Skip to main content
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons logoLink to JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
. 1998 Jan-Mar;2(1):47–49.

Facilitating Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomoses

Roberto Bergamaschi 1,2,, Trond Kjetil Haugstvedt 1, Ronald Marvik 2
PMCID: PMC3015262  PMID: 9876710

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

An experimental study was undertaken to evaluate whether a previously described technique for laparoscopic sigmoid resection with intracorporeal resection-anastomosis and specimen removal via a suprapubic incision could be facilitated and applied to the rectum.

Methods:

Ten domestic pigs (median weight 41 kg) underwent low anterior resection of the rectum, which was transected with an articulating endoscopic stapler. Pursestring sutures were fashioned intracorporeally with a laparoscopic pursestring clamp. The anvil of a circular stapler was inserted through a 33 mm port into the colon and pursestring tied intracorporeally. A circular gun with a spike fixed to its shaft was introduced per anum and a double-stapled anastomosis performed.

Results:

Complete doughnuts were obtained in all cases and anastomoses were all methylene blue tight. All porcine subjects had an uneventful 5-week postoperative course. The median anastomotic level from the anal verge was 5.2 cm. Histology of colorectal anastomoses revealed healing mucosa.

Conclusions:

The use of articulating endoscopic stapler, laparoscopic pursestring clamp, and circular stapler with a spike fixed to its shaft seems to facilitate a previously described intracorporeal approach to sigmoid resection which was safely applied to the rectum in a porcine model.

Keywords: Anastomosis, Colorectal surgery, Laparoscopy, Surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosing techniques have been the topic of considerable experimental research14 since the original description by Jacobs et al.5 Nevertheless, completely laparoscopic colorectal procedures have been adopted in clinical practice by a limited number of surgeons.69 This is possibly due to increased operating time and costs,10 to the fact that their relative benefit is as yet unclear,11 and that these procedures are technically demanding. The latter reason prompted this experimental study, which was carried out to evaluate whether a previously described intracorporeal approach to sigmoid resection9 could be facilitated and applied to the rectum in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten domestic pigs with a median weight of 40.7 kg (range 38.5-43 kg) were anesthetized with intubation and ventilation with halothane. Prior to surgery, the animals were fasted for 48 hours and kept on fluids ad libitum and received a 2-liter enema. Pneumoperitoneum was induced using carbon dioxide insufflated to a pressure of 10 mm Hg by placement of a trocar in the infraumbilical skin using a cut-down technique. A 0° forward-viewing telescope was employed. Two 12 mm ports were then inserted in the left hypocondrium and in the midline cephalad to the umbilicus. Due to porcine anatomy, a 33 mm cannula (Endopath®, Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH) was inserted in the right iliac fossa rather than suprapubically. All subjects were turned into a steep head-down position in addition to a right lateral tilt until no small bowel was seen in the field.

A surgical technique previously described for laparoscopic sigmoid resection with intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and specimen removal via a suprapubic incision9 was modified as follows. Once the proximal site of bowel division was identified, a laparoscopic pursestring clamp (Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH) (Figure 1) was applied to the colon, and two straight needles (placed at opposite ends of a monofilament suture and held in position against the clamp by an endoloop) were passed through the clamp and retrieved through a port, as previously described.12 The colon was divided with scissors against the pursestring clamp after having been ligated with an intracorporeally knotted suture. The lower third of the rectum was transected with an articulating endoscopic stapler (ETS FLEX 35, Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH). A plastic bag allowed temporary intra-abdominal storage of the specimen. The rectal stump was irrigated by 1uminal wash-out in order to verify that the linear staple row was tight. The anvil of a circular stapler (ECS 25 Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH) held by a modified Allis-clamp was inserted through the 33 mm port into the colon and the pursestring was tied intracorporeally around the anvil notch. The same circular gun with a spike fixed to its shaft was introduced per anum (Figure 2), and a doublestapled colorectal anastomosis was performed according to a previously-described technique.13 The integrity of the anastomosis was checked by irrigation with methylene blue after the application of a noncrushing intestinal clamp just proximal to the circular staple line. The anastomotic level from the anal verge was evaluated by intraoperative rigid proctoscopy. The specimen, in a plastic bag, was delivered through the 33 mm port.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Laparoscopic pursestring suture clamp.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Circular stapler with spike fixed to its shaft is advanced behind the staple line of the rectal stump.

RESULTS

The procedure described above was reiterated exactly in the same fashion in ten pigs. No perioperative deaths occurred. Median operating time was 75 mins. (range 50-105 mins.). The linear staple row was water-tight in all cases. Complete proximal and distal doughnuts were obtained in all cases and anastomoses were all methylene blue tight. The mean anastomotic level from the anal verge was 5.2 cm (range 4-6 cm). There were no intraoperative complications. All porcine subjects had an uneventful 5-week postoperative course at the end of which both laparoscopy and rigid proctoscopy were carried out. At celioscopy there were no adhesions or other abnormalities at the anastomotic site, while endoscopy revealed normal suture lines. Histology of colorectal anastomoses revealed healing mucosa with neither foreign body reactions nor thickening of bowel wall at anastomotic site.

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic linear staplers allow bowel division at the rectosigmoid junction. Transection of the rectum at a lower level can be achieved inserting an open-surgery articulating stapler through a suprapubic incision.14 However, this approach requires a third stapler (in addition to endoscopic linear and circular staplers), re-establishing pneumoperitoneum twice, and manipulation of an open-surgery stapling device with laparoscopic graspers.14 The results of the present experimental study show that the use of a laparoscopic articulating stapling device helps to overcome these downsides and allows secure division of the low rectum.

Intracorporeally hand-sewn pursestring sutures are usually fashioned with curved or ski-shaped needles on the proximal colon,15 but this is a time-consuming procedure. The introduction of the T-needle technique (Endo-Stitch®, USSC, Norwalk, CT) failed to facilitate this procedure.9 In fact, since the T-needle should not be detached from the instrument's jaws (unless for reloading), the anvil shaft must, at a certain point, be loosened from the Allis-clamp to allow 360° suturing and tying around the pursestring notch of the anvil.9 Data from the present study confirm, in accordance with Köckerling et al.,12 that the use of a laparoscopic pursestring suture clamp seems to facilitate the construction of intracorporeal pursestring sutures and results in a safe colorectal anastomosis.

According to previously described techniques,9,14 once the circular stapling gun's central spike (Auto Suture®, PCEEATM, USSC, Norwalk, Connecticut) is advanced behind the staple line of the rectal stump, the spike must be disconnected and removed through a port (Figure 3). The use of a gun adapted for laparoscopy (with a spike fixed to its shaft) (Figure 2) eliminates the need for retrieval of the spike.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Circular stapler with spike not fixed to its shaft is disconnected and removed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that a previously described intracorporeal approach to sigmoid resection9 can be facilitated and applied safely to the rectum in a porcine model. However, further experimental and clinical comparative studies are needed with regard to safety, time-frame and costs of the construction of intracorporeal pursestring sutures.

References:

  • 1. Bleday R, Babineau T, Forse RA. Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer. Sem Surg Oncol. 1993;9:59–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lirici MM, Buess G, Melzer A, Weinreich S, Wehrmann M, Becker HD. New technique for sigmoid colectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1606–1609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mentges B, Buess G, Schäfer D, Manncke K, Becker HD. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and combined operations. In Moreno-González E, Escartín P, Lygidakis NJ, Balibrea JL, Pajares JM, Hidalgo Pascual M. eds. Joint Meeting of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy. Madrid: Jarpyo; 1995:339–345 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kockerling F, Schneider I, Schneider C, Hohenberger W. Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis in the colon using the biofragmentable anastomotic ring - an animal study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:299–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–150 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Darzi A, Super P, Guillou PJ, Monson JRT. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Total laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:268–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A. Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:S35–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kim J, Shim M, Kwun K. Laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:582–583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP. Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis following laparoscopic left colon resection. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:800–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Scott HJ, Spencer J. Colectomy: The role of laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:382–386 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ortega EA, Peters JH. Physiologic alterations of endosurgery. In Peters JH, DeMeester TR. eds. Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Foregut. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1994 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Köckerling F, Schneider I, Gastinger I, Schneider B, Gall FP. Anastomosis with laparoscopic pursestring suture clamp. In Jager RM, Wexner SD. eds. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery New York, Edinburgh, London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery. 1980;88:710–714 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Feliciotti F. A new technique to facilitate laparoscopic resection of low rectal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:9–12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hartley JE, Darzi A, Monson JRT. Anastomosis in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In Monson JRT, Darzi A. eds. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Oxford: Isis Medical Media; 1995:134–147 [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons are provided here courtesy of Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons

RESOURCES