Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2010 Oct 26;59(1):83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.10.012

POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION OF PRENATAL ESTROGENS TO THE SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION OF MATE PREFERENCES IN MICE

Olivier Brock 1, Julie Bakker 1,
PMCID: PMC3022080  NIHMSID: NIHMS256169  PMID: 21029737

Abstract

The neural mechanisms controlling sexual behavior are sexually differentiated by perinatal actions of gonadal hormones. We recently observed using female mice deficient in alphafetoprotein (AFP-KO) and which lack the protective actions of AFP against maternal estrogens, that exposure to prenatal estrogens completely defeminized their potential to show lordosis behavior in adulthood. Therefore, we determined here whether mate preferences were also affected in female AFP-KO mice. We observed a robust preference for an estrous female over an intact male in female AFP-KO mice, which were ovariectomized in adulthood and subsequently treated with estradiol and progesterone, whereas similarly treated WT females preferred the intact male over the estrous female. Gonadally intact WT males preferred the estrous female over the male, but only when visual cues were blocked by placing stimulus animals behind opaque partitions. Furthermore, when given the choice between an intact male and a castrated male, WT females preferred the intact male, whereas AFP-KO females showed no preference. Finally when given the choice between an estrous female and an ovariectomized female, WT males preferred the estrous female whereas AFP-KO females preferred the ovariectomized female or showed no preference depending on whether they could see the stimulus animals or not. Taken together, when AFP-KO females are tested under estrous conditions, they do not show any male-directed preferences, indicating a reduced sexual motivation to seek out the male in these females. However, they do not completely resemble males in their mate preferences suggesting that the male-typical pattern of mate preferences is not solely organized by prenatal estrogens.

Keywords: α-fetoprotein knockout, sexual differentiation, estradiol, mate preference

Introduction

When in breeding condition, male and female mammals usually seek out and mate with opposite-sex conspecifics. It has been well established that the neural mechanisms controlling mate preference are sexually differentiated by the perinatal actions of sex steroid hormones (Bakker, 2003). Thus, a female-directed preference develops in male rats under the early (perinatal) influence of estradiol derived from neural aromatization of testosterone (Bakker et al., 1993; Bakker et al., 1996a; Bakker et al., 1996b). Male rats treated neonatally with 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione (ATD), a specific inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme, failed to show a preference for an estrous female when given a choice between an estrous female and a sexually active male in a three compartment box, whereas normal males clearly preferred the vicinity of the estrous female. In fact, such neonatally ATD-treated male rats preferred the vicinity of the sexually active male, in particular following estradiol treatment in adulthood (Bakker et al., 1993; Bakker et al., 1996a; Bakker et al., 1996b) suggesting that their mate preference had not been masculinized.

We showed using aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice, which carry a targeted mutation in the Cyp19 gene (Bakker et al., 2002a) and as a result cannot convert androgens into estrogens, that in the mouse, like in the rat, female-directed preferences seem to develop under the influence of estrogens (Bakker et al., 2004). Gonadally intact male ArKO mice failed to show a preference for an estrous female when provided with volatile body odors from an estrous female and a sexually active male in a Y-maze (Bakker et al., 2002a), whereas wild-type (WT) males preferred to investigate the estrous female box . Adult treatment of male ArKO mice with estradiol failed to induce a female-directed preference suggesting that mate preferences develop perinatally in male mice under the influence of estrogens (Bakker et al., 2004). Similar results have been obtained in male mice carrying a mutation in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ER KO; Wersinger & Rissman, 2000). Such ER KO males failed to show a preference for an estrous female when given the choice between an anesthetized estrous female and an anesthetized intact male, further confirming the pivotal role of estrogens and ER in the development of female-directed preferences.

Interestingly, we recently observed female-typical (i.e., male-directed) preferences in female mice carrying a mutation in the Afp gene (AFP-KO) which encodes the major fetal plasma protein alpha-fetoprotein that binds estradiol with high affinity (Bakker et al., 2007). This finding was quite unexpected since female AFP-KO mice are clearly defeminized with regard to their lordosis behavior (Bakker et al., 2006) as well as their GnRH/Kisspeptin system, i.e. no steroid induced preovulatory LH surges (De Mees et al., 2006; Gonzalez-Martinez et al., 2008). The observation of a robust male-directed preference in AFP-KO females would thus suggest that the development of mate preferences is postnatally influenced by ovarian estrogens. This finding is in line with our earlier study in female ArKO mice (Bakker et al., 2002b) that suggests feminizing effects of estradiol on the female brain since female ArKO mice showed reduced levels of lordosis behavior as well as no clear mate preferences in adulthood. Taken together, there is still some ambiguity about the role of perinatal estradiol signaling in the development of mate preferences in mice.

Therefore, in the present study, to further investigate the organizational role of prenatal estrogens in mate preferences, we extended our initial study to determine mate preferences in AFP-KO and WT female mice using a different testing paradigm, i.e. a three compartment box in addition to the Y-maze. The rationale for using a three compartment box was to offer the animals different choices between stimulus animals without the need to run from one arm to the other, since preferences measured in the Y-maze may be influenced by differences in exploratory activity of the subjects. Furthermore females were tested under estrous conditions, i.e. following treatment with estradiol and progesterone and not with estradiol alone as was done in our previous study (Bakker et al, 2007). We also determined mate preferences in a group of WT males that were left gonadally intact to determine whether AFP-KO females resembled males or not.

Materials and methods

Animals

All breeding and genotyping were performed at the GIGA Neurosciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. In the present study, male and female mice heterozygous for the allele Afptm1lbmm (in the CD1 background strain; (Gabant et al., 2002; Bakker et al., 2006) were bred to generate wild type (WT) and homozygous-null (AFP-KO) offspring. Mice were genotyped by PCR analysis of tail DNA (for more detailed description, see Bakker et al., 2006; Bakker et al., 2007). Subjects were weaned at 21 days and placed into individual cages under a reversed light-dark cycle (12 h: 12 h light/dark; 20.00 h lights on and 8.00 h lights off) in special light and temperature controlled housing units. Food and water were always available ad libitum.

Stimulus animals (all of the CD1 strain) were gonadally intact males, long-term gonadectomized male (gdx) and female (ovx) mice, and ovariectomized females brought into behavioral estrus by treatment with estradiol and progesterone. Gonadectomy was performed under general anesthesia after an intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of a mixture of ketamine (80mg/kg per mouse) and medetomidine (Domitor, Pfizer, 1 mg/kg per mouse). Mice received atipamezole (Antisedan, Pfizer, 4 mg/kg per mouse) subcutaneously (s.c.) at the end of the surgery in order to antagonize medetomidine-induced effects, thereby accelerating their recovery. Ovariectomized females that were going to serve as estrous female stimulus were at the same time implanted with a Silastic capsule containing 17β-estradiol (diluted 1:1 with cholesterol, for more details see Bakker et al., 2002b).

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the National Institutes of Health “Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals”, and were approved by the Ethical Committees for Animal Use of the University of Liege.

Behavioral Tests

Mate preferences using the three compartment box

To assess mate preferences using either visual, auditory, and/or olfactory stimuli, we used a box (60 × 13 × 30 cm) that was divided into three compartments by placing either opaque or transparent partitions. Each compartment was thus 20cm in length. The partitions contained perforated holes at a height of 8cm to facilitate the diffusion of odors from the two side compartments to the middle compartment. Tests were performed during the dark phase of the light cycle (6h after lights out). Animals were habituated to the three compartment box only once on the day before the behavioral experiments by placing them in the middle compartment for 10 min (with no stimulus animals placed in the two side compartments). On the day of testing, stimulus animals were placed in the two side compartments with their own bedding to make the stimulus as odorous as possible. The subject was then introduced into the middle compartment containing no sawdust, and was observed for 9 min. The time spent poking its nose through the holes of the partition or actively sniffing the bottom of the partition was recorded with a stopwatch. Each test session was divided into 3min intervals in order to determine whether investigation times would decrease during the test, since we have previously observed that subjects have the tendency to investigate more during the first minutes of the test. However, since we did not observe any decrease along the test session, we only present the total time spent investigating the two stimuli in the results section.

Thus twenty-four adult mice (WT: 8 females and 10 males; AFP-KO: 6 females) were used in the present experiments. All females were ovariectomized and implanted in the neck with a 5mm long Silastic capsule containing 17β-estradiol (diluted 1:1 with cholesterol) and received an injection of 500μg progesterone 3 hours before each test. Subjects were tested between 10 and 17 weeks of age. All stimulus animals were awake and either presented behind transparent partitions (thus only physical contact was prevented, and mate preferences were based on visual, auditory and olfactory cues) or opaque partitions (to prevent any visual cues). We used the following experimental protocol to test mate preferences: the first series of preference tests were conducted using transparent partitions, thus allowing visual, auditory and olfactory cues. Subjects were first offered a choice between an intact male versus an estrous female. Next, they were offered a choice between an estrous female versus a longterm ovx female, and finally, a choice between an intact male versus a long-term gdx male. The second series of preference tests using opaque partitions, thus only allowing auditory and olfactory cues, was conducted the week after. Again, subjects were first offered a choice between an intact male versus an estrous female, then between an estrous female versus a long-term ovx female, and finally between an intact male versus a long-term gdx male. All tests were conducted on separate days and at least 2 days apart since female subjects were injected with progesterone before each preference test. The position (left versus right compartment) and presentation of the stimulus animals were not randomized to prevent variability due to possible residual odors in the compartments.

Mate preferences using the Y-maze

Following these tests in the three compartment box, subjects were tested once for their mate preferences in the Y-maze (for a more detailed description of the maze, see Bakker et al 2002a) with as choice volatile odors from an anesthetized male versus those of an anesthetized estrous female (one AFP-KO female died between the 3 compartment box and the Y-maze tests). Briefly, before being tested for their mate preferences, all subjects were tested for 5 min in the Y-maze without any odor stimuli to adapt to the testing apparatus and to determine whether they would develop any side preferences. When subjects were tested for mate preferences using volatile body odors (anesthetized stimulus animals) as stimuli, removable perforated opaque Plexiglas doors were placed at the distal end of each arm to separate the goal boxes from the rest of the maze. The time the subject spent sniffing the male and female sides (poking its nose through the holes of the door or actively sniffing the bottom and sides of the door of the goal box) was recorded with a stopwatch for five minutes. The maze was cleaned with Norvanol between trials. The level of anesthesia of the stimulus animals was checked between each trial and stimulus animals were placed regularly on a heating pad to prevent hypothermia.

Statistics

All behavioral data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA – Statistica 8.0) using stimulus and sex/ genotype as factors. When appropriate, all ANOVAs were followed by Fisher Least Significant Difference post-hoc comparisons adapted for repeated measures ANOVA. Only significant (p < 0.05) effects detected by the ANOVAs are presented here.

Results

Mate preferences using the three compartment box

Table 1 summarizes our predictions regarding mate preferences for the different choice paradigms. These predictions were based on our hypothesis that mate preferences of female AFP-KO mice might resemble those of WT males since they have been exposed to high levels of estrogens before birth. The mate preferences observed in our study are presented in the same table.

Table 1.

Theoretical predictions and summary of mate preferences observed under different choice paradigms in the 3 compartment box. Our working hypothesis was that AFP-KO females might resemble WT males since they are overexposed to estrogens during prenatal development. Overall AFP-KO females never showed the same mate preference as WT females, suggesting that their mate preference has been defeminized.

Preference during stimuli presentation

Group Hormonal
treatment
int vs ♀est est vs ♀ovx int vs ♂gdx
Pred TP OP Pred TP OP Pred TP OP

WT♀ Ovx/E2 + P int int None None est None int int int
WT♂ Int est None est est est None None None int
KO♀ Ovx/E2 + P est est est est ovx None None None None

Abbreviations: int = gonadally intact; est = estrous; ovx = ovariectomized; gdx = gonadectomized; E2 + P = estradiol and progesterone treatment; Pred = theoretical predictions; TP = transparent partitions; OP = opaque partitions.

Choice: gonadally intact male versus estrous female

- Transparent partitions: visual, auditory, and olfactory stimuli

As predicted, female WT mice showed a preference for the male whereas female AFPKO mice showed a preference for the female indicating that mate preferences are influenced by prenatal estrogens. By contrast, male WT male did not show a clear preference (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mean +/− SEM time spent by AFP-KO females (ovx and E2+P treated) and WT males (gonadally intact) and females (ovx and E2+P treated) mice investigating the stimulus animals when given a choice between an intact male and an estrous female behind transparent partitions allowing visual, auditory and olfactory stimulations (A) or behind opaque partitions allowing auditory and olfactory stimulations (B). The number of subjects is indicated below each sex/genotype. * P < 0.05 post-hoc comparisons between the two presented stimuli.

This was confirmed by ANOVA on the time spent investigating the male or female compartment showing a significant interaction between stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,22) = 8.84, P = 0.001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that WT females spent more time investigating the side containing the intact male over the one containing the estrous female, whereas AFPKO females spent more time investigating the side containing the estrous female over the one containing the intact male. Furthermore, WT males spent an equal amount of time investigating the two sides.

- Opaque partitions: auditory and olfactory stimuli

As observed with transparent partitions, AFP-KO females showed a preference for the female. By contrast, a preference for the male was less obvious in WT females, whereas WT males, as predicted (Table 1), now showed a preference for the female (Fig 1B).

This was confirmed by ANOVA on the time spent investigating the male versus the estrous female stimulus showing a significant interaction between stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,21) = 9.29, P = 0.001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that both AFP-KO females and WT males spent more time investigating the side containing the estrous female compared to the one containing the intact male, whereas WT females spent equivalent amounts of time investigating the two sides.

Choice: ovx female versus estrous female

- Transparent partitions: visual, auditory, and olfactory stimuli

As predicted (Table 1), WT males showed a preference for the estrous female (Fig 2A). By contrast, AFP-KO females showed a preference for the ovx female whereas WT females showed a preference for the estrous female (Table 2; Fig 2A). These latter results were not predicted.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mean +/− SEM time spent by AFP-KO females (ovx and E2+P treated) and WT males (gonadally intact) and females (ovx and E2+P treated) mice investigating the stimulus animals when given a choice between a longterm ovariectomized and an estrous female behind transparent partitions allowing visual, auditory and olfactory stimulations (A) or behind opaque partitions allowing auditory and olfactory stimulations (B). The number of subjects is indicated below each sex/genotype. * P < 0.05 post-hoc comparisons between the two presented stimuli.

ANOVA showed a significant interaction between stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,21) = 15.24, P < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that both WT males and females spent more time investigating the side containing the estrous female over the side containing the ovx female whereas it was reverse with regard to AFP-KO females.

- Opaque partitions: auditory and olfactory stimuli

When visual stimuli were blocked by using opaque partitions, none of the experimental groups showed any mate preferences (Fig 2B). There was a slight trend for a preference for the estrous female in WT mice of both sexes, which was not shown by AFPKO females.

Choice: gonadally intact male versus gdx male

- Transparent partitions: visual, auditory, and olfactory stimuli

As predicted (Table 1), WT females showed a preference for the intact male, whereas no clear mate preferences were discerned in AFP-KO females and WT males (Fig 3A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mean +/− SEM time spent by AFP-KO females (ovx and E2+P treated) and WT males (gonadally intact) and females (ovx and E2+P treated) mice investigating the stimulus animals when given a choice between an intact male and a longterm castrated (gdx) male behind transparent partitions allowing visual, auditory and olfactory stimulations (A) or behind opaque partitions allowing auditory and olfactory stimulations (B). The number of subjects is indicated below each sex/genotype. * P < 0.05 post-hoc comparisons between the two presented stimuli and # P < 0.09.

ANOVA on the time spent investigating either the intact male or the gdx male showed a significant interaction between stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,21) = 5.25, P = 0.014). Post-hoc analysis indicated that WT females spent more time investigating the side containing the intact male over the one containing the gdx male, whereas AFP-KO females and WT males spent equivalent amounts of time investigating both sides.

- Opaque partitions: auditory and olfactory stimuli

When the intact male and gdx male were placed behind opaque partitions, very similar results were obtained, i.e. WT females showed a preference for the intact male and AFP-KO females did not show any mate preference (Fig 3B). By contrast, WT males showed a preference for the intact male.

This was confirmed by ANOVA on the time spent investigating the intact male versus the gdx male showing a significant interaction between stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,21) = 5.31, P = 0.014). Post-hoc analysis indicated that WT males and females (almost reached statistical significance; P = 0.059) spent more time investigating the side containing the intact male over the one containing the gdx male (Fig. 3B) whereas AFP-KO females spent equal amounts of time investigating both sides.

Mate preferences using the Y-maze

In order to determine mate preferences based on olfactory cues only, we tested the subjects in the Y-maze with the choice between volatile odors derived from a gonadally intact male versus those derived from an estrous female. We observed very similar results as in the three compartment box tests. Female WT mice showed a male-directed preference whereas female AFP-KO mice showed a female-directed preference indicating that mate preferences are influenced by prenatal estrogens (Fig 4). However, WT males did not show a clear mate preference.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mean +/− SEM time that AFP-KO female (ovx and E2+P treated) and WT male (gonadally intact) and female (ovx and E2+P treated) mice spent investigating volatile body odors when given a choice between intact male odors and estrous female volatile odors in a Y-maze. The number of subjects is indicated below each sex/genotype. * P < 0.05 and # P < 0.09 male versus female odor stimuli.

This was confirmed by ANOVA on the time spent investigating volatile body odors from an anesthetized gonadally intact male and an anesthetized estrous female revealing a significant interaction between odor stimulus and sex/genotype (F(2,20) = 5.65, P = 0.011). Post-hoc analysis indicated that WT females spent more time investigating odors from the intact male over those from the estrous female, whereas AFP-KO females spent more time investigating odors from the estrous female. WT males spent equal amounts of time investigating both odor stimuli.

Discussion

The present study suggests that prenatal exposure to estradiol interferes with some aspects of brain and behavioral sexual differentiation, such as mate preferences. Female mice carrying a targeted mutation in the Afp gene did not show any mate preferences for the intact male under any test condition. The Afp gene encodes the fetal plasma protein, alphafetoprotein (AFP), which has a high estradiol binding capacity (Raynaud et al., 1973). Thus AFP-KO females are no longer protected from maternal estrogens during embryonic development (Gabant et al., 2002; Bakker et al., 2006). This result is in line with our earlier observation that AFP-KO females showed no lordosis behavior when paired with a sexually active male, and thus confirms that alpha-fetoprotein protects the brain from defeminizing actions of estradiol on the developing neural mechanisms controlling both proceptive and receptive patterns of feminine sexual behavior. AFP-KO females did not completely resemble WT males in their mate preferences, i.e. they did not show a preference for the estrous female over the ovx female, as was observed in WT males. These results suggest that the sexual differentiation of male-typical aspects of behavior do not solely rely on the action of estradiol during prenatal development, but that it may also require some androgen action. Indeed, Bodo & Rissman (2008) recently observed that female mice treated with a non-aromatizable androgen, i.e. dihydrotestosterone (DHT), on the day of birth, like male controls, showed a preference for female-soiled versus male-soiled bedding. In addition, such DHT-treated female mice showed a preference to investigate an anesthetized female versus an anesthetized male in a Y-maze test. The subjects in this study always had direct access to the olfactory stimuli. Under similar test conditions, we also observed that gonadally intact male ArKO mice resembled WT males in their preference to investigate estrous female bedding over male bedding, when given direct access to both types of bedding in a Y-maze (Bakker et al., 2002a). These results suggest that estrogens are not involved in the sexual differentiation of male-typical and thus female-directed preferences when provided with predominantly non-volatile odors that are contained in soiled bedding. By contrast, when nasal access to the olfactory stimuli was prevented and thus only volatile odors were presented, male ArKO mice failed to show a female-directed preference (Bakker et al., 2002a). This deficit was not corrected by adult treatment with estradiol (Bakker et al., 2004). Theseresults suggest thus a differential role for androgens versus estrogens in the sexual differentiation of male-typical preferences depending on whether the animals have direct access or not to the odor sources. However, we cannot exclude any activational effects of gonadal hormones on mate preferences. Clearly the hormonal status of our subjects, i.e AFPKO females and WT males, were not the same at the time of behavioral testing. AFP-KO females were ovariectomized in adulthood and subsequently treated with estradiol and progesterone to induce behavioral estrus, whereas WT males were left gonadally intact. We chose these hormonal regimens in order to test the animals under the most natural hormonal conditions. However, this difference in circulating hormone levels might explain why WT males showed a preference for the estrous female when given the choice between an ovx and an estrous female, whereas female AFP-KO mice did not show this preference. Perhaps if the latter would have been treated with testosterone in adulthood, we would have observed identical mate preferences between WT males and AFP-KO females. Future studies will address this possibility.

Clearly mice can use either volatile or non-volatile odors to seek out a potential mating partner. Traditionally the main olfactory system is considered to be important to detect and process volatile odors whereas the accessory olfactory system is thought to primarily detect and process non-volatile odors and to integrate them into the neuroendocrine system leading to behavioral changes. However, lesion studies have shown that the main olfactory system is crucial for mate recognition in both male and female mice whereas the accessory olfactory system seems to be less important (reviewed in Keller et al., 2009). Thus lesions of the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) completely abolished mate preferences (both with and without access to the odor stimuli) whereas lesions of the vomeronasal organ (VNO) only disrupted mate preferences when direct nasal access was provided to the odor stimuli. The latter finding suggests that the VNO and thus investigation of non-volatile odors (as contained in bedding) can contribute to the animals’ motivation to approach and investigate potential mates. With regard to the role of gonadal hormones in the sexual differentiation of mate preferences, the accessory olfactory system has sexually dimorphic characteristics (both morphological and functional) at several stages along its projection pathway to the hypothalamus (Bakker et al., 1996a; Bressler and Baum, 1996; Guillamon and Segovia, 1997), and sex steroids upregulate the ability of pheromones to activate neurons throughout this system (Paredes et al., 1998). There is also evidence of sexually differentiated function in the main olfactory system, although these sex differences are less well-described. In habituation/dishabituation studies using gonadectomized mice (Baum and Keverne, 2002; Pierman et al., 2006), females responded more reliably than males to low concentrations of volatile urinary odors from either sex. Furthermore, male ArKO mice resembled WT females in their ability to respond to lower concentrations of male urinary odors (Pierman et al., 2006), raising the possibility that the observed sex difference among WT mice in urine attraction thresholds results from the perinatal actions of estrogen in the male nervous system. However whether these sex differences in urine attraction thresholds and thus main olfactory function relate to the sex differences observed in mate preferences is rather unlikely since these sex differences are already present in the absence of any circulating gonadal hormones, whereas mate preferences clearly need to be activated by gonadal hormones. Thus, how males and females respond differently to olfactory cues may hold key to the neural basis of mate preferences but clearly more studies are needed to unravel the role of both olfactory systems in mate preference and in particular how these neural and behavioral responses are sexually differentiated by gonadal hormones.

In the present study when responding to visual, auditory and/or olfactory stimuli (transparent partitions in the three compartment box), AFP-KO females showed a robust preference for the estrous female over the male indicating that their mate preferences might have been masculinized or defeminized. Likewise, they did not show a preference for the intact male when given a choice between an intact male and a gdx male, whereas WT females clearly preferred the intact male. When we eliminated visual stimuli using opaque partitions to separate the two side compartments from the middle one, we observed some quantitative differences in investigation times of the male and female stimuli, but we observed the same pattern in AFP-KO females, i.e. a preference for the estrous female. Since it has been reported that the CD1 mouse strain (the background strain of the AFP-KO mice) show a hereditary deafness (Shone et al., 1991; GMC Coordination Team, Germany, personal communication), we could consider that when using opaque partitions, their mate preference is mostly based on olfactory stimuli; thus, results obtained in the 3 compartment box test with opaque partitions may be compared directly to those obtained in the Y-maze test using anesthetized subjects and thus volatile odors as stimuli. Hence when using the Y-maze, we found the same result, i.e. a female-directed mate preference in AFP-KO females. By contrast, mate preferences were less clear in WT males: they showed no preference for either stimulus animal. This may be due to the fact that WT males are also attracted to male odors for non-sexual reasons, such as aggression and territoriality. However, when AFP-KO females were provided with the choice between an estrous and an ovx female, they failed to show the male pattern, i.e. a preference for the estrous female, indicating that they have not really been masculinized but rather have been defeminized regarding some aspects of brain and behavioral sexual differentiation, such as to approach a sexually active male. However, as mentioned above, it could be possible that when AFP-KO females are tested under testosterone treatment instead of under estrous conditions, they will show the male pattern in mate preferences.

Finally, our current finding of a female- and not a male-directed preference in AFPKO females is in contrast with our earlier result of a male-directed preference in these mice (Bakker et al., 2007). This discrepancy can only be explained by differences in hormonal treatments of the subjects, i.e. estradiol and progesterone in the present study versus estradiol alone in our previous study, underlining thus the importance of hormonal status to observe any genotype and sex differences in mate preferences.

Research highlights

  • -

    Female mice deficient in alpha-fetoprotein do not show a male-directed mate preference

  • -

    Prenatal estradiol organizes partially mate preferences in mice

  • -

    Male-typical mate preferences requires both estrogens and androgens

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following grants: Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) (Mandat d’Impulsion Scientifique F.4502.07) and the NICHD (HD044897) to Dr Bakker. Dr. Bakker is a Research Associate of the FNRS. We also thank Dr. Mike Baum for commenting on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Bakker J, Brand T, van Ophemert J, Slob AK. Hormonal regulation of adult partner preference behavior in neonatally ATD-treated male rats. Behav. Neurosci. 1993;107:480–487. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.3.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakker J, Baum MJ, Slob AK. Neonatal inhibition of brain estrogen synthesis alters adult neural Fos responses to mating and pheromonal stimulation in the male rat. Neuroscience. 1996a;74:251–260. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakker J, Van Ophemert J, Slob AK. Sexual differentiation of odor and partner preference in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 1996b;60:489–494. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)80023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakker J, Honda S, Harada N, Balthazart J. Sexual partner preference requires a functional aromatase (cyp19) gene in male mice. Horm. Behav. 2002a;42:158–171. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker J, Honda S, Harada N, Balthazart J. The aromatase knock-out mouse provides new evidence that estradiol is required during development in the female for the expression of sociosexual behaviors in adulthood. J. Neurosci. 2002b;22:9104–9112. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-20-09104.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker J. Sexual differentiation of the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating mate recognition in mammals. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2003;15:615–621. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakker J, Honda S, Harada N, Balthazart J. Restoration of male sexual behavior by adult exogenous estrogens in male aromatase knockout mice. Horm. Behav. 2004;46:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakker J, De Mees C, Douhard Q, Balthazart J, Gabant P, Szpirer J, Szpirer C. Alpha-fetoprotein protects the developing female mouse brain from masculinization and defeminization by estrogens. Nat. Neurosci. 2006;9:220–226. doi: 10.1038/nn1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakker J, De Mees C, Szpirer J, Szpirer C, Balthazart J. Exposure to oestrogen prenatally does not interfere with the normal female-typical development of odour preferences. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2007;19:329–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2007.01540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baum MJ, Keverne EB. Sex difference in attraction thresholds for volatile odors from male and estrous female mouse urine. Horm. Behav. 2002;41:213–219. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodo C, Rissman EF. The androgen receptor is selectively involved in organization of sexually dimorphic social behaviors in mice. Endocrinology. 2008;149:4142–4150. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bressler SC, Baum MJ. Sex comparison of neuronal Fos immunoreactivity in therat vomeronasal projection circuit after chemosensory stimulation. Neuroscience. 1996;71:1063–1072. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00493-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Mees C, Laes JF, Bakker J, Smitz J, Hennuy B, Van Vooren P, Gabant P, Szpirer J, Szpirer C. Alpha-fetoprotein controls female fertility and prenatal development of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pathway through an antiestrogenic action. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:2012–2018. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.5.2012-2018.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gabant P, Forrester L, Nichols J, Van Reeth T, De Mees C, Pajack B, Watt A, Smitz J, Alexandre H, Szpirer C, Szpirer J. Alpha-fetoprotein, the major fetal serum protein, is not essential for embryonic development but is required for female fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2002;99:12865–12870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202215399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzalez-Martinez D, De Mees C, Douhard Q, Szpirer C, Bakker J. Absence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone 1 and Kiss1 activation in alpha-fetoprotein knockout mice: prenatal estrogens defeminize the potential to show preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges. Endocrinology. 2008;149:2333–2340. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillamon A, Segovia S. Sex differences in the vomeronasal system. Brain Res. Bull. 1997;44:377–382. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00217-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keller M, Baum MJ, Brock O, Brennan PA, Bakker J. The main and the accessory olfactory systems interact in the control of mate recognition and sexual behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 2009;200:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Paredes RG, Lopez ME, Baum MJ. Testosterone augments neuronal Fos responses to estrous odors throughout the vomeronasal projection pathway of gonadectomized male and female rats. Horm. Behav. 1998;33:48–57. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierman S, Douhard Q, Bakker J. Attraction thresholds and sex discrimination of urinary odorants in male and female aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice. Horm. Behav. 2006;49:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raynaud JP, Bouton MM, Gallet-Bourquin D, Philibert D, Tournemine C, Azadian-Baulanger G. Comparative study of estrogen action. Mol. Pharmacol. 1973;9:520–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shone G, Raphael Y, Miller JM. Hereditary deafness occurring in cd/1 mice. Hear Res. 1991;57:153–156. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90084-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wersinger SR, Rissman EF. Oestrogen receptor alpha is essential for female-directed chemo-investigatory behaviour but is not required for the pheromone-induced luteinizing hormone surge in male mice. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2000;12:103–110. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES