Abstract
Voriconazole concentrations were determined in autopsy samples of eight patients who had been treated for a median of 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 5 days). Voriconazole penetrates well into various tissues, with median levels of 6.26 μg/g ((interquartile range [IQR], 7.87 μg/g) in the lung, 3.41 μg/g (IQR, 16.72 μg/g) in the brain, 6.89 μg/g (IQR, 24.16 μg/g) in the liver, 6.47 μg/g (IQR, 6.19 μg/g) in the kidneys, 5.60 μg/g (IQR, 11.49 μg/g) in the spleen, and 7.55 μg/g (IQR, 16.91 μg/g) in the myocardium.
Voriconazole (VRC) is an expanded-spectrum triazole with a broad antimycotic spectrum, including Aspergillus and non-albicans Candida species. It is the drug of choice for treatment of invasive aspergillosis (12, 27). The bioavailability after oral intake of VRC is reported to be almost complete (96%) in healthy volunteers, but lower and variable in patients (23.7 to 63.3%) (11). Since data on VRC distribution into human tissues have been sparse so far, we determined concentrations in autopsy samples.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Consent was granted by the patients' relatives. Tissue samples were obtained during routine autopsy from eight patients who had died at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) during VRC treatment. The patients' characteristics and data on VRC therapy are displayed in Table 1; routine laboratory values are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 1.
Patienta | Sex | Age (yr) | VRC administrationb | Dosec |
Therapy day | Interval between last VRC administration and death (h) | CRRTd | IFI definitione | Diagnosisf | Interval between death and sampling (h) | Cause of death | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily (mg) | By wt (mg/kg) | Cumulative (mg) | |||||||||||
1 | Female | 58 | i.v. | 200 (single) | 3.33 (single) | 200 | 1 | 36.0 | − | Proven | Pancreatitis, liver failure, COPD, CMP, and Candida sepsis | 13 | Liver failure, pancreatitis |
2 | Male | 52 | os | 300 q24h | 1.85 q24h | 2,500 | 6 | 18.0 | + | Possible | Sepsis, pneumonia, ARF, and ALL | 12 | Septic shock |
3 | Female | 57 | i.v. | 300 q12h | 2.63 q12h | 4,800 | 8 | 8.5 | + | Probable | Sepsis, ARF, GvHD, and AML | 21 | Septic shock |
4 | Male | 35 | os | 200 q12h | 2.94 q12h | 3,800 | 10 | 12.0 | − | Possible | Sepsis, pneumonia, DLBCL, and St. p. alloSCT | 62 | Septic shock |
5 | Male | 67 | i.v. | 300 q12h | 3.70 q12h | 2,500 | 4 | 41.7 | + | Probable | Sepsis, ARF, LF, DM, CVD | 10 | Septic shock |
6 | Male | 47 | i.v. | 200 q12h | 3.77 q12h | 10,000 | 25 | 85.0 | + | Possible | Sepsis, pneumonia, ARF, and multiple myeloma | 60 | Septic shock, multiorgan failure |
7 | Male | 24 | i.v. | 300 q12h | 4.00 q12h | 3,500 | 6 | 5.5 | − | Possible | Sepsis, pneumonia, and Hodgkin's disease | 66 | Respiratory failure |
8 | Male | 75 | i.v. | 350 q12h | 4.17 q12h | 7,500 | 10 | 25.0 | + | Probable | Sepsis, pneumonia, ARF, and oropharynx cancer | 26 | Septic shock |
Median | 55 | 300 | 3.52 | 3,650 | 7 | 21.5 | 23.5 | ||||||
Interquartile range | 22 | 100 | 1.1 | 3,650 | 5 | 28.6 | 48.5 |
Patient 1 received only a single-dose of VRC. Patient 2 received VRC every 24 h because of hepatic impairment. In patient 3 (body weight, 114 kg; body mass index, 40.4), the dosage was guided by the adjusted body weight.
i.v., intravenous; os, oral suspension.
q12h, dose administered every 12; q24h, dose administered every 24 h.
CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy. +, patient on CRRT; −, patient off CRRT.
IFI, invasive fungal infection. The definition of IFI is based on EORTC-MSG criteria, including the following clinical mycological criteria and host factors (7): microbiology for patient 1, Candida glabrata from central venous line and Candida tropicalis in bile; patient 3, A. fumigatus in bronchoalveolar lavage; patient 5, A. fumigatus in bronchial aspirate and C. glabrata from central venous line; patient 8, mycelium (and C. glabrata) in bronchoalveolar lavage; patients 2, 4, 6, and 7, no microbiological or histopathological findings of a fungal infection. There was postmortem histopathological confirmation of proven or probable IFI in patients 1 (lung, kidney, and pancreas), 3 (lung), and 5 (lung). All detected pathogens were VRC sensitive: the MIC for A. fumigatus was <4 μg/ml, and the MIC for C. glabrata was <2 μg/ml.
CMP, cardiomyopathy; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; St. p. allo SCT, status post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation; ARF, acute renal failure; LF, liver failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVD, cardiovascular disease; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; GvHD, graft versus host disease; AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
TABLE 2.
Patient | Laboratory resulta |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creatinine (mg/dl) | Urea (mg/dl) | Bilirubin (mg/dl) | AST (U/liter) | ALT (U/liter) | GGT (U/liter) | PT (%) | WBC (109 cells/liter) | Hb (g/liter) | PLT (109 cells/liter) | |
Baseline testing | ||||||||||
1 | 0.40 | 46.6 | 6.12 | 55 | 40 | 1,317 | 86 | 27.0 | 95 | 185 |
2 | 0.88 | 69.7 | 11.00 | 60 | 149 | 686 | 70 | 10.6 | 77 | 106 |
3 | 0.73 | 60.8 | 9.75 | 61 | 50 | 148 | 50 | 11.8 | 97 | 24 |
4 | 1.47 | 83.2 | 0.95 | 20 | 40 | 480 | 90 | 7.1 | 99 | 21 |
5 | 1.12 | 76.1 | 8.63 | 235 | 214 | 2,534 | 72 | 9.1 | 79 | 136 |
6 | 0.68 | 81.1 | 1.14 | 33 | 22 | 232 | 76 | 4.5 | 89 | 21 |
7 | 0.64 | 47.1 | 0.28 | 15 | 9 | 35 | 90 | 16.9 | 91 | 241 |
8 | 0.92 | 62.0 | 0.93 | 50 | 40 | 433 | 77 | 5.2 | 91 | 296 |
Median | 0.81 | 65.9 | 3.63 | 53 | 40 | 457 | 77 | 9.9 | 91 | 121* |
Interquartile range | 0.36 | 24.7 | 8.25 | 34 | 69 | 812 | 17 | 8.2 | 12 | 191 |
Final testing | ||||||||||
1 | 0.40 | 46.6 | 6.12 | 55 | 40 | 1,317 | 86 | 27.0 | 95 | 185 |
2 | 1.99 | 106.7 | 9.29 | 221 | 109 | 1,129 | 67 | 13.5 | 84 | 15 |
3 | 0.62 | 80.5 | 15.33 | 107 | 75 | 180 | 51 | 9.5 | 101 | 12 |
4 | 0.98 | 57.1 | 3.45 | 43 | 66 | 338 | 89 | 7.0 | 74 | 18 |
5 | 0.89 | 60.5 | 7.93 | 205 | 186 | 1,827 | 70 | 6.2 | 87 | 112 |
6 | 1.53 | 183.1 | 0.46 | 31 | 20 | 209 | 108 | 3.1 | 73 | 28 |
7 | 3.07 | 250.7 | 0.36 | 1,079 | 667 | 102 | 25 | 39.9 | 108 | 108 |
8 | 2.45 | 100.5 | 1.00 | 56 | 29 | 656 | 82 | 6.6 | 88 | 177 |
Median | 1.26 | 90.5 | 4.79 | 82 | 71 | 497 | 76 | 8.25 | 88 | 82* |
Interquartile range | 1.47 | 86.1 | 7.88 | 164 | 113 | 1,029 | 29 | 13.9 | 19 | 128 |
The results from routine laboratory tests on the first day of VRC treatment (baseline testing) and final routine laboratory test results are shown as follows: serum creatinine, normal range, 0.51 to 1.17 mg/dl; urea, normal range 18 to 55 mg/dl; plasma bilirubin, normal range, 0.00 to 1.29 mg/dl; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), normal range, 10 to 50 U/liter; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), normal range, 10 to 50 U/liter; γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), normal range, 6 to 71 U/liter; prothrombin time (PT), normal range 70 to 130%; white blood cell (WBC) count, normal range, 4.0 × 109 to 10.0 × 109 cells/liter; hemoglobin (Hb), normal range, 120 to 177 g/liter; and platelet (PTL) count, normal range, 150 × 109 to 380 × 109 cells/liter. *, significant differences between the first and last testings (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). No significant increases in liver and renal function tests were observed during VRC therapy. Since all patients were on sedoanalgesia, neurotoxicity of VRC could not be assessed.
VRC (Vfend; Pfizer) had been administered for possible, probable, or proven invasive aspergillosis intravenously (six patients) or as an oral suspension (two patients) at the standard dose. Aliquots (∼7 g) were taken from lung, brain, liver, spleen, kidneys, and myocardium and were stored at −80°C. After thawing, samples were homogenized (Ultraturrax T25; Germany) and purified by C18 solid-phase extraction. VRC was quantified by the high-performance liquid chromatography method by Khoschsorur et al. (14), with some modifications, using a Zorbax 300SB-C18 analytical column, UV detection (λ = 255 nm), and a mixture of sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer, acetonitrile, and methanol (35:45:20 [vol/vol]) as the mobile phase. The detection limit was 0.25 μg/g. The intraday precision, interday precision, and accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) were 4.2% ± 3.7%, 8.8% ± 5.2%, and 7.4% ± 9.6%, respectively. The concentrations were assessed by means of a linear standard curve (R = 0.999), obtained by external standards comprising respective bovine tissues spiked with VRC. The mean VRC recovery was 80%.
Table 3 displays the VRC concentrations in the different tissue samples. VRC was shown to penetrate well into tissues, with high variability. In patient 1, VRC was detectable even after a low single dose in all tissues but brain and myocardium. Tissue drug levels of all the other patients exceeded those achieved in patient 1. In patient 7 (daily dose of 600 mg for 6 days of VRC treatment), the highest concentrations were achieved in most tissue samples. He also exhibited the highest values in liver and renal function tests. No difference in VRC levels was found between different areas of the lung, nor were there discrepancies between cerebral cortex, hippocampus, nucleus caudatus, medulla oblongata, and cerebellum.
TABLE 3.
Patient | VRC concn (μg/ml) ina: |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lung | Brain | Liver | Spleen | Kidney | Myocardium | |
1b | 0.74 (0.72-0.76) | <0.25 | 2.14 (1.86-2.42) | 1.31 (1.29-1.34) | 1.97 (1.69-2.26) | <0.25 |
2 | 4.44 (3.64-5.20) | 1.67 (1.38-2.06) | 6.28 (6.22-6.34) | 5.93 | 6.05 (5.99-6.10) | 2.04 (1.96-2.13) |
3 | 6.57 (6.12-6.78) | 6.54 (5.77-6.95) | 19.83 (19.58-20.08) | 5.72 (5.60-5.84) | 4.88 (4.83-4.92) | 7.55 (6.53-8.57) |
4 | 1.98 (1.47-2.04) | 3.36 (3.08-3.56) | 4.21 (3.67-4.76) | 2.95 (2.92-2.99) | 6.89 (6.84-6.93) | 2.44 (2.27-2.62) |
5 | 5.94 (4.14-7.86) | 2.27 (2.25-3.79) | 8.69 (7.44-9.95) | 2.22 (2.22-2.22) | 2.89 (2.76-3.02) | 3.17 (3.10-3.23) |
6 | 6.59 (4.74-9.38) | 2.72 (2.57-3.35) | 2.98 (2.83-3.12) | 6.10 (5.46-6.74) | 8.89 (8.64-9.13) | 13.47 (13.11-13.84) |
7 | 20.26 (19.82-20.87) | 27.72 (26.78-34.70) | 35.53 (35.04-36.03) | 18.73 (17.98-19.47) | 13.58 (11.10-16.05) | 25.79 (25.54-26.05) |
8 | 13.68 (12.04-15.07) | 20.09 (17.43-23.13 | 40.04 (37.77-42.31) | 14.27 (13.71-14.83) | 14.81 (13.55-16.08) | 19.85 (19.53-20.18) |
Median | 6.26 | 3.41 | 6.89 | 5.60 | 6.47 | 7.55 |
Interquartile range | 7.87 | 16.72 | 24.16 | 11.49 | 6.19 | 16.91 |
Shown are median VRC concentrations (with ranges in parentheses). Multiple sampling was performed from different sites as follows: lung, four samples (upper and lower lobe, left and right); brain, five samples (cortex, hippocampus, nucleus caudatus, medulla oblongata, and cerebellum); liver, two samples from different sites; spleen, two samples from different sites; kidney, two samples (left and right); and myocardium, two samples (ventricular septum and anterior wall).
Patient 1 received only a single dose of VRC.
After multiple dosing, VRC levels in the liver correlated with the daily doses (R = 0.79, P = 0.03; in the other organs, R was between 0.38 and 0.64, P > 0.05), but not with the cumulative dose or the interval between the last administration and death. There was no significant difference in tissue concentrations between patients on and off renal replacement therapy. No signs of VRC toxicity could be observed (Table 2).
Invasive aspergillosis most frequently affects the respiratory tract and the central nervous system. The myocardium, the liver, and the spleen are further target organs of invasive fungal infections. We found mean VRC tissue concentrations that exceed therapeutic plasma levels (∼2.0 to 5.5 μg/ml) (19, 22) and the MICs for Aspergillus species (∼0.25 to 2 μg/ml) (15). However, the significance of in vivo target site concentrations in relation to in vitro MICs is controversial considering clinical efficacy.
The lack of therapeutic VRC monitoring precluded a comparison with plasma drug levels. The limited number of patients, differences in underlying diseases, including hepatic and renal function, as well as varying cumulative VRC doses and variable intervals between the last VRC administration and death of the patient are further limitations of our study. Agonal or postmortem changes in VRC tissue concentrations cannot be ruled out completely, although VRC was found to be stable in tissue at 4°C for at least 72 h. Between the tissue drug concentrations and death-to-sampling interval, no correlation was observed. Free VRC and protein-bound VRC were not separated by our assay. The tissue samples consisted of various compartments that are potential targets of fungal invasion, such as different cells, extracellular matrix, and blood vessels (18). However, with our method we could not study the VRC distribution on a cellular level.
In pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of lung transplant recipients, VRC levels were between 0.3 and 83.3 μg/ml (3). In ELF of healthy volunteers, mean levels amounted to 10.1 to 48.3 μg/ml; in alveolar macrophages, mean levels were 10.3 to 20.6 μg/ml (5). Thus, the mean VRC concentration we found in lung tissue was somewhat lower than that in ELF. In vitro incubation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes with 2 μg/ml of VRC resulted in intracellular levels of ∼15 μg/ml (1). Relatively small amounts of VRC (0.7 to 4.4 μg/ml) were recovered from pleural fluid (17, 21, 23). VRC penetration into cerebrospinal fluid appears to be variable, yielding levels of 0.08 to 3.93 μg/ml (6, 16). Cerebral VRC concentrations had been determined previously in autopsy samples from two patients where 11.8 and 58.5 μg/g were measured and, thus, which exceed the levels we measured in our study population (16). In a brain abscess, 1.2 to 1.4 μg/g was reached by oral intake of 4 mg/kg twice daily (8). In contrast, none of our patients presented with cerebral mycosis. Studies of chickens and horses revealed remarkable interspecies differences in tissue penetration of VRC (2, 4, 20). In rats, free extracellular lung concentrations reached ∼2.5 μg/ml after a single dose (13).
Fluconazole, the ancestor drug of VRC, has been found to achieve high levels in various tissues, including the brain (25). In contrast, amphotericin B preparations accumulate in liver and spleen but achieve only low levels in brain and myocardium (26). Unlike with VRC, amphotericin B levels in lung tissue are much higher than in ELF (28). In comparison with amphotericin B, VRC therapy of invasive aspergillosis achieved a superior clinical outcome (12). Echinocandins displayed a tissue distribution similar to that of amphotericin B in animal studies (9, 10, 24).
In conclusion, treatment with VRC at standard doses yields concentrations above the MICs of relevant fungal pathogens in various frequently affected tissues. The significance of target site levels of antifungals for the clinical response should be addressed by adequately powered clinical trials.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Gregor Mikuz, Andrea Brunner, Christian Ensinger, Jens Krugmann, Hans Maier, Patrizia Moser, Ralf Rieker, Consolato Sergi, Irmgard Verdorfer, and Bettina Zelger, Institute of Pathology, Innsbruck Medical University, for providing the tissue samples.
We thank Pfizer, Austria, for financial support.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 15 November 2010.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ballesta, S., I. Garcia, E. J. Perea, and A. Pascual. 2005. Uptake and intracellular activity of voriconazole in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:785-787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burhenne, J., W. E. Haefeli, M. Hess, and A. Scope. 2008. Pharmacokinetics, tissue concentrations, and safety of the antifungal agent voriconazole in chickens. J. Avian Med. Surg. 22:199-207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Capitano, B., et al. 2006. Intrapulmonary penetration of voriconazole in patients receiving an oral prophylactic regimen. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1878-1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Colitz, C. M., et al. 2007. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole following intravenous and oral administration and body fluid concentrations of voriconazole following repeated oral administration in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 68:1115-1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crandon, J. L., et al. 2009. Bronchopulmonary disposition of intravenous voriconazole and anidulafungin given in combination to healthy adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:5102-5107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Denes, E., N. Pichon, M. Debette-Gratien, B. Bouteille, and J. M. Gaulier. 2004. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in the cerebrospinal fluid of an immunocompromised patient with a brain abscess due to Aspergillus fumigatus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:603-604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Pauw, B., et al. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1813-1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elter, T., et al. 2006. Voriconazole brain tissue levels in rhinocerebral aspergillosis in a successfully treated young woman. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 28:262-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Groll, A. H., et al. 2001. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2845-2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Groll, A. H., et al. 2001. Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the antifungal echinocandin lipopeptide micafungin (FK463) in rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3322-3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Han, K., et al. 2010. Bioavailability and population pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in lung transplant recipients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4424-4431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Herbrecht, R., et al. 2002. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:408-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Joukhadar, C., et al. 2009. Concentrations of voriconazole in healthy and inflamed lung in rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:2684-2686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khoschsorur, G., F. Fruehwirth, and S. Zelzer. 2005. Isocratic high-performance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection for simultaneous determination of levels of voriconazole and itraconazole and its hydroxy metabolite in human serum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3569-3571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lass-Florl, C., et al. 2008. Activities of antifungal agents against yeasts and filamentous fungi: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3637-3641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lutsar, I., S. Roffey, and P. Troke. 2003. Voriconazole concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue of guinea pigs and immunocompromised patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 37:728-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsuda, T., et al. 2010. A case of Aspergillus empyema successfully treated with combination therapy of voriconazole and micafungin: excellent penetration of voriconazole and micafungin into pleural fluid. Intern. Med. 49:1163-1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller, M., A. dela Peña, and H. Derendorf. 2004. Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: distribution in tissue. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1441-1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pascual, A., et al. 2008. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:201-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Passler, N. H., et al. 2010. Distribution of voriconazole in seven body fluids of adult horses after repeated oral dosing. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 33:35-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poupelin, J. C., et al. 2006. Pericardial and pleural diffusion of voriconazole during disseminated invasive aspergillosis: report of a case with successful outcome. Intensive Care Med. 32:939-940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smith, J., et al. 2006. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1570-1572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stern, J. B., P. Girard, and R. Caliandro. 2004. Pleural diffusion of voriconazole in a patient with Aspergillus fumigatus empyema thoracis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stone, J. A., et al. 2004. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:815-823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thaler, F., et al. 1995. Fluconazole penetration in cerebral parenchyma in humans at steady state. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1154-1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vogelsinger, H., et al. 2006. Amphotericin B tissue distribution in autopsy material after treatment with liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:1153-1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walsh, T. J., et al. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:327-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weiler, S., et al. 2009. Pulmonary epithelial lining fluid concentrations after use of systemic amphotericin B lipid formulations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4934-4937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]