Abstract
MRI has become an important tool to noninvasively assess global and regional cardiac function, infarct size, or myocardial blood flow in surgically or genetically modified mouse models of human heart disease. Constraints on scan time due to sensitivity to general anesthesia in hemodynamically compromised mice frequently limit the number of parameters available in one imaging session. Parallel imaging techniques to reduce acquisition times require coil arrays, which are technically challenging to design at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths. This work validates the use of an eight-channel volume phased-array coil for cardiac MRI in mice at 9.4 T. Two- and three-dimensional sequences were combined with parallel imaging techniques and used to quantify global cardiac function, T1-relaxation times and infarct sizes. Furthermore, the rapid acquisition of functional cine-data allowed for the first time in mice measurement of left-ventricular peak filling and ejection rates under intravenous infusion of dobutamine. The results demonstrate that a threefold accelerated data acquisition is generally feasible without compromising the accuracy of the results. This strategy may eventually pave the way for routine, multiparametric phenotyping of mouse hearts in vivo within one imaging session of tolerable duration. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Keywords: MRI, phased array, mouse hearts, cardiac function, infarct size, T1-relaxation times
Genetically and surgically modified mice are widely used as models for human cardiac disease. MRI has become a routine tool in many research laboratories to noninvasively assess ventricular volumes and mass in order to characterize global cardiac function in these animal models. Analogous to the human heart, MRI can also be used in murine hearts to assess regional and transmural wall motion (1,2), strain (3,4), perfusion (5,6), and infarct size (7,8). Because of the miniature size of murine hearts (∼100 mg) and heart rates of 400–600 beats per minute (bpm) observed even in anesthetized mice, an optimized set up including radio frequency (RF) coils is essential to achieve maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and to obtain sufficient spatial and temporal resolution. Cardiac MR (CMR) exams in mice are typically performed at ultrahigh magnetic fields ≥ 7 T, using surface- (9–11), volume-type (12–14) RF coils, or a combination of both (6,15). However, dedicated coil arrays consisting of multiple smaller but more sensitive receive coils can provide superior SNR performance compared to volume coils with matching inner diameters. The gain in SNR may be used to improve spatial and/or temporal resolution or to decrease the number of averages required (and therefore scan-time) in an MR scan. Where SNR is sufficient in nonaveraged experiments, accelerated acquisition methods (“parallel imaging”) such as SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) (16) or GRAPPA (17) may be employed to reduce the scan time further. We have recently shown that it is feasible to complete an exam of global cardiac function in rats at 9.4 T using a four-element array and TGRAPPA (18) within less than 3 min without impaired spatial and temporal resolution (19). Importantly, the accuracy of cardiac functional parameters obtained from these data was maintained using a fourfold accelerated acquisition compared with the unaccelerated case (19). Compared to rat CMR, murine experiments are performed with RF coils of much smaller inner diameter. Smaller geometries represent substantial technical challenges for designing efficient, mutually decoupled coil arrays at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths, and only very few studies have reported on the use of two- to three-element arrays for murine cardiac applications so far (20–22).
We have designed and characterized an eight-channel volume receive array integrated into a linear driven volume transmit birdcage resonator (23). Following the evaluation of the array's SNR performance and its comparison to a quadrature-driven birdcage transmit/receive resonator with identical inner diameter, we hypothesized that the gain in SNR close to the coil array would facilitate accelerated cardiac MRI in mice. The use of (two-element) coil arrays and the feasibility of parallel imaging in cine-mode only has been reported for mouse hearts in vivo so far (22,24), a systematic validation, however, of this technique and combination with other CMR protocols is still lacking. The aim of this study therefore was to investigate the benefits of the eight-channel coil array for murine CMR by combining parallel imaging with global cardiac function imaging (TGRAPPA), with in vivo relaxometry and with contrast-enhanced, high-resolution anatomical imaging in three-dimensional (3D) to measure infarct size. We show that an acceleration factor of 3 is generally achievable without compromising measurement accuracy. Furthermore, the benefit of accelerated imaging in mice is demonstrated using stress cine MRI as it allowed for the first time full heart coverage under intravenous infusion of dobutamine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RF Coils
For our experiments we used a volumetric coil array consisting of eight elements (id 35 mm, length 32.5 mm) arranged inside a linearly driven volume coil (id 67 mm, length 82 mm/od 115 mm) (see Ref. 23 for details). Comparative experiments were performed using a quadrature driven birdcage coil (id 35 mm, length 35 mm), optimized in geometry and loading for cardiac MR in mice. The maximum possible sample size was 33 mm in both cases.
MR System
Imaging experiments were carried out on a 9.4 T (400 MHz) MR system (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, USA) comprising a horizontal magnet (bore size 210 mm), a VNMRS Direct Drive™ console and two actively shielded gradient systems (600 mT/m, rise time 180 μsec, od 205 mm, id 120 mm used with the eight-channel array; 1000 mT/m, rise time 130 μsec, od 115 mm, id 60 mm, used for the quadrature-driven birdcage resonator).
Animal Preparation
C57BL/6 mice were obtained from a commercial breeder (Harlan, UK) at least 1 week prior to the first imaging time point to allow naturalization to new surroundings. The mice were kept under controlled conditions for temperature, humidity and light, with chow and water available ad libitum. Anesthesia was induced in an anesthetic chamber using 4% isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Animals were then positioned prone on dedicated mouse cradles and maintained at 1.5–2% isoflurane at 2 L/min oxygen flow throughout the MRI experiments. Temperature was maintained at ∼37°C using a warm air blanket placed on the front or back of the animal. Cardiac and respiratory signals were continuously monitored using an in-house developed electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiratory gating device (25).
All investigations conformed to Home Office Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and to institutional guidelines.
Global Cardiac Functional Imaging
MRI
Five male mice were subjected to cine MRI longitudinally at three sequential time-points (TP) over a period of ∼3 months during which body weight (BW) ranged from 17.1–28.5 g (TP1: 18.3 ± 0.9 g; TP2: 22.8 ± 0.9 g; TP3: 26.9 ± 1.0 g; mean ± SD). These scans were performed to study the effect of increasing coil loading on the coil (array) performance. Each TP consisted of two imaging days, with cardiac functional imaging using the eight-channel array on day 1 and the quadrature birdcage coil on day 2, respectively. After positioning the mice in the magnet with the heart in the centre, and scouting for long- and short-axis orientation of the heart using a cardiac triggered and respiratory gated, segmented gradient-echo sequence, shimming and pulse calibration were performed automatically prior to each experiment. Eight contiguous cine slices (slice thickness slth = 1 mm) were then acquired in short-axis orientation covering the entire heart. The imaging parameters were: field of view (25.6 mm)2, matrix size 256 × 256, echo time/pulse repetition time = 1.7/4.6 msec, 15° sinc excitation pulse, number of averages [i.e. number of transients (NT)] = 1 (coil array)/NT = 2 (birdcage coil). The sequence in both cases was ECG-triggered and respiratory gated with steady-state maintenance during respiration (25). The number of frames per cardiac cycle was determined by the heart rate and the number of phase-encoding (PE) steps per respiration cycle—acquired in a segmented fashion (14)—and were adapted to the respective respiratory rate. Additionally, an unaveraged dataset of a midventricular slice was acquired in case of the birdcage coil. For noise-correlation and SNR measurements, identical datasets with the excitation pulse turned off were acquired at the end of the experiment for both birdcage coil and eight-channel array. The total experimental time was approximately ∼40 min for the eight channels and ∼60 min for the birdcage coil, including experimental preparation.
Data Analysis
Data reconstruction and analysis were performed off-line using purpose-written idl-software (ITT, Boulder, USA) as described previously (19). In brief, in addition to the birdcage-coil and the phased-array (eight coils combined) datasets, twofold and threefold accelerated datasets (R = 2, 3) were generated in postprocessing from the phased-array data, followed by TGRAPPA and sum-of-square reconstruction, resulting in four datasets per mouse. All raw data were isotropically zerofilled by a factor of two and filtered [modified third order Butterworth filter (26)] prior to Fourier transformation resulting in an in-plane voxel size of 50 × 50 μm2 (experimental resolution: 100 × 100 μm2). For each dataset, cardiac structural [i.e., left ventricular mass (LVM); end diastolic volume (EDV); end systolic volume (ESV)] and functional parameters were determined by a single operator (LAS), blinded to animal ID and acquisition/reconstruction scheme, as described before (14), using Amira 4.1 (Visage Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Intraobserver variability was determined as a measure of reproducibility for volume and TGRAPPA, R = 3 datasets by blinded reanalysis. R = 4 datasets were generated identically for display purposes only.
SNR measurements were performed for birdcage coil and eight-channel array (for acceleration factors R = 1–3) on the fourth frame (corresponding to early systole) of a midventricular short-axis slice using a bootstrap method (27,28) as described in (19). In the unaccelerated, phased-array datasets, SNR was additionally calculated as a function of the number of contributing coils.
Stress-Cine MRI
Stress-cine MRI was performed in three female mice (28.2 ± 1.9 g) using a threefold accelerated TGRAPPA sequence (R = 3) as described above with a matrix size of 128 × 128, applied over two cardiac cycles. Following a baseline scan, dobutamine was infused intravenously via the tail vein at a rate of 27.8 μL/(g·h). Cine MRI commenced ∼7 min after start of infusion, which is the maximal time to achieve steady state in this strain (29). Left-ventricular volumes of all frames were assessed semi-automatically as before. Time–volume curves, normalized to the EDV, of baseline and stress scans were subjected to a Fourier analysis (30,31) using four harmonics to obtain maximum rates of volume change as a measure of contraction and relaxation i.e., (dV/dt)min/max·EDV−1.
T1 Mapping
T1 mapping was performed in three female C57Bl/6 mice (33 ± 5 g) as described previously (8,14). In brief, a cardiac gated, segmented SNAPSHOT–FLASH inversion recovery sequence (matrix size = 128 × 128 mm2, field of view = 30 × 30 mm2, slth = 1 mm, eight PE-steps per segment, echo time/pulse repetition time = 1.6/3.3 msec, pulse repetition time (seg) = 120–150 msec—depending on cardiac cycle length), acceleration factors R = 1, 2, 3, and 4 was applied in short-axis orientation. Twenty to thirty images on the inversion curve were used to map T1. Undersampled datasets were subjected to GRAPPA reconstruction using 24 autocalibration (ACS) lines acquired without inversion pulse. The inversion times, which depended on the heart rate, were logged during the experiment and the mean inversion time for each image on the inversion curve was calculated.
Infarct Size Measurement
A cardiac triggered and respiratory gated 3D-gradient-echo sequence with T1-weighting and steady-state maintenance was applied in three male mice (29.3 ± 2.1 g) 1 day post myocardial infarction as reported previously (8) [sequence parameters: matrix size = 256 × 192 × 32, field of view = 30 × 30 × 16 mm3, slab thickness 12 mm, PE/seg = 8, echo time/pulse repetition time = 2.0/3.9 ms, pulse repetition time (seg) ∼700 msec, NT = 1, flip-angle = 15°, inversion time individually adjusted in multiples of cardiac cycle lengths (400–420 ms)]. After an intraperitoneal bolus injection of 0.5 μmol/g Omniscan® (Gadodiamide, GE Healthcare/Amersham—total injection volume: 100 μL), the mice were placed in the scanner. Following scouting, shimming and pulse calibration, an ACS dataset (matrix size = 256 × 32 × 16, same imaging parameters otherwise) was acquired. High-resolution infarct imaging started 18 ± 9 min post injection with undersampling factors R = 1–4 (applied in random order) in the first phase-encoding direction. The undersampled data were subjected to GRAPPA reconstruction (32). Infarct sizes were measured by a single operator in all datasets (SB—blinded to animal ID and acquisition/reconstruction scheme).
Statistical Analysis
Agreement in LV mass, EDV, ESV, and EF between the birdcage coil and accelerated and unaccelerated eight-channel array datasets was statistically assessed using ANOVA for repeated measures in IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics Inc., Portland, USA). Agreement in T1 values and in infarct sizes between the accelerated and unaccelerated datasets was similarly assessed. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Figure 1a–h shows axial, end-diastolic cardiac triggered and respiratory gated gradient echo images of a mouse heart in vivo, obtained from the individual coil elements of the array (one average). The sum-of-squares reconstructions for the axial and the sagittal view are depicted in panels 1i and 1k, illustrating excellent sensitivity in covering the entire heart in each direction. The scale bar corresponds to 5 mm. The anterior coil elements (Fig. 1b–f) contribute most to the signal in the heart region due to the off-center position of the mouse heart as indicated schematically in panel 1j.
Cine imaging was performed longitudinally in order to study the effect of increasing coil loading on the coil (array) performance. Only small changes in body weight between day 1 and day 2 were noted for all imaging time points (ΔBWTP1 = −0.5 ± 0.1 g; ΔBWTP2 = 0.1 ± 0.3 g; ΔBWTP3 = 0.6 ± 0.3 g—day 1 − day 2; mean ± SD), which were significant for TP1 and TP3 (P < 0.01 each). Hence, the loading was equivalent for both coils for each time point. Midventricular end-diastolic (top row) and end-systolic frames (bottom row) in short-axis orientation are shown in Fig. 2 for TP3. The data were acquired with the quadrature birdcage coil—one (Fig. 2a, a′) or two (Fig. 2b, b′) averages and with the coil array—sum-of-square reconstruction, one average (Fig. 2c, c′). From the dataset acquired for Fig. 2c, c′, undersampled datasets with (2d, d′) R = 2, (2e, e′) R = 3 and (Fig. 2f, f′) R = 4 were generated, followed by a TGRAPPA reconstruction. The examples shown have been cropped for display purposes, and reflect image quality routinely obtained at all three time points. The two-fold accelerated data (Fig. 2d, d′) show an approximately equivalent image quality compared with the volume coil data, acquired without averaging (Fig. 2a, a′). Epicardial and endocardial border can still be identified in the threefold undersampled images (Fig. 2e, e′).
To determine the relative contribution of each coil element to improving SNR, the mean SNR as measured in the anterior and the posterior wall is plotted as a function of the number of contributing coil elements (nonaccelerated, sum-of-square reconstruction) in Fig. 3 for TP3. Although the main contribution arose from the three anterior coil elements for both compartments, all eight coil elements increase the SNR. Specifically, an SNR increase (calculated as (SNR(n+1) – SNRn)/SNRn × 100%; n is the number of contributing coils) of 30% and 15% was observed for the region of interest (ROI) in the anterior LV wall when combing the signal of two or three anterior located coil elements (for the ROI in the posterior wall, the corresponding increase was 42% and 20%, respectively). The two lateral elements increase the SNR in the posterior wall by 11% (four contributing coils in total) and by 9% (five coils in total), whereas the SNR in the anterior wall is only improved by 7% and 4%. The posterior coil elements add another ∼5% to the posterior ROI and ∼4% to the anterior ROI. Similar findings were obtained for the other two time points (data not shown).
The mean SNR based on location of compartment, coil/acquisition scheme was compared longitudinally under a range of loading conditions. Fig. 4a–c shows bar plots of the mean SNR obtained in the five compartments for each acquisition/reconstruction scheme at each time point. While the quadrature birdcage provided a reasonably homogeneous SNR over the myocardium of the left ventricle, in all data acquired with the coil array, the SNR in the anterior wall was highest and was lowest in the posterior wall as expected. Importantly, the array provides substantially improved SNR performance compared with the quadrature birdcage in all compartments, except for LV blood. The increase in bodyweight between TP1 and TP3 lead to a greater reduction in SNR for the birdcage coil (one average; −26 ± 5%) compared with the array (−10 ± 4%, i.e., 2.6-fold difference between the quadrature birdcage and the array). The ratio of SNR in lateral wall and septal wall combined for quadrature birdcage coil (two averages) to array (one average) was 0.90 ± 0.26 at TP1, 0.78 ± 0.36 at TP2, and 0.76 ± 0.25 at TP3, respectively. The mean g-factor, calculated for the GRAPPA reconstruction according to (33), in the cardiac region, averaged over all mice and time points was for R = 2 – ḡ = 1.11 ± 0.15 and for R = 3 – ḡ = 1.50 ± 0.36, respectively. The average noise correlation between coils ranged between 10% (TP1) and 12% (TP3) (overall mean—11 ± 8%; min—1%; max—29%).
Cardiac functional parameters and LV mass measurements obtained by a single blinded observer for TP3 are summarized in Table 1. There was no statistically significant difference between measurements for any of the functional parameters. Quantitative analysis was highly reproducible with low variability (overall intraobserver variability 6 ± 6% for both, birdcage coil and TGRAPPA, R = 3 datasets; intervariability assessed in three randomly selected datasets: 4.5 ± 3.2 %). Bland-Altman plots for LV mass, EDV, ESV and EF obtained from the birdcage coil compared with threefold accelerated data are shown in Fig. 5a–d. While all data points were contained within the ±2 SD range, there was a positive bias for LV mass (5.2 mg), EDV (4.7 μL) and for ESV (4.6 μL) indicating that volumes measured from the birdcage coil data were larger than those obtained from the TGRAPPA, R = 3 datasets. There was a small negative bias for EF (−3.8%).
Table 1.
Birdcage coil | Phased array | TGRAPPA, R = 2 | TGRAPPA, R = 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
n | 5 | 5 | ||
Body weight (g) | 27.2 ± 0.9 | 26.6 ± 1.0 | ||
HR (bpm) | 445 ± 27 | 458 ± 40 | ||
LV mass (g) | 107.4 ± 9.8 | 100.5 ± 6.0 | 100.9 ± 5.6 | 102.2 ± 5.4 |
EDV (μL) | 68.8 ± 6.0 | 66.7 ± 3.9 | 66.4 ± 5.5 | 64.2 ± 3.5 |
ESV (μL) | 30.0 ± 3.7 | 27.2 ± 2.4 | 28.5 ± 1.9 | 25.3 ± 3.3 |
SV (μL) | 38.9 ± 3.5 | 39.6 ± 4.5 | 37.8 ± 5.1 | 38.8 ± 5.4 |
EF (%) | 57 ± 3 | 59 ± 4 | 57 ± 4 | 60 ± 6 |
CO (mL/min) | 17.3 ± 2.3 | 18.0 ± 1.8 | 17.3 ± 2.2 | 17.8 ± 3.0 |
In a test application for accelerated cine imaging, time–volume curves were obtained from the whole ventricle during the experiment using TGRAPPA, R = 3 under baseline conditions and under intravenous dobutamine infusion (Fig. 6). The increase in heart rate (corresponding to a reduction of the RR-interval length) and the change in contractility [i.e., (dV/dt)min/max·EDV−1] are evident. More specifically, an increase in heart rate of 11 ± 2% was observed under dobutamine infusion. The maximum rate of volume change (dV/dt)max·EDV−1 as a measure of relaxation increased from 20.3 × 103 ± 5.3 × 103 s−1 to 22.8 × 103 ± 4.1 × 103 s−1, whereas the minimum rate of volume change (dV/dt)min·EDV−1 as a measure of contraction decreased from −(14.5 ± 1.7) × 103 s−1 to −(17.4 ± 1.7) × 103 s−1 (n = 3, mean ± SD, P = 0.2 and 0.06, respectively). Interestingly, determining the contractility parameters in the same way from a single midventricular slice only showed no difference for (dV/dt)max·EDV−1, while (dV/dt)min·EDV−1 was significantly different to the values determined for the whole heart (P < 0.05).
To determine whether T1-mapping and T1-weighted imaging could also be accelerated, parallel imaging was combined with the respective method in two dimension (2D) or 3D. Representative T1-parameter maps for acceleration factors R = 1–4 are shown in Fig. 7a–d. The T1 maps were masked in the range 0–3 sec to remove outliers from the fitting procedure. No significant difference in the parameter maps can be seen up to R = 3, while the increased noise levels and g-factors in the fourfold undersampled inversion recovery data impact on the fit accuracy (Fig. 7d). Quantitative results of the accelerated and non-accelerated T1-relaxation time measurements obtained from ROIs placed in liver, skeletal muscle of the chest wall, and left ventricular myocardium (at least 100 pixels per ROI) are listed in Table 2. The ANOVA test revealed no statistically significant difference between the different T1 values for each tissue type.
Table 2.
T1 (s) | R = 1 | R = 2 | R = 3 | R = 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
LV Myocardium | 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 1.05 ± 0.19 |
Skeletal Muscle | 1.34 ± 0.10 | 1.41 ± 0.09 | 1.38 ± 0.12 | 1.48 ± 0.18 |
Liver | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 0.98 ± 0.09 | 1.06 ± 0.16 |
Midventricular sections out of a 3D slab following intraperitoneal injection of Gd are shown in Fig. 8 for acceleration factors R = 1–3. The required scan times (also depending on the ratio heart to respiratory rate) were: R = 1: 1189 ± 85 sec; R = 2: 626 ± 44 sec; R = 3: 401 ± 47 sec; and R = 4: 317 ± 40 sec, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the left ventricular volumes, infarct volumes and infarct sizes for the individual mice obtained by blinded analysis. It can be seen that the infarct volumes and, therefore, the infarct sizes decreased significantly with increasing acceleration factors (P < 0.01 and P = 0.027, respectively), while the left ventricular volumes remained constant (P = 0.73).
Table 3.
LV volumes in μL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Infarct volumes in μL | ||||
Infarct sizes (IS) | R = 1 | R = 2 | R = 3 | R = 4 |
Mouse 1 | 79.8 | 81.0 | 84.9 | 86.3 |
38.9 | 32.4 | 31.8 | 30.8 | |
48.8% | 40.0% | 37.5% | 35.7% | |
Mouse 2 | 75.6 | 76.7 | 77.5 | 75.7 |
40.0 | 40.5 | 34.6 | 30.6 | |
52.9% | 52.7% | 44.6% | 40.5% | |
Mouse 3 | 78.1 | 75.4 | 77.6 | 67.0 |
35.3 | 32.8 | 31.1 | 28.1 | |
45.2% | 43.5% | 40.1% | 42.0% | |
Mean IS ± SD | 49.0 ± 3.8% | 45.4 ± 6.6% | 40.8 ± 3.6% | 39.4 ± 3.3% |
DISCUSSION
The aim of this article was to establish and validate a phased-array setup for cardiac MRI in mice at ultrahigh magnetic fields (i.e., 9.4 T). We used an eight-channel array designed to fit mice with a body weight range of approximately 20–35 g, and compared the phased array to a quadrature driven birdcage coil with a matching inner diameter that has been optimized and is routinely used in various laboratories for cardiac mouse MR. While the coil setup has been characterized in detail previously (23), the applicability for CMR needed to be determined. As is typical for the concept of a transmit body coil combined with a receive array, the transmit efficiency of the volume transmit coil is low compared with a quadrature Tx/Rx birdcage, due to the very low filling factor of the Tx resonator and the missing quadrature polarization. The inversion recovery experiments required a six times longer inversion pulse at the same power level than for the quadrature birdcage in order to completely invert the spins. Furthermore, the longitudinal homogeneity of the volume transmit coil is affected by the presence of the receive array, which shields the sample against the Tx amplitude of (excitation) radiofrequency field. This causes some amplitude of (excitation) radiofrequency field inhomogeneity in long-axis of the coil, and can impact on the automated RF pulse calibration, which was performed over an axial, 10-mm-thick slice containing the entire heart at the beginning of each experiment. The reduced SNR in the blood-pool of the LV for the array compared to the birdcage coil is due to a lower flip angle and therefore reduced inflow effect. The flip angle miscalibration will also inevitably affect the quantitative SNR measurements (Fig. 4), which were estimated to be in the order of 10% lower for LV myocardium and ∼50–60% lower for LV blood. Therefore, while the main conclusion of our validations remains unaffected, the comparison between array and birdcage may be even more favorable toward for the eight-channel array than observed in our studies.
In agreement with our previous work (23), we observed in our longitudinal cine study 2.6-fold larger SNR-reduction for the birdcage coil than for the array with an increase in mouse body weight of ∼10 g (Fig. 4a,c). Furthermore, the coupling between the individual coil elements as assessed quantitatively by the noise correlation matrix was only minimally affected by body weight. On the other hand, the array is substantially more sensitive in close vicinity of the coil elements. To utilize this effect, we placed the mouse slightly rotated in a dedicated animal cradle consisting only of a foil at the body region off-centered in the magnet. The SNR in the heart region is therefore dominated by the three anterior coil elements. Nevertheless, all eight coils are contributing constructively to the SNR in the heart and benefitted particularly the posterior wall of the left ventricle (Fig. 3).
The most important advantage of the array over the birdcage coil is the parallel imaging capability, which provides a significant reduction of scan time. Three different techniques were investigated in this context, i.e., cardiac functional imaging, T1-mapping and contrast-enhanced infarct MRI.
Similar to our previous study in rats (19), we used TGRAPPA (18) to investigate how accelerated cardiac MR impacted on the accuracy of cardiac functional and structural parameters. All datasets were therefore analysed blinded by a single operator as this technique is well established in our laboratory and our analysts are interchangeable. The use of a matching (birdcage) coil for comparison required experiments to be conducted on two (successive) days. To minimize any effect of the experimental procedure in general, the scans with the eight-channel array were always conducted on day one due to the shorter protocol. LV mass, EDV, and ESV were obtained for all acquisition/reconstruction schemes with high accuracy (Fig. 5 and Table 1). The small bias in ventricular volumes and mass, which is still within the physiological variability, is likely caused by the signal averaging of the volume coil data. Validation experiments on a phantom with known volume showed a difference of <2% between both coils, which is within the accuracy of image segmentation. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that (minor) differences in gradient scaling and/or physiological setup contributed to the found bias. Only differences within the reproducibility of the segmentation were found when comparing phased-array data without (R = 1) and with threefold acceleration (data not shown). There was no difference in parameter variability between high- and low-SNR datasets, importantly despite the decrease in SNR with increasing acceleration factors. In particular, the overall intraobserver variability and interobserver variability for both volume and array coil data were in the same range as previously published values (12,14). In agreement with our previous work, this demonstrates that even relatively low-SNR data are sufficient to accurately determine cardiac functional parameters in mice, and that sacrifice of SNR for parallel imaging is an acceptable trade-off to reduce the acquisition time (19).
One application facilitated by the combination of parallel imaging with cine MRI is pharmacological stress testing, e.g., by dobutamine infusion, and the assessment of LV volumes and maximum rates of volume change using whole ventricular coverage. LV volumes of the entire ventricle following intraperitoneal bolus injection of dobutamine have been quantified before (34), contractile parameters, however, are only typically obtained from a single midventricular slice in short-axis orientation (34,35). As with contrast-enhanced applications (see for example, Ref. 8), intravenous administration has the advantage over intraperitoneal injections of achieving a rapid steady-state response, which is independent of absorption rates. This is particularly the case for dobutamine, which is very rapidly metabolized. In the mouse, the duration of intravenous infusions is limited by small administrative volumes. More specifically, given the small blood volume of a mouse of ∼2 mL, the maximum intravenous administrable volume is 200 μL, before causing adverse physiological effects. This is reached after approximately 15 min in a 28 g mouse and an infusion rate of ∼28 μL/(g h). Allowing for a stabilization period of 5 min, this leaves an imaging window of only about 10 min, which is halved further by imaging over two cardiac cycles. This could only be achieved by reducing the imaging matrix size and acquiring unaveraged, threefold undersampled datasets, which took about 2.5 min for eight short-axis slices. Our pilot study also demonstrated a difference in maximum rate of contraction (i.e., (dV/dt)min·EDV−1) between single slice and whole LV volume analysis. While the physiological relevance of this finding is questionable in this particular example (we used normal mice), it may well play a role in surgically or genetically modified hearts, where the exact location and orientation of the midventricular slice may impact on the calculated minimum and maximum rates of volume change. Whole heart coverage eliminates this problem.
T1 has been quantified in mouse hearts before (5,6,8,14), and typically requires long repetition times to allow the spins to fully relax. We demonstrated that a threefold speedup still provides high-quality T1 parameter maps (Fig. 7c) and reproducible T1 values (Table 2), reducing the scan time from ∼2.5 min (R = 1) down to ∼50 sec (R = 3) for a single slice. Only three heartbeats (<500 msec) were required to acquire the ACS data, required for the GRAPPA reconstruction. Mapping the myocardial blood flow (i.e. perfusion) by means of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) techniques requires two T1-parameter maps, acquired with slice-selective and with global inversion pulse, respectively. Hence, parallel imaging will reduce the scan time requirements for ASL-based perfusion imaging in mouse hearts below 5 to 10 min, depending on the method used (5,8). Importantly, the ACS lines need to be acquired only once and can be used to reconstruct both parameter maps.
Contrast enhanced infarct size assessment in combination with parallel imaging was performed to investigate the benefits for 3D applications. The short-axis orientation of the imaging slab is dominated by the axial component. Therefore, the datasets were only undersampled in the first phase-encoding direction, as the coil elements are located radially. We found a statistically significant trend toward smaller infarct sizes with increasing R. However, a decrease in SNR cannot be responsible for this result alone as the LV volumes were still accurately obtained for R = 3 (Table 3). Hence, it cannot be excluded that this variation is also caused by the contrast agent kinetics, despite the acquisition of the datasets with different acceleration factors in random order. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the reduced mean infarct size for R = 2 compared with R = 1 is mainly driven by mouse 1 (Table 3), and that a comparable image quality was obtained for both datasets (as demonstrated for a midventricular slice in Fig. 8a,b). A thorough investigation of this phenomenon would require substantially more mice and a different study design, which is beyond the scope of this study. Importantly, the scan-time requirements for the acquisition of the ACS data can in our case be reduced to four heartbeats (∼500 msec) by turning off the T1 module, and by fully utilizing the reconstruction proposed by Blaimer et al (32), which eliminates the need for applying phase encoding in the third dimension.
In conclusion, we have validated the use of an eight-channel volume phased-array coil for cardiac MRI in mice at 9.4 T. We have combined 2D and 3D sequences to quantify global cardiac function, T1 relaxation times and infarct sizes, with parallel imaging techniques. A threefold acceleration was generally feasible without impairment of accuracy of the various parameters. These achievements allowed us to measure for the first time left-ventricular peak filling and ejection rates under intravenous infusion of dobutamine. Our method offers substantial reductions in scan time, without compromising the accuracy of the results. This strategy may pave the way for routine multi-parametric cardiac phenotyping, including stress tests and contrast-enhanced techniques, within a single imaging session of tolerable duration.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Titus Lanz is an employee of Rapid Biomedical. The authors would like to thank Dr Felix Breuer for providing MATLAB scripts to calculate the g-factor maps.
REFERENCES
- 1.Streif JU, Herold V, Szimtenings M, Lanz TE, Nahrendorf M, Wiesmann F, Rommel E, Haase A. In vivo time-resolved quantitative motion mapping of the murine myocardium with phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:315–321. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herold V, Morchel P, Faber C, Rommel E, Haase A, Jakob PM. In vivo quantitative three-dimensional motion mapping of the murine myocardium with PC-MRI at 17.6 T. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:1058–1064. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Epstein FH, Yang Z, Gilson WD, Berr SS, Kramer CM, French BA. MR tagging early after myocardial infarction in mice demonstrates contractile dysfunction in adjacent and remote regions. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:399–403. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gilson WD, Yang Z, French BA, Epstein FH. Measurement of myocardial mechanics in mice before and after infarction using multislice displacement-encoded MRI with 3D motion encoding. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H1491–H1497. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00632.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kober F, Iltis I, Cozzone PJ, Bernard M. Myocardial blood flow mapping in mice using high-resolution spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: influence of ketamine/xylazine and isoflurane anesthesia. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:601–606. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Streif JU, Nahrendorf M, Hiller KH, Waller C, Wiesmann F, Rommel E, Haase A, Bauer WR. In vivo assessment of absolute perfusion and intracapillary blood volume in the murine myocardium by spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:584–592. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, Toufektsian MC, French BA. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in noninfarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:1161–1167. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118495.88442.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bohl S, Lygate CA, Barnes H, Medway D, Stork LA, Schulz-Menger J, Neubauer S, Schneider JE. Advanced methods for quantification of infarct size in mice using three-dimensional high-field late gadolinium enhancement MRI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;296:H1200–H1208. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01294.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sosnovik DE, Dai G, Nahrendorf M, Rosen BR, Seethamraju R. Cardiac MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla with a transmit-receive surface coil and a cardiac-tailored intensity-correction algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:279–287. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fan X, Markiewicz EJ, Zamora M, Karczmar GS, Roman BB. Comparison and evaluation of mouse cardiac MRI acquired with open birdcage, single loop surface and volume birdcage coils. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:N451–N459. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/N01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bucholz E, Ghaghada K, Qi Y, Mukundan S, Johnson GA. Four-dimensional MR microscopy of the mouse heart using radial acquisition and liposomal gadolinium contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:111–118. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruff J, Wiesmann F, Hiller KH, Voll S, von Kienlin M, Bauer WR, Rommel E, Neubauer S, Haase A. Magnetic resonance microimaging for noninvasive quantification of myocardial function and mass in the mouse. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:43–48. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wiesmann F, Ruff J, Hiller KH, Rommel E, Haase A, Neubauer S. Developmental changes of cardiac function and mass assessed with MRI in neonatal, juvenile, and adult mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H652–H657. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.2.H652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schneider JE, Cassidy PJ, Lygate C, Tyler DJ, Wiesmann F, Grieve SM, Hulbert K, Clarke K, Neubauer S. Fast, high-resolution in vivo cine magnetic resonance imaging in normal and failing mouse hearts on a vertical 11.7 T system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:691–701. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hiba B, Richard N, Thibault H, Janier M. Cardiac and respiratory self-gated cine MRI in the mouse: comparison between radial and rectilinear techniques at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:745–753. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202–1210. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Breuer FA, Kellman P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA) Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:981–985. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schneider JE, Lanz T, Barnes H, Medway D, Stork LA, Lygate CA, Smart S, Griswold MA, Neubauer S. Ultra-fast and accurate assessment of cardiac function in rats using accelerated MRI at 9.4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:636–641. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Armenean M, Hiba B, Saint-Jalmes H, Janier M, Beuf O. Capacitive Decoupled two Element Phased Array Coil for Mouse Cardiac MRI at 7 T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2005:927. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wichmann T, Gareis D, Griswold M, Neuberger T, Wright S, Faber C, Webb A, Jakob P. A four channel transmit receive microstrip array for 17.6T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2004:1578. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ramirez MS, Bankson JA. Multiple-mouse MRI with multiple arrays of receive coils (MARCs) Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2008:1106. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lanz T, Muller M, Barnes H, Neubauer S, Schneider JE. A high-throughput eight-channel probe head for murine MRI at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:80–87. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Esparza-Coss E, Ramirez MS, Bankson JA. Wireless self-gated multiple-mouse cardiac cine MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:1203–1206. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cassidy PJ, Schneider JE, Grieve SM, Lygate C, Neubauer S, Clarke K. Assessment of motion gating strategies for mouse magnetic resonance at high magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:229–237. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez RC, Wintz P. Digital image processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barkauskas K, Blaimer M, Duerk JL, Griswold M. Estimating SNR efficiency in non-Cartesian trajectories: Cartesian is to apples as BLADE is to Schnitzel. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2007:1880. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Riffe MJ, Blaimer M, Barkauskas KJ, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. SNR Estimation in Fast Dynamic Imaging Using Bootstrapped Statistics. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2007:1879. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lygate CA, Hunyor I, Medway D, de Bono JP, Dawson D, Wallis J, Sebag-Montefiore L, Neubauer S. Cardiac phenotype of mitochondrial creatine kinase knockout mice is modified on a pure C57BL/6 genetic background. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.09.710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guignard PA, Chan W. Effects of statistical quality, sampling rate and temporal filtering techniques on the extraction of functional parameters from the left ventricular time-activity curves. Nucl Med Commun. 1984;5:559–572. doi: 10.1097/00006231-198409000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ormerod OJ, Barber RW, Wraight EP. The accuracy of functional parameters extracted from ventricular time-activity curves by Fourier curve fitting: a simulation study. Nucl Med Commun. 1986;7:91–103. doi: 10.1097/00006231-198602000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blaimer M, Breuer FA, Mueller M, Seiberlich N, Ebel D, Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. 2D-GRAPPA-operator for faster 3D parallel MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:1359–1364. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Breuer FA, Kannengiesser SA, Blaimer M, Seiberlich N, Jakob PM, Griswold MA. General formulation for quantitative G-factor calculation in GRAPPA reconstructions. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:739–746. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wiesmann F, Ruff J, Engelhardt S, Hein L, Dienesch C, Leupold A, Illinger R, Frydrychowicz A, Hiller KH, Rommel E, Haase A, Lohse MJ, Neubauer S. Dobutamine-stress magnetic resonance microimaging in mice: acute changes of cardiac geometry and function in normal and failing murine hearts. Circ Res. 2001;88:563–559. doi: 10.1161/01.res.88.6.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schneider JE, Stork LA, Bell JT, Hove MT, Isbrandt D, Clarke K, Watkins H, Lygate CA, Neubauer S. Cardiac structure and function during ageing in energetically compromised guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT)-knockout mice–a one year longitudinal MRI study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]