Skip to main content
BMC Plant Biology logoLink to BMC Plant Biology
. 2010 Oct 7;10:218. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-218

Production of haploids and doubled haploids in oil palm

Jim M Dunwell 1,✉,#, Mike J Wilkinson 2,✉,#, Stephen Nelson 3, Sri Wening 4, Andrew C Sitorus 4, Devi Mienanti 4, Yuzer Alfiko 4, Adam E Croxford 2, Caroline S Ford 2, Brian P Forster 5, Peter DS Caligari 3,5,6
PMCID: PMC3017816  PMID: 20929530

Abstract

Background

Oil palm is the world's most productive oil-food crop despite yielding well below its theoretical maximum. This maximum could be approached with the introduction of elite F1 varieties. The development of such elite lines has thus far been prevented by difficulties in generating homozygous parental types for F1 generation.

Results

Here we present the first high-throughput screen to identify spontaneously-formed haploid (H) and doubled haploid (DH) palms. We secured over 1,000 Hs and one DH from genetically diverse material and derived further DH/mixoploid palms from Hs using colchicine. We demonstrated viability of pollen from H plants and expect to generate 100% homogeneous F1 seed from intercrosses between DH/mixoploids once they develop female inflorescences.

Conclusions

This study has generated genetically diverse H/DH palms from which parental clones can be selected in sufficient numbers to enable the commercial-scale breeding of F1 varieties. The anticipated step increase in productivity may help to relieve pressure to extend palm cultivation, and limit further expansion into biodiverse rainforest.

Background

Success of early F1 hybrid maize varieties exemplifies the advantages of heterosis [1]. The use of doubled haploids as parents for F1 variety production fully exploits this phenomenon and has enabled substantial yield improvements in several crops [2,3]. This strategy was outlined with the first DH crop variety [4] and has led to H/DH production systems being described for > 250 species [5]. However, few of these protocols generate the large numbers of Hs/DHs needed for commercial breeding, with just three methods (androgenesis, wide crossing, gynogenesis [6]) routinely adopted for H/DH production in only 30 species [5]. The most important of these methods in widespread use in commercial breeding is the generation of haploids in maize via pollination with a haploid inducing line such as a 'Stock 6' derivative. Desire for a more generic H/DH production system to improve agricultural yields is increasing as population growth, climate change, biofuel demand and other land-use pressures intensify. Clearly, in any species the production of F1 varieties depends not only on the production of homozygous lines to act as parents, but also it requires an efficient method to intercross the parents. This latter procedure is relatively simple in species with an outcrossing breeding system, like maize or oil palm, compared with those with an inbreeding system like rice or wheat. Production of F1 hybrids has been achieved successfully in this category of crops (for example hybrid rice in China) but often requires a male sterility system.

Annually, oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) yields eight to ten times more oil per hectare than rapeseed or soybean [7,8] and in 2008 generated 38.9 million tonnes of oil worldwide [9]. The area assigned to the crop expanded ~1.7 fold between 1997 (8.7 M ha) and 2007 (14.6 M ha) [9] with further increases forecast. Over this same period global production of palm oil increased ~2.2 fold from 18 to 38.9 Mt y-1. Thus, yield increases have been achieved predominantly by expansion of cultivated area and not through yield enhancement. This trend raises concerns over the ecological impact of felling rainforest to accommodate oil palm cultivation [10,11] and has stimulated debate over strategies to limit further agricultural expansion [12-14]. One option explored here is to use market forces to help address the problem. If F1 varieties could increase yields sufficiently to exceed demand, commodity prices would fall. This would discourage clear felling and simultaneously incentivise early replacement of existing plantations with high-yielding varieties. Feasibility of the approach clearly relies on the ability to gain marked improvements in yield. Current yields of oil palm (generally 4-10.5 t ha-1) [15,16] are much lower than the most conservative estimates of the crop's potential (17 t ha-1 [14] to 60 t ha-1 [16]). Indeed, yields per hectare in the two largest producer countries (Indonesia and Malaysia) have remained static for 30 years [9]. It should be noted, however, that in both these countries there are examples of selected varieties with much higher yields, with the highest yields from commercial breeding trials already exceeding 10 t ha-1.

To date, a H/DH-derived F1 breeding approach has been precluded by the repeated failure to secure H/DHs via anther or microspore culture [17] and successful generation of H/DHs in oil palm is unreported in the literature. The report of a spontaneous H in the related coconut palm [18] and in other species [19] nevertheless gave hope that spontaneous Hs may also occur in oil palm. However, the characteristically rare occurrence of spontaneous H/DHs necessitates development of an effective high-throughput screening system. Phenotypic characteristics of H/DH (slow growth, altered flowering phenology, smaller stomata and smaller organs [5]) could be used for diagnosis but are difficult to score qualitatively on a large scale and require plants of a reasonable size. An alternative strategy is to seek undefined atypical phenotypic features that may arise from reduced cell size and/or the hemizygous state of haploid individuals (homozygous for DHs) and that are manifest at the seedling stage when high-throughput visual assessment is more plausible. A more directed approach is also possible. Spontaneous H/DH seedlings are often associated with aberrant germination features, such as twin embryos from the same carpel [20], providing a defined feature for phenotypic selection. Here, we combined a large-scale visual survey for undefined atypical palm seedling phenotypes coupled with active selection for seeds with twin embryos to assemble a sub-population of seedlings enriched for H/DHs.

Results

Over two years, we performed two large-scale screens for morphological 'off-types' among oil palm seedlings generated by the Bah Lias Research Station, Indonesia. The first screen utilised 10,900,000 seedlings from a wide range of crosses and identified 3,854 morphological 'off-types' (H/DH candidates), of which 53 had twin embryos and 3,801 were phenotypically abnormal (Figure 1). The second screen of approximately 10,000,000 seedlings from commercial seed production activities and approximately 1,000,000 seedlings from breeding experiments generated 5,704 H/DH candidates, of which 5,601 were phenotypically abnormal and 103 had twin embryos. More than 2,000 of these seedlings (including all those with twin embryos) were transferred to the nursery prior to further screening. Although Hs could be identified relatively easily on the basis of their reduced genome size, we initially wished to target the more difficult, but more valuable DHs to circumvent the need for chromosome doubling. For the second level screen, we exploited the fact that Hs and DHs would be either hemi- or homozygous across all loci; thus individuals exhibiting heterozygosity at any locus could be discarded. Applying this logic, we performed a sequential screen using 9-15 microsatellite markers (Table 1) on all individuals and found 117 seedlings that exhibited a single allele across all loci (Table 2). These individuals were retained as candidate H/DH, and subsequent flow cytometry of leaf samples identified 83 as H, and 34 as diploid (Table 2). The haploid status of six palms was further confirmed by cytological examination of intact cells from root squashes. Each contained the expected 16 chromosomes (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Seed germination morphology for H/DH identification. a: normal; b: abnormal; c: twin embryo.

Table 1.

Microsatellite primer pairs used to identify homozygous DH or hemizygous H candidates in the initial molecular screen.

No. Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3')
1 GAGATTACAAAGTCCAAACC TCAAAATTAAGAAAGTATGC
2 ACGCATGCAGCTAGCTTTTC CGCGTGAAAGATATGAATCAAC
3 CACGCACGCAGTTTATTCTT GGATGTATGCTTTACCTCCGAAT
4 CCCCTTTTGCTTCCCTATTT CTCCTTTTCCCCATCACAGA
5 GACACAAGCAAAAACAAAAGCA ATTCTGAAAGGAGGGGGAAA
6 ATATGTGTGGGTGTGCGTGT TGCCTCTGGTTGTTAGTCTGG
7 TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTATGTGTGTGT TGGCAATCAGCACACATTCT
8 GCAGCTCTTTCCACACCTCT TGTGGTCTCCTGAGGAAGATG
9 TTTTCCCCATCACAGAATTG CCCCTTTTGCTTCCCTATTT
10 TAGCCGCACTCCCACGAAGC CCAGAATCATCAGACTCGGACAG
11 AGCTCTCATGCAAGTAAC TTCAACATACCGTCTGTA
12 CCTTCAAGCAAAGATACC GGCACCAAACACAGTAA
13 GTAGCTTGAACCTGAAA AGAACCACCGGAGTTAC
14 GCTCGTTTTTGTTTAGGTGA TTTTCTCCATAGTCCGTTAC
15 CCTCGGGTTATCCTTTTTACC TGGCTGGCTTCGGTCTTAG

Markers 10-15 obtained from Billotte et al. [27].

Table 2.

Results of ploidy analysis by flow cytometry of 117 candidate H/DH palms identified as both morphologically atypical and homozygous for the markers listed in Table 1.

Candidate DNA sample code No. markers used Ploidy
50-Mix5-7 11260406301 9 x
50-03060367C 07280501801 15 x
50-03060260C-2 07280501901 15 x
53-03080954C-2 09270500101 10 x
53-03090761C-5 09280504501 10 x
BATCH 51;03060318C;1 060728_0010_01_a 15 x
BATCH 53;03090761C;5 060728_0018_01_a 15 x
0623/172;05095508C;1 060728_0021_01_a 15 x
BATCH 50;03060260C;2 060728_0027_01_a 15 x
0611/32;05050248C;1 060728_0032_01_a 15 x
0611/16;05050228C;1 060728_0034_01_a 15 x
BATCH 53;03080954C;2 060728_0035_01_a 15 x
06 412;04059061B;3 060728_0050_01_a 14 2x
0628/152;05100720C;1 060729_0021_01_a 15 x
0628/185;05100351C;1 060729_0063_01_a 15 x
BATCH 51;03060626C;1 060729_0127_02_a 15 x
BATCH 67;0409034MC;2 060729_0130_02_a 14 2x
BATCH 67;0409034MC;4 060729_0131_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 67;0409034MC;15 060729_0132_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 65;0409034MC;7 060729_0134_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 65;0409034MC;35 060729_0138_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 65;0409034MC;56 060729_0139_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 65;0409034MC;50 060729_0141_02_a 15 2x
BATCH 65;0409034MC;47 060729_0142_02_a 15 2x
0628/53;05090595C;1 060731_0043_01_a 15 x
0627/125;05090717C;2 060731_0065_01_a 15 x
0627/12;05080220C;1 060731_0080_01_a 15 x
0627/6;05080095C;1 060731_0086_01_a 14 x
0631/Normal;05039033B;31 060731_0265_01_a 14 x
64-0409021MC-34 02130604301 15 2x
64-0410040MC-1 02130604801 15 2x
51-03060626C 02130605301 15 x
64-0410040MC-20 02140600401 15 2x
64-0410040MC-16 02140600801 15 2x
65-0409021MC-2 02140601001 15 2x
06 412B-04059061B-3 02170605501 15 2x
06 412B-04129091B 02170605801 15 2x
0550-15/05010827C 02200602401 15 x
0550-17/05010442C-1 02200602601 15 x
0550-23/05020059C 02200603101 15 x
0550-33/05020568C 02200603401 15 x
0550-36/05020420C-2 02200603701 15 x
0550-40/05010880C 02200607501 14 x
0551-36/05020511C 02200607601 15 x
0551-32/05020361C-1 02210600401 15 x
0552-4/05010836C-2 02210600901 15 x
0552-38/05020501C 02210603101 14 x
0552-39/05020415C 02210603201 15 x
0552-31/05020858C 02210603701 15 x
0552-91/05020375C 02210603901 15 x
0552-111/05020626C 02210607201 15 x
0552-128/05020558C-1 02210607701 15 x
0601-35/05020946C 02210608201 15 x
0601-42/05030201C-6 02210609501 15 x
0601-51/05030224C-2 02220600201 15 x
0607-21/05040317C-3 02220601801 14 x
0606-32/05040240C 02220606201 13 x
0601-77/05020961C 02230600701 15 x
0601-62/05030147C 02230601401 15 x
0601-54/05030462C 02230601901 15 x
0551-21/05020271C-1 02200605801 14 x
0601-9/05020843C-2 02230603101 15 x
0602-17/05020631C-1 02230605501 15 x
0607-111/05040970C-1 03010600201 15 x
0607-81/05040578C-1 03010600501 15 x
0607-73/05040573C-1 03010605101 15 x
0607-89/05040748C-3 03010605501 15 x
0607-102/05050016C-2 03010606601 15 x
0608-15/05040519C-3 03010606901 15 x
0608-45/05041003C-1 03150603401 15 x
0610-60/05041024C-2 03150604401 15 x
0610-124/05055039C-1 03150604601 15 x
0609-54/05050089C-2 03150604701 15 x
0610-41/05050352C-1 03150606701 15 x
0609-58/05050255C-1 03220600201 15 x
0610-82/05050099C-2 03220601401 15 x
0610-77/05050353C-1 03220602701 15 x
0610-121/05055090C-1 03220603301 15 x
0610-81/05050099C-1 03220605901 15 x
0609-100/05055311C-1 03290600301 15 x
0610-11/05040938C-1 03290601101 15 x
0610-68/05050376C-3 03290602001 15 x
0610-58/05050344C-1 03290602201 15 x
0610-73/05050594C-3 03290603301 15 x
0611-84/05050714C-4 03290605001 15 x
0611-70/05050223C-1 03290606701 15 x
0611-73/05050351C-1 03290608001 15 x
0610-67/05050376C-2 04050600501 15 x
0610-40/05050102C-2 04050600901 15 x
0611-99/05050544C-1 04050602601 15 x
0611-110/05055011C-1 04050603601 15 x
0612-2/05050017C-1 04050609101 15 x
0612-70/05050530C-1 04050609201 15 x
0612-76/05050512C-1 04050610301 15 x
0611-109/05055144C-1 04120600101 15 x
0611-31/05050220C-1 04120600601 15 x
0611-38/05050284C-4 04120600901 15 x
0611-40/05050171C-1 04120601101 14 x
0612-80/05050713C-1 04120603101 15 x
65-0409034 MC-66 060829_0001_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-68 060829_0002_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-72 060829_0003_02_a 14 2x
65-0409034 MC-111 060829_0005_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-94 060829_0011_02_a 14 2x
65-0409034 MC-120 060829_0012_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-144 060829_0013_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-133 060829_0015_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-187 060829_0020_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-193 060829_0021_02_a 14 2x
65-0409034 MC-199 060829_0023_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-135 060829_0025_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-114 060829_0026_02_a 13 2x
65-0409034 MC-147 060829_0027_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-36 B 060829_0030_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-39 A 060829_0031_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-73 A 060829_0034_02_a 15 2x
65-0409034 MC-71 A 060829_0035_02_a 14 2x

Note: in this initial round, no DH was found. The DH (0644-219/05049582C) was detected in a subsequent batch.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Chromosome spread of a haploid root cell from oil palm containing 16 C-metaphase chromosomes.

A larger-scale survey for heterozygosity was then performed using 97 additional microsatellites (Table 3) to confirm absolute hemizygosity of Hs and identify 'false' candidate DHs showing any heterozygosity. All Hs produced single-allele peak profiles across all microsatellites, thereby discounting fixed heterozygosity via locus duplication for all markers used. All diploids were heterozygous at several loci and so discarded. However, one diploid (0644-219/05049582C) identified from a later screen (see below) was homozygous across all 36 mapped loci found to be heterozygous in the maternal parent (palm number BL013/12-06). Taking account of linkage between mapped markers, the probability of such an individual occurring by chance following selfing was 8.72 × 10-8 (see Methods). This palm was therefore deemed a spontaneous DH.

Table 3.

Microsatellite markers (described by Billotte et al. [27]) used for a larger-scale survey for hemizygosity of Hs and homozygosity of DH candidates previously identified by the morphological screen, microsatellite pre-screen (15 markers) and flow cytometry screen.

No. Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3')
16 GACCTTTGTCAGCATACTTGGTGTG GCAGGCCTGAAATCCCAAAT
17 ATGCATGTGATTTTATTAGGTGAGA CGACCCTCAGTCAATCAGTAAG
18 AAGCTAGCGACCTATGATTTTAGA AAACAAGTAATGTGCATAACCTTTC
19 CCCACCACCCCTAGCTTCTC ACCCCGGTCCAAATAAAATC
20 AGAGAGAGAGAGTGCGTATG GTCCCTGTGGCTGCTGTTTC
21 GGGTAGCAAACCTTGTATTA ACTTCCATTGTCTCATTATTCT
22 CGAGGCCCAAAAACATTCAC GGTCCCGATCCCGTCTACTG
23 TTGCGGCCCATCGTAATC TCCCTGCAGTGTCCCTCTTT
24 AGGGAATTGGAAGAAAAGAAAG TCCTGAGCTGGGGTGGTC
25 AGCAAGAGCAAGAGCAGAACT CTTGGGGGCTTCGCTATC
26 TAGCCATGCCGCCACCACTT CAATCCATTAGCGTGCCCTTCT
27 CTTACCCCGCCTCCTCTCCT CGAAATGCCCTTCCTTTACACTA
28 CCTTATATCGCACGGGTTCC TTCTTGGGGTCTCGCTACGG
29 GCAAGATGCAATGGAGTTCA CAAACCGCAGCAAGTCAGA
30 GCAAAATTCAAAGAAAACTTA CTGACAGTGCAGAAAATGTTATAGT
31 CGTTCATCCCACCACCTTTC GCTGCGAGGCCACTGATAC
32 GAATGTGGCTGTAAATGCTGAGTG AAGCCGCATGGACAACTCTAGTAA
33 ACATTCCCTCTATTATTCTCAC GTTTTGTTTGGTATGCTTGT
34 AAGCCAACTTCACAGATATGTTGAT ATGAGCCTAACAAAGCACATTCTAA
35 AGTGAGGTATGGTTGATTAGGA TATTGATAGCATTTGGGATTAG
36 CTCCGATGGTCAAGTCAGA AAATGGGGAAGGCAATAGTG
37 GCCGTTCAAGTCAATTAGAC TTTGGGAGCAAGCATTATCA
38 TGCTTCTTGTCCTTGATACA CCACGTCTACGAAATGATAA
39 CACCACATGAAGCAAGCAGT CCTACCACAACCCCAGTCTC
40 TTTTATTTTCCCTCTCTTTTGA ATTGCGTCTCTTTCCATTGA
41 CATATGGCGCACAGGCAC GCAATACAAGAGCACCCAAAT
42 AGTTGGTTTGCTGATTTG TGTTGCTTCTTTGATTTTC
43 GCTGAAGATGAAATTGATGTA TTCAGGTCCACTTTCATTTA
44 ATGACCTAAAAATAAAATCTCAT ACAGATCATGCTTGCTCACA
45 GGTGCAAGAGAGGAGGAATG TTTGGTAGTCGGGCGTTTTA
46 GTTTGGCTTTGGACATG TCCATCACAGGAGGTATAG
47 TGTTTTGTTTCGTGCATGTG GGCTGACATGCAACACTAAC
48 CGGTTTTGTCGCATCTATG GTCGTCAGGGAACAACAGT
49 CAATCATTGGCGAGAGA CGTCACCTTTCAGGATATG
50 GAGCATGACGCAAACAAAGG GCAACATGTTTGATGCATTAATAGTC
51 TCCAAGTAGCAAATGATGAC TGCCCTGAAACCCTTGA
52 GAAGGGGCATTGGATTT TACCTATTACAGCGAGAGTG
53 AACACTCCAGAAGCCAGGTC GGTTTAGGTATTGGAACTGATAGAC
54 GATCCCAATGGTAAAGACT AAGCCTCAAAAGAAGACC
55 TGTGGTTTGAGGCATCTTCT GCCCACCAAAAGAAAGTAGT
56 TAGCCGCACTCCCACGAAGC CCAGAATCATCAGACTCGGACAG
57 TCAAAGAGCCGCACAACAAG ACTTTGCTGCTTGGTGACTTA
58 GGGGATGAGTTTGTTTGTTC CCTGCTTGGCGAGATGA
59 TCTAATGCTCCCAAGGTACA GGCTTGGTCCACGATCTT
60 AGCTCTCATGCAAGTAAC TTCAACATACCGTCTGTA
61 TCCTCACTGCTCCTCTAATC ACTCCCTATGGACCTTAGTC
62 AGGGAGGCGAACGAGAAACA CGACTGCTGATGGGGAAGAG
63 CTACGGACTCACACCTATAT ATGGTTCATCAATGAGATC
64 GTGAGCGATTGAGGGGTGTG GGGGCTTGATTGAGTATTTCCA
65 AGGGCAAGTCATGTTTC TATAAGGGCGAGGTATT
66 GAAGCCTGAGACCGCATAGA TTCGGTGATGAAGATTGAAG
67 TTTCTTATGGCAATCACACG GGAGGGCAGGAACAAAAAGT
68 GTTTATCATTTTGGGGTCAG CGGTGTCCCTCAGGATGTA
69 CATGCACGTAAAGAAAGTGT CCAAATGCACCCTAAGA
70 AATCCAAGTGGCCTACAG CATGGCTTTGCTCAGTCA
71 TGTAGGTGGTGGTTAGG TGTCAGACCCACCATTA
72 AGCAAGACACCATGTAGTC GACACGTGGGATCTAGAC
73 AAAAGCCGATAGTGGGAACA ATGCTGAGAGGTGGAAAATAGAG
74 GTCCATGTGCATAAGAGAG CTCTTGGCATTTCAGATAC
75 AGCCAATGAAGGATAAAGG CAAGCTAAAACCCCTAATC
76 CAATTCCAGCGTCACTATAG AGTGGCAGTGGAAAAACAGT
77 GGGCTTTCATTTTCCACTAT GCTCAACCTCATCCACAC
78 GACAGCTCGTGATGTAGA GTTCTTGGCCGCTATAT
79 ACTTGTAAACCCTCTTCTCA GTTTCATTACTTGGCTTCTG
80 CCTTCAAGCAAAGATACC GGCACCAAACACAGTAA
81 CCACTGCTTCAAATTTACTAG GCGTCCAAAACATAAATCAC
82 GGGAGAGGAAAAAATAGAG CCTCCCTGAGACTGAGAAG
83 AGCAGGGCAAGAGCAATACT TTCAGCAGCAGGAAACATC
84 GCCTATCCCCTGAACTATCT TGCACATACCAGCAACAGAG
85 CATCAGAGCCTTCAAACTAC AGCCTGAATTGCCTCTC
86 ATTCATTGCCATTCCCTTCA TTGTCCCCTCTGTTCACTCA
87 ATTGCAGAGATGATGAGAAG GAGATGCTGACAATGGTAGA
88 TCTCCCAAATCACTAGAC ATCTGCAAGGCATATTC
89 ACGTTTTGGCAACTCTC ACTCCCCTCTTTGACAT
90 TCCACTCTGGCAACTCC AAGGATGGGCTTTGTAGT
91 TTTAGAGGACAAGGAGATAAG CGACCGTGTCAAGAGTG
92 AGCAAAATGGCAAAGGAGAG GGTGTGTGCTATGGAAGATCATAGT
93 GTAGCTTGAACCTGAAA AGAACCACCGGAGTTAC
94 AAGCCACCAGGATCATC GTCATTGCCACCTCTAACT
95 TTACTTGCTAAGCTCTCTAGC TGGCTGTTTAATCTGTCTG
96 TCTATATTTGGTTGGCTTGA ACTCATTTCAATCTCAGTGTC
97 TGCTACGTGCTGAAATA ATTTCAGGTTCGCTTCA
98 CCTCCACTTCTCTTCATCTT CTTCCTCAAGCTCAAACAAT
99 GATGTTGCCGCTGTTTG CATCCCATTTCCCTCTT
100 ATGCTCCACCAAGTTTA CACATCCTAGCATCATTG
101 AAGCAATATAGGTTCAGTTC TCATTTTCTAATTCCAAACAAG
102 GCTCGTTTTTGTTTAGGTGA TTTTCTCCATAGTCCGTTAC
103 CAGCACACAAATGACAT CACCTTTCCTTTTTGTC
104 CCTATTCCTTACCTTTCTGT GACTTACTATCTTGGCTCAC
105 CCTTGCATTCCACTATT AGTTCTCAAGCCTCACA
106 CCTCCTTTGGAATTATG GTGTTTGATGGGACATACA
107 ATTGGAGAGCACTTGGATAG TTCTCTTCCTTCTCACTTGT
108 AGCCAGATGGAAATACAC GTGCGATAAAGAGGAGAGT
109 TAGTTTTCCCATCACAGAGT ACAATATTTAGACCTTCCATGAG
110 GTGCAGATGCAGATTATATG CCTTTAGAATTGCCGTATC
111 ACAATAACCTGAGACAACAAGAAAC ATACATCCCCTCCCCTCTCT
112 GAACTTGGCGTGTAACT TGGTAGGTCTATTTGAGAGT

These initial screens collectively revealed 83 spontaneous Hs but no DHs (although one DH was discovered subsequently), with the undirected phenotypic 'off-type' selection proving substantially more effective than screening for twin embryos. This result suggests that our method could be used to secure large numbers of Hs but is less able to isolate DHs at useful frequencies. This finding, when coupled with the routine nature of H chromosome doubling in other crops [21], suggested the most promising route for commercial DH production lay in the isolation of Hs followed by somatic doubling. In subsequent screening of abnormal seedlings, high-throughput flow cytometry therefore replaced molecular analysis for candidate H identification. Haploid identity was then supported using at least 15 microsatellite markers. Plants identified as diploid by flow cytometry continued to be screened for DHs as above. Using this amended screening procedure, we have identified over 1,100 H palms from approximately 60 million seedlings (to July 2009).

To have maximum utility this H/DH material should encompass as much genetic diversity from within the breeding germplasm as possible. A Principal Coordinates Analysis performed on H profiles using 28 microsatellite loci showed the first two axes accounted for 58% of the detected variation. While most Hs had a strong affinity to commercial duras, Hs have also been generated from pisifera types and overall variability amongst Hs encompassed that seen for the entire commercial palm material (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Principal Coordinates Analysis Plot of 95 diploid and 27 haploid palms based on 28 microsatellites. Red diamonds: haploids; green squares: commercial pisiferas; blue triangles: commercial teneras; yellow diamonds: commercial duras; purple diamonds: Ghanaian wild material. Microsatellite data in Table 7.

Effort then focussed on the creation of DHs from this rich germplasm of H genotypes (Figure 4). The most direct route to obtain DHs is to use chemical application to induce chromosome doubling. We applied a range of treatments to 50 H seedlings and screened leaves of the recovered material for evidence of chromosome doubling. Flow cytometry revealed that 48 seedlings contained substantial diploid sectors in their leaves; one palm was 100% doubled after exposure to10 mM colchicine (Figure 5) and 100 ppm GA3. To date, 16 H genotypes have produced pollen. This finding demonstrates scope for securing fertile gametes from diploid inflorescences or inflorescence sectors for DH or F1 production. Indeed, seed set using pollen from DH material has now been achieved (data not shown). Whilst further optimization work is required, our results when combined with experience in other crops [21] suggest routine production of fertile DH oil palm lines will be a relatively simple task.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Selection of haploid oil palm plants growing in a nursery.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Doubled haploid palm.

Discussion and Conclusions

The simple high-throughput phenotypic-genotypic seedling selection system used here provides a fourth practical approach to supplement androgenesis, wide crossing and gynogenesis [6] and has potential for many crops where H/DH production remains elusive. The prospect of adopting a similar untargeted approach more widely seems both plausible and attractive, and may be possible without experienced operators, especially as sophisticated phenomic screening systems [22] become more accessible.

In the case of oil palm, the efficacy of our H screening combined with the demonstrated ability to create DH palms, opens the way for the development of 100% true-breeding parental clones for F1 variety breeding. Thereafter, it is hoped that the potential genetic gain available from oil palm F1 hybrids will match that in other crops. If such a gain is achieved it could be beneficial in several ways. First, high-yielding F1 palms are likely to accelerate replacement of palms in existing plantations and cause a step-increase in production. Secondly, this breeding strategy provides greater flexibility for breeders to respond rapidly to emergent threats (e.g. climate change). Thirdly, using palm oil and its associated wastes for energy generation [7] could substantially reduce carbon-based emissions currently associated with the palm oil lifecycle [23]. Fourthly, DH oil palms could be exploited in combination with transgenic techniques that are now available for this crop [24]. Looking forward, the clear challenge is to maintain and improve oil palm productivity in the face of a changing climate sufficient to keep pace with growing demand [25]. However, it is important to point out that breeding is simply one stage in a long process from plantation to the eventual processed product and the economic realities of this international industry will finally determine the impact of any novel technology on the global agricultural system for this crop.

The provision here of a system for haploid-based F1 hybrid breeding in oil palm represents the first technological breakthrough likely to lead to step improvements in yield for this crop, and can also be applied to other crops recalcitrant to in vitro based H/DH systems. This methodology, in particular the application of high-throughput flow cytometry, has recently been applied successfully to two other tropical crops, namely rubber (Hevea brasiliensis L.) and cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) (Nasution et al. unpublished).

Methods

Hs and DHs were identified using three methods: a morphological screen; homozygosity/hemizygosity assessment; and ploidy level measurement. Initial screens emphasized identification of candidate DHs where seedling morphology screening was followed by homozygosity/hemizygosity assessment using microsatellites. H/DHs were then distinguished by flow cytometry and DHs subjected to an extensive homozygosity screen (Figure 6). As spontaneous DH frequency was low, later screens emphasized H recovery where the morphological screen was followed by flow cytometry; homozygosity of candidate Hs was thereafter confirmed with microsatellites.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Summary of stages for identification of haploid and doubled haploid palm.

Seed morphological screen

For seed storage, mesocarps were removed from freshly harvested seed, and seeds air-dried at ambient temperature (24 h). Seeds were thereafter stored at 25°C with 15-18% moisture content. To induce germination, stored seeds were re-hydrated over 3 d to 18-20% moisture content, followed by 38-40°C incubation (40-60 d). Seeds were then re-hydrated for a further 5 d to >22% moisture content, and air-dried at ambient temperature (4 h). Seeds were germinated at ambient temperature (7 d to 3 months after treatment) and examined for atypical germination morphology (Figure 1).

Molecular pre-screen to exclude heterozygotes

DNA was isolated from leaf tissue using DNeasy 96 Plant Kit (Qiagen, UK). Initial heterozygosity screens used 15 microsatellites (Table 1) yielding alleles readily distinguished by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 7). 10 μl PCR mixes comprised 1.0 μl 10× NH4 buffer (Bioline), 0.3 μl MgCl2 (10 mM), 0.4 μl dNTPs (10 mM), 0.2 μl each primer (10 mM), 1-5 ng DNA and 1U Taq polymerase (Bioline). Thermocycling conditions: 2 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 52-58°C for 30 s and 72°C for 45 s, with a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. Candidates presenting two allelic bands after fractionation by (2-3% w/v metaphor) agarose gel electrophoresis were discarded.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

PCR amplicons generated by microsatellite marker 10 fractionated in 2% w/v agarose. Lanes 1-11 & 12-20: candidate H/DH palm plants; lane L: HyperladderI (Bioline, UK); lane 21: heterozygote control; lane 22: homozygote control. Candidates in lanes 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20 were deemed heterozygous and discarded.

Extended molecular screen

Candidate DHs and some Hs were subjected to an extensive assay for heterozygosity using 97 fluorescently-labelled microsatellites (Table 3) with 150 seedlings of normal phenotype and 24 heterozygous tenera palms as controls. PCR conditions were as described above and resultant products were fractionated on an ABI3730XL capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) by Macrogen Inc (Korea). Allele size was determined (Genemapper v4.0) against a GS400HD standard. Individuals with two alleles at any locus were discarded.

DH candidate verification

To verify DH candidate 0644-219/05049582C we screened 212 microsatellites (Table 4) for heterozygosity in the maternal parent (BL013/12-06). 10 μl PCR mixes comprising: 5 μl BioMix™(Bioline, UK), 0.05 μl forward primer plus M13 adaptor (10 μM), 0.2 μl labelled M13(-29) (10 μM) (Sigma Genosys, UK), 0.2 μl reverse primer (10 μM) and 5-10 ng DNA were subjected to: 2 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 52°C, 45 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. Amplicons were surveyed for heterozygosity by high-resolution melt (HRM) analysis according to Croxford et al. [26] using the candidate as the reference comparator. Samples with amplicons variable between the maternal parent and candidate DH were fractionated by capillary electrophoresis as above. 48 markers identified as heterozygous in the maternal parent (Table 5) were applied to the DH candidate to assess homozygosity.

Table 4.

Microsatellite markers used to screen for heterozygosity on the maternal parent (palm BL013/12-06) of DH candidate palm (0644-219/05049582C).

No Marker Forward Primer (5'-3') Reverse Primer (5'-3')
1 VS1 GAGATTACAAAGTCCAAACC TCAAAATTAAGAAAGTATGC
2 OPSSR 3 ACGCATGCAGCTAGCTTTTC CGCGTGAAAGATATGAATCAAC
3 OPSSR 7 CACGCACGCAGTTTATTCTT GGATGTATGCTTTACCTCCGAAT
4 OPSSR 8 CCCCTTTTGCTTCCCTATTT CTCCTTTTCCCCATCACAGA
5 OPSSR 9 GACACAAGCAAAAACAAAAGCA ATTCTGAAAGGAGGGGGAAA
6 OPSSR 14 ATATGTGTGGGTGTGCGTGT TGCCTCTGGTTGTTAGTCTGG
7 OPSSR 19 TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTATGTGTGTGT TGGCAATCAGCACACATTCT
8 OPSSR 29 GCAGCTCTTTCCACACCTCT TGTGGTCTCCTGAGGAAGATG
9 OPSSR 30 TTTTCCCCATCACAGAATTG CCCCTTTTGCTTCCCTATTT
10 OPSSR32 GAACAAAACGGGAAGAAGCA CCTCAAATGGGAGAAACCAG
11 mEgUWA07 CGGATAGAGGCAGCAAGACT CTCGGGTTGTTTAACCCATT
12 mEgUWA44 TTGAGACGTCGTTCCTTTCC AGCGGAGACCCAATAATCCT
13 mEgUWA50 CCTGCAACTGCAAATGAGAC TCCAGACACAAACTACACACACC
14 mEgCIR0037 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
15 mEgCIR0055 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
16 mEgCIR0059 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
17 mEgCIR0067 Published by Billotte et al. [28]
18 mEgCIR0074 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
19 mEgCIR0146 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
20 mEgCIR0163 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
21 mEgCIR0173 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
22 mEgCIR0177 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
23 mEgCIR0192 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
24 mEgCIR0195 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
25 mEgCIR0243 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
26 mEgCIR0246 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
27 mEgCIR0257 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
28 mEgCIR0268 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
29 mEgCIR0328 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
30 mEgCIR0359 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
31 mEgCIR0366 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
32 mEgCIR0369 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
33 mEgCIR0380 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
34 mEgCIR0399 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
35 mEgCIR0408 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
36 mEgCIR0409 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
37 mEgCIR0425 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
38 mEgCIR0433 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
39 mEgCIR0439 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
40 mEgCIR0445 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
41 mEgCIR0446 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
42 mEgCIR0465 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
43 mEgCIR0521 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
44 mEgCIR0551 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
45 mEgCIR0555 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
46 mEgCIR0588 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
47 mEgCIR0772 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
48 mEgCIR0773 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
49 mEgCIR0774 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
50 mEgCIR0775 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
51 mEgCIR0778 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
52 mEgCIR0779 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
53 mEgCIR0781 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
54 mEgCIR0786 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
55 mEgCIR0787 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
56 mEgCIR0788 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
57 mEgCIR0790 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
58 mEgCIR0793 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
59 mEgCIR0800 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
60 mEgCIR0801 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
61 mEgCIR0802 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
62 mEgCIR0803 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
63 mEgCIR0804 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
64 mEgCIR0825 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
65 mEgCIR0827 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
66 mEgCIR0844 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
67 mEgCIR0874 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
68 mEgCIR0878 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
69 mEgCIR0882 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
70 mEgCIR0886 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
71 mEgCIR0894 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
72 mEgCIR0905 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
73 mEgCIR0906 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
74 mEgCIR0910 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
75 mEgCIR0912 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
76 mEgCIR1729 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
77 mEgCIR1740 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
78 mEgCIR1753 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
79 mEgCIR1773 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
80 mEgCIR1917 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
81 mEgCIR1977 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
82 mEgCIR1996 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
83 mEgCIR2110 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
84 mEgCIR2144 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
85 mEgCIR2149 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
86 mEgCIR2188 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
87 mEgCIR2212 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
88 mEgCIR2215 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
89 mEgCIR2380 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
90 mEgCIR2387 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
91 mEgCIR2414 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
92 mEgCIR2417 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
93 mEgCIR2422 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
94 mEgCIR2423 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
95 mEgCIR2427 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
96 mEgCIR2436 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
97 mEgCIR2440 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
98 mEgCIR2492 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
99 mEgCIR2518 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
100 mEgCIR2525 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
101 mEgCIR2569 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
102 mEgCIR2575 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
103 mEgCIR2577 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
104 mEgCIR2590 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
105 mEgCIR2595 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
106 mEgCIR2600 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
107 mEgCIR2621 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
108 mEgCIR2628 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
109 mEgCIR2763 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
110 mEgCIR2813 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
111 mEgCIR2860 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
112 mEgCIR2887 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
113 mEgCIR2893 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
114 mEgCIR3040 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
115 mEgCIR3111 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
116 mEgCIR3160 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
117 mEgCIR3194 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
118 mEgCIR3213 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
119 mEgCIR3232 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
120 mEgCIR3295 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
121 mEgCIR3296 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
122 mEgCIR3297 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
123 mEgCIR3298 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
124 mEgCIR3300 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
125 mEgCIR3301 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
126 mEgCIR3305 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
127 mEgCIR3307 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
128 mEgCIR3310 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
129 mEgCIR3311 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
130 mEgCIR3316 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
131 mEgCIR3321 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
132 mEgCIR3328 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
133 mEgCIR3350 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
134 mEgCIR3384 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
135 mEgCIR3389 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
136 mEgCIR3399 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
137 mEgCIR3400 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
138 mEgCIR3402 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
139 mEgCIR3427 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
140 mEgCIR3428 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
141 mEgCIR3433 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
142 mEgCIR3439 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
143 mEgCIR3477 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
144 mEgCIR3519 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
145 mEgCIR3526 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
146 mEgCIR3533 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
147 mEgCIR3534 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
148 mEgCIR3535 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
149 mEgCIR3538 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
150 mEgCIR3543 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
151 mEgCIR3544 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
152 mEgCIR3546 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
153 mEgCIR3555 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
154 mEgCIR3557 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
155 mEgCIR3563 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
156 mEgCIR3567 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
157 mEgCIR3569 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
158 mEgCIR3574 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
159 mEgCIR3587 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
160 mEgCIR3590 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
161 mEgCIR3592 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
162 mEgCIR3593 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
163 mEgCIR3607 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
164 mEgCIR3622 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
165 mEgCIR3633 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
166 mEgCIR3639 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
167 mEgCIR3643 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
168 mEgCIR3649 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
169 mEgCIR3653 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
170 mEgCIR3655 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
171 mEgCIR3663 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
172 mEgCIR3668 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
173 mEgCIR3672 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
174 mEgCIR3683 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
175 mEgCIR3684 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
176 mEgCIR3691 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
177 mEgCIR3693 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
178 mEgCIR3696 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
179 mEgCIR3698 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
180 mEgCIR3705 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
181 mEgCIR3711 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
182 mEgCIR3716 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
183 mEgCIR3718 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
184 mEgCIR3722 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
185 mEgCIR3727 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
186 mEgCIR3728 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
187 mEgCIR3732 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
188 mEgCIR3737 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
189 mEgCIR3739 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
190 mEgCIR3745 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
191 mEgCIR3747 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
192 mEgCIR3750 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
193 mEgCIR3755 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
194 mEgCIR3766 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
195 mEgCIR3769 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
196 mEgCIR3775 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
197 mEgCIR3782 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
198 mEgCIR3785 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
199 mEgCIR3787 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
200 mEgCIR3788 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
201 mEgCIR3792 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
202 mEgCIR3807 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
203 mEgCIR3808 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
204 mEgCIR3809 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
205 mEgCIR3813 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
206 mEgCIR3819 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
207 mEgCIR3825 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
208 mEgCIR3826 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
209 mEgCIR3828 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
210 mEgCIR3847 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
211 mEgCIR3850 Published by Billotte et al. [27]
212 mEgCIR3869 Published by Billotte et al. [27]

Table 5.

Markers shown to be heterozygous in the maternal parent (palm BL013/12-06) and homozygous in the DH candidate (0644-219/05049582C).

No Marker Linkage Group
1 mEgCIR0268 1
2 mEgCIR0874 1
3 mEgCIR3847 1
4 mEgCIR2149 2
5 mEgCIR2518 3
6 mEgCIR0425 3
7 mEgCIR3544 3
8 mEgCIR3716 4
9 mEgCIR1917 4
10 mEgCIR3535 4
11 mEgCIR3310 4
12 mEgCIR3705 4
13 mEgCIR3477 4
14 mEgCIR0059 4
15 mEgCIR3557 4
16 mEgCIR2813 5
17 mEgCIR3543 6
18 mEgCIR0195 6
19 mEgCIR0894 7
20 mEgCIR0905b 7
21 mEgCIR0774 8
22 mEgCIR2440 8
23 mEgCIR0825 10
24 mEgCIR3826 10
25 mEgCIR0788 10
26 mEgCIR2628 10
27 mEgCIR0146 10
28 mEgCIR0878 11
29 mEgCIR1773 12
30 mEgCIR3311 12
31 mEgCIR0779 14
32 mEgCIR0588 14
33 mEgCIR3737 15
34 mEgCIR3850 15
35 mEgCIR3639 16
36 mEgCIR0905a 16
37 mEgCIR3739 unlinked
38 mEgCIR3160 unmapped
39 mEgCIR3360 unmapped
40 mEgCIR0801 unmapped
41 mEgCIR2577 unmapped
42 OPSSR14 unmapped
43 OPSSR30 unmapped
44 OPSSR32 unmapped
45 mEgUWA44 unmapped
46 mEgUWA50 unmapped
47 mEgUWA07 unmapped
48 VS1 unmapped

Linkage group assigned according to Billotte et al. [27].

DH candidate 0644-219/05049582C was found to be homozygous across all 48 loci that were heterozygous in its maternal parent. Of these 48 loci, 36 have been mapped by Billotte et al. [27] (Table 5). We first considered the probability of obtaining the observed homozygosity levels via independent assortment using only the unlinked markers from this group. For unlinked loci, the probability of homozygous offspring arising by independent assortment is 0.5 per locus. Given that heterozygous loci were secured from 14 of the 16 linkage groups, with the addition of a further unlinked (unassigned) marker, the probability of these markers all becoming homozygous by chance is therefore: P = 0.515 = 0.000030517578125.

This figure was further reduced by the inclusion of the remaining 21 markers that had been assigned a map position [27]. Here, linkage was accommodated by multiplying by 1-(distance in cM/100). Thus the inclusion of a new marker 10 cM from an existing marker would mean multiplying the cumulative total by 1- (10/100) = 1-0.1 = 0.9 (rather than 0.5 for an unlinked marker). This reduced the probability as follows:

P=0.000030517578125×(extra markers from Linkage Group 1, LG1)0.92×0.92×(extramarkers from LG3) 0.81×0.93×(LG4)0.86×0.62×0.55×0.88×0.95×0.87×(LG6)0.9×(LG7)0.93×(LG8)0.52×(LG10)0.93×0.94×0.87×0.83×(LG12)0.5×(LG14)0.5×(LG15)0.6×(LG16)0.51=8.72×108.

Flow Cytometry

Newly matured leaflets or radicles from candidate H/DH palms were subjected to flow cytometry according to Anumaganathan & Earle [29] to establish ploidy level. Commercial tenera palms were included as diploid controls. For high-throughput mass screening, tissue samples were bulked at a rate of five individual tissue samples per bulk. Bulked samples (about 0.5 cm2 for radicles and 1 cm2 for leaf material (per each individual) were sliced by chopping with a sharp clean razor-blade (20-30 chops), in a plastic 9 cm diameter Petri dish containing 1.5 ml of cold (5°C) CyStain® UV Ploidy solution (Partec, Germany) modified by addition of 6.48 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1% (v/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-40) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The addition of DTT and PVP-40 were found to reduce background counts ('noise') in output histograms of particle fluorescence in the analyte.

Confirmation of Hs by chromosome squashes

Harvested roots were pre-treated in iced water (24 h), then fixed in 3:1 v/v alcohol: glacial acetic acid at 4°C (24 h). They were then rinsed in water, softened in 1N HCl (20 min), rinsed in water (2 min) and stained in saturated aceto-orcein (1 min). The root tip was then squashed, mounted onto a glass slide, and examined using a compound photomicroscope.

Principal Coordinates Analysis

The genetic affinity of 270 Hs was compared with 95 representative diploids (Table 6) using 28 microsatellites (Table 7) by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). The PCoA was constructed using GenAlEx v6 [30]. Genetic distance option 'codominant-genotypic' was applied, where pairwise, individual-by-individual (N × N) genetic distances are calculated for codominant data. For a single-locus analysis, with i-th, j-th, k-th and l-th different alleles, a set of squared distances is defined as d2(ii, ii) = 0, d2(ij, ij) = 0, d2(ii, ij) = 1, d2(ij, ik) = 1, d2(ij, kl) = 2, d2(ii, jk) = 3, and d2(ii, jj) = 4. The algorithm used in GenAlEx is based on Orloci [31] using distance matrix with standardization (by dividing the distance inputs by the square root of n-1). Here, Hs were treated as the DHs they were assumed to generate; thus genotypes were homozygous not hemizygous.

Table 6.

Identification codes, oil palm type and ploidy level of oil palm genotypes used in the Principal Coordinates Analysis

No Label no in PCO Sample name in PCO Palm Id Ploidy level
1 1 haploid 05020271_0001 x

2 2 haploid 05050099_0001 x

3 3 haploid 05050099_0002 x

4 4 haploid 05020961_0001 x

5 5 haploid 05020511_0001 x

6 6 haploid 05020946_0001 x

7 8 haploid 05030147_0001 x

8 9 haploid 05030462_0001 x

9 10 haploid 05020420_0002 x

10 11 haploid 05020361_0001 x

11 12 haploid 05030060_0001 x

12 13 haploid 05020558_0001 x

13 14 haploid 05020631_0001 x

14 15 haploid 05040748_0003 x

15 16 haploid 05030308_0001 x

16 18 haploid 05080318_0003 x

17 19 haploid 06020186_0001 x

18 20 haploid 05110212_0001 x

19 21 haploid 05120555_0001 x

20 22 haploid 06011022_0001 x

21 23 haploid 05020059_0001 x

22 24 haploid 06020320_0004 x

23 25 haploid 06020571_0004 x

24 26 haploid 06020381_0001 x

25 27 haploid 05060119_0001 x

26 28 haploid 05090172_0001 x

27 30 haploid 05100321_0001 x

28 31 haploid 06010670_0006 x

29 32 haploid 06010842_0004 x

30 33 haploid 05050228_0001 x

31 34 haploid 05110260_0001 x

32 35 haploid 05110260_0002 x

33 36 haploid 05110162_0001 x

34 37 haploid 05101030_0001 x

35 38 haploid 05040273_0001 x

36 39 haploid 05110003_0001 x

37 40 haploid 05120002_0001 x

38 41 haploid 05080095_0001 x

39 43 haploid 06110122_0002 x

40 44 haploid 05110716_0001 x

41 45 haploid 05010836_0001 x

42 46 haploid 05120155_0001 x

43 47 haploid 05110875_0001 x

44 48 haploid 05070553_0001 x

45 49 haploid 05070466_0001 x

46 50 haploid 06010650_0001 x

47 51 haploid 05110718_0001 x

48 52 haploid 05110496_0001 x

49 53 haploid 06010107_0001 x

50 54 haploid 05120429_0002 x

51 55 haploid 06010953_0001 x

52 56 haploid 05030686_0001 x

53 57 haploid 05060107_0001 x

54 58 haploid 05030791_0001 x

55 59 haploid 05080585_0001 x

56 60 haploid 05020375_0001 x

57 61 haploid 05121048_0001 x

58 62 haploid 05055090_0001 x

59 63 haploid 05121004_0002 x

60 64 haploid 06030064_0001 x

61 65 haploid 05121061_0004 x

62 66 haploid 05060276_0001 x

63 67 haploid 05100988_0001 x

64 68 haploid 05060315_0001 x

65 69 haploid 06030324_0003 x

66 70 haploid 05080506_0001 x

67 71 haploid 06010813_0001 x

68 72 haploid 05110881_0001 x

69 73 haploid 05100717_0001 x

70 74 haploid 06020169_0009 x

71 75 haploid 05110134_0001 x

72 76 haploid 05030196_0001 x

73 77 haploid 05050220_0001 x

74 78 haploid 06011195_0001 x

75 79 haploid 05120725_0001 x

76 80 haploid 05100510_0001 x

77 81 haploid 05060624_0001 x

78 82 haploid 05060712_0001 x

79 83 haploid 05030150_0001 x

80 84 haploid 06030180_0001 x

81 85 haploid 06020915_0001 x

82 86 haploid 05101150_0003 x

83 87 haploid 05101152_0001 x

84 88 haploid 05020415_0001 x

85 89 haploid 05040029_0002 x

86 90 haploid 05040035_0003 x

87 91 haploid 06020573_0001 x

88 93 haploid 05121112_0008 x

89 94 haploid 05090078_0001 x

90 95 haploid 05060495_0001 x

91 96 haploid 05070484_0001 x

92 97 haploid 06020455_0001 x

93 98 haploid 05075185_0001 x

94 99 haploid 05090522_0004 x

95 100 haploid 06020625_0002 x

96 101 haploid 05100812_0002 x

97 102 haploid 05100862_0001 x

98 103 haploid 05030224_0002 x

99 104 haploid 05040439_0001 x

100 105 haploid 05040317_0003 x

101 106 haploid 05080030_0001 x

102 107 haploid 05070703_0003 x

103 108 haploid 05080485_0001 x

104 109 haploid 05110470_0002 x

105 110 haploid 05100423_0001 x

106 111 haploid 05110423_0001 x

107 112 haploid 05080362_0003 x

108 113 haploid 05110625_0001 x

109 114 haploid 05120719_0001 x

110 115 haploid 05121073_0002 x

111 116 haploid 06050726_0002 x

112 117 haploid 06060063_0001 x

113 119 haploid 06121220_0001 x

114 120 haploid 06080516_0001 x

115 121 haploid 06090505_0002 x

116 122 haploid 06090407_0004 x

117 123 haploid 06051133_0002 x

118 124 haploid 06060740_0031 x

119 125 haploid 06060740_0077 x

120 126 haploid 06060740_0090 x

121 127 haploid 06120178_0001 x

122 128 haploid 06090960_0003 x

123 129 haploid 06090657_0001 x

124 130 haploid 06120377_0001 x

125 131 haploid 06070208_0001 x

126 132 haploid 07010308_0001 x

127 133 haploid 06121125_0001 x

128 134 haploid 06121125_0002 A x

129 135 haploid 06121125_0002 B x

130 136 haploid 06019052_0005 x

131 137 haploid 06129197_0001 x

132 138 haploid 06079077_0001 x

133 139 haploid 07019130_0003 x

134 140 haploid 06075474_0001 x

135 141 haploid 06075474_0003 x

136 142 haploid 06075544_0001 x

137 143 haploid 06045801_0001 x

138 144 haploid 06065285_0001 x

139 145 haploid 06081027_0001 x

140 146 haploid 06090264_0001 x

141 147 haploid 06090264_0002 x

142 148 haploid 06070430_0001 x

143 149 haploid 06090861_0001 x

144 150 haploid 06051245_0001 x

145 151 haploid 06070716_0001 x

146 152 haploid 06051468_0001 x

147 153 haploid 06075617_0001 x

148 154 haploid 06040273_0001 x

149 155 haploid 06080584_0001 x

150 156 haploid 06070825_0001 x

151 158 haploid 06110390_0015 x

152 159 haploid 06031385_0001 x

153 160 haploid 06045657_0001 x

154 161 haploid 06110204_0008 x

155 162 haploid 06050161_0001 x

156 163 haploid 06071068_0010 x

157 164 haploid 06100785_0002 x

158 165 haploid 06010987_0028 x

159 166 haploid 07010166_0001 x

160 167 haploid 06100730_0001 x

161 168 haploid 06080681_0001 x

162 169 haploid 06080532_0005 x

163 170 haploid 06040024_0001 x

164 172 haploid 06080217_0010 x

165 173 haploid 06120975_0001 x

166 174 haploid 06070581_0002 x

167 175 haploid 06060477_0001 x

168 176 haploid 06120852_0001 x

169 177 haploid 06091392_0001 x

170 178 haploid 06060344_0001 x

171 179 haploid 06090211_0001 x

172 180 haploid 06100858_0001 x

173 181 haploid 06080272_0007 x

174 182 haploid 06050493_0004 x

175 183 haploid 06101033_0002 x

176 184 haploid 06081043_0001 x

177 185 haploid 07011057_0001 x

178 186 haploid 06070921_0001 x

179 187 haploid 06111210_0002 x

180 188 haploid 06121495_0001 x

181 189 haploid 06110610_0001 x

182 190 haploid 06090772_0001 x

183 191 haploid 06090318_0002 x

184 192 haploid 06121313_0001 x

185 193 haploid 06085027_0001 x

186 194 haploid 06090109_0001 x

187 195 haploid 06080157_0001 x

188 196 haploid 06121316_0001 x

189 197 haploid 06110900_0001 x

190 198 haploid 06070228_0002 x

191 199 haploid 06101174_0001 x

192 200 haploid 06060805_0001 x

193 201 haploid 06085063_0001 x

194 202 haploid 06101037_0001 x

195 203 haploid 06110444_0002 x

196 204 haploid 06101487_0001 x

197 205 haploid 06100937_0001 x

198 206 haploid 06090820_0002 x

199 207 haploid 06070039_0001 x

200 208 haploid 06070772_0001 x

201 209 haploid 07011408_0001 x

202 210 haploid 07011408_0002 x

203 211 haploid 06100319_0001 x

204 212 haploid 06070468_0001 x

205 213 haploid 06121385_0002 x

206 214 haploid 06100537_0001 x

207 215 haploid 06120726_0001 x

208 216 haploid 06070883_0001 x

209 217 haploid 06040041_0001 x

210 218 haploid 06100263_0001 x

211 219 haploid 06040043_0009 x

212 220 haploid 06101232_0001 x

213 221 haploid 06060189_0003 x

214 222 haploid 06091275_0002 x

215 223 haploid 06060097_0001 x

216 224 haploid 06100873_0001 x

217 225 haploid 06050038_0001 x

218 226 haploid 06100025_0001 x

219 227 haploid 06100940_0002 x

220 228 haploid 06040800_0001 x

221 229 haploid 06071007_0002 x

222 230 haploid 06020043_0026 x

223 231 haploid 06060811_0153 x

224 232 haploid 06080751_0001 x

225 233 haploid 06050178_0068 x

226 234 haploid 06040287_0001 x

227 236 haploid 06101496_0001 x

228 237 haploid 06040643_0001 x

229 238 haploid 06045788_0003 x

230 239 haploid 06050326_0001 x

231 240 haploid 06080649_0002 x

232 241 haploid 06080649_0003 x

233 242 haploid 06080601_0001 x

234 243 haploid 06101247_0001 x

235 244 haploid 06111271_0001 x

236 245 haploid 06090337_0001 x

237 246 haploid 06050125_0002 x

238 247 haploid 06050331_0001 x

239 248 haploid 06060728_0002 x

240 249 haploid 06080109_0001 x

241 250 haploid 06101048_0001 x

242 251 haploid 06051077_0001 x

243 253 haploid 06041067_0003 x

244 254 haploid 06040302_0002 x

245 255 haploid 06110121_0001 x

246 256 haploid 06090845_0001 x

247 257 haploid 06060375_0001 x

248 258 haploid 06070494_0001 x

249 259 haploid 06040938_0003 x

250 260 haploid 06081010_0001 x

251 261 haploid 06070415_0003 x

252 263 haploid 07010776_0001 x

253 264 haploid 06120890_0001 x

254 265 haploid 06120316_0001 x

255 266 haploid 06121413_0001 x

256 267 haploid 06090247_0001 x

257 268 haploid 06090247_0002 x

258 269 haploid 06090801_0001 x

259 270 haploid 06041160_0002 x

260 271 haploid 06031248_0001 x

261 272 haploid 07010075_0001 x

262 273 haploid 07011039_0001 x

263 274 haploid 06041232_0001 x

264 275 haploid 06101271_0002 x

265 276 haploid 06060506_0001 x

266 277 haploid 06080566_0001 x

267 278 haploid 06060124_0001 x

268 279 haploid 07020168_0001 x

269 281 haploid 06090909_0002 x

270 282 haploid 06080869_0001 x

271 1 commercial pisifera BL605/39-04 2x

272 2 commercial pisifera BL607/91-10 2x

273 3 commercial pisifera BL612/84-05 2x

274 4 commercial pisifera BL1120/75-07 2x

275 5 commercial pisifera BL143/04-10 2x

276 6 commercial pisifera BL147/21-05 2x

277 7 commercial pisifera BL148/05-08 2x

278 8 commercial pisifera BL158/A2-13 2x

279 1 commercial tenera BL10452/207-02 2x

280 2 commercial tenera BL10323/104-06 2x

281 3 commercial tenera BL1177/184-09 2x

282 1 commercial dura BL10887/08-22 2x

283 2 commercial dura BL10885/08-27 2x

284 3 commercial dura BL1221/51-14 2x

285 4 commercial dura BL1222/32-02 2x

286 5 commercial dura BL1224/14-19 2x

287 6 commercial dura BL1231/02-01 2x

288 7 commercial dura BL1235/14-01 2x

289 8 commercial dura BL1125/03-02 2x

290 9 commercial dura BL1124/17-09 2x

291 10 commercial dura BL1136/01-02 2x

292 11 commercial dura BL10868/12-10 2x

293 12 commercial dura BL10868/12-11 2x

294 13 commercial dura BL10868/12-13 2x

295 14 commercial dura BL10879/08-06 2x

296 15 commercial dura BL10879/08-07 2x

297 16 commercial dura BL10879/08-09 2x

298 17 commercial dura BL10883/04-06 2x

299 18 commercial dura BL10883/04-08 2x

300 19 commercial dura BL10883/04-09 2x

301 20 commercial dura BL10883/05-06 2x

302 21 commercial dura BL10891/04-23 2x

303 22 commercial dura BL10891/04-24 2x

304 23 commercial dura BL10891/05-22 2x

305 24 commercial dura BL10891/05-23 2x

306 25 commercial dura BL10873/52-18 2x

307 26 commercial dura BL10873/52-19 2x

308 27 commercial dura BL10873/52-21 2x

309 28 commercial dura BL10873/53-19 2x

310 29 commercial dura BL1229/48-15 2x

311 30 commercial dura BL1230/42-15 2x

312 31 commercial dura A1122/04-01 2x

313 32 commercial dura A1122/12-05 2x

314 33 commercial dura A1122/12-08 2x

315 34 commercial dura A1122/36-02 2x

316 35 commercial dura A1123/01-02 2x

317 36 commercial dura A1123/01-06 2x

318 37 commercial dura A1123/01-07 2x

319 38 commercial dura A1123/01-12 2x

320 39 commercial dura A1130/02-02 2x

321 40 commercial dura A1130/02-06 2x

322 41 commercial dura A1130/02-10 2x

323 42 commercial dura A1130/02-16 2x

324 43 commercial dura A1127/08-16 2x

325 44 commercial dura A1127/08-06 2x

326 45 commercial dura A1127/05-11 2x

327 46 commercial dura A1127/05-03 2x

328 47 commercial dura B1134/35-09 2x

329 48 commercial dura B1133/07-10 2x

330 49 commercial dura B1136/21-11 2x

331 50 commercial dura B1136/21-12 2x

332 51 commercial dura C1128/07-14 2x

333 52 commercial dura C1121/13-08 2x

334 53 commercial dura BL11508/111-1 2x

335 54 commercial dura BL11396/11-21 2x

336 1 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/1-1 2x

337 2 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/41-498 2x

338 3 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/39-875 2x

339 4 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/31-430 2x

340 5 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/26-629 2x

341 6 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/24-1164 2x

342 7 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/56-1185 2x

343 8 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/29-1087 2x

344 9 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/38-1193 2x

345 10 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/43-994 2x

346 11 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/8-1100 2x

347 12 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/11-1192 2x

348 13 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/35-1190 2x

349 14 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/3-46 2x

350 15 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/5-102 2x

351 16 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/7-121 2x

352 17 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/12-239 2x

353 18 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/14-350 2x

354 19 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/18-368 2x

355 20 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/19-245 2x

356 21 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/21-1180 2x

357 22 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/32-1141 2x

358 23 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/37-1124 2x

359 24 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/45-448 2x

360 25 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/47-1175 2x

361 26 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/50-1037 2x

362 27 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/52-547 2x

363 28 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/53-1167 2x

364 29 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/54-1196 2x

365 30 Ghana wild K31-1/GHANA/57-1153 2x

Table 7.

Primer pairs used in the Principal Coordinates Analysis to compare the genetic diversity and affinities of Hs compared with a representative sample of commercial and wild diploid palms (listed in Table 6).

No Primer Forward (5'-3') Reverse (5'-3')
1 1996 CACTGGGGTCATCTTCATCT TCGTTCTCTTTCCTTTTGTC

2 2215 GAACTTGGCGTGTAACT TGGTAGGTCTATTTGAGAGT

3 2427 GAAGGGGCATTGGATTT CAGGTGACCAAGTGTAAT

4 2569 TAGCCGCACTCCCACGAAGC CCAGAATCATCAGACTCGGACAG

5 2595 TCAAAGAGCCGCACAACAAG ACTTTGCTGCTTGGTGACTTA

6 2600 GGGGATGAGTTTGTTTGTTC GGCAACATGAAGGTAAG

7 3282 GTAACAGCATCCACACTAAC GCAGGACAGGAGTAATGAGT

8 3298 GACTACCGTATTGCGTTCAG TTTATCAGGAGTTTTTGTTTGAGAG

9 3311 AATCCAAGTGGCCTACAG TCCCTACAATAGCCATCTC

10 3321 CAAGGAGGAGCAGGTGAG TACGGCCTCGGTTCTACAC

11 3399 AGCCAATGAAGGATAAAGG CCACTTAGAGGTAAAACAACAG

12 3400 CAATTCCAGCGTFAFTATAG AGTGGCAGTGGAAAAACAGT

13 3433 GGTTCAATGGCATACAT ACTCCCCTCTTTGACAT

14 3538 TCAAGCCACATCCTAACTAC CTCATAGCCTTTGTTGTGT

15 3544 AGCAGGGCAAGAGCAATACT TTCAGCAGCAGGAAACATC

16 3546 GCCTATCCCCTGAACTATCT TGCACATACCAGCAACAGAG

17 3574 AGAGACCCTATTTGCTTGAT GACAAAGAGCTTGTCACAC

18 3711 GTCTCATGTGGCTACCTCTC GCTAGGTGAAAAATAAAGTT

19 3819 CCTCCTTTGGAATTATG GTGTTTGATGGGACATACA

20 219 TTTGCTCGGCGGATACAT GGAGGGCAGGAACAAAAAGT

21 257 GCAGCTAGTCACCTGAAC GACGAGACTGGAAAGATG

22 782 CGTTCATCCCACCACCTTTC GCTGCGAGGCCACTGATAC

23 783 GAATGTGGCTGTAAATGCTGAGTG AAGCCGCATGGACAACTCTAGTAA

24 882 TTGATCTTAGACATAACATACTGTA AAAGCGCGTAATCTCATAGT

25 894 TGCTTCTTGTCCTTGATACA CCACGTCTACGAAATGATAA

26 3213 GCTCTTTGTATTTCCTGGTTC AGCAGCAAACCCTACTAACT

27 3691 GCATCATTGGACTATCATACC TTGTGAACCAGGGAACTATC

28 vs1 GAGATTACAAAGTCCAAACC TCAAAATTAAGAAAGTATGC

All primers except VS1 were taken from Billotte et al. [27].

Colchicine treatment

Roots of confirmed haploid seedlings were washed and immersed in 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10 mM aqueous colchicine for 5 h. Seedlings were then rinsed with water and planted (2:1:1 v/v compost, sand and soil).

Cross-fertilization using pollen from H plants

A developing male inflorescence of a confirmed H at the PMC stage was treated with 2.5 mM colchicine via injection into the spathe. This treatment was repeated at weekly intervals. The resultant pollen (0.03 g) was applied to a targeted section of the female inflorescence of a diploid dura palm. The inflorescence was then bagged to prevent inadvertent wind pollination.

In addition, some untreated H plants contained up to 30% fully stained pollen using Fluorescein diacetate (FDA) that was presumed to be viable. Pollen from these plants and from palms with apparently inviable pollen (unstained) was applied to targeted sections of a female inflorescence of diploid dura palms in the same way as above.

Competing interests

JMD, MJW, AEC and CSF have received research funding from BioHybrids International Ltd; SN, SW, ACS, DM and YA are employed fully or in part by Sumatra Bioscience; BPF is contracted to BioHybrids International Ltd; PDSC is Managing Director of BioHybrids International Ltd.

Authors' contributions

JMD, PDSC, SN and MJW conceived the project. SN, BPF and ACS supervised the phenotypic screen and flow cytometry. MJW supervised the molecular analysis conducted by SW, AEC, CSF and YA, and the cytology conducted by DM. JMD and MJW wrote the manuscript and all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Jim M Dunwell, Email: j.m.dunwell@reading.ac.uk.

Mike J Wilkinson, Email: jjw@aber.ac.uk.

Stephen Nelson, Email: stephen.nelson@sumatrabioscience.com.

Sri Wening, Email: sri.wening@sumatrabioscience.com.

Andrew C Sitorus, Email: andrew.sitorus@sumatrabioscience.com.

Devi Mienanti, Email: devimienanti@yahoo.com.

Yuzer Alfiko, Email: yuzer.alfiko@sumatrabioscience.com.

Adam E Croxford, Email: aoc@aber.ac.uk.

Caroline S Ford, Email: csf@aber.ac.uk.

Brian P Forster, Email: brianforster@biohybrids.co.uk.

Peter DS Caligari, Email: pcaligari@utalca.cl.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Sumatra Bioscience as part of their R&D programme in oil palm. The authors are grateful for the assistance of all staff of the Breeding Department and Seed Production Unit at Bah Lias Research Station, Indonesia.

References

  1. Duvick DN. Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nature Rev Genet. 2001;2:69–73. doi: 10.1038/35047587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, Katsura K, Maeda S, Yoshida H. Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Prod Sci. 2005;8:259–274. doi: 10.1626/pps.8.259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forster BP, Thomas WTB. Doubled haploids in genetics and plant breeding. Plant Breeding Rev. 2005;25:57–88. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook RR. A haploid Marglobe tomato. J Hered. 1936;27:433–435. [Google Scholar]
  5. Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Szarejko I. In: Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants: A Manual. Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003. Published protocols for other crop plant species; pp. 309–335. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunwell JM. Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation. Plant Biotech J. 2010;8:377–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelly-Yong TL, Lee KT, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S. Potential of hydrogen from oil palm biomass as a source of renewable energy worldwide. Energ Policy. 2007;35:5692–5701. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Basiron Y. Palm oil production through sustainable plantations. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2007;109:289–295. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.200600223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Agricultural Production Statistics. http://faostat.fao.org/
  10. Stone R. Ecology - Can palm oil plantations come clean? Science. 2007;317:1491. doi: 10.1126/science.317.5844.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilcove DS, Koh LP. Addressing the threats to biodiversity from oil-palm agriculture. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19:999–1007. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9760-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koh LP, Wilcove DS. Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature. 2007;448:993–994. doi: 10.1038/448993a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clements R, Posa MRC. Conservationists could slip up in oil-palm enterprise. Nature. 2007;449:403. doi: 10.1038/449403d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Venter O, Meijaard E, Wilson K. Strategies and alliances needed to protect forest from palm-oil industry. Nature. 2008;451:16. doi: 10.1038/451016a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Corley RHV. Potential productivity of tropical perennial crops. Exp Agric. 1983;19:217–237. doi: 10.1017/S0014479700022742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Murphy DJ. Oil palm: future prospects for yield and quality improvements. Lipid Technology. 2009;21:257–260. doi: 10.1002/lite.200900067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones LH. Prospects for biotechnology in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and coconut (Cocos nucifera) improvement. Biotech Genet Engin Rev. 1989;7:281–296. [Google Scholar]
  18. Whitehead RA, Chapman GP. Twinning and haploidy in Cocos nucifera. Nature. 1962;195:1228–1229. doi: 10.1038/1951228a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bouvier L, Zhang YX, Lespinasse Y. Two methods of haploidization in pear, Pyrus communis L.: greenhouse seedling selection and in situ parthenogenesis induced by irradiated pollen. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;87:229–232. doi: 10.1007/BF00223769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Germana MA. In: Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants. Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain SM, editor. The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag; 2009. Haploids and doubled haploids in fruit trees; pp. 241–263. full_text. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lim W, Earle ED. Enhanced recovery of doubled haploid lines from parthenogenetic plants of melon. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2009;98:351–356. doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9563-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Finkel E. With 'phenomics,' plant scientists hope to shift plant breeding into overdrive. Science. 2009;325:380–381. doi: 10.1126/science.325_380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reijnders L, Huijbregts MAJ. Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases. J Clean Product. 2008;16:477–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parveez GKA. Biolistic mediated production of transgenic oil palm. Method Mol Biol. 2009;477:301–320. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-517-0_23. full_text. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Persson UM, Azar C. Preserving the world's tropical forests - a price on carbon may not do. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:210–215. doi: 10.1021/es902629x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Croxford AE, Rogers T, Caligari PDS, Wilkinson MJ. High-resolution melt analysis to identify and map sequence-tagged site anchor points onto linkage maps: a white lupin (Lupinus albus) map as an exemplar. New Phytol. 2008;180:594–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Billotte N, Marseillac N, Risterucci AM, Adon B, Brottier P, Baurens FC, Singh R, Herran A, Asmady H, Billot C, Amblard P, Durand-Gasselin T, Courtois B, Asmono D, Cheah SC, Rohde W, Ritter E, Charrier A. Microsatellite-based high density linkage map in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110:754–765. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1901-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Billotte N, Risterucci AM, Barcelos E, Noyer JL, Amblard P, Baurens FC. Development, characterisation, and across-taxa utility of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) microsatellite markers. Genome. 2001;44:413–425. doi: 10.1139/gen-44-3-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1991;9:221–231. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Orloci L. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2. Boston: The Hague; 1978. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Plant Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES