Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
letter
. 2011 Jan 11;183(1):83–84. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111-2004

Steroids in infection: an old wives’ tale

Errol W Chan 1, S Sanjay 1, Benjamin C Chang 1
PMCID: PMC3017263

We thank Prasad for his comments and agree that there is some evidence for clinical benefit of steroids in terms of survival, functional deficit and symptoms.1 Our comment that steroids should be withheld before excluding an underlying infection in patients with meningitis may be misleading in suggesting that steroids are not useful for bacterial and tuberculous meningitis, because there is some evidence of benefit in these conditions.1 The evidence needs to be reexamined. We also need to individualize treatment.

The conclusion by McGee and Hirschmann that steroids are beneficial and safe for a wide variety of infections1 should not be taken at face value. There are infections (e.g., bacterial meningitis, severe typhoid fever and tetanus) for which the clinical benefit of steroid treatment has not been convincingly shown for all patients. Although some investigators have seen improved outcomes for bacterial meningitis,2,3 others have found no benefit.4,5 Furthermore, the observed clinical benefit of steroids for typhoid fever and tetanus was found in studies that involved only patients with more severe disease.6,7

The application of evidence-based recommendations on treatment should be appropriate to the specific clinical context. The studies of bacterial meningitis included only patients who had supporting evidence of bacterial infection (i.e., cloudy cerebrospinal fluid, bacteria seen on gram stain or white blood cell count > 1000 × 109/L).4,6 Our patient was a 48-year-old woman with meningitis of unknown cause, and clinical assessment of cerebrospinal fluid suggested that the cause was nonbacterial. Furthermore, a risk–benefit analysis suggests that witholding treatment is preferred so as not to aggravate unidentified infections (e.g., fungal) with steroid treatment.

We subsequently diagnosed Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Retrospectively, we find little justification for empirical steroid treatment, given that this disease is not known to cause death or neurologic disability.

References

  • 1.McGee S, Hirschmann J. Use of corticosteroids in treating infectious diseases. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:1034–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Gans J, van de Beek DEuropean Dexamethasone in Adulthood Bacterial Meningitis Study Investigators Dexamethasone in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1549–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lebel MH, Freij BJ, Syrogiannopoulos GA, et al. Dexamethasone therapy for bacterial meningitis. Results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1988;319:964–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van de Beek D, Farrar JJ, de Gans J, et al. Adjunctive dexamethasone in bacterial meningitis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:254–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peltola H, Roine I, Fernández J, et al. Hearing impairment in childhood bacterial meningitis is little relieved by dexamethasone or glycerol. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoffman SL, Punjabi NH, Kumala S, et al. Reduction in mortality in chloramphenicol-treated severe typhoid fever by high-dose dexamethasone. N Engl J Med 1984;310:82–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paydas S, Akoglu TF, Akkiz H, et al. Mortality-lowering effect of systemic corticosteroid therapy in severe tetanus. Clin Ther 1988;10:276–80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES