Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 1972 Oct;14(4):407–417. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197210000-00001

Malignant Tumors Arising De Novo in Immunosuppressed Organ Transplant Recipients1

Israel Penn 1, Thomas E Starzl 1
PMCID: PMC3006181  NIHMSID: NIHMS243275  PMID: 4345337

Summary

De novo malignant tumors have been observed throughout the world in 75 chronic survivors of organ transplantation, including 16 of our own patients. The incidence of tumors was approximately 80 times greater than in the average population in a comparable age range. Chronic uremia may have predisposed to the development of some of the tumors, but this has not yet been proved. It seems clear that the predominant etiology was chronic immunosuppression post-transplantation. Forty-four of the patients had epithelial tumors and in 31 the lesions were of mesenchymal origin. On the average the malignancies appeared 29 months after transplantation. Lymphomas showed an unusual predilection for involvement of the central nervous system. Carcinomas of the skin, lip, and uterine cervix were successfully treated by conventional techniques. On the other hand, carcinomas of the thoracic or abdominal organs and mesenchymal tumors led or contributed to early death in most cases. For this reason drastic reduction or even discontinuance of immunosuppression should be considered in the management of these latter tumors.


In recent years a convincing association between immunosuppression and malignant neoplasms in organ transplant recipients has become evident. In some patients tumors have been accidentally transplanted from donors with cancer (15, 28, 29), or there has been growth of residual or metastatic tumor in patients with preexisting malignancy (15, 28, 29), or neoplasms have arisen de novo at some time after transplantation. This report will be restricted to the last group of tumors.

After we first described the development of de novo malignancies in renal homograft recipients in 1968 (18, 25, 27), an informal tumor registry was established in Denver. Physicians from transplant centers throughout the world have generously contributed data concerning their patients. The present report deals with all cases recorded until December 31, 1971 and involves 75 patients with 76 types of tumors.

Incidence

Up to the fall of 1971, 7,581 renal and 179 cardiac homografts had been reported to the American Cancer Society-National Institutes of Health Organ Transplant Registry (2). However, it is well recognized that these figures are incomplete as are the numbers of tumors reported. In order to determine accurately the incidence of de novo malignancies, we have reviewed the renal transplantation experience at the University of Colorado Medical Center and the Denver Veterans Administration Hospital. The studies involved patients treated between November 1962 and July 1, 1971, who on December 31, 1971 had potential followups of from 6 months to more than 9 years. Sixteen of 352 patients had developed tumors (Tables 1 and 2), giving a crude incidence of 4.5%. This figure does not reflect the true frequency of post-transplantation neoplasia, since 66 patients died of a variety of other complications before the end of the 4th postoperative month. The 16 tumors occurred in the remaining 286 patients for a partially corrected incidence of 5.6%. This correction, obtained by excluding from the denominator those patients who did not survive a minimum of 4 months after transplantation, may no longer be justified, since tumors have been diagnosed in several centers during this early period as will be described later.

Table 1. Epithelial tumors in organ homograft recipients.

Case No. Transplant center Age at time of transplant (years) Sex Donor Immunosuppression by Type of tumor Time after transplantation (months) Organs involved Outcome Referring physician

Splenectomy Thymectomy Imuran Prednisone ALG

1 Denver 37 F Unrelated living Yes Yes Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 50 Cervix of uterus Alive, no recurrence after hysterectomy
2 Minneapolis 28 F Brother No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 30 Cervix of uterus Alive, no recurrence after hysterectomy R. L. Simmons
3 Montreal 38 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 6 Cervix of uterus Alive, no recurrence after cryosurgery K. Pritzker
4 Los Angeles 38 F Mother No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 35 Cervix of uterus; anterior wall of vagina Alive, no recurrence after excision A. Gordon
5 Richmond 33 F Sister No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 36 Cervix of uterus Cone biopsy; patient being observed at regular intervals H. Lee
6 Denver 26 F Father Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 65 Cervix of uterus Died of causes unrelated to carcinoma
7 Denver 17 F Father Yes No Yes Yes Yes Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 51 Cervix of uterus Alive, awaiting hysterectomy
8 Minneapolis 32 F Sister Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma in situ 45 Cervix of uterus Alive, no recurrence after hysterectomy R. L. Simmons
9 Denver 40 M Unrelated living Yes No Yes Yes No Superficial squamous cell carcinoma 66 Lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision
10 Denver 39 M Brother Yes Yes Yes Yes No Superficial squamous cell carcinoma 36 Lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision
11 Louisville 35 M Brother No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 8 Lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision D. Leb
12 Los Angeles 27 M Mother No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 25 Lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision R. Goldman
13 Los Angeles 25 F Brother No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 35 Lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision R. Goldman
14 Salt Lake City 42 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Squamous cell carcinoma 32 Lip Alive, no recurrence following excision L. Stevens
15 San Francisco 28 M Cadaver
Cadaver
Yes No Yes Yes No Infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma 32 Lower left lip Alive, recurrent lesion in lip removed 6 months after primary excision F. O. Belzer
16 San Francisco 23 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes No Infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma 37 Right lower lip Alive, no recurrence following excision F. O. Belzer
17 Denver 40 M Unrelated living Yes Yes Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 32 Skin of ear No recurrence after excision, died of other causes
18 Denver 43 M Uncle Yes No Yes Yes Yes Basal cell carcinoma 33 Nasolabial fold Alive, no recurrence following excision
19 Denver 30 M Brother Yes Yes Yes Yes No Basal cell carcinoma 75 Nasolabial fold Alive, no recurrence following excision
20 Denver 34 M Sister Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 74 Left forearm; right forearm; right arm; scalp Dead (myocardial infarction)
21 Stockholm 58 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Multiple squamous cell carcinomas 38 Scalp Alive C. Franksson
22 Denver 22 M Cousin Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 78 Left hand Alive, no recurrence following excision
23 Denver 30 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes Yes Superficial squamous cell carcinomas 36 Face (3 areas) Alive, 4 fresh areas excised from face and neck 4 months after initial lesions
24a Sydney 44 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Basal cell carcinoma 3 Nose Alive following radiotherapy J. F. Mahony
25 Sydney 48 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Multiple squamous cell carcinomas
Basal cell carcinoma
29 Forehead; right nasolabial fold; left temple; left preauricular lymph node Alive following excisions and radiotherapy J. H. Stewart
26 Denver 21 M Father Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 87 Skin of face Alive following excision W. Alexander
27 San Francisco 41 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 73 Multiple sites dorsum of left hand Alive following wide excision F. O. Belzer
28 San Francisco 46 M Sister Yes No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 76 Floor of mouth; tongue; cervical lymph nodes Dead F. O. Belzer
29 Nashville 34 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Squamous cell carcinoma 62 Metastases in lymph nodes of neck; later widespread metastases; primary site of tumor unknown Dead C. Zukoski
30 Montreal 13 M Brother No No Yes Yes No Hepatocellular carcinoma 32 Liver Dead K. Pritzker
31 Toronto 8 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Well differentiated hepatoma 13 Liver Dead A. Millner
32 Minneapolis 27 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes No Undifferentiated carcinoma 10 Liver; brain; bone marrow Dead C. Hitchcock
33 Nashville 47 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Undifferentiated carcinoma 19 Lung; mediastinal lymph nodes; brain; liver Dead C. Zukoski
34 Denver 44 F Sister Yes No Yes Yes Yes Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma 31 Lung Dead
35 San Francisco 46 M Son; cadaver Yes No Yes Yes No Alveolar cell carcinoma of lung 9 Lungs Dead S. Kountz
36 Sydney 43 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes (after development of tumor) Adenocarcinoma 32 Lungs; mediastinal lymph nodes; liver Dead J. F. Mahony
37 Minneapolis 16 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Dysgerminoma 32 Ovary; peritoneum; mediastinal and axillary lymph nodes Dead W. Kelly
38a Louisville 32 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes No Embryonal cell carcinoma 2 Testis; abdominal organs; ureter of transplanted kidney; lung Dead D. Leb
39 Ghent 53 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Adenocarcinoma 35 Sigmoid colon; liver Dead F. Derom
40a Chicago 41 M Brother No No Yes Yes No Adenocarcinoma 1 Colon Dead D. Jonasson
41b Cape Town 52 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Anaplastic small cell adenocarcinoma 17 Stomach; liver; mesentery; peritoneum Dead S. Bosman
42c Toronto 21 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Highly anaplastic transitional cell tumor 6 Kidney; liver; brain; heart; lung Dead G. DeVeber
43a Cleveland 45 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Adenocarcinoma 1 Thyroid gland Alive following thyroidectomy S. Deodhar
44 San Francisco 32 F Brother
Cadaver
Yes No Yes Yes No Adenocarcinoma 32 Breast; axillary lymph nodes Alive following radical mastectomy F. O. Belzer
a

Tumors may have been present at time of transplantation.

b

Heart transplant recipient.

c

Tumor may have been present in homograft at time of transplantation.

Table 2. Mesenchymal tumors in organ homograft recipients.

Case No. Transplant center Age at time of transplant (years) Sex Donor Immunosuppression by Type of tumor Time after transplantation (months) Organs involved Outcome Referring physician

Splenectomy Thymectomy Imuran Prednisone ALG

1 Denver 14 M Mother Yes No Yes Yes Yes Reticulum cell sarcoma Brain Dead
2 Denver 23 M Father Yes Yes Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 30 Thyroid; liver; lung; stomach; prostate; pituitary; skin; psoas muscle Dead
3 Edinburgh 26 F Mother No No Yes Yes Yes Reticulum cell sarcoma 25 Lymph nodes; pleura; spleen; liver; ovary; adrenal; bone marrow; transplanted kidney Dead M. Woodruff
4 Cleveland 32 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Reticulum cell sarcoma 22 Buttock; lungs; aortic lymph nodes Dead S. D. Deodhar
5 Richmond 38 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 31 Lung; aortic lymph nodes Dead J. Pierce
6 Auckland 34 M Cadaver
Cadaver
Cadaver
No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 7 Tongue; esophagus; liver Dead P. Doak
7 Auckland 46 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 9 Brain Dead P. Doak
8 New York 18 M Uncle No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 9 Brain Dead R. Porro
9 New York 36 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 10 Brain Dead F. Veith
10 Richmond 29 M Brother Yes No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 67 Widespread lymph nodes; liver; vertebrae Dead H. Lee
11 Little Rock 21 M Father Yes No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 24 Brain Dead C. Araoz
12 San Francisco 39 F Sister Yes No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 14 Brain; lungs Dead F. O. Belzer
13 Richmond 18 M Father Yes No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 73 Widespread lymph nodes; liver; pancreas; bone marrow; meninges; bladder; testes; transplanted kidney; accessory spleen; sciatic nerve; lung Dead H. M. Lee
14 Oklahoma City 19 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 13 Lungs; liver; spleen; rectum; transplanted kidney; mesentery; bone marrow Dead Y. Muto
15 Chicago 52 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma Brain Dead N. Levine
16 New York 28 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 7 Liver Dead L. Burrows
17 San Francisco 40 F Cadaver
Cadaver
No No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 14 Brain Dead F. O. Belzer
18 Galveston 45 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Reticulum cell sarcoma 19 S.c. tissues of buttock Alivec J. C. Fish
(Had thoracic duct fistula)
19 Zurich 50 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Malignant reticulosis 8 Liver; spleen; lymph nodes; bone marrow; esophagus; tongue; transplanted kidney; adrenal glands Dead W. Wegmann
(Had thoracic duct fistula)
20 Israel 34 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Reticulum cell sarcoma 9 Brain Deadd B. Myers
Kaposi's sarcoma Skin
21 Israel 27 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Kaposi's sarcoma 8 Skin; mucosa of mouth Alivee B. Myers
22 New York 35 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Visceral Kaposi's sarcoma 10 Lungs; esophagus; stomach; urinary bladder; mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes Dead J. H. Siegel
23 Denver 20 F Father Yes No Yes Yes Yes Unclassified lymphoma 7 Brain Alive following radiotherapy
24 Los Angeles 23 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Unclassified lymphoma 46 Brain Dead R. Goldman
25a Montreal 29 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Unclassified lymphoma 2 Spinal cord Dead P. Daloze
26 San Francisco 21 M Brother
Cadaver
Cadaver
Cadaver
Yes No Yes Yes No Reticulum cell sarcoma 41 Brain (multifocal); cervical lymph nodes Dead F. O. Belzer
27a Edmonton 8 M Father No No Yes Yes No Lymphosarcoma Brain; meninges Dead W. Lakey
28 Boston 34 M Cadaver; half-sister No No Yes Yes No Leiomyosarcoma 47 Stomach; perigastric lymph node; peritoneum; bowel; liver; lungs; vertebrae and ribs Dead R. E. Wilson
29 Montreal 36 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Leiomyosarcoma 51 Small bowel; liver; pancreas Dead L. D. MacLean
30b Chapel Hill 39 M Cadaver No No Yes Yes Yes Synovial sarcoma 12 Lungs; liver; small bowel; right popliteal fossa Dead W. B. Blythe
31 New York 40 F Cadaver No No Yes Yes No Rhabdomyosarcoma 19 Iliac muscles Dead L. Burrows
a

Tumors may have been present at time of transplantation.

b

Tumor first diagnosed 9 months after immunosuppressive therapy had been discontinued.

c

Alive 3 months following radical local excision and radiotherapy and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy.

d

Tumors had disappeared following resection or irradiation of the lesions and withdrawal of ALG and Imuran therapy; no tumors at autopsy.

e

No recurrence after irradiation of lesions and withdrawal of ALG and Imuran therapy.

The rate of tumor development in these generally young patients (3½–53 years old, average age approximately 28 years) compares with an annual incidence of 58/100,000 (0.058%) in the general population in a comparable age range (7). The latter statistic excludes carcinomas in situ. In our transplant series 3 of the 16 malignancies were of this kind. Even if these 3 cases are omitted the incidence of malignancy in the 286 patients is 4.5%, still a high figure.

Tumor Types and Organs Affected

Of the 76 tumors reported to date, 44 were of epithelial origin (Table 1). The most common of these were squamous or basal cell skin carcinomas (11 cases), in situ carcinomas of the cervix uteri (8 cases), carcinomas of the lip (8 cases), carcinomas of the lung (3 cases), hepatomas (2 cases), colonic carcinomas (2 cases), and highly anaplastic carcinomas of uncertain origin (2 cases). In addition, there was one example each of carcinoma of the ovary, testis, floor of the mouth, stomach, thyroid, and breast. In a further case the origin of a widespread squamous cell neoplasm was never established. There was also a case of a primary carcinoma involving the transplanted kidney (case 42, Table 1), but there is some question as to whether this was truly a de novo neoplasm or whether a small undetected tumor may have been present in the organ at the time it was harvested from a cadaver donor.

Thirty-two mesenchymal tumors were encountered in 31 patients (Table 2). These neoplasms were a much more homogenous group in that 28 were varieties of lymphoma including 21 examples of reticulum cell sarcoma. One of the latter patients also had a Kaposi's sarcoma. This type of lesion was found in two further patients, while unclassified lymphomas were found in 3, and a lymphosarcoma was found in 1. Of the nonlymphomatous tumors, 2 were leiomyosarcomas, 1 was a synovial sarcoma, and 1 was a rhabdomyosarcoma.

An unusual feature of the lymphomas was the frequency with which the central nervous system was involved (21, 22). Of the 27 patients with lymphoma there were 14 with involvement of either the brain or spinal cord including 10 of the patients with reticulum cell sarcoma, 3 with unclassified lymphoma, and 1 patient with lymphosarcoma. Lymphoreticular tumors within the central nervous system are uncommon (0.04 and 1.5% in two large series) (19, 20); yet, in 11 instances in the present study, the brain or spinal cord were the only regions so affected. Probable explanations for the high incidence of central nervous system involvement have been discussed elsewhere (17, 21, 22).

Behavior of Tumors

The mesenchymal tumors occurred in a slightly younger average age group than the epithelial lesions, 31 years compared with 35 years. The average time of appearance of the tumors after transplantation was 29 months. The mesenchymal neoplasms occurred at an average of 21 months after operation compared with the longer interval of 35 months with the carcinomas.

A number of the epithelial tumors were of low grade malignancy and were treated successfully by conventional techniques (Table 1). Of the 44 patients in this group, 26 are currently alive including most of the patients with carcinomas of the skin, cervix uteri, and lip. The deaths of 3 patients with these latter lesions were unrelated to cancer. In contrast, the epithelial malignancies within the thorax and abdomen were the primary cause of death or contributed significantly to the fatal outcome. The recipients with mesenchymal tumors had a similar gloomy prognosis in that only 3 of the 31 patients are currently alive.

Borderline Lesions

An interesting feature of the present report is that in 6 of the 75 cases, the lesions were diagnosed in less than 4 months after transplantation (Tables 1 and 2). These included one case each of carcinoma of the skin, testis, colon, and thyroid gland, a lymphosarcoma of the brain, and a lymphoma of the spinal cord. One reasonable explanation could be that at least some of these tumors or even some of those with a later appearance were already present at the time of transplantation, but were small and undetected, and grew rapidly under the influence of the immunosuppressive therapy. This raises the question whether chronic renal failure per se may predispose the patient to malignant disease (15) by virtue of the well known depression in uremia of immune responses (6, 10, 13, 32).

Observations reported to the National Dialysis Registry (5) are neither for nor against this hypothesis. Among 4,600 patients on chronic dialysis programs, 1% were reported to have died from malignancies. However, these statistics were incomplete, as the cause of death in 7% of the patients was not known; besides, the patients' ages were not stated so it is not possible to compare cancer death rates in this group with those in the general population. Furthermore, the Dialysis Registry does not provide figures giving the incidence of tumors among living dialysis patients.

Among our own 352 renal recipients, there have been 3 patients who were proved to have malignant growths prior to transplantation. The lesions were of the bladder, the thyroid, and the skin. The thyroid carcinoma was an incidental finding at autopsy following sudden death 2 days after transplantation, but the bladder and skin cancers required surgical management both before and after transplantation. These latter tumors are now under control with post-transplantation followups of 1 and 2½ years.

A similar case to our thyroid carcinoma was in a patient of Dr. R. Simmons (personal communication) who underwent a parathyroidectomy 2 weeks after renal transplantation and was found to have an unsuspected papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland. A patient on chronic hemodialysis at our medical center (A. Alfrey, personal communication) was also found to have a carcinoma of the thyroid gland during parathyroidectomy. Other malignancies encountered in patients with chronic uremia include a carcinoma of the parathyroid gland discovered during thymectomy performed 2 months before renal transplantation (S. Nakamoto, personal communication), a rhabdomyosarcoma of the shoulder in a patient on hemodialysis who was awaiting a cadaver kidney transplant (P. Inanovitch, personal communication), and a carcinoma of the ureter in a patient with chronic renal failure caused by analgesic nephropathy (M. Robertson, personal communication).

If uremia predisposed to malignancy by loss of immunological surveillance, it would not be surprising if carcinomas were found in the diseased native kidneys that are often excised before or at the time of transplantation. In our own case material, there have been no such examples. However, 12 cases of renal neoplasia have now been collected in patients with chronic renal failure. The features of these interesting cases are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Renal neoplasms in patients with chronic uremia.

Case No. Transplant or dialysis center Age
(years)
Sex Underlying renal disease Type of tumor Mode of presentation Relationship to transplantation Referring physician

1 Minneapolis 45 F Chronic glomerulonephritis Hypernephroma of right kidney Mass in upper pole of right kidney Not transplanted; on hemodialysis R. Simmons
2 San Francisco 29 M Chronic glomerulonephritis Renal cell carcinoma of left kidney invading capsule and perinephric fat Incidental finding at bilateral nephrectomy Twenty months before transplantation F. Belzer
3 Cleveland Not stated Not stated Not stated Renal cell carcinoma involving a solitary kidney Incidental finding at nephrectomy Four weeks before transplantation S. Nakamoto-
4 Edinburgh Not stated Not stated Not stated Hypernephroma of one of the kidneys Incidental finding at bilateral nephrectomy for persistent hypertension After transplantation M. Woodruff
5a New York (Cornell) 18 M End stage renal disease Low grade papillary renal carcinoma of right kidney Incidental finding when kidneys re moved At the time of transplantation R. Porro
6a Boston 34 M Chronic glomerulonephritis (1) Well differentiated renal cell carcinoma of left kidney; (2) two adenomas of right kidneyb Incidental finding when kidneys removed At the time of a second transplantation 3 months after insertion of a first homograft which never functioned R. E. Wilson
7 Ann Arbor 43 M End stage renal disease Renal cell carcinoma of right kidney Incidental finding when kidneys removed At the time of transplantation J. Turcotte
8 London 44 M Hyperparathyroidism with nephrocalcinosis Renal carcinoma of both kidneys Incidental finding when kidneys removed Ten months before transplantation J. Salaman
9 Los Angeles 35 M Malignant hypertension Hypernephroma of a kidney Massive retroperitoneal hemorrhage from the affected kidney Fifteen months before transplantation T. Berne
10 Dallas 21 M Chronic glomerulonephritis Renal cell carcinoma in one of his kidneys Gross hematuria at age 18 years approximately 15 months alter immunosuppressive treatment with Imuran and prednisone was started; workup showed mass lesion in one kidney Not transplanted; on chronic hemodialysis for approximately 3 years P. Peters
11 Minneapolis 48 F Chronic pyelonephritis Adenoma of left kidneyb Incidental finding at bilateral nephrectomy Awaiting transplantation R. Simmons
12 Tucson 43 M Chronic glomerulonephritis Adenoma of left kidneyb Incidental finding at bilateral nephrectomy Several weeks before transplantation C. Zukoski
a

These patients are cases 8 and 28 in Table 2.

b

There is considerable disagreement among pathologists concerning the difference between a large renal adenoma and a small renal carcinoma. A lesion less than 2 cm in diameter is often regarded as an adenoma and a larger lesion is often regarded as a carcinoms.

Etiology of Tumors

Apart from the possibility of preexisting neoplasia in the recipients, it is necessary to consider whether tumors were inadvertently transplanted from the donors. The 75 recipients received their transplants from 85 donors, 41 living volunteers, and 44 cadavers. None of the living donors has manifested evidence of malignant disease during followup periods as long as 9 years. Two cadaver donors (cases 4 and 28, Table 2) had medulloblastomas, whereas the recipients subsequently developed a gluteal reticulum cell sarcoma and a gastric leiomyosarcoma, respectively. The tumors in donor and recipient were morphologically distinct and there was probably no etiological connection unless they were both caused by an oncogenic virus that was transmitted with the donor kidney. A further cadaver donor (case 9, Table 2) had had a carcinoma of the colon resected 5 years previously but was apparently free of tumor at the time of transplantation. The recipient developed a reticulum cell sarcoma.

In experimental animals (15, 26, 28), each of the main immunosuppressive agents, azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphocyte globulin (ALG), has been shown either to: (1) increase the incidence of spontaneous, virus-induced, or chemically initiated tumors; (2) facilitate the ease with which malignant cells can be transplanted; or (3) accelerate metastatic growth. Thymectomy or splenectomy may also cause increased oncogenic susceptibility in experimental animals (15, 26, 28).

In man there has so far been no evidence that any one of the individual immunosuppressive measures has made a unique contribution to the development of post-transplantation neoplasia. All the patients (Tables 1 and 2) received azathioprine and prednisone, 30 underwent splenectomy, 5 had thymectomy, and 2 had thoracic duct fistulas. It is of interest that 22 of 44 patients with epithelial tumors (50%) underwent splenectomy, whereas 8 of 31 (26%) with mesenchymal tumors were subjected to this procedure. Only 21 of the 75 patients were treated with ALG and 2 of these recipients received this therapy after the appearance of the tumor. In view of these findings it is difficult to understand the origin of the widespread misconception that the incidence of tumors in the post-transplantation period has increased since the introduction of ALG therapy.

The disproportionately high incidence of lymphomas may, in part, be an artefact in that there may be a tendency to report to the registry only the more florid and lethal malignancies and to dismiss many skin tumors or in situ carcinomas of the cervix as relatively unimportant. However, the disproportionate numbers of lymphomas may be real and may reflect the effects upon the host of the transplanted organ with its foreign histocompatibility antigens. Prolonged antigenic stimulation of the host reticuloendothelial system has been shown to cause a high incidence of lymphomas (1, 12, 23, 24, 31).

While this may be the cause of at least some of the lymphomas, the most likely explanation for the wide spectrum of tumors observed in the present series is that chronic immunosuppression causes loss of the immunological surveillance mechanism by which tumor mutants are normally detected and destroyed (3, 4, 30). This does not exclude other possible etiological factors such as a direct oncogenic effect of the immunosuppressive agents, potentiation of the effects of environmental carcinogens such as tobacco, ultraviolet light, or irradiation, or activation of oncogenic viruses. Concerning the last possibility, infection by viruses of the Herpes family have been very common in transplant recipients. Two human strains belonging to this group, the Epstein-Barr and Herpes hominis II viruses, have been found to be commonly associated with although not necessarily responsible for Burkitt's lymphoma and uterine cervical carcinoma, respectively.

Treatment of Tumors

The epithelial malignancies of the skin, lip, and uterine cervix were successfully treated by standard surgical or radiotherapeutic techniques without risking the homografts by arbitrary reductions in immunosuppression. This approach has proved inadequate for dealing with most carcinomas involving the thoracic and abdominal organs and with most mesenchymal tumors. In view of the virtually hopeless prognosis it may be advisable to reduce drastically or even discontinue the immunosuppressive therapy. Three patients (cases 18, 21, and 23, Table 2) with mesenchymal tumors are currently alive following this form of treatment. One of the patients (case 23) is in excellent health more than 4½ years after transplantation and 4 years after the tumor was diagnosed. Two other patients (case 20, Table 2; case 37, Table 1), in whom immunosuppression was drastically reduced, died of septicemia and rejection, respectively, but at autopsy it was found that the previously widespread tumors had completely regressed.

If drastic reduction in immunosuppression fails to control the neoplasm, then some form of immunotherapy can be attempted (9, 11, 14).

Future Prospects

The development of de novo malignant tumors in chronically immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients has added a new dimension to our understanding of the nature of cancer by emphasizing the role played by immune mechanisms in the control of neoplasia. Fortunately, the incidence of tumors is sufficiently low as not to contraindicate transplantation as a form of therapy. Much remains to be learned about the nature of the tumors. Electron microscope and culture studies are currently in progress to determine the role played by oncogenic viruses. Other investigations are aimed at determining whether patients with particular HL-A specificities may be more prone to the development of cancer as has been found in some forms of lymphoma (8) or whether certain HL-A mismatches between donor and recipient might lead to malignant change.

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by research grants from the Veterans Administration, by Grants RR-00051 and RR-00069 from the General Clinical Research Centers Program of the Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, and by Grants AI-10176-01, AI-AM-08898, AM-07772, and HE-09110 from the United States Public Health Service.

References

  • 1.Armstrong MYK, Schwartz RS, Beldotti L. Transplantation. 1967;6:1380. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bergan JJ. ACS-NIH Organ Transplant Registry Fall Newsletter 1971 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burnet FM. Brit Med J. 1957;1:779, 841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5022.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burnet FM. Progr Exp Tumor Res. 1970;13:1. doi: 10.1159/000386035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burton BT, Krueger KK, Bryan FA., Jr J Amer Med Assoc. 1971;218:718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dammin GJ, Couch NP, Murray JE. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957;64:967. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb52488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doll R, Payne P, Waterhouse J, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents A technical report (UICC) Springer-Verlag; New York: 1966. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Forbes JF, Morris PJ. Tissue Antigens. 1971;1:265. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1971.tb00104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Humphrey LJ. J Surg Res. 1970;10:493. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(70)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kasakura S, Lowenstein L. Transplantation. 1967;5:283. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196705000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mathé G. Brit Med J. 1969;4:7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5674.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Metcalf D. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum. 1963;19:657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morrison AB, Maness K, Tawes R. Arch Pathol. 1963;75:139. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morton DL, Holmes EC, Eilber FR, Wood WC. Ann Int Med. 1971;74:587. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Penn I. Malignant tumors in organ transplant recipients. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Penn I, Starzl TE. Int J Clin Pharmacol. 1970;1:106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Penn I, Halgrimson CG, Starzl TE. Transpl Proc. 1971;3:773. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Penn I, Hammond W, Brettschneider L, Starzl TE. Transpl Proc. 1969;1:106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Richmond J, Sherman RS, Diamond HD, Craver LF. Amer J Med. 1962;32:184. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(62)90289-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosenberg SA, Diamond HD, Jaslowitz B, Craver LF. Medicine. 1961;40:31. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196102000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schneck SA, Penn I. Arch Neurol. 1970;22:226. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1970.00480210036004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schneck SA, Penn I. Lancet. 1971;1:983. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91384-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schwartz R, Andre-Schwartz J. Ann Rev Med. 1968;19:269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.19.020168.001413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schwartz R, Andre-Schwartz J, Armstrong MYK, Beldotti C. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966;129:804. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Starzl TE. Ann Surg. 1968;168:416. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196809000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Starzl TE. Experience, in hepatic transplantation. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1969. p. 350. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Starzl TE, Groth CG, Brettschneider L, Smith GV, Penn I, Kashiwagi N. Antibiot Chemother. 1969;15:349. doi: 10.1159/000386790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Starzl TE, Penn I, Putnam CW, Groth CG, Halgrimson CG. Transpl Rev. 1971;7:112. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1971.tb00465.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Starzl TE, Putnam CW, Brettschneider L, Penn I. Proceedings of the sixth national cancer conference; Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott; 1970. p. 45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomas L. In: Cellular and humoral aspects of the hypersensitive states. Lawrence HS, editor. Hoeber; New York: 1959. p. 530. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Walford RL, Hildemann WH. Amer J Pathol. 1965;46:713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wilson WEC, Kirkpatriek CH. In: Experience in renal transplantation. Starzl TE, editor. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1964. p. 239. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES