Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1274–1280. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdfc47

Self-perception of weight and its association with weight-related behaviors in young reproductive-age women

Mahbubur Rahman 1, Abbey B Berenson 1
PMCID: PMC3005306  NIHMSID: NIHMS257037  PMID: 21099591

Abstract

Objectives

To examine weight misperceptions as well as their predictors and association with weight-related behaviors among low-income multiethnic reproductive-age women.

Methods

We assessed perceptions of body weight and weight-related behaviors of reproductive-age women (18–25 years old) attending one of five publicly funded reproductive clinics in Texas between August 2008 and March 2010. Data were collected through self administered questionnaires and chart review. Overweight and normal weight women were divided into four categories based on self-perception of their body weight: overweight misperceivers, overweight accurate perceivers, normal weight misperceivers, and normal weight accurate perceivers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the predictors of misperception and its association with weight-related behaviors.

Results

Twenty-three percent (267/1,162) of overweight and 16% (170/1,062) of normal-weight women were misperceivers. Overweight black women were more likely to consider themselves normal weight (28% compared with 15%; odds ratio [OR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–4.50), whereas normal-weight black women were less likely than whites to consider themselves overweight (7% compared with 16%; OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.22–0.74). Overweight women who had at least some college education (14% compared with 29%; OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32–0.86) and used the Internet (18% compared with 28%; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.31–0.70) were less likely to misperceive their body weight. Normal-weight misperceivers were more likely to report healthy and unhealthy weight-reduction behaviors compared with normal-weight accurate perceivers, after adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index. Opposite scenarios were observed for overweight misperceivers.

Conclusions

Weight misperception is common among both overweight and normal weight women of reproductive-age. Clinicians should provide patient-specific counseling related to healthy weight management goals that takes each patient’s perceptions into consideration.

Keywords: Reproductive-age women, self-perception, body mass index, overweight, weight-related behavior

Introduction

The prevalence of obesity in the US has more than doubled in the last three decades (1). More than two-thirds of US adults are currently overweight or obese while blacks and Hispanics are at high risk (2). The World Health Organization (WHO) labeled obesity as the most blatantly visible, but most neglected public-health problem worldwide (3).

Self-perception of body weight is the degree of concordance between perceived and measured weight. Accurate perception of body weight is very important for the success of obesity prevention programs. Furthermore, behavioral intervention programs of any kind are not successful unless an overweight person recognizes that he or she is overweight. Earlier studies have shown that the accuracy in weight perception has been associated with age, gender, race/ethnicity, BMI, income, education and lifestyle behaviors (411). However, data are lacking on reproductive-age women and the association of their weight perception with healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors.

Determining the extent of misperception of body weight is especially important in reproductive-age women as they are more likely to be obese than similarly aged men (12). Over one-half of reproductive-age women in the US currently have a BMI >25 kg/m2 (13), placing them at increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease at a young age. Minority women are at even higher risk, as an alarming 82% of Black and 75% of Mexican American women now meet the criteria for being overweight or obese. Moreover, reproductive-age women are prone to gain excess body weight during pregnancy and postpartum period (1417). Greater misperception of body weight in this group means less weight loss behavior which may make them more vulnerable to cardiovascular disease risk factors and other obesity related diseases. Furthermore, it has not been determined in what extent reproductive-age women are practicing unhealthy weight-related behaviors due to misperception of their body weight. The purpose of this study was to examine misperception of body weight and its association with healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors in a multiethnic reproductive-age women population.

Methods

We conducted a cross sectional survey on health behaviors among women 16–25 years of age attending one of five publicly funded reproductive health clinics between August 2008 and March 2010. Surveys were self-administered and those who agreed to participate were reimbursed $5 for their time. To assure that patients completed the survey only once during this 2 year interval, study personnel maintained a cumulative database containing the names of those who had previously completed the survey and compared it daily to the names of those appointed for a visit. Women who had previously completed the survey were not approached a second time. All procedures were approved by the institutional review board of the University of Texas Medical Branch.

This study focused on survey questions pertaining to sociodemographic variables, height, weight, weight perceptions, and weight-related behaviors among 18–25 years old participants. Age was calculated using years and months. Race and ethnicity were self-reported with choices including non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan native, native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, or other. No classification was available for mixed race. We restricted our analysis in this paper to non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women due to the limited sample size of other categories. Information about education level, marital status, work hours per week, and internet use were also obtained by self-report. Height and weight values were obtained from anthropomorphic data recorded in the medical chart. BMI was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by the square of the height (in meter). Women with a BMI<25 kg/m2 and ≥25 kg/m2 were considered as normal weight and overweight, respectively. Self-perception of weight was measured by asking, “How would you describe your weight?” Response options included “very underweight”, “slightly underweight”, “about the right weight”, “slightly overweight”, and “very overweight”. For analysis purpose these five response options were collapsed into two categories: (1) overweight (includes slightly overweight and very overweight) and (2) normal weight (includes very underweight, slightly underweight, and about the right weight). Using their calculated BMI and self-perception of weight, overweight and normal weight women were then divided into four categories: overweight misperceivers (overweight women who described themselves as underweight or normal weight), overweight accurate perceivers (overweight women who described themselves as overweight), normal weight misperceivers (normal weight women who described themselves as overweight), and normal weight accurate perceivers (normal weight women who described themselves as normal weight or underweight).

Eight questions were used to assess behaviors in the previous 30 days engaged in to lose weight or to keep from gaining weight. Behaviors assessed (yes or no) included, using diet pills, powder, or liquids, laxatives, diuretics, induced vomiting, skipping meals, eating less or differently, smoking more cigarettes and, not eating carbohydrates. Respondents were also asked about number of days they exercised or play sports for at least 30 minutes straight in the last week.

Statistical Analysis

Univariable comparisons were performed to compare the two groups (accurate perceivers vs. misperceivers in normal weight and overweight women) using the chi square test or Student t test, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify correlates of overweight misperceivers and normal weight misperceivers. Variables were screened for inclusion in an initial multivariable model. Candidate variables with P≤.20 were included in the initial multivariable model. Multivariable logistic regression was also used to compare weight-related behaviors of misperceivers with accurate perceivers, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and BMI. All analyses were performed using STATA 11 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

Of the 2224 women (18–25 years old) included in this study, 48.3% (n= 1076) were Hispanic (primarily Mexican or Mexican-American), 27.0% (n = 601) were white, 23.8% (n = 529) were African American, and 0.8% (n = 18) were from other racial/ethnic groups. The mean age of the sample was 21.4 years (SD = 2.1, range 18–25 years). Overall, 47.8% (1062/2224) of the women were normal weight (BMI<25 kg/m2) while 52.2% (1162/2224) were overweight or obese (BMI≥25 kg/m2). Tabulating self-perception of weight with actual weight status showed that 16% (170 of 1062) of normal weight women and 23.0% (267 of 1162) of overweight (36.8% of overweight and 10.5% of obese) women were misperceivers (Table 1).

Table 1.

Discrepancies between self-perception of weight and actual weight status

Self-perception of Weight Actual Weight Status

Normal weight (%) Overweight (%) Obese (%)
Underweight/normal weight 892 (84.0) 203 (36.8) 64 (10.5)
Overweight 170 (16.0) 348 (63.2) 547 (89.5)

Normal weight:BMI<25 kg/m2; Overweight: BMI: 25–29.9 kg/m2; Obese: BMI≥30 kg/m2

Bivariate analyses showed that the mean age was the same for overweight misperceivers and overweight accurate perceivers, but normal weight misperceivers were slightly older than normal weight accurate perceivers (Table 2). The mean BMI of overweight accurate perceivers and normal weight misperceivers were significantly higher than their counterparts. Significantly more Hispanic (24.7%) and black (28.2%) women were overweight misperceivers compared with white respondents (14.8%) while significantly more white (16.0%) and Hispanic women (19.7%) were normal weight misperceivers compared with black women (7.4%). Women who were internet users, had some college education, or employed >20 hours per week were less likely to be overweight misperceivers. Three correlates (BMI, race/ethnicity and education) which were significant in the bivariate analysis remained significant in multivariable logistic regression model while age, hours worked and internet use were not (Table 3)

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of the participants by weight perception

Characteristic Overweight Normal Weight

Accurate perceivers
(n=895)
Misperceivers
(n=267)
P Accurate perceivers
(n=892)
Misperceivers
(n=170)
P
Age, mean (±SD), years 21.7 (2.1) 21.4 (2.1) .150 21.2 (2.1) 21.5 (2.0) .035
Body mass index, (±SD), kg/m2 33.1 (6.5) 28.6 (3.7) <.001 21.2 (2.2) 23.2 (1.5) <.001
Race/ethnicity, (%) <.001 <.001
    White 241 (27.2) 42 (15.7) 267 (30.1) 51 (30.7)
    Black 206 (23.3) 81 (30.3) 224 (25.3) 18 (10.8)
    Hispanics 439 (49.6) 144 (53.9) 396 (44.6) 97 (58.4)
Marital status, (%) .849 .238
    Never married 460 (51.4) 139 (52.1) 521 (58.4) 91 (53.5)
    Living together/ever married 435 (48.6) 128 (47.9) 371 (41.6) 79 (46.5)
Education, (%) <.001 .422
    Did not complete HS 183 (20.7) 76 (29.5) 167 (19.0) 30 (18.0)
    Currently enrolled or HS graduate 382 (43.2) 131 (50.8) 440 (50.2) 77 (46.1)
    At least some college education 319 (36.1) 51 (19.8) 270 (30.8) 60 (35.9)
Household income, (%) .269 .207
    <30,000 716 (85.6) 207 (88.5) 680 (84.8) 134 (88.7)
    30,000 or more 120 (14.4) 27 (11.5) 122 (15.2) 17 (11.3)
Work (hours/week), (%) .011 .212
    Do not work 442 (49.6) 159 (60.0) 455 (51.3) 77 (45.6)
    ~20 83 (9.3) 18 (6.8) 97 (10.9) 16 (9.5)
    21 or more 366 (41.1) 88 (33.2) 335 (37.8) 76 (45.0)
Internet, (%) <.001 .882
    Do not use 169 (19.1) 98 (36.7) 177 (20.1) 35(20.6)
    Use 715 (80.9) 169 (63.3) 704 (79.9) 135 (79.4)

SD- Standard deviation; HS- High School

Table 3.

Correlates of normal weight and overweight misperceiversa

Characteristics Overweight Misperceivers Normal Weight Misperceivers

Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P
Age, yrs 0.95 (0.88–1.03) .230 1.05 (0.95–1.15) .322
Body mass index, kg/m2 0.81 (0.78–0.85) <.001 1.76 (1.56–1.98) <.001
Race/ethnicity
    White Reference Reference
    Black 2.84 (1.79–4.50) <.001 0.40 (0.22–0.74) .003
    Hispanics 1.25 (0.81–1.92) .313 1.13 (0.73–1.75) .575
Education
    Did not complete HS Reference Reference
    Currently enrolled or HS graduate 0.97 (0.65–1.46) .889 1.17 (0.69–2.00) .562
    At least some college education 0.53 (0.32–0.86) .011 1.28 (0.71–2.30) .416
Work (hours/week)
    Do not work Reference Reference
    ~20 0.61 (0.33–1.10) .100 0.98 (0.52–1.87) .957
    21 or more 0.83 (0.59–1.18) .309 1.32 (0.88–1.98) .178
Internet
    Do not use Reference Reference
    Use 0.47 (0.31–0.70) <.001 1.36 (0.79–2.34) .271
a

Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis

Bivariate analyses between self-perception of body weight and weight-related behaviors showed that the overweight misperceivers were significantly less likely to report most of the healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors than the overweight accurate perceivers (Table 4). However, the opposite scenario was observed for normal weight accurate perceivers. The multivariable logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity and BMI, showed the similar pattern (Table 5). Overweight misperceivers had significantly lower odds of dieting, skipping meals, and using diet pills/powders/liquids compared with their counterparts. On the other hand, normal weight misperceivers were significantly more likely than normal weight accurate perceivers to report both healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors. They were more than twice as likely to diet and skip meals, and smoke more cigarettes when compared with normal weight accurate perceivers. The respective odds were nearly 4 and 5 times with regard to using diet pills/powder/liquids and use of diuretics.

Table 4.

Weight related behaviors in misperceivers and accurate perceivers

Characteristics Overweight Women Normal Weight Women

Accurate perceivers
(n=895), %
Misperceivers
(n=267), %
P Accurate perceivers
(n=892), %
Misperceivers
(n=170), %
P
Healthy weight-related behavior
  Dieted (ate less or differently) in last 30 days 35.9 19.8 <.001 12.7 33.5 <.001
  Exercise or play sports for at least 30 minutes
    straight for at least 3 days in the last week
17.4 20.3 .280 20.1 16.0 .211
  Any healthy behavior 45.0 33.0 <.001 29.2 42.9 <.001
Unhealthy weight-related behavior
  Skipped meals in last 30 days 28.2 14.0 <.001 13.9 27.1 <.001
  Stopped eating carbohydrates in last 30 days 4.0 2.3 .257 1.7 2.4 .528
  Used diet pills, powders, or liquids 12.5 8.0 .043 2.1 9.4 <.001
  Vomiting or laxative use 4.7 3.0 .302 2.1 1.2 .557
  Use of diuretics 1.8 2.7 .450 0.5 2.4 .027
  Smoked more cigarettes 8.7 3.4 .005 6.1 11.9 .007
  Any unhealthy behavior 40.2 23.6 <.001 19.2 35.9 <.001

After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity and body mass index

Table 5.

Weight related behaviors: odds ratios of misperceivers Versus accurate perceivers

Characteristics Overweight Women Normal Weight Women

Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P
Healthy weight-related behavior
  Dieted (ate less or differently) in last 30 days 0.45 (0.32–0.64) <.001 2.32 (1.5–3.5) <.001
  Exercise or play sports for at least 30 minutes
    straight for at least 3 days in the last week
1.33 (0.92–1.92) .131 0.76 (0.48–1.22) .260
  Any healthy behavior 0.61 (0.45–0.83) <.001 1.50 (1.04–2.16) .028
Unhealthy weight-related behavior
  Skipped meals in last 30 days 0.45 (0.30–0.67) <.001 2.17 (1.41–3.35) <.001
  Stopped eating carbohydrates in last 30 days 0.70 (0.28–1.76) .449 0.92 (0.28–2.99) .894
  Used diet pills, powders, or liquids 0.59 (0.36–0.99) .046 3.68 (1.72–7.85) .001
  Vomiting or laxative use 0.55 (0.25–1.23) .148 0.28 (0.04–2.19) .224
  Use of diuretics 2.05 (0.76–5.50) .154 5.08 (1.09–23.66) .039
  Smoked more cigarettes 0.49 (0.23–1.02) .056 2.36 (1.28–4.34) .006
  Any unhealthy behavior 0.51 (0.37–0.71) <.001 2.22 (1.50–3.28) <.001

After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity and body mass index

Discussion

We observed that a large number (23%) of overweight and normal weight (16%) reproductive-age women do not accurately perceive their BMI category. Our finding that nearly one in 4 overweight reproductive-age women misperceives their body weight is consistent with those of other population-based large studies that have examined this among adult women (4,5). Furthermore, our observations that underassessment of body weight was more common in blacks and in women with lower education levels and overassessment of body weight was more common in white and Hispanic women are consistent with other published reports (4,5,7). Together, these studies provide evidence that misperception of body weight is very common in adult women. This report adds to the literature the observation that among reproductive-age women, both overweight accurate perceivers and normal weight misperceivers frequently participate in both healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors.

Underassessment of body weight is very common among both adolescent/adult men and women (47, 911,18,19). As reproductive-age women are more susceptible to gain weight than similar aged men, interventional programs should emphasize the consequences of underassessment of body weight and health risk associated with excess body weight. Overassessment of body weight is also common and well-documented (4). One notable finding in this study is, among reproductive-age women, normal weight misperceivers had significantly higher odds of reporting several unhealthy weight-related behaviors (i.e. diet pills/liquids/powder, diuretics, and smoking more cigarettes) which is a real concern. These sorts of behaviors have been found to be associated with adverse physical, psychological and nutritional outcomes, and disordered eating (2026). Weight gain over time, increase in depressive symptoms, inadequate nutritional intake, bulimia and anorexia were reported to be higher in individuals with unhealthy weight-related behaviors. This finding may give clinicians a point of discussion when counseling reproductive-age women about obesity and weight loss issues. As a prevention program, clinicians should routinely inquire about unhealthy weight-related behaviors and counsel them appropriately.

Weight misperception is a threat to the success of obesity prevention program. The Health Belief Model (HBM) offers some potential explanation for the mechanisms underlying self-perception and behavior change to avoid obesity. The model is based on six components: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The first component is related to weight perception. If overweight individuals do not perceive that they are overweight, other components of the HBM would not work for them. In an earlier study in reproductive-age women, we observed that even perceived weight gain was not enough to increase weight loss behavior (27). It could be due to the fact that even after weight gain, they do not assume themselves as overweight. Thus, the first prerequisite of the success of obesity prevention program is that the target group needs to recognize themselves as overweight. Addressing misperception should be the first step for the obesity prevention ladder.

Our finding that weight misperception is a determinant of healthy and unhealthy weight-related behaviors has several implications. First, lower likelihood of overweight misperceivers to practice healthy weight loss behavior than overweight accurate perceivers seems to have negative impact on obesity prevention program. Second, higher likelihood of normal weight misperceivers to practice four of the six unhealthy weight loss behaviors is a matter of concern. More than one-thirds of normal weight misperceivers had at least one unhealthy weight-related behavior is a public health threat as these behaviors have medical and psychological consequences (2026). This double-edged problem of weight misperception needs to be addressed by appropriate awareness programs from health care providers as well as from the media.

The strength of our study includes use of actual height and weight to calculate BMI-based weight status as several studies have observed that BMI based on self-reported height and weight are underestimated (28,29). This study has several limitations. We examined misperception of weight in 18–25 years old women, so we do not know whether similar findings would be observed in older reproductive-age women. In addition, we used BMI to categorize overweight and normal weight. As BMI does not distinguish between lean mass and fat mass, we may have misclassified some women who were more muscular.

In conclusion, we observed that misperception of weight and unhealthy weight –related behaviors are common in reproductive-age women. Clinicians should provide patient-specific counseling to reproductive-age women based on the presence of misperception of weight and unhealthy weight-related behaviors. Efforts to educate them about accurate weight status, and safe and effective weight loss strategies are essential. Obesity-related consequence of misperception and dangers of unhealthy weight-related practices should be highlighted specifically.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a K24 grant awarded to ABB (K24HD043659). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None

References

  • 1.Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States---gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:6–28. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–241. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series. 2000;894:1–252. [PubMed]
  • 4.Kuchler F, Variyam JN. Mistakes were made: Misperception as a barrier to reducing overweight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:856–861. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dorsey RR, Eberhardt MS, Ogden CL. Racial/ethnic differences in weight perception. Obesity. 2009;17:790–795. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gregory CO, Blanck HM, Gillespie C, Maynard LM, Serdula MK. Health perceptions and demographic characteristics associated with underassessment of body weight. Obesity. 2008;16:979–986. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson DA, Ryan DH, Bray GA. Sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and BMI in relation to self-perception of overweight. Obes Res. 2002;10:345–350. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Donath SM. Who’s overweight? Comparison of the medical definition and community views. Med J Aust. 2000;172:375–377. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb124010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller EC, Schulz MR, Bibeau DL, Galka AM, Spann LI, Martin LB, et al. Factors associated with misperception of weight in the stroke belt. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:323–328. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0499-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Truesdale KP, Stevens J. Do the obese know they are obese? N C Med J. 2008;69:188–194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.White MA, Masheb RM, Burke-Martindale C, Rothschild B, Grilo CM. Accuracy of self-reported weight among bariatric surgery candidates: The influence of race and weight cycling. Obesity. 2007;15:2761–2768. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults,1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–2850. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–1555. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:245–252. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02125-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Linne Y, Dye L, Barkeling B, Rossner S. Long-term weight development in women: a 15-year follow-up of the effects of pregnancy. Obes Res. 2004;12:1166–1178. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gunderson EP, Murtaugh MA, Lewis CE, Quesenberry CP, West DS, Sidney S. Excess gains in weight and waist circumference associated with childbearing: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:525–535. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Williamson DF, Kahn HS, Remington PL, Anda RF. The 10-year incidence of overweight and major weight gain in U.S. adults. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:665–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones M, Grilo CM, Masheb RM, White MA. Psychological and behavioral correlates of excess weight: Misperception of obese status among persons with Class II obesity. Int J Eat Disord. 2009 Aug 28; doi: 10.1002/eat.20746. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Edwards NM, Pettingell S, Borowsky IW. Where perception meets reality: self-perception of weight in overweight adolescents. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e452–e458. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stice E, Bearman SK. Body-image and eating disturbances prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms in adolescent girls: a growth curve analysis. Dev Psychol. 2001;37:597–607. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stice E, Burton EM, Shaw H. Prospective relations between bulimic pathology, depression, and substance abuse: unpacking comorbidity in adolescent girls. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:62–71. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Guo J, Story M, Haines J, Eisenberg M. Obesity, disordered eating, and eating disorders in a longitudinal study of adolescents: how do dieters fare five years later? J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:559–568. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Story M, Perry CL. Weight control behaviors among adolescent girls and boys: implications for dietary intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:913–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stice E, Presnell K, Shaw H, Rohde P. Psychological and behavioral risk factors for obesity onset in adolescent girls: a prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:195–202. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, French DA. Covariations of unhealthy weight loss behaviors and other high-risk behaviors among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:304–308. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170280074014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sciacca JP, Melby CL, Hyner GC, Brown AC, Femea PL. Body mass index and perceived weight status in young adults. J Community Health. 1991;16:159–168. doi: 10.1007/BF01323974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Le YL, Rahman M, Berenson AB. Perceived weight gain as a correlate of physical activity and energy intake among White, Black, and Hispanic reproductive-aged women. J Women Health. 2010 doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1776. (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Taylor AW, Dal Grande E, Gill TK, et al. How valid are self-reported height and weight? A comparison between CATI self-report and clinic measurements using a large cohort study. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2006;30:238–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00864.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gillum RF, Sempos CT. Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination. Survey. Nutr J. 2005;4:27. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES