Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010 Nov 21;21(1):48–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.11.076

The synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(3-methyl or 3-phenylisoxazol-5-yl)-3-aryl-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes

Madhusudhan Purushotham a, Anjaneyulu Sheri a, Duy-Phong Pham-Huu a, Bertha K Madras c, Aaron Janowsky b, Peter C Meltzer a,*
PMCID: PMC3015105  NIHMSID: NIHMS259309  PMID: 21146984

Cocaine addiction continues to present a global problem. Notwithstanding substantial research, a clinically useful candidate to address this addiction has yet to emerge and physicians confronted with addicted patients continue to lack appropriate medications. Nonetheless, a substantial understanding of this disease has emerged, and the directions that discovery research may take in order to uncover a useful medication have made considerable advances.

Cocaine is a potent stimulant of the central nervous system. It owes its reinforcing and stimulant properties to its ability to inhibit monoamine uptake systems such as the Dopamine Transporter (DAT), and the Serotonin Transporter (SERT) located on presynaptic neurons in the nucleus accumbens and striatum.1-8 Cocaine inhibition of these monoamine uptake systems reduces the removal of excess dopamine from the synapse. The resultant increase in synaptic dopamine concentration increases activation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors. This hyperstimulation of postsynaptic receptors is responsible for cocaine’s stimulant activity. The reinforcing and addictive properties of cocaine are postulated to be related to its pharmacokinetic profile9 characterized by its immediate effect (<15 seconds) and short duration of action (10-15 minutes). Therefore, the search for replacement therapeutic agents has focused on the design of compounds that bind selectively to the DAT, but manifest slow onset of stimulatory action with long duration of action.9

The class of bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes,10,11 of which cocaine (Figure 1) is a member, has offered a springboard for the discovery of DAT selective inhibitors. Since 1973 when Clarke et al.12 disclosed WIN35,428, a 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane, a large number of 8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (tropane) analogs have been prepared and evaluated and some have offered intriguing possibilities as potential medications for cocaine abuse, as well as imaging agents13 for diagnosis of diseases that are correlated with dopamine neuron compromise. Of particular relevance to the work that we now describe is Carroll’s DAT inhibitor, RTI336, currently in clinical trials.14 This compound is a 3β-(4-chlorophenyl)tropane substituted in the 2β-position by a 3-(4-methylphenyl)isoxazole in place of the C2β-methyl ester present in WIN35,428.15

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cocaine, WIN35,428 and RTI336

In 1997 we presented evidence16 that the 8-aza functionality within the 8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane series was not a prerequisite for potent inhibition of monoamine uptake systems. We proposed that the topological properties of tropane-like ligands (bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes) that bind to monoamine uptake systems was more important than the presence, or absence, of specific functionality, and we reported that 8-oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes (8-oxatropanes)16 and 8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes (8-thiatropanes)11 also manifested substantial binding potency at the DAT as well as selectivity versus SERT inhibition. The biological liability of the C2-ester became apparent to us in our early design of potential SPECT imaging agents13,17 when we had speculated that rapid in vivo hydrolysis of the C2-ester may have been a contributing factor toward erratic imaging results. We therefore replaced that ester with a hydrolysis-stable ethyl ketone and developed an improved agent, Fluoratec.13 This led us to reconsider how we might stabilize C2-functionality in the 8-oxa and 8-thiatropane series. Kotian’s and Carroll’s reports15,18 of a comparison of 8-aza tropane C2-bioisosteres prompted us to introduce a C2-isoxazole in our 8-thiatropane series.

We now report the synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of 2-(3-methyl or 3-phenylisoxazol-5-yl)-3-aryl-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and oct-2-enes. These compounds have proved potent and selective inhibitors of DAT.

The synthesis of this new class of 2-isoxazolyl-3-aryl-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-enes 4 and -2-anes, 5 and 6, is presented in Scheme 1. The starting unsaturated C2-methyl esters 1 provided the isoxazoles 4 as described below. These esters 1 were then reduced with samarium iodide to obtain both the 3α-aryl (2) and 3β-aryl (3) configured compounds, as we have described previously.11 Separation of the 3α-2 and the 3β-2 was cumbersome and time consuming. Since the C2-isoxazoles were the target compounds, it proved much more convenient to convert a mixture of the isomers 2 and 3 to their corresponding isoxazoles 5 and 6 and then conduct separation of the mixture at the isoxazole stage. Thus n-BuLi was added to a mixture of 2 and 3 in anhydrous THF at 0° C containing either acetophenone oxime to obtain the 3-methylisoxazoles (5a-e or 6a-e) or benzophenone oxime to obtain the 3-phenylisoxazoles (5f-j or 6f-j) in anhydrous THF at 0° C. The reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature and the final ring closure and dehydration were effected at reflux after addition of sulfuric acid. The products were extracted into methylene chloride and purified by flash column chromatography to provide pure 5a-e and 6f-j. While the unsaturated isoxazoles 4 were obtained in reasonable yields for both the 3-methyl- and 3-phenylisoxazoles (40-80%), the saturated 3-methylisoxazoles (5a-e and 6f-j) were generally obtained in poor yields (7-45%).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

General Synthetic Route to 2-(Isoxazol-5-yl)-3-aryl-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes

Configurational assignments of compounds 4, 5, and 6 were readily achieved by 1H-NMR. In particular, the resonance positions and multiplicity observed for the H2, H3, H and H protons proved diagnostic. Thus the 2,3-enes, exemplified for 4a, manifested characteristic double multiplets between δ2.96-3.04 for H that reflected gem coupling (J4α,4β = 19 Hz) as well as vicinal (J4,5 = ~3 Hz) and w-long range coupling (J4,6 = ~3 Hz). H resonated at δ2.48 (J4α,5 = ~2.5 Hz). The vicinal coupling constants of J = ~2.5-3 Hz for both H and H to H5 implied approximately equal dihedral angles (H or H-C4-C5-H5 of 55°-60°) thus indicating that C1-C2-C3-C4-C5 are approximately coplanar. The 3α-aryl boat configured 5a manifested diagnostic resonances for H2 δ3.03, H3 δ3.16 (ddd), and H δ1.37 (ddd). The coupling constant between H3 and H2 and H4 respectively (J3,2 = 11.5 Hz, J3,4α = 13 Hz) confirmed transdiaxial interactions that can only be achieved in a boat conformation. Furthermore, the double double doublet for H(J3,4α, = 13 Hz, J4α,4β = 13 Hz, J4α,5 = 2 Hz) evident in these C2-isoxazoles had proved diagnostic among boat conformers in all tropane-like classes of [3.2.1]bicyclooctanes.16,19,20,11 The 3β-aryl chair-configured 6a had H2 δ3.66 (dd), H3 δ3.43, H4α, δ1.36 (ddd), and H δ2.50 (ddd).

The affinities (IC50 values) for the DAT and SERT were determined in competition studies with tritium labeled ligands (Table 1).21 The DAT was labeled with [3H]3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester ([3H]WIN 35,428 or [3H]CFT (4 nM)) and non-specific binding was defined as the difference in binding in the presence and absence of (−)-cocaine (100 μM). [3H]Citalopram was used to label the SERT and non-specific binding was measured in the presence of fluoxetine (10 μM). Competition studies were conducted with a fixed concentration of radioligand and a range of concentrations of the test drug. All drugs inhibited [3H]WIN 35,428 and [3H]citalopram binding in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition constants (IC50) are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Inhibition of [3H]WIN35,428 binding to the human dopamine transporter (hDAT) and [3H]citalopram binding to the human serotonin transporter (hSERT) for 4-6a

graphic file with name nihms-259309-t0003.jpg

4 IC50 (nM) 5 IC50 (nM) 6 IC50 (nM)
Cpd R1 R2 Cpd#b DAT SERT Cpd# DAT SERT Cpd# DAT SERT
Cocaine 670 ± 92 540 ± 35
2-ester e - F O-2643 220 >10μM O-3856 59 >10μM O-3876 38 494
2-ester e - Cl O-2683 13 >10μM O-3768 11 >1μM O-3806 9.6 33
a CH3 H O-4165 >2μm >10μm O-3961 65 ± 4 >10μm O-4315 12 ± 1 >10μm
b CH3 F O-3990 >1μM >10μM O-3991 22 ± 3 >10μM O-4210 7.0 ± 2.0 >1μM
c CH3 Cl O-3978 155 ± 54 >10μM O-3936 32.7 ± 2.8 >7μM O-6257 7.2 ± 1.8 >1μM
d CH3 Br O-3992 139 ± 32 >10μM O-3977 46.6 ± 9.5 >4μM O-3994 14 ± 1.4 755 ± 110
e CH3 3,4-Cl2 O-3911 69.2 ± 17.9 >10μM O-3976 101.3 ± 14.4 >2μM O-3979 43.5 ± 15.9 766 ± 327
f C6H5 H O-4144 >5μM >10μM O-3887 >1μM >10μM O-4028 157 ± 42 >10μM
g C6H5 F O-4070 >2μM >10μM O-4204 456 ± 71 >10μM O-4209 49 ± 10 >10μM
h C6H5 Cl O-4004c 66.5 >10μM O-3888c 130 >10μM d d
i C6H5 Br O-3993c 126 >10μM O-3909c 238 >10μM d d
j C6H5 3,4-Cl2 O-3995c 332 >10μM O-3912c 497 >10μM O-3913c 269 >10μM
a

Compounds are racemic.

b

Each value is the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate.

c

Except: The data for compounds h-j were screening data used to determine which class to proceed with, the 3-methyl class or the 3-phenyl class. Errors do not generally exceed 15% between replicate experiments conducted in triplicate.

d

Not available.

e

Data taken from Pham-Huu et al. Bioorg & Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 1067.

The goal of this preliminary study was two-fold. First, we wished to explore whether the hydrolytically labile C2-ester of the parent 2-carbomethoxy analogs could be replaced within the 8-thiatropane series while maintaining DAT potency. Second, we wished to evaluate whether a small 3-methylisoxazole or the larger 3-phenylisoxazole would confer greater DAT inhibitory potency. Data in Table 1 show that introduction of a 2-isoxazole was not deleterious to DAT binding, indeed the C2-isoxazole resulted in substantial selectivity because these compounds had essentially no inhibitory potency at the SERT. In comparison with their progenitors, the 2-carbomethoxy analogs (4, 5, and 6-C2-methylesters), it is clear that exchange of an isoxazole for a carbomethoxy group at C2 resulted in similar, or even enhanced, potency for the 3α-boat 5 and 3β-chair 6 series, although reduced potency was evident in the 2,3-unsaturated isoxazole series 4. Within the 2,3-ene-series 4, the presence of a 3-methyl or a 3-phenyl on the C2-isoxazole had little, if any, impact on DAT potency. In contrast, within the 3α-boat 5 and 3β-chair 6 series, the 3-methylisoxazole compounds were between 5 to 20-fold more potent at DAT than the 3-phenylisoxazoles. Our on-going studies are consequently focused more heavily on the 3-methylisoxazole series. It is interesting that within the limited number of compounds within each structural class (4, 5, 6) the 3β-aryl (chair-configured) compounds 6 were more potent DAT inhibitors than the 3α-aryl (boat-configured) class 5, while the more planar compounds 4 had the least inhibitory potency at DAT. An exception to this was the family of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) analogs 4e, 5e, 6e and 4j, 5j, and 6j. It is possible that the lipophilicity inherent in the 3,4-dichlorophenyl motif influenced the mode of interaction of these molecules with their binding site on the DAT. We had observed a similar effect previously in our exploration of 3,4-dichlorophenyl substituted tropanes11,10 The replacement of the 8-aza functionality with the 8-thia functionality can lead to a reduction in DAT inhibitory potency. Thus the 2β-(3-methylisoxazol-5-yl)-3β-(4-chlorophenyl)-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (IC50 = 0.59 nM) reported by Carroll13 is about ten times more potent at DAT inhibition than the directly analogous 8-thia compound, 6c (IC50 = 7.2 nM). Finally, within this class of 8-thia compounds, the influence of aromatic substituents on the 3-aryl group upon DAT potency or selectivity was small. Thus, the 4-fluorophenyl and 4-chlorophenyl analogs in each class (boat or chair) were similar to one another in potency (5b, 5c: IC50 = 22-33 nM; 6b, 6c: IC50 = 7 nM). However, the chair compounds 6b, 6c were about 3-5 fold more potent than the boat analogs 5b, 5c.

In conclusion, a series of 2-(3-methyl or 3-phenylisoxazol-5-yl)-3-aryl-8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and oct-2-enes was synthesized. This new class of 8-thiabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes provided potent and selective inhibitors of the DAT. The C2-ester present in cocaine and the parent bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes could be replaced by a C2-isoxazole with retention of inhibitory potency at the DAT. The 3β-aryl compounds proved particularly potent inhibitors of DAT (IC50 = 7-43 nM) with substantial selectivity versus inhibition of SERT. In both the 3α-aryl and 3β-aryl series, the 3-methylisoxazole manifested superior DAT inhibitory potency and selectivity compared with the 3-phenylisoxazoles.

Supplementary Material

01
02

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (PM: DA11542; AJ: DAO18165; BKM: DA06303) and by the VA Merit Review and Research Career Scientist Programs (AJ).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information associated with this article can be found, in the online version, as doi: . Synthetic procedures, spectral data, and biological assays are provided.

References

  • 1.Kennedy LT, Hanbauer I. J. Neurochem. 1983;34:1137. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb13666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ritz MC, Lamb RJ, Goldberg SR, Kuhar MJ. Science. 1987;237:1219. doi: 10.1126/science.2820058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuhar MJ, Ritz MC, Boja JW. Trends Neurosci. 1991;14:299. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(91)90141-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spealman RD. Psychopharmacol. 1993;112:93. doi: 10.1007/BF02247368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rocha BA, Fumagalli F, Gainetdinov RR, Jones SR, Ator R, Giros B, Miller GW, Caron MG. Nat. Neurosci. 1998;1(2):132. doi: 10.1038/381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uhl GR, Hall FS, Sora I. Mol. Psychiatry. 2002;7:21. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh S. Chem. Rev. 2000;100:925. doi: 10.1021/cr9700538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trudell ML, Izenwasser S. Dopamine Transporters Chemistry, Biology and Pharmacology. 1 ed. Wiley-VCH; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rothman RB, Mele A, Reid AA, Akunne HC, Greig N, Thurkauf A, deCosta BR, Rice KC, Pert A. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1991;40:387. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90570-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meltzer PC, Blundell P, Madras BK. Med. Chem. Res. 1998;8:12. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pham-Huu DP, Deschamps JR, Liu S, Madras BK, Meltzer PC. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. 2007;15:1067. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clarke RL, Daum SJ, Gambino AJ, Aceto MD, Pearl J, Levitt M, Cumiskey WR, Bogado EF. J. Med. Chem. 1973;16:1260. doi: 10.1021/jm00269a600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meltzer PC, Blundell P, Zona T, Yang L, Huang H, Fischman A, Madras BK. J. Med. Chem. 2001;46:3483. doi: 10.1021/jm0301484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carroll FI, Howard JL, Howell LL, Fox BS, Kuhar MJ. AAPS Journal. 2006;8:E196. doi: 10.1208/aapsj080124. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00808119?term=RTI+336&rank=1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carroll FI, Pawlush N, Kuhar MJ, Pollard GT, Howard JL. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:296. doi: 10.1021/jm030453p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meltzer PC, Liang AY, Blundell P, Gonzalez MD, Chen Z, George C, Madras BK. J. Med. Chem. 1997;40:2661. doi: 10.1021/jm9703045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meltzer PC, Blundell P, Jones AG, Mahmood A, Garada B, Zimmerman RE, Davison A, Holman BL, Madras BK. J. Med. Chem. 1997;40:1835. doi: 10.1021/jm960868t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kotian P, Mascarella SW, Abraham P, Lewin AH, Boja JW, Kuhar MJ, Carroll FI. J. Med. Chem. 1996;39:2753. doi: 10.1021/jm960160e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meltzer PC, Pham-Huu D-P, Madras BK. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:6007. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meltzer PC, Wang B, Chen Z, Blundell P, Jayaraman M, Gonzalez MD, George C, Madras BK. J. Med. Chem. 2001;44:2619. doi: 10.1021/jm0101242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meltzer PC, Kryatova O, Pham-Huu D-P, Donovan P, Janowsky A. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. 2008;16:1832. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02

RESOURCES