Skip to main content
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition logoLink to The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
. 2010 Nov 24;93(2):253–260. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.002253

Plasma and dietary magnesium and risk of sudden cardiac death in women123

Stephanie E Chiuve, Ethan C Korngold, James L Januzzi Jr, Mary Lou Gantzer, Christine M Albert
PMCID: PMC3021423  PMID: 21106914

Abstract

Background: Magnesium has antiarrhythmic properties in cellular and experimental models; however, its relation to sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk is unclear.

Objective: We prospectively examined the association between magnesium, as measured in diet and plasma, and risk of SCD.

Design: The analysis was conducted within the Nurses’ Health Study. The association for magnesium intake was examined prospectively in 88,375 women who were free of disease in 1980. Information on magnesium intake, other nutrients, and lifestyle factors was updated every 2–4 y through questionnaires, and 505 cases of sudden or arrhythmic death were documented over 26 y of follow-up. For plasma magnesium, a nested case-control analysis including 99 SCD cases and 291 controls matched for age, ethnicity, smoking, and presence of cardiovascular disease was performed.

Results: After multivariable adjustment for confounders and potential intermediaries, the relative risk of SCD was significantly lower in women in the highest quartile compared with those in the lowest quartile of dietary (relative risk: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.91) and plasma (relative risk: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.60) magnesium. The linear inverse relation with SCD was strongest for plasma magnesium (P for trend = 0.003), in which each 0.25-mg/dL (1 SD) increment in plasma magnesium was associated with a 41% (95% CI: 15%, 58%) lower risk of SCD.

Conclusions: In this prospective cohort of women, higher plasma concentrations and dietary magnesium intakes were associated with lower risks of SCD. If the observed association is causal, interventions directed at increasing dietary or plasma magnesium might lower the risk of SCD.

INTRODUCTION

Sudden death from cardiac causes accounts for >50% of all coronary artery disease (CAD) deaths, with estimates ranging from 184,000 to 462,000 deaths annually (1). Most patients who suffer sudden cardiac death (SCD) are not at high risk on the basis of established criteria (2), and up to 55% of men and 68% of women have no clinically recognized heart disease before sudden death (3, 4). Therefore, low-cost primary preventive strategies are needed to markedly reduce the incidence of SCD in the general population (1).

Magnesium, an intracellular cation that is easily and routinely measured in blood, plays an important role in cardiac electrophysiology as an activator of sodium potassium ATPase (5). This channel regulates ion currents across cell membranes (6), thereby maintaining the cell's resting membrane potential, membrane stability, and excitability (5, 7). Evidence from experimental and animal models suggests that magnesium has antiarrhythmic properties (8, 9), whereas chronic magnesium deficiency may be proarrhythmic (10).

Prospective epidemiologic studies have reported variable associations between magnesium and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (1115). In general, relations were stronger for plasma than for dietary magnesium. Furthermore, the association between plasma magnesium and CAD risk appears stronger for fatal than for nonfatal events (11), which could be explained if magnesium was protective against fatal ventricular arrhythmias and thus SCD. This hypothesis is supported further by ecologic studies, which reported inverse associations between regional drinking water hardness and sudden death (16) and autopsy studies, which reported lower myocardial magnesium concentrations in victims of SCD as compared with trauma (17, 18). However, prospective data regarding the association between magnesium and SCD are sparse, with only one study reporting an inverse association between serum magnesium and SCD (19). Therefore, we prospectively examined the association between magnesium, both in the diet and plasma, and risk of SCD in women in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Study population

The NHS is a cohort study of 121,700 female nurses aged 30–55 y at baseline in 1976 (20). Detailed information on lifestyle habits, medical history, and newly diagnosed disease was updated biennially, and dietary information was collected by using a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in 1980, 1984, 1986, and every 4 y through 2002. Between 1989 and 1990, 32,826 women in this cohort provided a blood sample. Participants who provided blood samples were similar to those who did not (21). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the institutional review board at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Endpoint ascertainment and definitions

Details for the classification of SCD were described previously (4, 22). Briefly, cardiac deaths were considered sudden if the death or cardiac arrest occurred within 1 h of symptom onset, as documented by medical records or through reports from next of kin. Deaths were also classified as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic based on the definition of Hinkle and Thaler (23). We included arrhythmic deaths, even if symptoms lasted >1 h, and excluded nonarrhythmic deaths, even if symptoms lasted <1 h. Unwitnessed deaths or deaths that occurred during sleep and the participant was documented to be symptom free when last observed within the preceding 24 h were considered probable, if circumstances suggested that the death could have been arrhythmic. Results were not substantially different when we excluded these probable cases (data not shown).

Assessment of nutrients and lifestyle factors

For each food item on the FFQ, a commonly used portion size was specified, and participants were asked how often, on average, they had consumed that quantity over the past year. Average nutrient intake was calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each food by its nutrient content and then summing across all foods. Magnesium intake was the sum of magnesium from food and supplemental sources, including multivitamins and magnesium supplements. Nutrient values were obtained from the Harvard University Food Composition Database (24). All nutrients were adjusted for total energy intake by using the residual method (25). Information on anthropometric, lifestyle, and CVD risk factor status was ascertained from biennial questionnaires.

Measurement of biochemical variables

Blood samples were collected and stored in a liquid nitrogen freezer as previously described (26). Plasma magnesium was measured with the Siemens Dimension Vista 1500 System from Dade Behring (now Siemens Health Care Diagnostics Inc, Newark, DE) by using a modified methylthymol blue procedure (27). In addition, we measured triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as described previously (22). Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. The CV for plasma magnesium was 4%. The intraclass correlation for plasma magnesium from samples taken 1 y apart was 0.63.

Dietary magnesium data analysis

The association between magnesium intake and SCD was analyzed by using a prospective cohort design among women who returned the 1980 FFQ. Women with prior diagnosis of cancer or who had invalid dietary data (ie, left ≥10 food items blank or had implausible energy intake [<600 or >3500 kcal/d]) were excluded, leaving 88,375 women for analysis. Women with a history of prior CVD (angina, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or stroke) at baseline or who developed CVD during follow-up were not excluded from the primary analysis. Instead, we controlled for prior report of CVD in the analysis. Women contributed person-time in this analysis, from date of return of the 1980 questionnaire until the date of death or end of follow-up (1 June 2006), whichever came first.

We calculated the cumulative average of magnesium intake and other nutrients from repeated dietary assessments to reduce measurement error (28). Because we hypothesized that short-term intake would have the greatest influence on SCD risk, we gave more weight to the most recent diet. For example, magnesium intake from the 1984 FFQ was used to estimate SCD risk between 1984 and 1986, whereas an average of the 1984 and 1986 magnesium intake was used to predict SCD risk occurring between 1986 and 1990. To estimate disease risk between 1990 and 1994, we used the average of magnesium intake in 1984 and 1986 and magnesium intake in 1990 (28). In multivariable models, other covariates were updated at various time points; if data were missing at a given time point, the last observation was carried forward for 1 cycle.

The means and proportions of baseline characteristics and CVD risk factors across quartiles of magnesium intake were calculated for descriptive purposes only. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between magnesium intake and the risk of SCD, with adjustment for CVD risk factors and nutrients that may influence magnesium metabolism (potassium, calcium, and vitamin D) or were previously associated with risk of SCD [marine omega-3 (n−3) fatty acids], all in quartiles. In separate models, we furthered adjusted for intermediate endpoints, including diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, to address potential mechanistic pathways through which magnesium intake may influence risk of SCD. Further adjustment for cholesterol or blood pressure–lowering medication use did not alter the results (data not shown). To test for a linear trend, we assigned the median value of plasma magnesium to each quartile and modeled this variable as a continuous variable in separate regression models. We also examined the possibility of a nonlinear relation between magnesium intake and SCD risk nonparametrically by using restricted cubic spline transformations (29) and tested for nonlinearity by using the likelihood ratio test, comparing the model with the linear term with the model with the linear and the cubic spline terms combined.

In prespecified secondary analyses, we explored whether the relation between magnesium intake and SCD was modified by preexisting CAD (myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary revascularization). To test formally for interaction, we modeled the cross-product term between magnesium intake and CAD history and used a likelihood ratio test to compare models with and without the interaction term.

Plasma magnesium data analysis

To estimate the association between plasma magnesium and risk of SCD, we used a prospective nested case-control study in the 32,826 women who provided a blood sample between 1989 and 1990. From among these women, 99 cases of SCD occurred after return of the blood sample and before 1 June 2006. Using risk-set sampling (30), we randomly selected controls in a 3:1 ratio, matched to cases on age (±1 y), ethnicity, smoking status (current, never, or past), time and date of blood sampling, fasting status, and CVD before death. Matched case-control pairs were shipped to the laboratory in the same batch, and magnesium and other biochemical assays were performed in the same analytic run. The order of each case-control pair was random to keep the laboratory personnel blinded to case-control status.

We calculated the means and proportions of baseline characteristics, CVD risk factors, and biomarkers across quartiles of plasma magnesium concentration among the controls. We also compared the means and proportions of baseline characteristics in cases and controls and tested the significance of these associations using repeated-measures analysis of variance (Proc Mixed in SAS; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) for continuous variables and generalized estimating equations for categorical variables. Age-adjusted Spearman correlations were used to assess the association between plasma and dietary magnesium.

The association between plasma magnesium and the risk of SCD was assessed by using multivariable conditional logistic regression. With risk-set analysis, the odds ratio derived from the conditional logistic regression directly estimates the hazard ratio (30) and thus the relative risk (RR). The quartiles of plasma magnesium were created based on the distribution of plasma magnesium among the controls, and cases were assigned to the appropriate category. However, given the restricted range of values for plasma magnesium, the participants were not evenly distributed in each quartile. Tests for linear trend across quartiles and deviations from linearity were performed, as described above. Models were adjusted for various nutritional and other risk factors ascertained on the 1990 questionnaire (the year the blood samples were collected) and biomarkers associated with SCD (total:HDL cholesterol, glomerular filtration rate, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP). Further adjustment for blood pressure– and cholesterol-lowering medications, triglycerides, and uric acid did not alter the risk estimates (data not shown). Because thiazide diuretic use can alter plasma magnesium concentrations, we conducted a separate analysis excluding women who reported use of these medications at the time of blood draw. All analyzes were carried out by using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc).

RESULTS

Dietary magnesium analysis

The distribution of selected characteristics in 1980 in this population across quartiles of magnesium intake is detailed in Table 1. Women with a greater intake of magnesium tended to be older, to smoke, to have a slightly lower BMI, to exercise more, and to have a higher intake of potassium, calcium, vitamin D, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, and alcohol at baseline. Data on magnesium supplement use were first collected in 1984. Approximately 4% of the women reported taking a magnesium supplement, and the results were similar when these supplement users were excluded (data not shown).

TABLE 1.

Cardiovascular disease risk factors and selected nutrient intakes in 88,375 women in the Nurses’ Health Study in 1980 according to quartile (Q) of magnesium intake1

Magnesium intake (mg/d)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Range of magnesium (mg/d) <261 261–300 301–345 >345
Median magnesium (mg/d) 235 281 321 383
No. of subjects 30,071 21,415 19,182 17,707
Age (y) 46 ± 72 47 ± 7 47 ± 7 48 ± 7
Current smoker (%) 27 28 30 31
Parental history of MI (%) 13 12 13 14
History of hypertension (%) 18 16 15 16
History of diabetes (%) 2 2 2 3
History of high cholesterol (%) 5 5 6 7
BMI (kg/m2) 24.6 ± 4.8 24.3 ± 4.4 24.3 ± 4.2 24.3 ± 4.2
Physical activity (MET-h/wk) 3.6 ± 2.8 3.8 ± 2.9 4.0 ± 2.9 4.4 ± 2.9
Current use of postmenopausal hormones (%) 8 8 8 8
Current aspirin use >22 d/mo (%) 15 14 15 15
Current use of thiazide diuretics (%) 10 10 10 11
Nutrients
 Potassium (mg/d) 2209 ± 349 2690 ± 320 2996 ± 371 3488 ± 527
 Calcium (mg/d) 574 ± 236 717 ± 272 804 ± 308 940 ± 341
 Vitamin D ( IU/d) 274 ± 252 323 ± 279 354 ± 290 403 ± 322
 Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (% of total energy) 0.06 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.08 0.09 ± 0.07 0.11 ± 0.10
 Saturated fat (% of total energy) 16.7 ± 3.6 15.9 ± 3.3 15.2 ± 3.3 13.7 ± 3.4
 Fiber (g/d) 11.2 ± 3.6 13.2 ± 3.8 14.6 ± 4.3 17.5 ± 5.5
 Alcohol (g/d) 5.8 ± 10.6 6.4 ± 10.2 6.8 ± 10.7 6.8 ± 10.7
1

All nutrients, except alcohol, were energy adjusted. MI, myocardial infarction; MET-h, metabolic equivalent task hours.

2

Mean ± SD (all such values).

In this cohort, 505 cases of SCD (n = 295 definite, n = 210 probable) were identified over 26 y of follow-up. In the age-adjusted model, magnesium intake was inversely associated with SCD (P for trend = 0.003), and women in the highest quartile of magnesium intake had a significantly lower risk of SCD than did women in the lowest quartile (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.79) (Table 2). Further adjustment for CVD risk factors, diet, lifestyle, medication use (multivariable model 1), and potential intermediate diseases (multivariable model 2) did not appreciably alter this result (RR for the highest compared with the lowest quartile: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.95); however, the P for linear trend across quartiles became nonsignificant (P for trend = 0.09, multivariable model 2). The inverse association was significant in the second quartile of magnesium intake, with minimal change in the RRs at higher levels of consumption. Thus, in a post hoc analysis, we explored a potential threshold relation by comparing the risk of SCD in the top 3 quartiles with that in the lowest quartile. The RR in women in the top 3 quartiles, compared with quartile 1, for magnesium intake was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.93); however, no significant deviation from linearity was detected (P for deviation from linearity = 0.76) when cubic spline transformations were used. No significant interactions between magnesium intake and prior CAD diagnosis were found (P for interaction = 0.89).

TABLE 2.

Relative risk (95% CI) of sudden cardiac death by quartile (Q) of magnesium intake1

Magnesium intake (mg/d)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P for trend2
Median magnesium intake (mg/d) 235 281 321 383
No. of cases 124 96 146 139
Person-years 568,020 567,696 567,670 566,412
Age-adjusted model 1.0 (ref) 0.61 (0.47, 0.80) 0.81 (0.64, 1.03) 0.62 (0.48, 0.79) 0.003
Multivariate model 1 1.0 (ref) 0.63 (0.47, 0.86) 0.82 (0.60, 1.13) 0.63 (0.44, 0.91) 0.06
Multivariate model 2 1.0 (ref) 0.64 (0.47, 0.87) 0.85 (0.62, 1.17) 0.66 (0.46, 0.95) 0.09
1

ref, reference. Multivariate model 1 was a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age; history of cardiovascular disease (yes or no); total calories; smoking; BMI (in kg/m2; <25, 25–29.9, or ≥30); parental history of myocardial infarction before age 60 y (yes or no); alcohol intake (<0.1, 0.1–14.9, 15–29.9, or ≥30 g/d); physical activity (quintiles of metabolic equivalent task hours/wk); use of postmenopausal hormones, thiazide diuretics, and aspirin >22 d/mo (yes or no); and intakes of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid (% of energy), calcium (mg/d), potassium (mg/d), and vitamin D (IU/d) (all in quartiles). Multivariate model 2 was adjusted as for model 1 plus hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes.

2

P for linear trend estimated by assigning the median value of plasma magnesium in each quartile and modeling this as a continuous variable in Cox proportional hazards models.

Plasma magnesium analysis

Of the controls selected for the nested case-control analysis, women with higher plasma magnesium concentrations tended to have a lower prevalence of CVD, diabetes, and hypertension; were less likely to use aspirin, postmenopausal hormone therapy, and thiazide diuretics; and tended to have a lower concentration of hsCRP, a lower glomerular filtration rate, and higher concentrations of total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol (Table 3). Plasma magnesium was not significantly correlated with dietary magnesium (r = 0.07, P = 0.23) or associated with any other CVD risk factors or nutrients. As compared with controls, cases of SCD were more likely to have a parental history of MI, have a personal history of diabetes and/or hypertension, or use thiazide diuretics (Table 4). Plasma magnesium concentrations were lower in the cases than in the controls (P = 0.009).

TABLE 3.

Cardiovascular biomarkers and selected nutrient intakes in 1990 according to quartile (Q) of plasma magnesium in 291 controls in a nested case-control study in the Nurses’ Health Study1

Plasma magnesium (mg/dL)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Range of magnesium (mg/dL) <1.9 1.9–2.0 2.1–2.1 >2.1
Median magnesium (mg/dL) 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3
No. of subjects 54 86 56 95
Age (y) 61 ± 62 61 ± 6 61 ± 6 60 ± 6
Current smoker (%) 20 29 9 24
Parental history of MI (%) 17 28 16 15
History of hypertension (%) 55 43 51 38
History of diabetes (%) 15 12 1 5
History of cardiovascular disease (%) 48 46 34 37
BMI (kg/m2) 27.3 ± 5.6 26.0 ± 4.2 27.5 ± 5.2 25.8 ± 5.0
Physical activity (MET-h/wk) 18.0 ± 20.2 15.0 ± 15.6 20.3 ± 24.0 165.1 ± 18.7
Current use of postmenopausal hormones (%) 41 39 37 29
Current aspirin use >22 d/mo (%) 31 16 12 18
Current use of thiazide diuretics (%) 18 18 20 10
Current use of magnesium supplements (%) 7 3 1 1
Nutrients
 Magnesium (mg/d) 295 ± 65 303 ± 64 332 ± 85 307 ± 66.5
 Potassium (mg/d) 2884 ± 502 2924 ± 501 3023 ± 538 2922 ± 554
 Calcium (mg/d) 1024 ± 548 985 ± 439 971 ± 507 1040 ± 518
 Vitamin D (IU/d) 384 ± 251 384 ± 255 363 ± 253 362 ± 240
 Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (% of total energy) 0.15 ± 0.14 0.15 ± 0.13 0.18 ± 0.14 0.15 ± 0.15
 Alcohol (g/d) 8.0 ± 16 6.5 ± 14 5.9 ± 10.6 5.4 ± 9.8
Cardiovascular biomarkers
 Cholesterol (mg/dL)
 Total 212 ± 38 225 ± 35 234 ± 34.7 242 ± 47
 LDL 135 ± 39 148 ± 32 153 ± 29 162 ± 44
 HDL 64 ± 14 62 ± 14 66 ± 14 68 ± 17
 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 161 ± 109 161 ± 72 169 ± 102 154 ± 58
 C-reactive protein (mg/L) 6.6 ± 8.6 4.9 ± 4.9 4.7 ± 5.5 3.9 ± 4.6
 N-Terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (pg/mL) 128 ± 133 163 ± 327 135 ± 119 109 ± 122
 Glomerular filtration rate (mL ⋅ minminus1 ⋅ 1.73 mminus2) 117 ± 105 92 ± 21 96 ± 28 86 ± 23
1

All nutrients, except alcohol, were energy adjusted. MI, myocardial infarction; MET-h, metabolic equivalent task hours.

2

Mean ± SD (all such values).

TABLE 4.

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to case status1

Cases (n = 99) Controls (n = 291) P value2
Matching factors
 Age (y) 61 ± 63 61 ± 6 NA
 Current smoker (%) 23 23 NA
 History of cardiovascular disease (%) 40 40 NA
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
 Parental history of coronary disease (%) 28 19 0.06
 History of hypertension (%) 61 45 0.01
 History of diabetes (%) 21 8 <0.001
 BMI (kg/m2) 27.1 ± 5.4 26.4 ± 5.0 0.29
 Activity (MET-h/wk) 16.5 ± 18.9 16.6 ± 19.3 0.97
Drug therapy (%)
 Hormone therapy at blood draw 32 37 0.36
 Aspirin use >22 d/mo 25 18 0.10
 Thiazide diuretics 27 16 0.02
 Magnesium supplements 2 3 0.75
Nutrients
 Plasma magnesium (mg/dL) 2.0 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.3 0.009
 Magnesium intake (mg/d) 296 ± 65 308 ± 70 0.11
 Potassium intake (mg/d) 2956 ± 629 2934 ± 525 0.92
 Calcium intake (mg/d) 1023 ± 483 1007 ± 498 0.78
 Vitamin D intake (IU/d) 311 ± 208 373 ± 248 0.06
 Omega-3 fatty acid intake (% of energy) 0.13 ± 0.13 0.15 ± 0.14 0.29
 Alcohol (g/d) 6.5 ± 11.9 6.3 ± 12.7 0.92
1

MET-h, metabolic equivalent task hours; NA, not applicable.

2

P values were calculated by using repeated-measures linear regression models (Proc Mixed in SAS; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) for continuous variables and generalized estimating equations for categorical variables.

3

Mean ± SD (all such values).

After adjustment for matching factors, plasma magnesium concentrations were inversely associated with SCD (P for trend = 0.006). Women in the highest compared with the lowest quartile of plasma magnesium had a significantly lower risk of SCD (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.78) (Table 5), and no deviations from linearity in the relative risks was detected (P for deviation from linearity = 0.64). This association was strengthened after adjustment for CVD risk factors, thiazide diuretics, dietary nutrients, biomarkers, and potential intermediate diseases (multivariate model 4) (RR for the comparison of quartile 4 with quartile 1: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.60). When analyzed as a continuous variable, each 0.25-mg/dL (1-SD) increment in plasma magnesium was associated with an RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.85) after adjustment for CVD risk factors, nutrients, and biomarkers.

TABLE 5.

Relative risk (95% CI) of sudden cardiac death by quartile (Q) of plasma magnesium1

Plasma magnesium (mg/dL)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P for trend2
Range of magnesium (mg/dL) <1.9 1.9–2.0 2.1–2.1 >2.1
Cases/controls (n) 30/54 31/89 14/56 24/95
Median magnesium in cases (mg/dL) 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2
Median magnesium in controls (mg/dL) 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3
Multivariate model 1 1.0 (ref) 0.61 (0.33, 1.12) 0.42 (0.20, 0.90) 0.39 (0.20, 0.78) 0.006
Multivariate model 2 1.0 (ref) 0.47 (0.23, 0.95) 0.31 (0.13, 0.74) 0.23 (0.10, 0.53) 0.001
Multivariate model 3 1.0 (ref) 0.50 (0.23, 1.09) 0.33 (0.13, 0.86) 0.19 (0.08, 0.50) 0.001
Multivariate model 4 1.0 (ref) 0.56 (0.25, 1.25) 0.41 (0.15, 1.10) 0.23 (0.09, 0.60) 0.003
1

ref, reference. Multivariate model 1 was a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age and fasting. Multivariate model 2 was adjusted as for model 1 plus BMI (in kg/m2; <25, 25–29.9, or ≥30), parental history of myocardial infarction before age 60 y (yes or no), alcohol intake (<0.1, 0.1–14.9, 15–29.9, or ≥30 g/d), physical activity (quintiles of metabolic equivalent task hours/wk), postmenopausal hormone use, use of thiazide diuretics (yes or no), aspirin use >22 d/mo (yes or no), and intake of magnesium (mg/d), long-chain omega-3 (n−3) fatty acids (% of energy), calcium (mg/d), potassium (mg/d), and vitamin D (IU/d) (all in quartiles). Multivariate model 3 was adjusted as for model 2 plus total:HDL cholesterol, glomerular filtration rate, C-reactive protein, and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide. Multivariate model 4 was adjusted as for model 3 plus history of diabetes and hypertension.

2

Estimated by assigning the median value of plasma magnesium in each quartile and modeling this as a continuous variable in regression models.

This association remained significant in secondary analyses in which women who had developed CVD by the time of the blood draw were excluded (n = 30). The multivariate RR for the comparison of the highest with the lowest quartile of plasma magnesium was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.87). Additionally, the association between plasma magnesium and SCD remained significant among women who did not report thiazide diuretic use (RR for the comparison of extreme quartiles: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.70).

DISCUSSION

In this large prospective cohort of women, magnesium measured in diet and plasma was associated with a lower risk of SCD. Women in the highest compared with the lowest quartile of dietary and plasma magnesium had a 34% and 77% lower SCD risk, respectively. The relation was stronger for plasma magnesium, for which the inverse association appeared linear across the normal range of plasma magnesium, with a 41% lower risk of SCD with each 1-SD increase. The relatively consistent inverse association found between these 2 measures of magnesium and SCD risk is supportive of the hypothesis that magnesium might modify SCD risk.

Inverse associations between magnesium and total CAD have been reported previously in some, but not in all, prior prospective studies. Weak associations between dietary magnesium and CAD have been reported solely among men (1214), whereas serum magnesium was inversely associated with CAD only among women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (11), plasma magnesium was associated with fatal, but not with nonfatal ischemic heart disease events. One potential explanation for this latter finding was that magnesium may be associated more strongly with fatal arrhythmias and SCD than with the development of atherosclerosis.

Despite promising autopsy and ecologic data supporting a specific association with SCD (1618), to our knowledge, only one other study prospectively examined the association between magnesium and SCD. Similar to our findings, higher serum magnesium concentration was associated with a lower risk of SCD within the multiethnic ARIC population over 12 y of follow-up (19). In the ARIC Study, the corresponding RR of SCD for the comparison of the fourth to first quartiles of serum magnesium was less extreme (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.93). In further contrast with our data, dietary magnesium was not associated with SCD risk in the ARIC Study (19); however, repeated measures of dietary intake were not available, and the number of SCDs was smaller (n = 264) than in our dietary analysis.

In addition to these prospective studies, several lines of evidence support a specific antiarrhythmic action of magnesium. Extracellular magnesium influences cardiac ion channel properties (31) and regulates potassium homeostasis through activation of sodium potassium ATPase (5). Magnesium administration suppresses early after depolarizations and dispersion of repolarization (8, 9), whereas magnesium deficiency results in polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and SCD in animal models (10). In clinical studies, magnesium therapy is efficacious in the treatment of arrhythmias secondary to acquired torsades de pointes (32) or hypomagnesemia (33). Apart from antiarrhythmic actions, magnesium may also influence SCD risk through other pathways, including improvements in vascular tone, lipid metabolism, endothelial function, inflammation, blood pressure, diabetes, and inhibition of platelet function (3436).

As in previous studies (12, 37), plasma and dietary magnesium are not strongly correlated in this population. Plasma magnesium concentrations are under tight homeostatic regulation by a variety of mechanisms, most notably by renal excretion; therefore, plasma magnesium is a poor surrogate for magnesium intake. However, magnesium supplementation increases plasma (38) and intracellular (39) magnesium concentrations, particularly among patients with hypomagnesemia. Thus, magnesium intake may have a greater influence on plasma magnesium at more extreme intakes than seen in our population. Alternatively, a stronger correlation with diet may have been observed if intracellular magnesium concentrations had been measured.

If the observed association between magnesium and SCD risk is ultimately found to be causal through randomized trials, these findings would have important public health implications. The estimated magnesium intake from food sources in 2005–2006 was 261 mg in women and 347 mg in men (40), which is well below the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) (320 mg for women and 420 mg for men), and most Americans do not meet the RDA, even with the use of magnesium-containing supplements (41, 42). Therefore, increases in magnesium intake would likely require supplementation or fortification of water or food supplies. Such public health strategies may be effective in preventing SCD and other CVD outcomes associated with low magnesium intake. Although short-term administration of intravenous magnesium in the setting of acute myocardial infarction did not reduce the risk of cardiac arrest or mortality in a large-scale randomized trial (43), it is plausible that chronic long-term magnesium supplementation might still be beneficial in a more general population. We must emphasize that observational studies cannot establish causality and, ultimately, randomized controlled trials will be needed to definitively test this hypothesis.

Strengths of the present study include the prospective design, the large well-characterized cohort with repeated assessments of diet and long-term follow-up, and the large number of rigorously confirmed sudden and/or arrhythmic cardiac deaths—a difficult phenotype to classify in population studies. Potential study limitations also require discussion. First, the selective nature of the cohort, primarily white US female nurses, may limit the generalizability of the findings to other groups of women, ethnicities, or men. However, the good health status of this population also minimizes potential confounding due to preexisting comorbidities.

Second, although plasma magnesium is used routinely to assess magnesium status, <1% of magnesium circulates in the blood (44) and plasma magnesium may not be reflective of total body stores. However, if plasma magnesium is low, magnesium deficiency is usually present (44). Also, our analysis was based on a single baseline determination of plasma magnesium. Whereas our results remain strongly supportive of an association between magnesium and SCD risk, serial measurements or a measure of intracellular magnesium, such as that in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, or myocytes, may have provided a more precise assessment of the true relation. In addition, the FFQ does not capture magnesium intake from drinking water, which may account for 20–30% of a person's daily requirement (37, 45), and likely underestimates total magnesium intake. These sources of nondifferential misclassification should underestimate the strength of the relation between magnesium and SCD in our data.

Finally, as with any observational study, residual confounding by other factors could explain, in part, the association between magnesium and SCD. We do not have complete data on drug therapies, specifically during the early follow-up years, or direct clinical measurements of heart rate and blood pressure, and therefore could not control for these parameters in our models. However, control for a variety of other coronary risk factors, biomarkers, and nutrients in our models had little effect on the risk estimates. Furthermore, although we controlled for dietary potassium in our models, we did not measure and were unable to control for plasma potassium in our case-control analysis. However, plasma potassium did not confound or modify the association between plasma magnesium and SCD in the ARIC Study (19).

In summary, both plasma concentrations and dietary intake of magnesium are inversely associated with SCD risk in this large cohort of women. Because most individuals who die suddenly have no clinically recognized heart disease, prevention of SCD will require efforts to lower risk in the general population as well as in high-risk individuals. Given that most Americans do not meet the RDA for magnesium, increasing intake of magnesium presents a potential opportunity for SCD prevention in the general population. If further studies replicate these findings, this hypothesis may warrant testing in randomized trials.

Acknowledgments

Data for the NHS were collected by investigators at the Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—SEC, ECK, JLJ, and CMA: designed the research; MLG, CMA, and SEC: conducted the research; SEC: performed statistical analysis; and SEC and CMA: had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors wrote the manuscript and read and approved the manuscript as written. MLG is an employee of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. None of the other authors reported a conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Goldberger JJ, Cain ME, Hohnloser SH, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2008;118:1497–518 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chugh SS, Jui J, Gunson K, et al. Current burden of sudden cardiac death: multiple source surveillance versus retrospective death certificate-based review in a large U.S. community. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1268–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kannel WB, Schatzkin A. Sudden death: lessons from subsets in population studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:141B–9B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Albert CM, Chae CU, Grodstein F, et al. Prospective study of sudden cardiac death among women in the United States. Circulation 2003;107:2096–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, Lewenstam A. Magnesium: an update on physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. Clin Chim Acta 2000;294:1–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Skou JC, Butler KW, Hansen O. The effect of magnesium, ATP, P i, and sodium on the inhibition of the (Na + + K +)-activated enzyme system by g-strophanthin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1971;241:443–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tzivoni D, Keren A. Suppression of ventricular arrhythmias by magnesium. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:1397–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verduyn SC, Vos MA, van der Zande J, van der Hulst FF, Wellens HJ. Role of interventricular dispersion of repolarization in acquired torsade-de-pointes arrhythmias: reversal by magnesium. Cardiovasc Res 1997;34:453–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davidenko JM, Cohen L, Goodrow R, Antzelevitch C. Quinidine-induced action potential prolongation, early after depolarizations, and triggered activity in canine Purkinje fibers. Effects of stimulation rate, potassium, and magnesium. Circulation 1989;79:674–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fiset C, Kargacin ME, Kondo CS, Lester WM, Duff HJ. Hypomagnesemia: characterization of a model of sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1771–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ford ES. Serum magnesium and ischaemic heart disease: findings from a national sample of US adults. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:645–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liao F, Folsom AR, Brancati FL. Is low magnesium concentration a risk factor for coronary heart disease? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J 1998;136:480–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Al-Delaimy WK, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Magnesium intake and risk of coronary heart disease among men. J Am Coll Nutr 2004;23:63–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abbott RD, Ando F, Masaki KH, et al. Dietary magnesium intake and the future risk of coronary heart disease (the Honolulu Heart Program). Am J Cardiol 2003;92:665–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Song Y, Manson JE, Cook NR, Albert CM, Buring JE, Liu S. Dietary magnesium intake and risk of cardiovascular disease among women. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1135–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Anderson TW, Le Riche WH, MacKay JS. Sudden death and ischemic heart disease. Correlation with hardness of local water supply. N Engl J Med 1969;280:805–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chipperfield B, Chipperfield JR. Differences in metal content of the heart muscle in death from ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J 1978;95:732–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson CJ, Peterson DR, Smith EK. Myocardial tissue concentrations of magnesium and potassium in men dying suddenly from ischemic heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32:967–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peacock JM, Ohira T, Post W, Sotoodehnia N, Rosamond W, Folsom AR. Serum magnesium and risk of sudden cardiac death in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J 2010;160:464–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of parental history of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in women. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:48–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pai JK, Pischon T, Ma J, et al. Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2599–610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Korngold EC, Januzzi JL, Jr, Gantzer ML, Moorthy MV, Cook NR, Albert CM. Amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as predictors of sudden cardiac death among women. Circulation 2009;119:2868–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hinkle LE, Jr, Thaler HT. Clinical classification of cardiac deaths. Circulation 1982;65:457–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.US Department of Agriculture Composition of foods—raw, processed, and prepared. Agricultural handbook no. 8. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Offices, 1963 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Willett WC. Implications of total energy intake for epidemiologic analyses. Willett WC, Nutritional epidemiology. Chapter 10 New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, et al. Reproductive factors and family history of breast cancer in relation to plasma estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:217–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Connerty HV, Lau HS, Briggs AR. Spectrophotometric determination of magnesium by use of methylthymolblue. Clin Chem 1971;17:661 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, et al. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:531–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989;8:551–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prentice RL, Breslow NE. Retrospective studies and failure time models. Biometrika 1978;65:153–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Agus ZS, Morad M. Modulation of cardiac ion channels by magnesium. Annu Rev Physiol 1991;53:299–307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tzivoni D, Banai S, Schuger C, et al. Treatment of torsade de pointes with magnesium sulfate. Circulation 1988;77:392–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ceremuzynski L, Gebalska J, Wolk R, Makowska E. Hypomagnesemia in heart failure with ventricular arrhythmias. Beneficial effects of magnesium supplementation. J Intern Med 2000;247:78–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Peacock JM, Folsom AR, Arnett DK, Eckfeldt JH, Szklo M. Relationship of serum and dietary magnesium to incident hypertension: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9:159–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kao WH, Folsom AR, Nieto FJ, Mo JP, Watson RL, Brancati FL. Serum and dietary magnesium and the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2151–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shechter M. Magnesium and cardiovascular system. Magnes Res 2010;23:60–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma J, Folsom AR, Melnick SL, et al. Associations of serum and dietary magnesium with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, insulin, and carotid arterial wall thickness: the ARIC study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:927–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guerrero-Romero F, Tamez-Perez HE, Gonzalez-Gonzalez G, et al. Oral magnesium supplementation improves insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Diabetes Metab 2004;30:253–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pokan R, Hofmann P, von Duvillard SP, et al. Oral magnesium therapy, exercise heart rate, exercise tolerance, and myocardial function in coronary artery disease patients. Br J Sports Med 2006;40:773–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moshfegh A, Golman J, Auhja J, Rhodes D, Lacomb R. What we eat in America, NHANES 2005-2006: usual intakes from food and water compared to 1997 Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus and magnesium. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burnett-Hartman AN, Fitzpatrick AL, Gao K, Jackson SA, Schreiner PJ. Supplement use contributes to meeting recommended dietary intakes for calcium, magnesium, and vitamin C in four ethnicities of middle-aged and older Americans: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109:422–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.King DE, Mainous AG, III, Geesey ME, Woolson RF. Dietary magnesium and C-reactive protein levels. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24:166–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.ISIS-4 Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995;345:669–85 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eisenberg MJ. Magnesium deficiency and sudden death. Am Heart J 1992;124:544–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rubenowitz E, Axelsson G, Rylander R. Magnesium and calcium in drinking water and death from acute myocardial infarction in women. Epidemiology 1999;10:31–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES