Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2010 Dec 19;11:713. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-713

Genetic and genomic analysis of hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/JngJ) F2 mice

Taryn P Stewart 1, Hyoung Yon Kim 2, Arnold M Saxton 3, Jung Han Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC3022919  PMID: 21167066

Abstract

Background

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common form of diabetes in humans and is closely associated with dyslipidemia and obesity that magnifies the mortality and morbidity related to T2D. The genetic contribution to human T2D and related metabolic disorders is evident, and mostly follows polygenic inheritance. The TALLYHO/JngJ (TH) mice are a polygenic model for T2D characterized by obesity, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose uptake and tolerance, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia.

Results

In order to determine the genetic factors that contribute to these T2D related characteristics in TH mice, we interbred TH mice with C57BL/6J (B6) mice. The parental, F1, and F2 mice were phenotyped at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of age for 4-hour fasting plasma triglyceride, cholesterol, insulin, and glucose levels and body, fat pad and carcass weights. The F2 mice were genotyped genome-wide and used for quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping. We also applied a genetical genomic approach using a subset of the F2 mice to seek candidate genes underlying the QTLs. Major QTLs were detected on chromosomes (Chrs) 1, 11, 4, and 8 for hypertriglyceridemia, 1 and 3 for hypercholesterolemia, 4 for hyperglycemia, 11 and 1 for body weight, 1 for fat pad weight, and 11 and 14 for carcass weight. Most alleles, except for Chr 3 and 14 QTLs, increased phenotypic values when contributed by the TH strain. Fourteen pairs of interacting loci were detected, none of which overlapped the major QTLs. The QTL interval linked to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia on distal Chr 1 contains Apoa2 gene. Sequencing analysis revealed polymorphisms of Apoa2 in TH mice, suggesting Apoa2 as the candidate gene for the hyperlipidemia QTL. Gene expression analysis added novel information and aided in selection of candidates underlying the QTLs.

Conclusions

We identified several genetic loci that affect the quantitative variations of plasma lipid and glucose levels and obesity traits in a TH × B6 intercross. Polymorphisms in Apoa2 gene are suggested to be responsible for the Chr 1 QTL linked to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Further, genetical genomic analysis led to potential candidate genes for the QTLs.

Background

Diabetes is one of the most devastating and prevalent diseases in humans. According to data from the 2007 National Diabetes Fact Sheet, 23.6 million people in the United States (7.8% of the population) have diabetes http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common form of diabetes and is often associated with a collection of metabolic disorders including dyslipidemia and obesity which substantially magnifies the mortality and morbidity related to T2D [1,2]. Hypertriglyceridemia is the main lipid abnormality in T2D patients that usually occurs years before diabetes, and is a strong predictor of diabetes [2]. The genetic contribution to human T2D and related metabolic disorders is evident, and mostly follows polygenic inheritance [3,4].

TALLYHO/JngJ (TH) mice are a polygenic model for T2D characterized by glucose intolerance and hyperglycemia (limited to males) and show metabolic abnormalities including obesity, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperlipidemia [5-7]. The TH male mice exhibit a striking rise in plasma triglyceride levels at an early age when their plasma glucose levels are steadily rising [6]. On the other hand, TH female mice do not exhibit this triglyceride spike although they maintain hypertriglyceridemia compared with age- and sex-matched C57BL/6J (B6) mice. Some degree of vascular dysfunction is also reported in TH mice [8,9].

In the present study, we performed a genome-wide scan to search for quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting hypertriglyceridemia in TH mice using male F2 mice from a cross of B6 × TH. We also searched for loci linked to hypercholesterolemia, hyperinsulinemia, obesity, and hyperglycemia. Finally, we applied a genetical genomic approach and assessed the data systemically for candidate genes at the QTLs.

Results

Phenotypes in parental, F1, and F2 mice

Body weights and 4-hour fasting plasma levels of triglyceride, total cholesterol, insulin, and glucose were measured at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of age. At 24 weeks of age, mice were killed and the five regional fat pads were dissected and weighed. In the F2 intercross mice, where B6 and TH genomes are mixed and reassembled, there was wide variation in trait values that even exceeded the ranges in parental mice (Table 1). This indicates that multiple genetic variants between the parental strains were responsible for the expression of traits.

Table 1.

Phenotypes of the parental, F1, and F2 mice (males).

B6 (n) F1 (n) TH (n) F2 (n)
(lowest, highest)
16 F2 mice chosen for microarray
Lower (n = 8); Upper (n = 8)
Triglyceride (mg/dl)
8 wk 63 ± 12 (9)a 153 ± 12 (15)b 438 ± 41 (7)c 168 ± 3 (368) (60, 472) 130 ± 14; 207 ± 22 (P = 0.009)
12 wk 68 ± 8 (14)a 186 ± 11 (19)b 237 ± 53 (9)b 166 ± 3 (382) (44, 357) 135 ± 14; 230 ± 22 (P = 0.003)
16 wk 63 ± 3 (18)a 168 ± 8 (19)b 438 ± 39 (16)c 167 ± 4 (384) (20, 486) 120 ± 15; 191 ± 27 (P = 0.038)
20 wk 71 ± 7 (18)a 180 ± 20 (19)b 367 ± 32 (16)c 181 ± 4 (377) (56, 479) 126 ± 17; 336 ± 24 (P < 0.0001)
24 wk 60 ± 6 (18)a 221 ± 19 (19)b 368 ± 33 (16)c 181 ± 4 (375) (40, 436) 81 ± 7; 331 ± 17 (P < 0.0001)

Cholesterol (mmol/l)
8 wk 2.9 ± 0.2 (9)a 2.3 ± 0.1 (15)b 4.0 ± 0.1 (7)c 2.9 ± 0.1 (365) (0.7, 7.6) 2.2 ± 0.2; 2.9 ± 0.4 (P = 0.09)
12 wk 2.6 ± 0.2 (14)a 3.1 ± 0.2 (19)b 2.9 ± 0.1 (9)b 3.1 ± 0.1 (378) (0.4, 8.5) 2.5 ± 0.3; 3.1 ± 0.5 (P = 0.36)
16 wk 3.0 ± 0.3 (19)a 2.6 ± 0.1 (19)a 3.6 ± 0.3 (16)b 3.0 ± 0.1 (384) (1.0, 6.8) 2.5 ± 0.3; 3.6 ± 0.4 (P = 0.04)
20 wk 2.1 ± 0.1 (18)a 3.5 ± 0.3 (19)b 4.7 ± 0.3 (16)c 3.3 ± 0.1 (377) (1.1, 6.8) 2.7 ± 0.3; 3.6 ± 0.2 (P = 0.03)
24 wk 1.9 ± 0.1 (18)a 3.6 ± 0.1 (19)b 4.0 ± 0.4 (16)b 3.3 ± 0.1 (375) (1.3, 8.1) 2.8 ± 0.2; 3.1 ± 0.5 (P = 0.58)

Glucose (mg/dl)
8 wk 175 ± 10 (9)a 175 ± 11 (15)a 292 ± 48 (7)b 176 ± 2 (368) (98, 353) 163 ± 11; 183 ± 9 (P = 0.20)
12 wk 132 ± 6 (14)a 147 ± 9 (19)a 252 ± 40 (9)b 166 ± 2 (382) (45, 473) 145 ± 8; 168 ± 11 (P = 0.10)
16 wk 181 ± 14 (19)a 166 ± 4 (19)a 460 ± 38 (16)b 169 ± 3 (384) (62, 575) 144 ± 15; 160 ± 11 (P = 0.40)
20 wk 177 ± 10 (18)a 156 ± 5 (19)a 364 ± 36 (16)b 165 ± 3 (378) (64, 492) 144 ± 17; 163 ± 13 (P = 0.40)
24 wk 175 ± 10 (18)a 162 ± 8 (19)a 387 ± 33 (16)b 162 ± 3 (375) (40, 599) 131 ± 9; 128 ± 13 (P = 0.83)

Insulin (ng/ml)
8 wk 0.07 ± 0.02 (9)a 0.96 ± 0.17 (15)b 1.81 ± 0.41 (7)c 1.31 ± 0.06 (384) (0.01, 9.71) 1.45 ± 0.31; 1.36 ± 0.28 (P = 0.83)
12 wk 0.22 ± 0.07 (13)a 1.12 ± 0.15 (19)b 0.98 ± 0.33 (9)b 1.55 ± 0.08 (376) (0.06, 12.36) 0.80 ± 0.14; 1.28 ± 0.17 (P = 0.05)
16 wk 0.35 ± 0.09 (18)a 1.24 ± 0.13 (19)b 0.98 ± 0.26 (15)b 2.17 ± 0.11 (381) (0.07, 15.03) 1.19 ± 0.23; 1.94 ± 0.43 (P = 0.20)
20 wk 0.42 ± 0.11 (18)a 2.14 ± 0.26 (19)b 1.56 ± 0.41 (16)b 2.39 ± 0.15 (376) (0.02, 23.18) 1.12 ± 0.36; 2.35 ± 0.47 (P = 0.06)
24 wk 0.41 ± 0.10 (10)a 2.78 ± 0.55 (16)b 2.31 ± 0.56 (13)b 2.70 ± 0.16 (371) (0.06, 23.97) 2.59 ± 1.10; 5.13 ± 2.10 (P = 0.30)

Body weight (g)
8 wk 22 ± 0.4 (14)a 30 ± 0.5 (15)b 31 ± 0.5 (7)b 29 ± 0.2 (385) (20, 40) 30 ± 1.1; 29 ± 0.9 (P = 0.33)
12 wk 24 ± 0.5 (18)a 33 ± 0.6 (19)b 32 ± 0.6 (16)b 33 ± 0.2 (385) (23, 45) 33 ± 1.2; 33 ± 1.2 (P = 0.65)
16 wk 25 ± 0.5 (18)a 36 ± 0.7 (19)b 34 ± 0.8 (16)b 35 ± 0.2 (383) (24, 49) 35 ± 1.5; 36 ± 1.3 (P = 0.66)
20 wk 27 ± 0.5 (18)a 38 ± 0.7 (19)b 36 ± 1.0 (16)c 37 ± 0.3 (378) (25, 52) 36 ± 2.0; 38 ± 1.1 (P = 0.39)
24 wk 28 ± 0.4 (18)a 41 ± 0.6 (19)b 36 ± 1.4 (16)c 39 ± 0.3 (373) (25, 59) 38 ± 2.2; 41 ± 1.3 (P = 0.26)

Fat pad & Carcass weights (g)
IG 0.34 ± 0.02 (18)a 1.37 ± 0.07 (19)b 0.69 ± 0.15 (16)c 0.99 ± 0.03 (372) (0.07, 2.66) 0.64 ± 0.14; 1.14 ± 0.10 (P = 0.01)
ED 0.43 ± 0.03 (18)a 1.86 ± 0.07 (19)b 0.98 ± 0.23 (16)c 1.41 ± 0.03 (372) (0.19, 3.21) 1.11 ± 0.25; 1.69 ± 0.19 (P = 0.08)
MS 0.11 ± 0.01 (18)a 0.60 ± 0.03 (19)b 0.24 ± 0.06 (16)c 0.40 ± 0.01 (372) (0.07, 1.30) 0.35 ± 0.12; 0.46 ± 0.04 (P = 0.40)
RP 0.12 ± 0.01 (18)a 0.64 ± 0.02 (19)b 0.26 ± 0.06 (16)c 0.43 ± 0.01 (371) (0.05, 1.47) 0.31 ± 0.07; 0.63 ± 0.13 (P = 0.05)
SC 0.14 ± 0.01 (18)a 0.72 ± 0.04 (19)b 0.32 ± 0.09 (16)c 0.50 ± 0.02 (372) (0.05, 3.26) 0.32 ± 0.08; 0.59 ± 0.06 (P = 0.01)
Sum 1.14 ± 0.06 (18)a 5.17 ± 0.20 (19)b 2.34 ± 0.55 (16)c 3.72 ± 0.09 (371) (0.52, 8.59) 2.69 ± 0.61; 4.51 ± 0.31 (P = 0.02)
Carcass 26 ± 0.4 (18)a 34 ± 0.5 (19)b 31 ± 1.0 (16)c 33 ± 0.2 (371) (23, 47) 34 ± 1.8; 34 ± 1.0 (P = 0.91)

Data are presented as mean ± sem. Means labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another comparing B6, F1 and TH (P < 0.05). wk, week; IG, inguinal; ED, epididymal; MS, mesenteric; RP, retroperitoneal including perirenal; SC, subscapular; Sum, sum of the 5 fat pads above; B6, C57BL/6J; TH, TALLYHO/JngJ.

Hypertriglyceridemia appeared to be inherited in a semidominant manner since the mean plasma level of triglyceride of F1 (B6 × TH) progeny was intermediate between the means of the two parental strains (Table 1). Hypercholesterolemia, on the other hand, showed a complex inheritance.

The F1 population showed a mean plasma glucose level that was indistinguishable from B6 strain, suggesting that hyperglycemia is inherited in a recessive manner for the TH alleles (Table 1). Plasma insulin levels in F1 mice were between the parental values at 8 weeks of age, but became similar to TH mice at later ages.

The F1 mice initially showed higher body weights than B6 mice, but comparable to TH mice (Table 1). However, at later ages hybrid vigor (or heterosis), where a first-generation hybrid displays superior phenotypic expression over their parents, was observed for body weights. Increases both in fat mass (measured by fat pad weights) and lean mass (measured by carcass weight) appeared to contribute to the increased body weights in the F1 mice.

Significant QTLs identified by composite interval genome-wide scans

We collected approximately 380 F2 male mice, and individual mice were genotyped with 68 simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers at approximately 20-cM intervals. A genome-wide QTL analysis was then performed for the traits in the male F2 population at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of age. Figure 1 represents the distribution of trait values at 24 weeks of age, with most traits showing approximately normal distributions, but a few traits had positive skew. Similar distribution patterns were observed at all other ages for each trait (not shown). QTLs with genome-wide significance levels > 5% are summarized in Table 2. Lod score plots of genome-wide scans are depicted in Figure 2 and 3 for traits with significant QTL.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histogram showing distribution of traits at 24 weeks of age in F2 mice. We interbred TH mice with B6 mice, and the resultant F2 mice (male) were phenotyped at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of age for 4-hour fasting plasma triglyceride, total cholesterol, insulin, and glucose levels and body, fat pad and carcass weights. Count is the number of mice.

Table 2.

Summary of major QTLs detected in the F2 mice.

Chr Best location,
cM (CI)
Closest marker
to peak LOD
Peak LOD GW Sig. % Phenotype value
B6/B6 (n) B6/TH (n) TH/TH (n)

Triglyceride (mg/dl)
8 wk 1 95.7
(25.7, 96.9)
D1Mit113 3.67 S 3.63 157 ± 7 (89)a 164 ± 4 (201)a 188 ± 6 (78)b
12 wk 11 65
(20, 79)
D11Mit132 3.76 S 1.72 153 ± 5 (90)a 169 ± 4 (182)b 173 ± 6 (109)b
20 wk 4 31.3
(21.3, 41.3)
D4Mit178 4.47 VS 4.82 161 ± 6 (92)a 178 ± 5 (201)a 210 ± 9 (83)b
24 wk 8 55.75
(50, 55.7)
D8Mit242 3.94 S 4.29 159 ± 7 (97)a 185 ± 5 (186)b 199 ± 8 (91)b

Cholesterol (mmol/l)
8 wk 1 86.7
(84.7, 87.7)
D1Mit113 11.83 VS 4.96 2.5 ± 0.1 (88)a 2.9 ± 0.1 (200)b 3.2 ± 0.1 (77)c
12 wk 1 89.7
(86.7, 96.7)
D1Mit113 6.55 VS 6.76 2.6 ± 0.1 (88)a 3.2 ± 0.1 (211)b 3.5 ± 0.1 (79)c
3 10.6
(5.6, 11.6)
D3Mit304 4.07 S 4.31 3.5 ± 0.1 (102)a 3.0 ± 0.1 (177)b 2.9 ± 0.1 (99)b
16 wk 1 93.7
(86.7, 96.9)
D1Mit113 7.99 VS 8.62 2.6 ± 0.1 (92)a 3.0 ± 0.1 (212)b 3.5 ± 0.1 (80)c
20 wk 1 92.7
(86.7, 96.9)
D1Mit113 9.83 VS 11.05 2.8 ± 0.1 (89)a 3.2 ± 0.1 (209)b 3.9 ± 0.1 (79)c

Glucose (mg/dl)
24 wk 4 67.3
(66.3, 70.3)
D4Mit312 6.13 VS 2.89 147 ± 4 (102)a 167 ± 4 (205)b 172 ± 8 (66)b

Body weight (g)
20 wk 11 41
(32, 43)
D11Mit41 4.51 VS 2.17 36 ± 0.5 (72)a 38 ± 0.4 (199)b 38 ± 0.5 (103)b
24 wk 11 41
(32, 43)
D11Mit41 4.43 VS 1.74 38 ± 0.6 (72)a 40 ± 0.4 (197)b 40 ± 0.6 (103)b
1 35.7
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 3.52 S 4.15 37 ± 0.6 (92)a 40 ± 0.4 (180)b 41 ± 0.6 (101)b

Fat pad weight (g)
IG 1 41.7
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 5.38 VS 5.88 0.79 ± 0.05 (92)a 1.02 ± 0.04 (179)b 1.12 ± 0.05 (101)b
ED 1 39
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 6.20 VS 7.02 1.15 ± 0.06 (92)a 1.43 ± 0.05 (179)b 1.61 ± 0.06 (101)c
MS 1 41.7
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 4.14 S 4.78 0.32 ± 0.02 (92)a 0.42 ± 0.02 (179)b 0.43 ± 0.02 (101)b
RP 1 39
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 4.62 VS 5.40 0.33 ± 0.02 (91)a 0.44 ± 0.02 (179)b 0.47 ± 0.02 (101)b
SC 1 39
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 6.39 VS 7.24 0.37 ± 0.03 (92)a 0.54 ± 0.03 (179)b 0.56 ± 0.03 (101)b
Sum 1 40.7
(33.7, 44.7)
D1Mit215 6.26 VS 7.01 2.9 ± 0.16 (92)a 3.8 ± 0.13 (179)b 4.2 ± 0.18 (101)b

Carcass weight (g)
11 40
(32, 43)
D11Mit41 4.48 VS 1.88 32 ± 0.4 (72)a 34 ± 0.3 (197)b 34 ± 0.4 (102)b
14 72.5
(65.5, 76.1)
D14Mit107 3.67 S 4.53 34 ± 0.5 (81)a 34 ± 0.3 (193)a 32 ± 0.4 (96)b

Phenotypic data are presented as mean ± sem. Means labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05). Chr, chromosome; CI, 2 LOD support interval; %, total variance explained by R-square; IG, inguinal; ED, epididymal; MS, mesenteric; RP, retroperitoneal including perirenal; SC, subscapular; Sum, sum of the 5 fat pads above; GW Sig., genome-wide significance; S, significant; VS, very significant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Plot of one-dimensional genome-wide scans for (B6 × TH) F2 male progeny on 19 autosomes. The associated phenotypic traits are plasma triglyceride and cholesterol levels as indicated. The lod score is plotted as a function of genome location. The horizontal lines represent critical values at the 99% (P < 0.01), 95% (P < 0.05) and 90% (P < 0.1) significance levels.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plot of one-dimensional genome-wide scans for (B6 × TH) F2 male progeny on 19 autosomes. The associated phenotypic traits are plasma glucose levels and body, fat pad and carcass weights as indicated. The lod score is plotted as a function of genome location. The horizontal lines represent critical values at the 99% (P < 0.01), 95% (P < 0.05) and 90% (P < 0.1) significance levels.

Triglyceride

Four significant QTLs for plasma triglyceride level had age-specific activity; loci near D1Mit113 on chromosome (Chr) 1 for 8 week, D11Mit132 on Chr 11 for 12 week, D4Mit178 on Chr 4 for 20 week, and D8Mit242 on Chr 8 for 24 week. Hypertriglyceridemic contributions were from TH genome. TH alleles for Chr 1 and Chr 4 QTLs appeared to be recessive while Chr 11 and Chr 8 QTLs were dominant.

Cholesterol

A very significant QTL near D1Mit113 on Chr 1 was linked to plasma total cholesterol levels. The hypercholesterolemic contribution of the locus was from the TH genome and appeared to be additive for all ages. In addition, a QTL near D3Mit304 on proximal Chr 3 was also responsible for the plasma total cholesterol levels at 12 week; the B6 allele at this locus was associated with increased plasma levels in total cholesterol, appearing recessive.

Glucose

On distal Chr 4, a QTL near D4Mit312 was very significantly linked to the plasma glucose levels, with 2 LOD support interval (CI) of 66.3 - 70.3 cM. For that locus, the TH alleles were associated with increased plasma glucose levels, and inheritance appeared to be dominant for the TH allele.

Insulin

No significant linkages were observed for plasma insulin levels.

Body weight

Two significant QTLs linked to body weight were identified near D11Mit41 on Chr 11 and D1Mit215 on Chr 1. For both QTLs, the TH alleles contributed to increased body weights with dominant action.

Fat pad weight

A significant QTL linked to fat pad weights was identified near D1Mit215 on Chr 1. The TH allele was associated with increases in all regional fat pad weights studied and appeared dominant for all except epididymal fat pad weights.

Carcass weight

Two QTLs near D11Mit41 on Chr 11 and D14Mit107 on Chr 14, respectively, were significantly linked to carcass weights (surrogate lean body mass). The TH alleles and the B6 alleles were associated with higher carcass weight at Chr 11 locus and Chr 14 locus, respectively. The Chr 11 QTL location overlapped the QTL associated with body weight.

Epistasis and interacting QTLs

A pair-wise genome scan was conducted to examine all marker-marker interactions and identified 14 significant epistatic interacting QTLs; 4 for triglyceride, 5 for total cholesterol, 3 for glucose, and 2 for fat pad weight (Table 3). When we compared these epistatic QTLs with the single QTLs identified by single-locus genome scans, no locations overlapped.

Table 3.

Summary of all QTL pairs detected using pair-wise scans in the F2 mice.

QTL 1 QTL 2 LOD %
Trait Chr Best location (cM) Closest marker to peak LOD Chr Best location (cM) Closest marker to peak LOD Full Add Int

Glu 12 wk 15 53.7 D15Mit2 19 27 D19Mit30 10.4 3.6 6.8 8.5
5 36 D5Mit80 7 28.7 D7Mit231 9.3 2.9 6.4 6.5
12 53 D12Mit233 19 28 D19Mit30 9.3 2.8 6.5 5.8

Tg 16 wk 3 21.6 D3Mit304 13 38 D13Mit26 12.3 2.1 10.2 4.8

Tg 20 wk 7 79.7 D7Mit109 14 59.5 D14Mit102 11.7 1.3 10.4 4.8
10 24 D10Mit130 17 75 D17Mit123 10.8 2.8 8.1 5.0
5 99 D5Mit101 16 51.3 D16Mit152 11.1 0.9 10.2 3.1

Chol 8 wk 5 33 D5Mit80 17 30 D17Mit54 12.9 2.1 10.8 4.8
5 107 D5Mit101 14 57.5 D14Mit107 9.3 1.9 7.4 4.0

Chol 24 wk 1 68.7 D1Mit26 10 50 D10Mit11 13.4 5.8 7.6 7.5
15 45.7 D5Mit2 16 57.3 D16Mit152 10.5 2.0 8.6 4.2
4 14.3 D4Mit97 5 98 D5Mit101 13.6 1.8 11.8 3.7

IG FPW 7 82.7 D7Mit109 8 52 D8Mit242 9.9 3.0 6.9 3.7

Sum FPW 7 71.7 D7Mit109 17 76 D17Mit123 9.8 2.7 7.1 3.9

Chr, chromosome; Full, the Lod score for the full model (including additive effects and interaction); Add, the Lod score for two locus additive effects; Int, the Lod score for the interaction (Full - Add); %, total variance explained by R-square; Glu, glucose; Tg, trighlyceride; Chol, cholesterol; IG FPW, inguinal fat pad weight; Sum FPW, sum of the 5 regional fat pad weights; wk, week.

It was noteworthy that a locus near D19Mit30 on Chr 19 interacted with two different loci affecting plasma glucose levels, one near D15Mit2 on Chr 15 and the other near D12Mit233 on Chr 12. At 12 weeks of age, mice that were homozygous for the B6 alleles at the D19Mit30 locus exhibited a significantly lower plasma glucose level when they were homozygous either for the TH allele at the D15Mit2 locus or for the B6 allele at the D12Mit233 locus as compared with other possible genotype combinations at the loci (Figure 4A and 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Two locus interactive effects in (B6 × TH) F2 male progeny. The associated phenotypic traits are hyperglycemia (A and B) and hypertriglyceridemia (C). Lines connect means ± SEM of the plasma glucose or triglyceride levels for one marker on the X axis as homozygous for B6 (B), heterozygous for TH and B6 (H) or homozygous for TH (T) associated with another marker homozygous for B6 (B, solid line), heterozygous for B6 and TH (H, dotted line) or homozygous for TH (T, dashed line).

Similarly, mice that were homozygous for the B6 allele at the D14Mit107 locus on Chr 14 had a significantly lower plasma triglyceride level if they were homozygous for the TH alleles at the D7Mit109 locus on Chr 7 (20 weeks of age) (Figure 4C).

Candidate genes using genetical genomics in the F2 mice

In order to seek candidate genes underlying the QTLs, we applied a genetical genomics approach using a subset of the F2 mice (n = 16) with differential hypertriglyceridemia, but not overtly diabetic. We analyzed gene expression levels in four critical tissues associated with diabetes, including liver, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and pancreas. ANOVA was used to identify associations between markers and gene expression in each tissue. In total, 8764 gene expression traits in liver, 1410 in adipose tissue, 1832 in skeletal muscle, and 4130 in pancreas exhibited an association with the markers tested.

Among these, we searched for gene expression traits that were associated with the markers linked to physiological traits to select candidate genes for the QTLs (Table 4). When cis-acting transcript is defined as a locus residing within 20 cM of the gene location [10], this analysis revealed 4 putative cis-acting transcripts; coiled-coil domain containing 46 (Ccdc46) gene in liver for the hypertriglyceridemia QTL near D11Mit132, signal-regulatory protein beta 1 (Sirpb1) gene in adipose tissue for the hypercholesterolemia QTL near D3Mit304, RIKEN cDNA 1700009P17 (1700009P17Rik) gene in liver for the hypercholesterolemia QTL near D1Mit113, and chymotrypsin C (caldecrin) (Ctrc) gene in pancreas for the diabetes QTL near D4Mit312. These 4 genes have mostly unknown association with lipid and glucose metabolism or obesity.

Table 4.

Gene expression associated with physiological trait QTL markers in the subset of F2 mice (n = 16).

Marker Tissue Gene
D1Mit113 Adipose tissue Abcb9, Dub2a, Myo1a, 4930571K23Rik, Pnma2, Tcea2, Fahd2a, Zmiz1, Actr1b, Rab3 d, Zscan2, Myo10, Arhgap8, Mrgpra2, 4933431C10Rik, Oprm1
Liver Clasp1, 1700009P17Rik, 9130009M17Rik, Wdr40b, Rasal2, Gabra3, Mrgpre, Lsm2, 2610039C10Rik, Zfp354b
Muscle A630033E08Rik, Pcdhgc4, Kbtbd3, Tbc1d23, Tmem181
Pancreas Snca, Lrch1, Plcl1, Lpin2, 2410005O16Rik, Abcb9, Rpp30, Sepw1

D11Mit132 Adipose tissue Rab33a, Homer1, Cntfr, 2310068J16Rik, 4930427A07Rik
Liver Diablo, Snx29, Galnt3, H13, Dqx1, 4930563E22Rik, 4931429I11Rik, Tmem129, Rasgrp1, 4930452B06Rik, 4930528G23Rik, 4933413J09Rik, Ccdc46, Zfp61, Ypel2, Hs3st3a1, 4933404O12Rik, Lgi3, Cplx2, Pif1, Fkrp, 9530010C24Rik, Rasa4, Rlbp1, Hoxa10, Lysmd2, Mipol1, Hps1, Csl, Fgf18, Mcpt9, Rnf151, Ggt7, Sema6c, 4921511C04Rik, Med13l, 4930432H15Rik, A330021E22Rik, Vwc2, Nfasc, Zic4, Htt, A230001M10Rik, Zic2, Cnnm4, Eif4e2, Tbx19, Kcnab3, Napg
Muscle Tmem144, Dsc3, Tm9sf1, Fancb, Eif3 d, Gtf2e2, Tph1, 2900022B07Rik, 2010004M13Rik, Mgat3
Pancreas Ednrb, Epn2, Rnf214, Spata17, 2310047O13Rik, Dnajb4, 4930455H04Rik, Emp2, Cds2, Slc2a13, Cybb, 3110052M02Rik, 4933403F05Rik, Skiv2l2, Klhl13, Myo1b, Supt16 h, Usp9x, Crot, Ogt, P4ha1, Igf1r, Akt1s1, Rabepk, Ptprj, Pml, Chd1, Tspan8, 6430531B16Rik, 4933411K20Rik, Tpst1, Bnip2, Map4k4, Nup50, Fzd8, Olfml2b, Anapc4, Car8, Eif3s10

D4Mit178 Adipose tissue Trpv4, Azgp1, Klf1, B3galt6, Cgref1, Ptprk, 1110033F14Rik, Gpm6b
Liver Tcfe2a, Wipi1, Lyrm2, Nudt16l1, Ttf2, Gngt2, 9430051O21Rik, Cd86, Rad23b, Tmem175, Pola1, Ankrd49
Pancreas Lmbr1, 4932415G12Rik, Clock, Itm2a, Tcf25

D8Mit242 Adipose tissue Adrb3, Isca1, Cep55, Ppp1r9a
Liver 6530406A20Rik, Lsm6

D3Mit304 Adipose tissue Rhod, Akt3, Dnmt3a, Grhl1, Dppa3, Rpl7, Krt20, Tm7sf4, Palb2, Hk3, Dusp16, Acad9, Pctk3, Cxcl2, Fabp7, Top3b, Slamf6, Sirpb1
Liver Exosc9, Kcne3, Acad9, 2610202C22Rik, Dmc1, Mapk8
Muscle Os9, Coro1c, Gna-rs1, 4921508A21Rik, 5830420C07Rik, H2-T18
Pancreas 4632419K20Rik, Rbbp8, Foxk2, Ccdc7, Stag1, Uba1, Rcor3, Cryl1, Vmn2r29, 2610028H24Rik, Dag1, Itga5

D4Mit312 Adipose tissue Gjb3, Tnni2, Tnnc2, Ckm, Pvalb, Lamb3, Slc39a3, Mmp3, Atp2a1, 1110008J03Rik, Mark1, Hipk1, Ptcra, Tcap, Mfap4, 2510006D16Rik, C430004E15Rik, Myh4, Ttn, 9030625N01Rik, A930012M21Rik, 2900011L18Rik, Fntb, Dhx29, Mylpf, Tnnt3, Sphk1, 2410127E18Rik, 3110082I17Rik, Marveld3, 9930104L06Rik, Plekhg4, Flnb, Lpin2
Liver Vmn2r88, Egr2, Ftsj1, 1810059H22Rik, Frmd5, Gng2, Asxl2, P4ha3, Fpr1, Zfp54, 4921515E04Rik, Rab36, Pou2f1, Syt7, 4930552P12Rik, Klk1b1, Map3k4, Pip5k1b, Rims2
Muscle Rbm26, Efcab4a, Edg5, Jam2, Ptpn14, OTTMUSG, Hif1a, Cdca7l, Ep400, 1110034A24Rik, Bet1l, Ick, Bcl9, Shc4, Adam12, Col9a1
Pancreas Gnb1, Pdcd6ip, Stub1, Ctrc, Alkbh5, Xpnpep3, Slc25a29, Zswim5, H13, 4930534B04Rik, Ascc2, St3gal6, Rock2, Dnm3os, Bet1l, Lox, Gjb4, Xpc

D11Mit41 Adipose tissue Ptpn11
Liver Dusp3
Muscle Exoc7, Plekhg1
Pancreas Pja2

D1Mit215 Adipose tissue Isl1, Plekhf2, Baalc, Dusp18, Lim2, A130004G07Rik, Vstm2l
Liver Rnd3, Slc7a4, Jarid1b, Clasp1, 1700009P17Rik, Casp3, D730045B01Rik, Foxp4, Nono, 5830411G16Rik, 6030458A19Rik, Dok7, Centb1, Ddef2, 5830418K08Rik, Tmem179, Cux1, 1110001A07Rik, Sp6, Zfp560, Pnmal1, Npb, 7420416P09Rik, Vta1, Crybb1, 9930031P18Rik, Tmem202, 4932409I22Rik, Nav2, Bhlhb8, Skiv2l2, Zfp383, Cxcl9, Akr7a5, Ttc3, Itga3, Gpatch2, Ash2l, Dub2a, Gypa, 2210407C18Rik
Muscle 2810454L23Rik, Ugcgl2, 4930558K02Rik, Cercam, Fbxo10, Rbms3, C130039O16Rik, D130051D11Rik, Ifnar2, Smchd1, Edg6, Fgd5, Sertad3, Mcm4
Pancreas Sept8, Bloc1s3, Mchr1, Mfhas1, Prpf40a, Morc2a, Slc40a1, Haghl, Grb10, 8430437O03Rik, 2210404J11Rik, Fndc4, Hsd17b4, Sf3b2, Alkbh1, Zfp652, Plcxd2, B430119L13Rik, Pdzk1ip1, Epha10, Spnb2, Lrch1, 9930031P18Rik, Mfap5, Det1, Fcrls, Myh11, Ifna5, Gpx6, Zhx3, 4930503L19Rik, Ascc3l1, Gli3, Tubb5, Pex10, Snf1lk, Cog1, Gm693, Pogz, Dbil5, Capn9, Itm2a, Ttc3, Zfp282, Cldn23, Clec4a2, Eif3s10

D14Mit107 Adipose tissue Spg11
Liver Hbb-b1, Gpr146, Hba-a1
Muscle Shq1

Genes in bold are putative cis-acting transcripts.

As another method to select possible candidate genes, we searched for gene expression corresponding to genes located near the QTLs that were correlated with physiological traits [11]. Gene expression levels of many genes in adipose tissue were correlated (P < 0.05) with body weights and/or fat pad weights (Table 5). Notable ones included insulin receptor substrate 1 (Irs1) gene and monoacylglycerol O-acyltrasferase 1 (Mogat1) gene located within the Chr 1 obesity QTL interval near D1Mit215. Within the Chr 1 QTL interval, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (Igfbp2) gene expression levels in liver were also negatively correlated with mesenteric fat pad weights. Interestingly, we also observed increased gene expression levels of multiple chemokine (C-C motif) ligands, including Ccl9, Ccl6, and Ccl3 in adipose tissue, being positively correlated with body and fat pad weights. These genes all map on the Chr 11 body weight QTL interval near D11Mit41.

Table 5.

Correlations of the gene expression levels with physiological traits.

Tissue Positively
correlated
Negatively
correlated
Trait
Near D1Mit113
Adipose tissue Prrx1, Creg1, Nuf2, Sh2d1b1, Fcgr4, Fcgr3, Fcer1g, Adamts4, Cd84, Pea15a, Atp1a4, Slamf9, Tagln2, Vsig8, Slamf8, Wdr26, Degs1, Kctd3, Atf3 Gas5, Opn3, Sdccag8, Hnrnpu, Trp53bp2, Iars2, Ptpn14 BW
FPW
Muscle Sft2d2, Dedd, Sdhc
Mrps14, Prrx1, Nme7, Mpzl1, Cd247, Lrrc52, Fcrla,
Adamts4, Pvrl4, Cd244, Slamf7, Igsf9, Tagln2
Chol
Tg

Near D11Mit132
Adipose tissue Ccl6, Rab5c, Atp6v0a1, Psmc3ip, Tubg1, Psme3, Dusp3, Grn, Nmt1, Plekhm1, Cdc27, Mrc2, Tanc2, Wipi1, Kpna2 Stat5b, Rdm1, Rprml, Helz BW
FPW
Muscle Prkar1a, Sgca, Spop, Krtap3-1 Fkbp10, Acly, Stat3, Vps25, Cntd1, Psme3, Ifi35, Brca1, Slc25a39, Gpatch8, Gm1564, Eftud2, Hexim2, Lyzl6, Wnt3, Crhr1, Arsg, Slfn10, Slfn3, Kal1, Lhx1, Ggnbp2, Usp32, Ptrh2, Dhx40, Rad51c, Msi2, Car10, Mbtd1, Mycbpap, Rsad1, Hils1, Zfp652, Ube2z, Calcoco2, Skap1, Scrn2, Kpnb1, Pip4k2b, Med1, Crkrs, Gsdma2, Wipf2, Krt12 Tg

Near D4Mit178
Adipose tissue Col15a1, Nipsnap3a, Svep1, Slc31a1, Orm1, Tnc, Megf9, Mpdz Rgs3, Orm3 BW
FPW
Muscle Mup4, Mup3, Zfp37, Orm2, Pappa, Dbc1, Cdk5rap2, Rasef Tg

Near D8Mit242
Adipose tissue Tmem208, Lypla3, Cyb5b, Hp, Mlkl, Cenpn, Gcsh, Cotl1, Gins2 Cirh1a, Ces3, Bbs2, Terf2ip, Fbxo31 BW
FPW
Muscle Cog8, Znrf1, Gse1 Cdh8, Cklf, Cmtm2a, Ccdc79, Lcat, Prmt7, Sntb2, Adat1, Terf2ip, Mon1b, Jph3, Cdt1, Zfp319, Gins3, Setd6 Tg

Near D3Mit304
Muscle Agtr1b, Tbl1xr1, Arpm1, Samd7, Cldn11, Slc7a14, Pik3ca, Ccdc39, Sox2 Tg
Adipose tissue Fabp5, Sirpb1, Aadacl1, Tpd52 Lrrcc1, Car3, Mynn, Phc3, Zfhx4 BW
FPW

Near D4Mit312
Muscle Nadk Eif4g3, Ubxd3, Pax7, Arhgef19, Tnfrsf8, Rex2, Clcn6, Fbxo6, Gpr153, Morn1, Gabrd, Ssu72, Ttll10, Dhdds, Lin28, Sepn1, Srrm1, Rcan3, Cnr2, Htr1 d, Ephb2, Ptafr, Eya3 Tg
Adipose tissue Efhd2, Lzic, Pgd, Plod1, Dnajc16, Necap2, Mfap2, Atp13a2, Igsf21, Capzb, Pla2g2e, Hspg2, C1qc, Ephb2, Clic4, Ldlrap1, Paqr7, Stmn1 Sdf4, Thap3, Per3, Park7, H6pd, Tmem201, Tardbp, Gale, Srrm1, Syf2, Tmem57 BW
FPW

Near D11Mit41
Adipose tissue Eif4a1, Atp6v0a1, Psmc3ip, Dusp3, Nmt1, Mpdu1, Cd68, Garnl4, Serpinf1, Slc43a2, Pitpna, Blmh, Pigs, Evi2a, Rhbdl3, Ccl2, Ccl7, Ccl9, Ccl6, Ccl3, Dynll2, Mmd, Lrrc59, Col1a1, Top2a Rdm1, Ssh2, Unc45b, Acaca, Ggnbp2, Med13, Vezf1,
Tmem100, Spop, Kpnb1, Erbb2, Thra,
BW
FPW
Muscle Sgca, Spop, Krtap3-1 Fkbp10, Acly, Cntd1, Ifi35, Lyzl6, Aurkb, Trp53, Alox12, Itgae, Phf12, Nek8, Spag5, Nos2, Rhot1, Zfp207, Fndc8, Slfn10, Slfn3, Kal1, Lhx1, Ggnbp2, Usp32, Ptrh2, Dhx40, Rad51c, Msi2, Car10, Mbtd1, Mycbpap, Rsad1, Hils1, Zfp652, Ube2z, Calcoco2, Skap1, Scrn2, Kpnb1, Pip4k2b, Crkrs, Gsdma2, Wipf2, Krt12 Tg

Near D1Mit215
Adipose tissue Slc11a1, Col6a3 Ikzf2, Usp37, Cyp27a1, Mogat1, Irs1 BW
FPW
Liver Igfbp2 FPW
Muscle Sumo1, Spag16, Tnp1, Vil1, Plcd4, Zfp142, Ttll4, Cyp27a1, Des, Epha4, Pax3, Mrpl44, Cops7b, Chrng Tg

Near D14Mit107
Adipose tissue Dock9 BW
FPW
Muscle Dock9, Dzip1, Oxgr1, Ipo5, Farp1, Fgf14, Tg

Genes located in physiological trait QTL intervals, showing correlations of the gene expression levels with physiological traits (P < 0.05) are detected by microarray and regression analyses using the subset of F2 mice (n = 16). Genes in bold are confirmed by qRT-PCR. BW, body weight; FPW, fat pad weight; Chol, cholesterol; Tg, triglyceride.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

We conducted qRT-PCR analysis for candidate genes obtained from the microarray data or literature search (Table 6). Gene expression levels of Ccdc46 in liver, Ctrc in pancreas, and Sirpb1 in adipose tissue were significantly up-regulated in TH mice compared with B6 mice. On the other hand, the level of gene expression of 1700009P17Rik was significantly down-regulated in liver from TH mice compared with B6 mice. The gene expression levels of Irs1, Mogat1, and Igfbp2 were significantly down-regulated in adipose tissue from TH mice compared with B6 mice.

Table 6.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR for selected genes in B6 and TH mice (males, 16 week, n = 5 each group).

Gene symbol Gene name Chr Near marker Trait Tissue Fold P
1700009P17Rik RIKEN cDNA 1700009P17 gene 1 D1Mit113 Tg
Chol
Liver 0.2 0.0007
Ccdc46 Coiled-coil domain containing 46 11 D11Mit132 Tg Liver 7 0.0019
Sirpb1a Signal-regulatory protein beta 1A 3 D3Mit304 Chol Adipose tissue 2.6 0.02
Ctrc Chymotrypsin C (caldecrin) 4 D4Mit312 Glu Pancreas 17 <0.0001
Igfbp2 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 1 D1Mit215 FPW Liver 0.50 0.05
Adipose tissue 0.1 <0.0001
Cyp27a1 Cytochrome P450, family 27, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 1 D1Mit215 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 1.2 0.10
Irs1 Insulin receptor substrate 1 1 D1Mit215 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 0.6 0.05
Mogat1 Monoacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 1 D1Mit215 FPW Adipose tissue 0.2 0.0002
Usp37 Ubiquitin specific peptidase 37 1 D1Mit215 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 1.0 0.90
Spag5 Sperm associated antigen 5 11 D11Mit41 Tg Muscle 1.02 0.95
Ccl9 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 11 D11Mit41 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 2.2 0.01
Ccl6 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 6 11 D11Mit41 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 1.4 0.20
Ccl3 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 11 D11Mit41 BW
FPW
Adipose tissue 5.5 <0.0001
Msi2 Musashi homolog 2 (Drosophila) 11 D11Mit41 Tg Muscle 1.03 0.75
Agtr1b Angiotensin II receptor, type 1b 3 D3Mit304 Tg Muscle 1.11 0.85
Pik3ca Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide 3 D3Mit304 Tg Muscle 0.91 0.24
Ccdc39 Coiled-coil domain containing 39 3 D3Mit304 Tg Muscle 0.66 0.40
Ccdc79 Coiled-coil domain containing 79 8 D8Mit242 Tg Muscle 0.59 0.40
Apoa2 Apolipoprotein A-II 1 D1Mit113 Tg
Chol
Liver 1.07 0.08
Insig2 Insulin induced gene 2 1 D1Mit113 Tg
Chol
Muscle 0.95 0.73
Zfp69 Zinc finger protein 69 4 D4Mit312 Glu Adipose tissue 2.2 0.03

Chr, chromosome; Fold, the fold change in TH vs. B6 (TH/B6); Tg, triglyceride; Chol, cholesterol; Glu, glucose; FPW, fat pad weight; BW, body weight.

Apolipoprotein A-II (Apoa2) gene in dyslipidemia in TH mice

Apoa2 gene maps to the distal region of mouse Chr 1, near the Chr 1 QTL linked to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia in the F2 mice. Through transgenic and knockout studies it has been shown that Apoa2 is involved in controlling plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels and over-expression causes insulin resistance and obesity [12-14]. In order to test if Apoa2 could be the Chr 1 hyperlipidemia QTL, we conducted sequence comparison of the coding region between TH and B6 mice. There were 7 nucleotide substitutions in the Apoa2 coding sequence, resulting in 3 amino acid differences in the two strains (Figure 5). The gene expression level of Apoa2 was not significantly different between TH and B6 mice in liver (Table 6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Apoa2 cDNA sequence comparison in TH and B6 strains.

Discussion

Through genome-wide linkage scans using an F2 intercross population from TH and B6 strains, we identified multiple QTLs and interacting loci linked to hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, and obesity phenotypes. Further, genetic study of gene expression in a subset of this F2 population led to potential candidate genes for the QTLs.

Some limitations of this study need to be recognized. First, marker spacing in this study was approximately 20-cM, which was at the lower end of the generally accepted marker density (10 - 25 cM) for QTL genome scans [15] and could cause underestimation of the number of QTLs identified in this study. However, it has been shown that the power of detecting a QTL is barely influenced by marker spacing in the range of 10 to 20 cM, with most (over 70%) of the power retained even at 50 cM spacing [16]. Therefore, it is unlikely that there are QTLs with stronger effect than were identified in our F2 cross. Fine mapping studies to further define the QTLs identified will provide further validation. Second, measurements of plasma glucose, lipid and insulin levels are sensitive to multiple environmental perturbations, such as animal husbandry, testing procedures, and environmental conditions. This creates phenotypic variation that may result in less power to detect the genetic determinants for physiological differences or inconsistency in detected QTLs across time. This may have caused the observed fluctuations in QTL locations over time. The third potential limitation was running microarray analysis on a small subset of F2 mice selected from the upper and lower tails of the frequency distribution of the plasma triglyceride levels without severe hyperglycemia. Populations with phenotypic extremes are known to be most genetically informative as genes influencing to the disease should be concentrated in the extremes of the populations. Thus, even with small number of mice, our data from multiple tissues did identify potential novel candidate genes that may be involved in pathogenic mechanisms in TH mice.

In mice, Apoa2b allele, characterized by Ala61-to-Val61 substitution, has been reported to be hypermorphic in increasing plasma cholesterol levels and appears in multiple mouse strains [17,18]. The same polymorphism of Apoa2 gene was revealed in TH strain, suggesting Apoa2 as the candidate gene underlying the Chr 1 QTL linked to hypercholesterolemia. Indeed, many cholesterol QTLs were previously detected in the Apoa2 region in separate genetic crosses of mice and Apoa2 was suggested as a likely candidate across the strains [19]. Functional studies related to Apoa2b allele in TH mice are warranted.

Unlike cholesterol, age-specific genetic loci were found for plasma triglyceride levels, suggesting that different genetic mechanisms are responsible for the onset versus progression of hypertriglyceridemia in TH mice. It is noteworthy that the Chr 1 locus linked to hypertriglyceridemia at 8 weeks of age overlapped the Chr 1 hypercholesterolemia QTL. It might be speculated that the onset of both hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia shares the same genetic factors, but distinct genetic mechanisms are involved in the progression of the disease in TH mice. This age-related genetic effect has been previously recognized and appreciated in complex traits including diabetes and obesity [20,21]. Data collection at multiple time points provides power to detect age-dependent effects that can be easily missed with a single time point study.

The Chr 11 and Chr 4 hypertriglyceridemia QTLs map near the loci previously observed for atherosclerosis in mice; Ath19 on Chr 11 [22,23] and Ath8 on Chr 4 [22,24]. The authors proposed the angiopoeitin-like protein 3 (Angptl3) gene, containing a coiled-coil domain, as a positional candidate gene for the Ath8 [24]. Interestingly, Angptl3-null mice show markedly low plasma triglyceride concentrations [25]. The Chr 8 hypertriglyceridemia QTL maps to the region of Tgl1 linked to serum triglyceride levels in KK/Ta × (BALB/c × KK/Ta) F1 backcross mice [26].

A major QTL for the hyperglycemic (diabetic) trait was identified on the distal region of Chr 4. Previously, several QTLs for diabetes and diabetes-related phenotypes have been mapped in this region in independent cohorts of mice and rats [27]. Among those, QTLs directly linked to plasma glucose levels included Nidd1 in F2 mice from NZO × NON, a locus near D4Mit203 in F2 mice from C57BL/KsJ × DBA/2, and Nidd/SJL in backcross mice from (NZO × SJL) × NZO.

Recently, the zinc finger protein 69 (Zfp69) gene was identified as a candidate for the diabetes QTL of Nidd/SJL [28]. An allelic variation of Zfp69 was observed in multiple inbred strains; allele carried by B6 and NZO strains causing truncated mRNA was associated with reduced diabetes susceptibility, while allele carried by SJL and NON strains producing normal mRNA was diabetogenic [28]. It is possible that the TH strain, which is close to Swiss family strains http://jaxmice.jax.org/strain/005314.html, may carry the SJL allele of Zfp69. This notion is possibly supported by the observed higher gene expression of Zfp69 in TH mice compared to B6 mice (Table 6).

Body weight is a compound trait reflecting the weights of lean muscle and bones as well as fat mass. A QTL near D11Mit41 on Chr 11 was very significantly linked to body weight (Table 2). This locus was also associated with carcass weight, suggesting its major effect on lean mass. Among multiple body weight-related QTLs mapped to this Chr 11 interval [29], the Wg4 (also known as Q11Ucd1) locus behaves similarly to the Chr 11 body weight QTL, affecting growth rate and carcass lean mass in hg/hg F2 population from a cross of B6-hg/hg x CAST/EiJ [30].

A major QTL near D1Mit215 on Chr 1 was linked to all the fat pad weights and body weights at 24 weeks of age. This chromosomal interval contains Nob3, significantly linked to adiposity (defined as body weight and body fat) in F2 progeny from NZO and B6 mice [31]. Several other QTLs associated with body weights were identified in this interval in mice, namely W3q12 and W10q6 [32] and Bwtq1 [33]. The human orthologous region of the Chr 1 QTL is 2q33-37. Based on known functional relationship to metabolism, a few genes mapped in this region, including Irs1, Mogat1 and Igfbp2, are considered as candidates.

Obesity has been known to be a low-grade chronic inflammatory disease [34]. In this study, we observed that the gene expression levels of multiple chemokines, including Ccl9 and Ccl3, were significantly increased in adipose tissue of TH mice compared to B6 mice. The gene expression levels of these genes were also positively correlated with body and fat pad weights in the F2 mice (Table 5).

Previous research found genetic determinants of diabetes and obesity in TH mice in backcross population from F1(B6 × TH) × TH, including diabetes QTLs on Chr 19 (Tanidd1) and Chr 13 (Tanidd2) and obesity QTLs on Chr 7 (Tabw), Chr 4 (Tafat) and Chr 6 (Tabw2) [5,35]. Two loci on Chr 18 and 16 interacted with Tanidd1 and Tanidd2, respectively. These QTLs were not detected in the present F2 study. This discrepancy is not totally surprising. As the detection of a QTL is subject to the magnitude of phenotypic variation within genotypes, QTL results in an F2 and a backcross population from the same progenitors can be different [36]. For example, when complete dominance exists for the TH allele of a QTL, the power of a backcross [F1(B6 × TH) × TH] for detecting this QTL is zero. Similarly, QTL interaction effects could be affected by the choice of an F2 or backcross, in part, due to the absence of homozygous mice for B6 alleles in the backcross. Another source of the discrepancy in results from the two studies could be the different physiological conditions of the mice. Non-fasting plasma glucose levels were measured in the backcross study, while 4-hour fasting plasma glucose levels were used in the present F2 study. Therefore, the present findings using F2 population should be taken as additional genetic information underlying the pathogenic mechanisms in TH mice, not just an independent replication.

Conclusions

In summary, using ~380 male F2 mice from the B6 × TH intercross we detected 12 significant QTLs; 4 for hypertriglyceridemia, 2 for hypercholesterolemia, 1 for hyperglycemia, 2 for body weights, 1 for fat pad weights, and 2 for carcass weights. Polymorphisms in Apoa2 gene are suggested to be responsible for the Chr 1 QTL linked to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Gene expression analysis added novel aspects and aided the selection of candidates and biological mechanisms for the QTLs. Future studies to define the molecular bases of these QTLs will improve the understanding of genetic contributions in diabetes related syndrome in TH mice and ultimately in humans.

Methods

Animals

Mice were maintained on standard rodent chow with 4% fat [Harlan Teklad Rodent Diet (W) 8604, Madison, WI] ad libitum with free access to water (HCl acidified, pH 2.8-3.2) under controlled temperature and humidity with a 12-hour light and dark cycle. All animal studies were carried out with the approvals of The University of Tennessee Animal Care and Use Committee and Marshall University Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation.

Genetic crosses

Male TH mice were mated to female B6 mice. The resulting F1 hybrid mice were interbred to produce an F2 population. Male F2 mice were fasted for 4 hours at the beginning of the light cycle (6:00-7:00 AM) and blood was collected via the retro-orbital plexus using a heparinized microcapillary tube at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of age. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation (1,200 g) at 4°C and plasma levels of glucose, true triglyceride, total cholesterol, and insulin and body weights were measured. At the end of the study, mice were killed and tissues including liver, skeletal muscle, pancreas, and adipose tissue (inguinal, epididymal, mesenteric, retroperitoneal including perirenal, and subscapular fat pads) were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for RNA isolation. Respective fat pad weight and carcass weight (body weight without the five fat pads) were also recorded during the dissection.

Plasma glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and insulin levels

Plasma levels of glucose (TR15103/1530-500, Thermo Electron, Louisville, CO), total cholesterol (TR13421, Thermo Electron, Louisville, CO), and free and total glycerol (337, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were determined using commercial colorimetric assays. Plasma true triglyceride concentrations were estimated by subtraction of free glycerol from total glycerol. Plasma insulin levels were determined using RIA (RI-13K, Linco Research, St. Charles, MO).

Genotyping by PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from tail tips using proteinase K [37] and two series of salt precipitation steps. The DNA was PCR amplified using SSLP primers (Additional file 1 Table S1) purchased (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) or synthesized (Sigma) based on sequences from Mouse Genome Informatics http://www.informatics.jax.org/javawi2/servlet/WIFetch?page=markerQF. The thermal cycle consisted of 95°C for 2 min, followed by 49 cycles of 94°C (20 sec), 50°C (30 sec) and 72°C (40 sec) and a final extension at 72°C (7 min). Amplified products were electrophoretically separated on 3% metaphor (50184, FMC, Rockland, ME)/1% agarose (0710-500G, Amresco, Solon, OH) gels in 0.5 × tris-borate-EDTA buffer, pH 7.4. The DNA was visualized by ethidium bromide (E-1510, Sigma) staining.

RNA isolation

Total RNA was isolated from liver, muscle (combined soleus and gastrocnemius), pancreas, and adipose tissue (combined inguinal, epididymal, retroperitoneal, perirenal, and subscapular fat pads) using RNeasy Lipid Tissue Midi Kit (75842, QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For adipose tissue, muscle and pancreas, the entire tissue was homogenized and total RNA extracted, whereas approximately 50% of the liver was homogenized. Total RNA was further purified using RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (74204, QIAGEN) for microarray analysis.

Microarray Analysis

Hybridizations were performed at the University of Tennessee Affymetrix Facility (Knoxville, TN) using Affymetrix GeneChip® Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) following the standard protocol. The Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array contains 45,000 probe sets on a single array to analyze the expression level of over 39,000 transcripts and variants from over 34,000 well-characterized mouse genes (Affymetrix). Total RNA isolated from adipose tissue, liver, muscle, and pancreas of a subset of F2 mice (n = 16) were used for microarray analysis, requiring 64 arrays. The 16 mice were chosen from the upper and lower tails (8 each) for plasma triglyceride distribution of all the male F2 mice, excluding overtly diabetic mice. The phenotypic values of these mice are presented in Table 1.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from adipose tissue, liver, muscle, and pancreas of B6 and TH male mice at 16 weeks of age as described above. Total RNA (2 μg) was reverse-transcribed with SUPERSCRIPT RT (11904-018, Invitrogen) using oligo d(T)12-18 (18418-012, Invitrogen) as primer to synthesize first-strand cDNA in 20-μl volume according to manufacturer's instructions. The primers used for the real-time PCR were proprietary for Ctrc (PPM39932A), 1700009P17Rik (PPM27997A), Sirpb1a (PPM39258A), Irs1 (PPM05117E), Cyp27a1 (PPM30124A), Mogat1 (PPM28787E), Usp37 (PPM60128A), Zfp69 (PPM40990E), Insig2 (PPM26980A), Pik3ca (PPM05112A), Agtr1b (PPM31347B), Ccdc79 (PPM35025A), Ccdc39 (PPM28741A), and Apoa2 (PPM05347B) (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD). Oligonucleotide primers were also synthesized (Sigma) using sequences obtained from Primer Bank http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank for Ccdc46, Igfbp2, Ccl3, Ccl9, Ccl6, Msi2, and Spag5 and from the published literature for 36B4 [38] (Table 7).

Table 7.

Primer sequences for real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

Gene Forward Primer (5' - 3') Reverse Primer (5' - 3')
Ccdc46 GCTGAGACCGAGATGACTCTG GCACTTCGCACCTGATGAGA
Igfbp2 CAGACGCTACGCTGCTATCC CCCTCAGAGTGGTCGTCATCA
Ccl3 TTCTCTGTACCATGACACTCTGC CGTGGAATCTTCCGGCTGTAG
Ccl9 CCCTCTCCTTCCTCATTCTTACA AGTCTTGAAAGCCCATGTGAAA
Ccl6 GCTGGCCTCATACAAGAAATGG GCTTAGGCACCTCTGAACTCTC
Msi2 GACCTGTCGCCGATCTCTAC GCGCTTATGTAATTCCCCACTC
Spag5 ACAGTGAGTCTGAGTTCTGCC CTGTGAGTTTCTTGGTGAGTTCT
36B4 GAGGAATCAGATGAGGATATGGGA AAGCAGGCTGACTTGGTTGC

The real-time PCR reaction was carried out in a 25-μl volume in 1× SYBR Green PCR core reagents (PA-112, SABiosciences) containing 1 μl cDNA template diluate (1:5, v/v) and 6 pmol primers using ABI Prism 7700 or 7300 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For each sample, triplicate amplifications were performed and the average measurements used for data analysis.

RT-PCR and sequencing of the Apoa2 gene

Total RNA was extracted from pancreas of B6 and TH mice and the RNA (10 μg) was reverse-transcribed as described above. The single-strand cDNA was diluted with water (1:5, v/v), and 2 μl of the diluate was used to amplify Apoa2 cDNA using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Full length coding sequence was amplified using Apoa2 specific primers F1 (5'-AGAATCGCAGCACTGTTCC-3') and R1 (5'-GGAGAAAACAGGCAGAAGG-3') derived from Mus Musculus Apoa2 gene mRNA sequences (NM_013474). PCR products were first electrophoresed on a 1.2 % agarose gel. Bands of interest were excised from the gel, and DNA fragments were isolated (K3051-2, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). The gel-purified PCR products were directly sequenced with primers originally used to amplify the PCR products. Sequencing was carried out automatically with fluorescent tags (3100 Genetic Analyzers, Applied Biosystems).

Statistical Analysis

QTL mapping

QTL analysis was run using R/QTL [39] with composite interval mapping at default settings. Traits that showed positive skew were log transformed. The estimated map showed expansion compared to published marker locations, so the estimated map was used. This had the benefit of resolving putative genotyping errors on Chr 4. Genome wide significance thresholds were established by identifying the 10th (suggestive), 5th (significant) and 1st (very significant) percentiles from 10,000 permutations.

Microarray data analysis

Individual probe data were extracted using Bioconductor http://www.bioconductor.org, and the gcRMA (robust multi-array) process used to produce a signal measure for each gene. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software (Cary, NC). A mixed ANOVA model [40] was run on the normalized data, fitting genotype and tissue treatment effects, and using array variation as the experimental error. Genes with significant (P < 0.05) ANOVA interaction, and significant pair-wise False Discovery Rate [41] were considered differentially expressed. Microarray expression data were also tested for relationship to phenotypes using correlation analysis in SAS [11]. A total of 45,000 probes * 39 phenotypes = 1.75 million regressions were run for each tissue. Similarly, analysis of variance in SAS was conducted to identify associations between markers and gene expression in each tissue, comparing marker genotypes for differences in mean expression at all microarray probes. P-values from both analyses were protected at a 5% False Discovery Rate. Microarray data have been submitted to the gene expression omnibus http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ under the accession number GSE24637.

Real-time qRT-PCR data analysis

Triplicate threshold cycle times were averaged for each mouse, and strain differences tested using a one-way ANOVA in SAS software (Cary, NC), with the 36B4 control gene values as a covariate to avoid analysis of ratios. Data are presented as relative fold-change using B6 mice as the reference by 2(ΔCt of TH mice - ΔCt of B6 mice) [42], where ΔCt represents the treatment mean from ANOVA.

Physiological data analysis

Data analysis was conducted by ANOVA with StatView 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Authors' contributions

TPS did phenotyping and genotyping of F2 mice and was in charge for all aspects of animal care. HYK did microarray analysis. AMS conducted statistical analysis of the genetic and genomic data. JHK conceived the study and was primarily responsible for its coordination and design and did qRT-PCR and sequencing analysis. AMS and JHK drafted the manuscript, tables and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Table S1 - Simple sequence length polymorphic markers for the genome-wide scans of the (B6 × TH) F2 mice. The file contains the list of genetic markers and their estimated genetic map positions used in this study.

Click here for file (67.5KB, PDF)

Contributor Information

Taryn P Stewart, Email: stewartta@marshall.edu.

Hyoung Yon Kim, Email: dabi25kim@hotmail.com.

Arnold M Saxton, Email: asaxton@utk.edu.

Jung Han Kim, Email: kimj@marshall.edu.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by American Diabetes Association Grant 7-04-RA-52 and in part by American Heart Association Grant 0855300E, NIH/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease Grant R01DK077202, and feasibility grant from the University of Tennessee Obesity Research Center to JHK. Marshall University Genomics Core Facility is supported through the NCRR WV-INBRE Grant RR016477 and COBRE Grant RR020180.

References

  1. Romao I, Roth J. Genetic and environmental interactions in obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:S24–S28. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tomkin GH. Targets for intervention in dyslipidemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(Suppl 2):S241–S248. doi: 10.2337/dc08-s260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pearson ER. Recent advances in the genetics of diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2008;2:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ridderstråle M, Groop L. Genetic dissection of type 2 diabetes. Mol Cell Endorinol. 2009;297:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim JH, Sen S, Avery CS, Simpson E, Chandler P, Nishina PM, Churchill GA, Naggert JK. Genetic analysis of a new mouse model for non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Genomics. 2001;74:273–286. doi: 10.1006/geno.2001.6569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim JH, Stewart TP, Soltani-Bejnood M, Wang L, Fortuna JM, Mostafa OA, Moustaid-Moussa N, Shoieb AM, McEntee MF, Wang Y, Bechtel L, Naggert JK. Phenotypic characterization of polygenic type 2 diabetes in TALLYHO/JngJ mice. J Endocrinol. 2006;191:437–446. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Y, Nishina PM, Naggert JK. Degradation of IRS1 leads to impaired glucose uptake in adipose tissue of the type 2 diabetes mouse model TALLYHO/Jng. J Endocrinol. 2009;203:65–74. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Didion SP, Lynch CM, Faraci FM. Cerebral vascular dysfunction in TallyHo mice: a new model of Type II diabetes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H1579–H1583. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00939.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng ZJ, Jiang YF, Ding H, Severson D, Triggle CR. Vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetic TallyHo mice: role for an increase in the contribution of PGH2/TxA2 receptor activation and cytochrome p450 products. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;85:404–412. doi: 10.1139/Y07-010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drake TA, Schadt EE, Lusis AJ. Integrating genetic and gene expression data: application to cardiovascular and metabolic traits in mice. Mamm Genome. 2006;17:466–479. doi: 10.1007/s00335-005-0175-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doss S, Schadt EE, Drake TA, Lusis AJ. Cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci in mice. Genome Res. 2005;15:681–691. doi: 10.1101/gr.3216905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Warden CH, Hedrick CC, Qiao JH, Castellani LW, Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis in transgenic mice overexpressing apolipoprotein A-II. Science. 1993;261:469–472. doi: 10.1126/science.8332912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schultz JR, Verstuyft JG, Gong EL, Nichols AV, Rubin EM. Protein composition determines the anti-atherogenic properties of HDL in transgenic mice. Nature. 1993;365:762–764. doi: 10.1038/365762a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Castellani LW, Goto AM, Lusis AJ. Studies with apolipoprotein A-II transgenic mice indicate a role for HDLs in adiposity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2001;50:643–651. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.3.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore KJ, Nagle DL. Complex trait analysis in the mouse: The strengths, the limitations and the promise yet to come. Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:653–686. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller JI, Soller M. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics. 1993;134:943–951. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang X, Korstanje R, Higgins D, Paigen B. Haplotype analysis in multiple crosses to identify a QTL gene. Genome Res. 2004;14:1767–1772. doi: 10.1101/gr.2668204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitagawa K, Wang J, Mastushita T, Kogishi K, Hosokawa M, Fu X, Guo Z, Mori M, Higuchi K. Polymorphisms of mouse apolipoprotein A-II: seven alleles found among 41 inbred strains of mice. Amyloid. 2003;10:207–214. doi: 10.3109/13506120309041737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Suto J, Takahashi Y, Sekikawa K. Quantitative trait locus analysis of plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels in C57BL/6J × RR F2 mice. Biochem Genet. 2004;42:347–363. doi: 10.1023/B:BIGI.0000039809.40228.d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nobrega MA, Solberg Woods LC, Fleming S, Jacob HJ. Distinct genetic regulation of progression of diabetes and renal disease in the Goto-Kakizaki rat. Physiol Genomics. 2009;39:38–46. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90389.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lasky-Su J, Lyon HN, Emilsson V, Heid IM, Molony C, Raby BA, Lazarus R, Klanderman B, Soto-Quiros ME, Avila L, Silverman EK, Thorleifsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kronenberg F, Vollmert C, Illig T, Fox CS, Levy D, Laird N, Ding X, McQueen MB, Butler J, Ardlie K, Papoutsakis C, Dedoussis G, O'Donnell CJ, Wichmann HE, Celedón JC, Schadt E, Hirschhorn J, Weiss ST, Stefansson K, Lange C. On the replication of genetic associations: timing can be everything! Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:849–858. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang SS, Schadt EE, Wang H, Wang X, Ingram-Drake L, Shi W, Drake TA, Lusis AJ. Identification of pathways for atherosclerosis in mice: integration of quantitative trait locus analysis and global gene expression data. Circ Res. 2007;101:e11–30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.152975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishimori N, Li R, Kelmenson PM, Korstanje R, Walsh KA, Churchill GA, Forsman-Semb K, Paigen B. Quantitative trait loci analysis for plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations and atherosclerosis susceptibility between inbred mouse strains C57BL/6J and 129S1/SvImJ. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:161–166. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000104027.52895.D7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Korstanje R, Eriksson P, Samnegård A, Olsson PG, Forsman-Semb K, Sen S, Churchill GA, Rollins J, Harris S, Hamsten A, Paigen B. Locating Ath8, a locus for murine atherosclerosis susceptibility and testing several of its candidate genes in mice and humans. Atherosclerosis. 2004;177:443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujimoto K, Koishi R, Shimizugawa T, Ando Y. Angptl3-null mice show low plasma lipid concentrations by enhanced lipoprotein lipase activity. Exp Anim. 2006;55:27–34. doi: 10.1538/expanim.55.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shike T, Hirose S, Kobayashi M, Funabiki K, Shirai T, Tomino Y. Susceptibility and negative epistatic loci contributing to type 2 diabetes and related phenotypes in a KK/Ta mouse model. Diabetes. 2001;50:1943–1948. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schmidt C, Gonzaludo NP, Strunk S, Dahm S, Schuchhardt J, Kleinjung F, Wuschke S, Joost HG, Al-Hasani H. A meta-analysis of QTL for diabetes-related traits in rodents. Physiol Genomics. 2008;34:42–53. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00267.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scherneck S, Nestler M, Vogel H, Blüher M, Block MD, Diaz MB, Herzig S, Schulz N, Teichert M, Tischer S, Al-Hasani H, Kluge R, Schürmann A, Joost HG. Positional cloning of zinc finger domain transcription factor Zfp69, a candidate gene for obesity-associated diabetes contributed by mouse locus Nidd/SJL. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wuschke S, Dahm S, Schmidt C, Joost HG, Al-Hasani H. A meta-analysis of quantitative trait loci associated with body weight and adiposity in mice. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:829–841. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Corva PM, Horvat S, Medrano JF. Quantitative trait loci affecting growth in high growth (hg) mice. Mamm Genome. 2001;12:284–290. doi: 10.1007/s003350010275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vogel H, Nestler M, Rüschendorf F, Block MD, Tischer S, Kluge R, Schürmann A, Joost HG, Scherneck S. Characterization of Nob3, a major quantitative trait locus for obesity and hyperglycemia on mouse chromosome 1. Physiol Genomics. 2009;38:226–232. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00011.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rocha JL, Eisen EJ, Van Vleck LD, Pomp D. A large-sample QTL study in mice: I. Growth. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:83–99. doi: 10.1007/s00335-003-2312-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Morris KH, Ishikawa A, Keightley PD. Quantitative trait loci for growth traits in C57BL/6J × DBA/2J mice. Mamm Genome. 1999;10:225–228. doi: 10.1007/s003359900977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huber J, Kiefer FW, Zeyda M, Ludvik B, Silberhumer GR, Prager G, Zlabinger GJ, Stulnig TM. CC chemokine and CC chemokine receptor profiles in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue are altered in human obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3215–3221. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim JH, Stewart TP, Zhang W, Kim HY, Nishina PM, Naggert JK. Type 2 diabetes mouse model TallyHo carries an obesity gene on chromosome 6 that exaggerates dietary obesity. Physiol Genomics. 2005;22:171–181. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00197.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Darvasi A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet. 1998;18:19–24. doi: 10.1038/ng0198-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Strauss WM. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1998. Preparation of genomic DNA from mammalian tissue; pp. 2.2.1–2.2.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dalen KT, Ulven SM, Bamberg K, Gustafsson JA, Nebb HI. Expression of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter GLUT4 in adipocytes is dependent on liver × receptor alpha. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:48283–48291. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302287200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:889–890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wolfinger RD, Gibson G, Wolfinger E, Bennett L, Hamadeh H, Bushel P, Afshari C, Paules RS. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J Comput Biol. 2001;8:625–637. doi: 10.1089/106652701753307520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:368–375. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btf877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

Table S1 - Simple sequence length polymorphic markers for the genome-wide scans of the (B6 × TH) F2 mice. The file contains the list of genetic markers and their estimated genetic map positions used in this study.

Click here for file (67.5KB, PDF)

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES