Skip to main content
Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS logoLink to Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS
. 2011 Jan;50(1):73–78.

Ventricular Arrhythmias and Mortality Associated with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane in a Porcine Model of Myocardial Infarction

Marta Regueiro-Purriños 1,*, Felipe Fernández-Vázquez 1, Armando Perez de Prado 1, Jose R Altónaga 1, Carlos Cuellas-Ramón 1, Jose M Ajenjo-Silverio 1, Asuncion Orden 1, Jose M Gonzalo-Orden 1
PMCID: PMC3035407  PMID: 21333167

Abstract

Ischemia of the myocardium can lead to reversible or irreversible injury depending on the severity and duration of the preceding ischemia. Here we compared sevoflurane and isoflurane with particular reference to their hemodynamic effects and ability to modify the effects of acute severe myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Female Large White pigs were premedicated with ketamine, midazolam, and atropine. Propofol was given intravenously for the anesthetic induction, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or sevoflurane. Endovascular, fluoroscopy-guided, coronary procedures were performed to occlude the midleft anterior descending artery by using a coronary angioplasty balloon. After 75 min, the balloon catheter system was withdrawn and the presence of adequate reperfusion flow was verified. The pigs were followed for 2 mo, and overall mortality rate was calculated. The isoflurane group showed lower arterial pressure throughout the procedure, with the difference reaching statistical significance after induction of myocardial ischemia. The ventricular fibrillation rate was higher in isoflurane group (81.3%) than the sevoflurane group (51.7%; relative risk, 1.57 [1.03 to 2.4]). Overall survival was lower in the isoflurane group (75%) than the sevoflurane group (96.4%). In conclusion, in this porcine model of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, sevoflurane was associated with higher hemodynamic stability and fewer ventricular arrhythmias and mortality than was isoflurane.


Ischemia and the subsequent reperfusion of the myocardium can lead to reversible or irreversible injury, depending on the severity and duration on the preceding ischemia. This damage has different clinical manifestations, including the development of ventricular arrhythmias with high incidence of ventricular fibrillation.34,42,51

Many factors can influence the incidence and severity of the arrhythmias associated with myocardial ischemia, from isolated premature ventricular beats to ventricular fibrillation: location and distribution of the occluded coronary artery, extension of myocardial infarction, duration of the coronary occlusion, anesthetic protocol, and heart rate.4,13

The porcine model of myocardial infarction has been used in experimental cardiology for many decades because of its proved reproducibility and similarity with key human anatomic characteristics and pathophysiologic events known to occur in patients with myocardial infarction.1,16,52,55,60,67 One of the undisputed complications of this model is its high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and fibrillation, which complicates anesthetic protocols and postoperative managment.29,32,34,42,58,66

Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury can lead to severe complications; measures to minimize myocardial damage have been an important target of research. Because anesthetics may provide protection against this damage,36,53 improved understanding of the role of anesthetics in the prevention of myocardial injury may provide anesthesiologists with strategies to improve outcome. The use of particular anesthetics for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia is one such approach proposed to protect against the adverse effects of ischemia.18,17

Experimental evidence suggests that volatile anesthetic agents have direct protective properties against ischemic myocardial damage.33,35,41 These cardioprotective effects of inhalant anesthetics can be attributed to several properties exhibited by these agents: preservation of myocardial energy stores (ATP concentrations),45,53 free radical scavenging,19,61,62 and negative inotropic and chronotropic actions.10 Decreases in heart rate, systolic pressure, and, therefore, the rate–pressure product would lower myocardial energy demand and oxygen consumption, thereby reducing myocardial metabolic requirements.53 In addition, halogenated anesthetics reduce the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia, as compared with intravenous agents.18,19,45 Some authors33 have suggested that halogenated anesthetics have an antiarrhythmic effect similar to that of verapamil. The ability of these agents to alter Ca2+ homeostasis in myocardium could explain this effect.28,31,41

In the present study, we compared sevoflurane with isoflurane with special reference to their hemodynamic effects and ability to modify the effects of acute severe myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Therefore, this study had as its main objective the development of a suitable and safe anesthetic protocol in swine as an animal model to study acute myocardial infarction after induction of acute myocardial ischemia. Improving survival rates in animal models not only increases the efficiency of these models but also the ethical acceptability of the procedures. Using the most appropriate anesthetic protocol ensures animal welfare, reduces morbidity, optimizes performance, and increases the quality of research.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

Female Large White pigs (n = 45; weight [mean ± 1 SD], 25 ± 3 kg) were included into this study. Experiments conformed to the Council of the European Communities (86/609/EU)15 and Spanish regulations (RD 223/1988),50 both of which regulate the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Leon. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and the number of animals used. The pigs underwent dietary restriction from solids and liquids for 24 h and 2 h, respectively, to eliminate gastric contents before the intervention.

Anesthesia protocol.

The isoflurane group comprised 16 pigs, and the sevoflurane group had 29 pigs. All animals were premedicated with ketamine (5 mg/kg IM), midazolam (0.35 mg/kg IM), and atropine (0.02 mg/kg IM). Intravenous access was maintained throughout the procedure by using 2 intravenous catheters that were introduced in marginal ear veins, and the pigs received 10 mL/kg/h normal saline throughout the procedure. Propofol (4 mg/kg IV) was given to induce anesthesia, and anesthesia was maintained by using isoflurane or sevoflurane. Once sufficiently sedated, pigs underwent tracheal intubation and subsequently were ventilated with 100% oxygen by using a circle system with a carbon dioxide (CO2) absorber in the circuit and a fresh gas flow of 2 L/min (Julian, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). The initial tidal volume was 10 mL/kg at 12 breaths per minute. The tidal volume was adjusted to maintain the end-expired CO2 concentration between 35 to 45 mm Hg. Body temperature was maintained between 36.5 and 37.5 °C by using an under-table heating device. Analgesia by fentanyl was induced by using an initial bolus (5 µg/kg IV) followed by constant intravenous infusion of 5 µg/kg/h. Isoflurane or sevoflurane was administered by using calibrated vaporizers (AG model, Dräger). Anesthetic concentrations were monitored (Julian, Dräger) and the vaporizer frequently adjusted to maintain an end-expired agent concentration of 1 MAC.

Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring during the procedure allowed us to determine the incidence and type of ventricular arrhythmias (extrasystoles, fibrillation). Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded every 10 min: CO2 expired fraction, expired anesthesia gases (Julian, Dräger), heart rate, partial saturation of oxygen, and invasive arterial pressures (M1166 A Model 66S, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA).

Endovascular surgical technique.

The endovascular surgical technique was performed as previously described elsewhere.50 The left carotid artery was surgically dissected and cannulated with a 7-French arterial introducer (Avanti+, Cordis Europa NV, Roden, Netherlands). By using a portable radiologic source (GE Stenoscop, GE Medical Systems, Piscataway, NJ) for fluoroscopy guidance, the left main coronary artery was intubated with a 6-French guiding catheter (length, 40 cm; JR 3.5, Cordynamic, Iberhospitex, Barcelona, Spain) that was custom-designed for the protocol. A baseline coronary angiography was performed. A standard angioplasty guidewire (Hi-Torque Balance Middle-Weight 0.014″, Guidant Europe, Diegem, Belgium) then was introduced to the segment most distal to the anterior descending artery. A coaxial angioplasty balloon (diameter, 3 mm; length, 15 mm; Cordynamic, Iberhospitex) was placed in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (distally to the first diagonal branch) and inflated to a nominal pressure of 8 atm to achieve complete occlusion (Figure 1). The artery was occluded for 75 min, after which the occlusive balloon catheter was deflated and withdrawn, and the reperfusion was verified. A premounted stainless steel stent (3 × 18 mm; Apolo, Iberhospitex) was implanted into occlusion zone (Figure 1). After coronary angiography to confirm adequate flow in the epicardial artery, all catheters were withdrawn from the endovascular system, the incision surgically closed, anesthesia was suspended, and pigs were weaned from mechanical ventilation and transferred to the postsurgery recovery suite. The animals were euthanized after 2 mo of follow-up.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (distally to the first diagonal branch) by using coaxial angioplasty balloon.

Drug protocol.

Antiplatelet therapy consisted of daily oral doses of clopidogrel (75 mg) and acetylsalicylic acid (125 mg), beginning the day before surgery and continuing until the end of follow-up. Anticoagulation was achieved with 50 UI/kg heparin IV bolus on accessing the artery followed by an infusion rate of 10 UI/kg/h through the guiding catheter. Prophylactic antibiotics used were amoxicillin–clavulanic acid with a single preintervention dose of 12.5 mg/kg IM and subsequently continued by 350 mg PO every 12 h for 5 d. All pigs received the same antiarrhythmic protocol. Amiodarone (5 mg/kg/h) was administered by continuous infusion throughout the procedure and, in case of ventricular fibrillation, lidocaine (2 mg/kg IV) was administered to decrease later incidence of fibrillation and external electrical defibrillation was applied (43100A Defibrillator, Hewlett-Packard) by using initial loads of 300 J (as much as 360 J in cases of repeat applications). Postoperative analgesia was maintained with buprenorphine (0.01 mg/kg IM every 8 h) for 3 d.

Statistical analysis.

All data are expressed as mean ± 1 SD or 95% confidence interval. To identify significant differences in hemodynamic variables (arterial pressure, saturation of peripheral O2) between groups, one-way ANOVA was applied by using the Epi Info 3.4.3 program (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA). Comparisons between individual pigs at different time points were made by using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA technique. Mortality and incidence of ventricular fibrillation were compared among the 3 groups by using the χ2 test and Fisher exact tests. A P value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All procedures for transient occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery were done according to the prespecified protocol. No pigs had noteworthy complications from anesthesia.

Hemodynamic data.

After the occlusion of the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery, all animals experienced a gradual decrease both in heart rate and in arterial pressures, with partial recovery at reperfusion (Table 1). However, compared with those that received isoflurane, pigs in the sevoflurane group showed better hemodynamic stability during the procedure. Mean arterial pressure was significantly ((P < 0.005 for all comparisons) higher throughout the entire procedure in the sevoflurane group as compared with the isoflurane group (Table 1). Heart rate was also slightly higher in the sevoflurane group, reaching statistical significance at the end of arterial occlusion (sevoflurane, 78.7 ± 12.22 bpm; isoflurane, 70.6 ± 7.71 bpm; P < 0.05) and at reperfusion (sevoflurane, 87.7 ± 14.57 bpm; isoflurane, 76.1 ± 9.96 bpm; P < 0.05).

Table 1.

Hemodynamic data (mean ± 1 SD) before and during occlusion and after reperfusion.

Time after occlusion (min)
Before occlusion 0 30 60 After reperfusion
Isoflurane (n = 16)
 Heart rate (b/min) 89.6 ± 11.47 80.1 ± 12.10 73.5 ± 8.98 70.6 ± 7.71a 76.1 ± 9.96a
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 90.3 ± 8.63b 75.4 ± 9.64b 68 ± 7.91b 67.8 ± 8.06b 69.8 ± 10.88b
 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 63.2 ± 8.63 53.6 ± 10.49 47.3 ± 6.71b 47.5 ± 5.63b 49.5 ± 6.95b
 Median arterial pressure (mm Hg) 75.3 ± 8.30a 62.9 ± 10.49b 56.6 ± 7.05b 56.8 ± 6.07b 59.2 ± 8.83b
Sevoflurane (n = 29)
 Heart rate (bpm) 84.6 ± 7.65 79.3 ± 7.00 76.2 ± 11.19 78.7 ± 12.22 87.7 ± 14.57
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 102.4 ± 11.12 86 ± 10.70 82.9 ± 6.51 83.6 ± 7.11 83.7 ± 9.37
 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 72.7 ± 12.19 62.3 ± 9.22 59.3 ± 5.86 61.5 ± 6.90 59.1 ± 4.16
 Median blood pressure (mm Hg) 88 ± 12.33 72.3 ± 9.81 70.6 ± 6.91 70.4 ± 4.63 70.8 ± 5.15
a

Value significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different from that for sevoflurane group

b

Value significantly (P ≤ 0.005) different from that for sevoflurane group

Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.

In our study, all pigs experienced ventricular extrasystoles after induction of acute myocardial ischemia. The presence of these episodes was much more frequent (P < 0.001) in 3 different periods: within the first 10 min after coronary occlusion (13.9% of all episodes), within the first 20 to 40 min after occlusion (52.8%), and within the first 10 min after reperfusion (13.8%); 19.5% of ventricular extrasystoles occurred at various other times throughout the monitoring period.

The global incidence of ventricular fibrillation in our study was 62.2% (28 of 45 pigs). In the isoflurane group, ventricular fibrillation occurred in 13 of the 16 pigs (81.3%); these episodes were distributed as follows: 19% within the first 10 min after the occlusion of the artery, 38.1% within the first 20 to 40 min of ischemia, 23.8% within the first 10 min after reperfusion, and the remaining 19% arbitrarily distributed during the rest of the time. In the sevoflurane group, ventricular fibrillation occurred in 15 of the 29 animals (51.7%), with all episodes occurring during the occlusion period: 6.6% within first 10 min of ischemia, 73.4% within the first 20 to 40 min of ischemia, and the remaining 20.0% arbitrarily distributed during the rest of the time. In addition, no episodes of ventricular fibrillation took place after reperfusion (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of episodes of ventricular fibrillation (%) relative to time after occlusion and reperfusion in the 2 groups.

The risk of suffering ventricular fibrillation was 1.57 times higher in the isoflurane group than in the sevoflurane group (relative risk, 1.57 [95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.40]; P < 0.05). In addition, the number of ventricular fibrillation episodes per animal was significantly (P = 0.008) higher in the isoflurane group, in which 2 pigs (12.5%) had 2 ventricular fibrillation episodes and 3 (18.75%) experienced 3 episodes throughout the procedure, but no recurrent ventricular fibrillation episodes were detected in the sevoflurane group (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Number of episodes of ventricular fibrillation per animal (%) in both groups.

Mortality.

In the isoflurane group, 4 premature deaths occurred: 2 pigs died due to ventricular fibrillation during the procedure, and 2 pigs died due to heart failure within 24 h after the procedure. However, in the sevoflurane group, only one animal died (at 2 h after myocardial reperfusion); the cause of death was irreversible cardiogenic shock without ventricular arrhythmias. There is a strong trend (P = 0.04) toward a lower survival rate in the isoflurane group (75.0%) as compared with the sevoflurane group (96.4%).

Discussion

In general, sufficient anesthesia results in a well-balanced combination of sedation, analgesia, hypnosis, and muscle relaxation. Selection of an appropriate anesthetic regimen requires consideration of the goals of the investigation as well as the possible side effects of the chosen anesthetic drugs.30,59

Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury can lead to severe complications, and measures to minimize myocardial damage have been an important target of research. Because some anesthetics may provide protection,36,53 increased understanding of the role of anesthetics in the prevention of myocardial injury may provide anesthesiologists with strategies to improve outcome. The use of particular anesthetics for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia is one such approach proposed to protect against the adverse effects of ischemia.

In our study, arterial pressures differed between the 2 groups of pigs before ischemia and during the procedure; the values throughout the procedure were higher in the sevoflurane group. This beneficial cardiovascular effect of sevoflurane over isoflurane has been confirmed in pigs and other species.5,63 Swine anesthetized with isoflurane had significantly lower arterial pressures than did those that received equipotent concentrations of sevoflurane.37 The authors of another study21 concluded that mean arterial pressure in horses is better maintained with sevoflurane than isoflurane. Nevertheless, other studies did not confirm this difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane in terms of hemodynamic effects8,9,26,39

We noted a decrease in the heart rates of both groups as acute myocardial ischemia was provoked. This phenomenon has been described previously2 and attributed to pronounced increase in vagal tone.38 Conversely, other authors have demonstrated a significant increase in heart rate2,22,64 and decrease in arterial pressure2,22 with myocardial reperfusion, which results are consistent with our findings.

The increased hemodynamic stability we noted with sevoflurane could explain its potential cardioprotective effect. In addition, halogenated anesthetics exhibit cardioprotective properties at therapeutic doses, independent of their anesthetic and hemodynamic effect, leading to the concept of anesthetic preconditioning.35

As previously described,24,57 all of our pigs showed premature ventricular complexes associated with the induction of ischemia. These premature complexes clustered around 3 concrete periods: during the first minutes after coronary occlusion, at approximately 30 min after occlusion, and after myocardial reperfusion. Other authors4,7 have described similar results, although the clustering of episodes around the periods we observed was not characterized completely. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation after occlusion of the left interventricular artery in the pig is very high,29,32,34,42,58,60,66 with observed rates ranging from 50% to 75%3,4,25,34,39,42 to 100%.6,11,47,65

Numerous authors indicate that volatile anesthetic cause reduction of cardiac arrhythmias.14,45 In our study, the lower rates of ventricular fibrillation that we obtained (51.7%) were due to administration of sevoflurane to a concentration of 1 MAC throughout anesthetic maintenance, a fundamental condition to obtain myocardial protection, according to various studies.43-45 In addition, none of our sevoflurane pigs experienced episodes of ventricular fibrillation after reperfusion, a result that supports the claim that administration of sevoflurane before, during, and after ischemia reduces the incidence of ventricular fibrillation after reperfusion.44,45 The antiarrhythmic effects of sevoflurane have been confirmed in multiple studies, in which the agent was implicated in decreasing the calcium concentration within the myocyte, myocardial contractility,43,44,46,56 and myocardial oxygen demand.54

Due to the high susceptibility of pigs to developing fatal arrhythmias during coronary occlusion, rates of mortality can get to be high. A 33% mortality rate due to ventricular fibrillation is common in this porcine model of myocardial ischemia.32 In the present study, total mortality in the isoflurane group was 25% (12.5% during the myocardial ischemia and 12.5% within 24 h after procedure). However, in the sevoflurane group, total mortality was 3.57%, with only a single pig dying (due to cardiogenic shock). Reported rates of mortality in similar studies of myocardial ischemia in pigs vary: 10%,69 16%,58 20%,20,23,25,34 30% to 35%,27,49 75%,40 and even 90%.7 Therefore, in the current study, administration of sevoflurane during anesthetic maintenance yielded a survival rate of 96.4%, surpassing those in other similar studies of myocardial ischemia.

The cardioprotective properties of volatile anesthetics have been studied for several decades and currently constitute powerful tools in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Volatile agents consistently reduce perioperative myocardial infarction and mortality in cardiac surgery when compared with total intravenous anesthesia.36 Some studies in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery have found some evidence showing that sevoflurane has better myocardial protection than do intravenous agents like propofol.12,18,17,68

Our study has several potential limitations. First, young and healthy animals are probably not the best model to reproduce all the conditions present in patients with ischemic heart disease. Further studies are warranted to assess the cardioprotective properties of volatile anesthetics in more representative models (for example, models of atherosclerotic animals). Second, the study design did not follow a randomized assignment of subjects to each group but sequential analysis of 2 different protocols of anesthesia. As we soon detected a potential benefit of sevoflurane, all subsequent procedures were performed by using this agent. Although doing so can be deemed a potential flaw of the described results, the rest of the procedure was performed exactly in the same way in both groups. In conclusion, in this porcine model of acute and severe myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, sevoflurane was associated with higher hemodynamic stability, fewer ventricular arrhythmias, and less mortality than was isoflurane.

References

  • 1.Balen EM, Saez MJ, Cienfuegos JA, Zazpe CM, Ferrer JV, Herrera J, Lera JM. 2000. Anatomia del cerdo aplicada a la experimentacion en cirugia general. Cir Esp 67:586–593 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banz Y, Hess OM, Robson SC, Mettler D, Meier P, Haeberli A, Csizmadia E, Korchagina EY, Bovin NV, Rieben R. 2005. Locally targeted cytoprotection with dextran sulfate attenuates experimental porcine myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury. Eur Heart J 26:2334–2343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barrabés JA, García-Dorado D, González MA, Ruiz-Meana M, Solares J, Puigfel Y, Soler-Soler J. 1998. Regional expansion during myocardial ischemia predicts ventricular fibrillation and coronary reocclusion. Am J Phisiol 274:H 1767–H1775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barrabés JA, García-Dorado D, Padilla F, Agulló L, Trobo L, Carballo J, Soler-Soler J. 2002. Ventricular fibrillation during acute coronary occlusion is related to the dilation of the ischemic region. Basic Res Cardiol 97:445–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barter LS, Ilkiw JE, Steffey EP, Pypendop BH, Imai A. 2004. Animal dependence of inhaled anaesthetic requeriments in cats. Br J Anaesth 92:275–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bergey JL, Nocella K, Mccallum JD. 1982. Acute coronary artery occlusion–reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in rats, dogs, and pigs: antiarrhythmic evaluation of quinidine, procainamide, and lidocaine. Eur J Pharmacol 81:205–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bergey JL, Wendt RL, Nocella K, Mccallum JD. 1984. Acute coronary artery occlusion–reperfusion arrhythmias in pigs: antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory evaluation of verapamil, nifedipine, prenylamine, and propranolol. Eur J Pharmacol 97:95–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bernard JM, Woulters PF, Doursout MF, Florence B, Chelly JE, Merin RG. 1990. Effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on cardiac and coronary dynamics in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 72:659–662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cahalan MK. 1996. Hemodynamic effects of inhaled anesthetics (review courses), p 14–18 Cleveland (OH): International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coetzee JF, Le Roux PJ, Genade S, Lochner A. 2000. Reduction of postischemic contractile dysfunction of the isolated rat heart by sevoflurane: comparison with halothane. Anesth Analg 90:1089–1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Conradie S, Coetzee A, Coetzee J. 1999. Anesthetic modulation of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in pigs: comparison between halothane and sevoflurane. Can J Anaesth 46:71–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Conzen PF, Fischer S, Detter C, Peter K. 2003. Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 99:826–833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cooper WD, Kuan P, Reuben SR, Vanderburg MJ. 1984. Cardiac arrhythmias following acute myocardial infarction: associations with the serum potassium level and prior diuretic therapy. Eur Heart J 5:464–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cope DK, Impastato WK, Cohen MV, Downey JM. 1997. Volatile anesthetics protect the ischemic rabbit myocardium from infarction. Anesthesiology 86:699–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Council of the European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Off J Eur Communities L358:1-28 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crick SJ, Sheppard MN, Ho SY, Gebstein L, Anderson RH. 1998. Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. J Anat 193:105–119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Hert SG, Cromheecke S, Ten Broecke PW, Mertens E, De Blier IG, Stockman BA, Rodrigues IE, Van der Linden PJ. 2003. Effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on recovery of myocardial function after coronary surgery in elderly high-risk patients. Anesthesiology 99:314–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Hert SG, Ten Broecke PW, Mertens E, Van Sommeren EW, De Blier IG, Stockman BA, Rodrigues IE. 2002. Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology 97:42–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deutsch N, Hantler CB, Tait AR, Uprichard A, Schork MA, Knigth PR. 1990. Supression of ventricular arrhythmia by volatile anesthetics in a canine model of chronic myocardial infarction. Anesthesiology 72:1012–1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dib N, Diethrich EB, Campbell A, Gahremanpour A, McGarry M, Opie S. 2006. A percutaneous swine model of myocardial infarction. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 53:256–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Driessen B, Nann L, Benton R, Boston R. 2006. Differences in need for hemodynamic support in horses anesthetized with sevoflurane as compared to isoflurane. Vet Anaesth Analg 33:356–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Du Toit E, Hofmann D, McCarthy J, Pineda C. 2001. Effect of levosimendan on myocardial contractility coronary and peripheral blood flow, and arrhythmias during coronary artery ligation and reperfusion in the in vivo pig model. Heart 86:81–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Freyman T, Polin G, Osman H, Crary J, Lu M, Cheng L, Palasis M, Wilensky RL. 2006. A quantitative, randomized study evaluating three methods of mesenchymal stem cell delivery following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 27:1114–1122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Garcia-Dorado D, Theroux P, Elizaga J, Galinanes M, Solares J, Riesgo M, Gomez MJ, Garcia-Dorado A, Fernandez Aviles F. 1987. Myocardial reperfusion in the pig heart model: infarct size and duration of coronary occlusion. Cardiovasc Res 21:537–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gourine AV, Bulhak A, Gonon AT, Pernow J, Sjoquist P. 2002. Cardioprotective effect induced by brief exposure to nitric oxide before myocardial ischemia–reperfusion in vivo. Nitric Oxide 7:210–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grosenbaugh DA, Muir WW. 1998. Cardiorespiratory effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halotane anesthesia in horses. Am J Vet Res 59:101–106 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haas F, Nguyen N, Schad H, Heimisch W, Haehnel C, Weigand G, Ehrhard W, Meisner H, Schwaiger M. 1999. Effect on coronary artery flow reserve and resistance the remote area after acute coronary artery occlusion in the pig model. J Nucl Cardiol 6:507–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haworth RA, Goknur AB. 1995. Inhibition of sodium–calcium exchange and calcium channels of heart cells by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 82:1255–1265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hughes HC. 1986. Swine in cardiovascular research. Lab Anim Sci 36:348–350 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kaiser GM, Fruhauf NR, Zhang HW, Westermann S, Bolle I, Oldhafer KJ, Broelsch CE. 2003. Intravenous infusion anesthesia with propofol–midazolam–fentanyl for experimental surgery in swine. J Invest Surg 16:353–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Katsuoka M, Kobayashi K, Ohnishi ST. 1989. Volatile anesthetics decrease calcium content of isolated myocytes. Anesthesiology 70:954–960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kraitchman DL, Bluemke DA, Chin BB, Heldman AW, Heldman AW. 2000. A minimally invasive method for creating coronary stenosis in a swine model for MRI and SPECT imaging. Invest Radiol 35:445–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kroll DA, Knigth PR. 1984. Antifibrilatory effects of volatile anesthetics in acute occlusion–reperfusion arrhythmia. Anesthesiology 61:657–661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Krombach GA, Kinzel S, Mahnken AH, Günther RW, Buecker A. 2005. Minimally invasive closed-chest method for creating reperfused or occlusive myocardial infarction in swine. Invest Radiol 40:14–18 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Landoni G, Fochi O, Torri G. 2008. Cardiac protection by volatile anaesthetics: a review. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 6:108–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Landoni G, Zambon M, Zangrillo A. 2009. Reducing perioperative myocardial infarction with anesthetic drugs and techniques. Curr Drug Targets 10:858–862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lerman J, Gallaguer TM, Miyasaka K, Volgyesi GA, Burrows FA. 1990. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and hemodynamic effects of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in newborn swine. Anesthesiology 73:717–721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marques J, Mendoza I, Moleiro F. 1997. Manejo de las arritmias en el infarto agudo de miocardio. Avances Cardiol 17:145–154 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matthews NS, Hartsfield SM, Mercer D, Beleau MH, MacKenthun A. 1998. Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in horses: comparison to isoflurane and effects of postmedication with xylacine. Vet Surg 27:480–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mehta JL, Nichols WW, Saldeen TG. 1990. Superoxide dismutase decreases reperfusion arrhythmias and preserves myocardial function during thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 16:112–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nader-Djalal N, Knight PR. 1998. Volatile anesthetic effects on ischemic myocardium. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 4:403–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Naslund U, Haggmark S, Johansson G, Marklund L, Reiz S. 1992. A closed-chest myocardial occlusion–reperfusion model in the pig: techniques, morbidity and mortality. Eur Heart J 13:1282–1289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Obal D, Scharbatke J, Mullenheim J. 2002. Myocardial protection by preconditioning with sevoflurane is further enhanced by sevoflurane administration during reperfusion. Anesthesiology 96:A607 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oguchi T, Kashimoto S, Yamaguchi T, Masui K, Kumazawa T. 2001. Sevoflurane reduces dysrhythmias during reperfusion in the working rat heart. J Anesth 15:22–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oguchi T, Kashimoto S, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura T, Kumazawa T. 1995. Comparative effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on function and metabolism in the ischaemic rat heart. Br J Anaesth 74:569–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Park WK, Pancrazio JJ, Suh CK, Lynch CIII. 1996. Myocardial depressant effects of sevoflurane. Mechanical and electrophysiologic actions in vitro. Anesthesiology 84:1166–1176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Parker GW, Michael LH, Hartley CJ, Skinner JE, Entman ML. 1990. Central β-adrenergic mechanisms may modulate ischemic ventricular fibrillation in pigs. Circ Res 66:259–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Perez de Prado A, Cuellas-Ramon C, Regueiro-Purriños M, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Perez-Martinez C, Altonaga JR, Garcia-Iglesias MJ, Orden-Recio MA, Garcia-Marin JF, Fernandez-Vazquez F. 2009. Closed-chest experimental porcine model of acute myocardial infarction–reperfusion. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 60:301–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ravn HB, Moeldrup U, Brookes CI, Ilkjaer LB, White P, Chew M, Jensen L, Johnsen S, Birk-Soerensen L, Hjortdal VE. 1999. Intravenous magnesium reduces infarct size after ischemia–reperfusion injury combined with a thrombogenic lesion in the left anterior descending artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:569–574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Real Decreto 1201/2005. [Directive of 10 October 2005 about the protection of animals used in research and for other scientific purposes]. Boletín Oficial del Estado no. 252, 21/10/2005, 34367–34391. [Original regulation in Spanish]
  • 51.Reffelmann T, Sensebat O, Birnbaum Y, Stroemer E, Hanrath P, Uretsky BF. 2004. A novel minimal-invasive model of chronic myocardial infarction in swine. Coron Artery Dis 15:7–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rodrigues M, Silva AC, Aguas AP, Grande NR. 2005. The coronary circulation of the pig heart: comparison with the human heart. European Journal of Anatomy 9:67–87 [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ross S, Foex P. 1999. Protective effects of anaesthetics in reversible and irreversible ischemia–reperfusion injury. Br J Anaesth 82:622–632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sahlman L, Henriksson BA, Martner J, Ricksten SE. 1988. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on coronary vascular tone, myocardial performance, and oxygen consumption during controlled changes in aortic and left atrial pressure. Anesthesiology 69:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schaper W, Jageneau A, Xhonneux R. 1967. The development of collateral circulation in the pig and dog heart. Cardiologia 51:321–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Serita R, Morisaki H, Ai K. 2002. Sevoflurane preconditions stunned myocardium in septic but not healthy isolated rat hearts. Br J Anaesth 89:896–903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Smart SC, Sagar KB, Warltier DC. 1997. Differential roles of Ca++ channels and Na+–Ca++ exchange in myocardial reperfusion injury in open chest dogs: relative roles during ischemia and reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res 36:337–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Suzuki Y, Lyons JK, Yeung AC, Ikeno F. 2008. In vivo porcine model of reperfused myocardial infarction: in situ double staining to measure precise infarct area/area at risk. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:100–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Svendsen P, Rasmussen A. 1998. Anaesthesia of minipigs and basic surgical techniques. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 25:31–43 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Swindle MM, Horneffer PJ, Gardner TJ, Gott VL, Hall TS, Sturat RS, Baumgartner WA, Borkon AM, Galloway E, Reitz BA. 1986. Anatomic and anesthetic considerations in experimental cardiopulmonary surgery in swine. Lab Anim Sci 36:357–361 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tanaka K, Weihrauch D, Kehl F, Ludwig LM, LaDisa JF, Kersten JR, Pagel PS, Warltier DC. 2002. Mechanism of preconditioning by isoflurane in rabbits: a direct role for reactive oxygen species. Anesthesiology 97:1485–1490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tanguay M, Blaise G, Dumont L, Beique G, Hollmann C. 1991. Beneficial effects of volatile anesthetics on decrease in coronary flow and myocardial contractility induced by oxygen-derived free radicals in isolated rabbit hearts. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 18:863–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Teixeira S, Costa G, Costa F, da Silva Viana J, Mota A. 2007. Sevoflurane versus isoflurane: does it matter in renal transplantation? Transplant Proc 39:2486–2488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Turschner O, D'hooge J, Dommke C, Claus P, Verbeken E, De Scheerder I, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR. 2004. The sequential changes in myocardial thickness and thickening which occur during acute transmural infarction, infarct reperfusion and the resultant expression of reperfusion injury. Eur Heart J 25:794–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Verdouw PD, Remme WJ, Hugenholtz PG. 1977. Cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of aprindine (AC 1802) during partial occlusion of a coronary artery in the pig. Cardiovasc Res 11:317–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Verdouw PD, Wolfenbuttel BHR, Vander Giessen WJ. 1983. Domestic pigs in the study of myocardial ischemia. Eur Heart J 4:61–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Weaver ME, Pantely GA, Bristow JD, Ladley HD. 1986. A quantitative study of the anatomy and distribution of coronary arteries in swine in comparison with other animals and man. Cardiovasc Res 20:907–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yao YT, Li LH. 2009. Sevoflurane versus propofol for myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin Med Sci J 24:133–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhao JL, Yang Y, Cui C, You S, Wu Y, Gao R. 2006. Different effects of adenosine and calcium channel blockade on myocardial no-reflow after acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 20:167–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS are provided here courtesy of American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

RESOURCES