Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 Mar;74(3):312–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03919.x

Mutational analysis of PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1 in a cohort of patients with hypophosphatemic rickets

Mary D Ruppe 1,3, Patrick G Brosnan 2,3, Kit Sing Au 2, Phong X Tran 2, Barbara W Dominguez 2,3, Hope Northrup 2,3
PMCID: PMC3035757  NIHMSID: NIHMS250099  PMID: 21050253

Summary

Background

X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets, autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets and autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets make up a group of renal phosphate wasting disorders with common clinical and biochemical characteristics. These three types of rickets are related to mutations in PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1, respectively.

Objective

The objective of the study was to evaluate the frequency of mutations that occur in these three genes associated with hypophosphatemic rickets.

Patients and Methods

In this study, we sequenced these genes in 76 members of 46 kindreds from a large hypophosphatemic rickets cohort.

Results

Forty two individuals from 27 kindreds were found to have mutations in PHEX, 16 of which were novel. One subject had an FGF23 mutation. No individuals were found to have mutations in DMP1 consistent with the presence of recessive hypophosphatemic rickets.

Conclusions

Our data highlight the wide spectrum of genetic variation that can be seen in PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1 when screening a large cohort with hypophosphatemic rickets.

Keywords: PHEX, FGF23, DMP1 in phosphate rickets

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hypophosphatemic rickets suffer from lower extremity deformities, bone and/or joint pain, short stature and dental abnormalities. The skeletal defects are primarily caused by defects in phosphate metabolism; in particular, hypophosphatemia from renal phosphate wasting. In normal subjects, hypophosphatemia is accompanied by elevated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels but in patients with hypophophatemic rickets no such elevation is observed leading to a dual defect in phosphate and vitamin D metabolism.

First reported in 1939 1, X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH; MIM # 307800) is the most common genetic form of hypophosphatemic rickets with an incidence of 3.9–5 per 100,000 23. XLH is associated with inactivating mutations in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome (PHEX; MIM# 300550)4. Located at Xp22.2-p22.1, the PHEX gene produces a protein of unclear function that is expressed primarily in cells of bone lineage, including osteoblasts, osteocytes and odontoblasts 57. To date more than two hundred different mutations of the PHEX gene have been described in patients with hypophosphatemic rickets (http://www.phexdb.mcgill.ca/).

A less common genetic form of hypophosphatemic rickets is autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR; MIM # 193100). While ADHR and XLH share clinical and biochemical characteristics, ADHR has incomplete penetrance, variable age of onset and may resolve later in life 8. ADHR is defined by a mutation located at 12p13.3 in the gene that produces the fibroblast growth factor 23 protein (FGF23; MIM# 605380)910. Like the PHEX protein, FGF23 is predominantly expressed in cells of bone lineage, including osteocytes, osteoblasts and odontoblasts 1112. ADHR patients have a mutation at a proprotein convertase cleavage site that prevents proteolytic degradation and inactivation of the FGF23 protein1314.

Another rare genetic form of hypophosphatemic rickets is autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets (ARHR; MIM # 241520). ARHR is defined by mutations in dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1; MIM# 600980) located at 4q21 15 16. DMP1 is one of a cluster of genes encoding a class of tooth and bone noncollagenous matrix proteins known as SIBLING (small integrin-binding ligand, N-linked glycoproteins) 17. Loss of function mutations in DMP1 have been reported in 7 kindreds with ARHR1516, 1819.

In familial cases, hypophosphatemic rickets can be inherited in either an X-linked, autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive manner. The most common gene found to be mutated in these cases is PHEX leading to XLH. Frequently sporadic cases are found to have mutations in PHEX which are presumed to be de novo mutations 20. Rarely, mutations are found in FGF23 or DMP1. The Mendelian inheritance pattern of sporadic cases with no mutations found in the three genes is unclear. In order to extend our knowledge about the frequency of mutations that cause hypophosphatemic rickets, we studied a large cohort of patients at an orthopedics specialty hospital. Seventy-six patients were evaluated, and the sequence of their PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1 genes determined.

Patients and methods

Patients

Patients were included in the study based on laboratory parameters that included reduced serum phosphorus and reduced tubular resorption of phosphate corrected for glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) according to age-adjusted standards. There needed to be no elevation of the serum calcitriol level or urinary calcium level to rule out hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria. Additionally, there was documentation of no glycosuria, bicarbonaturia or aminoaciduria which is seen in Fanconi syndrome. Detailed four generational pedigrees were obtained from each patient along with information on their racial background. Patients were excluded if clinical or biochemical features were not consistent with the three known variants of hypophosphatemic rickets, XLH, ADHR or ARHR.

Study approval was received from the Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS) at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, Texas and the Shriners Hospital legal council in Tampa, Florida. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their parents for mutational analysis.

Methods

Mutational Analysis

DNA was extracted from whole blood utilizing Gentra Puregene DNA kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) or PaxGene DNA kits (Qiagen). All exonic sequences along with flanking intronic sequences of PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1 were amplified. PCR primers were based on the published primers for PHEX, FGF23 or DMP1 15, 2124. The PCR products were sequenced utilizing the forward or reverse primers or a redesigned sequencing primer. Direct sequencing was carried out via an ABI 3100 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) following standard protocol for BigDye (Applied Biosystems) terminator sequencing. Sequencing results were aligned with the genomic DNA sequence utilizing the NCBI BLAST program (http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/wblast2.cgi) or clustalW (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/ClustalW.html). When alignment of multiple sequence fragments was necessary, CodonCode Aligner was used (CodonCode Corporation, Dedham, MA). Nucleotide changes in the intronic region were analyzed using a splice site prediction tool (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) which finds possible 5′ and 3′ splice sites based on a neural network based approach. A mutation was determined to be disease-causing when the nucleotide change was either 1) a previously reported mutation in the PHEX database (http://www.phexdb.mcgill.ca/), 2) predicted to cause protein truncation or 3) disrupted a splice site. The controls were either a parent of the sporadic proband or unaffected members of the familial cohorts. Additionally, the bioinformatics tools PolyPhen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/) and SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/) were used to determine the functional effects of all the missense mutations. These tools use physical and comparative considerations to predict the impact of amino acid substitution on the structure and function of proteins. Position Specific Independent Counts (PSIC) score 25 calculates the profile matrix with PolyPhen outcome representing the difference between profile scores of the allelic variants with larger values indicating rare or never observed substitution. The Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) score 26 represents the normalized probability that the amino acid change is tolerated. Scores less than 0.05 are predicted to be deleterious. Finally, the SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/) was searched for previous reports of the variants.

Laboratory Evaluation

Samples for the laboratory tests were obtained during scheduled clinic visits. The serum and urine chemistries were performed on the day of the visit utilizing a Siemens Xpand Integrated Chemistry System (Siemens, Deerfield, IL). The TmP/GFR was calculated using the method of Walton and Bijvoet for adults 27 and using the method described by Stark 28 for children. Serum for the FGF23 levels was aliquoted and frozen on the day of the clinic visit. The samples were stored at −80 C until analysis. The FGF23 levels were measured utilizing a full length ELISA assay (Kainos, Japan). The assay was performed and the data analyzed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Results

From 1998–2009, patients from 70 kindreds with renal phosphate wasting disorders have been evaluated at the Shriners Hospital for Children in Houston. Of these, seven individuals representing 7 kindreds were diagnosed with other condition associated with renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemic rickets. These subjects had linear nevus sebaceous syndrome (2 individuals) and McCune Albright Syndrome (5 individuals). Of the remaining 63 kindreds, members of 46 kindreds were available for the study.

Based on the obtained pedigrees, a familial inheritance pattern was established in 20 of the 46 kindreds examined; the remaining 26 kindreds contained sporadic cases, assumed to be a new genetic event which could be consistent with any form of hypophosphatemic rickets. Ethnically, 21 kindreds were Hispanic (46%), 22 non-Hispanic Whites (48%), 2 African American (4%) and 1 Asian American (2%). Included in the mutational analysis were 76 patients (26 male and 50 female) from the 46 kindreds and 18 unaffected family members (8 male and 10 female).

PHEX mutational analysis

We identified 27 PHEX mutations in 27 kindreds (12 familial and 15 sporadic); no PHEX mutations were found in the other 19 kindreds (Table 1 lists each mutation and Table 2 summarizes their racial and inheritance characteristics). Of the 27 PHEX mutations, 7 were missense mutations (26%), 6 were nonsense mutations (22.2%), 5 were splice site mutations (18.5%), 5 were deletions (18.5%) and 4 were insertions (14.8%). Additionally, there was one synonymous change seen (Table 3). Six of the 7 missense mutations were analyzed using the SIFT and PolyPhen. Five of the 6 that were analyzed were found to be damaging (Table 3). The seventh missense mutation was not analyzed as it disrupted a stop codon (see below) and it is not possible to analyze this type of change with the software.

Table 1.

Variants, excluding synonymous changes found in PHEX and FGF23

Gene Kindred Location Genomic DNA Type Protein Type Mutation
PHEX 8 E1 58 C>T Replacement 20 R>X nonsense Not novel
PHEX 37 E3 212 A>C Replacement 79 N>T missense Novel
PHEX 38 E4 397 C>T Replacement 133 Q>X nonsense Not novel
PHEX 18 E5 482 G>C Replacement 161 R>P missense Novel
PHEX 23 E6 674 delA Deletion 225 A>E, 238>X frameshift, nonsense Novel
PHEX 3 I7 849 + 1 G>T Replacement 283 splice Splice site mutation Not novel
PHEX 27 E9 1042 delA Deletion 348 K>K, 354 L>X frameshift, nonsense Not novel
PHEX 32 I9 1079 +1 G>A Replacement 360 splice Splice site mutation Not novel
PHEX 26 E10 1163insA Insertion 389 F>I frameshift Novel
PHEX 25 E6–10 662 -1175del Deletion del222 -392 deletion Novel
PHEX 21 E11 1230 G>T Replacement 411 E>X nonsense Novel
PHEX 41 E11 1305insC Insertion 406 C>L, 411 E>X frameshift, nonsense Novel
PHEX 34 E12 1348 T>C Replacement 450 L>P missense Novel
PHEX 30 I13 1483+1 G>C Replacement 494 splice Splice site mutation Not novel
PHEX 29 E14 1522 C>T Replacement 508 Q>X nonsense Not novel
PHEX 12 E15 1601 C>T Replacement 534 P>L missense Not novel
PHEX 22 E16 1658 G>A Replacement 553 G>E missense Novel
PHEX 36 E16 1699 C>T Replacement 567 R>X nonsense Not novel
PHEX 17 E17 1705_6delCT Deletion 569 L>E, 580H>X frameshift, nonsense Novel
PHEX 9 E17 1727_1738del Deletion 576D V>D, del577_580 missense, deletion Novel
PHEX 39 I17 1768 −1 G>C Replacement 591 splice Splice site mutation Novel
PHEX 5 E18 1847insCAAA Insertion 616 K>N, 621 Q>X frameshift, nonsense Novel
PHEX 46 I18 1899 + 1 G>T Replacement 633 splice Splice site mutation Not novel
PHEX 19 E19 1936 G>A Replacement 646 D>N missense Novel
PHEX 44 E20 1966insGCTT Insertion 657 Y>C, 664 R>X frameshift, nonsense Novel
PHEX 10 E22 2239 C>T Replacement 747 R>X nonsense Not novel
PHEX 35 E22 2249 A>T Replacement 750 X>L missense Novel
FGF23 47 E3 535 C>T Replacement 179 R>W missense Not novel

Table 2.

The presence of PHEX and FGF23 mutations by racial and inheritance characteristics

Kindreds PHEX mutation FGF23 mutation
Ethnicity non-Hispanic Whites 22 9 (41%) 1(100%)
Hispanic 21 15 (71%) 0
African American 2 2 (100%) 0
Asian American 1 1 (100%) 0
Inheritance Familial 20 12 (60%) 0
Sporadic 26 15 (58%) 1 (100%)

Table 3.

PolyPhen and SIFT evaluation of missense variants and reporting of synonomous changes found in PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1

Gene Kindreds Variant PolyPhen PSIC SIFT SIFT score dbSNP ID
PHEX 37 c.212 A>C, p. 79 N>T Probably Damaging 2.133 Damaging 0.01 Novel
18 c. 482 G>C, p. 161 R>P Benign 1.044 Tolerated 0.27 Novel
37 c. 1118 C>T, p. 373 S>S Synonymous N/A Synonymous N/A Novel
34 c. 1348 T>C, p. 450 L>P Probably Damaging 2.541 Damaging 0 Novel
12 c. 1601 C>T, p. 534 P>L Probably Damaging 2.768 Damaging 0.05 Novel1
22 c. 1658 G>A, p. 553 G>E Probably Damaging 2.543 Damaging 0 Novel
19 c. 1936 G>A, p. 646 D>N Probably Damaging 2.543 Damaging 0 Novel
FGF23 46 c. 535 C>T, p. 79 R>W Probably Damaging 2.654 Damaging 0 rs28937882:A
2,13,22,32, 34,39 c. 716 C>T, p. 239 T>M Benign 0.183 Tolerated 0.25 rs7955866:T
DMP1 2,5,8,14,27, 33,42 c. 1230 G>A, p.410 E>E Synonymous N/A Synonymous N/A rs2615497:A
8 c. 1255 C>T, p. 419 P>S Benign N/A Tolerated 0.15 Novel
2,6,10,15,35,37,41 c. 205 A>T, p. 69 S>C Possibly Damaging 1.773 Damaging Low confidence 0 rs10019009:T
18,27,33,42 c. 1218 C>T, p.406 S>S Synonymous N/A Synonymous N/A rs2615498:T
27 c. 879 T>C, p. 293 S>S Synonymous N/A Synonymous N/A Novel
25 c. 475 C>A, p. 159 Q>K Possibly Damaging 1.736 Damaging 0.03 rs79402270:A
40 c. 753 T>A, p. 251 T>T Synonymous N/A Synonymous N/A Novel
1

Although the mutation that was described for kindred 12 (c.1601 C>T, p. 534 P>L) has previously been reported in XLH and appears in the PHEX database, it does not have an identifier in the dbSNP. Therefore, it is listed as “not novel” as a mutation in Table 1 but “novel” for a dbSNP ID in Table 3.

Sixteen of the 27 PHEX mutations have not previously been reported; one novel mutation was particularly interesting. A sporadic mutation in an affected child from kindred 35 was a missense mutation in which the stop codon for the last exon (exon 22) in the PHEX gene was mutated. Because another in-frame stop codon is found downstream, this mutation should result in the production of the full length PHEX protein with an additional 10 amino acid fragment (LWLGRWFMAS).

A probably damaging missense mutation in exon 19 (c.1936 G>A, p.646 D>N) was found in the proband of kindred 19 who at the time of initial presentation was thought to be the only affected member of the cohort. There were four members of the kindred tested. The proband was a female who was heterozygous for the mutation. Prior to treatment at the age of 3, she displayed hypophosphatemia (0.6 mmol/L; normal range for age 1.45–1.78 mmol/L), decreased TmP/GFR (0.68–0.74 mmol/L; normal range for age 28 1.3–1.5 mmol/L) and severe lower extremity bowing requiring hemiepiphysiodesis. On treatment FGF23 levels were elevated (100–120 pg/mL, normal range 10–50 pg/mL). A subsequent off treatment FGF23 level at the age of 14 remained elevated at 80 pg/mL with a simultaneous serum phosphate level 0.6 mmol/L (normal range for age 28 0.87–1.45 mmol/L). The brother of the proband was hemizygous for the mutation and had normal serum phosphate (1.5 mmol/L) when he was initially evaluated at the age of 4. He has maintained his serum phosphorus at a normal level through the age of ten (1.45–1.60 mmol/L; normal range for age 1.45–1.78 mmol/L) with the exception of a single measurement of 1.10 mmol/L. During this time, he has had persistently low TmP/GFR (0.88–1.12 mmol/L; normal range for age normal range for age 28 1.3–1.5 mmol/L), high normal to slightly elevated FGF23 (37–54 pg/mL), no lower extremity bowing, extreme short stature (<3% for height) and frontal bossing. The mother of the proband was heterozygous for the mutation, and had normal height, no evidence of lower extremity bowing, low normal serum phosphate 0.90 mmol/L; normal range for age 0.8 mmol/L– 1.55 mmol/L), low TmP/GFR 0.88 mmol/L (normal range for age 1.12–1.76 mmol/L) and slightly high FGF23 (57 pg/mL). The father was unaffected and had a normal genotype.

FGF23 mutational analysis

We identified one disease causing FGF23 mutation. The proband was a female with sporadic inheritance who was diagnosed with hypophosphatemia during an evaluation for lower extremity bowing at one year of age. Her mutation was located at c.535C>T, p.179R>W which is a previously reported mutation at the consensus sequence for the proprotein convertase cleavage site.

An additional FGF23 variant was identified outside the consensus sequences and was thus assumed to be non-disease causing. The variant consisted of a single amino acid replacement (c.716C>T, p.239T>M), a change evaluated by SIFT and PolyPhen as benign (Table 3).

Four of the 6 families with the benign FGF23 variants also were found to have PHEX mutations.

DMP1 mutational analysis

None of the 46 kindreds were found to have a homozygous DMP1 mutation or a compound heterozygous mutation consistent with the development of ARHR.

Seven heterozygous variants in DMP1 were found, all located in exon 6 (Table 3). Four of the variants were synonymous and three were missense. Two of the nonsynonymous changes were evaluated by SIFT and PolyPhen as possibly damaging (c.205A>T, p.69S>C and c.475C>A, p.159Q>K).

The first possibly damaging missense mutation was found in one family, who was also found to have a PHEX mutation. The second possibly damaging missense mutation was found in 7 families, 4 of which also had PHEX mutations. This suggests that these genetic variants are not responsible for the disease.

Discussion

We performed a genetic analysis of the PHEX, FGF23 and DMP1 genes in a large cohort of patients with hypophophatemic rickets. More than half of the kindreds had mutations in PHEX, the gene associated with XLH. One kindred had a mutation in FGF23, the gene associated with ADHR. No mutations were found in DMP1, the gene for ARHR.

The PHEX gene encodes a protein of unknown function but with homologies to members of the M13 family of metallopeptidases 29. The structure of the protein consists of a short amino terminal cytoplasmic domain, a single transmembrane domain and a large extracellular domain containing a zinc binding motif and conserved cysteine residues. Characterizing mutations in the PHEX gene and their phenotypes may reveal functionally important regions of the gene product.

Sixteen novel mutations (27 total mutations) were found in the PHEX gene. The PHEX database and other reports have found mutations predominantly in the 3′ end of the gene 20, 30. However, the mutations in our cohort were distributed throughout the length of gene with 18 exonic regions and 5 intronic areas represented (out of 22 exons).

One mutation was of particular interest. A missense mutation (c.2249 A>T, p. 750 X>L) causing the stop codon for the last exon to be mutated, resulted in the production of the full length PHEX protein with an additional 10 amino acid fragment. The fact that the proband for this mutation suffered from hypophosphatemic rickets emphasizes the importance of the 3′ end of the gene for maintaining normal function and is consistent with the preponderance of 3′ end mutations in the PHEX database.

Additionally, one kindred highlights the large variability in disease presentation that can occur within a single family. In kindred 19, the PHEX mutation was a probably damaging missense mutation in exon 19 (c. 1936 G>A, p. 646 D>N). The proband, the proband’s brother and the proband’s mother had the mutation and had XLH as evidenced by renal phosphate wasting and slightly elevated FGF23 levels. However, only the proband had marked hypophosphatemia and significant bone related clinical features although the proband’s brother had short stature and mild frontal bossing. This suggests that other genetic, metabolic or development factors must mediate the effect of this PHEX mutation and illustrates the importance of completing a thorough evaluation of apparently non-affected family members in order to accurately determine future familial genetic risk. While we did not identify genetic variants in the other two genes examined (FGF23 or DMP1) for this kindred, there may be other interacting genes involved. It has been established that the phenotypic presentation of XLH can vary greatly, even within a single kindred 31. Also, the link between mutations in PHEX and the pathophysiology of XLH is not understood. Furthermore, it is widely accepted that XLH has complete penetrance. Contrary to this accepted view, a recent report describes discordance for clinical XLH disease in monozygotic twin girls with a family history of X-linked inheritance and no detectable PHEX or FGF23 mutations 32. This supports the idea that other factors work synergistically with PHEX mutations to determine the pathophysiology of hypophosphatemia.

Much rarer than XLH, ADHR is associated with mutations in FGF23. FGF23 is a 251 amino acid protein which influences renal phosphate wasting through two main mechanisms. FGF23 influences the internalization of the renal tubule sodium phosphate co-transporter- 2a, a proximal tubule protein that reabsorbs phosphate that has been filtered by the glomerulus. FGF23 also down regulates the one alpha hydroxylase enzyme in the kidney, a cytochrome P450 enzyme that aids the hydroxylation of 25 OH vitamin D to 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D 3334. We describe one sporadic patient with an FGF23 mutation. As with other disease causing FGF23 mutations, it was found in the consensus sequence for the proprotein convertase cleavage site.

DMP1 mutations, associated with ARHR, have been described in only a handful of kindreds worldwide 1516, 18, 35. Because we did not observe any mutations in DMP1, DMP1 is unlikely to be a causative factor in the hypophosphatemic rickets observed in our cohort. We did find a large number of kindreds with sequence variants and heterozygous changes in the exon 6 of the DMP1 gene suggesting that this area may be highly susceptible to genetic change.

In keeping with past literature, a high percentage of our patients (41%) were found to have no detectable mutation in PHEX 30, 3637. Although not performed as part of this study, it may be helpful to include multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis as part of further testing. This technique that allows multiple DNA targets to be amplified with a single primer pair and has recently been used to detect large deletions in a cohort of patients with XLH38. A small fraction of the patients with no PHEX mutations did have sequence variants in FGF23, and no patients were found with DMP1 mutations, leaving 39% with no assignable genetic locus for their disease. This suggests that other non-coding areas of the sequenced genes, including regulatory elements are may be involved in hypophosphatemic rickets. Additionally, mutations in other genes that have not previously been identified may also lead to development of disease. Two groups have recently identified and sequenced a new gene involved in hypophosphatemic rickets known as the ectonucleotide pyrophosphate/phosphodiesterase gene (ENPP1; MIM # 173335). ENPP1 is a regulator of extracellular pyrophosphate 3940 and has been previously been linked to the development of generalized arterial calcification of infancy (GACI; MIM #208000). Loss of function mutations were observed in five families with ARHR2 (MIM #613312). It would be of interest to evaluate ENPP1 in our 11 kindreds where neither an X-linked inheritance pattern nor PHEX, FGF23 or DMP1 mutations could be established. However, because of the rarity of the ENPP1 mutation it is unlikely that it accounts for all of our patients who suffered from hypophosphatemia but did not have disease-causing mutation in PHEX, FGF23 or DMP1. Therefore, it is likely that there are still other genes for this complex disorder that are waiting to be discovered.

In conclusion, we report the detailed genetic analysis of a large cohort of subjects with hypophosphatemic rickets. We found a large number of novel PHEX mutations in patients and a single disease causing FGF23 mutation. This study serves to extend the spectrum of mutations that occur in hypophosphatemic rickets. In conclusion, the significant rate of kindreds that were found to lack a mutation in the three genes associated with hypophosphatemic rickets indicates that the continued investigation and discovery of causative genes may aid the further unraveling of the link between genetic mutations and pathophysiology in hypophosphatemic rickets.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, which is funded by National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Award KL2 RR0224149 (MR) from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health. It was also supported by a grant from Shriners Hospital for Children #8520 (HN).

Footnotes

Competing interests/financial disclosure

None to declare.

References

  • 1.Albright F, Butler A, Bloomberg E. Rickets Resistant to Vitamin D Therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1939;54:529–547. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davies M, Stanbury SW. The rheumatic manifestations of metabolic bone disease. Clinics in Rheumatic Diseases. 1981;7:595–646. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck-Nielsen SS, Brock-Jacobsen B, Gram J, et al. Incidence and prevalence of nutritional and hereditary rickets in southern Denmark. European Journal of Endocrinology/European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2009;160:491–497. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.A gene (PEX) with homologies to endopeptidases is mutated in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. The HYP Consortium. Nature Genetics. 1995;11:130–136. doi: 10.1038/ng1095-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beck L, Soumounou Y, Martel J, et al. Pex/PEX tissue distribution and evidence for a deletion in the 3′ region of the Pex gene in X-linked hypophosphatemic mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;99:1200–1209. doi: 10.1172/JCI119276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ruchon AF, Tenenhouse HS, Marcinkiewicz M, et al. Developmental expression and tissue distribution of Phex protein: effect of the Hyp mutation and relationship to bone markers. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15:1440–1450. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guo R, Quarles LD. Cloning and sequencing of human PEX from a bone cDNA library: evidence for its developmental stage-specific regulation in osteoblasts. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1997;12:1009–1017. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.7.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Econs MJ, McEnery PT. Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia: clinical characterization of a novel renal phosphate-wasting disorder. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1997;82:674–681. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.2.3765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Autosomal dominant hypophosphataemic rickets is associated with mutations in FGF23. The ADHR Consortium. Nature Genetics. 2000;26:345–348. doi: 10.1038/81664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Econs MJ, McEnery PT, Lennon F, et al. Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets is linked to chromosome 12p13. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;100:2653–2657. doi: 10.1172/JCI119809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Riminucci M, Collins MT, Fedarko NS, et al. FGF-23 in fibrous dysplasia of bone and its relationship to renal phosphate wasting. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2003;112:683–692. doi: 10.1172/JCI18399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shimada T, Mizutani S, Muto T, et al. Cloning and characterization of FGF23 as a causative factor of tumor-induced osteomalacia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001:6500–6505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101545198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.White KE, Carn G, Lorenz-Depiereux B, et al. Autosomal-dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR) mutations stabilize FGF-23. Kidney International. 2001;60:2079–2086. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bai XY, Miao D, Goltzman D, et al. The autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets R176Q mutation in fibroblast growth factor 23 resists proteolytic cleavage and enhances in vivo biological potency. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:9843–9849. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210490200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lorenz-Depiereux B, Bastepe M, Benet-Pages A, et al. DMP1 mutations in autosomal recessive hypophosphatemia implicate a bone matrix protein in the regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Nature Genetics. 2006;38:1248–1250. doi: 10.1038/ng1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S, et al. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nature Genetics. 2006;38:1310–1315. doi: 10.1038/ng1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fisher LW, Fedarko NS. Six genes expressed in bones and teeth encode the current members of the SIBLING family of proteins. Connective Tissue Research. 2003;44(Suppl 1):33–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Farrow EG, Davis SI, Ward LM, et al. Molecular analysis of DMP1 mutants causing autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets. Bone. 2009;44:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koshida R, Yamaguchi H, Yamasaki K, et al. A novel nonsense mutation in the DMP1 gene in a Japanese family with autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sabbagh Y, Jones AO, Tenenhouse HS. PHEXdb, a locus-specific database for mutations causing X-linked hypophosphatemia. Human Mutation. 2000;16:1–6. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200007)16:1<1::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Francis F, Strom TM, Hennig S, et al. Genomic organization of the human PEX gene mutated in X-linked dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Genome Research. 1997;7:573–585. doi: 10.1101/gr.7.6.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rowe PS, Oudet CL, Francis F, et al. Distribution of mutations in the PEX gene in families with X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets (HYP) Human Molecular Genetics. 1997;6:539–549. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.4.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nelson AE, Bligh RC, Mirams M, et al. Clinical case seminar: Fibroblast growth factor 23: a new clinical marker for oncogenic osteomalacia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2003;88:4088–4094. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Larsson T, Yu X, Davis SI, et al. A novel recessive mutation in fibroblast growth factor-23 causes familial tumoral calcinosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005;90:2424–2427. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sunyaev SR, Eisenhaber F, Rodchenkov IV, et al. PSIC: profile extraction from sequence alignments with position-specific counts of independent observations. Protein Engineering. 1999;12:387–394. doi: 10.1093/protein/12.5.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3812–3814. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walton RJ, Bijvoet OL. Nomogram for derivation of renal threshold phosphate concentration. Lancet. 1975;2:309–310. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92736-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stark H, Eisenstein B, Tieder M, et al. Direct measurement of TP/GFR: a simple and reliable parameter of renal phosphate handling. Nephron. 1986;44:125–128. doi: 10.1159/000184216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tenenhouse HS. X-linked hypophosphataemia: a homologous disorder in humans and mice. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 1999;14:333–341. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ichikawa S, Traxler EA, Estwick SA, et al. Mutational survey of the PHEX gene in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Bone. 2008;43:663–666. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carpenter TO. New perspectives on the biology and treatment of X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 1997;44:443–466. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70485-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Owen CJ, Habeb A, Pearce SH, et al. Discordance for X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets in identical twin girls. Hormone Research. 2009;71:237–244. doi: 10.1159/000201113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shimada T, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki Y, et al. FGF-23 is a potent regulator of vitamin D metabolism and phosphate homeostasis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19:429–435. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.0301264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Inoue Y, Segawa H, Kaneko I, et al. Role of the vitamin D receptor in FGF23 action on phosphate metabolism. Biochemical Journal. 2005;390:325–331. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turan S, Aydin C, Bereket A, et al. Identification of a novel dentin matrix protein-1 (DMP-1) mutation and dental anomalies in a kindred with autosomal recessive hypophosphatemia. Bone. 2010;46:402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Holm IA, Huang X, Kunkel LM. Mutational analysis of the PEX gene in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:790–797. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gaucher C, Walrant-Debray O, Nguyen TM, et al. PHEX analysis in 118 pedigrees reveals new genetic clues in hypophosphatemic rickets. Human Genetics. 2009;125:401–411. doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0631-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clausmeyer S, Hesse V, Clemens PC, et al. Mutational analysis of the PHEX gene: novel point mutations and detection of large deletions by MLPA in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Calcified Tissue International. 2009;85:211–220. doi: 10.1007/s00223-009-9260-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lorenz-Depiereux B, Schnabel D, Tiosano D, et al. Loss-of-Function ENPP1 Mutations Cause Both Generalized Arterial Calcification of Infancy and Autosomal-Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:267–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Levy-Litan V, Hershkovitz E, Avizov L, et al. Autosomal-Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets Is Associated with an Inactivation Mutation in the ENPP1 Gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES