Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2010 Aug 25;48(11):4156–4160. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02346-09

Characterization of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Swine in Three Michigan Counties

Susan M Donabedian 1, Mary Beth Perri 1, Nodira Abdujamilova 2, Mary Joy Gordoncillo 2, Amir Naqvi 2, Katherine C Reyes 1, Marcus J Zervos 1,3,*, Paul Bartlett 2
PMCID: PMC3020891  PMID: 20739498

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci are a major cause of nosocomial infections but are rarely found in humans in the community and have not been identified in food animals in the United States. We evaluated a total of 360 fecal specimens from humans and their animals being raised for exhibit at three county fairs in Michigan. Fecal samples from 158 humans, 55 swine, 50 cattle, 25 horses, 57 sheep, 14 goats, and 1 llama were obtained and plated onto Enterococcosel agar containing 16 μg/ml of vancomycin. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) was isolated from six pigs but not from humans or any animal other than pigs. All six VREF isolates had a MIC to vancomycin of ≥256 μg/ml and contained the vanA gene. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of the six VREF isolates were ≥80% similar. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed sequence type 5 (ST5) (n = 2), ST6 (n = 3), and ST185 (n = 1), which are E. faecium sequence types belonging to clonal complex 5 (CC5). These findings show the dissemination of VREF strains among pigs in three Michigan counties. This is the first report of VRE found in food animals in the United States.


Enterococci are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients in the United States. In a 2006-2007 report to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Enterococcus species were the second most common pathogen in U.S. hospitals (29). Although enterococci are commensal organisms in the guts of most animals, their intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobial agents and their ability to efficiently acquire antibiotic resistance determinants make them a particular threat in the hospital setting, causing serious wound infections, bacteremia, and endocarditis (44, 66). Widespread use of vancomycin and extended-spectrum cephalosporins in U.S. hospitals likely contributed to the emergence and dramatic increase of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) over the past 20 years (18, 35). Vancomycin resistance is most commonly found in Enterococcus faecium and is encoded by the vanA gene cluster carried on the mobile genetic element Tn1546 (4). Antimicrobial agents, including several classes of antibiotics used in humans (e.g., β-lactams, cephalosporins, tetracyclines, macrolides, and streptogramins), are used on U.S. farms for growth promotion as well as therapeutically, and many studies have reported antibiotic-resistant enterococci in food animals and retail meat in the United States (16, 17, 26-28, 43, 51, 60). Glycopeptides, however, have never been permitted for use on farms in the United States. VRE have not been isolated from food animals or retail meat in the United States and have only rarely been found in companion animals, the environment, and humans without hospital exposure in the community (10, 42, 48, 52).

In Europe, the glycopeptide avoparcin was used for growth promotion on farms for many years. When it was found that VRE could commonly be isolated from food animals, retail meats, and humans in the community, the use of avoparcin for growth promotion was banned, first in Denmark in 1995, and later in the entire European Union in 1997 (1, 5, 6, 36, 56, 57, 59). Despite the high rate of VRE in farm animals and humans in the community, nosocomial infections with VRE in Europe were not common and still occur at a lower rate than in U.S. hospitals. This has been attributed to less use of vancomycin and extended-spectrum cephalosporins in European hospitals (35). Recently, there have been reports of increasing numbers of infections with VRE in hospitalized patients in European countries (3, 21, 34, 37, 46, 64). A specific clonal complex of E. faecium strains, clonal complex 17 (CC17), has been responsible for outbreaks in hospitals worldwide, including the United States (7, 38, 39, 45, 64). The development of ampicillin resistance, possession of virulence genes such as esp and hyl, and the acquisition of vancomycin resistance gave E. faecium strains from CC17 the advantages needed to adapt to the hospital environment (49, 50, 63, 64). In a recent study, a functional collagen adhesion gene (acm) was also described as a likely contributor to the increased virulence of CC17 strains causing serious infections, such as endocarditis (45). Although E. faecium strains in CC17 are associated with epidemicity in hospitals, there has been a report of a CC17 strain in swine from Portugal (20). Conversely, several studies in Europe have reported finding swine-adapted E. faecium CC5 strains in humans (3, 11, 12, 20, 23, 30, 33).

In this study, we surveyed members of 4-H organizations from three counties in Michigan and evaluated human and animal fecal samples in order to determine whether vancomycin-resistant enterococci were present in these populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and sample collection.

Three county 4-H organizations were selected for this study because of their active animal husbandry programs. In these programs, 4-H members personally raised one or perhaps a few animals for exhibit at the July or August 2008 county fair. Adolescents, parents, and other adult supervisors participating in these 4-H organizations were invited to complete a risk factor survey, submit a fecal specimen from themselves, and submit a fecal specimen from the farm animal (bovine, porcine, equine, caprine, or camelid) to which they had the most contact. In instances where there was close contact with a second farm species, a fecal specimen was also obtained from that animal. Study participants were monetarily compensated for their contribution. The study was reviewed and approved by the Michigan State University Institutional Review Board. Study subjects completed a survey regarding animal exposure, hospitalization, current or previous diarrheal illness, use of antibiotics, and other sources of enteric pathogens. Risk factors were analyzed for association with VRE results by using the mid-P exact test, prevalence ratio with 95% confidence limits, and Student's t test.

Samples were placed in Cary-Blair transport medium (MCC, Torrance, CA) and maintained on ice or refrigerated until reaching the laboratory (within 3 to 4 days), where they were kept at −20°C until processing.

Isolation, identification, and antimicrobial testing of enterococci.

Fecal samples were plated onto Enterococcosel agar (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) containing 16 μg/ml of vancomycin and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Distinct morphological colony types displaying esculin hydrolysis were isolated, plated on Trypticase soy agar II (TSAII) (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD), and confirmed as enterococci using standard biochemical reactions (54). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for vancomycin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, linezolid, erythromycin, tetracycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were determined by E strip (bioMerieux, Solna, Sweden) using CLSI guidelines (9).

Detection of glycopeptide resistance genes and virulence genes esp and hyl.

PCR was performed to detect the presence of the glycopeptide resistance genes vanA and vanB by using a previously described method (8). Primers for amplification of genes for the virulence determinants enterococcal surface protein (esp) and hyaluronidase (hyl) were described previously (58).

Analysis of Tn1546.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) isolates were evaluated for polymorphisms in glycopeptide resistance determinant Tn1546. PCR was performed to amplify an internal fragment of the vanX gene by using primers from a previous study (31). The resulting 424-bp amplicon was digested with restriction enzyme DdeI (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA) to determine whether a previously described base pair variant at position 8234 was present (32). Previously described primers were used to detect the presence of IS1251 and to determine whether IS1216V was combined with the IS3-like element in the left end of Tn1546 (25, 31).

PFGE.

Genomic DNA was prepared in agarose plugs, digested with SmaI (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA), and run on a CHEF-DR III (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), as described previously (14). BioNumerics software version 3.5 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used to calculate the percent similarity (Dice coefficient) of SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding patterns. Isolates were considered related if their PFGE banding patterns were ≥80% similar.

MLST.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed to determine the evolutionary relationship between isolates using a previously described method (30). Fragments of the seven housekeeping genes from Enterococcus faecium (adk, atpA, ddl, gyd, gdh, purK, and pstS) were amplified, purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), sequenced using the BigDye Terminator version 1.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom), and analyzed on an ABI 3100 sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems). The eBURST V3 program, which can be accessed at http://efaecium.mlst.net, was used to assign a sequence type (ST) to each isolate according to its allelic profile (19).

RESULTS

Recovery of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Fecal specimens were collected from humans (n = 158), swine (n = 55), cattle (n = 50), horses (n = 25), sheep (n = 57), goats (n = 14), and llama (n = 1). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates were recovered from six pigs (10.9%). Four pigs were from county 1 (two were pen-mates), one was from county 2, and one was from county 3. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates were not recovered from humans, sheep, cattle, horses, goats, or the llama. There were no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis strains recovered in this study.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities.

The six VREF isolates had MICs to vancomycin of ≥256 μg/ml. All VREF isolates were also resistant to erythromycin and tetracycline and had intermediate resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin. All six VREF isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and linezolid and did not produce β-lactamase.

Glycopeptide resistance genes and virulence genes esp and hyl.

All six VREF isolates contained the vanA gene. All isolates were negative for the virulence genes esp and hyl.

Tn1546 analysis.

Analysis of Tn1546 for each isolate revealed a G-to-T mutation at position 8234 in the vanX gene. IS1216V combined with the IS3-like element at the left end of Tn1546 was detected in all isolates. IS1251 was not detected in any of the VREF isolates.

PFGE and MLST.

PFGE patterns of SmaI restriction fragments were ≥80% similar (Fig. 1 and 2). MLST analysis yielded sequence type 5 (ST5) (n = 2), ST6 (n = 3), and ST185 (n = 1). These sequence types belong to E. faecium clonal complex 5 (CC5).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

PFGE of SmaI-digested genomic DNA from six vanA-containing Enterococcus faecium isolates from swine in three Michigan counties.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Dendrogram showing comparisons of SmaI PFGE patterns for six vanA-containing Enterococcus faecium isolates from swine in three Michigan counties.

4-H participant interviews.

No owners were hospitalized within the previous 6 months; however, 2 of the 6 owners of VRE-positive pigs had outpatient treatment in the previous 6 months, and 1 resided with a health care worker who cared for human patients. During the previous 75 days, 3 of 49 owners of VRE-negative pigs and 2 of 6 owners of VRE-positive pigs had used antibiotics. One person with a VRE-positive pig had used amoxicillin and azithromycin 60 days previously, and the second had used cephalexin 60 days previously. Two of 49 owners of VRE-negative pigs received amoxicillin and 1 received Kefzol 60 days previously. Antibiotic use in owners was associated with having a VRE-positive pig at P = 0.047 by the mid-P exact test, with a prevalence ratio of 5.0 (1.2 to 21). One of the VRE-positive pigs received ceftiofur, an extended-spectrum cephalosporin, within 30 days of sampling. One VRE-negative pig received ceftiofur, and two received both oxytetracycline and tylosin. No statistical association was found between VRE in pigs and their exposure to antibiotics in the previous 30 days (P > 0.75 in all instances). There was no association between VRE carriage and a history of diarrhea in the pigs during the previous 14 days (P = 0.62).

DISCUSSION

This study provides the first description of high-level vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated from food animals in the United States. We found related strains of VREF in six pigs from three Michigan counties, indicating clonal transmission was at least partially responsible for the dissemination of vancomycin resistance. The vanA-containing E. faecium from swine in this study were part of CC5, which is widely disseminated in swine in Europe (12, 20, 47). The prevalence of E. faecium CC5 strains has not been described in the United States; however, it may be a predominant clone of E. faecium in swine in the United States as well. Characteristics of CC5 strains are in vitro susceptibility to ampicillin, possession of purK allele 9, and lack of virulence genes. Conversely, VREF from the hospital setting in the United States and elsewhere, particularly strains belonging to CC17, are resistant to ampicillin, have purK allele 1, and often contain multiple virulence determinants, such as esp, hyl, and acm (37, 45, 49, 64). Selective pressure from the environment, such as farm, community, or hospital, likely plays a significant role in determining the characteristics of VREF (41, 63, 64). It has been suggested that the CC5 lineage of E. faecium may have a fitness advantage in swine and could spread more readily than other, less adapted strains between swine and potentially between swine and humans (47). Many studies have shown that it is possible for the same strains of enterococci to infect both humans and farm animals (3, 6, 13, 23, 33, 53, 56). If large numbers of CC5 strains acquire vancomycin resistance, this could pose a health threat to humans since this also suggests the potential for the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in food. It is therefore important to determine the prevalence of CC5 strains in humans and farm animals in the United States and to continue to assess the extent to which these strains have acquired vancomycin resistance.

Enterococci are remarkable in their ability to disseminate antimicrobial resistance by a variety of routes. Since the vanA gene cluster is on a mobile genetic element, Tn1546, horizontal transmission of vancomycin resistance between different strains of enterococci occurs commonly. Many studies have demonstrated the transmission of Tn1546 between animals and humans (2, 32, 61, 65). There is often polymorphism in Tn1546, and these variations can be of use in tracing the source of VREF. There have been numerous descriptions of insertion sequences integrated into Tn1546, such as IS1216V, IS1251, IS1476, and IS1542 (22, 25, 31, 40, 65). Researchers in Denmark found a common base pair variation in vanX in which the base at position 8234 was either a G (as in the control VanA strain BM4147) or a T (31). They later evaluated 271 VREF isolates from pigs, poultry, and humans in several countries and found that all poultry and 64% of humans had a G at position number 8234 in vanX, while nearly all (97%) of pigs and 36% of humans had the variant T (32). Therefore, pigs and poultry had different variations of Tn1546, while humans had both types. The six VREF isolates in this study also had the variant T at position 8234 in vanX. Insertion sequences (IS) are commonly found in bacterial genomes and may facilitate transfer of resistance genes. IS1216V is commonly found in enterococci from both human and animal sources and can sometimes be present in multiple copies. IS1216V has also been found with an IS3-like element at the left end of Tn1546 (24). IS1251 is an insertion sequence which has been detected mainly in clinical isolates of VRE from the United States (15, 24, 25, 31). In this study, we found VREF from swine which shared many characteristics with VREF from swine in European studies (20, 23, 30-32, 47). All strains were part of E. faecium clonal complex 5, had the T variant of vanX, were positive for IS1216V linked to the IS3-like element at the left end of Tn1546, and were negative for IS1251.

There is clear evidence that with an increase in the consumption of antimicrobial agents by humans or animals, there is a resultant increase in antimicrobial resistance. It is likely that the use of avoparcin on farms in Europe resulted in high levels of VREF in farm animals and eventually humans in the community (5). Although it has been established that the use of antimicrobial drugs for growth promotion and therapeutic treatment in food animals selects bacteria among the normal intestinal flora of animals, whether it poses a risk to human health remains controversial. In this study, we found VREF in pigs that were not given glycopeptides. We found no association between antibiotic consumption in pigs and colonization with VREF; however, 2 of the 6 (33%) owners of pigs positive for VREF and 2 of the 49 (4%) owners of pigs negative for VREF received antibiotics within 60 days prior to specimen collection. We were not able to determine how the swine in this study acquired VREF; however, since the use of antimicrobial agents that lack in vitro activity against enterococci will create selective pressure to increase the emergence and dissemination of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, there is a need to prevent the misuse and overuse of these agents in both food-producing animals and humans.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the NIAID, NIH, DHHS, under the Food and Waterborne Diseases Integrated Research Network (NIH research contract N01-AI-30058).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 25 August 2010.

The authors have paid a fee to allow immediate free access to this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aarestrup, F. M. 1995. Occurrence of glycopeptide resistance among Enterococcus faecium isolated from conventional and ecological poultry farms. Microb. Drug Resist. 1:255-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aarestrup, F. M., P. Ahrens, M. Madsen, L. V. Pallesen, R. L. Poulsen, and H. Westh. 1996. Glycopeptide susceptibility among Danish Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates of animal and human origin and PCR identification of genes within the VanA cluster. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1938-1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abele-Horn, M., U. Vogel, I. Klare, C. Konstabel, R. Trabold, R. Kurihara, W. Witte, W. Kreth, P. G. Schlegel, and H. Claus. 2006. Molecular epidemiology of hospital-acquired vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4009-4013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arthur, M., C. Molinas, F. Depardieu, and P. Courvalin. 1993. Characterization of Tn1546, a Tn3-related transposon conferring glycopeptide resistance by synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147. J. Bacteriol. 175:117-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bager, F., M. Madsen, J. Christensen, and F. M. Aarestrup. 1997. Avoparcin used as a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on Danish poultry and pig farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 31:95-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bates, J., J. Jordens, and D. T. Griffith. 1994. Farm animals as a putative reservoir for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections in man. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 34:507-516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Camargo, I. L. B. C., M. S. Gilmore, and A. L. C. Darini. 2006. Multilocus sequence typing and analysis of putative factors in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from Brazil. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:1123-1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clark, N. C., R. C. Cooksey, B. C. Hill, J. M. Swenson, and F. C. Tenover. 1993. Characterization of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci from U.S. hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2311-2317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2009. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 19th informational supplement. CLSI M100-S19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 10.Coque, T. M., J. F. Tomayko, S. C. Ricke, P. C. Okhyusen, and B. E. Murray. 1996. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from nosocomial, community, and animal sources in the United States. 40:2605-2609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Coque, T. M., R. J. L. Willems, J. Fortún, J. Top, S. Diz, E. Loza, R. Cantón, and F. Baquero. 2005. Population structure of Enterococcus faecium causing bacteremia in a Spanish university hospital: setting the scene for a future increase in vancomycin resistance? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2693-2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De Leener, E., A. Martel, E. M. De Graef, J. Top, P. Butaye, F. Haesebrouck, R. Willems, and A. Decostere. 2005. Molecular analysis of human, porcine, and poultry Enterococcus faecium isolates and their erm (B) genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2766-2770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Descheemaeker, P. R. M., S. Chapelle, L. A. Devriese, P. Butaye, P. Vandamme, and H. Goossens. 1999. Comparison of glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates and glycopeptide resistance genes of human and animal origins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2032-2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Donabedian, S. M., J. W. Chow, D. M. Shlaes, M. Green, and M. J. Zervos. 1995. DNA hybridization and contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis for identification of enterococci to the species level. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:141-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Donabedian, S., E. Hershberger, L. A. Thal, J. W. Chow, D. B. Clewell, B. Robinson-Dunn, and M. J. Zervos. 2000. PCR fragment length polymorphism analysis of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2885-2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Donabedian, S. M., L. A. Thal, E. Hershberger, M. B. Perri, J. W. Chow, P. Bartlett, R. Jones, K. Joyce, S. Rossiter, K. Gay, J. Johnson, C. Mackinson, E. DeBess, J. Madden, F. Angulo, and M. J. Zervos. 2003. Molecular characterization of gentamicin-resistant enterococci in the United States: evidence of spread from animals to humans through food. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1109-1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Donabedian, S. M., M. B. Perri, D. Vager, E. Hershberger, P. Malani, S. Simjee, J. Chow, E. N. Vergis, R. R. Muder, K. Gay, F. J. Angulo, P. Bartlett, and M. J. Zervos. 2006. Quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in Enterococcus faecium isolates from humans, farm animals, and grocery store meat in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3361-3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Edmond, M. B., J. F. Ober, D. L. Weinbaum, M. A. Pfaller, T. Hwang, M. D. Sanford, and R. P. Wenzel. 1995. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: risk factors for infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:1126-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feil, E. J., B. C. Li, D. M. Aanensen, W. P. Hanage, and B. G. Spratt. 2004. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 186:1518-1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Freitas, A. R., C. Novais, F. Baquero, T. M. Coque, and L. Peixe. 2009. International spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (CC17, CC5) and Enterococcus faecalis CC2 among animals and humans, abstr. P-840. Abstr. 19th Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., Helsinki, Finland.
  • 21.Goossens, H., D. Jabes, R. Rossi, C. Lammens, G. Privitera, and P. Courvalin. 2003. European survey of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in at-risk hospital wards and in vitro susceptibility testing of ramoplanin against these isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51(Suppl. 3):5-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hammerum, A. M., V. Fussing, F. M. Aarestrup, and H. C. Wegener. 2000. Characterization of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium isolates from humans, chickens and pigs by RiboPrinting and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:677-680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hammerum, A. M., C. H. Lester, J. Neimann, L. J. Porsbo, K. E. P. Olsen, L. B. Jensen, H. D. Emborg, H. C. Wegener, and N. Frimodt-Moller. 2004. A vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolate from a Danish healthy volunteer, detected 7 years after the ban of avoparcin, is possibly related to pig isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53(Suppl. 3):547-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Handwerger, S., J. Skoble, L. F. Discotto, and M. J. Pucci. 1995. Heterogeneity of the vanA gene cluster in clinical isolates of enterococci from the northeastern United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:362-368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Handwerger, S., and Justin Skoble. 1995. Identification of chromosomal mobile element conferring high-level vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2446-2453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayes, J. R., A. C. McIntosh, S. Qaiyumi, J. A. Johnson, L. L. English, L. E. Carr, D. D. Wagner, and S. W. Joseph. 2001. High-frequency recovery of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from the poultry production environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2298-2299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayes, J. R., L. L. English, P. J. Carter, T. Proescholdt, K. Y. Lee, D. D. Wagner, and D. G. White. 2003. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus species isolated from retail meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69(12):7153-7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hershberger, E., S. F. Oprea, S. M. Donabedian, M. Perri, P. Bozigar, P. Bartlett, and M. J. Zervos. 2005. Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:127-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hidron, A. I., J. R. Edwards, J. Patel, T. C. Horan, D. M. Sievert, D. A. Pollock, and S. K. Fridkin for the National Healthcare Safety Network Team and Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. 2008. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 9:996-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Homan, W. L., D. Tribe, S. Poznanski, M. Li, G. Hogg, E. Spalburg, J. D. A. van Embden, and R. J. L. Willems. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1963-1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jensen, L. B., P. Ahrens, L. Dons, R. N. Jones, A. M. Hammerum, and F. M. Aarestrup. 1998. Molecular analysis of Tn1546 in Enterococcus faecium isolated from animals and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:437-442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jensen, L. B. 1998. Differences in the occurrence of two base pair variants of Tn1546 from vancomycin-resistant enterococci from humans, pigs, and poultry. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2463-2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jensen, L. B., A. M. Hammerum, R. L. Poulsen, and H. Westh. 1999. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains with highly similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns containing similar Tn1546-like elements isolated from a hospitalized patient and pigs in Denmark. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:724-725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jones, M. E., D. C. Draghi, C. Thornsberry, J. A. Karlowsky, D. F. Sahm, and R. P. Wenzel. 2004. Emerging resistance among bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit—a European and North American surveillance study (2000-2002). Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 3:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kirst, H. A., D. G. Thompson, and T. I. Nicas. 1998. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1303-1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klare, I., H. Heier, H. Claus, G. Böhme, S. Marin, G. Seltmann, R. Hakenbeck, V. Antanassova, and W. Witte. 1995. Enterococcus faecium strains with vanA-mediated high-level glycopeptide resistance isolated from animal foodstuffs and fecal samples of humans in the community. Microb. Drug Resist. 1:265-272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klare, I., C. Konstabel, S. Mueller-Bertling, G. Werner, B. Strommenger, C. Kettlitz, S. Borgmann, B. Schulte, D. Jonas, A. Serr, A. M. Fahr, U. Eigner, and W. Witte. 2005. Spread of ampicillin/vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium of the epidemic-virulent clonal complex-17 carrying the genes esp and hyl in German hospitals. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 24:815-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ko, K. S., J. Y. Baek, J. Y. Lee, W. S. Oh, K. R. Peck, N. Y. Lee, W. G. Lee, K. Lee, and J. H. Song. 2005. Molecular characterization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2303-2306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leavis, H., J. Top., N. Shankar, K. Borgen, M. Bonten, J. van Embden, and R. J. Willems. 2004. A novel putative enterococcal pathogenicity island linked to the esp virulence gene of Enterococcus faecium and associated with epidemicity. J. Bacteriol. 186:672-682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mackinnon, M. G., M. A. Drebot, and G. J. Tyrrell. 1997. Identification and characterization of IS1476, an insertion sequence-like element that disrupts VanY function in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1805-1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martinez, J. L., and F. Baquero. 2002. Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:647-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McDonald, L. C., M. J. Kuehnert, F. C. Tenover, and W. R. Jarvis. 1997. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci outside the health care setting: prevalence, sources, and public health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:311-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McDonald, L. C., S. Rossiter, C. MacKinson, Y. Y. Wang, S. Johnson, M. Sullivan, R. Sokolow, E. DeBess, L. Gilbert, J. A. Benson, B. Hill, and F. J. Angulo. 2001. Quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on chicken and in human stool specimens. N. Engl. J. Med. 345:1155-1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Murray, B. E. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 342:710-721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nallapareddy, S. R., K. V. Singh, P. C. Okhuysen, and B. E. Murray. 2008. A functional collagen adhesin gene, acm, in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium correlates with the recent success of this emerging nosocomial pathogen. Infect. Immun. 76:4110-4119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Novais, C., J. C. Sousa, T. M. Coque, L. V. Peixe, and the Portuguese Resistance Study Group. 2005. Molecular characterization of glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from Portuguese hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3073-3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Novais, C., T. M. Coque, P. Boerlin, I. Herrero, M. A. Moreno, L. Dominguez, and L. Peixe. 2005. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clone in swine, Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1985-1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Poole, T. L., M. E. Hume, L. D. Campbell, H. M. Scott, W. Q. Alali, and R. B. Harvey. 2005. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from community wastewater from a semiclosed agri-food system in Texas. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4382-4385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rice, L. B., L. Carias, S. Rudin, C. Vael, H. Goossens, C. Konstabel, I. Klare, S. R. Nallapareddy, W. Huang, and B. E. Murray. 2003. A potential virulence gene, hylEfm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin. J. Infect. Dis. 187:508-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shankar, V., A. S. Baghdayan, M. M. Huycke, G. Lindahl, and M. S. Gilmore. 1999. Infection-derived Enterococcus faecalis strains are enriched in esp, a gene encoding a novel surface protein. Infect. Immun. 67:193-200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Simjee, S., D. G. White, D. D. Wagner, J. Meng, S. Qaiyumi, S. Zhao, and P. F. McDermott. 2002. Identification of vat(E) in Enterococcus faecalis isolates from retail poultry and its transferability to Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3823-3828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Simjee, S., D. G. White, P. F. McDermott, D. D. Wagner, M. J. Zervos, S. M. Donabedian, L. L. English, J. R. Hayes, and R. D. Walker. 2002. Characterization of Tn1546 in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolated from canine urinary tract infections: evidence of gene exchange between human and animal enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4659-4665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stobberingh, E., A. van den Bogaard, N. London, C. Driessen, J. Top, and R. Willems. 1999. Enterococci with glycopeptide resistance in turkeys, turkey farmers, and turkey slaughterers, and (sub)urban residents in the south of the Netherlands: evidence for transmission of vancomycin resistance from animals to humans? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2215-2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Teixeira, L. M., M. G. S. Carvalho, and R. R. Facklam. 2007. Enterococcus, p. 430-442. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  • 55.Reference deleted.
  • 56.van den Bogaard, A. E., L. B. Jensen, and E. E. Stobberingh. 1997. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in turkeys and farmers. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:1558-1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Van den Braak, N., A. van Belkum, M. van Keulen, J. Vliegenthart, H. A. Verbrugh, and H. P. Endtz. 1998. Molecular characterization of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from hospitalized patients and poultry products in the Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1927-1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vankerckhoven, V., T. Van Autgaerden, C. Vael, C. Lammens, S. Chapelle, R. Rossi, D. Jabes, and H. Goossens. 2004. Development of a multiplex PCR for the detection of asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl genes in enterococci and survey for virulence determinants among European hospital isolates of Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4473-4479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wegener, H. C., F. M. Aarestrup, L. B. Jensen, A. M. Hammerum, and F. Bager. 1999. Use of antimicrobial growth promoters in food animals and Enterococcus faecium resistance to therapeutic antimicrobial drugs in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:329-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Welton, L. A., L. A. Thal, M. B. Perri, S. M. Donabedian, J. McMahon, J. W. Chow, and M. J. Zervos. 1998. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkey flocks fed virginiamycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:705-708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Willems, R. J. L., J. Top, N. van den Braak, A. van Belkum, D. J. Mevius, G. Hendriks, M. van Santen-Verheuvel, and J. D. A. van Embden. 1999. Molecular diversity and evolutionary relationships of Tn1546-like elements in enterococci from humans and animals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:483-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Reference deleted.
  • 63.Willems, R. J. L., W. Homan, J. Top, M. van Santen-Verheuvel, D. Tribe, X. Manzioros, C. Gaillard, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, E. M. Mascini, E. van Kregten, J. D. A. van Embden, and M. J. M. Bonten. 2001. Variant esp gene as a marker of a distinct genetic lineage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium spreading in hospitals. Lancet 357:853-855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Willems, R. J. L., J. Top, M. van Santen, D. A. Robinson, T. M. Coque, F. Baquero, H. Grundmann, and M. J. M. Bonten. 2005. Global spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from distinct nosocomial genetic complex. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:821-828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Woodford, N., A. M. A. Adebiyi, M. F. I. Palepou, and B. D. Cookson. 1998. Diversity of VanA glycopeptide resistance elements in enterococci from humans and nonhuman sources. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:502-508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zirakzadeh, A., and R. Patel. 2006. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: colonization, infection, detection, and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 81:529-536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES