Abstract
Escherichia coli spheroplast protein y (EcSpy) is a small periplasmic protein that is homologous with CpxP, an inhibitor of the extracytoplasmic stress reponse. Stress conditions such as spheroplast formation induce the expression of Spy via the Cpx or the Bae two-component systems in E. coli, though the function of Spy is unknown. Here, we report the crystal structure of EcSpy, which reveals a long kinked hairpin-like structure of four α-helices that form an antiparallel dimer. The dimer contains a curved oval shape with a highly positively charged concave surface that may function as a ligand binding site. Sequence analysis reveals that Spy is highly conserved over the Enterobacteriaceae family. Notably, three conserved regions that contain identical residues and two LTxxQ motifs are placed at the horizontal end of the dimer structure, stablizing the overall fold. CpxP also contains the conserved sequence motifs and has a predicted secondary structure similar to Spy, suggesting that Spy and CpxP likely share the same fold.
Keywords: Spy, spheroplast, extracytoplasmic stress response, Cpx, crystal structure
Introduction
Extracytoplasmic stress response (ESR) systems play an important role in coping with envelope stress by regulating gene expression in response to stress signals. In Escherichia coli, three ESR systems are well known: the sigmaE proteolytic cascade, and the conjugation plasmid expression (Cpx) and the bacterial adaptive response (Bae) two-component systems.1–7 Each ESR system is activated by distinct triggers such as unfolded proteins and metal ions. ESR systems tranduce signals to the cytoplasmic space across the inner membrane and regulate the expression of target genes. Although ESR systems independently regulate target genes, their regulons are partially overlapping.
The overexpression of Spy (Spheroplast protein y) is regulated by ESR systems. When a bacterial cell wall is stripped off, which is referred to as the spheroplast formation, Spy is overexpressed by both the Cpx8 and the Bae two-component systems in E. coli.9 However, it is not detected in normal cells.8 In addition to spheroplast formation, other stimuli also activate the expression of Spy. Copper ions lead to Spy expression via the Cpx pathway,10 whereas zinc ions cause its expression via the Bae pathway.11 Tannin12 and indole13 enhance Spy transcription through the Bae pathway. The activation of the Rcs two- component system is also reported to enhance the expression of Spy.14 These data indicate various triggers induce the overexpression of Spy via either separation or simultaneous activation of ESR systems.
Though the triggers and signaling pathways leading to Spy expression have been well studied, the function of Spy is unknown. The spy-deletion mutant possesses no defect under both normal growth conditions and conditions of stress.8,9 However, a clue comes from the observation that Spy shares the identity of 25.5% with CpxP, which is a member of the Cpx two-component system. CpxP functions as a negative regulator of the Cpx two-component system and is a stress sensor of the Cpx pathway,3,15 implying that the function of Spy might be related to the ESR system.
To gain insights into the function of Spy, we have determined its crystal structure. We find that E. coli Spy (EcSpy) has a unique fold with a long kinked hairpin-like structure of four α-helices and forms a dimer. In the EcSpy dimer, the four helices are arranged in an antiparallel orientation that results in a curved oval shape with a highly positively charged concave surface that may function as a ligand binding site. The residues on the dimeric interface are highly conserved among Spy proteins of enterobacteria as well as CpxP, suggesting that Spy and CpxP have similar structures.
Results and Discussion
Overall structure of EcSpy
The mature form of EcSpy, composed of residues 24–161, was expressed as a recombinant protein and purified by Ni-chelating resin and gel filtration. The crystal of selenomethionine-labeled EcSpy belongs to the hexagonal P6222 space group and diffracted to 3.0 Å resolution. The phases were determined by the multiwavelength anomalous dispersion method (Table I). The native crystal of EcSpy diffracted to 2.7 Å resolution. Instead of the P6222 space group, the native data were scaled in the P32 space group, containing four monomers in an asymmetric unit [Fig. 1(A)]. The final model was refined with the R and Rfree of 25.2 and 30.0%, respectively (Table I). It contains residues 53–143 for each monomer, 22 cadmium ions, and 90 water molecules. Most of the cadmium ions are involved in crystal contacts except four, which interact with His119 of each monomer. Residues that were not observed in the electron density map due to disorder include N-terminal residues 24–52 and C-terminal residues 144–161 [Fig. 3(C)].
Table I.
Data collection statistics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAD data (PAL BL 4A) |
|||||
Data set | Native data (ALS 8.3.1) | Peak | Edge | Remote 1 | Remote 2 |
Space group | P32 | P6222 | |||
Unit cell (Å) | a = 69.20, c = 126.35 | a = 69.50, c = 128.48 | |||
Resolution (Å) | 20.0–2.70 (2.80–2.70)a | 50.0–3.0 (3.11–3.00) | |||
Wavelength (Å) | 1.11587 | 0.97944 | 0.97976 | 0.98771 | 0.97220 |
Total/unique reflections | 75029/18354 | 160659/4145 | 159089/4092 | 157808/4064 | 161819/4139 |
Completeness (%) | 98.3 (95.3) | 99.8 (100.0) | 99.8 (100.0) | 99.7 (100.0) | 99.8 (100.0) |
I/σ (I) | 25.4 (2.1) | 59.6 (8.0) | 60.5 (9.8) | 62.8 (13.4) | 59.6 (8.6) |
Rmerge (%) | 5.4 (38.5) | 10.8 (41.1) | 10.0 (35.8) | 9.2 (29.0) | 11.5 (40.1) |
Refinement statistics | |||||
Resolution (Å) | 20.0–2.7 (2.77–2.70) | ||||
No. of reflections | 17348 (1252) | ||||
Rwork/Rfree | 0.252/0.300 (0.318/0.354) | ||||
No. of atoms protein/cadmium ion/water | 3016/22/90 | ||||
RMSD Bond lengths (Å)/Bond angles (°) | 0.007/1.116 | ||||
Ramachandran statistics (%)b | 85.3/14.4/0.3 |
The highest resolution shell is shown in parenthesis.
Ramachandran statistics indicate the fraction of residues in the favored, allowed, and disallowed regions of the Ramachandran diagram.
The structures of the four monomers observed in the asymmetric unit are almost identical [Fig. 1(A)]. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of main chain atoms for pairs of monomers fall between 0.866 Å (RMSD between chain A and C) and 1.095 Å (RMSD between chain C and D). Chain A is used as the EcSpy monomer for the following analysis and figures.
The monomer structure consists of four α-helices exhibiting a long and kinked hairpin-like conformation [H1–H4, Fig. 1(B)]. H1 and H2 and the longest helix H3 form two prongs that are connected via a hairpin-loop between H2 and H3 [Fig. 1(B)]. H3 is kinked with a bend-angle of 135° at Lys107. The loop between H1 and H2 also introduces a bend that makes an interhelical angle of 105° between H2 and H3. The C-terminal helix, H4, and the N-terminal loop are curved inward [Fig. 1(B)].
To gain insight into the function of EcSpy, the structure was searched against the Protein Data Bank using the DaliLite server.16 However, no homologous structures were found. The top scoring structures were helical regions of larger proteins or a part of helical bundles that only marginally resembled Spy (Supporting Information Figure 1). Therefore, the structure of EcSpy is unique, and there are no homologous structures that can give information about the function of EcSpy.
Dimer structure of EcSpy
Because four monomers have a close contact in the asymmetric unit, the oligomeric state of EcSpy in solution was tested by crosslinking and by SEC-MALLS, which revealed that EcSpy exists as a dimer (Supporting Information Figure 2). We calculated the buried surface areas and the theoretical solvation free energies of the probable dimer interfaces to deduce the correct dimer structure (Supporting Information Table I). The dimer interfaces between chain A and C and chain B and D are strong enough to form the stable dimer: the buried surface area of larger than 1400 Å2 and the theoretical solvation free energy of less than −23 kcal/mol, an order of magnitude less than that predicted by the other interfaces (Supporting Information Table 1). Therefore, we suggest that the dimer of chain A and C (or equivalently chain B and D) is the stable dimer. Accordingly, the dimer structure of EcSpy chain A and C is referred to as the EcSpy dimer in the following discussion.
In the EcSpy dimer, chain A interacts with chain C in an antiparallel manner. The hairpin-loop and the nearby region (H2 and N-terminus of H3) in chain A is placed in proximity with the C-terminus of H3 and H4 in chain C and visa versa [Fig. 2(A)]. The EcSpy dimer has a rather flat and concave oval shape [Fig. 2(A,D)], reminiscent of a ligand receptor.
The dimer interface contains residues that form hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge. The NE2 atom of His88 and the O atom of Thr92 on H2 in chain A make hydrogen bonds with the O atom of Asn139 and the OH atom of Tyr127 in chain C, respectively [Fig. 2(B)]. The O atom of Ser93 on the hairpin-loop in chain A forms a hydrogen bond with the ND2 atom of Asn128 in chain C, whereas the OD1 atom of Asp94 on the hairpin-loop in chain A forms a salt bridge with the NZ atom of Lys135 in chain C [Fig. 2(B)]. The ND2 atom of Asn124 and the ND2 atom of Asn128 on the C-terminus of H3 in chain A also form hydrogen bonds with the O atom of Ile90 and the O atom of Ser93 in chain C, respectively [Fig. 2(C)].
EcSpy is a basic protein with a calculated pI of 9.45. It has 20 negatively charged residues (Asp and Glu) and 25 positively charged residues (Arg and Lys) of 137 amino acid residues. To observe their distribution, the electrostatic surface potential of the EcSpy dimer was visualized. The concave surface (inside) of EcSpy dimer structure is extremely positive, whereas the convex surface (outside) is a mixture of positive and negative charged regions as well as hydrophobic regions [Fig. 2(D)]. The extremely basic concave surface is ideally configured to bind negatively charged biomolecules, for example, lipopolysaccharides or phospholipids; a structural prediction that should be tested in future studies. Interestingly, two reported structures, MtCsoR and human Arfaptin, form a homodimer of helix bundles, which is similar to the structure of EcSpy.17,18 Although the functional analogy between Spy and those proteins is hard to address, they provide an example that Spy-like structures bind ligands.
Conserved residues and LTxxQ motifs
Fifteen homologs of EcSpy were identified, including uncharacterized proteins of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Multiple sequence alignment revealed 15 residues that are identical across this family (Supporting Information Figure 3). Their distributions are divided into three conserved regions [Fig. 3(A)]. Region 1 (Phe52, Leu57, Thr58, and Gln61) is distributed over the N-terminus and H1. Phe52 is not modeled in the structure. Region 2 (His88, Phe96, and Asp97) is located in H2 and within the hairpin-loop. Region 3 comprises eight identical residues (Asn124, Tyr127, Asn128, Leu130, Thr131, Gln134, Lys135, and Asn139), which are placed over H3 to H4 [Fig. 3(B,C)]. On right of the dimer structure [Fig. 3(A)], Region 2 of chain C and Regions 1 and 3 of chain A are placed in parallel forming a cluster of residues that are close in space [Fig. 3(B)]. Four of ten residues making a hydrogen bond or a salt bridge in the dimer belong to these conserved residues: His88, Asn124, Tyr127, and Asn128 [Figs. 2(B,C) and 3(C)].
Both Regions 1 and 3 of EcSpy contain the LTxxQ motif, which is also found in CpxP [Fig. 3(C); where x can be any amino acid]. This motif (repeated twice) is found in the Spy and CpxP proteins of many bacterial species, as well as in multiple unannotated CpxP-homologs having less than 200 amino acids. The variable residues of the LTxxQ motif in Regions 1 and 3 form a pattern that is conserved in aligned homologs. The LTxxQ motif in Region 1 has an acidic amino acid (Asp or Glu) and Ala for the third and the fourth residues, whereas Region 3 has Pro and Glu (Supporting Information Figure 3). It is intriguing that both LTxxQ motifs are placed together at the very end of the dimer [Fig. 3(B)]. Though the role of LTxxQ motif is not understood, it is known that the mutations in the fifth Gln residue of LTxxQ motif in EcCpxP reduce the protein stability and induce the DegP-dependent degradation of EcCpxP.2 These observations suggested that the LTxxQ motif seems to be important for maintaining the folding of CpxP and Spy. Taken together, the amino acid similarity suggests that the structure and the dimeric interface of EcSpy are very well conserved in the Spy and CpxP proteins of enterobacteria.
CpxP is a well-known homolog of Spy, and its sequence also exhibits characteristics that are shown in EcSpy. The predicted α-helical region in EcCpxP matches the secondary structure of EcSpy [Fig. 3(C)]. In addition, EcCpxP retains 13 of the 15 residues that are conserved in the multiple sequence alignment of Spy homologs, and three of them are involved in the dimerization: His82 (His88), Asn118 (Asn124), and Tyr121 (Tyr127), where the number in parenthesis indicates the residue number of EcSpy [Fig. 3(C)]. The LTxxQ motif, which is likely to be critical for maintaining the structure, is also nearly identical in EcCpxP and EcSpy [Fig. 3(C)]. Accordingly, EcCpxP is predicted to have helical structure similar to the EcSpy structure and to form a dimer in the same antiparallel manner.
In summary, we have determined the crystal structure of EcSpy. It has a long and kinked hairpin-like conformation, which is not represented in the structural database. Spy forms a stable dimer of interlocked antiparallel helical hairpins that generate a concave oval shape. The LTxxQ motif and interfacial residues are conserved in Spy homologs of enterobacteria and help maintain structural integrity. These same residues are conserved in CpxP, a negative regulator of Cpx signaling. Additionally, we suggest that the positively charged concave surface of Spy may serve as a ligand binding site, possibly engaging lipopolysaccharides or phopholipids Therefore, the Spy fold may be used for ligand recognition and modulation of ESR in multiple contexts across enterobacteria. Our structural studies will help to guide further biochemical and genetic experiments designed to identify the ligands of Spy and CpxP and their role in stress responses.
Materials and Methods
Cloning and purification
The mature form of EcSpy (24–161) was cloned into the modified pET28a(+) vector to have His-Trx tag before the thrombin cutting site. The plasmid was transformed into BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen). The protein expression was inoculated in Luria Bertani medium and cultured at 37°C. When the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.5–0.6, cells were induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside. Induced cells were cultured at 30°C for 5 h and harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended with buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.1M NaCl, and 5% glycerol), disrupted by sonication, and fractionated by centrifugation. Clarified lysate was loaded onto a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare), and the protein was eluted by an imidazole gradient. The fractions containing HisTrx-EcSpy were pooled and dialyzed against buffer A. The dialyzed sample was treated with thrombin (Roche), and the cleaved His-Trx tag was removed by flowing over a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare). The sample was finally purified using a HiLoad Superdex75 16/60 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare). The selenomethionine-substituted protein was expressed in B834(DE3) cell with M9 minimal medium in the presence of selenomethionine and purified by same procedure as native protein.
Crystallization and structure determination
The EcSpy was crystallized using the modified microbatch method at 22°C. One microliter of protein solution (60 mg/mL) was mixed with 1 μL of crystallization reagent containing 0.1M acetate pH 4.6, 26–32% (w/v) PEG400, 0.2M CdCl2, and 2 mM TCEP under a layer of Al's oil (Hampton research). The crystals were fully grown in a month and flash-frozen in a cold nitrogen stream. The X-ray diffraction data of native EcSpy were collected to a 2.7 Å resolution at ALS BL8.3.1 (Advanced Light Source Beamline 8.3.1). Mutiwavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) data were collected to a 3.0 Å resolution with ADSC Quantum 210 CCD detector at PLS BL4A (Pohang Light Source Beamline4A, South Korea). Native and four wavelength MAD (peak, inflection, two remotes) data were processed and integrated using HKL2000 and scaled using SCALEPACK.19 The native and MAD data were processed to the space group P32 and P6222 with nearly same unit cell parameters, respectively.
Seven selenium sites were found out of a total of 11 selenomethionine residues and used for phase calculation in the SOLVE program. Electron density was generated by RESOLVE after density modification.20,21 Because the electron density was too poor to trace automatically, the initial model was manually built using COOT,22 based on seven selenium sites and the secondary structure prediction. There is a monomer in the asymmetric unit of the P6222 space group. To improve the model, several cycles of rigid-body refinement, positional refinement, restrained refinement, simulated annealing, B-factor refinement, and model rebuilding were performed at 3.0 Å resolution using CCP4,23 Refmac,24 CNS,25 and COOT22 programs.
There are four monomers in an asymmetric unit of the native data in the P32 space group. The orientations of four monomers were searched using the Phaser program.26 The model was further built and refined using the diffraction data of native Spy. The final refinement was performed by Refmac24 with translation-libration-screw restraint. NCS (noncrystallographic symmetry) restraint was released to reduce R factor during final round of refinement. It resulted in the R and Rfree of 25.2 and 30.0%, respectively. The quality of the structure was analyzed with PROCHECK.27 The data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table I. Figures were generated using PyMOL.28
Sequence and structure analysis
The protein sequence alignment of EcSpy and EcCpxP was performed using ClustalW2.29 The secondary structure predictions were performed by PSIPRED.30 The domain search against the protein family database was executed with Pfam.31 Interhelical angles between α-helices were calculated using QHELIX.32 The electrostatic surface potential was calculated by PDB2PQR server33 and visualized by the APBS plugin of PyMOL.28,34
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff of the PAL BL 4A and the ALS beamline 8.3.1 for their assistance during data collection, Dr. Daniel Southworth for the help in SEC-MALLS, and Robin Aglietti for the proofreading of manuscript. Database: The coordinates of the structure for Escherichia coli Spy have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession number 3OEO.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- Bae
bacterial adaptive response
- Cpx
conjugation plasmid expression
- EcSpy
the matured form of Escherichia coli Spy
- ESR
extracytoplasmic stress response
- MtCsoR
Mycobacterium tuberculosis copper-sensitive operon repressor
- Rcs
regulator of colanic acid capsule synthesis
- RMSD
root mean square deviation
- SEC-MALLS
size exclusion chromatography with multiangle laser light scattering
References
- 1.Dorel C, Lejeune P, Rodrigue A. The Cpx system of Escherichia coli, a strategic signaling pathway for confronting adverse conditions and for settling biofilm communities? Res Microbiol. 2006;157:306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Buelow DR, Raivio TL. Cpx signal transduction is influenced by a conserved N-terminal domain in the novel inhibitor CpxP and the periplasmic protease DegP. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:6622–6630. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.19.6622-6630.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raivio TL, Popkin DL, Silhavy TJ. The Cpx envelope stress response is controlled by amplification and feedback inhibition. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5263–5272. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.17.5263-5272.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raivio TL, Silhavy TJ. Periplasmic stress and ECF sigma factors. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:591–624. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rowley G, Spector M, Kormanec J, Roberts M. Pushing the envelope: extracytoplasmic stress responses in bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:383–394. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruiz N, Silhavy TJ. Sensing external stress: watchdogs of the Escherichia coli cell envelope. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8:122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wick LM, Egli T. Molecular components of physiological stress responses in Escherichia coli. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2004;89:1–45. doi: 10.1007/b93957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hagenmaier S, Stierhof YD, Henning U. A new periplasmic protein of Escherichia coli which is synthesized in spheroplasts but not in intact cells. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2073–2076. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.6.2073-2076.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raivio TL, Laird MW, Joly JC, Silhavy TJ. Tethering of CpxP to the inner membrane prevents spheroplast induction of the cpx envelope stress response. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:1186–1197. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yamamoto K, Ishihama A. Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to external copper. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:215–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamamoto K, Ogasawara H, Ishihama A. Involvement of multiple transcription factors for metal-induced spy gene expression in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2008;133:196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zoetendal EG, Smith AH, Sundset MA, Mackie RI. The BaeSR two-component regulatory system mediates resistance to condensed tannins in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:535–539. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02271-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garbe TR, Kobayashi M, Yukawa H. Indole-inducible proteins in bacteria suggest membrane and oxidant toxicity. Arch Microbiol. 2000;173:78–82. doi: 10.1007/s002030050012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bury-Mone S, Nomane Y, Reymond N, Barbet R, Jacquet E, Imbeaud S, Jacq A, Bouloc P. Global analysis of extracytoplasmic stress signaling in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Isaac DD, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ, Silhavy TJ. The extracytoplasmic adaptor protein CpxP is degraded with substrate by DegP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17775–17779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508936102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Holm L, Kaariainen S, Rosenstrom P, Schenkel A. Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2780–2781. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tarricone C, Xiao B, Justin N, Walker PA, Rittinger K, Gamblin SJ, Smerdon SJ. The structural basis of Arfaptin-mediated cross-talk between Rac and Arf signalling pathways. Nature. 2001;411:215–219. doi: 10.1038/35075620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu T, Ramesh A, Ma Z, Ward SK, Zhang L, George GN, Talaat AM, Sacchettini JC, Giedroc DP. CsoR is a novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis copper-sensing transcriptional regulator. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:60–68. doi: 10.1038/nchembio844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Terwilliger TC. Automated main-chain model building by template matching and iterative fragment extension. Acta Cryst. 2003;D59:38–44. doi: 10.1107/S0907444902018036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Terwilliger TC, Berendzen J. Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Cryst. 1999;D55:849–861. doi: 10.1107/S0907444999000839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Cryst. 2004;D60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Potterton E, Briggs P, Turkenburg M, Dodson E. A graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. Acta Cryst. 2003;D59:1131–1137. doi: 10.1107/s0907444903008126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Cryst. 1997;D53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brünger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T, Warren GL. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst. 1998;D54:905–921. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Cryst. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
- 28.DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. San Carlos: DeLano Scientific; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter. 2002;2 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00. 2.3.1–2.3.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:404–405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D281–D288. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee HS, Choi J, Yoon S. QHELIX: a computational tool for the improved measurement of inter-helical angles in proteins. Protein J. 2007;26:556–561. doi: 10.1007/s10930-007-9097-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W665–W667. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10037–10041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181342398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]