Abstract
Despite advances in identifying deafness genes, determination of the underlying cellular and functional mechanisms for auditory diseases remains a challenge. Mutations of the human K+ channel hKv7.4 lead to post-lingual progressive hearing loss (DFNA2), which affects world-wide population with diverse racial backgrounds. Here, we have generated the spectrum of point mutations in the hKv7.4 that have been identified as diseased mutants. We report that expression of five point mutations in the pore region, namely L274H, W276S, L281S, G285C, and G296S, as well as the C-terminal mutant G321S in the heterologous expression system, yielded non-functional channels because of endoplasmic reticulum retention of the mutant channels. We mimicked the dominant diseased conditions by co-expressing the wild-type and mutant channels. As compared with expression of wild-type channel alone, the blend of wild-type and mutant channel subunits resulted in reduced currents. Moreover, the combinatorial ratios of wild type:mutant and the ensuing current magnitude could not be explained by the predictions of a tetrameric channel and a dominant negative effect of the mutant subunits. The results can be explained by the dependence of cell surface expression of the mutant on the wild-type subunit. Surprisingly, a transmembrane mutation F182L, which has been identified in a pre-lingual progressive hearing loss patient in Taiwan, yielded cell surface expression and functional features that were similar to that of the wild type, suggesting that this mutation may represent redundant polymorphism. Collectively, these findings provide traces of the cellular mechanisms for DFNA2.
Keywords: Genetic Diseases, Membrane Biophysics, Membrane Trafficking, Mutant, Potassium Channels, Auditory System, Hearing Loss, Missense Mutations
Introduction
The importance of K+ channels in controlling the membrane properties of excitable and non-excitable cells is underpinned by the plethora of genetic diseases that ensue from mutations of genes encoding these channels (1–5). For example, in the inner ear, Kv7 (KCNQ) channels are expressed abundantly in inner/outer hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, and the current serves as one of the essential determinants of the resting membrane potential (Vrest) (6–8). Additionally, activation of Kv7 channel currents may promote K+ recycling between the perilymph and the K+-rich endolymph, establishing dynamic flux of ions across the membranes of sensory and non-sensory cells of the cochlear duct (9, 10). Moreover, at the lateral wall of the cochlear duct, the cytoarchitecture of non-sensory cells and the rapid flux of ions favor the generation of an extracellular field potential of ∼80 mV that defines the cochlear duct as the hub of “the battery” of auditory transduction (11, 12). Accordingly, mutations or null deletions of Kv7.4 in humans and animal models result in gradual degeneration of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, described as an autosomal dominant form of non-syndromic progressive hearing loss (DFNA2) (13–15). Although the coarse features of Kv7.4 channel functions in the auditory system have been identified, the cellular and functional mechanisms of the mutant channels in DFNA2 remain unknown despite its global implication.
DFNA2 affects families of diverse backgrounds ranging from Europeans and American families to families of Asian origins. In humans, Kv7.4 is located on chromosome 1p34 (16, 17). To date, as many as eight missense mutations have been reported resulting in seven specific point mutations, and in two extreme cases, there are frameshift mutations that end up with small truncated peptides (see Table 1). Moreover, a substantial number of the missense mutations, six out of eight, have been identified in the pore (P)-loop of Kv7.4 channels, including the GYG K+ filter region. The remaining two missense mutations are located at S3 and the C-terminal domains. Only two mutant forms, G285S and G296S, have been evaluated at the cellular level to determine the functional implications in heterologous expression system (2, 18).
TABLE 1.
Family | Amino acid change | DNA change | Protein domain | Exon | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
French | G285S | G853A | Pore region | 6 | (2) |
American I | G285C | G853T | Pore region | 6 | (40) |
Belgian | Fs71X134 | 211del13 | N-terminal cytoplasmic | 1 | (40) |
Dutch I | W276S | G827C | Pore region | 5 | (40) |
Japanese I | (41) | ||||
Japanese II | (3) | ||||
Dutch IV | (3) | ||||
Dutch V | (26) | ||||
Dutch II | G321S | G961A | C-terminal cytoplasmic | 7 | (40) |
American II | L281S | T842C | Pore region | 6 | (25) |
Dutch III | L274H | T821A | Pore region | 5 | (42) |
Japanese III | Fs71X138 | 211del1 | N-terminal cytoplasmic | 1 | (43) |
Taiwanese | F182L | C546G | S3 transmembrane | 4 | (23) |
Spanish | G296S | G886A | Pore region | 6 | (18) |
To address the underlying cellular and functional mechanisms of DFNA2, we generated seven mutant forms of the human Kv7.4 clone using site-directed mutagenesis. We then defined their subcellular localization and tested their electrophysiological properties. The pore mutations of the channels resulted in non-functional channels. Additionally, the pore mutant channels had defective channel trafficking and cell surface expression. Moreover, the C-terminal mutation G321S produced similar dual effects. In contrast, the S3 mutation had functional phenotypes that were similar to the wild-type channel, yielding an unexpected finding that may represent polymorphism, and requiring further investigation. Thus, this report provides cellular and molecular mechanisms of Kv7.4 function for DFNA2.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Ethical Approval
All procedures in this report were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of California, Davis, CA.
Generation of Mutant Forms of hKv7.4 and Epitope-tagged Construct
Wild-type (WT) hKv7.4 clones, isoform a, 695 amino acids (gene ID: NM_004700) and isoform b, 641 amino acids (gene ID: NM_172163), were purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). The CDS were subcloned into pIRES2-EGFP plasmid vector (Clontech). Seven missense mutations were generated from wild-type gene using the QuikChange II mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and verified by automated sequencing. pIRES2-EGFP-hKv7.4-WT and mutants were used in an electrophysiology/patch clamp study using EGFP expression as a transfection marker. For the study of subcellular localization of WT and mutant (MT)2 subunits, two different epitopes, modified HA- and c-Myc tags, were inserted into pCMV-hKv7.4-WT and mutant constructs in which EGFP genes were eliminated. Modified HA- and c-Myc epitopes were flanked with ClC-5 chloride channel D1–D2 loop to increase accessibility and inserted in the end of the S1–S2 loop of hKv7.4 as described previously in Kv7.2/7.3 (19) and Kv7.4 (18) channels. S1–S2 loop amino acid sequences were changed to STIQEHQELANENSEHYPYDVPDYAVTFEERDKCPEWNC for HA-tagged constructs and STIQEHQELANENSEHEQKLISEEDLVTFEERDKCPEWNC for c-Myc tagged constructs; whole inserted regions are underlined, and epitopes are shown in bold. Epitope tags were generated by recombination polymerase chain reaction and verified by automated sequencing.
Cell Culture and hKv7.4 Gene Delivery
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line was maintained in F-12 media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1× antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (Invitrogen) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were seeded onto 12-mm coverslips in F-12 + 10% FBS without antibiotics and cultured 12–24 h before transfection. hKv7.4-WT or hKv7.4 mutant DNA was transiently transfected into cells singly or in combinations, at a total amount of 200 ng/well, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Electrophysiological Recordings
Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were performed from single, uncoupled cells at room temperature (20–22 °C) using an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Inc. Union City, CA). Fire-polished electrodes (3–4 megaohms) were pulled from borosilicate glass. The electrodes contained (in mm): 140 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 EGTA, 1 CaCl, 4 K2ATP, pH 7.2, with KOH. The external bathing solution was constantly perfused (2–3 ml/min) and contained (in mm): 145 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 0.5 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 5 d-glucose, pH 7.4, with NaOH. Outward hKv7.4 channel current traces were generated with depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of −80 mV and stepped to varying step potentials (ΔV = 10 mV). Currents were measured after capacitance compensation and series resistance compensation (6–8 megaohms) (nominally 70–90%), filtered at 2 kHz using an 8-pole Bessel filter, and sampled at 5 kHz. Liquid junction potentials were less than 2 mV (1.4 ± 0.3 mV, n = 11). Whole cell K+ current amplitude at varying test potentials was measured at steady-state levels using a steady-state detection routine; the current was divided by the cell capacitance (pF) to generate the current density-voltage relationship. Analyses of data were performed using custom-made software and MicroCal Origin (Northampton, MA) programs. Pooled data are presented as means ± S.D. Multiple comparisons versus control data were performed using t test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (Dunn's method). Whole-cell K+ currents were normalized and plotted against the step potential. Continuous curves were generated from the Boltzmann function I/Imax = (1 + (exp(V½ − V)/km)), where V½ is the half-activation voltage, km = RT/zF is the slope factor, I is the magnitude of the current, and Imax denotes the maximum current magnitude. Assuming that K+ channel monomers assemble to form a conducting pore and because stoichiometric combination of the WT and mutant monomers should be stochastic, the probability of forming a functional channel with only WT monomers (PWT only) can be described by a polynomial distribution with the proportion of WT monomers (pWT) available to the nth power (PWT only = pWTn), where n is the number of monomers present in a channel (20).
Immunostaining
The primary antibodies used were: mouse monoclonal anti-hKv7.4 (NeuroMab, Davis, CA), mouse monoclonal anti-HA (Covance, Emeryville, CA), rabbit polyclonal anti-HA, chicken polyclonal anti-c-Myc, rabbit polyclonal anti-cytochrome P450 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), mouse monoclonal anti-early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1), mouse monoclonal anti-golgin A4 (P230), and mouse monoclonal anti-golgin A2 (Golgi matrix protein of 130 kDa) (BD Biosciences) in 1 μg/ml final concentration. The secondary antibodies were: donkey anti-mouse-Cy3, donkey anti-mouse-Cy5, donkey anti-rabbit-Cy3, donkey anti-rabbit-Cy5, and donkey anti-chicken-Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) in the manufacturer's recommended concentrations. CHO cells were incubated 24 h after transfection and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min followed by PBS washing. To use anti-hKv7.4 antibody and to study intracellular localization, cells were permeabilized and blocked in 0.1% Triton X-100, 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 5% normal donkey serum in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. For plasma membrane staining against HA and c-Myc tags, cells were blocked in 3% BSA and 5% normal donkey serum in 1× PBS without Triton X-100 permeabilization. Cells were incubated in primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, washed with chilled (4οC) PBS three times, and incubated in secondary antibodies at room temperature for 90 min followed by 5 min of DAPI staining with PBS washing. Slides were mounted with ProLong Gold mounting medium (Invitrogen), and images were taken using confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM510). Unless indicated otherwise, reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
RESULTS
Mutations at multiple sites on the hKv7.4 channel have been identified to be associated with post-lingual high frequency-predominant hearing loss. The diversity of mutational sites and the heterogeneity of the hereditary disease coupled with varying symptoms ranging from early to late onset progressive hearing loss raise the possibility that the ensuing functional phenotypes of the mutant channels may differ. Shown in Fig. 1 is a graphical representation of the eight identified mutation sites (in red) at the transmembrane, pore loop, and C-terminal segments of the predicted hKv7.4 channel structure. Table 1 shows that one of the hKv7.4 mutations has been found across racial differences, suggesting that this site may represent a mutational hotspot (4). To determine the functional phenotypes of the known mutations, we first examined the properties of the WT hKv7.4 expressed in CHO cells, using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a transfection marker. In contrast to untransfected and GFP alone-transfected CHO cells (Fig. 2A), hKv7.4-transfected cells yielded robust outward currents traces (Fig. 2B) in response to voltage steps ranging from −100 to 40 mV from a holding voltage of −80 mV. As is evident in Fig. 2, C and D, the activation voltage of hKv7.4 channel current was ∼−60 mV, and the half-activation voltage (V½) and the slope factor, k, derived from the Boltzmann function were (in mV); −31 ± 1 (n = 17) and 11.9 ± 0.5 (n = 17), respectively. The deactivation time constants (in ms) ranged from 17 ± 3 at −120 mV to 139 ± 20 at −20 mV (n = 15; Fig. 2E). Next, we compared differences between the WT hKv7.4 current magnitude and outward current recorded from CHO cells transfected with pore mutants L274H, W276S, L281S, G285C, and G296S (Fig. 3). None of the pore mutants yielded measurable outward currents as compared with the WT hKv7.4 channel (Fig. 3, A–G).
K+ channels consist of four pore-forming α-subunits (21). Mutations at the pore-forming region can cripple current conduction properties of the channel. The resulting dominant negative (DN) subunit, when co-assembled with the WT subunit, results in a non-functional channel (8). To examine whether the pore mutants were acting in a DN fashion, we transfected the WT and MT channel subunits singly, as seen in Fig. 3, and co-transfected the two channel subunits (WT and MT) at different ratios (WT:MT). Shown in Fig. 4, A–C, are the current traces recorded for WT:W276S ratios 1:0, 1:1, and 1:3. The corresponding current-density and voltage relationships are depicted in Fig. 4D. Comparing the WT (1:0) and WT:MT (1:1) currents, the steady-state voltage-dependent activations fitted with a Boltzmann function were unaltered (in mV, WT, V½ = −32 ± 2, k = 11.9 ± 1 (n = 11); WT:MT (1:1), V½, = −29 ± 2, k = 11.9 ± 0.5 (n = 11), p = 0.3) (Fig. 4E). Assuming the predicted tetrameric structure of K+ channels (20), we calculated the expected current magnitude when the WT hKv7.4 channel is co-expressed with a DN mutant at different ratios. We have illustrated the expected results in Fig. 4F with a dashed line. The experimental data points (in symbols) for the pore mutants noticeably suggested that none of the mutant channels operated in a classical DN fashion (Fig. 4F). A straightforward but accurate mechanism to produce functional amputation of a channel is to accelerate the kinetics of deactivation (22). We examined the time constants (τ) of activation and tail currents produced by the wild-type and mixtures of wild-type and pore loop mutant channels (Table 2). The activation τ values were described by two components (fast and slow), and most of the pore mutants showed substantial changes in the τ values of activation. Additionally, the deactivation τ values were also altered in some mutants (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
τactivation (40 mV) |
τdeactivation (−40 mV), τ (ms) | ||
---|---|---|---|
τfast (ms) | τslow (ms) | ||
WT | 107 ± 14 | 698 ± 71 | 178 ± 38 |
F182L | 83 ± 21* | 587 ± 90* | 111 ± 48 |
WT:F182L | 91 ± 19* | 496 ± 81** | 137 ± 16* |
WT:L274H | 114 ± 16 | 683 ± 28 | 158 ± 15 |
WT:W276S | 174 ± 40** | 629 ± 40* | 142 ± 15 |
WT:L281S | 87 ± 13** | 466 ± 79** | 110 ± 49 |
WT:G285S | 85 ± 26 | 488 ± 87** | 129 ± 28* |
WT:G296S | 75 ± 18** | 458 ± 85** | 121 ± 37* |
WT:G321S | 64 ± 14** | 591 ± 81* | 149 ± 32 |
Next, we examined mutations outside the pore of hKv7.4 channel that have been ascribed to DFNA2. Mutation F182L in the S3 transmembrane domain of hKv7.4 has been associated with profound pre-lingual deafness in a Taiwanese patient with non-syndromic deafness (23). To determine the cellular mechanisms of the disease, we expressed F182L singly and at different ratios with the WT subunit. CHO cells transfected with F182L mutant DNA yielded robust current that was visibly similar to the wild-type channel current in terms of both magnitude and kinetics (Fig. 5, A–G). Additionally, transfection with mixtures of F182L and the WT DNA produced currents with comparable magnitudes (Fig. 5, C–E), voltage-dependent activation properties, and deactivation time constants (Fig. 5, F and G).
A site at the C-terminal of the hKv7.4 channel has also been identified in a Dutch family that bears the mutation G321S, which is thought to be the underlying etiology for the post-lingual progressive non-syndromic hearing loss in these patients (16). CHO cells transfected with the G321S mutant DNA yielded no measurable current as compared with the WT channel (data not shown). Co-transfection of the G321S and the WT DNA at different ratios produced sizable currents, which were smaller in magnitude as compared with CHO cells transfected with the WT channel alone (Fig. 6, A–D). The voltage-dependent activation properties (Fig. 6E) and deactivation kinetics of the WT:G321S 1:1 mixture (Table 2) and WT alone currents were not substantially different. However, activation kinetics were significantly different (Table 2).
An important assumption that is implicit in the analysis performed and described in Fig. 4F regarding the predicted current magnitude after co-transfection of MT hKv7.4 and the WT DNA is that the two subunits are synthesized and trafficked independently and then assembled in equivalent ratiometric proportions at the plasmalemma (8, 20). Any tilt in the scales of the aforementioned processes should result in deviations from the predicted results, as demonstrated (Fig. 4F). To understand the cellular mechanisms that explain why MT-hKv7.4 channel expressed in CHO cells did not yield current (Figs. 2–3), we determined the cell surface expression of Kv7.4 channels. To detect cell surface expression of wild-type and MT-hKv7.4 channels, we used HA and c-Myc epitope tags in the extracellular loop between S1–S2 transmembrane domains. Farnesylated GFP was used as reporter for the plasma membrane. HA- and c-Myc-tagged hKv7.4 channels yielded currents that were similar to the untagged channels (supplemental Fig. S1). As shown in supplemental Fig. S2, HA- and c-Myc-tagged wild-type hKv7.4 channels were labeled mainly in the plasma membrane in non-permeabilized (NP) cells as compared with Kv7.4 antibody labeling directed against the intracellular N-terminal of the channel, which did not show positive reactivity in NP conditions. In keeping with the functional data, and as demonstrated in Fig. 7, the wild-type and F182L channels were synthesized, trafficked, and localized robustly in the plasma membrane. Moreover, the pore mutant W276S and the C-terminal mutant G321S were synthesized but not localized in the plasma membrane, suggesting that these MT channels had impaired trafficking mechanisms (Fig. 7). Indeed, all of the pore mutants, L274H, L281S, G285C, and G296S, did not show plasma membrane localization when expressed singly (supplemental Fig. S3), indicating defective membrane trafficking. However, under dominant gene diseased conditions, the WT gene product is expected to be synthesized together with the MT subunit in heterozygote patients. Thus, we determined whether the expression of the WT subunit may facilitate mutant-subunit trafficking by co-expressing c-Myc-tagged WT and HA-tagged MT subunits in CHO cells. In contrast to the lack of mutant channel trafficking when expressed alone (Fig. 7 and supplemental Fig. S3), we demonstrated that expression of the MT subunits in conjunction with the WT subunit promotes trafficking and plasma membrane localization of the MT channels W276S and G321S (Fig. 8). Similarly, co-expression of the WT subunit with the mutants L274H, L281S, G285C, and G296S resulted in membrane localization of the mutant channels (supplemental Fig. S4).
Finally, we determined the subcellular organelle retention of HA-tagged mutant hKv7.4 channels in permeabilized CHO cells using anti-cytochrome P450 as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), anti-golgin A4 (P230) as trans-Golgi, anti-golgin A2 (GM130) as cis-Golgi, and anti-early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) as endosome markers. Invariably, a substantial portion of the expressed mutant channels was identified mainly in the ER. Using the reported transmembrane mutant F182L, pore mutant W276S, and the C-terminal mutant G321S as examples, we show that the non-functional mutant channels are retained largely in the ER (Fig. 9). Thus, our analyses of the functional and cellular mechanisms of the reported mutations of hKv7.4 channel have revealed surprising, yet intricate, results that cannot be explained solely by the heteromeric interaction between the wild-type and mutant channels in the diseased conditions.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we have confirmed impaired cell surface expression of the pore segment mutation G296S of hKv7.4 (18) and have demonstrated that all known pore region mutations of the channel that have been reported to cause progressive hearing loss in humans (L274H, W276S, L281S, and G285C) exhibit similar expression phenotype. Functionally, none of the pore segment mutants yielded measurable current. Moreover, co-expression of the pore segment mutants with the wild-type subunits facilitates plasma membrane expression of the mutant channels, suggesting that the expected dominant diseased conditions may be complicated by unequal and interdependent trafficking of the two-channel subunits. The ensuing membrane current cannot be explained simply by predictions of independent heteromultimerization of the wild-type and mutant channels and/or by the DN effect of the mutant. Thus, the dependence of cell surface expression of the mutant on wild-type channels is the likely explanation for the deviation from the expected current magnitude using the analyses described in Fig. 4F. The C-terminal mutant G321S had expression phenotype that was similar to the pore region mutants. We also explored the possibility that a mechanism that can amputate a channel would be to accelerate the kinetics of deactivation (22). Although in some cases of WT:MT co-expression (Table 2), the deactivation time constants were abbreviated, the changes were modest, making it an unlikely mechanism to be the underlying cause for the disease. Cell organelle retention of the mutant channels occurs mainly at the level of the ER, suggesting that pore and C-terminal mutations of hKv7.4 constitute ER retention (24). On the contrary, the plasma membrane expression and electrophysiological phenotype of the transmembrane mutant F182L were similar to wild-type channels (23), raising the possibility that the identified mutation may not be responsible for the non-syndromic deafness associated with the reported patient. From this foothold, this report has probed the underlying cellular and functional mechanisms for the non-syndromic progressive hearing loss associated with mutations of the hKv7.4 channel.
Mutations of hKv7.4 have global impact. The locus for DFNA2 was originally linked to chromosome 1 by linkage analysis in Indonesian, American, and Dutch families with progressive hearing impairment (16) and localized to the 1p34 region by analysis in a Belgian family and two Dutch families (17). Subsequent to the cloning of the hKV7.4 gene and mapping to 1p34 (2), mutant screenings of autosomal dominant progressive hearing loss patients, without linkage analysis, have identified mutations in European, American, Japanese, and Taiwanese families (Table 1).
Typically, the symptoms of DFNA2 patients from different families are similar through generations but not identical. Deafness develops slowly over decades, is post-lingual, and is presented as a symmetrical impairment. The disease begins as loss of high frequency hearing and progresses to middle and low frequencies within the next decade, without vestibular defect (4, 8). Moreover, the symptoms are not identical among these families, such as the age of onset and the presence of tinnitus. For example, in most patients, the onset of symptoms ranged from 5 to 15 years old, developing to severe hearing loss by ∼50 years old. Although tinnitus was not reported in Dutch, Japanese, and Spanish families having W276S, G321S, and G296S mutations, in one American family with ancestors from France and Luxembourg, patients with the G285C mutation have profound hearing loss by the age of 40 with severe tinnitus (16). Meanwhile, in another American family with Austrian ancestry and having the L281S mutation, hearing loss was reported as early as age 3, high frequency hearing loss was diagnosed by age 6, and profound tinnitus was reported in most patients (25). W276S mutations were found in multiple families, but it was shown that these families did not have similar genetic background by microsatellite analysis and intragenic single nucleotide polymorphism methods (3, 26).
Unlike the pore region and C-terminal mutations found in 3–5 generations of families around the world with post-lingual hearing loss, the transmembrane segment mutation F182L has been identified in only one patient with pre-lingual profound deafness in a mutation screening of a non-syndromic deaf patient in Taiwan (23). Moreover, no other family member of the Taiwanese patient was identified to have hearing loss. Along with the similar electrophysiological features and cell surface localization of the F182L mutant channel, the apparent F182L mutation may not be responsible for the reported non-syndromic deafness of the patient but rather the result of polymorphism, as seen in KCNE in Caucasian population with Ménière disease (27). Thus, the hearing loss in the F182L mutant patient may ensue from an unknown etiological mechanism of deafness that requires further investigations.
Although the cellular and functional mechanisms of the pore segment and C-terminal mutants of hKv7.4 are to a rough approximation similar, differences in age of onset and symptoms of DFNA2 patients endure. The M-current, the phenotypic current derived from Kv7 channels, dictates the resting potential of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons (7), and it is expected that reduction in the current magnitude in disease conditions will confer membrane depolarization, resulting in increased excess intracellular Ca2+ and Ca2+-induced cell death (6, 7, 28). The progressive nature of the disease may reflect age-induced reduction in expression of the channels. However, the properties of the native M-current in hair cells and spiral ganglia neurons may be obscured by the findings that the current is regulated not only by the promiscuous interaction of Kv7.2–5 channels (8) but also by their accessory subunits KCNEs and by interaction with Kv11 channels (29–32). Thus, results determined from CHO cells may differ from the properties of channels expressed in hair cells and neurons. It is also conceivable that differences in disease onset and symptoms may ensue from the association of the mutant channels and their accessory subunits.
Another disposing factor that may precipitate different symptomatic outcomes of the disease is exposure to legitimate drugs that have pharmacological impact on hKv7.4 channels. For example, salicylate, one of the most commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the world, has a side effect of inducing temporary hearing loss and tinnitus (33, 34). Although previous studies have implicated salicylate-induced tinnitus to the drug-mediated increased cochlear arachidonic acid level and subsequent enhancement of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor responses to glutamate (35, 36), other studies have attributed the cellular mechanisms of salicylate to impaired sound amplification by outer hair cells through salicylate action on electromotility (37–39). Moreover, salicylate concentrations required to mimic these effects are not in keeping with the serum salicylate concentrations (34). Recently, it has been demonstrated that the physiological target for salicylate-induced ototoxicity is the Kv7 channels (33). Thus, variable exposure to salicylate by DFNA2 patients may dictate the onset of the disease.
Previous studies have demonstrated that expression of G285S in heterologous expression systems yielded no measurable current (2, 8). Meanwhile, co-expression of the wild-type and the mutant subunits at different ratios produced current magnitudes, which were in keeping with the G285S serving as a DN mutant (2, 8). Here, it appears that replacement of serine to cysteine at the pore region of hKv7.4 alters channel trafficking and plasma membrane expression. It is conceivable that upon cell surface expression, the G285C mutant may produce a DN effect on the wild-type channel. Moreover, the results point to the intricate and complex mechanisms involved in the etiology of DFNA2.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank members of our laboratory for constructive comments.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants through DC010386 and DC007592 the NIDCD (to E. N. Y.).
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S4.
- MT
- mutant
- ER
- endoplasmic reticulum
- DN
- dominant negative
- NP
- non-permeabilized
- F
- Farads.
REFERENCES
- 1. Cooper E. C. (2001) Epilepsia 42, Suppl. 5, 49–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kubisch C., Schroeder B. C., Friedrich T., Lütjohann B., El-Amraoui A., Marlin S., Petit C., Jentsch T. J. (1999) Cell 96, 437–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Van Camp G., Coucke P. J., Akita J., Fransen E., Abe S., De Leenheer E. M., Huygen P. L., Cremers C. W., Usami S. (2002) Hum. Mutat. 20, 15–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jentsch T. J. (2000) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 21–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Casimiro M. C., Knollmann B. C., Yamoah E. N., Nie L., Vary J. C., Jr., Sirenko S. G., Greene A. E., Grinberg A., Huang S. P., Ebert S. N., Pfeifer K. (2004) Genomics 84, 555–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Holt J. R., Stauffer E. A., Abraham D., Géléoc G. S. (2007) J. Neurosci. 27, 8940–8951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Oliver D., Knipper M., Derst C., Fakler B. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 2141–2149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xu T., Nie L., Zhang Y., Mo J., Feng W., Wei D., Petrov E., Calisto L. E., Kachar B., Beisel K. W., Vazquez A. E., Yamoah E. N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 23899–23909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Diaz R. C., Vazquez A. E., Dou H., Wei D., Cardell E. L., Lingrel J., Shull G. E., Doyle K. J., Yamoah E. N. (2007) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8, 422–434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Beisel K. W., Rocha-Sanchez S. M., Morris K. A., Nie L., Feng F., Kachar B., Yamoah E. N., Fritzsch B. (2005) J. Neurosci. 25, 9285–9293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hudspeth A. J. (1989) Nature 341, 397–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Davis H. (1972) Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 81, 750–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jentsch T. J., Steinmeyer K., Schwarz G. (1990) Nature 348, 510–514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wangemann P. (2002) Hear Res. 165, 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kharkovets T., Dedek K., Maier H., Schweizer M., Khimich D., Nouvian R., Vardanyan V., Leuwer R., Moser T., Jentsch T. J. (2006) EMBO J. 25, 642–652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Coucke P., Van Camp G., Djoyodiharjo B., Smith S. D., Frants R. R., Padberg G. W., Darby J. K., Huizing E. H., Cremers C. W., Kimberling W. J., et al. (1994) N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 425–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Van Camp G., Coucke P. J., Kunst H., Schatteman I., Van Velzen D., Marres H., van Ewijk M., Declau F., Van Hauwe P., Meyers J., Kenyon J., Smith S. D., Smith R. J., Djelantik B., Cremers C. W., Van de Heyning P. H., Willems P. J. (1997) Genomics 41, 70–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mencía A., González-Nieto D., Modamio-Høybjør S., Etxeberría A., Aránguez G., Salvador N., Del Castillo I., Villarroel A., Moreno F., Barrio L., Moreno-Pelayo M. A. (2008) Hum. Genet. 123, 41–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Schwake M., Pusch M., Kharkovets T., Jentsch T. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 13343–13348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. MacKinnon R. (1991) Nature 350, 232–235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tinker A., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. (1996) Cell 87, 857–868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chouabe C., Neyroud N., Guicheney P., Lazdunski M., Romey G., Barhanin J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5472–5479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Su C. C., Yang J. J., Shieh J. C., Su M. C., Li S. Y. (2007) Audiol. Neurootol. 12, 20–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Margeta-Mitrovic M., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. (2000) Neuron 27, 97–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Talebizadeh Z., Kelley P. M., Askew J. W., Beisel K. W., Smith S. D. (1999) Hum. Mutat. 14, 493–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Topsakal V., Pennings R. J., te Brinke H., Hamel B., Huygen P. L., Kremer H., Cremers C. W. (2005) Otol. Neurotol. 26, 52–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Campbell C. A., Della Santina C. C., Meyer N. C., Smith N. B., Myrie O. A., Stone E. M., Fukushima K., Califano J., Carey J. P., Hansen M. R., Gantz B. J., Minor L. B., Smith R. J. (2010) Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152A, 67–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lv P., Wei D., Yamoah E. N. (2010) J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34699–35707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Abbott G. W., Goldstein S. A. (2002) FASEB J. 16, 390–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Abbott G. W., Sesti F., Splawski I., Buck M. E., Lehmann M. H., Timothy K. W., Keating M. T., Goldstein S. A. (1999) Cell 97, 175–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ohyama H., Kajita H., Omori K., Takumi T., Hiramoto N., Iwasaka T., Matsuda H. (2001) Pflugers Arch. 442, 329–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ehrlich J. R., Pourrier M., Weerapura M., Ethier N., Marmabachi A. M., Hébert T. E., Nattel S. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1233–1241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wu T., Lv P., Kim H. J., Yamoah E. N., Nuttall A. L. (2010) J. Neurophysiol. 103, 1969–1977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cazals Y. (2000) Prog. Neurobiol. 62, 583–631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Guitton M. J., Caston J., Ruel J., Johnson R. M., Pujol R., Puel J. L. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 3944–3952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ruel J., Chabbert C., Nouvian R., Bendris R., Eybalin M., Leger C. L., Bourien J., Mersel M., Puel J. L. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28, 7313–7323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kakehata S., Santos-Sacchi J. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 4881–4889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lue A. J., Brownell W. E. (1999) Hear Res. 135, 163–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hallworth R. (1997) Hear Res. 114, 204–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Coucke P. J., Van Hauwe P., Kelley P. M., Kunst H., Schatteman I., Van Velzen D., Meyers J., Ensink R. J., Verstreken M., Declau F., Marres H., Kastury K., Bhasin S., McGuirt W. T., Smith R. J., Cremers C. W., Van de Heyning P., Willems P. J., Smith S. D., Van Camp G. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1321–1328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Akita J., Abe S., Shinkawa H., Kimberling W. J., Usami S. (2001) J. Hum. Genet. 46, 355–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Van Hauwe P., Coucke P. J., Ensink R. J., Huygen P., Cremers C. W., Van Camp G. (2000) Am. J. Med. Genet. 93, 184–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kamada F., Kure S., Kudo T., Suzuki Y., Oshima T., Ichinohe A., Kojima K., Niihori T., Kanno J., Narumi Y., Narisawa A., Kato K., Aoki Y., Ikeda K., Kobayashi T., Matsubara Y. (2006) J. Hum. Genet. 51, 455–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.