Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1973 Jan;52(1):190–197. doi: 10.1172/JCI107164

Quantitative Importance of Changes in Postglomerular Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Mediating Glomerulotubular Balance in the Rat

Barry M Brenner 1,2, Julia L Troy 1,2, Terrance M Daugharty 1,2, Robert M MacInnes 1,2
PMCID: PMC302242  PMID: 4682382

Abstract

In recent studies in this laboratory employing normal hydropenic rats we have demonstrated that the reduction in absolute proximal reabsorption that attends the experimental reduction of single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) (glomerulotubular balance) is mediated, at least in part, by the accompanying decline in postglomerular vascular protein concentration, and therefore, postglomerular colloid osmotic pressure (πEA). The present study was undertaken to define the quantitative contribution of these changes in πEA to the changes in absolute proximal reabsorption measured under these conditions. A protocol was employed which enabled us to examine the effects on absolute proximal reabsorption of reductions in filtered load brought about under conditions in which πEA remained essentially unchanged. Thus, after partial aortic constriction in 16 plasma-loaded rats, near constancy of πEA was observed in 10 (a change in efferent arteriolar protein concentration of 0.4 g/100 ml or less) and in these, uniform reductions in SNGFR averaging 16.7 nl/min were attended by reductions in absolute proximal reabsorption averaging only 1.7 nl/min, or 7% of preconstriction values. These findings, taken together with previous observations from this laboratory, suggest that the proximal reabsorptive adjustment that characterizes glomerulotubular balance in the rat is markedly blunted when changes in πEA are prevented. In the remaining six rats, a mean reduction in filtered load comparable to that observed in the above group was attended by slightly to moderately greater reductions in efferent arteriolar protein concentration, thereby fulfilling less well the stated aim of this study. Nevertheless, in accord with the above conclusion, these relatively greater reductions in πEA were accompanied by correspondingly greater reductions in absolute proximal reabsorption.

Full text

PDF
190

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner B. M., Bennett C. M., Berliner R. W. The relationship between glomerular filtration rate and sodium reabsorption by the proximal tubule of the rat nephron. J Clin Invest. 1968 Jun;47(6):1358–1374. doi: 10.1172/JCI105828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner B. M., Daugharty T. M., Ueki I. F., Troy J. L. Quantitative assessment of proximal tubule function in single nephrons of the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1971 Jun;220(6):2058–2067. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.220.6.2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner B. M., Falchuk K. H., Keimowitz R. I., Berliner R. W. The relationship between peritubular capillary protein concentration and fluid reabsorption by the renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1969 Aug;48(8):1519–1531. doi: 10.1172/JCI106118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner B. M., Galla J. H. Influence of postglomerular hematocrit and protein concentration on rat nephron fluid transfer. Am J Physiol. 1971 Jan;220(1):148–161. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.220.1.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner B. M., Troy J. L., Daugharty T. M. On the mechanism of inhibition in fluid reabsorption by the renal proximal tubule of the volume-expanded rat. J Clin Invest. 1971 Aug;50(8):1596–1602. doi: 10.1172/JCI106647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buentig W. E., Earley L. E. Demonstration of independent roles of proximal tubular reabsorption and intratubular load in the phenomenon of glomerulotubular balance during aortic constriction in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1971 Jan;50(1):77–89. doi: 10.1172/JCI106486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burg M. B., Orloff J. Control of fluid absorption in the renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1968 Sep;47(9):2016–2024. doi: 10.1172/JCI105888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daugharty T. M., Ueki I. F., Nicholas D. P., Brenner B. M. Comparative renal effects of isoncotic and colloid-free volume expansion in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1972 Jan;222(1):225–235. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.222.1.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FUHR J., KACZMARCZYK J., KRUTTGEN C. D. Eine einfache colorimetrische Methode zur Inulinbestimmung für Nieren-Clearance-Untersuchungen bei Stoffwechselgesunden und Diabetikern. Klin Wochenschr. 1955 Aug 1;33(29-30):729–730. doi: 10.1007/BF01473295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falchuk K. H., Brenner B. M., Tadokoro M., Berliner R. W. Oncotic and hydrostatic pressures in peritubular capillaries and fluid reabsorption by proximal tubule. Am J Physiol. 1971 May;220(5):1427–1433. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.220.5.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewy J. E., Windhager E. E. Peritubular control of proximal tubular fluid reabsorption in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1968 May;214(5):943–954. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.214.5.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martino J. A., Earley L. E. Demonstraton of a role of physical factors as determinants of the natriuretic response to volume expansion. J Clin Invest. 1967 Dec;46(12):1963–1978. doi: 10.1172/JCI105686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morel F., Murayama Y. Simultaneous measurement of undirectional and net sodium fluxes in microperfused rat proximal tubules. Pflugers Arch. 1970;320(1):1–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00588454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Radtke H. W., Rumrich G., Klöss S., Ullrich K. J. Influence of luminal diameter and flow velocity on the isotonic fluid absorption and 36Cl permeability of the proximal convolution of the rat kidney. Pflugers Arch. 1971;324(4):288–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00592457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Robertson C. R., Deen W. M., Troy J. L., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. 3. Hemodynamics and autoregulation. Am J Physiol. 1972 Nov;223(5):1191–1200. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.5.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spitzer A., Windhager E. E. Effect of peritubular oncotic pressure changes on proximal tubular fluid reabsorption. Am J Physiol. 1970 Apr;218(4):1188–1193. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.218.4.1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES