Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 24;127(2):e423–e441. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2701

TABLE 1.

Study Characteristics of Pediatric Cohorts in RLCs and DCs

Study Authors (Year) Location N Age, Mean (b) or Median (a) Study Details Follow-up Time, Total (b) or Median (a), mo
RLCs
    Hien et al19 (2009) Burkina Faso 52 6.8 ya IAS abstract 24b
    Fassinou et al20 (2004) Cote d'Ivoire 78 7.2 ya 21% HAART-experienced 21a
    Rouet et al21 (2006) Cote d'Ivoire 78 6.5 ya PI vs NNRTI comparison 36a
    Nyandiko et al22 (2006) Kenya 279 6.0 ya Rural, orphan comparison 34a
    Song et al23 (2007) Kenya 29 8.5 yb Adult comparison 15b
    Van Winghem et al24 (2008) Kenya 648 5.5 ya Adherence: MSF 48b
    Wamalwa et al25 (2007) Kenya 67 4.4 ya Early response 9a
    Reddi et al26 (2007) KwaZulu Natal 151 5.7 ya 16% HAART-experienced 8a
    Leyenaar et al27 (2009) Lesotho 284 2.2 ya BIPAI center of excellence 14b
    Cohen et al28 (2009) Lesotho 283 NR IAS abstract, rural: MSF 24b
    Bong et al29 (2007) Malawi 439 6.0 ya FDC 24b
    —16 (2006) Malawi A: 436 <15 y FDC 6b
B: 233 FDC 12b
    Weigel et al30 (2010) Malawi 497 8.0 ya CROI abstract, growth 24b
    Marazzi et al31 (2006) Mozambique 297 4.4 yb Integrated public health program 9a
    Vaz et al32 (2009) Mozambique 1007 3.0 ya IAS abstract, growth 48b
    van Griensven et al33 (2008) Rwanda 315 7.2 ya Nurse-based care: MSF 45b
    Diack MBaye et al34 (2005) Senegal 98 5.0 ya Non-specific focus 36b
    Barth et al35 (2008) South Africa 66 8 mo to 11 y Rural, ART-naive 12b
    Eley36 (2006) South Africa 409 1.9 ya Severe clinical disease 12b
    Jaspan et al37 (2008) South Africa 391 2.2 ya PI vs NNRTI comparison 48b
    Jooste et al38 (2005) South Africa 100 1–14 y Non-specific focus 6b
    Smit et al39 (2009) South Africa 615 1.8 ya IAS abstract: Cape Town 46b
    Blè et al40 (2007) Tanzania 59 3 mo to 11 y Orphan study 12b
    Kamya et al41 (2007) Uganda 250 9.2 yb Genotypic mutations 14b
    Bolton-Moore et al42 (2007) Zambia 2938 6.8 ya Providers (nonphysicians) 12a
    Gupta et al43 (2009) Zambia 103 8.0 ya IAS: Triomune FDC 36b
    Walker et al44 (2007) Zambia 93 8.8 ya Non-specific focus 24b
    Janssens et al45 (2007) Cambodia 212 6.0 ya Split FDC 36b
    Myung et al13 (2007) Cambodia 117 5.5 ya DOT 26b
    Zhang et al46 (2007) China A: 51 NR HAART-naive 13b
B: 32 NR HAART-experienced 13b
    Rajasekaran et al47 (2009) India 295 7.6 yb Non-specific focus 10a
    Kline et al48 (2007) Romania 414 13.0 yb 82% drug-experienced 51a
    Aurpibul et al49 (2009) Thailand 225 7.4 ya IAS: growth 55b
    Lapphra et al40 (2008) Thailand 139 6.0 ya Siriraj Hospital 36a
    Puthanakit et al51 (2007) Thailand 192 7.6 yb Chiang Mai Hospitals 29a
    Romanelli et al52 (2006) Brazil 43 2.4 yb Dual vs triple antiretroviral therapy 48b
    Martins et al53 (2009) Brazil 196 NR IAS: growth 6b
    Martins et al54 (2009) Brazil 196 NR IAS: immunosuppression 6b
    George et al12 (2007) Haiti 236 6.3 ya Treatment-naive 20a
    Severe et al55 (2005) Haiti 94 <13 y Adult and child study 12b
DCs
    Ghaffari et al56 (2004) US 40 7.1 ya PI: University of Florida, Gainesville 22b
    King et al57 (2005) US 41 6.4 ya PACTG 403, PI nelfinavir 11b
    Krogstad et al58 (1999) US 62 3 mo to 13 y PI nelfinavir, age groups 10a
    Krogstad et al11 (2002) US 192 6.2 ya PACTG 377 11b
    McKinney et al59 (2007) US 37 10.5 ya PACTG 1021 22b
    Melvin et al60 (2002) US 36 6.0 ya 5 patients overlap PACTG 29a
    Patel et al61 (2008) US 1236 NR PACTG 219 10-y follow-up 70a
    Rosenblatt et al62 (2005) US 192 6.2 ya PACTG 377 11b
    Soh et al63 (2003) US 702 6.7 ya PACTG 219 CD4 response 48b
    Spector et al64 (2000) US 57 8.0 ya PACTG 382 11b
    Starr et al65 (1999) US 57 8.0 yb PACTG 382 11b
    Watson et al66 (1999) US 72 NR Adherence and efficacy 9a
    Wiznia et al67 (2000) US 192 6.2 ya PACTG 377 11b
    Yogev et al68 (2002) US 245 7.4 ya PACTG 338 subset 11b
    Bracher et al69 (2007) Denmark 49 6.7 ya Long term follow-up 72b
    Teglas et al70 (2001) France 33 12.5 ya Efavirenz study 9b
    Thuret et al71 (1999) France 22 6.5 ya Non-specific focus 21b
    Wintergerst et al72 (2008) Germany 33 8.2 ya Efavirenz study 50a
    Fraaij et al73 (2005) Netherlands 31 5.1 ya Prospective PI study 48b
    Scherpbier et al74 (2007) Netherlands 36 6.6 ya Efavirenz study 11a
    van Rossum et al75 (2002) Netherlands 32 5.4 ya Non-specific focus 22b
    van Rossum et al76 (2000) Netherlands 28 6.0 ya Non-specific focus 6b
    Verweel et al77 (2002) Netherlands 24 5.2 ya HAART effect on growth 22b
    Nadal et al78 (2000) Switzerland A: 37 6.3 ya Ritonavir 28a
B: 237 7.8 ya Nelfinavir 28a
    Rudin et al79 (2008) Switzerland 133 6.3 ya PI comparison 66b
    Judd et al80 (2007) UK, Ireland 156 NR CHIPS 2003–2006 antiretroviral-naive >9
    Walker et al81 (2004) UK, Ireland 265 4.2 ya CHIPS, antiretroviral-naive 24b
    PENTA82 (2002) 8 countries 103 5.3 ya PENTA 11b

IAS indicates International AIDS Society; PI, protease inhibitor; NNRTI, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; MSF, Medecins Sans Frontiere; BIPAI, Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative; —, No author provided; FDC, fixed-dose combination treatment; CROI, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; DOT, directly observed therapy; NR, not reported; PACTG, Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trial Group; CHIPS, Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study; PENTA, Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS.

a

Mean/total.

b

Median.