Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2009 Nov 18;2009:bcr05.2009.1892. doi: 10.1136/bcr.05.2009.1892

Combined penetrating injury of the perineum and abdominal viscera

Guru P Painuly 1, Dhirendra Singh Negi 2
PMCID: PMC3027570  PMID: 22096464

Abstract

This is a rare presentation. A farmer aged 52 years old was brought to the emergency service of Government District (Doon) Hospital in the late evening having significant bleeding per rectum. He had injured his perineum on a sharp wooden stick during a fall near a tube well. The wooden stick had been extracted by his relatives, which had resulted in profuse bleeding. The patient was managed with intravenous crystalloids and rushed to the operating theatre for examination under analgesia. Blood transfusion was arranged and the wound explored under general anaesthesia. The patient had unusual associated visceral injuries as well as sphincter, rectum, urinary bladder, ileal loop and mesentery injuries. The injured bowel, mesentery, urinary bladder and rectum were repaired with diversion of the upper pelvic colon. In addition, debridement of the perineal wound with rectal sphincter repair was performed and the presacral space drained. The colostomy was closed after 3 months, and the patient survived and is continent.

Background

Combined penetrating rectal and visceral injuries preset a challenge to the surgeon. Most of the injuries are sustained in accidents. The mortality in such cases is due to exsanguinations from pelvic or visceral injuries. Whereas the standard treatment for penetrating rectal trauma (intraperitoneal) consists of perioperative antibiotics, a diverting colostomy and presacral drainage, in addition distal rectal washouts have been advocated for extraperitoneal rectal injury. This management scheme is inadequate for penetrating rectal trauma combined with urinary tract and other visceral injury. It is suggested that in every case of penetrating perineal injury, a combined rectal and urinary tract injury should be ruled out accordingly to avoid any mortality.

Case presentation

A stout 52-year-old local man, a farmer, was brought in to the emergency service of the district hospital as a case of traumatic perineal injury. The patient had experienced a fall from some height near a tube well in the fields that had resulted in a sharp wooden stick getting driven through his perineum. The wooden stick was extracted by some locals using moderate force. The patient bled profusely and was brought to the hospital. On examination he was found to be in a state of shock. He was bleeding from the rectum and perirectal area. He reported severe hypogastric pain, in addition rigidity was present in the lower abdomen. Shock was managed with rapid blood transfusions and intravenous fluids and the patient was moved to the operating theatre.

The patient was examined under general anaesthesia. He had a perineal wound in the post anal area near the midline with the rectum; the direction of injury tract was anterior–superior as well as cranial (fig 1). Laparotomy through a long incision revealed laceration in the anterior rectal wall, base and superior surface of the urinary bladder in addition to lacerations of ileal loops and mesentery.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Direction of sharp object.

Outcome and follow-up

There were no significant postoperative complications and the patient fared well (table 1).

Table 1.

Treatments performed

Injured structure Operative procedure
Ileal loops, mesentery Repair of ileal lacerations, excision of ragged tissue and closure of mesenteric rents
Urinary bladder Tear was extended to fundal area to repair posterior bladder wall from inside followed by fundal repair and indwelling malecot catheter left in bladder
Rectum Rectosigmoid mobilised, peritoneum reflected and rectum pulled up to repair anterior wall and omental patch interposed between repaired bladder wall and rectum. Pelvic colostomy (proximal to repair) followed by peritoneal lavage and laparotomy closure with pelvic drain.
Perineal wound Limited debridement, sphincter repair and presacral drain inserted; posterior rectal wall repaired through anus
Supportive treatment Heavy antibiotics plus blood transfusion and intravenous supplementation
Late management Malecot removal after 2 weeks, colostomy closure after 3 months

There has been no evidence of rectal stricture to date.

Discussion

Rectal or visceral injuries may be sustained due to falls onto blunt edges or spiked objects. In addition, multiple visceral injuries can occur that sometimes present as acute abdominal issues with or without shock; some cases can present only with rectal bleeding. There have been case reports/series/meta analysis published on rectal trauma.114 However, there have been limited case reports on combined urinary and rectal trauma. Franko et al15, in a review of 200 cases of penetrating rectal trauma (17 cases had in addition genitourinary injuries), concluded that the standard treatment of penetrating rectal trauma consists of perioperative antibiotics, a diverting colostomy and presacral drainage. They have added that this management scheme is inadequate in combined penetrating rectal and genitourinary tract injuries. They have advised careful debridement of all necrotic tissue, urinary and faecal diversion, tension free wound closure with well vascularised tissue and adequate drainage, in addition they advise separation of injured sites with omentum to reduce high incidence of rectourethral and rectovesical fistula in cases of combined rectal and genitourinary tract trauma. David et al16 have also reported perineal injuries in complicated pelvic trauma. The management of complex perineal injuries has been discussed by Kudsk et al.17 They have recommended debridement, faecal diversion and rectal washouts as the primary therapy for the complex perineal lacerations. Biriukov et al18 presented results of treatment of extraperitoneal rectal and perineal injuries for 153 patients. Wide opening and drainage of the wound was carried out in all cases. They have advocated this method for extraperitoneal, rectal and perineal injuries; the method also allows colostomy. Ganzalez et al19, in a review, concluded that non-destructive rectal injuries can be successfully managed by faecal diversion. Crispen et al20 suggested omental flap interposition between the rectum and bladder to decrease incidence of fistula and urinoma formation. Rectal impalement associated with intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal bladder rupture was reported in a 9-year-old boy by Kim et al.21 The high mortality in combined penetrating trauma to rectum and urinary system has been highlighted by Steiner et al.22 After a retrospective analysis of similar cases, Liu et al23 have concluded that in penetrating anorectal wounds, early recognition of concomitant injuries, selection of appropriate surgical interventions and strengthening of perioperative care are the key to improve the curative effects.

Learning points

  • In all cases of perineal injury due to sharp objects that involve the rectum and urinary tract, visceral injury should be suspected and treated.

  • Exploratory laparotomy to control the visceral damage coupled with diversion of pelvic colon should be performed. In addition, debridement of the perineal wound and presacral drainage are to be instituted.

  • If such a protocol is followed then the high mortality in cases of pelvic injuries may be reduced significantly.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Patient/guardian consent was obtained for publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lippert H, Falkenberg B. Strategy and technique in perineal impalement injuries. Chirurg 2001; 72: 1402–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ivatury RR, Licata J, Gunduz Y, et al. Management options in penetrating rectal injuries. Am Surg 1991; 57: 50–5 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Steinman E, Cunha JC, Branco PD, et al. Traumatic rectal injuries. Arq Gastroenterol 1990; 27: 120–5 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brunner RG, Shatney CH. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of rectal trauma. Blunt versus penetrating. Am Surg 1987; 53: 215–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stelzner F. Complex trauma of the perineum, especially the anorectal continence organ. Experiences and results in 27 patients 1956–1988. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1990; 375: 55–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas DD, Levison MA, Dykstra BJ, et al. Management of rectal injuries. Dogma versus practice. Am Surg 1990; 56: 507–10 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR. The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries. J Trauma 1998; 45: 656–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Steining JP, Boyd CR. Presacral drainage in penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: is it necessary? Am Surg 1996; 62: 765–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL. Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all? Ann Surg 1989; 209: 600–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McGrath V, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Rectal trauma: management based on anatomic distinctions. Am Surg 1998; 64: 1136–41 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bostick PJ, Johnson DA, Heard JF, et al. Management of extraperitoneal rectal injuries. J Natl Mes Assoc 1993; 85: 460–3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tuggle D, Huber PJ., Jr Management of rectal trauma. Am J Surg 1984; 148: 806–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chareonkwan P. Rectal injuries. J Med Assoc Thai 1993; 76: 576–80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Falabella A, et al. Operative management of civilian rectal gunshot wounds: simple is better. World J Surg 2000; 24: 114–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Franko ER, Evatury RR, Schwalb DM. Combined penetrating rectal and genitourinary injuries: a challenge in management. J Trauma 1993; 34: 347–53 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.David A, Mollenhoff G, Josten C, et al. Perineal injuries in complicated pelvic trauma. Swiss Surg 1996; 1: 4–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kudsk KA, Mc Queen MA, Voeller GR, et al. Management of complex perineal soft tissue injuries. J Trauma 1990; 30: 1155–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Biriukov IV, Volkov OV, Radzhabov AS, et al. Surgical treatment of extraperitoneal rectal and perineal injuries. Khirurgia (Mosk) 2000; 6: 37–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gonzalez RP, Phelan H, 3rd, Hassan M, et al. Is faecal diversion necessary for non destructive penetrating extra peritoneal rectal injuries? J Trauma 2006; 61: 815–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crispen PL, Kansas BT, Pieri PG, et al. Immediate post operative complications of combined penetrating rectal and bladder injuries. J Trauma 2007; 62: 325–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim S, Linden B, Cendron M, et al. Pediatric anorectal empalement with bladder rupture: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: E1–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steiner Z, Mogilner G, Eldar S. Combined penetrating trauma of the rectum and urinary bladder. Harefuah 1995; 128: 276–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lix XS, Hui XZ, Zhang YD, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of penetrating anorectal wounds. Chin J Traumatol 2006; 9: 56–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES