Skip to main content
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons logoLink to JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):241–244.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Management of Mediastinal Tumors

Yu-Jen Cheng 1,5,, Hsing-Hsien Wu 2,5, Shah-Hwa Chou 3,5, Eing-Long Kao 4,5
PMCID: PMC3015450  PMID: 11548830

Abstract

Background:

Many successful attempts at removing benign mediastinal tumors with the video-assisted thoracoscopic technique have been reported, but no formal report has been published regarding malignant mediastinal tumors treated with this technique. We report our preliminary experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal tumors, benign or malignant.

Methods:

Seven patients with mediastinal tumors treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were reviewed from January 1999 to April 2000. Their tumor pathologies included benign or malignant thymoma, neurilemmoma, and teratoma.

Results:

The mean operation time was 240 minutes. The mean blood loss was 173 mL. The mean insertion time of chest tubes was 3 days. The mean admission time was 6 days. No deaths occurred during the study. Morbidity occurred in 2 patients. No tumor recurrence has been seen during the mean follow-up of 7 months.

Conclusions:

The short-term results support the feasibility of VATS in managing technically resectable mediastinal tumors. Yet the long-term prognosis for the malignant lesions is deferred and needs further study.

Keywords: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Thymoma, Neurilemmoma, Teratoma

INTRODUCTION

Compared with the conventional operation, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is an alternative method for managing thoracic diseases and has gradually become a standard approach to some mediastinal lesions. Many successful attempts at VATS to remove benign mediastinal tumors have been reported in the literature.15 With regard to malignant tumors, considering the possibility of the incomplete resection, most thoracic surgeons are reluctant to perform VATS resection.58 However, with the advancement in video-equipment and greater experience gained by VATS enthusiasts, it is appropriate to say that we should try to use VATS to remove some resectable malignant tumors with a curative intention. Here is our preliminary report.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study. All patients with suspected mediastinal tumors suitable for operation were surveyed and informed about the procedure of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and the comparison between the conventional operation and VATS. All the patients agreed that VATS was to be performed initially and that it would be continued if the tumor was resectable with VATS, even if the tumor was malignant. Yet, if it were impossible to complete the tumor resection with VATS, an immediate conversion would be performed. From January 1999 to April 2000, 7 patients were included in this study. Four patients were included due to thymoma with or without myasthenia gravis (MG), and 3 patients were included due to mediastinal cystic tumors (Table 1). The study included 5 women and 2 men. The mean age was 42 years, with the age ranging from 14 to 65 years.

Table 1.

Seven patients were included in this study.

Patient Sex Age (years) Tumor location Pathology Size (cm)
1 Male 20 Anterior mediastinum Mature Teratoma 10x6x3.5
2 Female 55 Posterior mediastinum Neurilemmoma 6x3.5x2.3
3 Female 46 Anterior mediastinumy Benign Thymoma 6.5x4x1
4 Male 65 Anterior mediastinum Malignant Thymoma* 5.7x4x1.5
5 Female 14 Anterior mediastinum Malignant Thymoma * 7.5x3x1.5
6 Female 50 Posterior mediastinum Neurilemmoma 3.7x2.1x0.6
7 Female 44 Anterior mediastinum Malignant Thymoma 9x4x2
*

Masaoka9 Stage IIA

Masaoka Stage IIB

RESULTS

The right-thoracic approach was used 4 times and the left-side approach was used 3 times. The mean operation time was 240 minutes, ranging from 120 to 360 minutes. The mean blood loss was 173 mL, ranging from 10 mL to 450 mL. All patients were extubated in the recovery room, except for 2 MG patients who were extubated the day after the operation. One or 2 chest tubes were inserted after each VATS procedure, the number of which depended on the individual condition. The mean insertion time of chest tubes was 3 days, ranging from 1 day to 11 days. No deaths occurred during the study. However, morbidity occurred in a patient with benign thymoma with MG, who was extubated the day after the operation, but she required reintubation 4 days after the operation due to progressive dyspnea and required ventilator support for 5 days. She received 1 cycle of plasma-pheresis, and was ultimately extubated 9 days after the operation. The other case of morbidity occurred in a patient with malignant thymoma with MG, who suffered from chylothorax after the operation. Fortunately, it subsided after conservative treatment. This was the only patient who needed chest tube insertion longer than 4 days. All patients recovered well, and the mean admission time was 6 days, ranging from 2 days to 12 days. Pathologically, of the 4 thymomatous patients in this study, 1 had the tumor confined in the capsule (Masaoka 9 stage I), 2 had microscopic capsular invasion (Masaoka stage IIA), and 1 had macroscopic capsular invasion (Masaoka stage IIB) (Table 1). No tumor recurrence has been seen during the mean follow-up of 7 months, ranging from 2 months to 15 months.

DISCUSSION

The technical goal of thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma, with or without MG, is the complete removal of the tumor and all the related tissues, 915 which is the same as that of thymectomy in MG patients. 1618 Currently, 6 surgical techniques exist for performing thymectomy with different estimated extents of resection 18 (Table 2). Maximal transcervical-transsternal thymectomy is considered the preferred procedure, which has the most extended resection, removing 98% to 100% of the thymus and its related tissues. 1819 Although the resection extent reached by VATS thymectomy is lower (80% to 85%), it is almost the same as that reached by the widely performed extended transsternal thymectomy. 20 With the benefit of minimal access and the acceptable resection extent, 2022 the author considers that an adequate resection can be performed with VATS that meets both anatomical and surgical requirements. Therefore, the author prospectively tried VATS to remove the thymoma in thymomatous patients with or without MG. The right thoracic approach is preferred 5 except in the case of obvious left-sided thymoma. The existence of thymoma is best detected by chest computed tomography (CT), with 85% sensitivity, 98.7% specificity, and a 95.8% accuracy rate.23 Chest CT can also detect tumor invasion of the peripheral tissue or great vessel involvement, under which condition the VATS procedure is deemed impractical. Landreneau et al15 suggest that if a patient has an anterior mediastinal mass without evidence of local invasion on computed tomography, exploratory thoracoscopy may be considered. If thoracoscopy fails to reveal intrathoracic metastases or local invasion, thoracoscopic resection of the entire lesion may be undertaken.15 However, their VATS resection of thymoma was limited to Masaoka stage I only. In the author's opinion, VATS resection of Masaoka stage IIA or IIB is not contraindicated if the resection can remove the entire tumor and the related tissue and if subtle manipulation of tumor tissue to avoid spreading is followed, such as protecting the wound from implantation of a tumor by using a tissue-removing bag.

Table 2.

Estimated extent of resection.*

Thymectomy technique Extent
“Maximal” transcervical-transsternal 98–100%
“Extended” transsternal 85–95%
VATS resection 80–85%
“Extended” transcervical 75–80%
“Classical” transsternal 70–75%
“Basic” transcervical 45–50%
*

Rough estimate.

(From Alfred Jaretzki III. Neurology 1997)18

Three VATS procedures exist in this study for benign mediastinal cystic tumors. One of the benign cystic tumors is a huge mature teratoma with a diameter of 10 x 6 x 3.5 cm.24 It seems that a huge-sized cystic lesion is not a contraindication to VATS. In a previous report 1 of multicenter VATS experience with mediastinal tumors, the conclusion was that video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe technique for benign mediastinal tumors, typically for those in the middle and posterior mediastinum. The author believes that in the anterior mediastinum, VATS is also a safe technique.

Surely, this preliminary report has a limited number of cases, and follow-up duration is not long enough. Further observation is needed to verify the role of VATS in the management of mediastinal tumors, especially malignant ones.

Contributor Information

Yu-Jen Cheng, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery..

Hsing-Hsien Wu, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery..

Shah-Hwa Chou, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery..

Eing-Long Kao, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery..

References:

  • 1. Demmy TL, Krasna MK, Detterbeck FC, et al. Multicenter VATS experience with mediastinal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 187–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hazelrigg SR, Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Acuff TE. Thoracoscopic resection of mediastinal cysts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 659–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Roviaro GC, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, et al. Major thoracoscopic operations: pulmonary resection and mediastinal mass excision. Int Surg. 1996; 81: 354–358 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Coosemans W, Lerut TE, Van Raemdonck DEM. Thoracoscopic surgery: the Belgian experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 721–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yim APC. Video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of anterior mediastinal masses. Int Surg. 1996; 81: 350–353 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sugarbaker DJ. Thoracoscopy in the management of anterior mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 653–656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scalambra SM. Videothoracoscopic excision of mediastinal masses: indications and technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 58: 1679–1684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kohman LJ. Controversies in the management of malignant thymoma. Chest. 1997; 112: 296s–300s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymoma with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer. 1981; 48: 2385–2492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fechner RE. Recurrence of noninvasive thymoma. Cancer. 1969; 23: 1423–1427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Verley JM, Hollmann KH. Thymoma. A comparative study of clinical stages, histologic features, and survival in 200 cases. Cancer. 1985; 55: 1074–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kirschner PA. Reoperation for thymoma: report of 23 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990; 49: 550–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pescarmona E, Rendina EA, Venuta F, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors and clinicopathological staging of thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990; 50: 534–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wilkins EW, Jr, Grillo HC, Scannell JG, Moncure AC, Mathisen DJ. Role of staging in prognosis and management of thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991; 51: 888–892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Landreneau RJ, Dowling RD, Castillo WM, Ferson PF. Thoracoscopic resection of an anterior mediastinal tumor. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992; 54: 142–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Verma P, Oger J. Treatment of acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis: a topic review. Can J Neurol Sci. 1992; 19: 360–375 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1979–1810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jaretzki A., III Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: analysis of the controversies regarding technique and results. Neurology. 1997; 48(suppl 5): s52–s63 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cooper JD. Video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: commentary. Chest Surg Clin North Am. 1998; 8: 827–834 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mack MJ, Scruggs G. Video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Chest Surg Clin North Am. 1998; 8: 809–825 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Scelsi R, Ferro MT, Scelsi L, et al. Detection and morphology of thymic remnants after video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy (VATET) in patients with myasthenia gravis. Int Surg. 1996; 81: 14–17 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yim APC, Kay RLC, Ho JKS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Chest. 1995; 108: 1440–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ellis K, Austin JHM, Jaretzki A., III Radiologic detection of thymoma in patents with myasthenia gravis. AJR. 1988; 151: 873–881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cheng YU. Video-assisted thoracoscopic management of anterior mediastinal teratoma: Report of a case. Surg Today. 2000; 30: 1019–1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons are provided here courtesy of Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons

RESOURCES