Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Chem. 2010 Oct 20;39(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2010.10.001

Crystal Structures of Native and Inactivated cis-3-Chloroacrylic Acid Dehalogenase: Implications for the Catalytic and Inactivation Mechanisms

Youzhong Guo 1,a, Hector Serrano 1,a, William H Johnson Jr 1,a, Stephen Ernst 1,b, Marvin L Hackert 1,b,*, Christian P Whitman 1,a,*
PMCID: PMC3025062  NIHMSID: NIHMS253197  PMID: 21074239

Abstract

The isomeric mixture of cis- and trans-1,3-dichloropropene constitutes the active component of a widely used nematocide known as Telone II®. The mixture is processed by various soil bacteria to acetaldehyde through the 1,3-dichloropropene catabolic pathway. The pathway relies on an isomer-specific hydrolytic dehalogenation reaction catalyzed by cis- or trans-3-chloroacrylic acid dehalogenase, known respectively as cis-CaaD and CaaD. Previous sequence analysis and crystallographic studies of the native and covalently modified enzymes identified Pro-1, His-28, Arg-70, Arg-73, Tyr-103, and Glu-114 as key binding and catalytic residues in cis-CaaD. Mutagenesis of these residues confirmed their importance to the dehalogenation reaction. Crystal structures of the native enzyme (2.01 Å resolution) and the enzyme covalently modified at the Pro-1 nitrogen by 2-hydroxypropanoate (1.65 Å resolution) are reported here. Both structures are at a resolution higher than previously reported (2.75 Å and 2.1 Å resolution, respectively). The conformation of the covalent adduct is strikingly different from that previously reported due to its interaction with a 7-residue loop (Thr-32 to Leu-38). The participation of another active site residue, Arg-117, in catalysis and inactivation was also examined. The implications of the combined findings for the mechanisms of catalysis and inactivation are discussed.

Keywords: tautomerase superfamily, catalytic proline, dehalogenase, β–α–β motif, epoxide

1. Introduction

The pollution of the environment by synthetic halogenated organic compounds is the bane of the industrial age [1]. Many compounds, from commercial sources and agricultural applications, are hazardous due to their toxicity and persistence [2]. The repeated exposure of soil bacteria to these compounds may have precipitated the evolution of catabolic pathways for their degradation [35]. These pathways are rich in enzyme chemistry, structural diversity, evolutionary puzzles, and have the potential to rid the environment of hazardous compounds [5,6].

Telone II®, a widely used nematocide composed of cis- and trans-1,3-dichloropropene (1, Scheme 1), is degraded by one such pathway [7]. The compounds are converted to acetaldehyde, HCl, and CO2 in five enzyme-catalyzed steps (Scheme 1). Acetaldehyde is presumably channeled into the Krebs Cycle. In the course of this bacterial catabolic pathway, cis- and trans-3-chloroacrylic acid (2 and 3) are generated and processed to malonate semialdehyde (4) by separate dehalogenases, known respectively as cis- and trans-3-chloroacrylic acid dehalogenase (designated cis-CaaD1 and CaaD) [710].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The mechanisms and structures of both enzymes have been extensively studied. The two enzymes represent separate families in the tautomerase superfamily, whose members are characterized by a β–α–β building block and a catalytic amino-terminal proline [1114]. CaaD functions as a heterohexamer made up of three α- and three β-chains, where the catalytic unit is the α,β-heterodimer [15]. In contrast, cis-CaaD is a homotrimer where each polypeptide chain is a fusion product of the α– and β-like chains of CaaD [16]. The enzymes share 4 common residues, Pro-1 (βPro-1 in CaaD), a pair of arginines (αArg-8/αArg-11 in CaaD and Arg-70/Arg-73 in cis-CaaD), and a glutamate (αGlu-52 in CaaD and Glu-114 in cis-CaaD) [79,15,16]. His-28 and Tyr-103 assist in cis-CaaD catalysis, but have no known counterparts in CaaD [16]. In one proposed mechanism (Scheme 2), the glutamate residue activates a water molecule for nucleophilic attack at C-3 (assisted by Tyr-103 in cis-CaaD), the arginine pair binds and polarizes the substrate by interactions with the C-1 carboxylate group (assisted by His-28 in cis-CaaD), and Pro-1 completes the addition of water by providing a proton at C-2 [1416].

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

The initial studies of CaaD and cis-CaaD suggested largely parallel mechanisms [9,10]. However, as more details about the cis-CaaD mechanism emerge, it has become apparent that this is not the case. For example, two additional residues (Tyr-103 and His-28) are involved in cis-CaaD catalysis [16]. It is also not entirely clear in both enzymes how the catalytic residues interact with the substrate (and each other) as their roles have been largely defined by their positions in crystal structures. For these reasons, we continue to carry out kinetic studies of site-directed mutants coupled with additional crystal structures to better understand the catalytic details.

We report here high resolution crystal structures of both native (2.01 Å resolution) and cis-CaaD inactivated by the ring-opened product of (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate (6) (1.65 Å resolution). The native structure is much like that of the previously published one with two differences: water molecules are observed in the active site and the C-terminus (residues 118-149) is unstructured [16]. In both structures, a 7-residue loop (Thr-32-Leu-38) is in a conformation defined as the open state. In contrast, the inactivated cis-CaaD structure shows a notable difference in the active site because the 2-hydroxypropanoate adduct is in a different conformation. The adduct interacts with residues of the 7-residue loop and places the loop in a different conformation defined as the closed state. Finally, we determined that the R117A mutant has diminished activity but is still inactivated by the (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate. Hence, this active site residue may place a role in catalysis, but not a significant one. The combined findings further delineate the catalytic mechanism of cis-CaaD as well as its inactivation by epoxide 6.

graphic file with name nihms253197u1.jpg

2. Materials and methods

Materials

The sources for the components of Luria-Bertani (LB) media as well as the enzymes and reagents used in the molecular biology procedures are reported elsewhere [9,17]. The Amicon concentrator and the YM10 ultrafiltration membranes were obtained from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA). Pre-packed PD-10 Sephadex G-25 columns were purchased from Biosciences AB (Uppsala, Sweden). The QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit was acquired from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Oligonucleotides for DNA amplification and sequencing were synthesized by Genosys (The Woodlands, TX). The synthesis of (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate (6) is reported elsewhere [18].

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

E. coli strain BL21-Gold(DE3) was obtained from Stratagene. The pET3b expression vector (Stratagene) was used for the expression of the R117A mutant gene. The E. coli strains were grown at 30 °C in LB medium, supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/mL).

General Methods

General procedures for cloning and DNA manipulation were performed as described elsewhere [19]. The polymerase chain reaction was carried out in a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermocycler Model 480 obtained from Perkin Elmer Inc. (Wellesley, MA). DNA sequencing was performed by the DNA Core Facility in the Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology at The University of Texas at Austin. cis-CaaD and the R117A mutant were purified to homogeneity, as assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), according to a published procedure [10]. Protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE on gels containing 15% polyacrylamide [20]. The gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Waddell [21]. Absorbance data were obtained on a Hewlett Packard 8452A Diode Array spectrophotometer.

Crystallization and Structure Determination of Native cis-CaaD

Crystals of native cis-CaaD were obtained at room temperature from 6-μL hanging drops consisting of equal amounts of precipitant solution [0.8 M (NH4)2SO4 in 0.1 M BICINE buffer at pH 9.0] and protein solution (14 mg/mL cis-CaaD in 10 mM Tris-SO4 buffer at pH 8.0). Crystals grew to about 1 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm within one week. Diffraction data to 2.0 Å resolution (360 images at 0.5 degrees each) were collected using a Rigaku RU200H rotating anode X-ray source with Cu Kα radiation and equipped with a R-AXIS IV++ image plate detector with a crystal-to-detector distance of 150 mm. The data were integrated and scaled using the HKL-2000 program package [22]. The crystal belongs to the space group P63 with cell parameters a = 58.99 and c = 58.30 Å. The asymmetric unit contains one monomer with 149 amino acid residues corresponding to a calculated Matthews’ coefficient of 1.79 Å3/Da and a solvent content of 31% [23]. Residues 118-149 were not resolved in the electron density map.

Molecular replacement solutions were obtained with the server CASPR available online [24]. A search model was constructed from the atomic coordinates of cis-CaaD (PDB code: 2FLT). Rotation and translation functions were calculated using data between 15- and 3-Å resolution, yielding the position and orientation of the one monomer in the asymmetric unit [25]. Refinement of the solution by AMORE gave a correlation coefficient of 0.77 and an initial R-factor of 0.31 [26]. After automatic CNS refinement, the new set of coordinates resulted in R-test of 0.261 and an R-work of 0.214. After several more cycles of refinement with CNS and REFMAC5, manual model building with the program O [2729], and the addition of water molecules, a final structural model was obtained. A summary of the refinement statistics and geometric quality of the model is given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Data collection and refinement statistics

Native cis-CaaD Inactivated cis-CaaD
Data Statistics
Space group P63 I23
No. Chains/Asymmetric unit 1 1
Unit cell (Å) a=b=58.99 c=58.30 a=b=c=96.78
Resolution (Å) 2.01 1.65
Rsym (%) overall (outer shell) 6.0 (14.0) 7.0 (25.0)
Completeness (%) overall (outer shell) 98.3 (84.6) 98.2 (99.9)
I/σ (outer shell) 46.6 (57.0) 26.3 (9.7)
Reflections total (unique) 85402 (7766) 81955 (17927)

Refinement
Total atoms/Water 1018/101 1048/120
R/Rfree 16.5/22.8 19.0/22.4
rmsd bonds (Å)/angles (°) 0.01/1.41 0.01/1.17
rmsd B (Å2) (main chain: bond/angle/side chain: bond/angle) 0.97/1.61
5.30/4.51
0.67/1.17
1.90/3.00
Ramachandran plot (%) (favored/allowed/generously allowed/disallowed) 97.0/3.0/0/0 94.1/5.0/1.0/0
a

Rsym = Σ|I − <I>|/ΣI, where I is the observed intensity and <I> the average intensity.

b

R based on 95% of the data used in the refinement. Rfree = R based on 5% of the data withheld from the cross-validation test.

Note: The outer shell value (i.e., I/σ) of the native cis-CaaD is unusually high because diffraction data to a higher resolution were not collected on the high quality crystal.

Crystallization and Structure Determination of Inactivated cis-CaaD

cis-CaaD was covalently modified at Pro-1 by incubating the enzyme with a 100-fold excess of (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate (6) and allowing the mixture to sit overnight at room temperature [30]. After removing excess inhibitor by gel filtration chromatography, the inactivated cis-CaaD was concentrated to 15.6 mg/mL in 10 mM Tris-SO4 buffer at pH 8.0. Crystals of inactivated cis-CaaD were obtained from 6-μL hanging drops consisting of equal amount of precipitant solution (0.125 M CaCl2, 0.07 M sodium acetate buffer, 12.5% isopropanol, pH 4.6) and the concentrated protein sample. The cubic-shaped crystals grew within one week to ~0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm in size. A diffraction data set to 1.65Å resolution (82 images at 0.5 degrees each) was collected in-house using a Rigaku RU200H rotating anode X-ray generator (Cu radiation) equipped with a R-AXIS IV++ image plate detector with a crystal-to-detector distance of 100 mm. The data were integrated and scaled using the HKL-2000 program package [22]. The crystals belong to the space group I23 with cell constants a = 96.78 Å. The asymmetric unit contains one monomer of 149 residues, with a calculated Matthews’ coefficient of 2.31 A3/Da corresponding to a solvent content of 47% [23]. Residues 119-149 were not resolved in the electron density map.

Molecular replacement solutions were obtained as described above for the native structure. The molecular replacement yielded the position and orientation of one monomer in the asymmetric unit. Refinement of the solutions by AMORE gave a correlation coefficient of 0.52 and an R-factor of 0.43 [26]. After an automatic refinement with CNS a new set of coordinates with an R-test of 0.437 and an R-work of 0.348 were generated. After several refinement rounds with CNS and REFMAC5, manual model building with the program O [2729], and the addition of water molecules, a final structural model was obtained. A summary of the refinement statistics and geometric quality of the model is given in Table 1.

Construction of the R117A-cis-CaaD Mutant

The R117A mutant of cis-CaaD was generated using the coding sequence for cis-CaaD in plasmid pET(cis-CaaD) as the template. The mutant was constructed using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit and the indicated set of primers (vide infra) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The forward primer was 5′-GGTGGAGTACGGCGCGTTCCTGCCCCAGCCC-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-GCTTCTCTGTACGCCCCGAAGCAATCGTTGCTTGGACCC-3′. In each set of primers, the mutation is underlined and the remaining bases correspond to the coding sequence (forward primer) or the complementary sequence (reverse primer). DNA sequencing verified that only the intended mutation had been introduced into the mutant genes.

Production and Purification of the R117A-cis-CaaD Mutant

The mutant was expressed and purified using a protocol adapted from the one described for the wild-type enzyme [10]. In order to eliminate the possibility of contaminating proteins, the enzyme was purified using disposable hand-packed columns [17]. Typically, in this protocol, cells from 1 L of culture were suspended in ~8 mL of 10 mM Na2HPO4 buffer, pH 8.0, (Buffer A), sonicated, and centrifuged. Subsequently, the supernatant was loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose column (10 × 1.0 cm filled with 8 mL of resin) that had been previously equilibrated with Buffer A. The column was first washed with Buffer A (25 mL) and then the protein was eluted by gravity using a linear Na2SO4 gradient (0–0.5 M Na2SO4 in Buffer A, 100 mL). The flow rate was estimated to be ~1 mL/min. Fractions (~1.5 mL) were collected and the R117A-mutant of cis-CaaD was identified by SDS-PAGE. The mutant eluted 4.5–7.5 min after being loaded onto the column. The appropriate fractions were pooled and made 1 M in (NH4)2SO4 by the slow addition of an aliquot of 10 mM Na2HPO4 buffer, pH 8.0, containing 2 M (NH4)2SO4. After stirring for 1 h, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation (15 min at 20,000 × g), and the supernatant was filtered and loaded onto a Phenyl-Sepharose column (10 × 1.0 cm filled with 8 mL of resin) that had been previously equilibrated with Buffer A containing 1 M (NH4)2SO4. The column was first washed with the loading buffer (25 mL) and then the protein was eluted by gravity using a decreasing linear (NH4)2SO4 gradient [1.6-0 M (NH4)2SO4 in Buffer A, 100 mL]. The flow rate was estimated to be ~1 mL/min. Fractions (~1.5 mL) were collected and analyzed as described above. The R117A mutant of cis-CaaD eluted 31.5–54 min after being loaded onto the column. The purified protein was concentrated to ~5 mg/mL, filtered through a 0.2 μm-pore diameter filter, and stored at 4 °C. A typical yield is ~100 mg of protein purified to homogeneity per liter of culture.

Kinetic Assays

The kinetic assays were performed at 22 °C by following the decrease in absorbance at 224 nm, which corresponds to the hydration of cis-3-chloroacrylic acid (2, ε = 2900 M−1 cm−1) [10]. An aliquot of the R117A-mutant was diluted into 20 mM Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 9.0), yielding a final enzyme concentration of 1.24 μM, and incubated for 60 min at 22 °C. Subsequently, a 1-mL portion was transferred to a cuvette and the enzyme activity was assayed by the addition of a small quantity of substrate from a 5 mM or 50 mM stock solution. The 50 mM stock solution was made up in 100 mM Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 9.0). The addition of cis-3-chloroacrylic acid (as the free acid) to this buffer adjusted the pH of the stock solution to ~7. The 5 mM stock solution was made up by dilution of an aliquot of the 50 mM stock solution into 20 mM NaH2PO4 buffer, pH 7.3. The concentrations of substrate used in the assay ranged from 10 to 50 μM.

Examination of (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate (6) as an Irreversible Inhibitor of the R117A-mutant of cis-CaaD

The R117A mutant (~1 mg/mL, 20 μM in monomer concentration) was incubated separately with (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate (0.775 mM) in 10 mM NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 8.0) [30]. The mixture (total volume of 1 mL) was incubated for 4 h at 4 °C. An aliquot (10 μL) of the mixture was then withdrawn, diluted into 1 mL of 20 mM Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 9.0), and assayed for residual activity as described above (following the decrease in absorbance at 224 nm). The activity assay was initiated by the addition of a small quantity of the substrate to give a final concentration of 200 μM. The R117A mutant is saturated under these conditions. Stock solutions (50 mM) of cis-3-chloroacrylic acid was made up in 100 mM Na2HPO4 buffer, and the pH was adjusted to 7.3. Stock solutions (10 mM) of the inhibitor were made up in 10 mM NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 8.0).

Mass Spectral Analysis of the (R)-oxirane-2-carboxylate-treated R117A-mutant of cis-CaaD

The incubation mixture from the previous experiment was loaded onto a PD-10 Sephadex G-25 gel filtration column, which had previously been equilibrated with 100 mM NH4HCO3 buffer (pH 8.0) [10,30]. The protein was eluted by gravity flow using the same buffer. Fractions (0.5 mL) were analyzed for the presence of protein by UV absorbance at 215 nm. The appropriate fraction containing the purified protein was analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). In a separate control experiment, the same quantity of the R117A-mutant of cis-CaaD was incubated without inhibitor under otherwise identical conditions and analyzed by ESI-MS.

3. Results

Structure of Native cis-CaaD

The native cis-CaaD crystal structure was solved to 2.01-Å resolution by molecular replacement methods and refined to R and Rfree values of 16.2% and 22.8%, respectively. The asymmetric unit contains one monomer composed of two repeats of the β–α–β structural motif, which is the characteristic tautomerase superfamily fold [1214]. In the cis-CaaD monomer, Pro-1 to Gln-9 make up a β-strand (β-1), Asp-10 to Thr-13 is in a loop that connects β-1 to the first α-helix (α-1, Pro-14 to Arg-29), and Gly-30 to Ala-39 comprise a loop that connects α-1 to the parallel β-strand (β-2, Gln-40 to Gln-46). The sequence Pro-47 to Thr-62 is in a loop that connects β-2 to the third β-strand (β-3, Ile-63 to Glu-71), which is anti-parallel to β-2, Gly-72 to Ser-74 comprise a loop that connects β-3 to the second α-helix (α-2, Ala-75 to Ala-93), Glu-94 to Lys-98 is in a loop that connects α-2 to the fourth β-strand (β-4, His-99 to Met-107), which is parallel to β-3. Finally, Pro-108 to Arg-117 is in a loop, but the electron densities for the amino acid residues after Arg-117 are not well-defined.

The disordered C-terminus (residues 118-149) is one notable difference between this structure and that reported by de Jong et al [16]. The de Jong structure was crystallized at low pH (i.e., pH 4.2) whereas this structure was crystallized at higher pH (i.e., pH 9.0). The higher pH likely altered the hydrogen bond and/or electrostatic interactions so that the C-terminus is unstructured and not observed. It should be noted that the inactivated cis-CaaD structure reported by de Jong et al was obtained at pH 7.5 and also shows a disordered C-terminus (residues 117-149) [16].

The structure shows several clusters of polar residues at the monomer-monomer interfaces that help stabilize the trimer (Figure 1). This includes the pseudo 2-fold related clusters of (Lys-17, Glu-45, Asn-50′) and (Lys-78′, Glu-106′, Gln-111) at each end of the interface, and Tyr-103′ and Glu-114 near the active site proline that interact through a series of hydrogen bonds (Figure 1A)2. For example, the carbonyl group of Asn-50′ forms a hydrogen bond (3.0 Å) with the ε-amino group of Lys-17 and the amide nitrogen forms a hydrogen bond (2.8 Å) with a carboxylate oxygen of Glu-45. Similarly, the carbonyl group of Gln-111 forms a hydrogen bond (2.7 Å) with the ε-amino group of Lys-78′ and the amide nitrogen forms a hydrogen bond (2.9 Å) with a carboxylate oxygen of Glu-106′. The hydroxyl group of Tyr-103′ forms a hydrogen bond (2.7 Å) with a carboxylate oxygen of Glu-114. These interactions play a major role in the stability of the trimer.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A number of hydrogen bonding interactions contribute to trimer stability. A) The interface of two cis-CaaD monomers showing selected residues that form a series of hydrogen bonds. B) The convergence of three monomers showing a well-ordered water network stabilized by amino acid residues near the molecular 3-fold axis. C) Hydrogen bonds between the C-terminal loop of one monomer with residues from the β-sheet of an adjacent monomer. This Figure and subsequent figures were prepared using PyMol [31].

Near the crystallographic and inherently inner molecular 3-fold there are well ordered water molecules that appear to play roles in stabilizing the trimer through a hydrogen bonding interaction network (Figure 1B). These water molecules are coordinated by the side chains of Tyr-6, His-66, Glu-71, and Glu-106. The same residue is contributed by each monomer (i.e., Tyr-6, Tyr-6′, and Tyr-6″).

Finally, hydrogen bonds between the C-terminal loop of one monomer and the βsheet of an adjacent subunit also contribute to the stability of the trimer (Figure 1C). For example, there are hydrogen bonds between the oxygen atom of the backbone carbonyl group of Gln-111 and the amide proton of the backbone of Phe-104′, the oxygen atom of the backbone carbonyl group of Val-113 and the amide proton of the backbone of Val-102′, and the amide proton of the backbone of Gly-116 and the oxygen of the backbone carbonyl group of Ile-100′. There are also interactions between Phe-43 and Asn-50′, Val-41 and Phe-52′, and Ala-39 and Gly-54′.

The Active Site of Native cis-CaaD

A visual inspection of the active site shows that it is mostly hydrophilic with several charged residues (both positively and negatively charged) and an extensive water molecule network (Figure 2). A calculation of the electrostatic surface potential map of the active site illustrates this observation and is consistent with the function of cis-CaaD (i.e., hydrolytic dehalogenation) and the assumed pKa of 9.2 for Pro-1 in cis-CaaD [10,30].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A close-up view of an active site of native cis-CaaD. The key catalytic residues are shown along with Thr-34, Trp-101′, and Arg-1172.

cis-CaaD is a trimer with three active sites where an N-terminal proline is centered in each active site [16]. A sulfate or phosphate ion (from the crystallization buffer) is bound in the active site (Figure 2). de Jong et al made the same observation [16]. The sulfate ion interacts with the side chains of Thr-34 and Arg-73 and the backbone amide nitrogen of Arg-70. The prolyl nitrogen interacts with the oxygen atom of one of the active site water molecules, which also interacts with the sulfate ion (Figure 2). Additionally, the carboxylate oxygen of Glu-114 forms a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group of Tyr-103′, which is from a second subunit of the cis-CaaD trimer. His-28, Arg-70, Trp-101′ and Arg-117, the last residue of the polypeptide chain with defined electron density, are also located in the active site.

The different position of the sulfate ion and crystallization pH value can account for the subtle differences in active site configurations [16]. The de Jong structure was crystallized at low pH, potentially making the side chain of Glu-114 predominately protonated and uncharged [16]. In both structures, one side chain oxygen interacts with the hydroxyl group of Tyr-103′. In the de Jong structure, the side chain carboxylic moiety shifts, placing an oxygen within hydrogen bonding distance of the backbone carbonyl group of Leu-38, reflecting its presumed protonation. In the de Jong structure, the side chains of Arg-70 and Arg-73 also show slightly altered conformations (Figure 3) [16]. Different rotamers are also observed for the side chains of His-36, Gln-35, and Arg-29, but the backbone elements superimpose.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Superposition of the active site of native cis-CaaD reported here (gray) and that reported by de Jong (white) [16].

The loop, which connects the α-1 helix to the parallel β-strand (β-2), is comprised of residues 32-38 (Thr-Gly-Thr-Gln-His-Phe-Leu), adopts the same position in both native structures (designated the open state). With the exception of the different rotamers observed for the side chains of Gln-35 and His-36, both the backbone and side chains of the loop residues superimpose. As explained below, the position of this loop may have implications for the catalytic mechanism (vide infra).

Structure of cis-CaaD Inactivated by (R)-6

The inactivated complex crystal structure of cis-CaaD was solved to 1.65 Å resolution by molecular replacement methods and refined to R and Rfree values of 19.0% and 22.3%, respectively. The asymmetric unit contains one monomer. The active site shows the proline covalently attached to the expected 2-hydroxypropanoate adduct, generated by the attack of the prolyl nitrogen at C-3 of (R)-6 (Figure 4 and Scheme 3) [16]. The adduct is in a distinctly different conformation from that previously reported (Figure 5) [16]. Moreover, its presence disrupts the hydrogen bond network seen in the native cis-CaaD and results in a different hydrogen bond network. The C-2 hydroxyl group of the adduct forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of the Leu-38 in the 7-membered loop (Thr-32 to Leu-38). One carboxylate oxygen of the adduct forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone amide nitrogens of Phe-37 and Leu-38. The other carboxylate oxygen forms a hydrogen bond with a water molecule that is held in place by the side chains of His-28 and His-36. The interactions between the loop residues and the adduct reposition the loop such that some residues point inward (i.e., the backbone of Phe-37 and Leu-38 and the side chain of His-36) and others point up and away from Pro-1 (i.e., the backbone of Thr-34 and Gln-35) or above Pro-1 (i.e., the side chain of Gln-35 moves towards Arg-70). This conformation is designated the closed state and contrasts with the loop’s position in both native structures and the inactivated structure reported by de Jong et al (Figure 5) [16].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A close-up view of an active site of inactivated cis-CaaD where the Pro-1 is covalently bonded to 2-hydroxypropanoate via the prolyl nitrogen (as shown in Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Superposition of the active sites of inactivated cis-CaaD reported here (color) and that reported by de Jong (white) [16]. Note the striking differences in the orientations of the 2-hydroxypropanoate adduct.

The residues that interact with the adduct in the inactivated structures reported here and by de Jong et al. make different contacts. Accordingly, one carboxylate oxygen of the Glu-114 forms a hydrogen bond with the phenolic hydroxyl group of Tyr-103′ from a second monomer and the other carboxylate oxygen forms a hydrogen bond with a nearby water molecule and the ηN atom of Arg-117. Arg-70 and Arg-73 form hydrogen bonds with several water molecules. One such water molecule is within hydrogen bond distance with a second water molecule, that is, in turn, near the water molecule positioned by His-28, His-36, and the covalent adduct. All six water molecules together with the adduct and amino acid residues in the active site form a more complex hydrogen bond network than the one in the native structure of cis-CaaD.

Kinetic Characterization of the R117A Mutant of cis-CaaD

The kinetic parameters for the R117A mutant of cis-CaaD were determined using cis-3-chloroacrylic acid (2) and compared to those measured for the wild type. For the wild type enzyme, the Km is 34 ± 8 μM, the kcat is 1.8 ± 0.2 s−1, and the kcat/Km is 5.3 × 104 M−1s−1 [10,17]. For the R117A mutant, the Km is 15 ± 3 μM (down 2.3-fold), the kcat is 0.4 ± 0.1 s−1 (down 4.5-fold), and the kcat/Km is 2.6 × 104 M−1s−1 (down 2-fold). Although the mutation of Arg-117 has some effect on the kinetic parameters, it is not a major one (such as that observed for the Pro-1, His-28, Arg-70, Arg-73, Tyr-103, or Glu-114).

ESI-MS Analysis of the R117A Mutant of cis-CaaD Treated with (R)-6

In order to determine whether Arg-117 plays a role in the alkylation reaction, the R117A mutant of cis-CaaD was treated with (R)-6 for 24 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, the (R)-6-treated protein sample was purified by gel filtration chromatography and analyzed by ESI-MS. An untreated sample of the R117A mutant showed a signal corresponding to a molecular mass of 16536 ± 2 Da. Mass spectral analysis of the (R)-6-treated sample of the R117A mutant indicated that it consists of one major component with an observed molecular mass of 16624 ± 2 Da (data not shown), which corresponds to the expected molecular mass of the R117A mutant covalently modified by 6 (i.e., a mass increases of 88 Da). Previous work has shown that Pro-1, Arg-70, and Arg-73 are important for the inactivation reaction but Glu-114 is not [30]. Hence, like Glu-114, Arg-117 is not important for the alkylation reaction.

4. Discussion

Sequence analysis, mutagenesis experiments, inhibition studies, and previous crystallographic structures were instrumental in formulating working hypotheses for the catalytic mechanism of cis-CaaD as well as its inactivation by the epoxide, (R)-6 [9,10,16,30]. The de Jong crystal structure of cis-CaaD inactivated by (R)-6 established that C-3 is the site of attack by the prolyl nitrogen of Pro-1 (Scheme 3) [16]. Furthermore, the alignment of the 2-hydroxyl group and the carboxylate oxygens of the ring-opened 2-hydroxypropanoate adduct with Arg-70, Arg-73, and His-28, respectively, implicated these residues as critical ones in the inactivation mechanism [16]. Based on the observed interactions, it was proposed that Arg-73 and His-28 are primarily involved in binding the carboxylate group of (R)-6 at the active site whereas Arg-70 facilitates ring opening by directly interacting with the epoxide oxygen or by placing a water molecule in position to interact with the oxygen (Scheme 3) [16]. The observations were supported by experiments showing that Pro-1, Arg-70, and Arg-73 are required for the inactivation process, but not Glu-114 [30].

The structure of cis-CaaD inactivated by (R)-6 reported here is seemingly at odds with the proposed inactivation mechanism because the ring-opened adduct does not show any of the same interactions except for the covalent bond between C-3 and the prolyl nitrogen of Pro-1. Instead, the adduct interacts with a 7-member loop consisting of residues 32-38 (Thr-Gly-Thr-Gln-His-Phe-Leu) where the 2-hydroxyl group forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Leu-38 and one C-1 carboxylate oxygen interacts with the backbone amide nitrogens of Phe-37 and Leu-38 (through hydrogen bonding). (The other C-1 carboxylate oxygen interacts with a water bound to His-28 and His-36.) Two observations suggest that this structure does not accurately reflect the inactivation mechanism: it is unlikely that the carbonyl group of Leu-38 assists in ring opening of the epoxide and this crystal structure was obtained at pH 4.6 in the presence of 12.5% isopropanol. Hence, the actual interactions made during the inactivation process might have been distorted by the low pH and isopropanol, and the de Jong structure (obtained at pH 7.5) likely presents a more accurate portrayal of the residues involved in the inactivation process [16].

Nonetheless, the position of the loop in our inactivated structure (compared to its position in the three other known structures) suggests that the loop region is floppy and raises an interesting possibility: the loop may play a role in the catalytic cycle. There are two lines of indirect evidence supporting this possibility. First, a pre-steady state analysis of the cis-CaaD reaction shows a change in fluorescence, immediately upon substrate binding. The two fluorescent states might correspond to different states of the active sites, which are designated the open and closed states. Movement of the loop (upon substrate binding) could put the enzyme in the closed state so that catalysis can occur. The second piece of evidence comes from studies of a cis-CaaD homologue (designated Cg10062) from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Cg10062 has ~53% sequence similarity with cis-CaaD and conserves the six active site residues implicated as critical ones in the cis-CaaD mechanism and the other residues that define the active site region. However, Cg10062 is not an efficient or highly specific cis-CaaD. It has very poor cis-CaaD activity (as assessed by kcat/Km value) and processes both the cis- and trans-isomers. Interestingly, the 7-member loop in Cg10062 consists of very different residues (Ala-32, His-33, Ala-34, Pro-35, Lys-36, Tyr-37, and Leu-38). It may be that the bulky charged group (His-33), the absent Thr-34 (which may form part of a binding pocket for the chloro group), and the rigid Pro-35 alter the loop properties such that it can no longer adopt the closed conformation. The inability to do this could account for the poor cis-CaaD activity of Cg10062.

The position of Arg-117 in the crystal structures reported here and elsewhere suggested that it might also contribute to the mechanism of inactivation and/or catalysis. Notably, in the inactivated structure, the ηN atom of Arg-117 interacts with a water molecule that forms a hydrogen bond with Arg-70, Arg-73, and a carboxylate oxygen of Glu-114. For these reasons, it was changed to an alanine and the properties of the resulting R117A mutant were characterized. Changing Arg-117 to an alanine has little effect on the steady state kinetic parameters and no effect on the alkylation of Pro-1 when incubated with (R)-6. The combined findings suggest that Arg-117 is not a key residue in either process.

The crystallographic observations reported here add the 7-residue loop as a potential element in the proposed mechanisms for cis-CaaD catalysis and its inactivation by (R)-6 (Figure 6). In catalysis, the loop is initially in the open state (Figure 6A). Substrate binding may trigger movement of the loop such that it adopts the closed conformation (Figure 6B). In this closed position, the loop may also complete the active site and put determinants of specificity in place. Once catalysis is complete, the loop may adopt the open conformation and products can dissociate (Figure 6A). The loop residues are not highly conserved between cis-CaaD and CaaD (Thr-32, Gly-33, Thr-34, Gln-35, His-36, Phe-37, and Leu-38 for cis-CaaD and Ile-32, Gly-33, Ser-34, Asp-35, Pro-36, Lys-37, and Ile-38 for the β-subunit of CaaD) so that a similar structural element is not part of the CaaD catalytic mechanism. Evidently, epoxide binding also triggers loop movement, but the resulting covalent modification of Pro-1 freezes the enzyme in the closed conformation. A mutagenesis study of the loop residues is underway to determine if the crystallographic observations are representative of catalytic events or if they are artifacts.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Substrate/inhibitor binding may trigger a significant conformational change of loop residues 32-38 in cis-CaaD from (A) an open state (native cis-CaaD) to (B) a closed state (inactivated cis-CaaD). Only His-36, Phe-37, and Leu-38 are shown for illustrative purposes.

Research Highlights.

Because I am one of the authors, the manuscript should be handled by Dr. Ben Liu (h.w.liu@mail.utexas.edu). Possible reviewers include Shelley Copley (shelley.copley@colorado.edu), Karen Allen (drkallen@bu.edu), and William Monfort (montfort@email.arizona.edu).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Gottfried K. Schroeder (The University of Texas at Austin) for helpful comments and discussions.

Footnotes

1

Abbreviations used: Ap, ampicillin; BICINE, N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)glycine; CaaD, trans-3-chloroacrylic acid dehalogenase; cis-CaaD, cis-3-chloroacrylic acid dehalogenase; ESI-MS, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; LB, Luria-Bertani; 4-OT, 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PDB, Protein Data Bank; rmsd, root-mean-square deviation; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

2

The primed residues refer to different subunits within the cis-CaaD trimer.

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant GM-65324 and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-1334 to CPW and F-1219 to MLH).

The atomic coordinates and structure factors of the native and inactivated cis-CaaD have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank as entries 3MF8 and 3MF7, respectively.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Hileman B. Chem Eng News. 1993;71:11–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hooper SW, Pettigrew CA, Sayler GS. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1990;9:655–667. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shapiro JA. Gene. 2005;345:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benning MM, Taylor KL, Liu RQ, Yang G, Xiang H, Wesenberg G, Dunaway-Mariano D, Holden HM. Biochemistry. 1996;35:8103–8109. doi: 10.1021/bi960768p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Copley SD. In: Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry. Barton D, Nakanishi K, editors. Vol. 5. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1999. pp. 401–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abramowicz DA. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1990;10:241–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van Hylckama Vlieg JET, Janssen DB. Biodegradation. 1992;2:139–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00124488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Poelarends GJ, Wilkens M, Larkin MJ, van Elsas JD, Janssen DB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2931–2936. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.8.2931-2936.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang SC, Person MD, Johnson WH, Jr, Whitman CP. Biochemistry. 2003;42:8762–8773. doi: 10.1021/bi034598+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Poelarends GJ, Serrano H, Person MD, Johnson WH, Jr, Murzin AG, Whitman CP. Biochemistry. 2004;43:759–772. doi: 10.1021/bi0355948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murzin AG. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:386–394. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Whitman CP. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;402:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00052-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poelarends GJ, Whitman CP. Bioorg Chem. 2004;32:376–392. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2004.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poelarends GJ, Whitman CP. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:3606–3618. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8285-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Jong RM, Brugman W, Poelarends GJ, Whitman CP, Dijkstra BW. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:11546–11552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311966200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de Jong RM, Bazzacco P, Poelarends GJ, Johnson WH, Jr, Kim YJ, Burks EA, Serrano H, Thunnissen AM, Whitman CP, Dijkstra BW. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:2440–2449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608134200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Poelarends GJ, Serrano H, Person MD, Johnson WJ, Jr, Whitman CP. Biochemistry. 2008;47:8139–8147. doi: 10.1021/bi8007388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petit Y, Larcheveque M. Organic Syntheses. 1998;75:37–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Cold Spring Harbor, New York: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laemmli UK. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Waddell WJ. J Lab Clin Med. 1956;48:311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. In: Methods in Enzymology. Carter CW Jr, Sweet RM, editors. Vol. 276. Academic Press; New York: 1997. pp. 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matthews BW. J Mol Biol. 1968;33:491–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Claude J-B, Suhre K, Notredame C, Claverie J-M, Abergel C. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W606–W609. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh400. ( http://www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr/Caspr2/index.cgi) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. Acta Crystallogr D. 1994;50:760–763. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Navaza J. Acta Crystallogr A. 1994;50:157–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brünger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T, Warren GL. Acta Crystallogr D. 1998;54:905–921. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Acta Crystallogr D. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jones TA, Zou JY, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Acta Crystallogr A. 1991;47:110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Poelarends GJ, Serrano H, Johnson WJ, Jr, Whitman CP. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7187–7196. doi: 10.1021/bi049823h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific; San Carlos, CA: 2002. ( http://www.pymol.org) [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES