Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1973 Mar;52(3):592–598. doi: 10.1172/JCI107220

Chemotherapy of Experimental Streptococcal Endocarditis. I. COMPARISON OF COMMONLY RECOMMENDED PROPHYLACTIC REGIMENS

David T Durack 1, Robert G Petersdorf 1
PMCID: PMC302297  PMID: 4685083

Abstract

The effectiveness of various antibiotics commonly recommended for the prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis has been evaluated in experimental streptococcal endocarditis in rabbits. High doses of penicillin G did not prevent the development of this infection. The only consistently successful prophylactic regimens using penicillin alone were those which provided for both an early high serum level and more than 9 h of effective antimicrobial action. Vancomycin was the only other drug which proved uniformly successful when given alone, even though the duration of its antimicrobial action in the blood was only 3 h. However, combined therapy using penicillin G or ampicillin with streptomycin was always effective in prophylaxis. Treatment with single injections of ampicillin, cephaloridine, cephalexin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, streptomycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline failed to prevent infection.

The findings provide information on the effect of antimicrobials in vivo and may be applicable to the chemoprophylaxis of infective endocarditis in clinical practice.

Full text

PDF
592

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CATES J. E., CHRISTIE R. V., GARROD L. P. Penicillin-resistant subacute bacterial endocarditis treated by a combination of penicillin and streptomycin. Br Med J. 1951 Mar 31;1(4708):653–656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4708.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis J. M., Moss A. J., Schenk E. A. Tricuspid candida endocarditis complicating a permanently implanted transvenous pacemaker. Am Heart J. 1969 Jun;77(6):818–821. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(69)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Detmer D. E., Morrow A. G., Marsh H. H., 3rd, Braunwald N. S. Experimental endocarditis following cardiac valve replacement. Evaluation of cloth-covered valves and the role of antibiotics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1970 Jul;60(1):46–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Durack D. T., Beeson P. B. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. I. Colonization of a sterile vegetation. Br J Exp Pathol. 1972 Feb;53(1):44–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durack D. T., Beeson P. B. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. II. Survival of a bacteria in endocardial vegetations. Br J Exp Pathol. 1972 Feb;53(1):50–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GARROD L. P., WATERWORTH P. M. The risks of dental extraction during penicillin treatment. Br Heart J. 1962 Jan;24:39–46. doi: 10.1136/hrt.24.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GUNNISON J. B., FRAHER M. A., JAWETZ E. PERSISTENCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN PENICILLIN IN VITRO. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 May;35:335–349. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-2-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garrison P. K., Freedman L. R. Experimental endocarditis I. Staphylococcal endocarditis in rabbits resulting from placement of a polyethylene catheter in the right side of the heart. Yale J Biol Med. 1970 Jun;42(6):394–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HIGHMAN B., ROSHE J., ALTLAND P. D. Production of endocarditis with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mitis in dogs with aortic insufficiency. Circ Res. 1956 May;4(3):250–256. doi: 10.1161/01.res.4.3.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOOK E. W., KAYE D. Prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis. J Chronic Dis. 1962 Jun;15:635–646. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(62)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones J. E. The experimental production of streptococcal endocarditis in the pig. J Pathol. 1969 Dec;99(4):307–318. doi: 10.1002/path.1710990406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Khairat O. An effective antibiotic cover for the prevention of endocarditis following dental and other post-operative bacteraemias. J Clin Pathol. 1966 Nov;19(6):561–566. doi: 10.1136/jcp.19.6.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macneal W. J., Spence M. J., Wasseen M. Experimental production of endocarditis lenta. Am J Pathol. 1939 Nov;15(6):695–706.3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phillips I. Clinical uses and control of rifampicin and clindamycin. J Clin Pathol. 1971 Jul;24(5):410–418. doi: 10.1136/jcp.24.5.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quinn E. L. Bacterial endocarditis. Postgrad Med. 1968 Sep;44(3):82–87. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1968.11693381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz I. S., Pervez N. Bacterial endocarditis associated with a permanent transvenous cardiac pacemaker. JAMA. 1971 Nov 1;218(5):736–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Silver W., DeGuzman A., Joos H. A., Garzon A. A. Intracardiac catheter as a foreign body of six years' duration resulting in endocarditis. Chest. 1971 Mar;59(3):344–346. doi: 10.1378/chest.59.3.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tozer R. A., Boutflower S., Gillespie W. A. Antibiotics for prevention of bacterial endocarditis during dental treatment. Lancet. 1966 Mar 26;1(7439):686–688. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)91629-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis: past, present and future. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1972 Jan;6(2):161–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wellmann K. F., Reinhard A., Salazar E. P. Polyethylene catheter embolism. Review of the literature and report of a case with associated fatal tricuspid and systemic candidiasis. Circulation. 1968 Mar;37(3):380–392. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.37.3.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES