Table 4.
Sensitivity analysis of Studies With Esophageal Lengthening (Collis or Collis-Nissen Gastroplasty) Using a Hypothetical “Worst Case Scenario” (WCS)*
| Study | n= | Recurrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Gastroplasty | ||
| Mattar 2002 | 119 | 8 (6.7%) |
| Diaz 2003 | 110 | 15 (13.6%) |
| Champion 2003 | 34 | 0 |
| Pierre 2002 | 87 | 0 |
| Leeder 2003 | 53 | 5 (9.4%) |
| Ferri 2004 | 35 | 7 (20%) |
| Perdikis 1997 | 65 | 10 (15.3%) |
| Edye 1998 | 55 | 5 (9%) |
| Hashemi 2000 | 27 | 9 (33.3%) |
| Trus 1997 | 70 | 0 (1.4%) |
| Gantert 1998 | 55 | 2 (3.6%) |
| Wiechmann 2001 | 54 | 4 (7.4%) |
| Jobe 2002 | 52 | 11 (21%) |
| Total | 816 | 76 (9.3%) |
| Gastroplasty | ||
| Mattar 2002 | 6 | 6 (100%) |
| Diaz 2003 | 6 | 6 (100%) |
| Champion 2003 | 18 | 1 (5.5%) |
| Pierre 2002 | 113 | 5 (4.4%) |
| Trus 1997 | 6 | 5 (83.3%) |
| Total | 149 | 23 (15.4%) |
*
Recurrences in the given study were attributed to the gastroplasty and the recurrence rate determined for gastroplasty vs nongastroplasty repairs within the given study (9.3% vs 15.4%, P = 0.03).