Abstract
Background
Influenza viruses show a significant capacity to evade host immunity; this is manifest both as large occasional jumps in the antigenic phenotype of viral surface molecules and in gradual antigenic changes leading to annual influenza epidemics in humans. Recent mouse studies show that avidity for host cells can play an important role in polyclonal antibody escape, and further that electrostatic charge of the hemagglutinin glycoprotein can contribute to such avidity.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We test the role of glycoprotein charge on sequence data from the three major subtypes of influenza A in humans, using a simple method of calculating net glycoprotein charge. Of all subtypes, H3N2 in humans shows a striking pattern of increasing positive charge since its introduction in 1968. Notably, this trend applies to both hemagglutinin and neuraminidase glycoproteins. In the late 1980s hemagglutinin charge reached a plateau, while neuraminidase charge started to decline. We identify key groups of amino acid sites involved in this charge trend.
Conclusions/Significance
To our knowledge these are the first indications that, for human H3N2, net glycoprotein charge covaries strongly with antigenic drift on a global scale. Further work is needed to elucidate how such charge interacts with other immune escape mechanisms, such as glycosylation, and we discuss important questions arising for future study.
Introduction
The influenza A virus is a prominent example of a pathogen capable of adapting to evade host immunity [1], [2], with profound implications for epidemiology and control. Hence, for example, seasonal influenza vaccines need to be updated frequently, to maintain protection in risk-groups against currently circulating strains [3].
Immunity to influenza is mediated predominantly by neutralizing antibodies raised against two surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) [4]. Antigenic ‘drift’ refers to the incremental adaptations in these antigens from year to year, forming the basis for immune evasion. However, while phenomenological characteristics of drift have been well-characterised [5], [6], the key molecular and evolutionary determinants of immune escape remain incompletely understood.
Amino acid substitutions directly reducing or abolishing antibody recognition of major epitopes are likely to be the predominant part of immune escape [7]. Glycosylation - the post-transcriptional acquisition of carbohydrate side-chains - can have the additional effect of ‘masking’ epitopes from antibody recognition [8], but at a cost: heavily glycosylated viruses are also more susceptible to capture by the host innate immune system [9].
A recent study [10], using challenges of vaccinated and naïve mice, has highlighted another, potentially significant element of the immune escape repertoire: the selection of ‘adsorptive mutants’, showing enhanced binding to target cells. Demonstrating a strong association between immune escape and avidity for target cells, this study suggests that viral replication success depends on a competition between host-cell binding, and engagement by neutralizing antibodies. Conversely, however, naïve mice show positive selection for reduced avidity, indicating that this strategy of immune escape also carries a fitness cost – this may be due, for example, to high-avidity progeny virions being released less efficiently from host cells.
A notable aspect of avidity demonstrated in this study is that of electrostatic charge – several immune escape mutants show an increased positive charge in HA. From a molecular standpoint, since host cell receptors possess a strong negative charge, virions with a higher net positive charge may tend to promote favourable electrostatic interactions with target cells [11].
The role of electrostatic charge has been appreciated for other human viruses: a notable example is HIV, where a viral phenotype associated with rapid progression to AIDS is distinguished from those associated with early stages of HIV-infection by the presence of charged residues at two amino acid positions on the V3 region of the gp120 subunit [12]. However, the potential relevance of charge to influenza viral dynamics has so far received comparatively little attention.
Thus motivated, we ask the following questions: considering epidemic influenza in humans, is there any indication for the role of electrostatic charge in viral evolution? How might these relate to observed patterns of antigenic drift, most notably for the subtype H3N2? Specifically (in line with [10] , is increasing immune escape during antigenic drift associated with an increase in viral surface charge? We address these questions by exploring secular changes in the net charge on HA and NA molecules revealed by amino acid sequences from published influenza databases. We present a striking pattern of coherent charge accumulation. In contrast with the HIV-V2 protein this pattern involves at least 20 amino acid sites across the length of the hemagglutinin sequence, with a correspondingly greater degree of net charge change accumulated over several decades. Overall, while these observations are not definitive of the role of electric charge in immune escape, they cast light on intriguing, hitherto unreported phenomena, calling for further experimental study. We discuss important questions arising for further investigation.
Methods
At physiological pH, protein-associated amino acids are generally charge-neutral, with five exceptions: Arginine, Histidine and Lysine are ionized with a single positive net charge, while Aspartic acid and Glutamic acid are ionized with a single negative net charge [13]. Given the amino acid sequence for a certain glycoprotein, we may then calculate overall net charge, to a first approximation, simply by summing charge contributions from all of these constituents. In the discussion section we return to qualify the assumption of physiological pH for all amino acids in the sequence.
Sequences for HA and NA were obtained from the NIAID influenza database [14], with the restriction of being full-length to avoid potential biases due to variable sampling of amino acid positions. Identical sequences in the same year were collapsed to a single one, to avoid biases due to over-representation of certain samples in the database. Net glycoprotein charge was then calculated for each sequence, using the approach described above.
Results
Figure 1 shows charge plotted against year of sampling, for the three major subtypes of human influenza: H1N1 (1977–2008), H2N2 and H3N2. There is no apparent pattern for the first two. For the H3N2 subtype, however, charges for both HA and NA show clear increasing trends following introduction of this virus in the Hong Kong pandemic of 1968. Intriguingly this trend changes for both HA and NA in the same year, in 1986. After this point HA charge appears to plateau, while NA charge undergoes a noisy decline.
A potential difficulty with this data set is the variability of viral sampling through time, as illustrated by the size of the points in figure 1 and as plotted in Figure S1. In particular, there is a paucity of full-length sequences collected in the mid-1970s. Nonetheless, a linear regression of charge against year offers a simple approach for testing the statistical support for an increasing HA charge, while allowing for widely varying sample sizes from year to year. Such an approach yields a significance level of p<0.0001, for both HA and for NA. An alternative approach is to choose just two years for comparison, using a t-test to assess support for a statistically significant difference in mean charge from the first timepoint to the second. Applying this to data from 1968 (23 samples) and 1993 (32 samples) once again gives a significance level of p<0.0001, for both HA and NA. Despite the patchiness of data, therefore, there is sufficient evidence to suggest a significant increase in charge between 1968 and 1992.
The HA monomer is an assembly of two subunits: HA1 contains the globular head of the HA molecule, while HA2 contains the stalk region, and is attached to the viral membrane. To explore whether changes in charge occur preferentially in either of these subunits, the procedure above is repeated for the relevant segments of the HA amino acid sequence. Results shown in Figure 2 indicate that the bulk of the charge changes occurred in the HA1 subunit, as might be expected: containing the receptor binding site, this region is most directly involved in attachment to host cells. Thus (as predicted by [10]), H3N2 charge increases in parallel with net antigenic escape, at least over the early part of the virus's history in humans.
It is, of course, possible that this observed trend is only a by-product of HA evolution, without any independent antigenic relevance. To explore this possibility the same charge analysis was applied to NS1 [15], another influenza viral component showing rapid evolution [16], but without the antigenicity of HA or NA in natural infection. NS1 is expressed as a protein only in the intracellular stage of the replication cycle, with the function of antagonising host innate antiviral responses, as well as playing an important role in regulating transcription. Figure 3 plots charge variation of NS1 restricted to human H3N2, showing no significant temporal trend, despite the rapid evolution of this viral component. Hence it would appear that the coherent temporal trends observed for HA and NA are more than simply a by-product of protein evolution.
Returning to the HA1 subunit of Hemagglutinin, we ask which set of amino acid positions accounts for the most temporal variation in charge, with a view to comparing these against known features of H3N2 evolutionary history. As noted earlier (see Figure S1), the number of amino acid sequences available from GenBank is itself variable in time. To avoid artefacts from years with little or no viral sampling we restrict attention to a comparison between samples in 1968, 1985 and 2000, timepoints having 45, 35 and 249 samples respectively.
Figure S2 plots the estimated probability of an amino acid site showing positive or negative charge, plotted along the length of the HA1 sequence in 2000. With three exceptions, sites tend to show clearly dominant charge states (whether positive, neutral or negative) and charge transitions at given sites tend to be characterized by population-level ‘switches’ from one state to another. This is perhaps not surprising, given the comparatively limited population-level diversity of influenza in any given year [17].
As one possible partitioning of amino acid sites, those sites that have undergone a change in charge state from 1968 to 2000 are designated as ‘group 1’. Further, we define ‘group 2’ sites as those showing a change in charge between 1968 and 1985, followed by a reversion between 1985 and 2000, thus resulting in zero net charge difference over the whole time period. Amino acid sites belonging to these two groups are summarized in table 1.
Table 1. Amino acids of the HA1 sequence involved in changes of charge state when comparing 1968, 1985 and 2000.
20001968 | Positive (+) | Neutral | Negative (−) |
Positive (+) | — | 57/156 | — |
Neutral | 142/145/155/158/160/173/276 | 189/197 | 53/62/83/188 |
Negative (−) | 2/82 | 31/63/275 | 172 |
‘Group 2’ amino acids, as defined in the main text, are shown in italics on the diagonal – all three exhibited an increase in charge of +1 in 1985, followed by a reversion before 2000. All other amino acids belong to ‘group 1’. Note that those elements below the diagonal contribute to a positive overall charge, and vice versa for those above the diagonal.
Figure 4 plots charge trends when summed separately over these sets of amino acids, showing clear qualitative and quantitative differences between them. Group 1 amino acids together show a continuous, steady increase in total charge, accounting for the greatest temporal variation between 1968 and 2000. However, panel C demonstrates that incorporating group 2 amino acids accounts for the plateau in total HA charge reached in the early 1990s. The lack of temporal variability in panel D suggests that groups 1 and 2 together capture the essential secular charge variation shown by the whole HA molecule. While it remains unclear what biological relevance – if any – these groupings may have, this basic analysis points to specific amino acid positions that could be relevant in explaining the change in charge trend in the late 1980s.
The right-hand panel of figure 4 shows a visualization of group 1 and 2 amino acid positions on the HA1 structure [18]. A notable feature is the clustering of several of these positions around the receptor binding site (shown in green), the active site for binding with target cell sialic acid. As we might expect, most of these are group 1 positions undergoing a positive charge transition (shown in blue) between 1968 and 2000. Conversely, sites undergoing a negative transition (shown in red) are – with one exception – all further down the HA length.
Comparison with known mechanisms of immune escape
A natural hypothesis arising from [10] is that H3N2 charge covaries with other immune escape mechanisms already known to have been significant in H3N2 evolutionary history. We now explore possible connections with two notable features of H3N2 evolution, namely punctuated antigenic drift, and the accumulation of glycosylation sites.
H3N2 antigenic drift is characterized by stepwise antigenic changes that occur every 2–8 years [5], against a background of a relatively steady rate of amino acid substitutions. Thus H3N2 viruses show grouping into antigenic ‘clusters’, contiguous but overlapping in time. Amino acid substitutions in HA associated with transitions from one cluster to another have previously been identified: calculating the charge contribution from each of these over time (table 2) shows that charge effects ranged from −2 to +3. However, the net change arising from antigenic cluster transitions since 1968 is +1, accounting for only a small part of the total increase of almost +10 that occurred throughout HA during this same period. Thus, on an aggregate level, there is no simple connection between charge and cluster transitions.
Table 2. Amino acid substitutions accompanying antigenic jumps, and their associated charge changes (see [5]).
Year | Amino acid substitutions | Overall charge effect |
1972 | T122N; (G144D); T155Y; (N188D); R207K | 2 − |
1975 | N137S; S145N; L164Q; Q189K; (S193D); (N53D); I278S; F174S; R102K; I213V; I217V; I230V | 1 − |
1977 | S137Y; (G158E); Q164L; D193N; K50R; D53N; S174F; K201R; V213I; V230I; E82K; M260I | 3 + |
1979 | N133S; P143S; G146S; (K156E); T160K; Q197R; (N53D); N54S; D172G; V217I; V244L; 162K; (K82E) | 1 − |
1987 | (G124D); Y155H; K189R | 0 |
1989 | N145K | 1 + |
1992 | (S133D); (K145N); E156K; E190D | 0 |
1995 | N145K | 1 + |
1997 | (K156Q); E158K; V196A; N276K; (K62E); | 0 |
2002 | A131T; (H155T); Q156H; (R50G); (H75Q); E83K; L25I; V202I; W222R; (G225D) | 0 |
While successive antigenic groups overlap in time, ‘year’ denotes the timing of the first vaccine strain incorporating the given substitutions. Substitutions shown in bold denote a net positive change, and vice versa for those in parentheses.
On the level of individual amino acid positions, there are nonetheless some suggestive results: all group 2 amino acids are also implicated in cluster transitions, with their charge switches coinciding with the timing of those jumps. About half of group 1 amino acid sites are involved in cluster transitions. Of these, site 145 is prominent for having the potential to cause unusually large antigenic change, being the sole site involved in two separate cluster transitions [5], in both cases undergoing an increase in positive charge (see table 2). However, further work is needed to elucidate the significance – if any – of these apparent connections.
Another unique feature of human H3N2 evolutionary history is the steady accumulation of potential N-linked glycosylation sites through time. Such positions are characterised by NXS/T sequons, with X being any amino acid other than Proline. Human H3N2 is unique among influenza A subtypes for accumulating potential glycosylation sites since 1968 [19], [20], with evidence that this is in response to selection pressure [21]. There are indeed tangible reasons to expect that glycosylation may interact with charge locally on the HA surface: glycans positioned near the receptor binding site can lower affinity for host cells [22]–[24] and thus increasing positive charge near the glycosylation site could have a compensatory role by mitigating this effect. Alternatively complex glycans may themselves carry a negative charge, by virtue of attached sialic acid, whose effect could again be mitigated by the presence of positive charges near the glycosylation site.
Figure 5 shows the approximate timing of acquisition and loss of glycosylation sequons in HA1 sequences, comparing against the dominant charge states of group 1 and 2 amino acids. In accordance with [19]–[21], the upper panel shows a steady increase in the number of glycosylation sites with time. There are indeed amino acid sites that underwent both a positive charge transition and the acquisition of a potential glycosylation site, such as 63, 276, and the region 81–83. However, such events at these sites are not necessarily synchronous, most apparently being separated by several years, and thus there is no clear causal connection. Further data is needed to explore the possibility of more subtle connections between glycosylation and charge.
We can extend this general analysis to glycoprotein charge in non-human hosts, as detailed in the Appendix. In particular, Figure S3 suggests that H3 HA charge in avian hosts has been relatively stable since 1970, at a level in agreement with that of human H3 in its introduction in 1968. This is indeed as we might expect, given the avian origin of H3 in humans. Figure S4 broadens this search to other subtypes and host species, illustrating that none show a coherent pattern comparable to human H3N2.
Discussion
Conformational changes in epitopic regions undoubtedly play an important – perhaps dominant – role in inhibiting binding by neutralising antibodies. Recent experiments show that the enhancement of avidity for host cells is also a potentially potent mechanism [10]. Here we have demonstrated clear indications that, in the specific case of H3N2, the virus has undergone increasing positive charge since its introduction in humans. Equally intriguing is the apparent uniqueness of this pattern, to H3N2 in humans. Indeed, it is perhaps no coincidence that human H3N2 is a paradigm of antigenic drift, showing an unrivalled tempo and extent of antigenic variation in comparison with other known influenza subtype/host combinations [4].
Some important caveats are in order here: first, there are alternative interpretations for the patterns we observe. For instance, it may well be the case that charge increments are only an incidental effect of substitutions whose primary antigenic impact is a conformational change at active sites. Related to this point, it must be noted that charge is not a necessary feature for increasing avidity, and is therefore only one of several potential immune escape strategies. With these provisions in mind, however, the key message of our results is simple: given the complexity and sheer multiplicity of interacting host and viral factors in viral immune escape, it is striking that such a simple measure of charge should yield such a marked pattern in the global database over several decades. Particularly in the light of previous results of the role of avidity in immune escape [10], we believe the phenomena we have demonstrated here form a basis for testable hypotheses warranting further investigation.
Regarding our simple algorithm for calculating net charge, an assumption requiring some care is that of amino acids being subject to physiological pH. While this is likely to apply for surface residues, those residues internal to the HA structure may instead be associated with significantly altered pKa values. Nonetheless, the HA1 structure shown in figure 4 indicates that such effects would not be expected to significantly alter our results. It illustrates that all group 1 and 2 amino acids are surface residues, and indeed summing charge over these positions alone reproduces the essential secular trend in figure 1 for the whole HA molecule.
The biological significance of these identified sites remains unclear. Moreover, at this point we can only speculate about connections between charge, glycosylation and antigenic clustering. It is relevant to note that there is yet no clear indication of a systematic relationship between H3N2 glycosylation and antigenic clustering [25]. Similarly, the simple comparisons we have conducted here do not yield any immediate relationships with charge. Clearly, however, this preliminary analysis addresses only the simplest hypotheses and says little about the possibility of more subtle interactions. For example, such interactions may be expressed on an aggregate scale: given the comparative sizes of virion and host cell it is possible that for most relevant dynamics the virion acts as a point charge on the physical scale of the cell, characterized more by its net charge than by the distribution of that charge on its surface. More detailed studies of virus-cell interactions in the presence of antibodies would clearly help to resolve questions like these. Furthermore, assays of binding kinetics of viral samples since 1968 will be essential in confirming whether the charge trend demonstrated here does in fact accompany an increase in H3N2 avidity for host cells.
A prominent, unexplained feature of H3N2 glycoprotein charge behaviour is the change in trend, for HA and NA alike, occurring in 1986. It is unclear whether this arises from a change in selection pressure, or from functional constraints on the virus – it is possible, for example, that an upper limit on the total virion charge is required for structural stability. Our preliminary analysis does not suggest any general, direct connection with observed antigenic cluster transitions for H3N2. It is, however, perhaps relevant that a cluster transition occurred in 1987, at about the same time as the shifts in the charge trends. This particular event is notable for at least two reasons: first, it marked the end of an unusually long period free of cluster transitions [5]. Second, in ‘antigenic space’ (as measured by hemagglutination inhibition assays with ferret sera), early antigenic variation proceeded in a predominantly linear fashion from the ancestral, 1968 strain. The transition in 1987 was unusual in breaking this linear trend for the first time [5], possibly showing higher cross-reactivity with previous strains as a result. If indeed relevant, both of these scenarios would point to a role of shifting selection pressure, in the changing trends in charge following 1987.
In addition to the issues raised above, several other potential avenues for future work arise from our observations. While the link between avidity and immune escape has been demonstrated [10], an important question for future experimental study is how these effects translate to viral transmission and hence fitness. A natural extension of existing work would be a study of serial infection or transmission, to allow the accumulation of immune escape mutations over many generations. Virological questions include: is there an inherent limit on the charge that a viral structure can support? How does a virus offset replication costs owing to greater avidity? Interestingly, there were no signs of co-adaptation of NA in [10]. Are there limits on NA function that would explain this?
In its entirety the influenza immune escape repertoire undoubtedly involves several mechanisms, and it is likely that these mechanisms interact. Ultimately, therefore, it is probable that the function of electrostatic charge, and avidity in general, can only be adequately understood in conjunction with other, parallel processes, such as glycosylation. Nonetheless, the prominent patterns we have discussed here point to a potentially significant role for glycoprotein charge, deserving further elucidation.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jonathan Yewdell, Scott Hensley, Andrew Rambaut, Peter Coombs and John McCauley for useful discussion.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R01 GM083983-01 (www.nih.gov). Bryan Grenfell was also supported by the National Science Foundation grant EF-0742373 and the Research and Policy for Infectious Disease Dynamics (RAPIDD) program of the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate and the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Grenfell BT, Pybus OB, Gog JR, Wood JLN, Daley JM, et al. Unifying the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of pathogens. Science. 2004;Jan 16; 303(5656):327–32. doi: 10.1126/science.1090727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holmes EC. RNA virus genomics: a world of possibilities. J Clin Invest. 2009;Sep; 119(9):2488–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI38050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carrat F, Flahault A. Influenza vaccine: the challenge of antigenic drift. Vaccine Sep 28;25(39-40):6852-62. Epub. 2007;2007 Aug 3 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Webster RG, Laver WG, Air GM, Schild GC. Molecular mechanisms of variation in influenza viruses. Nature. 1982;Mar 11; 296(5853):115–21. doi: 10.1038/296115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith DJ, Lapedes AS, de Jong JC, Bestebroer TM, Rimmelzwaan GF, et al. Mapping the antigenic and genetic evolution of influenza virus. Science Jul 16;305(5682):371-6. Epub. 2004;2004 Jun 24 doi: 10.1126/science.1097211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nelson MI, Holmes EC. The evolution of epidemic influenza. Nat Rev Genet Mar;8(3):196-205. Epub. 2007;2007 Jan 30 doi: 10.1038/nrg2053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wilson IA Cox NJ. Structural basis of immune recognition of influenza virus hemagglutinin. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:737–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.003513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schulze IT. Effects of glycosylation on the properties and functions of influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Infect Dis. 1997;Aug;176 (Suppl 1):S24–8. doi: 10.1086/514170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vigerust DJ, Egan BS, Sheperd VL. N-linked glycosylation attenuates H3N2 influenza viruses. J Virol Aug;81(16):8593-600. Epub. 2007;2007 Jun 6 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00769-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hensley SE, Das SR, Bailey AL, Schmidt LM, Hickman HD, et al. Hemagglutinin receptor binding avidity drives influenza A virus antigenic drift. Science. 2009;Oct 30; 326(5953):734–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1178258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gambaryan AS, Matrosovich MN, Bender CA, Kilbourne ED. Differences in the Biological Phenotype of Low-Yielding (L) and High-Yielding (H) Variants of Swine Influenza Virus A/NJ/11/76 Are Associated with Their Different Receptor-Binding Activity. Virology. 1998;Aug 1; 247(2):223–31. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cornelissen M, Hogervorst E, Zorgdrager F, Hartman S, Goudsmit J. Maintenance of syncytium-inducing phenotype of HIV Type 1 Is Associated with Positively Charged Residues in the HIV Type 1 gp120 V2 Domain without Fixed Positions, Elongation, or Relocated N-Linked Glycosylation Sites. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1995;Oct; 11(10):1169–75. doi: 10.1089/aid.1995.11.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bernthsen A, Bansal RK. A textbook of organic chemistry. New Age Intl. 2003.
- 14. Influenza Virus Resource. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/ [2010 Dec 14]
- 15.Hale BG, Randall RE, Ortin J, Jackson D. The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J Gen Virol. 2008;Oct;89((Pt 10)):2359–76. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/004606-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rambaut A, Pybus OG, Nelson MI, Viboud C, Taubenberger JK, et al. The genomic and epidemiological dynamics of human influenza A virus. Nature May 29;453(7195):615-9. Epub. 2008;2008 Apr 16 doi: 10.1038/nature06945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ferguson NM, Galvani AP, Bush RM. Ecological and immunological determinants of influenza evolution. Nature. 2003;Mar 27; 422(6930):428–33. doi: 10.1038/nature01509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Using protein code 2VIU from the Protein Data Base, see www.pdb.org. Image was produced with PyMOL software.
- 19.Zhang M, Gaschen B, Blay W, Foley B, Haigwood N, et al. Tracking global patterns of N-linked glycosylation site variation in highly variable viral glycoproteins: HIV, SIV, and HCV envelopes and influenza hemagglutinin. Glycobiology Dec;14(12):1229-46. Epub. 2004;2004 Jun 2 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schulze IT. Effects of glycosylation on the properties and functions of influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Infect Dis. 1997;Aug;176 (Suppl 1):S24–8. doi: 10.1086/514170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cui J, Smith T, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. Darwinian selection for sites of Asn-linked glycosylation in phylogenetically disparate eukaryotes and viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Aug 11;106(32):13421-6. Epub. 2009;2009 Jul 28 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905818106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mir-Shekari SY Ashford DA, Harvery DJ, Dwek RA, Schulze IT. The glycosylation of the influenza A virus hemagglutinin by mammalian cells. A site-specific study. J Biol Chem. 1997;Feb 14; 272(7):4027–36. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang CC, Chen JR, Tsent YC, Hsu CH, Hung YF, et al. Glycans on influenza hemagglutinin affect receptor binding and immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Oct 27;106(43):18137-42. Epub. 2009;Oct 12 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909696106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wagner R, Heuer D, Wolff T, Herwig A, Klenk H-D. N-Glycans attached to the stem domain of haemagglutinin efficiently regulate influenza A virus replication. J Gen Virol. 2002;Mar;83(Pt 3):601–9. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-3-601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blackburne B, Hay AJ, Goldstein RA. Changing selective pressure during antigenic changes in human influenza H3. PLoS Pathog. 2008;May 2; 4(5):e1000058. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Choi YK, Lee JH, Erickson G, Goyal SM, Soo HS, et al. H3N2 influenza virus transmission from swine to turkeys, United States. Emerg Infect Dis Dec; 2004;10(12):2156–60. doi: 10.3201/eid1012.040581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang Y, Lee CW, Zhang Y, Senne DA, Dearth R, et al. Isolation and characterization of H3N2 influenza A virus from turkeys. Avian Dis Jun; 2005;49(2):207–13. doi: 10.1637/7288-101304R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.