Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011 Jan 15;21(2):756–759. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.11.109

A Novel Transition State Analogue Inhibitor of Guanase Based on Azepinomycin Ring Structure: Synthesis and Biochemical Assessment of Enzyme Inhibition

Saibal Chakraborty 1, Niti H Shah 1, James C Fishbein 1, Ramachandra S Hosmane 1,†,*
PMCID: PMC3035156  NIHMSID: NIHMS256626  PMID: 21183343

Abstract

Synthesis and biochemical inhibition studies of a novel transition state analogue inhibitor of guanase bearing the ring structure of azepinomycin have been reported. The compound was synthesized in five steps from a known compound and biochemically screened against the rabbit liver guanase. The compound exhibited competitive inhibition profile with a Ki of 16.7 ± 0.5 µM.

Keywords: synthesis; biochemical screening; Inhibition of guanine deaminase (guanase); imidazo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione ring system; azepinomycin analogue


Guanine deaminase (EC 3.5.4.3, Guanase, or GDA), is an enzyme that hydrolyzes guanine to form xanthine that is unsuitable for DNA/RNA buildup.1 This enzyme has been found in normal or transformed human organs and sera.2 One of the approaches for antiviral/anticancer therapy is to design structural mimics of natural guanine as nucleic acid building blocks, with an anticipation that such analogues would be incorporated into DNA/RNA of virus or cancer cells, interrupting their normal replicative processes.3 Indeed, there are some known guanine mimics, such as 6-thioguanine4, 5 and 8-azaguanine,6 both of which are potent anticancer compounds. However, they both are believed to be substrates for the enzyme guanase, which converts them into their respective inactive forms 6-thioxanthine and 8-azaxanthine, respectively.7 A potent guanase inhibitor would restore the original potency of these anticancer compounds.

A potent guanase inhibitor will also be an excellent tool for studying a number of disease-related metabolic processes in which the enzyme is involved either as an indicative or as a causative factor. There are several documented reports on detection of abnormally high levels of serum guanase activity in patients with liver diseases like hepatitis.810 Therefore, the elevated enzyme activity has been suggested as a marker of hepatitis and hepatoma.10 There are also various reports of patients developing hepatitis C when they are transfused with blood containing high levels of serum guanase activity.8, 10, 11 Even though no direct cause and effect relationship has been established between increased guanase activity and post-transfusional hepatitis (PTH), it is reasonable to assume that the guanase level is responsible, in part, for the development of PTH. There are only a few and scattered reports on the specific physiological or metabolic role of guanase. Nonetheless, there are important observations made on this enzyme as reported in the literature. For example, it is known that high serum guanase activity is a clear biochemical indicator of organ rejection in liver transplant patients.12 It has also been shown that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have significantly elevated levels of guanase activity in their cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), and that there is a clear correlation between the extent of disability and the level of guanase activity.13

Another important aspect of guanase activity is its involvement in cancerous tissues. It has long been known that carcinogenic processes and the activities of some enzymes in cancer tissues and cells are strongly interrelated. In this regard, it is important to consider reports of abnormal levels of guanase activity in various cancer tissues. An increase in guanase activity has been reported in lung,14 gastric,15 kidney,1618 and breast cancer tissues.19 It is suggested that this difference in activity is a physiological attempt of the cancer cell to regulate the guanine and/or xanthine level, which is needed by cancer cells to accelerate their salvage metabolic pathway activity. Since the de novo pathway is mostly employed by normal cells for replication, a guanase inhibitor can preferentially check the growth of cancer cells without affecting the normal cells. Furthermore, guanase plays an important role in the detoxification process of high amounts of toxic guanine produced from accelerated metabolism in the cancerous tissues. In any event, a guanase inhibitor can trigger cell death either due to cytotoxicity of the accumulating metabolites as proposed in the case of adenosine deaminase (ADA)2023 or through depletion of the nucleotide pool necessary for cell growth.

While many studies of guanase inhibition have been reported both from this lab2430 and others,3135 guanase is still one of the least studied enzymes of the nucleic acid metabolism, although it has been isolated from rabbit liver,1 human liver,36 and rat brain37 years ago. Azepinomycin38, 39 is a naturally occurring inhibitor of guanase, which has so far been studied only in tissue culture systems. So, while its IC50 value (the concentration of the drug required to inhibit 50% of the guanase activity) is known to be ~10−5 M,38 the Ki of azepinomycin against guanase has never been determined biochemically against the isolated pure enzyme. In our continued efforts to discover a potent guanase inhibitor, we report here the synthesis and biochemical studies of an analogue azepinomycin that more closely resembles the putative transition state of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction.

graphic file with name nihms256626f4.jpg

The recently solved crystal structure of guanase40 from Bacillus subtilis suggests that the enzyme-catalyzed reaction (Figure 1) is assisted by an active site zinc metal ion (Zn+2), which forms a tetrahedral complex with His-53, Cys-83, and Cys-86 of the protein, along with an isolated water molecule. Glutamate-55 serves as a proton shuttle, abstracting a proton from the zinc-activated water to form the necessary hydroxide nucleophile, while also enabling protonation at the N-3 site of guanine, thus resulting in the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate 2, as shown. Glu-55 also assists in protonation of the NH2 group of 2, facilitating the elimination of a molecule of ammonia to form the final product xanthine.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Zn+2-Assisted Hydrolysis of Guanine to Xanthine, Catalyzed by Guanase

Azepinomycin may interrupt the above hydrolytic process via coordination of its own OH group at position −6 with the active site zinc, displacing the crucial active site water molecule involved in hydrolysis. The observed weak inhibitory characteristics of azepinomycin may involve multiple factors, including, but not limited to, the fact that it does not represent the true transition state analogue lacking the geminal hydroxy-amino groups attached to its 6-position so as to effectively mimic the tetrahedral intermediate (2) of the guanase-mediated conversion of guanine (1) to xanthine (3).

With the above rationale, we report here the design, synthesis, and biochemical evaluation of our current target molecule, namely, 3-benzyl-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6-hydroxymethyl-6-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]imidazo [4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione (10). Compound 10 meets the criteria outlined above. It has the required geminal carbon at position-6 as described except that the OH group had to be removed one atom further from the geminal junction in order to avoid any potential elimination of water with anchimeric assistance from one of the two NH groups attached to the junction. For the same reason, the exonuclear NH2 had to be protected by a benzyloxycarbonyl (CBZ) group. A benzyl group has been introduced at position-3 in order to create a hydrophobic environment in its vicinity, which has been suggested to enhance the enzyme-ligand interactions, based on our earlier studies on this enzyme.26, 28 Attachment of a benzyl group has further scope for introduction of a variety of substituents on the phenyl ring with defined dimensions, and thus can act as both hydrophobic and dimensional probes. Finally, the introduction of a carbonyl group at position-5 of the heterocycle, coupled with movement of the 6-hydroxy group away from the ring by an additional carbon atom, would allow excellent coordination of the inhibitor with Zn+2 to form a stable, 6-membered ring structure. The latter would use two of the four metal coordination sites, while the other two would be occupied by two of the three original amino acid residues at the enzyme active site. This arrangement would would further strengthen the interaction of azepinomycin with the active site Zn+2 ion.

graphic file with name nihms256626f5.jpg

The target 10 was synthesized in five steps commencing from compound 5, which has been reported from this laboratory several years ago.41 The sequential in situ bromination of the malonate carbon of 5, elimination of HBr, followed by conjugate addition of ammonia, gave 6 in 74% yield. The free NH2 of 6 was protected as a benzyloxycarbonyl (CBZ) derivative by treatment with CBZ-Cl in the presence of Hünig’s base to produce 7 in 84% yield. The nitro group of 7 was reduced with zinc and acetic acid to obtain 8 in 87% yield. Compound 8 was ring-closed using potassium t-butoxide in dimethylformamide to yield 9 in 46% yield. Finally, the ester group of 9 was selectively reduced to a primary alcohol using LiH-9BBN42 to obtain the target 10 in 39% yield. All new compounds were completely characterized by 1H- and 13C-NMR and mass spectral data, coupled with either elemental microanalyses or high resolution mass spectral (HRMS) data.43

Guanase inhibition studies with target 10 were conducted using guanase from rabbit liver (MP Biochemicals) at 25 °C and pH 7.4 by spectroscopically measuring the rate of hydrolysis of the substrate guanine at λmax 245 nm. The change in optical density at λmax 245 nm per unit time is a measure of the guanase activity. A total of seven different concentrations of the substrate, ranging from 5 to 40 µM, was employed for each inhibitor concentration that was either 20 or 40 µM, while the amount of enzyme in each assay was 7.7 × 10−3 unit. The Lineweaver-Burk plots (1/V versus 1/S) (see Figure 2) were used to calculate KM, Vmax, and Ki. Our biochemical results showed that Km of enzyme with guanine as substrate was 9.5 × 10−6 M. The target compound 10 showed competitive inhibition with a Ki of 16.70 ± 0.48 × 10−6 M.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Lineweaver-Burk plot of target compound 10

In conclusion, we have designed, synthesized, and biochemically evaluated a novel, putative transition state analogue inhibitor of guanase. While the observed Ki in micromolar range is respectable, additional structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies would be necessary to further enhance the inhibitory potential. Such studies could involve introduction of various alkyl, aryl, or aralkyl substituents at N-4, N-6, and/or N-7 of 10 or attachment of atoms or groups with + or − inductive effects at various positions of the two exonuclear phenyl rings.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of the Target Compound 10

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (#1R01 GM087738-01A1) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and Notes

  • 1.Lewis AS, Glantz MD. J. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:3862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knights EM, Jr, Whitehouse JL, Hue AC, Santos CL. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1965;65:355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grassi G, Grassi M, editors. Nucleic Acid Based Drug as Novel Therapeutics in the Treatment of Human Disease. 2004. p. 87. [In: Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol.; 2004, 5(4)] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palle J, Frost B-M, Petersson C, Hasle H, Hellebostad M, Kanerva J, Schmiegelow K, Lonnerholm G. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2010;21:129. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32831bc086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yuan B, Wang Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:23665. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804047200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ye B-x, Wang C-h, Jing A-h. J. Chinese Chem. Soc. (Taipei, Taiwan) 2003;50:457. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yao L, Cukier RI, Yan H. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2007;111:4200. doi: 10.1021/jp0673056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ito S, Tsuji Y, Kitagawa N, Akihiko I, Syundo J, Tamura Y, Kishi S, Mori H. Hepatol. 1988;8:383. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840080233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishikawa Y, Fukumoto K, Watanabe F, Yoshihara H. Rinsho. Byori. 1989;37:1392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shiota G, Fukada J, Ito T, Tsukizawa M, Yamada M, Sato M. Jpn. J. Med. 1989;28:22. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine1962.28.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mihara M, Katayama Y, Ito K, Nakajima N. J. Jpn. Soc. Blood. Trans. 1984;30:334. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crary GS, Yasmineh WG, Snover DC, Vine W. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:2315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanshige Y, Matsumoto H, Chiba S, Hashimoto S, Noro H. Clin. Neurol. (Rinsho Shinkeigaku) 1989;29:854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Greengard O, Head JF, Goldberg SL. Cancer Res. 1980;40:2295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Durak I, Cetin R, Canbolat O, Cetin D, Yurtarslani Z, Unal A. Cancer Lett. 1994;84:199. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(94)90376-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Durak L, Beduk Y, Kavutcu M, Szer O, Yaman O, Ozturk HS, Canbolat O, Ulutepe S. Cancer Invest. 1997;15:212. doi: 10.3109/07357909709039717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paletzki RF. Neurosci. 2002;109:15. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00352-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuan G, Bin JC, McKay DJ, Snyder FF. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:8175. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Canbolat O, Durak I, Cetin R, Kavutcu M, Demirci S, Ozturk S. Breast Cancer. Res. Treat. 1996;37:189. doi: 10.1007/BF01806500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alexander SD, Spiers TD, Moore D, Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Cummings FJ, Nieman RS, Bennet JM, O'Connel MD. New Engl. J. Med. 1987;316:825. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198704023161401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tung R, Silber R, Quagliata F, Conklyn M, Gottesman J, Hirscholrn R. J. Clin. Invest. 1976;57:756. doi: 10.1172/JCI108334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dearden C, Matutes E, Catovsky D. Br. J. Cancer. 1991;64:903. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klohs WD, Kraker AJ. Pharmacol. Rev. 1992;44:459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bhan A, Hosmane RS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6831. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bhan A, Hosmane RS. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 1995;14:455. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rajappan V, Hosmane RS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998;8:3649. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00672-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rajappan VP, Hosmane RS. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 1998;17:1141. doi: 10.1080/07328319808004227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rajappan VP, Hosmane RS. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 1999;18:835. doi: 10.1080/15257779908041573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Hosmane RS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001;11:2893. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00591-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ujjinamatada RK, Bhan A, Hosmane RS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;16:5551. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baker BR. Irreversible enzyme inhibitors . LXXIII. J. Med. Chem. 1967;10:59–61. doi: 10.1021/jm00313a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar S, Josan V, Sanger KCS, Tewari KK, Krishnan PS. Biochem. J. 1967;102:691–704. doi: 10.1042/bj1020691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lucacchini A, Montali U, Segnini D. Ital. J. Biochem. 1977;26:27–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saxena AK, Ahmad S, Shanker K, Bhargava KP, Kishor K. Pharmazie. 1980;35:16. doi: 10.1002/chin.198022194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saxena AK, Ahmad S, Shanker K, Kishor K. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 1984;16:243. doi: 10.1016/s0031-6989(84)80107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gupta NK, Glantz MD. Arch Biochem. Biophys. 1985;236:266. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(85)90626-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mansoor M, Kalyankar GD, Talwar GP. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1963;77:307. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)90501-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Isshiki K, Takahashi Y, Linuma H, Naganawa H, Umezawa Y, Takeuchi T, Umezawa H, Nishimura S, Okada N, Tatsuta K. J. Antibiot. 1987;40:1461. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fuji T, Saito T, Fujizawa T. Purines. LXIII. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994;42:1231. doi: 10.1248/cpb.42.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liaw S-H, Chang Y-J, Lai C-T, Chang H-C, Chang G-G. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:35479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405304200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bhan A, Hosmane RS. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1993;30:1453. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brown HC, Singaram B, Mathew CP. J. Org. Chem. 1981;13:2712. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Experimental:. Organic Synthesis Procedure: Preparation and physico-chemical properties of the compounds are as follows: Diethyl 2-Amino-2-[N-(1-benzyl-5-nitroimidazolyl-4-carbonyl)amino]malonate (6): In a flame-dried two-neck round bottomed flask, NaH (0.68g, 17.2 mmol) was added under nitrogen environment. Dry THF (20 mL) was then added and the flask was then cooled and maintained at −78°C (with dry ice acetone mixture). The starting material 5 (3.5 g, 8.6 mmol) was added quickly in one portion and was allowed to stir for 10 mins before bromine (liquid) (0.95 mL, 17.2 mmol) was added. After 10 mins liq ammonia (2 mL) (excess) was added. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for one hour and then allowed to come to room temperature. After rotary evaporating the solvent it is neutralized in cold, filtered and extracted in dichloromethane. Further purification was done using column chromatography using 1% –3 % methanol in chloroform. Hexane wash gives yellow product. Yield 74 % (2.7 g, 6.6 mmol). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.13 (t, 6H, CH3), 4.17 (m, 4H, CH2), 5.06 (s, 2H, Bn), 6.0 (s, 2H, exchangeable with D2O, NH2), 7.2–7.32 (m, 6H, Ar + Imd CH), 7.9 (s, 1H, exchangeable with D2O, CONH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 14.3, 46.2, 62.7, 83.9, 111.0, 127.8, 128.1, 129.1, 131.4, 137.1, 144.7, 163.2, 165.9; Anal: Calcd C, 51.55; H, 5.05; N, 16.70. Found C, 51.44; H, 5.09; N, 16.57. Diethyl 2-(Benzyloxycarbonyl)amino-2-[N-(1-benzyl-5-nitroimidazolyl-4-carbonyl)amino]-malonate (7): Compound 6 (2.3 g, 5.48 mmol) was taken in a dry flask and dissolved in dry THF under nitrogen. To the stirred solution, benzylchloroformate (0.8 mL, 5.6 mmol) and Hunig’s base (2.8 mL, 16.4 mmol) were added in iced condition. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir in iced condition to room temperature overnight. After the reaction was complete, the solvent was evaporated and the residue was neutralized in cold and extracted in dichloromethane. It was further purified using column chromatography with 1% methanol in chloroform. Yield 83% (2.5g, 4.5 mmol). Rf 0.34 (chloroform : methanol 5: 0.1); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.12 (t, 6H, CH3), 4.17 (m, 4H, CH2), 5.05 (s, 2H, Bn), 5.5 (s, 2H, OBn), 7.21–7.39 (m, 10H, Ar), 8.2 (s, 1H, Imd CH), 8.4 (s, 1H, carbamate NH, D2O exchangeable), 9.4 (s, 1H, amide NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 14.1, 50.7, 63.5, 66.5, 70.7, 127.6, 128.1, 128.4, 128.6, 128.8, 129.3, 134.5, 135.9, 136.3, 136.9, 140.5, 155.1, 160.0, 164.6; HRMS (FAB), calcd. for C26H28N5O9: 554.18821 (MH+); obsd. m/z 554.18870. Diethyl 2-(Benzyloxycarbonyl)amino-2-[N-(5-amino-1-benzylimidazolyl-4-carbonyl)amino] malonate (8): Dried 7 (2.2g, 3.9 mmol) was dissolved in dry ethanol. Zinc dust (5.09g, 78 mmol) followed by acetic acid (23 mL) were added to the reaction mixture and was refluxed for an hour, when the white (zinc salts) precipitate appeared. It was then filtered through Celite followed by washing with ethanol. Evaporation of ethanol gave 8, which was further purified by column chromatography (Care should be taken to remove the acetic acid completely otherwise it can make the ring closure step problematic). Yield 87%, (1.8 g, 3.4 mmol); Rf 0.17 (chloroform : methanol 5: 0.1); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.11 (t, 6H, CH3), 4.18 (m, 4H, CH2), 5.03 (s, 2H, OBn), 5.09 (s, 2H, Bn), 5.9 (s, 2H, NH2 exchangeable with D2O), 7.2–7.37 (m, 11H, Ar+ Imd CH), 8.07 (s, 1H, carbamate NH, exchangeable with D2O), δ 8.1 (s, 1H, amide NH, exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 14.2, 46.2, 63.3, 66.5, 69.9, 111.1, 127.8, 128.1, 128.2, 128.4, 128.2, 129.2, 131.4, 136.8, 137.2, 144.4, 154.8, 163.2, 165.4; HRMS (FAB), calcd. for C26H29N5O7: 523.20691 (M+); obsd. m/z 524.21452 (MH+). 3-benzyl-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6-(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino-6-ethoxycarbonylimidazo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione (9): Potassium tert-butoxide (24 mg, 0.21 mmol) was taken in a dry flask with nitrogen line and 5 mL of dry DMF was added and stirred vigorously. To the mixture was added 8 (70mg, 0.13 mmol). The heterogeneous mixture immediately turns orange. The mixture was vigorously stirred for 2 hours and was monitored by TLC. Care should be taken as one of the by-products is very close to the starting material in TLC using ethyl acetate as the solvent system. The resulting yellow liquid was concentrated under vacuum and neutralized and extracted with ethyl acetate. It is then purified by column chromatography using chloroform: methanol (10:1) as the solvent system. Triturating with ether gave 9 as a yellow product (30 mg, 0.06 mmol), yield 46%; Rf 0.46 (ethylacetate : methanol, 2:1); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.09 (t, 3H, CH3), 4.09 (q, 2H, CH2), 5.05 (m, 2H, OBn), 5.2 (s, 2H, Bn), 6.8 (d, 1H, NH), 7.24–7.34 (m, 11H, Ar), 7.7 (d, 1H, NH, exchangeable with D2O), 7.8 (1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 14.2, 47.5, 62.7, 66.7, 99.9, 114.7, 127.7, 128.1, 128.5, 128.7, 128.9, 129.4, 135.9, 136.7, 138.6, 140.7, 150.9, 156.2, 156.9, 167.8; Anal. Calcd for C24H24N5O6.75 : C, 60.37; H, 4.86; N, 14.67. Found: C, 58.38; H, 4.74; N 13.96; HRMS (FAB), calcd. for C24H23N5O6: 477.16469 (M+); obsd. m/z 478.17203 (MH+). 3-benzyl-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6-hydroxymethyl-6-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)-amino]imidazo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione (10): Compound 9 (280 mg, 0.58 mmol) was taken in a dry flask under nitrogen atmosphere. It was dissolved in 10 mL of freshly distilled THF. It was kept in ice-cold condition. To the cooled, well stirred solution was added drop wise through syringe 1M solution of LiH-9BBN in THF (0.75 mL). The mixture was allowed to stir for an hour before quenching with 10 mL ethyl acetate and evaporated to dryness with small portion of silica gel. Column chromatography was done with 2% methanol in chloroform. The proper fractions were collected and evaporated to obtain 10 a was hite solid (0.1g, 0.23 mmol), yield 39%; Rf 0.26 (ethylacetate : methanol, 2:1); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 3.76 (m, 1H+ 1H, CH2), 5.02 (m, 2H +1H, OBn + OH, OH exchangable with D2O), 5.2 (s, 2H, Bn), 6.5 (m, NH, 1H), 7.28–7.36 (m, 10H, Ar+), 8.28 (1H, Imidazole), 12.3 (s, NH, 1H, exchangable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 47.2, 60.7, 66.2, 79.7, 115.4, 127.8, 128.3, 128.4, 128.8, 129.3, 136.9, 137.2, 137.5, 140, 151.4, 155.6; HRMS (FAB), calcd. for C22H20O5N5: 434.14413 (M+); obsd. m/z 435.15205 (MH+). Biochemical Inhibition Procedure: Guanine deaminase from rabbit liver was purchased from MP biochemicals as a suspension in 3.2 M (NH4)2SO4, pH 6, activity = 10 mg/mL, 0.06 µmol/mL. Freshly prepared solutions of Guanine and tris-HCl buffer (0.05M) were used for the of biochemical studies. Enzyme solution could be kept at room temperature for a day’s run. 25 mg of Guanine was dissolved in 1mL NaOH (1N) and volume made to 100 mL in volumetric flask with Tris-HCl buffer (0.05 M). The solution was kept at room temperature overnight. Next day, the solution was filtered and concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometer using the molar extinction coefficient 10700 at λ 243 nm. 60 µL of enzyme solution was used in each 1mL cuvette and was quickly shaken before taking the reading against air. Tris-HCl buffer was used as a reference for all measurements.

RESOURCES