Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2010 Apr 9;92(4):335–337. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12628812459733

Is peri-articular multimodal drug infiltration in knee arthroplasty safe when used in conjunction with autologous retransfusion drains?

I Gill 1, K Gallagher 1, CA Busch 1
PMCID: PMC3025216  PMID: 20501020

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adequate peri-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) promotes earlier rehabilitation but remains problematic because of the drug side-effects. Peri-articular multimodal drug infiltration (PMDI) has been developed as an alternative strategy to avoid such complications. Autologous retransfusion drains reduce the need for peri-operative allogenic blood transfusions and the consequent risk. There is a theoretical risk of local anaesthesia toxicity when these systems are used concurrently. We performed a review of current practice to quantify this risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 10 patients undergoing TKA by the senior author (CAB) had drain fluid analysed for the concentration of ropivacaine. At the same time, the patients completed a questionnaire to establish the presence of ropiva-caine-induced side-effects.

RESULTS

The ropivacaine level in the retransfusion blood was less than 10 mg in all patients. This concentration was a factor of 6 below the published safe level. Three patients had minor neurological disturbances which recovered spontaneously and quickly. There were no cases of significant cardiovascular compromise.

CONCLUSIONS

The theoretical risk of local anaesthesia toxicity when these systems are used together is negligible and we conclude that peri-articular multimodal drug infiltration is safe in conjunction with the use of autotransfusion drains.

Keywords: Arthroplasty, Knee, Analgesia, Drain


Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common elective orthopaedic operations performed in the UK with over 70,000 procedures performed in 2007–20088.1 The surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain. Adequate analgesia is essential for optimising rehabilitation.2,3 Multiple modes of analgesia have been used, such as epidurals, patient-controlled analgesia and continuous intra-articular infusions. However, side effects remain common and often problematic.4,5 This has led to the development of multimodal peri-articular infiltration, consisting of a local anaesthetic, morphine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and epinephrine. This technique has proven to reduce peri-operative pain over other methods allowing good pain relief, reduced hospital stay and improved patient satisfaction.6 The technique involves injecting some of the mixture just prior to implantation of the component, into the posterior aspect of the capsule and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments. Then, injecting into the quadriceps mechanism and the retinacular tissues whilst the cement cured. Finally, the remaining volume is infiltrated into the fat and subcuticular tissues.6

TKA surgery is associated with the need for peri-operative blood transfusion. However, all transfusions have risks of both side effects and the transmission of pathogens. Strategies to reduce transfusion requirements have, therefore, become popular. A technique which has found favour is the use of autologous retransfusion drains.7 This technique allows for collected blood from the joint cavity to be retransfused.

There is a theoretical risk of systemic toxicity due to intravenous administration of some of the components from the multimodal infiltration cocktail accumulated in the blood for retransfusion. The greatest potential for toxicity comes from ropivacaine, which can lead to neurological and cardiovascular symptoms.

We decided to perform a review of our current standard technique to ensure that ropivacaine levels in the retransfused blood were well within safe limits and did not cause significant cardiovascular or neurological side effects.

Patients and Methods

A consecutive series of 10 patients undergoing TKR using peri-articular multimodal analgesics were identified. The PMDI consisted of: 40 ml Naropin (ropivacaine) 10 mg/ml; 1 ml Toradol (ketoralac) 30 mg/ml; 0.6 ml epinephrine 1:1000; 0.5 ml morphine 10 mg/ml; and 50 ml 0.9% normal saline. Autologous retransfusion drains were used. The blood to be retransfused was analysed for ropivacaine levels. A postoperative questionnaire was completed by the patients with help from junior doctors to establish the presence of signs of systemic toxicity over the period of transfusion (Appendix 1).

Results

Ropivacaine levels

The maximum ropivacaine level identified was 9.62 mg/l with a mean value of 6.2 mg/l (range, 1.6–9.6 mg/l). The mean volume transfused was 0.53 l (range 0–1.25 l). The total dose received was less than 6 mg with a theoretical maximum of 12 mg (highest concentration and highest volume). The observed dose of ropivacaine versus reported safe dose is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Total dose and safe dose for ropivacaine.

Questionnaire results

All patients completed the questionnaire and no evidence of cardiovascular compromise in any of the patients retransfused was reported. Neurological symptoms occurred in three patients. One patient reported a transitory metallic taste at the time of the retransfusion, another complained of light-headedness and a further patient of pins and needles, each lasting a few hours.

Discussion

Postoperative pain associated with TKA is described as severe in 60% and moderate in 30% of patients. Inadequate control of peri-operative pain impairs effective rehabilitation.8 The idea of administering pre-emptive pain relief is a logical option as it can prevent central sensitisation and improve postoperative pain.9 PMDI is a safe and effective method of reducing peri-operative pain levels associated with TKA.6

Blood-conserving measures which reduce the need for allogenic peri-operative blood transfusion and its associated risks are important. The use of autologous retransfusion drains has greatly reduced the need for allogenic transfusion in patients undergoing total knee replacement.7

Ropivacaine is a representative of the amino-amide class of local anaesthetics and has been developed to have an improved safety profile over other agents.10 However, adverse effects tend to be either cardiovascular or neurological in nature, although multiple other effects have been reported.11

The safety profile of anaesthetic agents is variable due to multiple factors, including site of use, local vascularity, metabolism, systemic clearance and potency of agent.

A 400-mg dose of ropivacaine used in this study represents a relatively high dose but, due to the site of injection and other agents (epinephrine), blood concentrations are reported to be around 60 mg/l.6 The literature reports mild neurological symptoms with an intravenous bolus of 60 mg and toxic symptoms with a blood concentration of 150 mg/l.12,13

This study demonstrates that the concentration of ropivacaine in retransfused blood is a factor of 6 less than the concentration thought to produce mild neurological symptoms in healthy volunteers and around a 10-fold reduction to cause toxic effects.

Conclusions

The ropivacaine concentration in autologous transfused blood in patients undergoing TKA who have received peri-articular infiltration is negligible. Autologous retransfusion in patients undergoing TKA who have had peri-articular multimodal drug infiltration is safe and without serious side effects.

Appendix 1: Ropivacaine questionnaire

Patient name ………… Hospital number …………DOB…………

Date of surgery …………Procedure …………Side …………

Relevant PMHx …………Patient weight …………kg

Time of surgery …………

Time drain opened …………

Time drain collected for retransfusion …………

Volume retransfused (ml) …………

Time retransfusion over …………

Anaesthesia…………General …………Spinal…………

Antibiotics …………Yes/No …………Teicoplanin & gentamycin

PCA …………Yes/No …………

Volume used …………ml …………Concentration

Opioids prescribed …………Yes/No …………Amount/time given…………

NSAIDs…………Yes/No …………Amount/time given…………

Other relevant medication…………Yes/No …………Amount/time given…………

CNS effects over transfusion period

Tongue numbness    Yes/No    Duration

Metallic taste    Yes/No    Duration

Hearing disturbance    Yes/No    Duration

Lightheaded    Yes/No    Duration

Headache    Yes/No    Duration

Visual disturbances    Yes/No    Duration

Muscle twitching    Yes/No    Duration

Pins/needles    Yes/No    Duration

Coma/convulsions    Yes/No    Duration

Respiratory/CVS depression over transfusion period

Respiratory depression    Yes/No    Duration

Respiratory rate change    Yes/No    Duration

SATS depression    Yes/No    Duration

CVS depression    Yes/No    Duration

Blood pressure depression    Yes/No    Duration

Heart rate change    Yes/No    Duration

Other relevant symptoms or signs …………

Any other information …………

…………

…………

References

  • 1. National Joint Registry, 5th report. < http://www.njrcentre.org.uk>.
  • 2.Klasen JA, Opitz SA, Melzer C, Thiel A, Hempelmann G. Intraarticular, epidural, and intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:1021–6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.431009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D'Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1990;13:643–9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19900601-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mahoney OM, Noble PC, Davidson J, Tullos HS. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on postoperative pain, rehabilitation, and duration of hospitalization in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1990;260:30–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeWeese FT, Akbari Z, Carline E. Pain control after knee arthroplasty: intraarticular versus epidural anesthesia. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:226–31. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Busch C, Shore B, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald S, et al. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:959–63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thomas D, Wareham K, Cohen D, Hutchings H. Autologous blood transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:669–73. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bonica JJ. Postoperative pain. In: Bonica JJ, editor. The Management of Pain. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1990. pp. 461–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heard SO, Edwards WT, Ferrari D, Hanna D, Wong PD, et al. Analgesic effect of intraarticular bupivacaine or morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized, prospective, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:822–6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199206000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. < http://www.bnf.org/bnf/bnf/57/57998.htm>.
  • 11. < http://www.rxlist.com/naropin-drug.htm>.
  • 12.McCartney CJL, Murphy DB, Iagounova A, Chan VWS. Intravenous ropivacaine bolus is a reliable marker of intravascular injection in premedicated healthy volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:795–800. doi: 10.1007/BF03019374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:507–14. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES