Abstract
Sanguibacter keddieii is the type species of the genus Sanguibacter, the only genus within the family of Sanguibacteraceae. Phylogenetically, this family is located in the neighborhood of the genus Oerskovia and the family Cellulomonadaceae within the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. The strain described in this report was isolated from blood of apparently healthy cows. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Sanguibacteraceae, and the 4,253,413 bp long single replicon genome with its 3735 protein-coding and 70 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.
Keywords: blood isolate, aerobic, facultative anaerobic, Sanguibacteraceae, Micrococcineae
Introduction
Strain ST-74T (= DSM 10542 = ATCC 51767 = JCM 11429 = NCIMB 703025) is the type strain of Sanguibacter keddieii, which is the type species of the genus Sanguibacter [1]. S. keddieii strain ST-74T was isolated in 1995 by Fernandez-Garayzabal et al. from the blood of apparently healthy dairy cows in Spain [1] as the first member of the genus Sanguibacter and the family of Sanguibacteraceae [2]. On the basis of 16S rRNA sequence phylogeny, the small (six species, one genus) family Sanguibacteraceae is located in the neighborhood to the genus Oerskovia [3], now part of the Cellulomonadaceae [2], as well as the Promicromonosporaceae. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. keddieii ST-74T together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.
Classification and features
Like strain ST-74T, two more type strains from the genus Sanguibacter (S. suarezii ST-26T [1], and S. inulinus [4]) have been isolated from blood of cows. The type strains of the other Sanguibacter species have been isolated from coastal sediment in the Eastern China Sea [5], from surface soil of a ginseng field in South Korea [6], from alpine subnival plants (DQ339590), and from a sea sand sample collected on the Weaver Peninsula on King George Island, Antarctica [7], which may suggest a global ecological versatility of this genus. Only two related but yet uncultivated phylotypes with more than 98.5% 16S rRNA sequence identity were reported from the gastrointestinal tract of pigs (AF371710), and from glacial meltwater at 6,350 m on Mount Everest (EU584523), and no significant matches with any 16S rRNA sequences from environmental genomic samples and surveys are reported at the NCBI BLAST server (March 2009).
Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of S. keddieii strain ST-74T in a 16S rRNA based tree. Analysis of the four 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome of strain ST-74T indicated that the genes differ by up to two nucleotides from each other, with two of the copies being identical with the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 10542 (X79450).
S. keddieii ST-74T cells are facultatively anaerobic, Gram-positive, short, irregular shaped motile rods [1] (Table 1 and Figure 2). The colonies on tryptose soy agar (TSA, Difco) are circular, convex, with entire edges and yellow in color. Strain ST-74T is Voges-Proskauer negative and does not reduce nitrate. Casein and gelatin are hydrolyzed. Cellulose and Tween 80 are not hydrolyzed. Acid is produced from a broad range of substrates: α-methyl-D-mannoside, α-methyl-D-glucoside, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, rhamnose, D-rafinose, glycerol, L-arabinose, ribose, D-xylose, β-methyl-xyloside, galactose, glucose, fructose, D-mannose, rhamnose, arbutin, sorbitol, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, lactose, melibiose, sucrose, trehalose, raffinose, glycogen, β-gentibiose, turanose and lyxose [1]. The optimum growth temperature of strain ST-74T is 25-30°C [1]; it grows at 35°C on agar [7] but not at 42°C [1].
Table 1. Classification and general features of S. keddieii ST-74 T according to the MIGS recommendations [12].
MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence code |
---|---|---|---|
Current classification | Domain Bacteria | TAS [13] | |
Phylum Actinobacteria | TAS [14] | ||
Class Actinobacteria | TAS [2] | ||
Order Actinomycetales | TAS [2] | ||
Family Sanguibacteraceae | TAS [15] | ||
Genus Sanguibacter | TAS [1] | ||
Species Sanguibacter keddieii | TAS [1] | ||
Type strain ST-74 | |||
Gram stain | positive | TAS [1] | |
Cell shape | short, irregular rods | TAS [1] | |
Motility | motile | TAS [1] | |
Sporulation | not reported | ||
Temperature range | mesophilic | TAS [1] | |
Optimum temperature | 25-30°C | TAS [1] | |
Salinity | not reported | ||
MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | primarily aerobe; facultatively anaerobic; no nitrate reduction | TAS [1] |
Carbon source | broad variety of sugars | TAS [1] | |
Energy source | carbohydrates | NAS | |
MIGS-6 | Habitat | animal blood | TAS [1] |
MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free living | NAS |
MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | none | NAS |
Biosafety level | 2 | TAS [16] | |
Isolation | blood of apparently healthy cow | TAS [1] | |
MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Spain | NAS |
MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | before 1995 | TAS [1] |
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2 | Latitude , Longitude | not reported | |
MIGS-4.3 | Depth | not reported | |
MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | not reported |
Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [17]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or another expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.
Little is known about the chemotaxonomy of strain ST-74T. The major cellular fatty acids are saturated straight chain and branched-chain forms. In strain ST-74T, the straight chain fatty acids 16:0 (53.3%), 18:0 (10.1%), 14:0 (5.8%) predominate over lower amounts of branched chain anteiso-15:0 (11.4%) and iso-16:0 (5.4%) fatty acids. This is in contrast to other species in the genus Sanguibacter and in the neighboring Oerskovia and Cellulomonadaceae, where branched chain fatty acids are predominant [18]. Only traces of unsaturated acids, anteiso-15:1 (1.6%), and no mycolic acids were detected [1], as in the neighboring taxa Oerskovia and other members of Cellulomonadaceae. The murein of S. keddieii contains L-Lys-Ser-D-Glu, variation A4α [1], strikingly different from members of the genus Oerskovia and other members of the family Cellulomonadaceae [1]. Menaquinones are the sole respiratory lipoquinones present, with a partially saturated menaquinone containing nine-isoprene subunits MK-9(H4) predominating [1]. The location of the points of unsaturation are in the second and third isoprene units, adjacent to the napthoquinone nucleus (MK-9 (II, III-H4), in O. turbata. The phospholipid composition has not been reported, but phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, together with phosphoglycolipids have been reported in members of the neighboring taxa Oerskovia and other members of the Cellulomonadaceae [18].
Genome sequencing and annotation
Genome project history
This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [11] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Genome sequencing project information.
MIGS ID | Property | Term |
---|---|---|
MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | Finished |
MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Three genomic libraries: two Sanger libraries - 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos – |
and one 454 pyrosequence standard library | ||
MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | ABI3730, 454 GS FLX |
MIGS-31.2 | Sequencing coverage | 10.4× Sanger; 20× pyrosequence |
MIGS-30 | Assemblers | Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap |
MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Genemark 4.6b, tRNAScan-SE-1.23, infernal 0.81 |
INSDC / Genbank ID | 19711 | |
Genbank Date of Release | August 30, 2009 | |
GOLD ID | Gc01087 | |
NCBI Project ID | 19711 | |
Database: IMG-GEBA | 2500901759 | |
MIGS-13 | Source material identifier | DSM 10542 |
Project relevance | Tree of Life, GEBA |
Growth conditions and DNA isolation
S. keddieii ST-74T, DSM10542, was grown in DSMZ medium 92 (3% trypticase soy broth, 0.3% yeast extract) [19] at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol, but with extended (one hour) incubation at 37°C as described in Wu et al. [20
Genome sequencing and assembly
The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be at found the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov). 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Version 1.1.02.15, Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 4,746 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [21] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walking, or PCR amplification. A total of 2,397 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence was less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 30.4× coverage of the genome.
Genome annotation
Genes were identified using GeneMark [22] as part of the genome annotation pipeline in the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) system [23], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline (http://geneprimp.jgi-psf.org) [24]. The predicted coding sequences (CDS)s were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [25] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using the tool RNAmmer [26]. Other non coding RNAs were identified by searching the genome for the Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (v0.81) [27]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [28].
Metabolic network analysis
The metabolic Pathway/Genome Database (PGDB) was generated computationally using Pathway Tools software version 12.5 [29] and MetaCyc version 12.5 [30], based on annotated EC numbers and a customized enzyme name mapping file. This metabolic map has undergone no subsequent manual curation and may contain errors, similar to a Tier 3 BioCyc PGDB [31].
Genome properties
The genome is 4,253,413 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 71.9% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,805 genes predicted, 3,735 were protein coding genes, and 70 RNAs. In addition, 25 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (74.4%) were assigned with a putative function, while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4. A cellular overview diagram is presented in Figure 4, followed by a summary of metabolic network statistics shown in Table 5.
Table 3. Genome Statistics.
Attribute | Value | % of Total |
---|---|---|
Genome size (bp) | 4,253,413 | 100.00% |
DNA Coding region (bp) | 3,872,139 | 91.04% |
DNA G+C content (bp) | 3,057,630 | 71.89% |
Number of replicons | 1 | |
Extrachromosomal elements | 0 | |
Total genes | 3,805 | 100.00% |
RNA genes | 70 | 1.84% |
rRNA operons | 4 | |
Protein-coding genes | 3,735 | 98.16% |
Pseudo genes | 25 | 0.66% |
Genes with function prediction | 2,832 | 74.43% |
Genes in paralog clusters | 501 | 13.17% |
Genes assigned to COGs | 2,706 | 71.12% |
Genes assigned Pfam domains | 2,785 | 73.19% |
Genes with signal peptides | 912 | 23.97% |
Genes with transmembrane helices | 993 | 26.10% |
CRISPR repeats | 0 |
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories.
Code | Value | % age | Description |
---|---|---|---|
J | 166 | 5.0 | Translation |
A | 1 | 0.0 | RNA processing and modification |
K | 317 | 10.0 | Transcription |
L | 120 | 4.0 | Replication, recombination and repair |
B | 1 | 0.0 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
D | 25 | 1.0 | Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis |
Y | 0 | 0.0 | Nuclear structure |
V | 69 | 2.0 | Defense mechanisms |
T | 173 | 6.0 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
M | 134 | 4.0 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
N | 55 | 2.0 | Cell motility |
Z | 3 | 0.0 | Cytoskeleton |
W | 0 | 0.0 | Extracellular structures |
U | 41 | 1.0 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
O | 84 | 3.0 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
C | 174 | 6.0 | Energy production and conversion |
G | 354 | 12.0 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
E | 237 | 8.0 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
F | 77 | 3.0 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
H | 119 | 4.0 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
I | 80 | 3.0 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
P | 199 | 7.0 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
Q | 43 | 1.0 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
R | 362 | 12.0 | General function prediction only |
S | 213 | 7.0 | Function unknown |
- | 1029 | 27.5 | Not in COGs |
Table 5. Metabolic Network Statistics.
Attribute | Value |
---|---|
Total genes | 3,805 |
Enzymes | 714 |
Enzymatic reactions | 935 |
Metabolic pathways | 205 |
Metabolites | 676 |
Acknowledgements
We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Katja Steenblock for growing S. keddieii ST-74T cultures, Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction, and Brian J. Tindall for chemotaxonomic advice (all at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396 as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1.
References
- 1.Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Dominguez L, Pascual C, Jones D, Collins MD. Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of some unknown coryneform bacteria isolated from bovine blood and milk: description of Sanguibacter gen.nov. Lett Appl Microbiol 1995; 20:69-75 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01289.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479-491 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prauser H, Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. Description of Oerskovia gen. nov. to harbor Oerskov's motile Nocardia. Appl Microbiol 1970; 19:534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pascual C, Collins MD, Grimont PAD, Dominguez L, Fernandes-Garayzabal JF. Sanguibacter inulinus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:811-813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang Y, Dai X, He L, Wang YN, Wang BJ, Liu Z, Liu SJ. Sanguibacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from coastal sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1755-1758 10.1099/ijs.0.63471-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim MK, Pulla RK, Kim SY, Yi TH, Soung NK, Yang DC. Sanguibacter soli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:538-541 10.1099/ijs.0.65399-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hong SG, Lee YK, Yim JH, Chun J, Lee HK. Sanguibacter antarcticus sp. nov., isolated from Antarctic sea sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:50-52 10.1099/ijs.0.65031-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368-376 10.1007/BF01734359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771 10.1080/10635150802429642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D475-D479 10.1093/nar/gkm884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes: the “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547 10.1038/nbt1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garrity GM, Holt J. Taxonomic Outline of the Archaea and Bacteria Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Ed. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW Eds. Vol 1 The Archaea, Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria 2001 pp. 155-166 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stackebrandt E, Schumann P. Description of Bogoriellaceae fam. nov., Dermacoccaceae fam. nov., Rarobacteraceae fam. nov. and Sanguibacteraceae fam. nov. and emendation of some families of the suborder Micrococcineae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1279-1285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anonymous Biological Agents. Technical rules for biological agents www.baua.de TRBA 466.
- 17.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia ad related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87-89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php
- 20.Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056-1060 10.1038/nature08656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han CS, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In: Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics & computational biology. Hamid R. Arabnia & Homayoun Valafar (eds), CSREA Press. June 26-29, 2006:141-146. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:2607-2618 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. Expert IMG ER: A system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271-2278 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova, N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. (Submitted) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955-964 10.1093/nar/25.5.955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100-3108 10.1093/nar/gkm160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:D121-D124 10.1093/nar/gki081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, Chen IMA, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, et al. The Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D528-D533 10.1093/nar/gkm846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karp PD, Paley SM, Romero P. The Pathway Tools Software. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:S225-S232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Caspi R, Karp P, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley SM, Rhee SY, Shearer A, et al. The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D623-D631 10.1093/nar/gkm900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, Ahren D, Tsoka S, Darzentas N, Kunin V, Lopez-Bigas N. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:6083-6089 10.1093/nar/gki892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]