Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Biology of the Cell logoLink to Molecular Biology of the Cell
. 1995 Dec;6(12):1843–1859. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.12.1843

Localization and possible functions of Drosophila septins.

H Fares 1, M Peifer 1, J R Pringle 1
PMCID: PMC301337  PMID: 8590810

Abstract

The septins are a family of homologous proteins that were originally identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where they are associated with the "neck filaments" and are involved in cytokinesis and other aspects of the organization of the cell surface. We report here the identification of Sep1, a Drosophila melanogaster septin, based on its homology to the yeast septins. The predicted Sep1 amino acid sequence is 35-42% identical to the known S. cerevisiae septins; 52% identical to Pnut, a second D. melanogaster septin; and 53-73% identical to the known mammalian septins. Sep1-specific antibodies have been used to characterize its expression and localization. The protein is concentrated at the leading edge of the cleavage furrows of dividing cells and cellularizing embryos, suggesting a role in furrow formation. Other aspects of Sep1 localization suggest roles not directly related to cytokinesis. For example, Sep1 exhibits orderly, cell-cycle-coordinated rearrangements within the cortex of syncytial blastoderm embryos and in the cells of post-gastrulation embryos; Sep1 is also concentrated at the leading edge of the epithelium during dorsal closure in the embryo, in the neurons of the embryonic nervous system, and at the baso-lateral surfaces of ovarian follicle cells. The distribution of Sep1 typically overlaps, but is distinct from, that of actin. Both immunolocalization and biochemical experiments show that Sep1 is intimately associated with Pnut, suggesting that the Drosophila septins, like those in yeast, function as part of a complex.

Full text

PDF
1843

Images in this article

1847Image
on p.1847
1848Image
on p.1848
1848Image
on p.1848
1850Image
on p.1850
1852Image
on p.1852
1853Image
on p.1853
1854Image
on p.1854
1855Image
on p.1855
1856Image
on p.1856

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beltzer J. P., Chang L. F., Hinkkanen A. E., Kohlhaw G. B. Structure of yeast LEU4. The 5' flanking region contains features that predict two modes of control and two productive translation starts. J Biol Chem. 1986 Apr 15;261(11):5160–5167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byers B., Goetsch L. A highly ordered ring of membrane-associated filaments in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jun;69(3):717–721. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.3.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byers T. J., Armstrong P. B. Membrane protein redistribution during Xenopus first cleavage. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2176–2184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carthew R. W., Rubin G. M. seven in absentia, a gene required for specification of R7 cell fate in the Drosophila eye. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):561–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90452-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castrillon D. H., Wasserman S. A. Diaphanous is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila and shares domains of similarity with the products of the limb deformity gene. Development. 1994 Dec;120(12):3367–3377. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.12.3367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chant J., Mischke M., Mitchell E., Herskowitz I., Pringle J. R. Role of Bud3p in producing the axial budding pattern of yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(3):767–778. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dever T. E., Glynias M. J., Merrick W. C. GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1814–1818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DiDomenico B. J., Brown N. H., Lupisella J., Greene J. R., Yanko M., Koltin Y. Homologs of the yeast neck filament associated genes: isolation and sequence analysis of Candida albicans CDC3 and CDC10. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Mar;242(6):689–698. doi: 10.1007/BF00283424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fehon R. G., Dawson I. A., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. A Drosophila homologue of membrane-skeleton protein 4.1 is associated with septate junctions and is encoded by the coracle gene. Development. 1994 Mar;120(3):545–557. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.3.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Field C. M., Alberts B. M. Anillin, a contractile ring protein that cycles from the nucleus to the cell cortex. J Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;131(1):165–178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flescher E. G., Madden K., Snyder M. Components required for cytokinesis are important for bud site selection in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;122(2):373–386. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ford S. K., Pringle J. R. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC11 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. Dev Genet. 1991;12(4):281–292. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020120405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gould S. J., Subramani S., Scheffler I. E. Use of the DNA polymerase chain reaction for homology probing: isolation of partial cDNA or genomic clones encoding the iron-sulfur protein of succinate dehydrogenase from several species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1934–1938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haarer B. K., Pringle J. R. Immunofluorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm filaments in the mother-bud neck. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3678–3687. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartwell L. H. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Dec;69(2):265–276. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90223-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene. 1984 Jun;28(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hime G., Saint R. Zygotic expression of the pebble locus is required for cytokinesis during the postblastoderm mitoses of Drosophila. Development. 1992 Jan;114(1):165–171. doi: 10.1242/dev.114.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holaway B. L., Kao G., Finn M. C., Clancy M. J. Transcriptional regulation of sporulation genes in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Dec;210(3):449–459. doi: 10.1007/BF00327196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaback D. B., Feldberg L. R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits a sporulation-specific temporal pattern of transcript accumulation. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;5(4):751–761. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.4.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Karess R. E., Chang X. J., Edwards K. A., Kulkarni S., Aguilera I., Kiehart D. P. The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1177–1189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90013-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karr T. L., Alberts B. M. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kato Kikuya. A Collection of cDNA Clones with Specific Expression Patterns in Mouse Brain. Eur J Neurosci. 1990;2(8):704–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katoh K., Ichikawa H., Ishikawa H. Electron microscopic visualization of actin filaments in the early embryo of Drosophila melanogaster: the use of phalloidin and tropomyosin. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1991 Feb;40(1):70–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiehart D. P., Feghali R. Cytoplasmic myosin from Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1517–1525. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim H. B., Haarer B. K., Pringle J. R. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):535–544. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koerner T. J., Hill J. E., Myers A. M., Tzagoloff A. High-expression vectors with multiple cloning sites for construction of trpE fusion genes: pATH vectors. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:477–490. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94036-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar S., Tomooka Y., Noda M. Identification of a set of genes with developmentally down-regulated expression in the mouse brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Jun 30;185(3):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91747-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lehner C. F. The pebble gene is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 1992 Dec;103(Pt 4):1021–1030. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.4.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Loncar D., Singer S. J. Cell membrane formation during the cellularization of the syncytial blastoderm of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):2199–2203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lupas A., Van Dyke M., Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1162–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maina C. V., Riggs P. D., Grandea A. G., 3rd, Slatko B. E., Moran L. S., Tagliamonte J. A., McReynolds L. A., Guan C. D. An Escherichia coli vector to express and purify foreign proteins by fusion to and separation from maltose-binding protein. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):365–373. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller K. G., Field C. M., Alberts B. M. Actin-binding proteins from Drosophila embryos: a complex network of interacting proteins detected by F-actin affinity chromatography. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):2963–2975. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mount S. M., Burks C., Hertz G., Stormo G. D., White O., Fields C. Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Aug 25;20(16):4255–4262. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.16.4255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakatsuru S., Sudo K., Nakamura Y. Molecular cloning of a novel human cDNA homologous to CDC10 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Jul 15;202(1):82–87. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Neufeld T. P., Rubin G. M. The Drosophila peanut gene is required for cytokinesis and encodes a protein similar to yeast putative bud neck filament proteins. Cell. 1994 May 6;77(3):371–379. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90152-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nottenburg C., Gallatin W. M., St John T. Lymphocyte HEV adhesion variants differ in the expression of multiple gene sequences. Gene. 1990 Nov 15;95(2):279–284. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Orsulic S., Peifer M. A method to stain nuclei of Drosophila for confocal microscopy. Biotechniques. 1994 Mar;16(3):441–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peifer M., Orsulic S., Sweeton D., Wieschaus E. A role for the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal integrity during oogenesis. Development. 1993 Aug;118(4):1191–1207. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.4.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Peifer M., Sweeton D., Casey M., Wieschaus E. wingless signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase trigger opposing changes in the intracellular distribution of Armadillo. Development. 1994 Feb;120(2):369–380. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Peifer M. The product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is part of a multi-protein complex resembling the vertebrate adherens junction. J Cell Sci. 1993 Aug;105(Pt 4):993–1000. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.4.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peifer M., Wieschaus E. The segment polarity gene armadillo encodes a functionally modular protein that is the Drosophila homolog of human plakoglobin. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1167–1176. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90413-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pesacreta T. C., Byers T. J., Dubreuil R., Kiehart D. P., Branton D. Drosophila spectrin: the membrane skeleton during embryogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1989 May;108(5):1697–1709. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.5.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Planques V., Warn A., Warn R. M. The effects of microinjection of rhodamine-phalloidin on mitosis and cytokinesis in early stage Drosophila embryos. Exp Cell Res. 1991 Feb;192(2):557–566. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Poole S. J., Kauvar L. M., Drees B., Kornberg T. The engrailed locus of Drosophila: structural analysis of an embryonic transcript. Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):37–43. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90306-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Postner M. A., Miller K. G., Wieschaus E. F. Maternal effect mutations of the sponge locus affect actin cytoskeletal rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;119(5):1205–1218. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.5.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Postner M. A., Wieschaus E. F. The nullo protein is a component of the actin-myosin network that mediates cellularization in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Cell Sci. 1994 Jul;107(Pt 7):1863–1873. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.7.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pringle J. R., Preston R. A., Adams A. E., Stearns T., Drubin D. G., Haarer B. K., Jones E. W. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;31:357–435. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61620-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Salmon E. D. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;1(3):541–547. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(89)90018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sanders S. L., Field C. M. Cell division. Septins in common? Curr Biol. 1994 Oct 1;4(10):907–910. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Saraste M., Sibbald P. R., Wittinghofer A. The P-loop--a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Nov;15(11):430–434. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Satterwhite L. L., Pollard T. D. Cytokinesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;4(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90057-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schejter E. D., Rose L. S., Postner M. A., Wieschaus E. Role of the zygotic genome in the restructuring of the actin cytoskeleton at the cycle-14 transition during Drosophila embryogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1992;57:653–659. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1992.057.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schejter E. D., Wieschaus E. Functional elements of the cytoskeleton in the early Drosophila embryo. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1993;9:67–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schejter E. D., Wieschaus E. bottleneck acts as a regulator of the microfilament network governing cellularization of the Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1993 Oct 22;75(2):373–385. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80078-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schweisguth F., Lepesant J. A., Vincent A. The serendipity alpha gene encodes a membrane-associated protein required for the cellularization of the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 1990 Jun;4(6):922–931. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.6.922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Seeger M., Tear G., Ferres-Marco D., Goodman C. S. Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline. Neuron. 1993 Mar;10(3):409–426. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90330-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Simpson L., Wieschaus E. Zygotic activity of the nullo locus is required to stabilize the actin-myosin network during cellularization in Drosophila. Development. 1990 Nov;110(3):851–863. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.3.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Slater M. L., Bowers B., Cabib E. Formation of septum-like structures at locations remote from the budding sites in cytokinesis-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1985 May;162(2):763–767. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.2.763-767.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sullivan W., Fogarty P., Theurkauf W. Mutations affecting the cytoskeletal organization of syncytial Drosophila embryos. Development. 1993 Aug;118(4):1245–1254. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.4.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sullivan W., Minden J. S., Alberts B. M. daughterless-abo-like, a Drosophila maternal-effect mutation that exhibits abnormal centrosome separation during the late blastoderm divisions. Development. 1990 Oct;110(2):311–323. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.2.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Theurkauf W. E., Smiley S., Wong M. L., Alberts B. M. Reorganization of the cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis: implications for axis specification and intercellular transport. Development. 1992 Aug;115(4):923–936. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.4.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas G. H., Kiehart D. P. Beta heavy-spectrin has a restricted tissue and subcellular distribution during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):2039–2050. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Warn R. M., Gutzeit H. O., Smith L., Warn A. F-actin rings are associated with the ring canals of the Drosophila egg chamber. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Apr;157(2):355–363. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Warn R. M., Magrath R. F-actin distribution during the cellularization of the Drosophila embryo visualized with FL-phalloidin. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Jan;143(1):103–114. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90113-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Warn R. M., Magrath R., Webb S. Distribution of F-actin during cleavage of the Drosophila syncytial blastoderm. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):156–162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wieschaus E., Sweeton D. Requirements for X-linked zygotic gene activity during cellularization of early Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Nov;104(3):483–493. doi: 10.1242/dev.104.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Young P. E., Pesacreta T. C., Kiehart D. P. Dynamic changes in the distribution of cytoplasmic myosin during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. 1991 Jan;111(1):1–14. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Young P. E., Richman A. M., Ketchum A. S., Kiehart D. P. Morphogenesis in Drosophila requires nonmuscle myosin heavy chain function. Genes Dev. 1993 Jan;7(1):29–41. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

RESOURCES