Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2010 Dec 3;193(3):785–786. doi: 10.1128/JB.01352-10

Genome Sequence of an Erwinia amylovora Strain with Pathogenicity Restricted to Rubus Plants

Rachel Powney 1,2,3,4,, Theo H M Smits 5,, Tim Sawbridge 6, Beatrice Frey 5, Jochen Blom 7, Jürg E Frey 5, Kim M Plummer 1,3, Steven V Beer 2, Joanne Luck 1,4, Brion Duffy 5,*, Brendan Rodoni 1,4
PMCID: PMC3021219  PMID: 21131493

Abstract

Here, we present the genome of a strain of Erwinia amylovora, the fire blight pathogen, with pathogenicity restricted to Rubus spp. Comparative genomics of ATCC BAA-2158 with E. amylovora strains from non-Rubus hosts identified significant genetic differences but support the inclusion of this strain within the species E. amylovora.


Erwinia amylovora is a Gram-negative enterobacterial phytopathogen that was first reported from the Northeastern United States in the late 1790s (2). Most strains of E. amylovora have broad-spectrum pathogenicity to plants of the Spiraeoideae subfamily (revised Maloideae), particularly commercial apple and pear and ornamental and amenity species that include members of the genera Sorbus, Crataegus, and Cotoneaster (2). However, a less common, genetically distinct group of E. amylovora strains with a host range restricted to Rubus species has also been described from North America (9, 13). Here, we report the first genome sequence of a Rubus-pathogenic E. amylovora strain, ATCC BAA-2158 (syn. Ea246, Bb-1, IL-5), isolated from thornless blackberry in Illinois (9).

This sequence augments genomic data from recently sequenced Spiraeoideae-pathogenic strains of E. amylovora ATCC 49946 (10) and CFBP 1430 (12) and genomes of the closely related Erwinia species E. pyrifoliae DSM 12163T (pathogen of Asian pear) (11), E. tasmaniensis Et1/99 (epiphyte of uncertain pathogenicity) (5), and the nonpathogenic E. billingiae Eb661 (4). Our objective was to facilitate comparative studies that may elucidate the host-range determinants and evolutionary origins of this important phytopathogenic bacterial species.

Whole-genome pyrosequencing (454 Life Sciences) from two independent runs (3/8 of a 454 Titanium run and one 454 GS Junior run) yielded 344,879 high-quality filtered reads with an average read length of 375 bp and 31-times genome coverage. A consensus assembly of 32 contigs was obtained by assembly with Newbler (454 Life Sciences), and in silico gap closure performed with Lasergene (DNAStar, Madison, WI). Assembly was confirmed by realigning reads against the consensus using NGen 2.0 (DNAStar).

The E. amylovora ATCC BAA-2158 genome contains a chromosome (3.81 Mb in 29 contigs with 53.6% G+C content) and three circular plasmids, pEA29 (28,138 bp with 50% G+C), pEAR5.2 (5,251 bp with 52.2% G+C), and pEAR4.3 (4,369 bp with 51.5% G+C). A total of 3,869 coding sequences (CDS) and putative functions of the encoding genes were automatically assigned to the genome using GenDB (8) with manual optimization (11, 12). Plasmid pEA29 shares 99% sequence identity (100% coverage) with previously described pEA29 plasmids in genotypically diverse strains of E. amylovora (6, 10, 12). Plasmids pEAR5.2 (6 CDS) and pEAR4.3 (4 CDS) are unique to strain ATCC BAA-2158 and share 88% and 89% sequence identity (57% and 53% coverage) with pEP5 of E. pyrifoliae DSM 12163T (11).

Genomic sequence comparison using EDGAR (1) revealed approximately 373 singletons from ATCC BAA-2158 that were absent or highly divergent in the genomes of Spiraeoideae-infecting strains CFPB 1430 and ATCC 49946 of E. amylovora (10, 12). However, genomic sequence comparison of ATCC BAA-2158 with these strains of E. amylovora and the closely related species E. pyrifoliae DSM 12163T (11), E. tasmaniensis Et1/99 (5), and E. billingiae Eb661 (4) corroborates other analyses (e.g., DNA-DNA hybridization and sequencing of housekeeping genes) that retain ATCC BAA-2158 within the species E. amylovora (3, 7).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The 29 contigs of the draft chromosome of E. amylovora strain ATCC BAA-2158 were deposited at EMBL under accession numbers FR719181 to FR719209, and the plasmids under accession numbers FR719212 (pEA29), FR719210 (pEAR4.3), and FR719211 (pEAR5.2).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Program, Horticulture Australia, a Special Grant provided by the USDA CSREES for research on fire blight in New York, the European Union ESF-FP7-KBBE Project Q-Detect (grant no. 245047), the Swiss Secretariat for Education and Research (SER no. C09.0029), and the Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture (BLW no. 08.02).

We thank Jean M. Bonasera (Cornell University) and F. Rezzonico (Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil ACW) for technical support.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 3 December 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blom, J., et al. 2009. EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinform. 10:154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonn, W. G., and T. van der Zwet. 2000. Distribution and economic importance of fire blight, p. 37-54. In J. L. Vanneste (ed.), Fire blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  • 3.Geider, K., et al. 2006. Erwinia tasmaniensis sp. nov., a non-phytopathogenic bacterium from apple and pear trees. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56:2937-2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kube, M., et al. 2010. Genome comparison of the epiphytic bacteria Erwinia billingiae and E. tasmaniensis with the pear pathogen E. pyrifoliae. BMC Genomics 11:393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kube, M., et al. 2008. The genome of Erwinia tasmaniensis strain Et1/99, a non-pathogenic bacterium in the genus Erwinia. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2211-2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McGhee, G. C., and A. L. Jones. 2000. Complete nucleotide sequence of ubiquitous plasmid pEA29 from Erwinia amylovora strain Ea88: gene organization and intraspecies variation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4897-4907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McGhee, G. C., et al. 2002. Relatedness of chromosomal and plasmid DNAs of Erwinia pyrifoliae and Erwinia amylovora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:6182-6192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meyer, F., et al. 2003. GenDB: an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2187-2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ries, S. M., and A. G. Otterbacher. 1977. Occurrence of fire blight on thornless blackberry in Illinois. Plant Dis. Rep. 61:232-235. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sebaihia, M., et al. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora strain ATCC 49946. J. Bacteriol. 192:2020-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smits, T. H. M., et al. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia pyrifoliae DSM 12163T and comparative genomic insights into plant pathogenicity. BMC Genomics 11:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smits, T. H. M., et al. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora CFBP 1430 and comparison to other Erwinia spp. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 23:384-393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Starr, M. P., C. Cardona, and D. Folsom. 1951. Bacterial fire blight of raspberry. Phytopathology 41:914-919. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES