Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2010 Nov 10;49(1):439–441. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02208-10

Emergence of Erythromycin- and Clindamycin-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes emm 90 Strains in Hawaii

Iris Chen 1, Pakieli Kaufisi 1, Guliz Erdem 2,*
PMCID: PMC3020461  PMID: 21068284

Abstract

We identified 12 erythromycin- and clindamycin-resistant emm 90 group A streptococcus (GAS) isolates during a retrospective invasive disease survey in Hawaii. A comparison with 20 type-matched isolates showed all resistant isolates to be emm 90.4b with the constitutive or inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotype (cMLSB or iMLSB). All isolates had the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern, suggesting clonal spread.


The erythromycin resistance rate (∼3%) has been low among group A streptococcus (GAS) isolates in Hawaii, where impetigo, acute rheumatic fever, and clusters of necrotizing fasciitis have been reported (5-7, 8-10; G. Erdem, G. Matsuura, G. Wheelen, C. Mizumoto, D. Esaki, and P. V. Effler, presented at the XVIIth Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases, Porto Heli, Greece, 2008). During a retrospective survey of 250 GAS cultures collected from patients with invasive GAS disease identified between the years 2005 and 2007, the reviews of the clinical information incidentally showed erythromycin and clindamycin resistance in five patients. emm typing of these isolates showed a single emm type: emm 90.4b. In addition to these five isolates, 15 additional isolates from individual patients with invasive disease were emm type 90.4b. The high percentage of invasive isolates (8%) belonging to this infrequent emm type and associated drug resistance prompted us to characterize the associated drug resistance patterns. We wanted to compare the resistance patterns among the isolates identified during this survey and other emm type 90 isolates identified from patients with noninvasive disease during our previous surveys. Of the 20 invasive GAS isolates, 12 were from blood cultures. Eight isolates were identified from wound cultures of inpatients with severe skin and soft tissue infections. Twelve additional emm type 90 pharyngeal isolates from our archived collection of 1,660 GAS isolates (collected from 1997 to 2007) were studied.

(Preliminary data were presented in part at the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 58th Annual Meeting in November 2009.)

emm sequencing (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/strepblast.htm) was done for all isolates. Etest methodology (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, NJ) was used to determine MICs for erythromycin and clindamycin (2, 3). The erythromycin-clindamycin double disk test was applied to resistant isolates. The “blunting” in the inhibition zone around the clindamycin disk next to the erythromycin disk was interpreted to be an inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotype (iMLSB), and susceptibility to clindamycin with no blunting indicated the M phenotype. The mef(A), erm(B), erm(A) (20), and erm(TR) resistance genes and prtF1 were detected by PCR amplification (11, 19, 23, 24, 26, 27). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with a Chef-DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad) after SmaI digestion.

All (20 isolates) invasive GAS emm 90 strains were of the allelic variation type 90.4b. Of the 12 noninvasive pharyngitis isolates, three emm 90 subtypes were identified: emm type 90.0 (one isolate from the year 1997), emm type 90.2 (6 isolates from 2004, 2005, and 2006), and emm type 90.4b (5 isolates: one isolate from 2005 and 4 isolates from 2007). Five of the invasive isolates had the constitutive MLSB (cMLSB) phenotype, with MICs showing resistance to both clindamycin (MIC, 3 to 4 μg/ml) and erythromycin (MIC, 12 to 64 μg/ml). Seven of them showed the iMLSB phenotype (Table 1). All of the resistant strains were isolated after July 2006. Of the 12 noninvasive isolates, only three of the emm 90.4 isolates showed resistance (erythromycin MIC, 12 to 24 μg/ml) with the iMLSB phenotype, and they were identified in the year 2007. Other emm 90 subtypes did not show resistance.

TABLE 1.

Isolation years, sources, emm typing, drug MICs, phenotypes, and resistance genes identified in invasive GAS isolates listed according to original culture and identification dates

Isolate emm type Yr MIC (μg/ml) of druga
Drug resistance phenotype Resistance genes Source
EM CM
1 90.4b 2005 0.19 0.125 Blood
2 90.4b 2006 24 0.125 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
3 90.4b 2006 0.25 0.19 Blood
4 90.4b 2006 32 0.19 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
5 90.4b 2006 0.38 0.25 Blood
6 90.4b 2006 0.25 0.125 Wound
7 90.4b 2006 48 0.094 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Wound
8 90.4b 2006 24 0.19 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Wound
9 90.4b 2006 24 0.125 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Wound
10 90.4b 2006 24 4 cMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Wound
11 90.4b 2006 12 0.125 iMLSB erm(a), erm(TR) Wound
12 90.4b 2006 0.125 0.125 Blood
13 90.4b 2006 24 0.047 iMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Foot
14 90.4b 2006 0.19 0.047 Blood
15 90.4b 2006 0.125 0.125 Blood
16 90.4b 2006 0.25 0.25 Wound
17 90.4b 2006 48 3 cMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
18 90.4b 2007 24 3 cMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
19 90.4b 2007 48 3 cMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
20 90.4b 2007 64 3 cMLSB erm(A), erm(TR) Blood
a

EM, erythromycin; CM, clindamycin.

The erythromycin resistance rates increased each subsequent year (0% in 2005, 56% in 2006, and 86% in 2007). All of these MLSB isolates had the erm(A) and erm(TR) genes and tested negative for the presence of mef(A) and erm(B) genes. All noninvasive isolates tested positive for the presence of the prtF1 gene. Four PFGE patterns were identified among emm 90.4 isolates, and all drug-resistant isolates (cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes) had one identical PFGE pattern. Among the emm type 90.4b isolates, there was an approximately 250-kb-size band difference between the drug-resistant and nonresistant isolates.

Erythromycin or clindamycin is recommended as an alternative treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in case of allergy to beta-lactams, and clindamycin could be used in combination with penicillin for treatment of severe streptococcal infections (12, 31). Resistance of Sreptococcus pyogenes to macrolides and lincosamides has been reported, and overenthusiastic use of several macrolides may further increase this problem (14, 15, 19, 27, 28). A few emm types, such as emm 4, 6, 12, 58, 75, 77, 89 and 114, have been associated with resistance (1, 4, 14, 17, 19, 24, 26, 28). The emm type 90 isolates have not been associated with invasive GAS disease or with macrolide resistance (1, 4, 22, 25, 27, 30). This emm type appeared to be common after 2006 among invasive GAS strains, although it has been infrequently identified during our previous studies (5-7, 8-10; Erdem et al., XVIIth Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases). Considering that we have previously showed a wide variety of rather infrequent continental U.S. emm types and low levels of resistance, the emergence of these clonal, drug-resistant and invasive strains in Hawaii is concerning (29).

Macrolide resistance has been linked to invasiveness with possible introduction of drug resistance and virulence genes via lateral gene transfer (11). This may explain the presence of drug-resistant and invasive strains in our study. Facinelli et al. described the drug-resistant intracellular streptococci escaping the effects of macrolides (11). They found a high proportion of drug-resistant isolates to be PrtF1 positive, suggesting PrtF1 as a virulence factor (11). In contrast, almost none of the invasive and drug-resistant strains in our study had this gene. This finding may be more in-line with PrtF1 association with persistent infection or carriage (11, 21).

We do not know whether our strains have a higher invasion efficiency, since we have not done similar internalization and cell invasion assays. However, we have shown isolates harboring the rarely reported, constitutively expressed erm(TR) gene sharing the same PFGE pattern with the inducible resistant phenotypes after 2006 (17, 18, 20). Expression of the erm genes can be constitutive and inducible, and the selective pressure of clindamycin may lead to selection of constitutively resistant derivatives with alterations in the attenuator of the erm(TR) gene (12, 15). Point mutations in the erm regulatory region leading to constitutive methylase expression and high-level resistance due to the destabilization of the stem-loop structure have also been reported (17). In pneumococci, constitutive expression of resistance was found to be due to deletions, duplications, or point mutations in the attenuator sequence, leading to the derepressed production of the methylase (15, 16).

The single PFGE band difference between most of the drug-resistant and -sensitive isolates was an interesting finding of our study. Macrolide resistance is more likely to occur from a horizontal gene transfer than a spontaneous chromosomal mutation when observed in a rapid spread of a single emm type (28). In one study, the acquisition of the resistance phenotype was associated with the appearance of a new ∼30- to 40-kb band in the PFGE pattern of a recipient macrolide-susceptible strain, suggesting a transposable element (13). Further studies need to be done on the 250-kb genomic fragment of our drug-resistant isolates to understand whether emm 90.4b developed drug resistance from a genomic insertion. Clonal spread of erythromycin-resistant strains belonging to a single emm type has been reported (14, 19, 24, 26). Our study shows similar concerns of clonal emergence in Hawaii with this multidrug-resistant emm type.

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to Christian Wheelen and Paul Effler for their help in collection of the isolates.

This study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, Centers of Biomedical Research Association (P20RR018727-02), and Research Centers in Minority Institutions (P20RR11091-06).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 10 November 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barrozo, C. P., K. L. Russell, T. C. Smith, A. W. Hawksworth, M. A. Ryan, and G. C. Gray. 2003. National Department of Defense surveillance data for antibiotic resistance and emm gene types of clinical group A streptococcal isolates from eight basic training military sites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4808-4811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CLSI. 2008. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically for streptococcus spp. beta-hemolytic group: approved standard, 7th ed. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  • 3.CLSI. 2008. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests for streptococcus spp. beta-hemolytic group: approved standard, 9th ed. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  • 4.Dicuonzo, G., E. Fiscarelli, G. Gherardi, G. Lorino, F. Battistoni, S. Landi, M. De Cesaris, T. Petitti, and B. Beall. 2002. Erythromycin-resistant pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes recovered in Italy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3987-3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Erdem, G., L. Abe, R. Y. Kanenaka, L. Pang, K. Mills, C. Mizumoto, K. Yamaga, and P. V. Effler. 2004. Characterization of a community cluster of group A streptococcal invasive disease in Maui, Hawaii. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 23:677-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Erdem, G., J. Ford, D. Johnson, L. Abe, K. Yamaga, and E. Kaplan. 2005. Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococcal isolates collected between 2000 and 2005 in Oahu, Hawaii, and their emm types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2497-2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Erdem, G., J. M. Ford, R. Y. Kanenaka, L. Abe, K. Yamaga, and P. V. Effler. 2005. Molecular epidemiologic comparison of 2 unusual clusters of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis in Hawaii. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:1851-1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Erdem, G., C. Mizumoto, D. Esaki, L. Abe, V. Reddy, and P. V. Effler. 2009. Streptococcal emm types in Hawaii: a region with high incidence of acute rheumatic fever. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 28:13-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erdem, G., C. Mizumoto, D. Esaki, V. Reddy, D. Kurahara, K. Yamaga, L. Abe, D. Johnson, K. Yamamoto, and E. L. Kaplan. 2007. Group A streptococcal isolates temporally associated with acute rheumatic fever in Hawaii: differences from the continental United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:e20-e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erdem, G., S. Sinclair, J. R. Marrone, T. F. I'Atala, A. Tuua, B. Tuua, F. Tuumua, A. Dodd, C. Mizumoto, and L. Medina. 2009. Higher rates of streptococcal colonization among children in the Pacific Rim Region correlates with higher rates of group A streptococcal disease and sequelae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:452-455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Facinelli, B., C. Spinaci, G. Magi, E. Giovanetti, and E. P. Varaldo. 2001. Association between erythromycin resistance and ability to enter human respiratory cells in group A streptococci. Lancet 358:30-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fines, M., M. Gueudin, A. Ramon, and R. Leclercq. 2001. In vitro selection of resistance to clindamycin related to alterations in the attenuator of the erm(TR) gene of Streptococcus pyogenes UCN1 inducibly resistant to erythromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:411-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giovanetti, E., G. Magi, A. Brenciani, C. Spinaci, R. Lupidi, B. Facinelli, and P. E. Varaldo. 2002. Conjugative transfer of the erm(A) gene from erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes to macrolide-susceptible S. pyogenes, Enterococcus faecalis and Listeria innocua. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:249-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Green, M., J. M. Martin, K. A. Barbadora, B. Beall, and E. R. Wald. 2004. Reemergence of macrolide resistance in pharyngeal isolates of group a streptococci in southwestern Pennsylvania. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:473-476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leclercq, R. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:482-492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leclercq, R., and P. Courvalin. 2002. Resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2727-2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malhotra-Kumar, S., A. Mazzariol, L. Van Heirstraeten, C. Lammens, P. de Rijk, G. Cornaglia, and H. Goossens. 2009. Unusual resistance patterns in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes harbouring erm(A). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:42-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Malhotra-Kumar, S., L. Van Heirstraeten, C. Lammens, S. Chapelle, and H. Goossens. 2009. Emergence of high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in emm6 Streptococcus pyogenes and in vitro resistance selection with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:886-894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martin, J. M., M. Green, K. A. Barbadora, and E. R. Wald. 2002. Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in schoolchildren in Pittsburgh. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:1200-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Morosini, M. I., R. Canton, E. Loza, R. del Campo, F. Almaraz, and F. Baquero. 2003. Streptococcus pyogenes isolates with characterized macrolide resistance mechanisms in Spain: in vitro activities of telithromycin and cethromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:50-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neeman, R., N. Keller, A. Barzilai, Z. Korenman, and S. Sela. 1998. Prevalence of internalisation-associated gene, prtF1, among persisting group-A streptococcus strains isolated from asymptomatic carriers. Lancet 352:1974-1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O'Brien, K. L., B. Beall, N. L. Barrett, P. R. Cieslak, A. Reingold, M. M. Farley, R. Danila, E. R. Zell, R. Facklam, B. Schwartz, and A. Schuchat. 2002. Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcus disease in the United States, 1995-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:268-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oster, P., A. Zanchi, S. Cresti, M. Lattanzi, F. Montagnani, C. Cellesi, and G. M. Rossolini. 1999. Patterns of macrolide resistance determinants among community-acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates over a 5-year period of decreased macrolide susceptibility rates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2510-2512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Perez-Trallero, E., J. M. Marimon, M. Montes, B. Orden, and M. de Pablos. 1999. Clonal differences among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:235-240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pournaras, S., A. Efstratiou, J. Douboyas, R. C. George, and A. Tsakris. 2000. Genetic relatedness of group A streptococci of the newly designated serotype M90 causing a food-borne outbreak and sporadic infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 125:299-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reinert, R. R., R. Lutticken, J. A. Sutcliffe, A. Tait-Kamradt, M. Y. Cil, H. M. Schorn, A. Bryskier, and A. Al-Lahham. 2004. Clonal relatedness of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolates in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1369-1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richter, S. S., K. P. Heilmann, S. E. Beekmann, N. J. Miller, A. L. Miller, C. L. Rice, C. D. Doern, S. D. Reid, and G. V. Doern. 2005. Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in the United States, 2002-2003. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:599-608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robinson, D. A., J. A. Sutcliffe, W. Tewodros, A. Manoharan, and D. E. Bessen. 2006. Evolution and global dissemination of macrolide-resistant group A streptococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2903-2911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steer, A. C., I. Law, L. Matatolu, B. W. Beall, and J. R. Carapetis. 2009. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:611-616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tanz, R. R., S. T. Shulman, V. D. Shortridge, W. Kabat, K. Kabat, E. Cederlund, J. Rippe, J. Beyer, S. Doktor, and B. W. Beall. 2004. Community-based surveillance in the United States of macrolide-resistant pediatric pharyngeal group A streptococci during 3 respiratory disease seasons. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:1794-1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zimbelman, J., A. Palmer, and J. Todd. 1999. Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 18:1096-1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES