Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1972 Apr;51(4):876–885. doi: 10.1172/JCI106882

The Role of Intraluminal Sodium in Glucose Absorption In Vivo

David A Saltzman 1, Floyd C Rector Jr 1, John S Fordtran 1
PMCID: PMC302201  PMID: 5014615

Abstract

Active glucose absorption is thought to depend on a gradient of sodium ion concentration across the brush border membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. This concept is generally accepted, although its validity has never been adequately evaluated in the human small intestine in vivo. According to this hypothesis, the rate of glucose absorption should decrease markedly if the luminal sodium concentration is markedly reduced, and glucose absorption against a concentration gradient should cease entirely if luminal sodium is lower than intracellular sodium concentration. In the present series of experiments we were not able to show an important role of intraluminal sodium concentration in the active absorption of glucose from the human, rat, and dog ileum in vivo. Specifically, glucose absorption was minimally reduced or not reduced at all when intraluminal sodium concentration was reduced from 140 to as low as 2.5 mEq/liter. The discrepancy between our results and those of previous workers whose data suggest that removal of intraluminal sodium should markedly inhibit active glucose absorption is not entirely clear, but there are a number of differences in experimental design between most previous studies and our own. Although our data show that active glucose absorption proceeds at a near normal rate even when lumen sodium concentration is reduced below 3 mEq/liter, our results do not disprove the sodium gradient theory because of the theoretic possibility that the microclimate adjacent to the brush border has a high concentration of sodium even when luminal sodium concentration is markedly reduced. The validity of the sodium gradient hypothesis would appear to be critically dependent on such a microclimate.

Full text

PDF
876

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANNEGERS J. H. SOME EFFECTS OF CATIONS AND OF WATER ABSORPTION ON INTESTINAL HEXOSE, GLYCINE AND CATION ABSORPTION. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Aug-Sep;116:933–937. doi: 10.3181/00379727-116-29413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CRANE R. K. Hypothesis for mechanism of intestinal active transport of sugars. Fed Proc. 1962 Nov-Dec;21:891–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CSAKAY T. Z. A possible link between active transport of electrolytes and nonelectrolyes. Fed Proc. 1963 Jan-Feb;22:3–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CSAKY T. Z., HARTZOG H. G., 3rd, FERNALD G. W. Effect of digitalis on active intestinal sugar transport. Am J Physiol. 1961 Mar;200:459–460. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1961.200.3.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CSAKY T. Z., ZOLLICOFFER L. Ionic effect on intestinal transport of glucose in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1960 May;198:1056–1058. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.5.1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crane R. K., Forstner G., Eichholz A. Studies on the mechanism of the intestinal absorption of sugars. X. An effect of Na+ concentration on the apparent Michaelis constants for intestinal sugar transport, in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Nov 29;109(2):467–477. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(65)90172-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curran P. F. Coupling between transport processes in intestine. Physiologist. 1968 Feb;11(1):3–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curran P. F., Hajjar J. J., Glynn I. M. The sodium-alanine interaction in rabbit ileum. Effect of alanine on sodium fluxes. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Mar;55(3):297–308. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.3.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fordtran J. S. Marker perfusion techniques for measuring intestinal absorption in man. Gastroenterology. 1966 Dec;51(6):1089–1093. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fordtran J. S., Rector F. C., Jr, Carter N. W. The mechanisms of sodium absorption in the human small intestine. J Clin Invest. 1968 Apr;47(4):884–900. doi: 10.1172/JCI105781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fordtran J. S., Rector F. C., Jr, Ewton M. F., Soter N., Kinney J. Permeability characteristics of the human small intestine. J Clin Invest. 1965 Dec;44(12):1935–1944. doi: 10.1172/JCI105299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fordtran J. S. Segmental perfusion techniques. Gastroenterology. 1969 May;56(5):987–989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldner A. M., Schultz S. G., Curran P. F. Sodium and sugar fluxes across the mucosal border of rabbit ileum. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):362–383. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HOGBEN C. A., TOCCO D. J., BRODIE B. B., SCHANKER L. S. On the mechanism of intestinal absorption of drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959 Apr;125(4):275–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hajjar J. J., Lamont A. S., Curran P. F. The sodium-alanine interaction in rabbit ileum. Effect of sodium on alanine fluxes. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Mar;55(3):277–296. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.3.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olsen W. A., Ingelfinger F. J. The role of sodium in intestinal glucose absorption in man. J Clin Invest. 1968 May;47(5):1133–1142. doi: 10.1172/JCI105802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. RIKLIS E., QUASTEL J. H. Effects of cations on sugar absorption by isolated surviving guinea pig intestine. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1958 Mar;36(3):347–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schultz S. G., Curran P. F. Coupled transport of sodium and organic solutes. Physiol Rev. 1970 Oct;50(4):637–718. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1970.50.4.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schultz S. G., Curran P. F. The role of sodium in non-electrolyte transport across animal cell membranes. Physiologist. 1969 Nov;12(4):437–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Whittam R., Wheeler K. P. Transport across cell membranes. Annu Rev Physiol. 1970;32:21–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.32.030170.000321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES