-pure, deionized water to remove salts, and dried in a gentle stream of argon. (In a separate experiment we found that 3 minutes adsorption time was sufficient to attain quasi-equilibrium.) To investigate the effect of salt we imaged aggrecan that was dissolved in (a) water, (b) 0.1 M NaCl, and (c) 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.002 M CaCl2. (0.002 M is the typical calcium ion concentration found in cells and extracellular matrix [33].) At the aggrecan concentrations used in this study, we estimated that a 0.002 M CaCl2 solution has at least 10 Calcium ions for each aggrecan negative charge. Since aggrecan from the salt-free aqueous solution adsorbs poorly on untreated mica, for this case only, samples were prepared by placing 3 μl aggrecan solution on the surface and allowing it to air dry without washing.

AFM imaging was performed in air in the tapping mode. Silicon cantilevers were used (OMCL by Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), which have a nominal spring constant of 42 N/nm, resonant frequency of 300 kHz, and nominal tip radius of 7 nm. Image processing was done using the Nanoscope Imaging software (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbara CA) and the NIH ImageJ software (available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). We report the height and width of the GAG region of adsorbed aggrecan molecules for the different salt solutions. We note that the height reported in this article is the maximum height along a selected cross-section of the molecule, subtracted from the average height of the substrate in the neighborhood. Figure 3 illustrates this procedure. For sampling consistency, all height and width measurements were performed along two cross-sections of each aggrecan bottlebrush, and was limited to molecules having core length > 100 nm in a 3 μm × 3 μm imaging area. We report the average and standard deviation of the measurements made on 40 to 80 adsorbed aggrecan molecules, for each salt condition. Statistical significance was measured using the student t-test.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Aggrecan (1 μg/ml) adsorption on untreated mica and APS-mica surfaces for different salt conditions. GAG chains are visible on APS mica and for the 0.1 M NaCl condition on mica. The globular domains are visible as bright spots along the protein core. Scan area: 1 × 1 μm2; scan frequency: 1.5 Hz, scale bar: 100 nm.

RESULTS

Adsorption of aggrecan on APS-mica and untreated mica

Figure 3 shows aggrecan adsorbed onto APS-mica and onto untreated mica from the three different salt solutions. On the positively charged APS-mica (Figure 3a–c), aggrecan adsorbs under all salt conditions, though the extent of adsorption is smaller from pure (salt-free) water, than from the salt solutions. The average number of aggrecan molecules adsorbed per μm2 from the three salt conditions are 4.5 (pure water), 9.6 (0.1 M NaCl) and 11.1 (0.1 M NaCl + 0.002 M CaCl2), respectively. There is a broad size distribution of the adsorbed molecules. For all salt conditions, aggrecan spreads out with visible GAG chains. The structure of the adsorbed aggrecan is qualitatively similar to that reported for positively-charged APTES mica in 0.1 M NaCl [7]. Distinct globular domains are clearly visible as bright spots along the aggrecan protein core (diameter ~ 15–25 nm, height ~ 0.9–1.5 nm). (We note that the surface of the APS-mica is hydrophobic as indicated by its wetting properties.)

On the negatively charged mica surface, however, the aggrecan adsorption varies for the different salt conditions (Fig. 3d–e). As mentioned earlier, aggrecan did not adsorb onto the plain mica surface from the salt-free solution. Therefore, the aggrecan droplet was air dried on the surface and imaged without prior rinsing. The aggrecan molecules dried on the surface do not show distinguishable GAG chains (Fig. 3d). Addition of 0.1 M NaCl makes the GAG chains distinguishable (see Fig. 3e), and this finding is comparable to that observed on APS mica despite the difference in charge and hydrophobicity between the two surfaces. However, when 0.002 M CaCl2 is added, the GAG chains are no longer distinguishable (Fig. 3f). The globular domains remain visible for all salt conditions. The adsorption of negatively charged aggrecan onto negatively charged mica can be attributed to specific interactions between the charged polymer chains and the surface. In addition, divalent counterions may neutralize the charge of both the aggrecan and the mica. However the detailed mechanism of the ion-exchange and adsorption processes is not fully understood.

Figures 4a and b show the average width and height of aggrecan molecules adsorbed on untreated and APS-mica surfaces under different salt conditions. Assuming that the adsorbed polymers have similar intrinsic variation in GAG chain length, the average width indicates how extended the GAG chains are on each surface. Furthermore, assuming similar GAG and core-protein widths for the adsorbed molecules, the imaged height reflects the degree of GAG extension (aggrecan molecules with well-spread and adsorbed GAG chains appear lower than with unextended GAG chains). On APS mica, no significant difference can be detected between the average widths of the aggrecan molecules adsorbed from different salt solutions (Fig. 4a). However, the height of the molecules on the APS mica surface adsorbed from salt-free solution appears significantly smaller than those adsorbed from salt solutions (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4b). In the case of the mica surface, there is no appreciable difference between the average height and width of aggrecan molecules adsorbed from 0.1 M NaCl with or without CaCl2. The dimensions of the adsorbed molecules in the presence of salt are similar to those measured on APS-mica surface. However aggrecan molecules dried on the mica surface from pure water exhibit significantly smaller width (p < 0.0001) and larger height (p < 0.0001) than molecules adsorbed from salt solutions, suggesting that the GAG chains are condensed on the protein core.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Width (a) and height (b) of aggrecan molecules adsorbed on untreated mica and APS-mica from different salt solutions.

Adsorption patterns with incremental aggrecan concentration

Since aggrecan molecules adsorb strongly onto APS mica, we study the effect of concentration on the adsorption patterns onto this substrate. Figures 5a–c show adsorbed aggrecan molecules from 0.1 M NaCl solutions and for aggrecan concentrations of 1.0, 1.25, and 2.5 μg/ml, respectively. At 1.0 μg/ml, the aggrecan molecules are well dispersed and adsorb as individual entities. At 1.25 μg/ml clusters and dispersed entities coexist. At higher concentration (c ≥ 2.5 μg/ml) aggrecan forms extended clusters and the entire surface is eventually covered by a monolayer of conforming polymers. It is notable that aggrecan in the presence of salts interacts strongly with the substrates but any interaction among aggrecan molecules is much weaker as indicated by the absence of aggrecan overlap. Figure 5d–f show that the adsorption patterns from aggrecan solutions containing 0.002 M CaCl2 are similar to those observed in the absence of calcium ions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Aggrecan adsorbed on APS-coated mica shows distinct adsorption patterns at different concentration regimes. At dilute concentrations (~1 μg/ml), the aggrecan molecules are well dispersed. At higher concentration (1.25 μg/ml) aggrecan forms clusters, which coexist with dispersed entities. At even higher concentrations (> 2.5 μg/ml), the clusters become larger, and eventually form a monolayer completely covering the substrate. Scan area: 3 × 1.5 μm2; scan frequency: 1.5 Hz. scale bar: 100 nm.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of aggrecan molecules adsorbed on charged surfaces, and the change in the adsorption pattern with increasing concentration has been investigated. The quantitative features of adsorbed molecules, such as the average height and width of their GAG regions, are compared under three different salt conditions: (a) pure water, (b) 0.1 M NaCl, (c) 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.002 M CaCl2.

On APS-mica in the absence of salt, aggrecan adsorbs with extended GAG chains indicating that the adsorption process is governed by attractive electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged GAGs and the positively charged surface. Adsorbed aggrecan molecules show at least four characteristic features. (1) The GAG side chains of molecules adsorbed from 0.1 M NaCl solution are distinguishable and extended on the surface. (2) The average height and width of the GAG chains do not change significantly in the presence of calcium ions. (3) Aggrecan adsorbed from 0.1 M NaCl displays distinct adsorption patterns with increasing concentration. Addition of CaCl2 does not affect the shape of the adsorption patterns. (4) With increasing surface concentration, aggrecan adsorption patterns gradually change from that of separate molecules to clusters of bottlebrushes, and then to a monolayer of densely packed conforming chains.

The variation oft the adsorption pattern shows similarities with concentration dependent changes of solution osmotic properties. At low concentration, the osmotic pressure of the aggrecan solution resembles that of dilute (non-interacting) polymers, i.e., the Π increases linearly with the aggrecan concentration. Correspondingly, aggrecan from dilute solutions (c < 1 μg/ml) adsorbs on the mica surface as individual entities (see Figure 5a). At higher concentration the osmotic pressure exhibits a weaker than linear concentration dependence indicating self-assembly among the aggrecan bottlebrushes. Correspondingly, aggrecan adsorbed in the intermediate concentration range (2.5 < c < 5 μg/ml) forms clusters as shown in Figs. 5b and c. The cluster formation can be attributed to the difference in water affinity between the globular domains of the protein core of the aggrecan molecule and the highly charged, hydrophilic polysaccharide bristles. In the semi-dilute concentration regime, Π is no longer due to the number of individual molecules but to the repulsion between each molecule and its nearest neighbor, and is thus approximately proportional to the square of the aggrecan concentration, i.e., π ∝ c2. Correspondingly, at aggrecan concentrations > 5 μg/ml the adsorbed clusters extend and form a continuous monolayer of conforming chains (Fig. 5d). The continuous line in Figure 6 illustrates the osmotic profile of aggrecan solutions with distinct change in the power-law behavior in the different concentration regimes [11]. For illustrative purposes, we show alongside the ‘surface equivalent’ of the aggrecan solutions (1.0, 2.5 and 10.0 μg/ml, respectively).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison between the changes in aggrecan adsorption patterns with increasing surface concentration and the concentration dependence of the osmotic pressure of aggrecan solutions [11]. The surface images for the dilute, self-assembly and concentrated states correspond to 1.0, 2.5 and 10.0 μg/ml, respectively, of adsorbing aggrecan in 0.1M NaCl solution. Scan area: 1.5 × 1.5 μm2; scan frequency: 1.5 Hz.

Aggrecan adsorption exhibits remarkable differences on untreated mica and APS-mica surfaces. Aggrecan from pure water do not absorb on untreated mica. When air-dried onto the surface, the GAG chains are indistinguishable. The average width of the bottlebrush is smaller, and its average height is larger than that of molecules adsorbed with extended GAG chains. In the case of adsorption from 0.1 M NaCl, however, the GAG chains become visible. In the presence of CaCl2 the average height and width of the molecules are similar to those on APS mica, but the GAG chains are not distinguishable by AFM.

The insensitivity of the morphology of adsorbed aggrecan assemblies to the ionic environment and the surface properties of the substrate allows aggrecan to act as an ion reservoir playing a critical role in cartilage/skeletal metabolism.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Measurement of height and width along a cross-section of the GAG region of an aggrecan molecule (a), using the Section Analysis feature of the Nanoscope Imaging Software. The plot (b) shows the height profile in nm along a black line drawn across the GAG region of the aggrecan bottlebrush in (a). The width is determined from the horizontal distance between two vertical lines (red) which demarcate the cross-section of the molecule and which correspond to the red arrows in (a). The maximum height along the selected cross-section is reported for the height of the molecule.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NICHD.

References

  • 1.Iozzo R, editor. Proteoglycans: Structure, Biology, and Molecular Interactions. Marcel Dekker Inc; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paulsson M, Morgelin M, Wiedemann H, Beardmore-Gray M, Dunham D, Hardingham T, Heinegard D, Timpl R, Engel J. Extended and globular protein domains in cartilage proteoglycans. Biochemical Journal. 1987;245(3):763–772. doi: 10.1042/bj2450763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eisenberg SR, Grodzinsky AJ. Swelling of articular cartilage and other connective tissues: Electromechanochemical forces. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1985;3(2):148–159. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100030204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dennis J, Carrino D, Schwartz N, Caplan A. Ultrastructural Characterization of Embryonic Chick Cartilage Proteoglycan Core Protein and the Mapping of a Monoclonal Antibody Epitope*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1990;265(20):12098–12103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watanabe H, Yamada Y, Kimata K. Roles of Aggrecan, a Large Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan, in Cartilage Structure and Function. J Biochem. 1998;124(4):687–693. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kiani C, Chen L, Wu YJ, Yee AJ, Yang BB. Structure and function of aggrecan. Cell Res. 2002;12(1):19–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ng L, Grodzinsky AJ, Patwari P, Sandy J, Plaas A, Ortiz C. Individual cartilage aggrecan macromolecules and their constituent glycosaminoglycans visualized via atomic force microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. 2003;143(3):242–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Comper WD, Laurent TC. Physiological function of connective tissue polysaccharides. Physiol Rev. 1978;58(1):255–315. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hascall VC, Sajdera SW. Physical Properties and Polydispersity of Proteoglycan from Bovine Nasal Cartilage. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1970;245(19):4920–4930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chandran P, Basser P, Horkay F. Aggrecan: an unusual polyelectrolyte, and its implications in physiology. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.011. in preparation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Horkay F, Basser PJ, Hecht A-M, Geissler E. Insensitivity to Salt of Assembly of a Rigid Biopolymer Aggrecan. Physical Review Letters. 2008;101(6):068301–068304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.068301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mow V, Holmes L, Lai W. Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: a review. J Biomech. 1984;17(5):377–394. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maroudas A. Proteoglycan Osmotic Pressure and the Collagen Tension in Normal, Osteoarthritic Human Cartilage. Osteoarthritis Symposium 1981 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comper W, Williams R. Hydrodynamics of Concentrated Proteoglycan Solutions. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1987;262(28):13464–13471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Comper W, Zamparo O. Hydrodynamic properties of connective tissue polysaccharides. Biochem J. 1990;269(3):561–564. doi: 10.1042/bj2690561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Poole AR, Matsui Y, Hinek A, Lee ER. Cartilage macromolecules and the calcification of cartilage matrix. The Anatomical Record. 1989;224(2):167–179. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092240207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blumenthal N, Posner A, Silverman L, Rosenberg L. Effect of proteoglycans on in vitro hydroxyapatite formation. Calcif Tissue Int. 1979;37(1):75–82. doi: 10.1007/BF02441164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Franzen A, Heinegard D, Reiland S, Olsson SE. Proteoglycans and calcification of cartilage in the femoral head epiphysis of the immature rat. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1982;64(4):558–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dziewiatkowski D, Majznerski L. Role of proteoglycans in endochondral ossification: inhibition of calcification. Calcif Tissue Int. 1985;37(5):560–564. doi: 10.1007/BF02557842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Horkay F, Tasaki I, Basser PJ. Effect of Monovalent-Divalent Cation Exchange on the Swelling of Polyacrylate Hydrogels in Physiological Salt Solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2000;2(1):195–199. doi: 10.1021/bm0056153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Horkay F, Tasaki I, Basser PJ. Osmotic Swelling of Polyacrylate Hydrogels in Physiological Salt Solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1(1):84–90. doi: 10.1021/bm9905031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Horkay F, Basser PJ. Osmotic Observations on Chemically Cross-Linked DNA Gels in Physiological Salt Solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2003;5(1):232–237. doi: 10.1021/bm034372m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arenzon JJ, Stilck JF, Levin Y. Simple model for attraction between like-charged polyions. Eur Phys J B. 1999;12(1):79–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dean D, Han L, Grodzinsky AJ, Ortiz C. Compressive nanomechanics of opposing aggrecan macromolecules. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;39(14):2555–2565. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dean D, Han L, Ortiz C, Grodzinsky AJ. Nanoscale Conformation and Compressibility of Cartilage Aggrecan Using Microcontact Printing and Atomic Force Microscopy. Macromolecules. 2005;38(10):4047–4049. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Han L, Dean D, Daher LA, Grodzinsky AJ, Ortiz C. Cartilage Aggrecan Can Undergo Self-Adhesion. Biophysical Journal. 2008;95(10):4862–4870. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.128389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Han L, Dean D, Mao P, Ortiz C, Grodzinsky AJ. Nanoscale Shear Deformation Mechanisms of Opposing Cartilage Aggrecan Macromolecules. Biophysical Journal. 2007;93(5):L23–L25. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Han L, Dean D, Oritz C, Grodzinsky A. Lateral Nanomechanics of Cartilage Aggrecan Macromolecules. Biophysical Journal. 2007;92(4):1384–1398. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.091397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seog J, Dean D, Plaas AHK, Wong-Palms S, Grodzinsky AJ, Ortiz C. Direct Measurement of Glycosaminoglycan Intermolecular Interactions via High-Resolution Force Spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 2002;35(14):5601–5615. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seog J, Dean D, Rolauffs B, Wu T, Genzer J, Plaas AHK, Grodzinsky AJ, Ortiz C. Nanomechanics of opposing glycosaminoglycan macromolecules. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;38(9):1789–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shlyakhtenko L, Gall A, Filonov A, Cerovac Z, Lushnikov A, Lyubchenko Y. Silatrane-based surface chemistry for immobilization of DNA, protein-DNA complexes and other biological materials. Ultramicroscopy. 2003;97(1–4):279–287. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hansma HG, Laney DE. DNA binding to mica correlates with cationic radius: Assay by atomic force microscopy. Biophysical Journal. 1996;70(4):1933–1939. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79757-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell Garland Science. New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES