Skip to main content
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease logoLink to International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
. 2011 Jan 13;6:73–81. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S15882

Economic burden of chronic bronchitis in the United States: a retrospective case-control study

Christopher M Blanchette 1,, Melissa H Roberts 1, Hans Petersen 1, Anand A Dalal 2, Douglas W Mapel 3
PMCID: PMC3034282  PMID: 21311695

Abstract

Background

Chronic bronchitis (CB) is often misdiagnosed or diagnosed at a later stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined how this later diagnosis may impact health care costs and utilization during the 12 months prior to and 24 months post initial CB diagnosis.

Methods

This retrospective case-control analysis used claims data from a large US database from July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2007. Patients with CB aged 40 years and older were propensity matched (N = 11,674) to patients without evidence of COPD or asthma by demographics, CB diagnosis quarter/year, and comorbidities. Group differences were assessed using Student’s t-test and Pearson chi-square test statistics.

Results

Six months prediagnosis, CB patients had higher frequencies of any hospitalization (9.6%, 6.7%; P < 0.05), emergency department/urgent care visits (13.3%, 6.7%; P < 0.05), and prescriptions (97.3%, 94.1%; P < 0.05). Six months postdiagnosis, CB patients had 5.6 times more hospitalizations (P < 0.05) and 3.1 times more emergency department/urgent care visits (P < 0.05) compared with controls. Mean total costs (US$) for CB patients 12 months prediagnosis were significantly higher than controls (months 12–7: $4212, $3826; P < 0.05; months 6–1: $5289, $4285; P < 0.05). CB patients had higher mean total costs ($8919; P < 0.05) 6 months postdiagnosis. Costs remained $2429 higher for CB patients 19–24 months postdiagnosis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Health care costs and utilization among CB patients are increased both prior to diagnosis and during the 2 years postdiagnosis. This study suggests that not accurately diagnosing CB early has a substantial impact on health care costs, and that the economic burden for CB patients remains elevated even after adjustment for comorbidities associated with COPD.

Keywords: chronic bronchitis, burden, economic, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Introduction

Chronic bronchitis (CB), an inflammatory condition that affects the central bronchi, is one of two main lung diseases by which patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are characterized. Excessive mucus secretion differentiates it from the second, emphysema, which is characterized by permanent enlargement of lung airways and destruction of the walls of the alveoli, making breathing difficult.1 Other symptoms of CB related to lung inflammation and heavy mucus production include cough, production of sputum, and dyspnea.1 In 2008, more than 9.8 million Americans reported having a CB diagnosis.2 While many patients with COPD may suffer from both conditions, the courses of the diseases and response to treatment are frequently different; separate studies of outcomes between the two could assist in optimizing care for these patients.

Estimated annual expenditures for CB treatment total US$11.7 billion, with hospitalizations accounting for US$6 billion of the total costs.3 There are limited studies that examine the costs associated with CB, but research has shown that hospitalizations for acute CB exacerbations accounted for 46%–90% of the costs associated with treatment.4 The diminished quality of life experienced by COPD patients is well documented and suggests that earlier detection, treatment, and reduction of exacerbations may have a substantial economic and psychosocial impact on patients.513

The chronic cough and sputum production associated with CB often predates the development of airflow limitation.14 The GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of COPD recommend early identification of patients with symptoms of CB in order to begin intervention at the earliest stage of COPD.14 Unfortunately, CB symptoms may be dismissed by patients as “smoker’s cough”, or physicians may misdiagnose CB as acute bronchitis or asthma.15,16 Once CB is diagnosed and treatment has commenced, many patients have progressed into more severe COPD stages, resulting in higher consumption of health care resources and increased complexity in clinical management.

Prior research demonstrated higher utilization rates of health care resources for COPD patients when compared with a control population during the 12 months preceding initial COPD diagnosis.17 Utilization trends indicated an increasing use of resources in terms of medical services and pharmacy prescriptions up to the COPD diagnosis, particularly in the final month before diagnosis.17 In addition, total costs for COPD patients have been shown to be higher up to 2 years prior to diagnosis.18 To determine if these trends were apparent for the subset of COPD patients diagnosed with CB, we examined health care utilization and costs for 12 months prior to CB diagnosis and 24 months post diagnosis.

Data and methods

Study design and data source

This case–control analysis used data from the PharMetrics Integrated Database, which contains continuously updated information from enrollment files and facility, professional services, and outpatient pharmacy claims from more than 90 participating US health plans, representing more than 55 million patients. The data include dates of service and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes, participating plan payment and billed charge information. The dataset is deidentified and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant.

Sample

CB and control cohorts were selected using medical claims data for services provided between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2007. The CB cohort consisted of patients with an initial primary or secondary diagnosis claim of CB (ICD-9-CM codes 491.xx), considered the index event, during the observation period described above. All study patients were required to be aged 40 or older and to have had continuous enrollment in a health plan for at least 12 months prior to the initial diagnosis (index date). Thus the earliest index date was July 1, 2004. In addition to the preindex health plan enrollment period, subjects were also required to remain enrolled in a health plan for a minimum of 1 year, to have at least one prescription claim in both the pre- and postindex observational time periods (to provide evidence of pharmaceutical insurance coverage) and to have no prior claims for any COPD-related outpatient visit.

Patients in the potential control cohort had at least 36 months of continuous enrollment between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2007. Index dates were randomly assigned to control cohort subjects following the first 12 months of continuous enrollment. Patients in the potential control cohort had no evidence of bronchitis, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, asthma, or unspecified COPD (ICD-9-CM codes 490.xx, 491.xx, 492.xx, 493.xx, 496.xx) during the 12 months prior to the randomly assigned index date, and also had to have at least one medical services claim and one prescription claim pre- and postindex date. Patients with serious lung conditions other than COPD or asthma were excluded from both cohorts.19 The likelihood of a CB diagnosis was calculated by a logistic regression that controlled for demographics (age, sex, and geographic region), quarter and year of index date, and comorbidities (Table 1). CB patients were propensity matched one-to-one to control subjects using the greedy match algorithm, a method that derives matched samples using nearest available pair matching.20,21 CB cases were matched to controls according to age, geographic region, quarter of year of index date, and selected comorbidities to reduce selection bias. Comorbid conditions were identified based on the classifications by Elixhauser et al22 sleep apnea and heart disease (rheumatic heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and unspecified cardiovascular disease) were also included.

Table 1.

Case patients and control subject characteristics before and after propensity matching

Characteristic Pre-matching
Post-matching
Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Number of patients 11937 280264 11674 11674
Age, yrs (mean, SD) 61.8 12.2 57.2 10.9 61.5 12.1 61.8 12.1
Sex
 Male 4944 (41.4%) 119264 (42.6%) 4832 (41.4%) 5017 (43.0%)b
 Female 6993 (58.6%) 161000 (57.4%) 6842 (58.6%) 6657 (57.0%)b
Region
 Midwest 2093 (17.5%) 77533 (27.7%) 2082 (17.8%) 2010 (17.2%)
 Northeast 4515 (37.8%) 67901 (24.2%) 4334 (37.1%) 4308 (36.9%)
 South 3315 (27.8%) 71932 (25.7%) 3269 (28.0%) 3301 (28.3%)
 West 2014 (16.9%) 62898 (22.4%) 1989 (17.0%) 2055 (17.6%)
Quarter and year of the index date
 Q3-2004 1210 (10.1%) 48236 (17.2%) 1201 (10.3%) 1227) (10.5%
 Q4-2004 1677 (14.0%) 50105 (17.9%) 1657 (14.2%) 1664 (14.3%)
 Q1-2005 2337 (19.6%) 50674 (18.1%) 2288 (19.6%) 2254 (19.3%)
 Q2-2005 1472 (12.3%) 26573 (9.5%) 1438 (12.3%) 1440 (12.3%)
 Q3-2005 1140 (9.6%) 27554 (9.8%)a 1113 (9.5%) 1144 (9.8%)
 Q4-2005 1499 (12.6%) 27028 (9.6%) 1465 (12.5%) 1474 (12.6%)
 Q1-2006 1588 (13.3%) 25707 (9.2%) 1524 (13.1%) 1529 (13.1%)
 Q2-2006 1014 (8.5%) 24387 (8.7%)a 988 (8.5%) 942 (8.1%)
Comorbid conditions
 Asthma* 2722 (22.8%) 2660 (22.8%)
 Alcohol abuse 152 (1.3%) 1498 (0.5%) 139 (1.2%) 135 (1.2%)
 Blood loss anemia 121 (1.0%) 1406 (0.5%) 108 (0.9%) 96 (0.8%)
 Cardiac arrythmia 1348 (11.3%) 14709 (5.2%) 1210 (10.4%) 1243 (10.6%)
 Congestive heart failure 1083 (9.1%) 4979 (1.8%) 856 (7.3%) 785 (6.7%)
 Coagulopathy 245 (2.1%) 2457 (0.9%) 217 (1.9%) 204 (1.7%)
 Cardiovascular disease 185 (1.5%) 2041 (0.7%) 168 (1.4%) 186 (1.6%)
 Deficiency anemias 1005 (8.4%) 14636 (5.2%) 921 (7.9%) 949 (8.1%)
 Depression 970 (8.1%) 16865 (6.0%) 928 (7.9%) 929 (8.0%)
 Diabetes 2380 (19.9%) 37144 (13.3%) 2247 (19.2%) 2265 (19.4%)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders 792 (6.6%) 7268 (2.6%) 685 (5.9%) 676 (5.8%)
 Hypertension (complicated) 600 (5.0%) 5605 (2.0%) 531 (4.5%) 531 (4.5%)
 Hypertension (uncomplicated) 5867 (49.1%) 105482 (37.6%) 5644 (48.3%) 5671 (48.6%)
 Hypothyroidism 1238 (10.4%) 26781 (9.6%) 1199 (10.3%) 1245 (10.7%)
 Ischemic heart disease 2411 (20.2%) 25481 (9.1%) 2215 (19.0%) 2293 (19.6%)
 Liver disease 235 (2.0%) 3278 (1.2%) 213 (1.8%) 212 (1.8%)
 Obesity 543 (4.5%) 7678 (2.7%) 500 (4.3%) 556 (4.8%)
 Other neurological disorders 421 (3.5%) 5777 (2.1%) 381 (3.3%) 383 (3.3%)
 Paralysis 89 (0.7%) 906 (0.3%) 77 (0.7%) 87 (0.7%)
 Peripheral vascular disorders 950 (8.0%) 3711 (1.3%) 838 (7.2%) 837 (7.2%)
 Psychoses 706 (5.9%) 10368 (3.7%) 670 (5.7%) 677 (5.8%)
 Pulmonary circulation disorders 139 (1.2%) 560 (0.2%) 92 (0.8%) 88 (0.8%)
 Renal failure 357 (3.0%) 3209 (1.1%) 296 (2.5%) 277 (2.4%)
 Rheumatic heart failure 7 (0.1%) 37 (0.0%) 4 (0.0%) 4 (0.0%)
 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular 525 (4.4%) 8154 (2.9%) 503 (4.3%) 522 (4.5%)
 Obstructive sleep apnea 628 (5.3%) 7919 (2.8%) 580 (5.0%) 580 (5.0%)
 Peptic ulcer excluding bleeding 120 (1.0%) 1486 (0.5%) 115 (1.0%) 112 (1.0%)
 Valvular disease 1032 (8.6%) 11913 (4.3%) 924 (7.9%) 972 (8.3%)
 Weight loss 51 (0.4%) 306 (0.1%) 37 (0.3%) 41 (0.4%)

Notes: Propensity score calculated as probability of chronic bronchitis diagnosis using a logistic regression controlling for demographics (age, sex, region), quarter and year of the index date, and comorbid conditions listed.

*

Asthma was specifically excluded in the control population;

a

No signficant difference between chronic bronchitis (CB) cohort and control cohort at level of 0.05;

b

Signficant difference between CB cohort and control cohort at level of 0.05. Q1, July 1 to Sept 30, Q2, Oct 1 to Dec 31, Q3, Jan 1 to March 31, Q4, April 1 to June 30.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Measures

Utilization and costs due to all causes in both the pre- and postindex periods were categorized by inpatient hospitalization (IP), emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC), outpatient visits (OP), and pharmacy fills. Utilization and costs occurring on the index date were included in the first 6-month period postindex. We defined costs as the amount paid by the health plan; costs paid by other sources were not included. Costs for IP, OP, and ED/UC were aggregated as medical services costs. Pharmacy costs were kept separate; total costs were the sum of medical services and pharmacy costs. Each category for both cohorts was analyzed for six time periods of 6 months each: two in the preindex period and four during the postindex period.

Analysis

Descriptive analysis was used for all demographic, patient comorbidity, and outcome variables. Continuous variables were reported as means, standard deviations, and medians. Binary and categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages.

Means and frequencies for utilization and costs were calculated and compared for all outcome categories in both the pre- and postindex periods. Covariate adjustment was incorporated through the use of a propensity score matching technique as previously described. The Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and the Pearson chi-square test for binary use variables. All statistical tests were two-sided with a 0.05 level of significance. Analyses were conducted with SAS software (version 9.1.3 for Windows; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

There were initially 182,169 patients who had a COPD diagnosis at any time; after selection criteria were applied, 11,937 patients met criteria for the CB cohort. A 10% random sample of possible control subjects with 3 or more years of continuous enrollment was selected, of whom 282,078 met the control cohort selection criteria. These patients were randomly reduced to a pool of 65,654 control patients. Propensity score matching was used to match CB patients to control patients on a one-to-one basis, resulting in two cohorts of 11,674 each.

Prior to matching, the two cohorts exhibited significant differences in all matching characteristics with the exception of two of the index date quarter variables (Table 1). After matching, the CB patient cohort and control patient cohort exhibited a significant difference only in the percentage of each population that was male (CB = 41.4%, control = 43.0%; P = 0.0142). The cohorts were similar with respect to comorbidities, geographic region, mean age, and quarter in which the index date occurred.

After matching, the mean age of patients in the CB cohort was 61.5 years; for the controls, 61.8 years. Patients were predominantly from the Northeast (37%) and female (57.8%). The most prevalent comorbidities in each cohort were: uncomplicated hypertension (48.5%), diabetes (19.3%), ischemic heart disease (19.3%), arrhythmia (10.5%), and hypothyroidism (10.5%), shown in Table 1. Among the CB cohort, 22.8% had a history of asthma in addition to their CB diagnosis.

There was a decrease in the number of patients with continuous enrollment beginning 13 months after the index date. Approximately 23% of the CB patients were lost to follow-up during months 13–18, and another 25% in the 19–24 month period after the index date. For the final 6-month observation period (months 19–24), there were 6128 CB patients and 6203 control patients.

As shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, from 1 year and up to 6 months prior to the CB diagnosis there were no differences between the cohorts with respect to the percentage of patients having any IP visit; however, the CB cohort had a higher percentage having any ED/UC visit (9.5%, 6.4%; P < 0.05), and any pharmacy use (93.4%, 91.5%; P < 0.05), while having a lower percentage with any OP visit (90.5%, 92.9%; P < 0.05). In the next 6 months, which was the 6 months immediately prior to diagnosis, patients in the CB cohort, compared with the control cohort, had a higher percentage having any IP visit (9.6%, 6.7%; P < 0.05), and again, higher percentages for any ED/UC visit (13.3%, 6.7%; P < 0.05), and any pharmacy prescription (97.3%, 94.1%; P < 0.05). Percentages of patients having any OP visit were identical for the two cohorts during the 6 months immediately prior to CB diagnosis.

Table 2.

Chronic bronchitis patients and control subjects with any health care events

Subjects w/any utilization Preindex
Postindex
Months prior to index
Months after index
7–12* 1–6 1–6 7–12 13–18** 19–24
Hospitalization (IP)
 Chronic bronchitis 6.1% 9.6% 30.4% 10.5% 11.0% 10.4%
 Control 6.2% 6.7% 5.4% 6.1% 5.2% 5.7%
ED/UC visit
 Chronic bronchitis 9.5% 13.3% 20.7% 12.2% 12.0% 12.3%
 Control 6.4% 6.7% 6.6% 6.8% 6.6% 6.5%
Outpatient visit (OP)
 Chronic bronchitis 90.5% 93.8% 99.7% 95.2% 94.7% 94.2%
 Control 92.9% 93.8% 94.0% 93.7% 91.7% 91.3%
Pharmacy use
 Chronic bronchitis 93.4% 97.3% 99.0% 95.2% 92.7% 91.0%
 Control 91.5% 94.1% 93.7% 92.5% 87.7% 85.4%

Notes: All percentages were significantly different at a 0.05 level using a chi-square test except for IP visits in pre-index months 12–7 and OP visits in pre-index months 6–1.

*

N = 11674 CB and controls months 12–1 preindex and months 1–12 postindex;

**

N = 9009 CB, 9305 controls months 13–18 postindex; N = 6128 CB, N = 6203 controls months 19–24 postindex.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Incidence of any utilization for all-cause health care events.

Abbreviations: ED/UC, emergency department/urgent care; IP, inpatient hospitalization; OP, outpatient visits.

During the first 6 months postindex (Figure 1), patients in the CB cohort had 5.6 times more IP visits (30.4%, 5.4%; P < 0.05) and 3.1 times more ED/UC visits (20.7%, 6.6%; P < 0.05). To a lesser degree, OP visits and pharmacy use were also higher for the CB cohort. Utilization rates remained higher for the CB cohort during all four of the 6-month periods postindex, but beginning in the second 6-month postindex period, utilization rates in the CB cohort declined from the highs reached in the first postindex period and remained fairly stable for the remaining observation periods. The control cohort’s utilization rates declined slightly in each of the four postindex periods. Mean number of events were higher for the CB cohort in all time periods, pre- and postindex, compared with the control cohort except for mean OP visits in the 6-month period immediately preceding the CB diagnosis (Table 3, Figure 2).

Table 3.

Total and mean events for chronic bronchitis and control populations

Preindex
Postindex
Months prior to index
Months after index
7–12* 1–6 1–6 7–12 13–18** 19–24
Total events
IP
 Chronic bronchitis 873 1,378 4,687 1,633 1,333 866
 Control 900 973 759 885 593 466
ED/UC visit
 Chronic bronchitis 1,502 2,156 3,552 2,154 1,595 1,078
 Control 962 1,005 968 1,048 767 538
OP
 Chronic bronchitis 99,773 110,543 167,877 129,531 99,122 64,805
 Control 92,485 97,590 94,172 94,695 72,450 48,416
Pharmacy use
 Chronic bronchitis 220,580 237,961 288,189 256,939 192,569 126,730
 Control 148,984 155,404 156,901 157,332 120,687 80,716
Mean events
IP
 Chronic bronchitis 0.07 0.12 0.40 0.14 0.15 0.14
 Control 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.08
ED/UC visit
 Chronic bronchitis 0.13 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18
 Control 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09
OP
 Chronic bronchitis 8.55 9.47 14.38 11.10 11.00 10.58
 Control 7.92 8.36 8.07 8.11 7.79 7.81
Pharmacy use
 Chronic bronchitis 18.90 20.38 24.69 22.01 21.38 20.68
 Control 12.76 13.31 13.44 13.48 12.97 13.01

Notes: Numbers of events were significantly different at a 0.05 level using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test except for IP visits in preindex months 12–7.

*

N = 11674 CB and controls months 12–1 preindex and months 1–12 postindex;

**

N = 9009 CB, 9305 controls months 13–18 postindex; N = 6128 CB, N = 6203 controls months 19–24 post-index.

Abbreviations: ED/UC, emergency department/urgent care; IP, inpatient hospitalization; OP, outpatient visits.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean events for chronic bronchitis and control populations.

Abbreviations: ED/UC, emergency department/urgent care; IP, inpatient hospitalization; OP, outpatient visits.

Mean total costs (US$) for the CB cohort during both preindex periods were significantly higher than for the control cohort (months 12–7: $4212, $3826; P < 0.05; months 6–1: $5289, $4285; P < 0.05). Component costs were also higher, with the exception that there was no difference in medical services costs during the initial 6 months prior to diagnosis (Table 4). CB patients had higher mean total costs ($8919; P < 0.05) in the 6 months postdiagnosis. Costs for both groups then decreased (Figure 3) but for CB patients remained $2429 higher than for control patients 19–24 months postdiagnosis (P < 0.05). Median costs were all significantly higher for the CB cohort (Table 5).

Table 4.

Mean costs (US$) for chronic bronchitis and control populations

Preindex
Postindex
Months prior to index
Months after index
7–12* 1–6 1–6 7–12 13–18** 19–24
Total cost
 Chronic bronchitis $4,212 $5,289 $12,781 $7,101 $7,448 $6,925
 Control $3,826 $4,285 $3,862 $4,070 $4,090 $4,496
Medical services cost
 Chronic bronchitis $3,045 $4,034 $11,193 $5,562 $5,894 $5,415
 Control $3,048 $3,438 $2,957 $3,152 $3,138 $3,520
Pharmacy cost
 Chronic bronchitis $1,167 $1,255 $1,588 $1,539 $1,554 $1,510
 Control $778 $847 $905 $917 $952 $976

Notes: All cost distributions were significantly different at a 0.05 level using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

*

N = 11674 CB and controls months 12–1 preindex and months 1–12 postindex;

**

N = 9009 CB, 9305 controls months 13–18 postindex; N = 6128 CB, N = 6203 controls months 19–24 postindex.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean costs (US$) for chronic bronchitis and control populations.

Table 5.

Median costs (US$) for chronic bronchitis and control populations

Preindex
Postindex
Months prior to index
Months after index
7–12* 1–6 1–6 7–12 13–18** 19–24
Total cost
 Chronic bronchitis $1,559 $1,906 $4,007 $2,251 $2,261 $2,166
 Control $1,163 $1,278 $1,252 $1,292 $1,215 $1,235
Medical services cost
 Chronic bronchitis $591 $791 $2,364 $972 $1,008 $909
 Control $534 $588 $563 $589 $550 $545
Pharmacy cost
 Chronic bronchitis $581 $669 $911 $815 $796 $763
 Control $347 $387 $396 $384 $367 $365

Notes: All cost distributions were significantly different at a 0.05 level using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

*

N = 11674 CB and controls months 12–1 preindex and months 1–12 postindex;

**

N = 9009 CB, 9305 controls months 13–18 postindex; N = 6128 CB, N = 6203 controls months 19–24 postindex.

Discussion

This retrospective observational study demonstrated that total health care utilization and costs for CB patients in the US are significantly greater than for a matched control cohort of patients. This was true for both the 12-month period prior to CB diagnosis and for 2 years after diagnosis. Mean utilization and costs in the CB cohort were seen to increase in the 6 months immediately preceding diagnosis, a similar finding to that of Akazawa et al.17 This prediagnosis trend is commensurate with the gradual progression of COPD.

In the postindex period, the majority of total health care cost differences between the cohorts were for medical services. Patients in the CB cohort incurred approximately US$2000–$2800 more for medical services across three of the 6-month postindex periods. During the same periods, the CB cohort’s pharmacy costs were US$500–$600 higher than the control cohort. After the initial spike following a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, medical services costs declined but remained elevated compared with controls, which may be due to increased utilization related to CB events, but also to non-CB related health events.

Prevalence of various comorbidities has been documented generally in studies of COPD patients, but there is a dearth of information concerning the extent to which comorbid conditions exist in patients with chronic bronchitis. Mapel et al found that in an analysis of a population in which 39% had cardiovascular disease and 13% had diabetes, the presence of comorbid conditions was a better predictor of future costs of COPD patients compared with COPD disease stage as measured by spirometry.23 Similar prevalence rates of comorbidities have been found in other study populations. In a telephone survey of COPD patients, Barr et al found prevalence rates of more than 50% for hypertension and more than 25% for both depression and diabetes.24 A 2005 review of 1090 Canadian patients with COPD levels ranging from asymptomatic to severe identified comorbidity rates of 51% for hypertension, 19% for diabetes, 15% for depression, 13% for peripheral vascular disease, and 10% for asthma.25 Our CB cohort had a higher asthma rate compared with the COPD patients of the Canadian study, 23% versus 10%, respectively; however, in a study of CB patients who were initiating maintenance therapy, Delea et al found an asthma comorbidity rate of 29%, a prevalence rate similar to CB subjects in this analysis.26

Similar to a study of COPD patients by Akazawa and colleagues, our study found higher IP, ED/UC, and pharmacy utilization in the 6 months prior to CB diagnosis; higher ED/UC and pharmacy utilization was also observed even earlier, up to 1 year prediagnosis. The utilization differences became pronounced in the 6 months immediately preceding CB diagnosis, reached an apex during the next 6 months that included the index date (diagnosis), and then decreased. However, during the last three of the 6-month periods postindex, differences in mean medical services and pharmacy costs, as well as mean events, remained at levels of greater magnitude than those shown during both 6-month periods prior to CB diagnosis. This suggests that there is strong evidence that the systemic consequences of chronic bronchitis may play a significant role in driving up total health care utilization and costs among patients with chronic bronchitis.

A strength of our study is that we focused on adults aged 40 years and over, as opposed to an exclusively elderly population. An additional strength is that we examined health care utilization and costs in comparisons of CB and non-CB patients, whereas most of the literature has focused on the broader definition of COPD. A review by Maciewicz et al suggested that the varied aspects of the progression of COPD may be related to the aging process;27 earlier disease identification and treatment initiation may improve patients’ long-term health and economic outcomes, although the total cost savings may be modest due to shorter life expectancy for patients with COPD.28

This retrospective study based on claims data is not without limitations. Foremost among these is that the accuracy of diagnoses could not be verified. The results and conclusions of this study are limited to the population studied and the operational definitions of our variables. The analysis is limited to those with CB who utilize health care services and the representation of CB patients in the database we used of our analysis. The geographical representation in this study differed from what has previously been noted for the USA; that is, high prevalence in the South and Midwest.29 In addition, cost estimates may vary when different databases are used. Data were unavailable on both patient smoking behavior and severity of disease among the CB cohort, thus limiting our findings regarding drivers of resource utilization and cost.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a large enough population sample to facilitate propensity score matching based on comorbidities. Prior studies have not controlled for comorbidity by matching,30 creating potential for residual confounding and other biases in case-control comparisons. Our method allowed for a cleaner assessment of the true impact of CB. The disease burden is greatest during the 6-month period following CB diagnosis, but is also high in periods preceding the diagnosis. In patients diagnosed with chronic bronchitis, compared with patients without evidence of COPD or asthma, health care utilization and costs continue to remain elevated 2 years after diagnosis. This study suggests that not accurately diagnosing CB early may have a substantial impact on health care costs, resulting in a higher economic burden for CB patients than would otherwise be present.

Acknowledgment

Financial support for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (study # ADC111268).

Footnotes

Disclosure

Dr Blanchette has received research support from and served as consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca LP, Sepracor, Viostat, Wyeth, Schering-Plough, Premier, and NovoNordisk. Mrs Roberts has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca LP, Premier, and Wyeth. Mr Petersen has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca LP, Premier, and Wyeth. Dr Dalal is an employee of and owns stock in GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Mapel has received research support from and served as a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca. Susan R Berry, MSW, of Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, was responsible for medical writing and editorial services for this manuscript. Ms Berry has no financial disclosures to report.

References

  • 1.Niewoehner D. Structure-function relationships: the pathophysiology of airflow obstruction. In: Stockley R, Rennard S, Rabe K, Celli B, editors. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pleis J, Lucas J, Ward B. Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2008. Vital Health Stat. 2009;10(242):1–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilson L, Devine E, So K. Direct medical care costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Respir Med. 2000;94(3):204–213. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Halpern M, Higashi M, Bakst A, Schmier J. The economic impact of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in the United States and Canada: a literature review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(4):353–359. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.4.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belfer M, Reardon J. Improving exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109(5):268–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blanchette C, Broder M, Ory C, Chang E, Dalal A. Cost and utilization of COPD and asthma among insured adults in the US. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(6):1385–1392. doi: 10.1185/03007990902875927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Coventry P. Does pulmonary rehabilitation reduce anxiety and depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009;15(2):143–149. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283218318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Habraken J, ter Riet G, Gore J, Greenstone M. Health-related quality of life in end-stage COPD and lung cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37(6):973–981. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Halpern M, Stanford R, Borker R. The burden of COPD in the USA: results from the Confronting COPD survey. Respir Med. 2003;97(Suppl C):S81–89. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(03)80028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hernandez P, Balter M, Bourbeau J, Hodder R. Living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a survey of patients’ knowledge and attitudes. Respir Med. 2009;103(7):1004–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Izquierdo J, Barcina C, Jimenez J, Munoz M, Leal M. Study of the burden on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(1):87–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01936.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Omachi T, Katz P, Yelin E, Gergorich S. Depression and health-related quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med. 2009;122(8):778–793. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rodriguez Gonzalez-Moro J, de Lucas Ramos P, Izquierdo J, Lopez-Muniz Ballesteros B. Impact of COPD on physical disability and daily living activities: EDIP-EPOC I and EDIP-EPOC II studies. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(5):742–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2009. [Accessed 2010 February 16]. www.goldcopd.com/Guidelineitem.asp?1=2&2=1&intId=2003.
  • 15.American Lung Association. Understanding chronic bronchitis. 2010. [Accessed 2010 Feb 16]. Available from http://www.lungusa.org/lung-disease/bronchitischronic/understanding-chronic-bronchitis.
  • 16.Tinkelman D, Price D, Nordyke R, Halbert R. Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over. J Asthma. 2006;43(1):75–80. doi: 10.1080/02770900500448738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akazawa M, Halpern R, Riedel A, Stanford R, Dalal A, Blanchette C. Economic burden prior to COPD diagnosis: a matched case-control study in the United States. Respir Med. 2008;102:1744–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mapel D, Robinson S, Dastani H, Shah H, Phillips A, Lydick E. The direct medical costs of undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Value Health. 2008;11(4):628–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mapel D, Robinson S, Lydick E. A comparison of health-care costs in patients with chronic pulmonary disease using lightweight portable oxygen systems versus traditional compressed-oxygen systems. Respir Care. 2008;53(9):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.D’Agostino R., Jr Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statist Med. 1998;17(19):2265–2281. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parsons L. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using Greedy Matching techniques. 26th Annual SASUser Group International Conference; 2001. pp. 214–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris D, Coffey R. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mapel D, McMillan G, Frost F, et al. Predicting the costs of managing patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2005;99(10):1325–1333. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barr R, Celli B, Mannino D, Petty T. Comorbidities, patient knowledge, and disease management in a national sample of patients with COPD. Am J Med. 2009;122(4):348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bourbeau J, Sebaldt R, Day A, Bouchard J, Kaplan A. Practice patterns in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary practice: the CAGE study. Can Respir J. 2008;15:13–19. doi: 10.1155/2008/173904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Delea T, Hagiwara M, Dalal A, Stanford R, Blanchette C. Healthcare use and costs in patients with chronic bronchitis initiating maintenance therapy with fluticasone/salmeterol versus other inhaled maintenance therapies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(1):1–13. doi: 10.1185/03007990802534020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maciewicz R, Warburton D, Rennard S. Can increased understanding of the rold of lung development and aging drive new advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(7):614–617. doi: 10.1513/pats.200908-094RM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joyce G, Keeler E, Shang B, Goldman D. The lifetime burden of chronic disease among the elderly. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(Suppl 2):W5R18, W5R29. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.r18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.American Lung Association. Trends in COPD (Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema): Morbidity and Mortality. 2010. [Accessed 2010 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.lungusa.org/finding-cures/our-research/trend-reports/copd-trendreport.pdf.
  • 30.Foster T, Miller J, Marton J, Caloyeras J, Russell M, Menzin J. Assessment of the economic burden of COPD in the US: a review and synthesis of the literature. COPD. 2006;3:211–218. doi: 10.1080/15412550601009396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES