Correction
Since publication of our article [1], we have realized that Figure two (Figure 1): "Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of difference in total number of guidelines met", is incorrect. The original text referring to the figure as well as the figure legend is correct. The correct Figure two (Figure 1) is displayed here. We apologise for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.
Figure 1.
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of difference in total number of guidelines met. Notes TPC = tailored print communication; TMI = telephone motivational interviewing; combined = combination of TPC and TMI.
Contributor Information
Hilde M van Keulen, Email: hilde.vankeulen@tno.nl.
Judith E Bosmans, Email: judith.bosmans@falw.vu.nl.
Maurits W van Tulder, Email: maurits.van.tulder@falw.vu.nl.
Johan L Severens, Email: severens@bmg.eur.nl.
Hein de Vries, Email: hein.devries@gvo.unimaas.nl.
Johannes Brug, Email: j.brug@vumc.nl.
Ilse Mesters, Email: i.mesters@epid.unimaas.nl.
References
- Van Keulen HM, Bosmans JE, van Tulder MW, Severens JL, de Vries H, Brug J, Mesters I. Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2010;7:64. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]