Skip to main content
Standards in Genomic Sciences logoLink to Standards in Genomic Sciences
. 2010 Oct 27;3(2):153–162. doi: 10.4056/sigs.1153107

Complete genome sequence of ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’ type strain (YNP1T)

Hajnalka Kiss 1, David Cleland 2, Alla Lapidus 3, Susan Lucas 3, Tijana Glavina Del Rio 3, Matt Nolan 3, Hope Tice 3, Cliff Han 1, Lynne Goodwin 1,3, Sam Pitluck 3, Konstantinos Liolios 3, Natalia Ivanova 3, Konstantinos Mavromatis 3, Galina Ovchinnikova 3, Amrita Pati 3, Amy Chen 4, Krishna Palaniappan 4, Miriam Land 3,5, Loren Hauser 3,5, Yun-Juan Chang 3,5, Cynthia D Jeffries 3,5, Megan Lu 3, Thomas Brettin 3, John C Detter 1, Markus Göker 6, Brian J Tindall 6, Brian Beck 2, Timothy R McDermott 7, Tanja Woyke 3, James Bristow 3, Jonathan A Eisen 3,8, Victor Markowitz 4, Philip Hugenholtz 3, Nikos C Kyrpides 3, Hans-Peter Klenk 6,*, Jan-Fang Cheng 3
PMCID: PMC3035366  PMID: 21304745

Abstract

‘Thermobaculum terrenum’ Botero et al. 2004 is the sole species within the proposed genus ‘Thermobaculum’. Strain YNP1T is the only cultivated member of an acid tolerant, extremely thermophilic species belonging to a phylogenetically isolated environmental clone group within the phylum Chloroflexi. At present, the name ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’ is not yet validly published as it contravenes Rule 30 (3a) of the Bacteriological Code. The bacterium was isolated from a slightly acidic extreme thermal soil in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming (USA). Depending on its final taxonomic allocation, this is likely to be the third completed genome sequence of a member of the class Thermomicrobia and the seventh type strain genome from the phylum Chloroflexi. The 3,101,581 bp long genome with its 2,872 protein-coding and 58 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords: extreme thermal soil, thermoacidophile, Gram-positive, nonmotile, non-spore-forming, obligate aerobe, Incertae sedis, Chloroflexi, GEBA

Introduction

Strain YNP1T (= ATCC BAA-798 = CCMEE 7001) is the proposed type strain of the not yet validly published species ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’, which represents the type species of the not yet validly published genus name ‘Thermobaculum’ [1]. The strain was cultivated from a moderately acidic (pH 3.9) extreme thermal soil in Yellowstone National Park (YNP), Wyoming (USA) for which a thorough chemotaxonomic characterization was published by Botero et al. in 2004 [1]. Although the biological characteristics of the novel strain fulfill all criteria required for the type strain of a novel genus, the proposed name ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’ (= hot small rod belonging to earth/soil) has not yet been validly published (= included in one of the updates of the Validation List that is regularly published in Int J Syst Evol Bacteriol), because rule 30 (3a) of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), which requires that as of 1st January 2001 the description of a new species [...] must include the designation of a type strain, and a viable culture of that strain must be deposited in at least two publicly accessible service collections in different countries from which subcultures must be available [2]. Strain YNP1T is currently deposited only in two US culture collections. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Based on analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences, strain YNPT is the sole cultured representative of the genus ‘Thermobaculum’. It has no close relatives among the validly described species within the Chloroflexi. The type strain of Sphaerobacter thermophilus [3] shares the highest pairwise similarity (84.9%), followed by Thermoleophilum album and T. minutum [4-6], the two sole members of the actinobacterial order Thermoleophilales [7] with 83.6% sequence identity, and three type strains from the clostridial genus Thermaerobacter (83.2-83.5%) [8], that are currently not placed within a named family. Only four uncultured bacterial clones in GenBank share a higher degree of sequence similarity with strain YNPT than the type strain of the ‘closest’ related species, S. thermophilus. These are clone DRV-SSB031 from rock varnish in the Whipple Mountains, California (92.1%) [9], and clones AY6_14 (FJ891044), AY6_27 (FJ891057) and AY6_18 (FJ891048) from quartz substrates in the hyperarid core of the Atacama Desert (86.9-87.9%). No phylotypes from environmental screening or metagenomic surveys could be linked to ‘T. terrenum’, indicating a rather rare occurrence in the habitats screened thus far (as of September 2010). A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of ‘T. terrenum’ YNPT was compared using BLAST with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [10] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords, weighted by BLAST scores, were determined. The three most frequent genera were Thermobaculum (81.2%), Sphaerobacter (10.3%) and Conexibacter (8.4%). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'microbial' (3.6%), 'waste' (3.3%), 'soil' (3.3%), 'simulated' (3.2%) and 'level' (3.1%). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'soil' (4.5%), 'structure' (3.3%), 'simulated' (3.2%), 'level/site/waste' (2.9%) and 'core' (2.1%).

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNPT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 1,333 nt long partial sequence generated from ATCC BAA-798 (AF391972).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNPT relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum Chloroflexi . The trees were inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [13] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above the branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] and GenBank records [CP000804,CP000875,CP000909,CP001337] in bold, e.g. the GEBA genome S. thermophilus [17].

The cells of strain YNP1T are 1-1.5 × 2-3 μm long, non-motile rods (Figure 2 and Table 1), enveloped by a thick cell wall external to a cytoplasmic membrane [1]. YNP1T cells occur singly or in pairs, stain Gram-positive in the exponential growth-phase, are obligately aerobic, and non-spore-forming [1]. Colonies are pink-colored and growth occurs best at pH 6-8 (pHopt 7) and 67°C, with a possible temperature range of 41-75°C [1]. Culture doubling time at Topt was 4 hours and increases sharply above 70°C, whereas growth at the temperature extremes was relatively poor [1]. Cells grow best in complex media containing 0.5% NaCl and yeast extract (for growth factors) [1], but also on sucrose, fructose, glucose, ribose, xylose, sorbitol, and xylitol [1]. Strain YNP1T was positive for catalase, urease, and nitrate reduction, but tested negative for oxidases, and was also negative for fermentation of glucose or lactose [1]. No anaerobic growth was observed in the presence of sulfate, nitrate, ferric iron, or arsenate as possible electron acceptors [1]. No chemolithoautotrophic growth was observed in an experimental matrix that included the electron donors H2, H2S, or S0 with oxygen as the electron acceptor. Surprisingly, the in vitro pH optimum of strain YNP1T (pH 7) is much higher than that of the soil from which it was isolated (pH 4-5) [1]. In pure culture, strain YNP1T failed to grow at such low pH values, suggesting that the thermal soil habitat is not optimal for the strain [1].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Transmission electron micrograph of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T, scale bar 0.1 μm

Table 1. Classification and general features of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T according to the MIGS recommendations [18].

MIGS ID     Property     Term     Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria     TAS [19]
    Phylum Chloroflexi     TAS [20-23]
    Class Incertae sedis     NAS
    Order Incertae sedis     NAS
    Family Incertae sedis     NAS
    Genus ‘Thermobaculum’     TAS [1]
    Species ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’     TAS [1]
    Type strain     YNP1     TAS [1]
    Gram stain     positive     TAS [1]
    Cell shape     short rods (1-1.5 × 2-3 µm)     TAS [1]
    Motility     non-motile     TAS [1]
    Sporulation     none     TAS [1]
    Temperature range     65°C-92°C     TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature     67°C     TAS [1]
    Salinity     0.5% NaCl     TAS [1]
MIGS-22     Oxygen requirement     obligate aerobic     TAS [1]
    Carbon source     glucose, fructose, ribose, sorbitol, sucrose,
    xylose, xylitol
    TAS [1]
    Energy source     heterotrophic     TAS [1]
MIGS-6     Habitat     thermal soil     TAS [1]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship     free living     NAS
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity     none     NAS
    Biosafety level     1     TAS [24]
    Isolation     65°C hot extreme thermal soil in small depression site     TAS [1]
MIGS-4     Geographic location     Near Rabbit Creek and Firehole River
    in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA
    TAS [1]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time     June 1998     NAS
MIGS-4.1     Latitude     44.394     NAS
MIGS-4.2     Longitude     -110.568     NAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth     0 m, soil surface     TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4     Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Chemotaxonomy

Murein is present in large amounts, which is consistent with the observed thick (approximately 34 nm) cell walls with a muramic acid content similar to that of Bacillus subtilis [1]. The muramic acid content of strain YNP1T was roughly one quarter of that measured for B. subtilis) but almost 40-fold greater than in E. coli [1]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was not detected [1]. Major fatty acids were dominated by straight and branched chain saturated acids: C18:0 (27.0%); iso-C17:0 (11.6%); iso-C19:0 (12.9%); anteiso-C18:0 (12.5%); C20:0 (16.5%) and C19:0 (6.6%). The pink pigment associated with strain YNP1T exhibited a significant absorption at wavelengths 267, 326, 399, 483, 511, and 549 nm [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [26], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [27]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Genome sequencing project information.

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     Two genomic libraries:
    one Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 library,
    one 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     ABI3730, Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     9.5 × Sanger; 31.8 x pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID     CP001825 (chromosome 1)
    CP001826 (chromosome 2)
    Genbank Date of Release     November 23 and 25, 2009
    GOLD ID     Gc01150
    NCBI project ID     29523
    Database: IMG-GEBA     2501533217
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     ATCC BAA-798
    Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. terrenum strain YNP1T, ATCC BAA-798, was grown in ATCC medium 1981 (M-R2A medium) [28] at 60°C. The culture used to prepare genomic DNA (gDNA) for sequencing was only two transfers from the original deposit. The purity of the culture was determined by growth on general maintenance media under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Cells where harvested after 24 hours by centrifugation and gDNA was extracted from lysozyme-treated cells using CTAB and phenol-chloroform. The purity, quality and size of the bulk gDNA preparation was assessed according to DOE-JGI guidelines. Amplification and partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene confirmed the isolate as ‘T. terrenum’. The quantity of the DNA was determined on a 1% agarose gel using mass markers of known concentration supplied by JGI. The average fragment size of the purified gDNA determined to be ~43kb by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 3,926 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible misassemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [29]. A total of 432 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher [30]). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 10.0× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 32,920 Sanger reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome consists of two chromosomes: the low G+C (48%) 2,026,947 bp long chromosome 1, and the high G+C (64%) 1,074,634 bp long chromosome 2 (Table 3, Figure 3, Figure 4). Of the 2,930 genes predicted (1,935 on chromosome 1 and 995 on chromosome 2), 2,872 were protein-coding genes, and 58 RNAs; forty one pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (73.4%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3. Genome Statistics.

Attribute    Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)    3,101,581   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    2,825,726   91.11%
DNA G+C content (bp)    1,659,573   53.51%
Number of replicons    2
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    2,930   100.00%
RNA genes    58   1.98%
rRNA operons    2
Protein-coding genes    2,872   98.02%
Pseudo genes    41   1.40%
Genes with function prediction    2,151   73.41%
Genes in paralog clusters    439   14.98%
Genes assigned to COGs    2,223   75.78%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,308   78.77%
Genes with signal peptides    573   19.56%
Genes with transmembrane helices    777   26.52%
CRISPR repeats    6

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the 2Mb low G+C chromosome 1. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Graphical circular map of the 1 Mb high-G+C chromosome 2. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4. Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories.

Code    Value   %age    Description
J    139   5.6    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0   0.0    RNA processing and modification
K    158   6.4    Transcription
L    110   4.5    Replication, recombination and repair
B    1   0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    18   0.7    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V    56   2.3    Defense mechanisms
T    106   4.3    Signal transduction mechanisms
M    131   5.3    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    2   0.1    Cell motility
Z    0   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W    0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U    35   1.4    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O    105   4.3    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    160   6.5    Energy production and conversion
G    325   13.2    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    206   8.4    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    60   2.4    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    128   5.2    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    67   2.7    Lipid transport and metabolism
P    134   5.4    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    44   1.8    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    316   12.8    General function prediction only
S    162   6.6    Function unknown
-    707   24.1    Not in COGs

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

References

  • 1.Botero LM, Brown KB, Brumefield S, Burr M, Castenholz RW, Young M, McDermott TR. Thermobaculum terrenum gen. nov., sp. nov.: a non-phototrophic gram-positive thermophile representing an environmental clone group related to the Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) and Thermomicrobia. Arch Microbiol 2004; 181:269-277 10.1007/s00203-004-0647-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR, Clark WA. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990) Revision. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Demharter W, Hensel R, Smida J, Stackebrandt E. Sphaerobacter thermophilus gen. nov., sp. nov. A deeply rooting member of the actinomycetes sub-division isolated from thermophilically treated sewage sludge. Syst Appl Microbiol 1989; 11:261-266 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zarilla KA, Perry JJ. Thermoleophilum album gen. nov. and sp. now., a bacterium obligately for thermophily and n-alkane substrates. Arch Microbiol 1984; 137:286-290 10.1007/BF00410723 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zarilla KA, Perry JJ. Deoxyribonucleic acid homology and other comparisons among obligately thermophilic hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria, with a proposal for Thermoleophilum minutum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:13-16 10.1099/00207713-36-1-13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.List editor. Validation list No. 20. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1986; 36:354-356 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reddy GSN, Garcia-Pichel F. Description of Patulibacter americanus sp. nov., isolated from biological soil crusts, emended description of the genus Patulibacter Takahashi et al. 2006 and proposal of Solirubrobacterales ord. nov. and Thermoleophilales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:87-94 10.1099/ijs.0.64185-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259-2261 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuhlman KR, Fusco WG, La Duc MT, Allenbach LB, Ball CL, Kuhlman GM, Anderson RC, Erickson IK, Stuecker T, Benardini J, et al. Diversity of microorganisms within rock varnish in the Whipple Mountains, California. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:1708-1715 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1708-1715.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:5069-5072 10.1128/AEM.03006-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771 10.1080/10635150802429642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184-200 10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346-D354 10.1093/nar/gkp848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu D, Raymond J, Wu M, Chatterji S, Ren Q, Graham JE, Bryant DA, Robb F, Colman A, Tallon LJ, et al. Complete genome sequence of the aerobic CO-oxidizing thermophile Thermomicrobium roseum. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:e4207 10.1371/journal.pone.0004207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pati A, LaButti K, Pukall R, Nolan M, Glavina del Rio T, Tice H, Cheng JF, Lucas S, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Sphaerobacter thermophilus type strain (S 6022T). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:49-56 10.4056/sigs.601105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547 10.1038/nbt1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Garrity GM, Holt JG. Phylum BVI. Chloroflexi phy. nov. In: DR Boone, RW Castenholz, GM Garrity (eds): Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 1 (The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001, p. 427-446. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.List Editor Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:685-690 10.1099/ijs.0.02358-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hugenholtz P, Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Sphaerobacter thermophilus from the subclass Sphaerobacteridae in the phylum Actinobacteria to the class Thermomicrobia (emended description) in the phylum Chloroflexi (emended description). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:2049-2051 10.1099/ijs.0.03028-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/LGCAdvancedCatalogueSearch/ProductDescription/ tabid/1068/Default.aspx?ATCCNum=BAA-798&Template=bacteria
  • 25.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175-182 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056-1060 10.1038/nature08656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/Attachments/3145.pdf
  • 29.Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:12-20 10.4056/sigs.761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455-457 10.1038/nmeth.1457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271-2278 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Standards in Genomic Sciences are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES