Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574–580. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524

Table 2.

Comparison of Variables Between the 2 Groups

Laparoscopic Appendectomy (n = 48) Open Appendectomy (n = 52) P Value*
Preoperative Histopathological and Ultrasound Findings

Operative
    Inflamed appendix 40 (83.3%) 41 (78.8%) 0.61
    Normal looking appendix 8 (16.7%) 11 (21.2%)
Histopathological
    Inflamed appendix 43 (89.6%) 45 (88.5%) NS
    Normal looking appendix 5 (10.4%) 7 (11.5%)
Ultrasound
    Inflamed appendix 30 (62.5%) 41 (78.8%) 0.08
    Normal looking appendix 18 (37.5%) 11 (21.2%)
Postoperative Subjective Outcome*

Operative time (min) 54.9 ± 14.7 31.6 ± 12.6 < 0.001§
Parenteral analgesics (doses) 1.0 ± 0.5 (1–3) 1.5 ± 0.6 (2–5) 0.001
Oral analgesics (doses) 2.5 ± 0.8 (2–4) 3.0 ± 1.5 (2– 6) 0.05
Time to oral intake (hrs) 20.1 ± 2.9 (15–25) 22.0 ± 4.7 (15–30) 0.02
Hospital stay (d) 1.4 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 1.0 < 0.001§
Returned to normal activity (d) 12.6 ± 3.3 19.1 ± 3.1 < 0.001§
Postoperative Complications

Minor
    Vomiting 9 (18.8%) 27 (51.9%) 0.001
    Paralytic ileus 3 (6.3%) 12 (21.2%) 0.04
    Wound infection 3 (6.3%) 7 (13.7%) 0.32
Major
    Wound dehiscence 0 1 (1.9%) NS
    Intra abdominal abscess 2 (4.2%) 1 (1.9%) NS
    Small bowel obstruction 1 (2.1%) 1 (1.9%) NS
*

P value <0.05 is statistically significant.

NS = Not significant.

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range).

§

P value is statistically highly significant.