Abstract
Background
Two subtypes of sigma (σ) receptors, σ1 and σ2, can be pharmacologically distinguished, and each may be involved in substance-abuse disorders. σ-receptor antagonists block cocaine place conditioning and σ-receptor agonists are self-administered in rats that previously self-administered cocaine. Self-administration has been related to increased dopamine (DA) neurotransmission for different drug classes. Actions of σ-receptor agonists on mesolimbic DA have not been fully characterized.
Methods
Receptor-binding studies assessed affinities of different σ-receptor ligands for σ-receptor subtypes, and for the DA transporter; effects on DA transmission in the rat nucleus accumbens shell were assessed using in-vivo microdialysis.
Results
Cocaine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg i.v.), the non-selective σ1/2-receptor agonist DTG (1.0–5.6 mg/kg i.v.), and the selective σ1-receptor agonist PRE-084 (0.32–10 mg/kg i.v.) dose-dependently increased DA, with maxima of about 275, 150, and 160%, respectively. DTG-induced stimulation of DA was antagonized by the nonselective σ1/2-receptor antagonist, BD 1008 (10 mg/kg i.p.), and by the preferential σ2-receptor antagonist SN79 (1–3 mg/kg i.p.), but not by the preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, BD 1063 (10–30 mg/kg i.p.). Neither PRE-084 nor cocaine was antagonized by either BD1063 or BD1008.
Conclusions
Stimulation of DA by σ-receptor agonists in a brain area involved in the reinforcing effects of cocaine was demonstrated. The effects appear to be mediated by σ2-receptors rather than σ1-receptors. However σ-receptors are not likely involved in mediating the acute cocaine- and PRE-084-induced stimulation of DA transmission. Different mechanisms might underlie the dopaminergic and reinforcing effects of σ-receptor agonists suggesting a dopamine-independent reinforcing pathway that may contribute to substance-abuse disorders.
Keywords: abuse liability, addiction, cocaine, dopamine microdialysis, nucleus accumbens, reinforcing effects, sigma receptors
Introduction
Sigma (σ) receptors, initially proposed as opioid (1) and later phencyclidine (PCP) receptors (2), were demonstrated to represent a unique binding site in the mammalian brain and peripheral organs (3–5), and are expressed throughout the central nervous system. The σ-receptor system has been implicated in a variety of physiological functions and disease states (6).
Pharmacological and structural studies distinguished two receptor subtypes: sigma 1 (σ1) and sigma 2 (σ2) (5, 7). The σ1 receptor was cloned and characterized as a 29 kDa single polypeptide having no homology with any other known mammalian proteins (8). In contrast, the σ2 receptor is an 18–21 kDa protein that has not yet been cloned (9). σ1 receptors possess two transmembrane domains and have been localized subcellularly at the endoplasmic reticulum. It has been suggested that, after stimulation by sigma ligands, σ1 receptors translocate to the plasma membrane (10).
Several classes of compounds, including neurosteroids, neuroleptics, dextrobenzomorphans, and psychostimulants, such as methamphetamine and cocaine, have been shown to bind to σ receptors (11, 12). The psychomotor stimulant and reinforcing effects of cocaine are primarily mediated through stimulation of dopamine (DA) neurotransmission by inhibiting DA reuptake. However, its moderate affinity for σ receptors (13–15), suggests that cocaine-induced effects could involve actions at σ1- and/or σ2-receptor subtypes (16). Consequently, studies have examined the effects of σ-receptor ligands on various effects of cocaine related to its abuse (see reviews by 11, 17, 18). For example, σ-receptor antagonists blocked the locomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine (19–22), and the development of cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization (22, 23). Further, σ-receptor antagonists attenuated cocaine-induced place conditioning (24), thought these compounds failed to substantially alter cocaine self-administration (25, 26), indicating that σ receptors are not directly involved in the direct reinforcing effects of cocaine. However, the preferential σ1-receptor antagonist BD 1047 attenuated the reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced behavior induced by cocaine-related stimuli, suggesting that σ receptors might be involved in brain mechanisms and behavioral activities that trigger cocaine use. Finally, several σ-receptor antagonists can block or attenuate acute cocaine-induced toxicities, such as convulsions and lethality (13). Together, these studies suggest that σ1 receptors participate in the mechanisms of action of cocaine, and that σ-receptor antagonists might be potentially useful as medications for treating cocaine abuse, dependence, and overdose (24, 27).
Recently Hiranita and colleagues (26) showed reinforcing effects of σ-receptor agonists in rats trained to self-administer cocaine. Reinforcing effects of most drugs of abuse appear to be mediated by stimulation of DA transmission, and it has been repeatedly shown that the acute effects of drugs abused by humans at doses able to maintain self-administration in rodents, preferentially or selectively increase DA transmission in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell as compared to the NAc core or dorsal striatum (28–30). Increases in DA transmission induced by non-selective σ-receptor agonists have been reported (31, 32), though contrasting results and sometime biphasic effects have been reported after systemic or local intrastriatal administration (33–36). Thus, the goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that intravenous (i.v.) administration of σ-receptor agonists would increase DA transmission in the NAc shell. To this end, rats were implanted with microdialysis probes in the NAc shell and effects of various i.v. doses of DTG, a non-selective σ-receptor agonist, and PRE-084, a selective σ1-receptor agonist, on extracellular DA levels were compared to the effects of i.v. cocaine. In addition, the effects of the σ-receptor agonists as well as cocaine were studied in combination with σ-receptor antagonists to confirm the pharmacological specificity of the effect. σ-receptor ligands were also studied in binding experiments to test their affinities for σ1- and σ2-receptor subtypes as well as the DA transporter (DAT), the main pharmacologic target of cocaine.
METHODS
Sigma 1 and sigma 2 Receptor Binding
Frozen whole guinea-pig brains (minus cerebellum) were used and processed as already published (37)(see also Supplement for complete details). The guinea pig brains were preferred over rat brains due to their use as a standard for sigma receptor binding because of the relatively higher density of those receptors in that tissue compared to rat (38). Ligand binding experiments were conducted for σ1-receptor studies with 3 nM [3H]pentazocine (specific activity 28 Ci/mmol) and 8.0 mg tissue. Nonspecific binding was determined using 10 μM haloperidol. For σ2-receptor studies, each tube contained 3 nM [3H]DTG (specific activity 48 Ci/mmol), 200 nM (+)-pentazocine, and 8.0 mg tissue. Nonspecific binding was determined using 100 μM haloperidol.
DAT Binding
Brains from male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200–225 g (Taconic Labs) were used, and experiments were carried out as published previously (39). Binding was assessed with 0.5 nM [3H]WIN 35428 (specific activity 84 Ci/mmol) and 1.0 mg striatal tissue. Nonspecific binding was determined using 0.1 mM cocaine HCl.
In-vivo microdialysis studies
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River, Germantown, MD, USA), weighing 275 to 350 g served as subjects, and all methods were as described previously (30, 40–42) (see details in Supplement). Rats were doubly housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on: 07:00–19:00 hour) and had free access to food and water. Experiments were conducted during the light phase.
Surgical procedures were conducted under a mixture of ketamine and xylazine (60.0 and 12.0 mg/kg ip, respectively) anesthesia. Rats were first implanted with a silastic catheter into the external jugular vein, with the catheter exiting the skin at the back between the shoulders. Rats were then placed in a stereotaxic apparatus, and implanted with concentric dialysis probes aimed at the NAc shell [uncorrected coordinates from the rat brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (43): Anterior = +2.0 mm from bregma, Lateral = ±1.0 mm from bregma, Vertical = −7.9 mm from dura,]. The histological confirmations of probe placement are included in the Supplement.
Experiments were performed on freely moving rats, about 22–24 hours after probe implant. Dialysate was sampled every 10 min and immediately analyzed. After stable DA values (less than 10% variability) were obtained for at least three consecutive samples (after about 1–2 hours), rats were treated with one dose of one of the test drugs (cocaine, DTG, PRE-084, or saline), or with an antagonist (BD 1008, BD 1063, or SN79) followed 30 (or 10 for SN 79) min later by saline or one of the test drugs. Different groups of naïve rats were used for each different treatment. In another series of experiments in different groups of naïve rats, after obtaining stable DA levels, microdialysis probes were perfused with calcium-free Ringer’s solution for 60 min before i.v. injections of DTG or PRE-084 (44, 45).
Dopamine was detected in dialysate samples by HPLC coupled with a coulometric detector (5200a Coulochem II, or Coulochem III, ESA). The average basal DA values in dialysates from the NAc shell in the present experiments were 42.3±1.0 fmoles (±S.E.M.) in a 10 μl sample, n=171. No significant differences were found in basal DA concentrations from the different experimental groups (ANOVA, F(30,140)=0.516, P=0.98).
Drugs
The following were used: (−)-cocaine hydrochloride (0.1–1.0 mg/kg i.v.), the mixed σ1/2R agonist, DTG (1.0–5.6 mg/kg i.v.), the selective σ1R agonist, PRE-084 (0.32–5.6 mg/kg i.v.), the preferential σ1R) antagonist, BD 1063 (10–30 mg/kg ip), the mixed σ1/2R antagonist, BD 1008 (10–30 mg/kg ip), and the preferential σ2R antagonist, SN79 (1–3 mg/kg i.p. (synthesized at the Department of Medicinal Chemistry at the University of Mississippi, (18, 46). Chemical names, sources of the compounds, their preparation and dose selection rationale are provided in the Supplement.
Data analysis
Data from the in vitro binding studies were fit by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism 5.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA). The fits of data for DTG displacement of [3H[DTG were globally fit to one- or two-site homologous competition models. Because those data were better fit (F test) to a two-site model, competition studies of all drugs tested for displacement of [3H[DTG were compared for global fits to both one- and two-site models for heterologous competition, with data for the best fit reported. The fits of displacement data against the other ligands were consistent with a single site model, and therefore single affinities are reported.
Results of in-vivo microdialysis studies were expressed as a percentage of basal DA values, which were calculated as means of the three consecutive samples preceding the test drug or saline injection, with results presented as group means (±S.E.M.). Statistical analysis (Statistica software, Stat Soft, Tulsa, OK) was carried out using one-, two-, or three-way ANOVA for repeated measures over time, with drug dose, time, and antagonist pretreatments as factors. Significant results were followed by post-hoc Tukey’s tests. Changes were considered significant when p<0.05.
RESULTS
In vitro binding experiments
As has been previously reported (47, 48), DTG and PRE-084 had high affinity for σ receptors. The homologous competition of DTG modeled better for two than one binding site (Table 1). The high affinity binding Kd value of 21.9 nM is comparable to that reported previously for σ2 receptors in the papers cited above, and indicates a two- to three-fold selectivity for σ2 over σ1 receptors, as also reported previously. In contrast, PRE-084 had a high affinity for σ1 receptors (53.2 nM), and was approximately 600-fold selective for this site over σ2 receptors. Among the σ-receptor antagonists tested, BD 1008 had the highest affinity for both σ1 receptors and σ2 receptors; however, this compound was the least selective of the antagonists tested. The σ-receptor antagonist BD 1047 had approximately the same affinity for σ1 receptors as BD 1008 did but had lower affinity at σ2 receptors. BD 1063 had lower affinity at both σ1 receptors and σ2 receptors but was the most selective of the three for the σ1 receptor. None of the compounds except cocaine had high affinity for the DAT, and that affinity was approximately 70-fold greater than its affinity for the σ1 receptor (Table 1).
Table 1.
Affinities of various σ-receptor ligands and cocaine on binding to σ1, σ2-receptor subtypes and to the DAT as labeled with [3H](+)-pentazocine, [3H]DTG, and [3H]WIN 35,428, respectively.
| Compound | σ1 Ki Value (nM) | σ2 Ki Value (nM) | σ2/σ1 | DAT Ki Value (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTG* | 57.4 (49.3 – 66.7) | 21.9 (14.8 – 32.4) 3520 (257 – 48200) |
0.382 | 93,500 (80,000 – 109,000) |
| PRE-084 | 53.2 (44.8 – 63.2) | 32,100 (23,100 – 44,700) | 603 | 19,600 (17,600 – 21,900) |
| BD 1008 | 2.13 (1.77 – 2.56) | 16.6 (13.0 – 21.1) 20,500 (9,640 – 43,500) |
7.79 | 2,510 (2,250 – 2,790) |
| BD 1047 | 3.13 (2.68 – 3.65) | 47.5 (36.7 – 61.4) 55,300 (25,000 – 122,000) |
15.2 | 3,220 (2,820 – 3,670) |
| BD 1063 | 8.81 (7.15 – 10.9) | 625 (447 – 877) 53,700 (16,500 – 174,000) |
70.9 | 8,020 (7,100 – 9,060) |
| Cocaine | 5,190 (3,800 – 7,060) | 19,300 (16,000 – 23,300) | 3.72 | 76.6 (72.6 – 80.5) |
Values for σ2 receptors are Kd values obtained by homologous competition experiments.
In vivo microdialysis experiments
Administration of cocaine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly increased extracellular levels of DA within the first 10 min after injection to values approximating 275% of baseline levels at the highest dose tested. [Two-way ANOVA gave main effects of cocaine dose: F(2,16)=3.73, p<0.05, time: F(6,96)=17.8, p<0.001; and dose-by-time interaction: F(12,96)=3.53, p<0.001]. Stimulation of DA levels was transient, and levels of DA approached basal levels within 50 min after injection of the highest dose (Figure 1A). The effects of cocaine obtained in the first 30 min after injection were significant, and directly related to dose (Figure 1B). [Two-way ANOVA showed significant main effects of dose: F(2,16)=4.58, p<0.05; time: F(3,48)=22.7, p<0.001; and dose-by-time interaction: F(6,48)=4.14, p<0.001].
Figure 1.
Effects of i.v. administration of cocaine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) on DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panel A shows the time course of effects of different cocaine doses; panel B shows the average change in DA levels, related to cocaine doses, obtained in the first 30 min after cocaine injection. Results are means, with vertical bars representing S.E.M., of the amount of DA in 10-min dialysate samples, expressed as percentage of basal values (panel A) or of the average of DA values during the first 30 min after cocaine injection calculated as percentage of basal values (panel B). Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 36.9 ± 6.4 (4), 45.5 ± 6.5 (8), and 44.8 ± 6.8 (7) for cocaine 0.1, 0.32, and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively. *=p < 0.05 compared to corresponding basal DA values.
Administration of the non-selective σ-receptor agonist DTG (1.0–5.6 mg/kg i.v.) transiently and significantly increased DA levels, with values returning to the non-stimulated baseline levels within approximately 45 min after administration (Figure 2A). [Two-way ANOVA gave significant main effects of dose: F(2,18)=6.76, p<0.01; time: (F(6,108)=5.58, p<0.001; and dose-by-time interaction: F(12,108)=4.15, p<0.001]. Maximal effects of the highest (5.6 mg/kg) dose were observed within 10 min after injection whereas the maximal effects of 3.2 mg/kg were observed at the 20 min sampling time. The effects of DTG in the first 30 min, as with cocaine, show a linear increase over the dose range studied (Figure 2B). Maximal increases in DA concentration were obtained at 5.6 mg/kg which was approximately 50% of the effect obtained with the highest dose of cocaine studied. At higher doses, DTG produced signs of acute toxicity. At the doses tested, DTG was less potent than cocaine. The selective σ1-receptor agonist, PRE-084 (0.32–10 mg/kg i.v.), also increased DA levels and the effect was significant at the highest dose tested (Figure 2C). [Two-way ANOVA gave significant main effects of dose: F(4,17)=3.94, p<0.02, time: F(9,153)=5.96, p<0.001; and dose-by-time interaction: F(36,153)=4.32, p<0.001]. The maximal increase in DA levels obtained with the 10 mg/kg dose of PRE-084 was about 170% of basal values at 10 min after administration (Figure 2D).
Figure 2.
Effects of i.v. administration of the non-selective σ1/2-receptor agonist DTG (1–5.6 mg/kg), and the selective σ1-receptor agonist PRE-084 (0.32–10.0 mg/kg), on DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panels A and C show the time course of the administration of different doses of DTG and PRE-084, respectively; panels B and D show the changes in DA levels, related to drug doses, obtained during the first 30 min after DTG or PRE-084 injections, respectively. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 41.3 ± 5.4 (8), 42.2 ± 6.4 (7), and 52.5 ± 3.0 (6) for DTG 1.0, 3.2, and 5.6 mg/kg, respectively; and were: 51.9 ± 7.5 (4), 45.5 ± 5.1 (5), 43.4 ± 9.8 (5), 40.0 ± 3.6 (4), and 35.8 ± 6.9 (4) for PRE-084 0.32, 1.0, 3.2, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. See figure 1 legend for other details.
The preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, BD 1063 (10–30 mg/kg i.p.), administered alone induced a small, transient (<30 min) non-significant increase in DA levels of about 30%, and a later small decrease in DA levels to about 80% of baseline (Figure 3A and B, open squares). A 30-min pretreatment with the preferential σ1-receptor antagonist BD 1063 did not significantly alter the time course of 5.6 mg/kg of DTG (Figure 3A and 3B), nor its maximal effects (Figure 3C). [Three-way ANOVA gave significant main effects of DTG treatment: F(1,30)=7.07, p<0.05, time: F(6,180)=9.40, p<0.001; and the DTG-treatment-by-time interaction: F(6,180)=11.4, p<0.001). In addition non-significant effects of BD1063 pretreatment: F(2,30)=1.39; and the interactions of DTG-treatment-by-BD1063-pretreatment: F(2,30)=0.035; BD1063-pretreatment-by- time: F(12,180)=1.05; and DTG-treatment-by-BD1063-pretreatment-by-time: F(12,180)=0.420 were obtained].
Figure 3.

Effects of pretreatments with BD 1063 (10–30 mg/kg i.p.), a preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, on DTG-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panels A and B show the time course of effects of BD 1063 injected 30 min before the most effective dose of DTG, 5.6 mg/kg i.v.; panel C shows the same data expressed as the average change in DA levels obtained in the first 30 min after DTG injection. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 44.6 ± 7.9 (8), and 39.5 ± 2.5 (6) for BD 1063 10 mg/kg + saline or + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, respectively, and 47.9 ± 2.6 (7), and 47.3 ± 1.6 (5), for BD 1063 30 mg/kg + saline or + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, respectively. See figure 1 legend for other details.
The non-selective σ-receptor antagonist, BD 1008 (10 mg/kg i.p.) had no immediate effects of its own (Figure 4A and B, open squares), though modest decreases in DA levels were obtained over the 2 hr observation period to levels approximating 75% of basal control values at 2 hr after injection. BD 1008 pretreatment significantly attenuated the effects of 5.6 mg/kg of DTG (Figure 4A) and completely blocked the effects of 3.2 mg/kg of DTG (Figure 4B, C). [Three-way ANOVA gave main effects of DTG treatment: F(2,31)=3.39, p<0.05; BD1008-pretreatment: F(1,31)=15.5, p<0.001; time: F(6,186)=10.0, p<0.001; and the interactions of DTG-treatment-by- time: F(12,186)=2.97, p<0.001; BD1008-pretreatment-by-time: F(6,186)=4.20, p<0.001; DTG-by-BD1008-by-time: F(12,186)=1.90, p<0.05; though a non significant interaction of DTG-treatment-by-BD1008-pretreatment: F(2,31)=0.103].
Figure 4.

Effects of pretreatment with BD 1008, a non-selective σ1/2-receptor antagonist (10mg/kg i.p.), on DTG-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panels A and B show the time course of 10 mg/kg i.p. of BD 1008 effects on DA levels stimulated by different doses of DTG, 5.6 and 3.2 mg/kg i.v., respectively. BD 1008 was administered 30 min before DTG; panel C shows the same data expressed as the average change in DA levels, related to DTG doses, obtained during the first 30 min after DTG administration. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 32.3 ± 7.0 (6), 49.5 ± 7.9 (6), and 49.0 ± 8.1 (7) for BD 1008 10 mg/kg + Saline, BD 1008 10 mg/kg + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, and BD 1008 10 mg/kg + DTG 3.2 mg/kg, respectively. #=p < 0.05 compared with the corresponding time point of administration of BD 1008 10 mg/kg + DTG 5.6 mg/kg (panel A and C), or BD 1008 10 mg/kg + DTG 3.2 mg/kg (panel B). See figure 1 legend for other details.
The preferential σ2-receptor antagonist, SN79 (18, 46), administered alone (1–3 mg/kg i.p.) did not significantly modify extracellular levels of DA up to 100 min after its administration (Figure 5A, B). However, SN79 pretreatment dose-dependently and significantly antagonized the effects of 3.2 and 5.6 mg/kg of DTG (Figure 5A, B). [Three-way ANOVA gave significant main effects of DTG: F(2,32)=3.72, p<0.05; SN79-pretreatment: F(1,32)=12.4, p<0.005; time: F(3,96)=10.9, p<0.001; and the interactions of DTG-treatment-by-time: F(6,96)=5.93, p<0.001; SN79-pretreatment-by-time: F(3,96)=2.80, p<0.05; and DTG-treatment-by-SN79-pretreatment-by-time: F(6,96)=2.50, p<0.05. The interaction of DTG-by-SN79-pretreatment was not significant: F(2,32)=2.810, p=0.07]. Over the range of DTG doses studied, 1.0 mg/kg of SN79 significantly antagonized the effects of DTG (Figure 5C).
Figure 5.

Effects of pretreatment with SN79, a preferential σ2-receptor antagonist (1–3 mg/kg i.p.), on DTG-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panel A shows the time course of 1–3 mg/kg i.p. of SN79 effects on DA levels stimulated by DTG, 5.6 mg/kg i.v., injected 10 min after SN79, while panel B shows the effects of SN79 pretreatment on DA levels stimulated by DTG, 3.2 mg/kg i.v., under the same experimental conditions. Panel C shows the same data expressed as the average change in DA levels, related to DTG doses, obtained during the first 30 min after DTG administration. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 37.5 ± 4.1 (5), 28.5 ± 7.0 (6), 51.9 ± 9.9 (6), 50.0 ± 4.6 (6), and 42.3 ± 4.2 (6) for SN79 3 mg/kg + saline, SN79 3 mg/kg + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, SN79 1 mg/kg + saline, SN79 1 mg/kg + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, and SN79 1 mg/kg + DTG 3.2 mg/kg, respectively. #=p < 0.05 compared with the corresponding time point of administration of SN 79 + DTG 5.6 mg/kg (panels A and C), or SN79 + DTG 3.2 mg/kg (panel B). See figure 1 legend for other details.
A 30-min pretreatment with the preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, BD 1063 (10 mg/kg i.p.), had no significant effects of its own and did not significantly modify PRE-084-induced stimulation of DA transmission in the NAc shell (Figure 6A). [Two-way ANOVA gave a main effect of time: F(9,54)=10.181, p<0.001; but no significant effects of BD1063-pretreatment: F(1,6)=0.025; or BD1063-pretreatment-by-time interaction: F(9,54)=0.517]. Similarly, the non-selective σ-receptor antagonist BD 1008 (10–30 mg/kg i.p.) did not significantly modify PRE-084-induced stimulation of DA transmission in the NAc shell (Figure 6, panel B). [Two-way ANOVA gave a significant main effect of time: F(9,81)=26.775, p<0.001; but no significant effects of BD1008-pretreatment: F(2,9)=0.971, or BD1008-pretreatment-by-time interaction: F(18,81)=0.498].
Figure 6.
Effects of pretreatment with BD 1063 (10 mg/kg i.p.), a preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, and BD 1008 (10–30 mg/kg i.p), a non-selective σ1/2-receptor antagonist, on PRE-084-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panel A shows the time course of effects of a 30-min pretreatment dose, 10 mg/kg ip, of BD 1063 on DA levels stimulated by PRE-084, 10 mg/kg i.v.; Panel B shows the time course of the effects of 10 and 30 mg/kg ip doses of BD 1008 on DA levels stimulated by PRE-084, 10 mg/kg i.v. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 38.8 ± 2.2 (4), 38.5 ± 9.2 (4), and 33.1 ± 6.4 (4) for BD 1063 10 mg/kg + PRE-084 10 mg/kg, BD 1008 10 mg/kg + PRE-084 10 mg/kg, and BD 1008 30 mg/kg + PRE-084 10 mg/kg, respectively. See figure 1 legend for other details.
As with PRE-084, the effects of cocaine on stimulation of DA transmission were not significantly modified by pretreatments with either 10 mg/kg of BD 1063 or BD 1008 administered 30 min before (Figure 7, panels A and B). [Two-way ANOVAs conducted individually for each drug interaction gave significant main effects of time F(9,99)=19.609, p<0.001 (BD1063 and cocaine) or F(9,99)=11.357, p<0.001 (BD1008 and cocaine), but non significant effects of BD 1063 pretreatment: F(1,11)=0.028; and its interaction with time: F(9,99)=0.595; or BD 1008 pretreatment: F(1,11)=0.001; and its interaction with time: F(98,99)=0.568].
Figure 7.

Effects of pretreatment with BD 1063, 10 mg/kg ip (panel A), a preferential σ1-receptor antagonist, and BD 1008, 10 mg/kg ip (panel B), a non-selective σ1/2-receptor antagonist, on cocaine-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Both compounds were administered 30 min before the iv injection of a 0.32 mg/kg dose of cocaine. Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 39.1 ± 4.0 (5), and 39.2 ± 5.8 (6) for BD 1063 10 mg/kg + cocaine 0.32 mg/kg, and BD 1008 10 mg/kg + cocaine 0.32 mg/kg, respectively. See figure 1 legend for other details.
Local perfusion of the NAc shell with a calcium-free Ringer’s solution delivered by the microdialysis probe markedly decreased extracellular DA levels compared to basal levels collected with normal Ringer’s solution (Figure 8A, B). Decreases were apparent from the first sample after treatment, and the maximal decrease was to about 15–20% of basal control values obtained with normal Ringer’s solution (Figure 8A, B). Administration of vehicle (not shown), DTG (5.6 mg/kg), or PRE-084 (10 mg/kg) 60 min after the start of local perfusion with calcium-free Ringer’s solution did not significantly modify the low extracellular levels of DA (Figure 8A, B). [Two-way ANOVAs conducted individually for each drug gave significant main effects of time F(14,84)=75.0, p<0.001 (DTG) or F(14,84)=106, p<0.001 (PRE-084), but non-significant effects of DTG-treatment: F(1,6)=0.525; and its interaction with time: F(14,84)=0.760; or PRE-084-treatment: F(1,6)=0.655; and its interaction with time: F(14,84)=1.73].
Figure 8.
Effects of removal of calcium from the perfusion Ringer’s solution on DTG- and PRE-084-induced stimulation of DA levels in dialysates from the NAc shell in rats. Panels A and B show the time course of the different effects of administration of DTG or PRE-084, respectively, on stimulation of DA levels during perfusion of the microdialysis probes with normal Ringer’s solution or with a calcium-free Ringer’s solution. Microdialysis probes were perfused with calcium-free Ringer’s solution from 60 min before injection (−60 min) until the end of the experiment (solid line above the X axis). Solid circles show the lack of effects of DTG or PRE-084 on DA levels under these conditions, as compared to their significant effects on DA levels obtained with perfusion of regular Ringer’s solution (open circles). Basal DA values (fmoles/sample) and group size (n) were: 27.7 ± 5.8 (4), and 42.3 ± 2.8 (4) for calcium-free Ringer’s solution + PRE-084 10 mg/kg, and calcium-free Ringer’s solution + DTG 5.6 mg/kg, respectively. See figure 1 legend for other details.
DISCUSSION
A recent study with rodents on self-administration of the σ-receptor agonists, DTG and PRE-084 (26), prompted the present study of the effects of these drugs on DA levels in the NAc shell. The goal of the present study was to assess whether the effectiveness of DTG and PRE-084 in maintaining self-administration behavior would correspond with an increase in DA neurotransmission in the NAc shell after acute administration. This correspondence has been found with most drugs abused by humans (28–30) and is considered a biological substrate for drug abuse psychiatric disorders (49–51). We observed that acute i.v. administration of DTG, a non-selective σ-receptor agonist, as well as the selective σ1-receptor agonist, PRE-084, dose-dependently increased DA levels in the NAc shell. We found no previously published reports on the effects of selective σ1-receptor agonists, like PRE-084, on DA transmission in limbic areas. Contrasting effects of non selective σ-receptor agonists, like DTG, on DA neurotransmission in striatal areas have been reported, and inconsistency of the results shown in those studies may be related to procedural differences, for example, to local versus systemic administration of drugs, or anaesthetized versus awake animals (33–36).
The present study extends the validity of the correlation between stimulation of DA levels and maintenance of self-administration behavior to σ-receptor agonists, like DTG and PRE-084. However, although the effects of the non-selective agonist, DTG, on DA transmission were obtained within a range of doses that approximated the doses per injection that maintained self-administration in rats (26), the doses of the selective σ1-receptor agonist, PRE-084, that significantly increased DA levels were about 10 to 30 times higher than the doses per injection in the self-administration study. In addition, PRE-084 was about threefold more potent than DTG in the self-administration study (26) whereas it was less potent than DTG in increasing DA levels in the present study, suggesting that different mechanisms might underlie the dopaminergic and reinforcing effects of these σ-receptor agonists. To better understand the mechanisms underlying these differences, studies of antagonism were conducted with several σ-receptor antagonists.
The previously reported preferential σ1-receptor antagonist effects of BD 1063 (13) were confirmed in the present binding studies. When tested in microdialysis studies, BD 1063, up to 30 mg/kg, failed to antagonize the effects of any dose tested of DTG, or PRE-084, and cocaine. The lack of antagonism by the preferential σ1-receptor antagonist BD 1063 suggests that σ1 receptors are not involved in the acute effects of cocaine, PRE-084, and DTG on DA levels in the NAc shell. In contrast, the relatively non-selective σ1/2-receptor antagonist BD 1008 (20) significantly antagonized the acute effects of the non-selective σ1/2-receptor agonist DTG on DA transmission in the NAc shell.
In the present binding studies, BD 1008 was characterized as the least selective of the compounds assessed for affinity at σ-receptor subtypes, but nonetheless had higher affinity for σ1 than σ2 receptors. We therefore examined the antagonism of the effects of DTG by the preferential σ2-receptor antagonist SN79 (18, 20, 46). As with BD 1008, the DTG effects were antagonized by this novel preferential σ2-receptor antagonist. Thus the results with SN79 confirm the results with BD 1008 suggesting again that the effects of DTG on DA levels in the NAc shell are due to its effects on σ2 receptors.
In contrast to the effects obtained with DTG, the effects of the selective σ1_receptor agonist PRE-084 were antagonized by neither of the σ-receptor antagonists examined (BD 1008 and BD 1063). Because of the high affinity and selectivity for σ1 receptors and the very low affinity for the DAT that we found for PRE-084 in binding studies, we therefore tested the possibility that its effects on DA levels were the result of a non-specific DA-releasing action of the drug that was not related to a physiological activation of the DA system. When the NAc shell was perfused with a calcium-free Ringer’s solution through the microdialysis probes, neither σ-receptor agonist PRE-084 nor DTG effectively increased DA levels, suggesting that the increase in DA was the result of a physiological synaptic activity resulting in a vesicular, calcium-dependent DA release (45). Thus, the mechanism for the high-dose effects of PRE-084 on DA levels is not known at this time, but appears to be independent of its actions at σ receptors and unlike the DAT-mediated actions of cocaine. Further, the high selectivity of PRE-084 for σ1 receptors, which has not previously been reported, is consistent with a conclusion that σ2 receptors mediate the effects of the non-selective σ-receptor agonist DTG on DA, and suggests that σ1 receptors are minimally involved in this effect, if at all.
Although the effects of DTG on DA levels appear mediated by σ receptors, the effects of cocaine do not, as neither of the σ-receptor antagonists tested (BD 1008 and BD 1063) altered the acute effects of cocaine on extracellular DA levels. Cocaine has approximately 70-fold higher affinity for the DAT than for σ receptors, and among σ receptors has selectivity for σ1 over σ2 receptors. As the effects of the selective σ1-receptor agonist PRE-084 indicate little involvement of σ1 receptors in its effects on DA, the present results suggest that the effects of cocaine on extracellular DA are minimally influenced, if at all, by its affinity for σ receptors. Thus, although the acute effects of DTG and PRE-084 on DA transmission appear on first blush to be in agreement with their reinforcing effects, their effects on DA are not mediated by similar mechanisms. Further, both σ-receptor antagonists BD 1008 and BD 1063 blocked the self-administration of σ-receptor agonists (26), indicating that their reinforcing effects are mediated by σ receptors. Thus, previous and present results raise questions about the role of DA transmission in the reinforcing effects of σ-receptor agonists.
In conclusion, the present study shows that σ-receptor agonists can stimulate DA transmission in the NAc shell, a brain area that has been involved in the mediation of reinforcing effects of drugs abused by humans. σ2 receptors appear to be primarily involved in the DA stimulating effects of DTG, which may underlie the previously reported reinforcing effects of σ-receptor agonists (26). Further, the present experiments excluded a direct involvement of σ-receptors in the acute DA-stimulating effects of cocaine and PRE-084. Finally, the present results, along with previous findings that both DTG and PRE-084 have reinforcing effects (26) suggest a dopamine-independent reinforcing pathway that may contribute to substance-abuse disorders.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Animals used in the study were experimentally naive at the start of experiments. The animal housing facilities were fully accredited by AAALAC International and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Care and Use Committee of the NIDA Intramural Research Program and the 1996 National Research Council and Guide for care and use of laboratory animals.
Work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, and in part by NIDA grant [DA023205 (CRM)]. LG-R was recipient of a scholarship from CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología), México. We thank Ms. Patty Ballerstadt for administrative support.
List of nonstandard abbreviations
- DA
dopamine
- σ
sigma
- i.v
intravenous
- NS
non-significant
- NAc
nucleus accumbens
- PCP
phencyclidine
- S.E.M
standard error of the mean
Footnotes
Financial Disclosures: CRM, CM, and SN are co-inventors of SN79, one of the compounds described in this manuscript. The patent for this invention is pending and belongs to the University of Mississippi; it has not been licensed to anyone. All other authors declare no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, Huppler RE, Gilbert PE. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1976;197:517–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vaupel DB. Naltrexone fails to antagonize the sigma effects of PCP and SKF 10,047 in the dog. European journal of pharmacology. 1983;92:269–274. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(83)90297-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gundlach AL, Largent BL, Snyder SH. Autoradiographic localization of sigma receptor binding sites in guinea pig and rat central nervous system with (+)3H-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(1-propyl)piperidine. J Neurosci. 1986;6:1757–1770. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-06-01757.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Largent BL, Gundlach AL, Snyder SH. Pharmacological and autoradiographic discrimination of sigma and phencyclidine receptor binding sites in brain with (+)-[3H]SKF 10,047, (+)-[3H]-3-[3-hydroxyphenyl]-N-(1-propyl)piperidine and [3H]-1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1986;238:739–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Quirion R, Bowen WD, Itzhak Y, Junien JL, Musacchio JM, Rothman RB, et al. A proposal for the classification of sigma binding sites. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 1992;13:85–86. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90030-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maurice T, Su TP. The pharmacology of sigma-1 receptors. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2009;124:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hellewell SB, Bowen WD. A sigma-like binding site in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells: decreased affinity for (+)-benzomorphans and lower molecular weight suggest a different sigma receptor form from that of guinea pig brain. Brain research. 1990;527:244–253. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91143-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hanner M, Moebius FF, Flandorfer A, Knaus HG, Striessnig J, Kempner E, et al. Purification, molecular cloning, and expression of the mammalian sigma1-binding site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93:8072–8077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.8072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hellewell SB, Bruce A, Feinstein G, Orringer J, Williams W, Bowen WD. Rat liver and kidney contain high densities of sigma 1 and sigma 2 receptors: characterization by ligand binding and photoaffinity labeling. European journal of pharmacology. 1994;268:9–18. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hayashi T, Su TP. An update on the development of drugs for neuropsychiatric disorders: focusing on the sigma 1 receptor ligand. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2008;12:45–58. doi: 10.1517/14728222.12.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maurice T, Martin-Fardon R, Romieu P, Matsumoto RR. Sigma(1) (sigma(1)) receptor antagonists represent a new strategy against cocaine addiction and toxicity. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2002;26:499–527. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00017-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maurice T, Urani A, Phan VL, Romieu P. The interaction between neuroactive steroids and the sigma1 receptor function: behavioral consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;37:116–132. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matsumoto RR, McCracken KA, Pouw B, Miller J, Bowen WD, Williams W, et al. N-alkyl substituted analogs of the sigma receptor ligand BD1008 and traditional sigma receptor ligands affect cocaine-induced convulsions and lethality in mice. European journal of pharmacology. 2001;411:261–273. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00917-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsumoto RR, McCracken KA, Pouw B, Zhang Y, Bowen WD. Involvement of sigma receptors in the behavioral effects of cocaine: evidence from novel ligands and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42:1043–1055. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00056-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sharkey J, Glen KA, Wolfe S, Kuhar MJ. Cocaine binding at sigma receptors. European journal of pharmacology. 1988;149:171–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsumoto RR, Mack AL. (+/-)-SM 21 attenuates the convulsive and locomotor stimulatory effects of cocaine in mice. European journal of pharmacology. 2001;417:R1–2. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00891-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsumoto RR, Liu Y, Lerner M, Howard EW, Brackett DJ. Sigma receptors: potential medications development target for anti-cocaine agents. European journal of pharmacology. 2003;469:1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01723-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matsumoto RR. Targeting sigma receptors: novel medication development for drug abuse and addiction. Expert Reviews Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;2:351–358. doi: 10.1586/ecp.09.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McCracken KA, Bowen WD, de Costa BR, Matsumoto RR. Two novel sigma receptor ligands, BD1047 and LR172, attenuate cocaine-induced toxicity and locomotor activity. European journal of pharmacology. 1999;370:225–232. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00113-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McCracken KA, Bowen WD, Matsumoto RR. Novel sigma receptor ligands attenuate the locomotor stimulatory effects of cocaine. European journal of pharmacology. 1999;365:35–38. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Menkel M, Terry P, Pontecorvo M, Katz JL, Witkin JM. Selective sigma ligands block stimulant effects of cocaine. European journal of pharmacology. 1991;201:251–252. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90355-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Witkin JM, Terry P, Menkel M, Hickey P, Pontecorvo M, Ferkany J, et al. Effects of the selective sigma receptor ligand, 6-[6-(4-hydroxypiperidinyl)hexyloxy]-3-methylflavone (NPC 16377), on behavioral and toxic effects of cocaine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1993;266:473–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ujike H, Kuroda S, Otsuki S. sigma Receptor antagonists block the development of sensitization to cocaine. European journal of pharmacology. 1996;296:123–128. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00693-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Romieu P, Martin-Fardon R, Maurice T. Involvement of the sigma1 receptor in the cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Neuroreport. 2000;11:2885–2888. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009110-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martin-Fardon R, Maurice T, Aujla H, Bowen WD, Weiss F. Differential effects of sigma1 receptor blockade on self-administration and conditioned reinstatement motivated by cocaine vs natural reward. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:1967–1973. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hiranita T, Soto PL, Tanda G, Katz JL. Reinforcing effects of sigma-receptor agonists in rats trained to self-administer cocaine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2010;332:515–524. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.159236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Skuza G, Wedzony K. Behavioral pharmacology of sigma-ligands. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2004;37(Suppl 3):S183–188. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pontieri FE, Tanda G, Di Chiara G. Intravenous cocaine, morphine, and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the “shell” as compared with the “core” of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:12304–12308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pontieri FE, Tanda G, Orzi F, Di Chiara G. Effects of nicotine on the nucleus accumbens and similarity to those of addictive drugs. Nature. 1996;382:255–257. doi: 10.1038/382255a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tanda G, Pontieri FE, Di Chiara G. Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common mu1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science (New York, NY. 1997;276:2048–2050. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kobayashi T, Matsuno K, Murai M, Mita S. Sigma 1 receptor subtype is involved in the facilitation of cortical dopaminergic transmission in the rat brain. Neurochemical research. 1997;22:1105–1109. doi: 10.1023/a:1027361101419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Minabe Y, Matsuno K, Ashby CR., Jr Acute and chronic administration of the selective sigma1 receptor agonist SA4503 significantly alters the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons in rats: An in vivo electrophysiological study. Synapse (New York, NY. 1999;33:129–140. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199908)33:2<129::AID-SYN3>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gudelsky GA. Effects of sigma receptor ligands on the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the striatum and prefrontal cortex of the rat. European journal of pharmacology. 1995;286:223–228. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gudelsky GA. Biphasic effect of sigma receptor ligands on the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the striatum of the rat. J Neural Transm. 1999;106:849–856. doi: 10.1007/s007020050205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moison D, De Deurwaerdere P, Cagnotto A, Marrazzo A, Prezzavento O, Ronsisvalle G, et al. Intrastriatal administration of sigma ligands inhibits basal dopamine release in vivo. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45:945–953. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(03)00253-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patrick SL, Walker JM, Perkel JM, Lockwood M, Patrick RL. Increases in rat striatal extracellular dopamine and vacuous chewing produced by two sigma receptor ligands. European journal of pharmacology. 1993;231:243–249. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90456-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bowen WD, De Costa BR, Hellewell SB, Walker JM, Rice KC. [3H]-(+)-Pentazocine: a potent and highly selective benzomorphan-based probe for sigma-1 receptors. Molecular Neuropharmacology. 1993;3:117–126. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tam SW. Naloxone-inaccessible sigma receptor in rat central nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1983;80:6703–6707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Houlihan WJ, Kelly L, Pankuch J, Koletar J, Brand L, Janowsky A, et al. Mazindol analogues as potential inhibitors of the cocaine binding site at the dopamine transporter. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2002;45:4097–4109. doi: 10.1021/jm010302r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tanda G, Di Chiara G. A dopamine-mu1 opioid link in the rat ventral tegmentum shared by palatable food (Fonzies) and non-psychostimulant drugs of abuse. The European journal of neuroscience. 1998;10:1179–1187. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tanda G, Ebbs A, Newman AH, Katz JL. Effects of 4′-chloro-3 alpha-(diphenylmethoxy)-tropane on mesostriatal, mesocortical, and mesolimbic dopamine transmission: comparison with effects of cocaine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2005;313:613–620. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.080465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tanda G, Kopajtic TA, Katz JL. Cocaine-like neurochemical effects of antihistaminic medications. Journal of neurochemistry. 2008;106:147–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05361.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Sidney, Australia: Academic Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carboni E, Cadoni C, Tanda GL, Di Chiara G. Calcium-dependent, tetrodotoxin-sensitive stimulation of cortical serotonin release after a tryptophan load. Journal of neurochemistry. 1989;53:976–978. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb11802.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Di Chiara G, Tanda G, Carboni E. Estimation of in-vivo neurotransmitter release by brain microdialysis: the issue of validity. Behavioural pharmacology. 1996;7:640–657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kaushal N, Croom C, Shaikh J, Narayanan S, Mesangeau C, Poupaert JH, et al. SN79, A Novel Sigma2 Receptor Antagonist, Attenuates Cocaine-Induced Behaviors In Mice. The FASEB Journal. 2008;22:713–715. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matsumoto RR, Hemstreet MK, Lai NL, Thurkauf A, De Costa BR, Rice KC, et al. Drug specificity of pharmacological dystonia. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 1990;36:151–155. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Maurice T, Phan VL, Noda Y, Yamada K, Privat A, Nabeshima T. The attenuation of learning impairments induced after exposure to CO or trimethyltin in mice by sigma (sigma) receptor ligands involves both sigma1 and sigma2 sites. British journal of pharmacology. 1999;127:335–342. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Di Chiara G, Tanda G, Bassareo V, Pontieri F, Acquas E, Fenu S, et al. Drug addiction as a disorder of associative learning. Role of nucleus accumbens shell/extended amygdala dopamine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999;877:461–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Di Chiara G, Tanda G, Cadoni C, Acquas E, Bassareo V, Carboni E. Homologies and differences in the action of drugs of abuse and a conventional reinforcer (food) on dopamine transmission: an interpretative framework of the mechanism of drug dependence. Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif. 1998;42:983–987. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60911-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Koob GF. Drug Reward and Addiction. In: Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, Roberts JL, Spitzer NC, Zigmond MJ, editors. Fundamental Neuroscience. 2. Boston: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 1127–1143. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




